summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/development/testing_guide/end_to_end/resources.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/development/testing_guide/end_to_end/resources.md')
-rw-r--r--doc/development/testing_guide/end_to_end/resources.md392
1 files changed, 392 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/development/testing_guide/end_to_end/resources.md b/doc/development/testing_guide/end_to_end/resources.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..1e32db4f633
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/development/testing_guide/end_to_end/resources.md
@@ -0,0 +1,392 @@
+# Resource class in GitLab QA
+
+Resources are primarily created using Browser UI steps, but can also
+be created via the API or the CLI.
+
+## How to properly implement a resource class?
+
+All resource classes should inherit from `Resource::Base`.
+
+There is only one mandatory method to implement to define a resource class.
+This is the `#fabricate!` method, which is used to build the resource via the
+browser UI. Note that you should only use [Page objects](page_objects.md) to
+interact with a Web page in this method.
+
+Here is an imaginary example:
+
+```ruby
+module QA
+ module Resource
+ class Shirt < Base
+ attr_accessor :name
+
+ def fabricate!
+ Page::Dashboard::Index.perform do |dashboard_index|
+ dashboard_index.go_to_new_shirt
+ end
+
+ Page::Shirt::New.perform do |shirt_new|
+ shirt_new.set_name(name)
+ shirt_new.create_shirt!
+ end
+ end
+ end
+ end
+end
+```
+
+### Define API implementation
+
+A resource class may also implement the three following methods to be able to
+create the resource via the public GitLab API:
+
+- `#api_get_path`: The `GET` path to fetch an existing resource.
+- `#api_post_path`: The `POST` path to create a new resource.
+- `#api_post_body`: The `POST` body (as a Ruby hash) to create a new resource.
+
+Let's take the `Shirt` resource class, and add these three API methods:
+
+```ruby
+module QA
+ module Resource
+ class Shirt < Base
+ attr_accessor :name
+
+ def fabricate!
+ # ... same as before
+ end
+
+ def api_get_path
+ "/shirt/#{name}"
+ end
+
+ def api_post_path
+ "/shirts"
+ end
+
+ def api_post_body
+ {
+ name: name
+ }
+ end
+ end
+ end
+end
+```
+
+The `Project` resource is a good real example of Browser
+UI and API implementations.
+
+#### Resource attributes
+
+A resource may need another resource to exist first. For instance, a project
+needs a group to be created in.
+
+To define a resource attribute, you can use the `attribute` method with a
+block using the other resource class to fabricate the resource.
+
+That will allow access to the other resource from your resource object's
+methods. You would usually use it in `#fabricate!`, `#api_get_path`,
+`#api_post_path`, `#api_post_body`.
+
+Let's take the `Shirt` resource class, and add a `project` attribute to it:
+
+```ruby
+module QA
+ module Resource
+ class Shirt < Base
+ attr_accessor :name
+
+ attribute :project do
+ Project.fabricate! do |resource|
+ resource.name = 'project-to-create-a-shirt'
+ end
+ end
+
+ def fabricate!
+ project.visit!
+
+ Page::Project::Show.perform do |project_show|
+ project_show.go_to_new_shirt
+ end
+
+ Page::Shirt::New.perform do |shirt_new|
+ shirt_new.set_name(name)
+ shirt_new.create_shirt!
+ end
+ end
+
+ def api_get_path
+ "/project/#{project.path}/shirt/#{name}"
+ end
+
+ def api_post_path
+ "/project/#{project.path}/shirts"
+ end
+
+ def api_post_body
+ {
+ name: name
+ }
+ end
+ end
+ end
+end
+```
+
+**Note that all the attributes are lazily constructed. This means if you want
+a specific attribute to be fabricated first, you'll need to call the
+attribute method first even if you're not using it.**
+
+#### Product data attributes
+
+Once created, you may want to populate a resource with attributes that can be
+found in the Web page, or in the API response.
+For instance, once you create a project, you may want to store its repository
+SSH URL as an attribute.
+
+Again we could use the `attribute` method with a block, using a page object
+to retrieve the data on the page.
+
+Let's take the `Shirt` resource class, and define a `:brand` attribute:
+
+```ruby
+module QA
+ module Resource
+ class Shirt < Base
+ attr_accessor :name
+
+ attribute :project do
+ Project.fabricate! do |resource|
+ resource.name = 'project-to-create-a-shirt'
+ end
+ end
+
+ # Attribute populated from the Browser UI (using the block)
+ attribute :brand do
+ Page::Shirt::Show.perform do |shirt_show|
+ shirt_show.fetch_brand_from_page
+ end
+ end
+
+ # ... same as before
+ end
+ end
+end
+```
+
+**Note again that all the attributes are lazily constructed. This means if
+you call `shirt.brand` after moving to the other page, it'll not properly
+retrieve the data because we're no longer on the expected page.**
+
+Consider this:
+
+```ruby
+shirt =
+ QA::Resource::Shirt.fabricate! do |resource|
+ resource.name = "GitLab QA"
+ end
+
+shirt.project.visit!
+
+shirt.brand # => FAIL!
+```
+
+The above example will fail because now we're on the project page, trying to
+construct the brand data from the shirt page, however we moved to the project
+page already. There are two ways to solve this, one is that we could try to
+retrieve the brand before visiting the project again:
+
+```ruby
+shirt =
+ QA::Resource::Shirt.fabricate! do |resource|
+ resource.name = "GitLab QA"
+ end
+
+shirt.brand # => OK!
+
+shirt.project.visit!
+
+shirt.brand # => OK!
