diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'spec')
186 files changed, 5563 insertions, 1404 deletions
diff --git a/spec/controllers/admin/application_settings_controller_spec.rb b/spec/controllers/admin/application_settings_controller_spec.rb index 10e1bfc30f9..2e0f79cd313 100644 --- a/spec/controllers/admin/application_settings_controller_spec.rb +++ b/spec/controllers/admin/application_settings_controller_spec.rb @@ -86,4 +86,22 @@ describe Admin::ApplicationSettingsController do expect(ApplicationSetting.current.receive_max_input_size).to eq(1024) end end + + describe 'PUT #reset_registration_token' do + before do + sign_in(admin) + end + + subject { put :reset_registration_token } + + it 'resets runner registration token' do + expect { subject }.to change { ApplicationSetting.current.runners_registration_token } + end + + it 'redirects the user to admin runners page' do + subject + + expect(response).to redirect_to(admin_runners_path) + end + end end diff --git a/spec/controllers/application_controller_spec.rb b/spec/controllers/application_controller_spec.rb index 7202cee04ea..2b28cfd16cc 100644 --- a/spec/controllers/application_controller_spec.rb +++ b/spec/controllers/application_controller_spec.rb @@ -728,4 +728,80 @@ describe ApplicationController do end end end + + context 'X-GitLab-Custom-Error header' do + before do + sign_in user + end + + context 'given a 422 error page' do + controller do + def index + render 'errors/omniauth_error', layout: 'errors', status: 422 + end + end + + it 'sets a custom header' do + get :index + + expect(response.headers['X-GitLab-Custom-Error']).to eq '1' + end + end + + context 'given a 500 error page' do + controller do + def index + render 'errors/omniauth_error', layout: 'errors', status: 500 + end + end + + it 'sets a custom header' do + get :index + + expect(response.headers['X-GitLab-Custom-Error']).to eq '1' + end + end + + context 'given a 200 success page' do + controller do + def index + render 'errors/omniauth_error', layout: 'errors', status: 200 + end + end + + it 'does not set a custom header' do + get :index + + expect(response.headers['X-GitLab-Custom-Error']).to be_nil + end + end + + context 'given a json response' do + controller do + def index + render json: {}, status: :unprocessable_entity + end + end + + it 'does not set a custom header' do + get :index, format: :json + + expect(response.headers['X-GitLab-Custom-Error']).to be_nil + end + end + + context 'given a json response for an html request' do + controller do + def index + render json: {}, status: :unprocessable_entity + end + end + + it 'does not set a custom header' do + get :index + + expect(response.headers['X-GitLab-Custom-Error']).to be_nil + end + end + end end diff --git a/spec/controllers/groups/settings/ci_cd_controller_spec.rb b/spec/controllers/groups/settings/ci_cd_controller_spec.rb index ea18122e0c3..06ccace8242 100644 --- a/spec/controllers/groups/settings/ci_cd_controller_spec.rb +++ b/spec/controllers/groups/settings/ci_cd_controller_spec.rb @@ -17,4 +17,18 @@ describe Groups::Settings::CiCdController do expect(response).to render_template(:show) end end + + describe 'PUT #reset_registration_token' do + subject { put :reset_registration_token, group_id: group } + + it 'resets runner registration token' do + expect { subject }.to change { group.reload.runners_token } + end + + it 'redirects the user to admin runners page' do + subject + + expect(response).to redirect_to(group_settings_ci_cd_path) + end + end end diff --git a/spec/controllers/projects/artifacts_controller_spec.rb b/spec/controllers/projects/artifacts_controller_spec.rb index 4ea6f869aa3..436f4525093 100644 --- a/spec/controllers/projects/artifacts_controller_spec.rb +++ b/spec/controllers/projects/artifacts_controller_spec.rb @@ -19,10 +19,42 @@ describe Projects::ArtifactsController do end describe 'GET download' do - it 'sends the artifacts file' do - expect(controller).to receive(:send_file).with(job.artifacts_file.path, hash_including(disposition: 'attachment')).and_call_original + subject { get :download, namespace_id: project.namespace, project_id: project, job_id: job, file_type: file_type } - get :download, namespace_id: project.namespace, project_id: project, job_id: job + context 'when no file type is supplied' do + let(:file_type) { nil } + + it 'sends the artifacts file' do + expect(controller).to receive(:send_file).with(job.artifacts_file.path, hash_including(disposition: 'attachment')).and_call_original + + subject + end + end + + context 'when a file type is supplied' do + context 'when an invalid file type is supplied' do + let(:file_type) { 'invalid' } + + it 'returns 404' do + subject + + expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(404) + end + end + + context 'when codequality file type is supplied' do + let(:file_type) { 'codequality' } + + before do + create(:ci_job_artifact, :codequality, job: job) + end + + it 'sends the codequality report' do + expect(controller).to receive(:send_file).with(job.job_artifacts_codequality.file.path, hash_including(disposition: 'attachment')).and_call_original + + subject + end + end end end diff --git a/spec/controllers/projects/settings/ci_cd_controller_spec.rb b/spec/controllers/projects/settings/ci_cd_controller_spec.rb index 1f14a0cc381..4629929f9af 100644 --- a/spec/controllers/projects/settings/ci_cd_controller_spec.rb +++ b/spec/controllers/projects/settings/ci_cd_controller_spec.rb @@ -74,6 +74,19 @@ describe Projects::Settings::CiCdController do end end + describe 'PUT #reset_registration_token' do + subject { put :reset_registration_token, namespace_id: project.namespace, project_id: project } + it 'resets runner registration token' do + expect { subject }.to change { project.reload.runners_token } + end + + it 'redirects the user to admin runners page' do + subject + + expect(response).to redirect_to(namespace_project_settings_ci_cd_path) + end + end + describe 'PATCH update' do let(:params) { { ci_config_path: '' } } diff --git a/spec/factories/broadcast_messages.rb