summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/development/testing_guide/end_to_end/page_objects.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/development/testing_guide/end_to_end/page_objects.md')
-rw-r--r--doc/development/testing_guide/end_to_end/page_objects.md26
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/doc/development/testing_guide/end_to_end/page_objects.md b/doc/development/testing_guide/end_to_end/page_objects.md
index 7eacaf4b08a..939e44cedd9 100644
--- a/doc/development/testing_guide/end_to_end/page_objects.md
+++ b/doc/development/testing_guide/end_to_end/page_objects.md
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
---
stage: none
group: unassigned
-info: To determine the technical writer assigned to the Stage/Group associated with this page, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/ux/technical-writing/#designated-technical-writers
+info: To determine the technical writer assigned to the Stage/Group associated with this page, see https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/ux/technical-writing/#assignments
---
# Page objects in GitLab QA
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ fields.
## Why do we need that?
We need page objects because we need to reduce duplication and avoid problems
-whenever someone changes some selectors in GitLab's source code.
+whenever someone changes some selectors in the GitLab source code.
Imagine that we have a hundred specs in GitLab QA, and we need to sign into
GitLab each time, before we make assertions. Without a page object, one would
@@ -30,13 +30,13 @@ need to rely on volatile helpers or invoke Capybara methods directly. Imagine
invoking `fill_in :user_login` in every `*_spec.rb` file / test example.
When someone later changes `t.text_field :login` in the view associated with
-this page to `t.text_field :username` it will generate a different field
+this page to `t.text_field :username` it generates a different field
identifier, what would effectively break all tests.
Because we are using `Page::Main::Login.perform(&:sign_in_using_credentials)`
everywhere, when we want to sign in to GitLab, the page object is the single
-source of truth, and we will need to update `fill_in :user_login`
-to `fill_in :user_username` only in a one place.
+source of truth, and we must update `fill_in :user_login`
+to `fill_in :user_username` only in one place.
## What problems did we have in the past?
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ We do not run QA tests for every commit, because of performance reasons, and
the time it would take to build packages and test everything.
That is why when someone changes `t.text_field :login` to
-`t.text_field :username` in the _new session_ view we won't know about this
+`t.text_field :username` in the _new session_ view we don't know about this
change until our GitLab QA nightly pipeline fails, or until someone triggers
`package-and-qa` action in their merge request.
@@ -56,14 +56,14 @@ problem by introducing coupling between GitLab CE / EE views and GitLab QA.
## How did we solve fragile tests problem?
-Currently, when you add a new `Page::Base` derived class, you will also need to
+Currently, when you add a new `Page::Base` derived class, you must also
define all selectors that your page objects depend on.
Whenever you push your code to CE / EE repository, `qa:selectors` sanity test
-job is going to be run as a part of a CI pipeline.
+job runs as a part of a CI pipeline.
-This test is going to validate all page objects that we have implemented in
-`qa/page` directory. When it fails, you will be notified about missing
+This test validates all page objects that we have implemented in
+`qa/page` directory. When it fails, it notifies you about missing
or invalid views/selectors definition.
## How to properly implement a page object?
@@ -95,10 +95,10 @@ end
### Defining Elements
-The `view` DSL method will correspond to the Rails view, partial, or Vue component that renders the elements.
+The `view` DSL method corresponds to the Rails view, partial, or Vue component that renders the elements.
The `element` DSL method in turn declares an element for which a corresponding
-`data-qa-selector=element_name_snaked` data attribute will need to be added to the view file.
+`data-qa-selector=element_name_snaked` data attribute must be added to the view file.
You can also define a value (String or Regexp) to match to the actual view
code but **this is deprecated** in favor of the above method for two reasons:
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ These modules must:
1. Include/prepend other modules and define their `view`/`elements` in a `base.class_eval` block to ensure they're
defined in the class that prepends the module.
-These steps ensure the sanity selectors check will detect problems properly.
+These steps ensure the sanity selectors check detect problems properly.
For example, `qa/qa/ee/page/merge_request/show.rb` adds EE-specific methods to `qa/qa/page/merge_request/show.rb` (with
`QA::Page::MergeRequest::Show.prepend_if_ee('QA::EE::Page::MergeRequest::Show')`) and following is how it's implemented