summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/development
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/development')
-rw-r--r--doc/development/fe_guide/style_guide_js.md17
-rw-r--r--doc/development/testing.md60
2 files changed, 74 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/doc/development/fe_guide/style_guide_js.md b/doc/development/fe_guide/style_guide_js.md
index 6ade3231fac..9c72fda0229 100644
--- a/doc/development/fe_guide/style_guide_js.md
+++ b/doc/development/fe_guide/style_guide_js.md
@@ -511,7 +511,24 @@ A forEach will cause side effects, it will be mutating the array being iterated.
$('span').tooltip('fixTitle');
```
+### The Javascript/Vue Accord
+The goal of this accord is to make sure we are all on the same page.
+1. When writing Vue, you may not use jQuery in your application.
+1.1 If you need to grab data from the DOM, you may query the DOM 1 time while bootstrapping your application to grab data attributes using `dataset`. You can do this without jQuery.
+1.2 You may use a jQuery dependency in Vue.js following [this example from the docs](https://vuejs.org/v2/examples/select2.html).
+1.3 If an outside jQuery Event needs to be listen to inside the Vue application, you may use jQuery event listeners.
+1.4 We will avoid adding new jQuery events when they are not required. Instead of adding new jQuery events take a look at [different methods to do the same task](https://vuejs.org/v2/api/#vm-emit).
+
+1. You may query the `window` object 1 time, while bootstrapping your application for application specific data (e.g. `scrollTo` is ok to access anytime). Do this access during the bootstrapping of your application.
+
+1. You may have a temporary but immediate need to create technical debt by writing code that does not follow our standards, to be refactored later. Maintainers need to be ok with the tech debt in the first place. An issue should be created for that tech debt to evaluate it further and discuss. In the coming months you should fix that tech debt, with it's priority to be determined by maintainers.
+
+1. When creating tech debt you must write the tests for that code before hand and those tests may not be rewritten. e.g. jQuery tests rewritten to Vue tests.
+
+1. You may choose to use VueX as a centralized state management. If you choose not to use VueX, you must use the *store pattern* which can be found in the [Vue.js documentation](https://vuejs.org/v2/guide/state-management.html#Simple-State-Management-from-Scratch).
+
+1. Once you have chosen a centralized state management solution you must use it for your entire application. i.e. Don't mix and match your state management solutions.
## SCSS
- [SCSS](style_guide_scss.md)
diff --git a/doc/development/testing.md b/doc/development/testing.md
index ac1865f6682..efd56484b12 100644
--- a/doc/development/testing.md
+++ b/doc/development/testing.md
@@ -157,8 +157,9 @@ trade-off:
- Unit tests are usually cheap, and you should consider them like the basement
of your house: you need them to be confident that your code is behaving
- correctly. However if you run only unit tests without integration / system tests, you might [miss] the [big] [picture]!
-- Integration tests are a bit more expensive, but don't abuse them. A feature test
+ correctly. However if you run only unit tests without integration / system
+ tests, you might [miss] the [big] [picture]!
+- Integration tests are a bit more expensive, but don't abuse them. A system test
is often better than an integration test that is stubbing a lot of internals.
- System tests are expensive (compared to unit tests), even more if they require
a JavaScript driver. Make sure to follow the guidelines in the [Speed](#test-speed)
@@ -195,11 +196,27 @@ Please consult the [dedicated "Frontend testing" guide](./fe_guide/testing.md).
- Try to match the ordering of tests to the ordering within the class.
- Try to follow the [Four-Phase Test][four-phase-test] pattern, using newlines
to separate phases.
-- Try to use `Gitlab.config.gitlab.host` rather than hard coding `'localhost'`
+- Use `Gitlab.config.gitlab.host` rather than hard coding `'localhost'`
+- Don't assert against the absolute value of a sequence-generated attribute (see
+ [Gotchas](gotchas.md#dont-assert-against-the-absolute-value-of-a-sequence-generated-attribute)).
+- Don't supply the `:each` argument to hooks since it's the default.
- On `before` and `after` hooks, prefer it scoped to `:context` over `:all`
[four-phase-test]: https://robots.thoughtbot.com/four-phase-test
+### Automatic retries and flaky tests detection
+
+On our CI, we use [rspec-retry] to automatically retry a failing example a few
+times (see [`spec/spec_helper.rb`] for the precise retries count).
+
+We also use a home-made `RspecFlaky::Listener` listener which records flaky
+examples in a JSON report file on `master` (`retrieve-tests-metadata` and `update-tests-metadata` jobs), and warns when a new flaky example
+is detected in any other branch (`flaky-examples-check` job). In the future, the
+`flaky-examples-check` job will not be allowed to fail.
+
+[rspec-retry]: https://github.com/NoRedInk/rspec-retry
+[`spec/spec_helper.rb`]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/spec/spec_helper.rb
+
### `let` variables
GitLab's RSpec suite has made extensive use of `let` variables to reduce
@@ -262,6 +279,43 @@ end
- Avoid scenario titles that add no information, such as "successfully".
- Avoid scenario titles that repeat the feature title.
+### Table-based / Parameterized tests
+
+This style of testing is used to exercise one piece of code with a comprehensive
+range of inputs. By specifying the test case once, alongside a table of inputs
+and the expected output for each, your tests can be made easier to read and more
+compact.
+
+We use the [rspec-parameterized](https://github.com/tomykaira/rspec-parameterized)
+gem. A short example, using the table syntax and checking Ruby equality for a
+range of inputs, might look like this:
+
+```ruby
+describe "#==" do
+ using Rspec::Parameterized::TableSyntax
+
+ let(:project1) { create(:project) }
+ let(:project2) { create(:project) }
+ where(:a, :b, :result) do
+ 1 | 1 | true
+ 1 | 2 | false
+ true | true | true
+ true | false | false
+ project1 | project1 | true
+ project2 | project2 | true
+ project 1 | project2 | false
+ end
+
+ with_them do
+ it { expect(a == b).to eq(result) }
+
+ it 'is isomorphic' do
+ expect(b == a).to eq(result)
+ end
+ end
+end
+```
+
### Matchers
Custom matchers should be created to clarify the intent and/or hide the