b/spec/factories/broadcast_messages.rb index 9a65e7f8a3f..1a2be5e9552 100644 --- a/spec/factories/broadcast_messages.rb +++ b/spec/factories/broadcast_messages.rb @@ -1,17 +1,17 @@ FactoryBot.define do factory :broadcast_message do message "MyText" - starts_at 1.day.ago - ends_at 1.day.from_now + starts_at { 1.day.ago } + ends_at { 1.day.from_now } trait :expired do - starts_at 5.days.ago - ends_at 3.days.ago + starts_at { 5.days.ago } + ends_at { 3.days.ago } end trait :future do - starts_at 5.days.from_now - ends_at 6.days.from_now + starts_at { 5.days.from_now } + ends_at { 6.days.from_now } end end end diff --git a/spec/factories/ci/builds.rb b/spec/factories/ci/builds.rb index 9813190925b..0baa4ecc4e0 100644 --- a/spec/factories/ci/builds.rb +++ b/spec/factories/ci/builds.rb @@ -159,12 +159,12 @@ FactoryBot.define do end trait :erased do - erased_at Time.now + erased_at { Time.now } erased_by factory: :user end trait :queued do - queued_at Time.now + queued_at { Time.now } runner factory: :ci_runner end @@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ FactoryBot.define do end trait :expired do - artifacts_expire_at 1.minute.ago + artifacts_expire_at { 1.minute.ago } end trait :with_commit do diff --git a/spec/factories/ci/job_artifacts.rb b/spec/factories/ci/job_artifacts.rb index ee79f0ae5fd..e0aeadeecd7 100644 --- a/spec/factories/ci/job_artifacts.rb +++ b/spec/factories/ci/job_artifacts.rb @@ -117,6 +117,16 @@ FactoryBot.define do end end + trait :codequality do + file_type :codequality + file_format :gzip + + after(:build) do |artifact, evaluator| + artifact.file = fixture_file_upload( + Rails.root.join('spec/fixtures/codequality/codequality.json.gz'), 'application/x-gzip') + end + end + trait :correct_checksum do after(:build) do |artifact, evaluator| artifact.file_sha256 = Digest::SHA256.file(artifact.file.path).hexdigest diff --git a/spec/factories/ci/runners.rb b/spec/factories/ci/runners.rb index 347e4f433e2..f564e7bee47 100644 --- a/spec/factories/ci/runners.rb +++ b/spec/factories/ci/runners.rb @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ FactoryBot.define do runner_type :instance_type trait :online do - contacted_at Time.now + contacted_at { Time.now } end trait :instance do diff --git a/spec/factories/clusters/applications/helm.rb b/spec/factories/clusters/applications/helm.rb index c13b0249d94..3c9ca22a051 100644 --- a/spec/factories/clusters/applications/helm.rb +++ b/spec/factories/clusters/applications/helm.rb @@ -22,14 +22,27 @@ FactoryBot.define do status 3 end + trait :updating do + status 4 + end + + trait :updated do + status 5 + end + trait :errored do status(-1) status_reason 'something went wrong' end + trait :update_errored do + status(6) + status_reason 'something went wrong' + end + trait :timeouted do installing - updated_at ClusterWaitForAppInstallationWorker::TIMEOUT.ago + updated_at { ClusterWaitForAppInstallationWorker::TIMEOUT.ago } end factory :clusters_applications_ingress, class: Clusters::Applications::Ingress do diff --git a/spec/factories/clusters/platforms/kubernetes.rb b/spec/factories/clusters/platforms/kubernetes.rb index 36ac2372204..4a0d1b181ea 100644 --- a/spec/factories/clusters/platforms/kubernetes.rb +++ b/spec/factories/clusters/platforms/kubernetes.rb @@ -3,11 +3,10 @@ FactoryBot.define do cluster namespace nil api_url 'https://kubernetes.example.com' - token 'a' * 40 + token { 'a' * 40 } trait :configured do api_url 'https://kubernetes.example.com' - token 'a' * 40 username 'xxxxxx' password 'xxxxxx' diff --git a/spec/factories/emails.rb b/spec/factories/emails.rb index d23ddf9d79b..feacd5ccf15 100644 --- a/spec/factories/emails.rb +++ b/spec/factories/emails.rb @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ FactoryBot.define do user email { generate(:email_alias) } - trait(:confirmed) { confirmed_at Time.now } + trait(:confirmed) { confirmed_at { Time.now } } trait(:skip_validate) { to_create {|instance| instance.save(validate: false) } } end end diff --git a/spec/factories/gpg_keys.rb b/spec/factories/gpg_keys.rb index 51b8ddc9934..3c0f43cc1b6 100644 --- a/spec/factories/gpg_keys.rb +++ b/spec/factories/gpg_keys.rb @@ -2,11 +2,11 @@ require_relative '../support/helpers/gpg_helpers' FactoryBot.define do factory :gpg_key do - key GpgHelpers::User1.public_key + key { GpgHelpers::User1.public_key } user factory :gpg_key_with_subkeys do - key GpgHelpers::User1.public_key_with_extra_signing_key + key { GpgHelpers::User1.public_key_with_extra_signing_key } end end end diff --git a/spec/factories/group_members.rb b/spec/factories/group_members.rb index 47036560b9d..12be63e5d92 100644 --- a/spec/factories/group_members.rb +++ b/spec/factories/group_members.rb @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ FactoryBot.define do trait(:developer) { access_level GroupMember::DEVELOPER } trait(:maintainer) { access_level GroupMember::MAINTAINER } trait(:owner) { access_level GroupMember::OWNER } - trait(:access_request) { requested_at Time.now } + trait(:access_request) { requested_at { Time.now } } trait(:invited) do user_id nil diff --git a/spec/factories/issues.rb b/spec/factories/issues.rb index 4d4f74e101e..ab27fee33dc 100644 --- a/spec/factories/issues.rb +++ b/spec/factories/issues.rb @@ -13,6 +13,10 @@ FactoryBot.define do state :opened end + trait :locked do + discussion_locked true + end + trait :closed do state :closed closed_at { Time.now } diff --git a/spec/factories/merge_requests.rb b/spec/factories/merge_requests.rb index b8b089b069b..8094c43b065 100644 --- a/spec/factories/merge_requests.rb +++ b/spec/factories/merge_requests.rb @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ FactoryBot.define do trait :merge_when_pipeline_succeeds do merge_when_pipeline_succeeds true - merge_user author + merge_user { author } end trait :remove_source_branch do diff --git a/spec/factories/notes.rb b/spec/factories/notes.rb index 6844ed8aa4a..2d1f48bf249 100644 --- a/spec/factories/notes.rb +++ b/spec/factories/notes.rb @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ FactoryBot.define do noteable nil