diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/development/licensing.md')
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/development/licensing.md | 10 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/doc/development/licensing.md b/doc/development/licensing.md index d1808822ba6..d7c2c764883 100644 --- a/doc/development/licensing.md +++ b/doc/development/licensing.md @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ --- stage: none group: unassigned -info: To determine the technical writer assigned to the Stage/Group associated with this page, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/ux/technical-writing/#designated-technical-writers +info: To determine the technical writer assigned to the Stage/Group associated with this page, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/ux/technical-writing/#assignments --- # GitLab Licensing and Compatibility @@ -12,16 +12,16 @@ info: To determine the technical writer assigned to the Stage/Group associated w In order to comply with the terms the libraries we use are licensed under, we have to make sure to check new gems for compatible licenses whenever they're added. To automate this process, we use the [license_finder](https://github.com/pivotal/LicenseFinder) gem by Pivotal. It runs every time a new commit is pushed and verifies that all gems and node modules in the bundle use a license that doesn't conflict with the licensing of either GitLab Community Edition or GitLab Enterprise Edition. -There are some limitations with the automated testing, however. CSS, JavaScript, or Ruby libraries which are not included by way of Bundler, NPM, or Yarn (for instance those manually copied into our source tree in the `vendor` directory), must be verified manually and independently. Take care whenever one such library is used, as automated tests won't catch problematic licenses from them. +There are some limitations with the automated testing, however. CSS, JavaScript, or Ruby libraries which are not included by way of Bundler, NPM, or Yarn (for instance those manually copied into our source tree in the `vendor` directory), must be verified manually and independently. Take care whenever one such library is used, as automated tests don't catch problematic licenses from them. -Some gems may not include their license information in their `gemspec` file, and some node modules may not include their license information in their `package.json` file. These won't be detected by License Finder, and will have to be verified manually. +Some gems may not include their license information in their `gemspec` file, and some node modules may not include their license information in their `package.json` file. These aren't detected by License Finder, and must be verified manually. ### License Finder commands -NOTE: **Note:** +NOTE: License Finder currently uses GitLab misused terms of `whitelist` and `blacklist`. As a result, the commands below reference those terms. We've created an [issue on their project](https://github.com/pivotal/LicenseFinder/issues/745) to propose that they rename their commands. -There are a few basic commands License Finder provides that you'll need in order to manage license detection. +There are a few basic commands License Finder provides that you need in order to manage license detection. To verify that the checks are passing, and/or to see what dependencies are causing the checks to fail: |