summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/development/testing_guide/end_to_end/best_practices.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/development/testing_guide/end_to_end/best_practices.md')
-rw-r--r--doc/development/testing_guide/end_to_end/best_practices.md146
1 files changed, 145 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/doc/development/testing_guide/end_to_end/best_practices.md b/doc/development/testing_guide/end_to_end/best_practices.md
index 3b193721143..36cb49256a6 100644
--- a/doc/development/testing_guide/end_to_end/best_practices.md
+++ b/doc/development/testing_guide/end_to_end/best_practices.md
@@ -1,7 +1,128 @@
# End-to-end testing Best Practices
NOTE: **Note:**
-This is an tailored extension of the Best Practices [found in the testing guide](../best_practices.md).
+This is a tailored extension of the Best Practices [found in the testing guide](../best_practices.md).
+
+## Link a test to its test-case issue
+
+Every test should have a corresponding issue in the [Quality Testcases project](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/quality/testcases/).
+It's recommended that you reuse the issue created to plan the test. If one does not already exist you
+can create the issue yourself. Alternatively, you can run the test in a pipeline that has reporting
+enabled and the test-case issue reporter will automatically create a new issue.
+
+Whether you create a new test-case issue or one is created automatically, you will need to manually add
+a `testcase` RSpec metadata tag. In most cases, a single test will be associated with a single test-case
+issue ([see below for exceptions](#exceptions)).
+
+For example:
+
+```ruby
+RSpec.describe 'Stage' do
+ describe 'General description of the feature under test' do
+ it 'test name', testcase: 'https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/quality/testcases/-/issues/:issue_id' do
+ ...
+ end
+
+ it 'another test', testcase: 'https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/quality/testcases/-/issues/:another_issue_id' do
+ ...
+ end
+ end
+end
+```
+
+### Exceptions
+
+Most tests are defined by a single line of a `spec` file, which is why those tests can be linked to a
+single test-case issue via the `testcase` tag.
+
+However, some tests don't have a one-to-one relationship between a line of a `spec` file and a test-case
+issue. This is because some tests are defined in a way that means a single line is associated with
+multiple tests, including:
+
+- Parallelized tests.
+- Templated tests.
+- Tests in shared examples that include more than one example.
+
+In those and similar cases we can't assign a single `testcase` tag and so we rely on the test-case
+reporter to programmatically determine the correct test-case issue based on the name and description of
+the test. In such cases, the test-case reporter will automatically create a test-case issue the first time
+the test runs, if no issue exists already.
+
+In such a case, if you create the issue yourself or want to reuse an existing issue,
+you must use this [end-to-end test issue template](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/quality/testcases/-/blob/master/.gitlab/issue_templates/End-to-end%20Test.md)
+to format the issue description.
+
+To illustrate, there are two tests in the shared examples in [`qa/specs/features/ee/browser_ui/3_create/repository/restrict_push_protected_branch_spec.rb`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/47b17db82c38ab704a23b5ba5d296ea0c6a732c8/qa/qa/specs/features/ee/browser_ui/3_create/repository/restrict_push_protected_branch_spec.rb):
+
+```ruby
+shared_examples 'only user with access pushes and merges' do
+ it 'unselected maintainer user fails to push' do
+ ...
+ end
+
+ it 'selected developer user pushes and merges' do
+ ...
+ end
+end
+```
+
+Consider the following test that includes the shared examples:
+
+```ruby
+RSpec.describe 'Create' do
+ describe 'Restricted protected branch push and merge' do
+ context 'when only one user is allowed to merge and push to a protected branch' do
+ ...
+ it_behaves_like 'only user with access pushes and merges'
+ end
+ end
+end
+```
+
+There would be two associated test-case issues, one for each shared example, with the following content:
+
+[Test 1](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/quality/testcases/-/issues/600):
+
+````markdown
+```markdown
+Title: browser_ui/3_create/repository/restrict_push_protected_branch_spec.rb | Create Restricted
+protected branch push and merge when only one user is allowed to merge and push to a protected
+branch behaves like only user with access pushes and merges selecte...
+
+Description:
+### Full description
+
+Create Restricted protected branch push and merge when only one user is allowed to merge and push
+to a protected branch behaves like only user with access pushes and merges selected developer user
+pushes and merges
+
+### File path
+
+./qa/specs/features/ee/browser_ui/3_create/repository/restrict_push_protected_branch_spec.rb
+
+```
+````
+
+[Test 2](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/quality/testcases/-/issues/602):
+
+````markdown
+```markdown
+Title: browser_ui/3_create/repository/restrict_push_protected_branch_spec.rb | Create Restricted
+protected branch push and merge when only one user is allowed to merge and push to a protected
+branch behaves like only user with access pushes and merges unselec...
+
+Description:
+### Full description
+
+Create Restricted protected branch push and merge when only one user is allowed to merge and push
+to a protected branch behaves like only user with access pushes and merges unselected maintainer
+user fails to push
+
+### File path
+
+./qa/specs/features/ee/browser_ui/3_create/repository/restrict_push_protected_branch_spec.rb
+```
+````
## Prefer API over UI
@@ -166,3 +287,26 @@ end
NOTE: **Note:**
A few exceptions for using a `ProjectPush` would be when your test calls for testing SSH integration or
using the Git CLI.
+
+## Preferred method to blur elements
+
+To blur an element, the preferred method is to click another element that does not alter the test state.
+If there's a mask that blocks the page elements, such as may occur with some dropdowns,
+use WebDriver's native mouse events to simulate a click event on the coordinates of an element. Use the following method: `click_element_coordinates`.
+
+Avoid clicking the `body` for blurring elements such as inputs and dropdowns because it clicks the center of the viewport.
+This action can also unintentionally click other elements, altering the test state and causing it to fail.
+
+```ruby
+# Clicking another element to blur an input
+def add_issue_to_epic(issue_url)
+ find_element(:issue_actions_split_button).find('button', text: 'Add an issue').click
+ fill_element :add_issue_input, issue_url
+ # Clicking the title blurs the input
+ click_element :title
+ click_element :add_issue_button
+end
+
+# Using native mouse click events in the case of a mask/overlay
+click_element_coordinates(:title)
+```