noteable_type 'Commit' noteable_id nil - commit_id RepoHelpers.sample_commit.id + commit_id { RepoHelpers.sample_commit.id } end trait :legacy_diff_note do diff --git a/spec/factories/oauth_access_grants.rb b/spec/factories/oauth_access_grants.rb index 9e6af24c4eb..02c51cd9899 100644 --- a/spec/factories/oauth_access_grants.rb +++ b/spec/factories/oauth_access_grants.rb @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ FactoryBot.define do resource_owner_id { create(:user).id } application token { Doorkeeper::OAuth::Helpers::UniqueToken.generate } - expires_in 2.hours + expires_in { 2.hours } redirect_uri { application.redirect_uri } scopes { application.scopes } diff --git a/spec/factories/project_members.rb b/spec/factories/project_members.rb index 22a8085ea45..c72e0487895 100644 --- a/spec/factories/project_members.rb +++ b/spec/factories/project_members.rb @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ FactoryBot.define do trait(:reporter) { access_level ProjectMember::REPORTER } trait(:developer) { access_level ProjectMember::DEVELOPER } trait(:maintainer) { access_level ProjectMember::MAINTAINER } - trait(:access_request) { requested_at Time.now } + trait(:access_request) { requested_at { Time.now } } trait(:invited) do user_id nil diff --git a/spec/factories/todos.rb b/spec/factories/todos.rb index 14486c80341..ed3d87eb76b 100644 --- a/spec/factories/todos.rb +++ b/spec/factories/todos.rb @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ FactoryBot.define do author user action { Todo::ASSIGNED } - commit_id RepoHelpers.sample_commit.id + commit_id { RepoHelpers.sample_commit.id } target_type "Commit" end end diff --git a/spec/factories/uploads.rb b/spec/factories/uploads.rb index 81c485fba1a..7256f785e1f 100644 --- a/spec/factories/uploads.rb +++ b/spec/factories/uploads.rb @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ FactoryBot.define do factory :upload do model { build(:project) } - size 100.kilobytes + size { 100.kilobytes } uploader "AvatarUploader" mount_point :avatar secret nil @@ -19,13 +19,13 @@ FactoryBot.define do uploader "PersonalFileUploader" path { File.join(secret, filename) } model { build(:personal_snippet) } - secret SecureRandom.hex + secret { SecureRandom.hex } end trait :issuable_upload do uploader "FileUploader" path { File.join(secret, filename) } - secret SecureRandom.hex + secret { SecureRandom.hex } end trait :with_file do @@ -43,14 +43,14 @@ FactoryBot.define do model { build(:group) } path { File.join(secret, filename) } uploader "NamespaceFileUploader" - secret SecureRandom.hex + secret { SecureRandom.hex } end trait :favicon_upload do model { build(:appearance) } path { File.join(secret, filename) } uploader "FaviconUploader" - secret SecureRandom.hex + secret { SecureRandom.hex } end trait :attachment_upload do diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_manage_applications_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_manage_applications_spec.rb index f979d2f6090..a4904272706 100644 --- a/spec/features/admin/admin_manage_applications_spec.rb +++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_manage_applications_spec.rb @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'admin manage applications' do check :doorkeeper_application_trusted click_on 'Submit' expect(page).to have_content('Application: test') - expect(page).to have_content('Application Id') + expect(page).to have_content('Application ID') expect(page).to have_content('Secret') expect(page).to have_content('Trusted Y') @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'admin manage applications' do click_on 'Submit' expect(page).to have_content('test_changed') - expect(page).to have_content('Application Id') + expect(page).to have_content('Application ID') expect(page).to have_content('Secret') expect(page).to have_content('Trusted N') diff --git a/spec/features/boards/reload_boards_on_browser_back_spec.rb b/spec/features/boards/reload_boards_on_browser_back_spec.rb new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4b4bd705a77 --- /dev/null +++ b/spec/features/boards/reload_boards_on_browser_back_spec.rb @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +require 'rails_helper' + +describe 'Ensure Boards do not show stale data on browser back', :js do + let(:project) {create(:project, :public)} + let(:board) {create(:board, project: project)} + let(:user) {create(:user)} + + context 'authorized user' do + before do + project.add_maintainer(user) + + sign_in(user) + + visit project_board_path(project, board) + wait_for_requests + + page.within(first('.board .issue-count-badge-count')) do + expect(page).to have_content('0') + end + end + + it 'created issue is listed on board' do + visit new_project_issue_path(project) + wait_for_requests + + fill_in 'issue_title', with: 'issue should be shown' + + click_button 'Submit issue' + + page.go_back + wait_for_requests + + page.go_back + wait_for_requests + + page.within(first('.board .issue-count-badge-count')) do + expect(page).to have_content('1') + end + + page.within(first('.board-card')) do + issue = project.issues.find_by_title('issue should be shown') + + expect(page).to have_content(issue.to_reference) + expect(page).to have_link(issue.title, href: issue_path(issue)) + end + end + end +end diff --git a/spec/features/calendar_spec.rb b/spec/features/calendar_spec.rb index f08946b0593..aa3ca8923ff 100644 --- a/spec/features/calendar_spec.rb +++ b/spec/features/calendar_spec.rb @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ describe 'Contributions Calendar', :js do end def selected_day_activities(visible: true) - find('.user-calendar-activities', visible: visible).text + find('.tab-pane#activity .user-calendar-activities', visible: visible).text end before do @@ -74,15 +74,16 @@ describe 'Contributions Calendar', :js do describe 'calendar day selection' do before do visit user.username + page.find('.js-activity-tab a').click wait_for_requests end it 'displays calendar' do - expect(page).to have_css('.js-contrib-calendar') + expect(find('.tab-pane#activity')).to