diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'spec/graphql/types/user_merge_request_interaction_type_spec.rb')
-rw-r--r-- | spec/graphql/types/user_merge_request_interaction_type_spec.rb | 116 |
1 files changed, 116 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/spec/graphql/types/user_merge_request_interaction_type_spec.rb b/spec/graphql/types/user_merge_request_interaction_type_spec.rb new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f424c9200ab --- /dev/null +++ b/spec/graphql/types/user_merge_request_interaction_type_spec.rb @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ +# frozen_string_literal: true + +require 'spec_helper' + +RSpec.describe GitlabSchema.types['UserMergeRequestInteraction'] do + include GraphqlHelpers + + let_it_be(:user) { create(:user) } + let_it_be(:current_user) { create(:user) } + let_it_be(:project) { create(:project, :public, :repository) } + let_it_be(:merge_request) { create(:merge_request, source_project: project) } + + let(:interaction) { ::Users::MergeRequestInteraction.new(user: user, merge_request: merge_request.reset) } + + specify { expect(described_class).to require_graphql_authorizations(:read_merge_request) } + + it 'has the expected fields' do + expected_fields = %w[ + can_merge + can_update + review_state + reviewed + approved + ] + + expect(described_class).to have_graphql_fields(*expected_fields).at_least + end + + def resolve(field_name) + resolve_field(field_name, interaction, current_user: current_user) + end + + describe '#can_merge' do + subject { resolve(:can_merge) } + + context 'when the user cannot merge' do + it { is_expected.to be false } + end + + context 'when the user can merge' do + before do + project.add_maintainer(user) + end + + it { is_expected.to be true } + end + end + + describe '#can_update' do + subject { resolve(:can_update) } + + context 'when the user cannot update the MR' do + it { is_expected.to be false } + end + + context 'when the user can update the MR' do + before do + project.add_developer(user) + end + + it { is_expected.to be true } + end + end + + describe '#review_state' do + subject { resolve(:review_state) } + + context 'when the user has not been asked to review the MR' do + it { is_expected.to be_nil } + + it 'implies not reviewed' do + expect(resolve(:reviewed)).to be false + end + end + + context 'when the user has been asked to review the MR' do + before do + merge_request.reviewers << user + end + + it { is_expected.to eq(Types::MergeRequestReviewStateEnum.values['UNREVIEWED'].value) } + + it 'implies not reviewed' do + expect(resolve(:reviewed)).to be false + end + end + + context 'when the user has provided a review' do + before do + merge_request.merge_request_reviewers.create!(reviewer: user, state: MergeRequestReviewer.states['reviewed']) + end + + it { is_expected.to eq(Types::MergeRequestReviewStateEnum.values['REVIEWED'].value) } + + it 'implies reviewed' do + expect(resolve(:reviewed)).to be true + end + end + end + + describe '#approved' do + subject { resolve(:approved) } + + context 'when the user has not approved the MR' do + it { is_expected.to be false } + end + + context 'when the user has approved the MR' do + before do + merge_request.approved_by_users << user + end + + it { is_expected.to be true } + end + end +end |