+```
+
+The attribute will be stored in the instance therefore all the following calls
+will be fine, using the data previously constructed. If we think that this
+might be too brittle, we could eagerly construct the data right before
+ending fabrication:
+
+```ruby
+module QA
+ module Resource
+ class Shirt < Base
+ # ... same as before
+
+ def fabricate!
+ project.visit!
+
+ Page::Project::Show.perform do |project_show|
+ project_show.go_to_new_shirt
+ end
+
+ Page::Shirt::New.perform do |shirt_new|
+ shirt_new.set_name(name)
+ shirt_new.create_shirt!
+ end
+
+ populate(:brand) # Eagerly construct the data
+ end
+ end
+ end
+end
+```
+
+The `populate` method will iterate through its arguments and call each
+attribute respectively. Here `populate(:brand)` has the same effect as
+just `brand`. Using the populate method makes the intention clearer.
+
+With this, it will make sure we construct the data right after we create the
+shirt. The drawback is that this will always construct the data when the
+resource is fabricated even if we don't need to use the data.
+
+Alternatively, we could just make sure we're on the right page before
+constructing the brand data:
+
+```ruby
+module QA
+ module Resource
+ class Shirt < Base
+ attr_accessor :name
+
+ attribute :project do
+ Project.fabricate! do |resource|
+ resource.name = 'project-to-create-a-shirt'
+ end
+ end
+
+ # Attribute populated from the Browser UI (using the block)
+ attribute :brand do
+ back_url = current_url
+ visit!
+
+ Page::Shirt::Show.perform do |shirt_show|
+ shirt_show.fetch_brand_from_page
+ end
+
+ visit(back_url)
+ end
+
+ # ... same as before
+ end
+ end
+end
+```
+
+This will make sure it's on the shirt page before constructing brand, and
+move back to the previous page to avoid breaking the state.
+
+#### Define an attribute based on an API response
+
+Sometimes, you want to define a resource attribute based on the API response
+from its `GET` or `POST` request. For instance, if the creation of a shirt via
+the API returns
+
+```ruby
+{
+ brand: 'a-brand-new-brand',
+ style: 't-shirt',
+ materials: [[:cotton, 80], [:polyamide, 20]]
+}
+```
+
+you may want to store `style` as-is in the resource, and fetch the first value
+of the first `materials` item in a `main_fabric` attribute.
+
+Let's take the `Shirt` resource class, and define a `:style` and a
+`:main_fabric` attributes:
+
+```ruby
+module QA
+ module Resource
+ class Shirt < Base
+ # ... same as before
+
+ # @style from the instance if present,
+ # or fetched from the API response if present,
+ # or a QA::Resource::Base::NoValueError is raised otherwise
+ attribute :style
+
+ # If @main_fabric is not present,
+ # and if the API does not contain this field, this block will be
+ # used to construct the value based on the API response, and
+ # store the result in @main_fabric
+ attribute :main_fabric do
+ api_response.&dig(:materials, 0, 0)
+ end
+
+ # ... same as before
+ end
+ end
+end
+```
+
+**Notes on attributes precedence:**
+
+- resource instance variables have the highest precedence
+- attributes from the API response take precedence over attributes from the
+ block (usually from Browser UI)
+- attributes without a value will raise a `QA::Resource::Base::NoValueError` error
+
+## Creating resources in your tests
+
+To create a resource in your tests, you can call the `.fabricate!` method on
+the resource class.
+Note that if the resource class supports API fabrication, this will use this
+fabrication by default.
+
+Here is an example that will use the API fabrication method under the hood
+since it's supported by the `Shirt` resource class:
+
+```ruby
+my_shirt = Resource::Shirt.fabricate! do |shirt|
+ shirt.name = 'my-shirt'
+end
+
+expect(page).to have_text(my_shirt.name) # => "my-shirt" from the resource's instance variable
+expect(page).to have_text(my_shirt.brand) # => "a-brand-new-brand" from the API response
+expect(page).to have_text(my_shirt.style) # => "t-shirt" from the API response
+expect(page).to have_text(my_shirt.main_fabric) # => "cotton" from the API response via the block
+```
+
+If you explicitly want to use the Browser UI fabrication method, you can call
+the `.fabricate_via_browser_ui!` method instead:
+
+```ruby
+my_shirt = Resource::Shirt.fabricate_via_browser_ui! do |shirt|
+ shirt.name = 'my-shirt'
+end
+
+expect(page).to have_text(my_shirt.name) # => "my-shirt" from the resource's instance variable
+expect(page).to have_text(my_shirt.brand) # => the brand name fetched from the `Page::Shirt::Show` page via the block
+expect(page).to have_text(my_shirt.style) # => QA::Resource::Base::NoValueError will be raised because no API response nor a block is provided
+expect(page).to have_text(my_shirt.main_fabric) # => QA::Resource::Base::NoValueError will be raised because no API response and the block didn't provide a value (because it's also based on the API response)
+```
+
+You can also explicitly use the API fabrication method, by calling the
+`.fabricate_via_api!` method:
+
+```ruby
+my_shirt = Resource::Shirt.fabricate_via_api! do |shirt|
+ shirt.name = 'my-shirt'
+end
+```
+
+In this case, the result will be similar to calling
+`Resource::Shirt.fabricate!`.
+
+## Where to ask for help?
+
+If you need more information, ask for help on `#quality` channel on Slack
+(internal, GitLab Team only).
+
+If you are not a Team Member, and you still need help to contribute, please
+open an issue in GitLab CE issue tracker with the `~QA` label.