have_css('.js-contrib-calendar') end describe 'select calendar day' do - let(:cells) { page.all('.user-contrib-cell') } + let(:cells) { page.all('.tab-pane#activity .user-contrib-cell') } before do cells[0].click @@ -108,6 +109,7 @@ describe 'Contributions Calendar', :js do describe 'deselect calendar day' do before do cells[0].click + page.find('.js-activity-tab a').click wait_for_requests end @@ -122,6 +124,7 @@ describe 'Contributions Calendar', :js do shared_context 'visit user page' do before do visit user.username + page.find('.js-activity-tab a').click wait_for_requests end end @@ -130,12 +133,12 @@ describe 'Contributions Calendar', :js do include_context 'visit user page' it 'displays calendar activity square color for 1 contribution' do - expect(page).to have_selector(get_cell_color_selector(contribution_count), count: 1) + expect(find('.tab-pane#activity')).to have_selector(get_cell_color_selector(contribution_count), count: 1) end it 'displays calendar activity square on the correct date' do today = Date.today.strftime(date_format) - expect(page).to have_selector(get_cell_date_selector(contribution_count, today), count: 1) + expect(find('.tab-pane#activity')).to have_selector(get_cell_date_selector(contribution_count, today), count: 1) end end @@ -150,7 +153,7 @@ describe 'Contributions Calendar', :js do include_context 'visit user page' it 'displays calendar activity log' do - expect(find('.content_list .event-note')).to have_content issue_title + expect(find('.tab-pane#activity .content_list .event-note')).to have_content issue_title end end end @@ -182,17 +185,17 @@ describe 'Contributions Calendar', :js do include_context 'visit user page' it 'displays calendar activity squares for both days' do - expect(page).to have_selector(get_cell_color_selector(1), count: 2) + expect(find('.tab-pane#activity')).to have_selector(get_cell_color_selector(1), count: 2) end it 'displays calendar activity square for yesterday' do yesterday = Date.yesterday.strftime(date_format) - expect(page).to have_selector(get_cell_date_selector(1, yesterday), count: 1) + expect(find('.tab-pane#activity')).to have_selector(get_cell_date_selector(1, yesterday), count: 1) end it 'displays calendar activity square for today' do today = Date.today.strftime(date_format) - expect(page).to have_selector(get_cell_date_selector(1, today), count: 1) + expect(find('.tab-pane#activity')).to have_selector(get_cell_date_selector(1, today), count: 1) end end end diff --git a/spec/features/dashboard/datetime_on_tooltips_spec.rb b/spec/features/dashboard/datetime_on_tooltips_spec.rb index d7234158fa1..0db8093411b 100644 --- a/spec/features/dashboard/datetime_on_tooltips_spec.rb +++ b/spec/features/dashboard/datetime_on_tooltips_spec.rb @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ describe 'Tooltips on .timeago dates', :js do updated_at: created_date, created_at: created_date) sign_in user - visit user_path(user) + visit user_activity_path(user) wait_for_requests() page.find('.js-timeago').hover diff --git a/spec/features/groups/labels/subscription_spec.rb b/spec/features/groups/labels/subscription_spec.rb index d9543bfa97f..22b51b297a6 100644 --- a/spec/features/groups/labels/subscription_spec.rb +++ b/spec/features/groups/labels/subscription_spec.rb @@ -3,7 +3,8 @@ require 'spec_helper' describe 'Labels subscription' do let(:user) { create(:user) } let(:group) { create(:group) } - let!(:feature) { create(:group_label, group: group, title: 'feature') } + let!(:label1) { create(:group_label, group: group, title: 'foo') } + let!(:label2) { create(:group_label, group: group, title: 'bar') } context 'when signed in' do before do @@ -14,9 +15,9 @@ describe 'Labels subscription' do it 'users can subscribe/unsubscribe to group labels', :js do visit group_labels_path(group) - expect(page).to have_content('feature') + expect(page).to have_content(label1.title) - within "#group_label_#{feature.id}" do + within "#group_label_#{label1.id}" do expect(page).not_to have_button 'Unsubscribe' click_button 'Subscribe' @@ -30,15 +31,48 @@ describe 'Labels subscription' do expect(page).not_to have_button 'Unsubscribe' end end + + context 'subscription filter' do + before do + visit group_labels_path(group) + end + + it 'shows only subscribed labels' do + label1.subscribe(user) + + click_subscribed_tab + + page.within('.labels-container') do + expect(page).to have_content label1.title + end + end + + it 'shows no subscribed labels message' do + click_subscribed_tab + + page.within('.labels-container') do + expect(page).not_to have_content label1.title + expect(page).to have_content('You do not have any subscriptions yet') + end + end + end end context 'when not signed in' do - it 'users can not subscribe/unsubscribe to labels' do + before do visit group_labels_path(group) + end - expect(page).to have_content 'feature' + it 'users can not subscribe/unsubscribe to labels' do + expect(page).to have_content label1.title expect(page).not_to have_button('Subscribe') end + + it 'does not show subscribed tab' do + page.within('.nav-tabs') do + expect(page).not_to have_link 'Subscribed' + end + end end def click_link_on_dropdown(text) @@ -48,4 +82,10 @@ describe 'Labels subscription' do find('a.js-subscribe-button', text: text).click end end + + def click_subscribed_tab + page.within('.nav-tabs') do + click_link 'Subscribed' + end + end end diff --git a/spec/features/groups/settings/ci_cd_spec.rb b/spec/features/groups/settings/ci_cd_spec.rb new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d422fd18346 --- /dev/null +++ b/spec/features/groups/settings/ci_cd_spec.rb @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +# frozen_string_literal: true + +require 'spec_helper' + +describe 'Group CI/CD settings' do + include WaitForRequests + + let(:user) {create(:user)} + let(:group) {create(:group)} + + before do + group.add_owner(user) + sign_in(user) + end + + describe 'runners registration token' do + let!(:token) { group.runners_token } + + before do + visit group_settings_ci_cd_path(group) + end + + it 'has a registration token' do + expect(page.find('#registration_token')).to have_content(token) + end + + describe 'reload registration token' do + let(:page_token) { find('#registration_token').text } + + before do + click_button 'Reset runners registration token' + end + + it 'changes registration token' do + expect(page_token).not_to eq token + end + end + end +end diff --git a/spec/features/issuables/close_reopen_report_toggle_spec.rb b/spec/features/issuables/close_reopen_report_toggle_spec.rb index de6f5fe1560..26c44baeb21 100644 --- a/spec/features/issuables/close_reopen_report_toggle_spec.rb +++ b/spec/features/issuables/close_reopen_report_toggle_spec.rb @@ -56,6 +56,24 @@ describe 'Issuables Close/Reopen/Report toggle' do end it_behaves_like 'an issuable close/reopen/report toggle' + + context 'when the issue is closed and locked' do + let(:issuable) { create(:issue, :closed, :locked, project: project) } + + it 'hides the reopen button' do + expect(page).not_to have_link('Reopen issue') + end + + context 'when the issue author is the current user' do + before do + issuable.update(author: user) + end + + it 'hides the reopen button' do + expect(page).not_to have_link('Reopen issue') + end + end + end end context 'when user doesnt have permission to update' do @@ -93,6 +111,28 @@ describe 'Issuables Close/Reopen/Report toggle' do end it_behaves_like 'an issuable close/reopen/report toggle' + + context 'when the merge request is merged' do + let(:issuable) { create(:merge_request, :merged, source_project: project) } + + it 'shows only the `Report abuse` and `Edit` button' do + expect(page).to have_link('Report abuse') + expect(page).to have_link('Edit') + expect(page).not_to have_link('Close merge request') + expect(page).not_to have_link('Reopen merge request') + end + + context 'when the merge request author is the current user' do + let(:issuable) { create(:merge_request, :merged, source_project: project, author: user) } + + it 'shows only the `Edit` button' do + expect(page).to have_link('Edit') + expect(page).not_to have_link('Report abuse') + expect(page).not_to have_link('Close merge request') + expect(page).not_to have_link('Reopen merge request') + end + end + end end context 'when user doesnt have permission to update' do diff --git a/spec/features/issues/filtered_search/dropdown_hint_spec.rb b/spec/features/issues/filtered_search/dropdown_hint_spec.rb index b99c5a7f4e3..0e296ab2109 100644 --- a/spec/features/issues/filtered_search/dropdown_hint_spec.rb +++ b/spec/features/issues/filtered_search/dropdown_hint_spec.rb @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ describe 'Dropdown hint', :js do before do project.add_maintainer(user) create(:issue, project: project) + create(:merge_request, source_project: project, target_project: project) end context 'when user not logged in' do @@ -224,4 +225,21 @@ describe 'Dropdown hint', :js do end end end + + context 'merge request page' do + before do + sign_in(user) + visit project_merge_requests_path(project) + filtered_search.click + end + + it 'shows the WIP menu item and opens the WIP options dropdown' do + click_hint('wip') + + expect(page).to have_css(js_dropdown_hint, visible: false) + expect(page).to have_css('#js-dropdown-wip', visible: true) + expect_tokens([{ name: 'wip' }]) + expect_filtered_search_input_empty + end + end end diff --git a/spec/features/issues/issue_detail_spec.rb b/spec/features/issues/issue_detail_spec.rb index 088ab114df3..76bc93e9766 100644 --- a/spec/features/issues/issue_detail_spec.rb +++ b/spec/features/issues/issue_detail_spec.rb @@ -18,6 +18,23 @@ describe 'Issue Detail', :js do end end + context 'when issue description has xss snippet' do + before do + issue.update!(description: '') + sign_in(user) + visit project_issue_path(project, issue) + wait_for_requests + end + + it 'should encode the description to prevent xss issues' do + page.within('.issuable-details .detail-page-description') do + expect(page).to have_selector('img', count: 1) + expect(find('img')['onerror']).to be_nil + expect(find('img')['src']).to end_with('/a') + end + end + end + context 'when edited by a user who is later deleted' do before do sign_in(user) diff --git a/spec/features/issues/notes_on_issues_spec.rb b/spec/features/issues/notes_on_issues_spec.rb index f08c73f947c..fed77453cbb 100644 --- a/spec/features/issues/notes_on_issues_spec.rb +++ b/spec/features/issues/notes_on_issues_spec.rb @@ -3,6 +3,12 @@ require 'spec_helper' describe 'Create notes on issues', :js do let(:user) { create(:user) } + def submit_comment(text) + fill_in 'note[note]', with: text + click_button 'Comment' + wait_for_requests + end + shared_examples 'notes with reference' do let(:issue) { create(:issue, project: project) } let(:note_text) { "Check #{mention.to_reference}" } @@ -12,10 +18,7 @@ describe 'Create notes on issues', :js do sign_in(user) visit project_issue_path(project, issue) - fill_in 'note[note]', with: note_text - click_button 'Comment' - - wait_for_requests + submit_comment(note_text) end it 'creates a note with reference and cross references the issue' do @@ -74,4 +77,16 @@ describe 'Create notes on issues', :js do let(:mention) { create(:merge_request, source_project: project) } end end + + it 'highlights the current user in a comment' do + project = create(:project) + issue = create(:issue, project: project) + project.add_developer(user) + sign_in(user) + + visit project_issue_path(project, issue) + submit_comment("@#{user.username} note to self") + + expect(page).to have_selector '.gfm-project_member.current-user', text: user.username + end end diff --git a/spec/features/markdown/markdown_spec.rb b/spec/features/markdown/markdown_spec.rb index cac8a5068ec..3b37ede8579 100644 --- a/spec/features/markdown/markdown_spec.rb +++ b/spec/features/markdown/markdown_spec.rb @@ -264,9 +264,9 @@ describe 'GitLab Markdown', :aggregate_failures do @project_wiki = @feat.project_wiki @project_wiki_page = @feat.project_wiki_page - file = Gollum::File.new(@project_wiki.wiki) - expect(file).to receive(:path).and_return('images/example.jpg') - expect(@project_wiki).to receive(:find_file).with('images/example.jpg').and_return(file) + path = 'images/example.jpg' + gitaly_wiki_file = Gitlab::GitalyClient::WikiFile.new(path: path) + expect(@project_wiki).to receive(:find_file).with(path).and_return(Gitlab::Git::WikiFile.new(gitaly_wiki_file)) allow(@project_wiki).to receive(:wiki_base_path) { '/namespace1/gitlabhq/wikis' } @html = markdown(@feat.raw_markdown, { pipeline: :wiki, project_wiki: @project_wiki, page_slug: @project_wiki_page.slug }) diff --git a/spec/features/merge_request/user_comments_on_diff_spec.rb b/spec/features/merge_request/user_comments_on_diff_spec.rb index 441b080bee5..00cf368e8c9 100644 --- a/spec/features/merge_request/user_comments_on_diff_spec.rb +++ b/spec/features/merge_request/user_comments_on_diff_spec.rb @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ describe 'User comments on a diff', :js do click_button('Comment') end - page.within('.files > div:nth-child(3)') do + page.within('.diff-files-holder > div:nth-child(3)') do expect(page).to have_content('Line is wrong') find('.js-btn-vue-toggle-comments').click @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ describe 'User comments on a diff', :js do wait_for_requests - page.within('.files > div:nth-child(2) .note-body > .note-text') do + page.within('.diff-files-holder > div:nth-child(2) .note-body > .note-text') do expect(page).to have_content('Line is correct') end @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ describe 'User comments on a diff', :js do wait_for_requests # Hide the comment. - page.within('.files > div:nth-child(3)') do + page.within('.diff-files-holder > div:nth-child(3)') do find('.js-btn-vue-toggle-comments').click expect(page).not_to have_content('Line is wrong') @@ -71,21 +71,21 @@ describe 'User comments on a diff', :js do # At this moment a user should see only one comment. # The other one should be hidden. - page.within('.files > div:nth-child(2) .note-body > .note-text') do + page.within('.diff-files-holder > div:nth-child(2) .note-body > .note-text') do expect(page).to have_content('Line is correct') end # Show the comment. - page.within('.files > div:nth-child(3)') do + page.within('.diff-files-holder > div:nth-child(3)') do find('.js-btn-vue-toggle-comments').click end # Now both the comments should be shown. - page.within('.files > div:nth-child(3) .note-body > .note-text') do + page.within('.diff-files-holder > div:nth-child(3) .note-body > .note-text') do expect(page).to have_content('Line is wrong') end - page.within('.files > div:nth-child(2) .note-body > .note-text') do + page.within('.diff-files-holder > div:nth-child(2) .note-body > .note-text') do expect(page).to have_content('Line is correct') end @@ -95,11 +95,11 @@ describe 'User comments on a diff', :js do wait_for_requests - page.within('.files > div:nth-child(3) .parallel .note-body > .note-text') do + page.within('.diff-files-holder > div:nth-child(3) .parallel .note-body > .note-text') do expect(page).to have_content('Line is wrong') end - page.within('.files > div:nth-child(2) .parallel .note-body > .note-text') do + page.within('.diff-files-holder > div:nth-child(2) .parallel .note-body > .note-text') do expect(page).to have_content('Line is correct') end end diff --git a/spec/features/merge_request/user_sees_avatar_on_diff_notes_spec.rb b/spec/features/merge_request/user_sees_avatar_on_diff_notes_spec.rb index 428eb414274..d3da8cc6752 100644 --- a/spec/features/merge_request/user_sees_avatar_on_diff_notes_spec.rb +++ b/spec/features/merge_request/user_sees_avatar_on_diff_notes_spec.rb @@ -81,6 +81,8 @@ describe 'Merge request > User sees avatars on diff notes', :js do visit diffs_project_merge_request_path(project, merge_request, view: view) wait_for_requests + + find('.js-toggle-tree-list').click end it 'shows note avatar' do diff --git a/spec/features/merge_request/user_sees_versions_spec.rb b/spec/features/merge_request/user_sees_versions_spec.rb index f42b4dcbb47..92db4f44098 100644 --- a/spec/features/merge_request/user_sees_versions_spec.rb +++ b/spec/features/merge_request/user_sees_versions_spec.rb @@ -110,7 +110,8 @@ describe 'Merge request > User sees versions', :js do diff_id: merge_request_diff3.id, start_sha: '6f6d7e7ed97bb5f0054f2b1df789b39ca89b6ff9' ) - expect(page).to have_content '4 changed files with 15 additions and 6 deletions' + expect(page).to have_content '4 changed files' + expect(page).to have_content '15 additions 6 deletions' expect(page).to have_content 'Not all comments are displayed' position = Gitlab::Diff::Position.new( @@ -131,7 +132,8 @@ describe 'Merge request > User sees versions', :js do end it 'show diff between new and old version' do - expect(page).to have_content '4 changed files with 15 additions and 6 deletions' + expect(page).to have_content '4 changed files' + expect(page).to have_content '15 additions 6 deletions' end it 'returns to latest version when "Show latest version" button is clicked' do @@ -158,7 +160,7 @@ describe 'Merge request > User sees versions', :js do it 'has 0 chages between versions' do page.within '.mr-version-compare-dropdown' do - expect(find('.dropdown-toggle')).to have_content 'version 1' + expect(find('.dropdown-menu-toggle')).to have_content 'version 1' end page.within '.mr-version-dropdown' do @@ -179,7 +181,7 @@ describe 'Merge request > User sees versions', :js do it 'sets the compared versions to be the same' do page.within '.mr-version-compare-dropdown' do - expect(find('.dropdown-toggle')).to have_content 'version 2' + expect(find('.dropdown-menu-toggle')).to have_content 'version 2' end page.within '.mr-version-dropdown' do diff --git a/spec/features/merge_request/user_views_diffs_spec.rb b/spec/features/merge_request/user_views_diffs_spec.rb index b1bfe9e5de3..7f95a1282f9 100644 --- a/spec/features/merge_request/user_views_diffs_spec.rb +++ b/spec/features/merge_request/user_views_diffs_spec.rb @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@ describe 'User views diffs', :js do visit(diffs_project_merge_request_path(project, merge_request)) wait_for_requests + + find('.js-toggle-tree-list').click end shared_examples 'unfold diffs' do diff --git a/spec/features/profiles/user_edit_profile_spec.rb b/spec/features/profiles/user_edit_profile_spec.rb index 206a3a4fe9a..e168bb0fc89 100644 --- a/spec/features/profiles/user_edit_profile_spec.rb +++ b/spec/features/profiles/user_edit_profile_spec.rb @@ -61,83 +61,229 @@ describe 'User edit profile' do end context 'user status', :js do - def select_emoji(emoji_name) + def select_emoji(emoji_name, is_modal = false) + emoji_menu_class = is_modal ? '.js-modal-status-emoji-menu' : '.js-status-emoji-menu' toggle_button = find('.js-toggle-emoji-menu') toggle_button.click - emoji_button = find(%Q{.js-status-emoji-menu .js-emoji-btn gl-emoji[data-name="#{emoji_name}"]}) + emoji_button = find(%Q{#{emoji_menu_class} .js-emoji-btn gl-emoji[data-name="#{emoji_name}"]}) emoji_button.click end - it 'shows the user status form' do - visit(profile_path) + context 'profile edit form' do + it 'shows the user status form' do + visit(profile_path) - expect(page).to have_content('Current status') - end + expect(page).to have_content('Current status') + end - it 'adds emoji to user status' do - emoji = 'biohazard' - visit(profile_path) - select_emoji(emoji) - submit_settings + it 'adds emoji to user status' do + emoji = 'biohazard' + visit(profile_path) + select_emoji(emoji) + submit_settings - visit user_path(user) - within('.cover-status') do - expect(page).to have_emoji(emoji) + visit user_path(user) + within('.cover-status') do + expect(page).to have_emoji(emoji) + end end - end - it 'adds message to user status' do - message = 'I have something to say' - visit(profile_path) - fill_in 'js-status-message-field', with: message - submit_settings + it 'adds message to user status' do + message = 'I have something to say' + visit(profile_path) + fill_in 'js-status-message-field', with: message + submit_settings - visit user_path(user) - within('.cover-status') do - expect(page).to have_emoji('speech_balloon') - expect(page).to have_content message + visit user_path(user) + within('.cover-status') do + expect(page).to have_emoji('speech_balloon') + expect(page).to have_content message + end end - end - it 'adds message and emoji to user status' do - emoji = 'tanabata_tree' - message = 'Playing outside' - visit(profile_path) - select_emoji(emoji) - fill_in 'js-status-message-field', with: message - submit_settings + it 'adds message and emoji to user status' do + emoji = 'tanabata_tree' + message = 'Playing outside' + visit(profile_path) + select_emoji(emoji) + fill_in 'js-status-message-field', with: message + submit_settings - visit user_path(user) - within('.cover-status') do - expect(page).to have_emoji(emoji) - expect(page).to have_content message + visit user_path(user) + within('.cover-status') do + expect(page).to have_emoji(emoji) + expect(page).to have_content message + end end - end - it 'clears the user status' do - user_status = create(:user_status, user: user, message: 'Eating bread', emoji: 'stuffed_flatbread') + it 'clears the user status' do + user_status = create(:user_status, user: user, message: 'Eating bread', emoji: 'stuffed_flatbread') + + visit user_path(user) + within('.cover-status') do + expect(page).to have_emoji(user_status.emoji) + expect(page).to have_content user_status.message + end + + visit(profile_path) + click_button 'js-clear-user-status-button' + submit_settings - visit user_path(user) - within('.cover-status') do - expect(page).to have_emoji(user_status.emoji) - expect(page).to have_content user_status.message + visit user_path(user) + expect(page).not_to have_selector '.cover-status' end - visit(profile_path) - click_button 'js-clear-user-status-button' - submit_settings + it 'displays a default emoji if only message is entered' do + message = 'a status without emoji' + visit(profile_path) + fill_in 'js-status-message-field', with: message - visit user_path(user) - expect(page).not_to have_selector '.cover-status' + within('.js-toggle-emoji-menu') do + expect(page).to have_emoji('speech_balloon') + end + end end - it 'displays a default emoji if only message is entered' do - message = 'a status without emoji' - visit(profile_path) - fill_in 'js-status-message-field', with: message + context 'user menu' do + def open_user_status_modal + find('.header-user-dropdown-toggle').click + + page.within ".header-user" do + click_button 'Set status' + end + end + + def set_user_status_in_modal + page.within "#set-user-status-modal" do + click_button 'Set status' + end + end + + before do + visit root_path(user) + end + + it 'shows the "Set status" menu item in the user menu' do + find('.header-user-dropdown-toggle').click + + page.within ".header-user" do + expect(page).to have_content('Set status') + end + end + + it 'shows the "Edit status" menu item in the user menu' do + user_status = create(:user_status, user: user, message: 'Eating bread', emoji: 'stuffed_flatbread') + visit root_path(user) + + find('.header-user-dropdown-toggle').click + + page.within ".header-user" do + expect(page).to have_emoji(user_status.emoji) + expect(page).to have_content user_status.message + expect(page).to have_content('Edit status') + end + end + + it 'shows user status modal' do + open_user_status_modal + + expect(page.find('#set-user-status-modal')).to be_visible + expect(page).to have_content('Set a status') + end + + it 'adds emoji to user status' do + emoji = 'biohazard' + open_user_status_modal + select_emoji(emoji, true) + set_user_status_in_modal + + visit user_path(user) + within('.cover-status') do + expect(page).to have_emoji(emoji) + end + end + + it 'adds message to user status' do + message = 'I have something to say' + open_user_status_modal + find('.js-status-message-field').native.send_keys(message) + set_user_status_in_modal + + visit user_path(user) + within('.cover-status') do + expect(page).to have_emoji('speech_balloon') + expect(page).to have_content message + end + end + + it 'adds message and emoji to user status' do + emoji = 'tanabata_tree' + message = 'Playing outside' + open_user_status_modal + select_emoji(emoji, true) + find('.js-status-message-field').native.send_keys(message) + set_user_status_in_modal + + visit user_path(user) + within('.cover-status') do + expect(page).to have_emoji(emoji) + expect(page).to have_content message + end + end + + it 'clears the user status with the "X" button' do + user_status = create(:user_status, user: user, message: 'Eating bread', emoji: 'stuffed_flatbread') + + visit user_path(user) + within('.cover-status') do + expect(page).to have_emoji(user_status.emoji) + expect(page).to have_content user_status.message + end + + find('.header-user-dropdown-toggle').click + + page.within ".header-user" do + click_button 'Edit status' + end + + find('.js-clear-user-status-button').click + set_user_status_in_modal + + visit user_path(user) + expect(page).not_to have_selector '.cover-status' + end + + it 'clears the user status with the "Remove status" button' do + user_status = create(:user_status, user: user, message: 'Eating bread', emoji: 'stuffed_flatbread') + + visit user_path(user) + within('.cover-status') do + expect(page).to have_emoji(user_status.emoji) + expect(page).to have_content user_status.message + end + + find('.header-user-dropdown-toggle').click + + page.within ".header-user" do + click_button 'Edit status' + end + + page.within "#set-user-status-modal" do + click_button 'Remove status' + end + + visit user_path(user) + expect(page).not_to have_selector '.cover-status' + end + + it 'displays a default emoji if only message is entered' do + message = 'a status without emoji' + open_user_status_modal + find('.js-status-message-field').native.send_keys(message) - within('.js-toggle-emoji-menu') do - expect(page).to have_emoji('speech_balloon') + within('.js-toggle-emoji-menu') do + expect(page).to have_emoji('speech_balloon') + end end end end diff --git a/spec/features/profiles/user_manages_applications_spec.rb b/spec/features/profiles/user_manages_applications_spec.rb index 387584fef62..34aaab240cc 100644 --- a/spec/features/profiles/user_manages_applications_spec.rb +++ b/spec/features/profiles/user_manages_applications_spec.rb @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ describe 'User manages applications' do click_on 'Save application' expect(page).to have_content 'Application: test' - expect(page).to have_content 'Application Id' + expect(page).to have_content 'Application ID' expect(page).to have_content 'Secret' click_on 'Edit' @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ describe 'User manages applications' do click_on 'Save application' expect(page).to have_content 'test_changed' - expect(page).to have_content 'Application Id' + expect(page).to have_content 'Application ID' expect(page).to have_content 'Secret' visit applications_profile_path diff --git a/spec/features/projects/clusters/gcp_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/clusters/gcp_spec.rb index edc763ad0ad..8b92b9fc869 100644 --- a/spec/features/projects/clusters/gcp_spec.rb +++ b/spec/features/projects/clusters/gcp_spec.rb @@ -84,10 +84,8 @@ describe 'Gcp Cluster', :js do it_behaves_like 'valid cluster gcp form' - context 'rbac_clusters feature flag is enabled' do + context 'RBAC is enabled for the cluster' do before do - stub_feature_flags(rbac_clusters: true) - check 'cluster_provider_gcp_attributes_legacy_abac' end diff --git a/spec/features/projects/clusters/user_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/clusters/user_spec.rb index 2b4998ed5ac..9ae1dba60b5 100644 --- a/spec/features/projects/clusters/user_spec.rb +++ b/spec/features/projects/clusters/user_spec.rb @@ -44,10 +44,8 @@ describe 'User Cluster', :js do it_behaves_like 'valid cluster user form' - context 'rbac_clusters feature flag is enabled' do + context 'RBAC is enabled for the cluster' do before do - stub_feature_flags(rbac_clusters: true) - check 'cluster_platform_kubernetes_attributes_authorization_type' end diff --git a/spec/features/projects/environments/environment_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/environments/environment_spec.rb index 4c5dda29fee..70e0879dd81 100644 --- a/spec/features/projects/environments/environment_spec.rb +++ b/spec/features/projects/environments/environment_spec.rb @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ describe 'Environment' do context 'with manual action' do let(:action) do create(:ci_build, :manual, pipeline: pipeline, - name: 'deploy to production') + name: 'deploy to production', environment: environment.name) end context 'when user has ability to trigger deployment' do @@ -73,12 +73,16 @@ describe 'Environment' do expect(page).to have_link(action.name.humanize) end - it 'does allow to play manual action' do + it 'does allow to play manual action', :js do expect(action).to be_manual + find('button.dropdown').click + expect { click_link(action.name.humanize) } .not_to change { Ci::Pipeline.count } + wait_for_all_requests + expect(page).to have_content(action.name) expect(action.reload).to be_pending end @@ -165,10 +169,10 @@ describe 'Environment' do name: action.ref, project: project) end - it 'allows to stop environment' do + it 'allows to stop environment', :js do click_button('Stop') click_button('Stop environment') # confirm modal - + wait_for_all_requests expect(page).to have_content('close_app') end end diff --git a/spec/features/projects/fork_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/fork_spec.rb index cd5fef8238e..7c71b4c52e0 100644 --- a/spec/features/projects/fork_spec.rb +++ b/spec/features/projects/fork_spec.rb @@ -53,6 +53,18 @@ describe 'Project fork' do expect(current_path).to have_content(/#{user.namespace.name}/i) end + it 'shows avatars when Gravatar is disabled' do + stub_application_setting(gravatar_enabled: false) + + visit project_path(project) + + click_link 'Fork' + + page.within('.fork-thumbnail-container') do + expect(page).to have_css('div.identicon') + end + end + it 'shows the forked project on the list' do visit project_path(project) diff --git a/spec/features/projects/import_export/export_file_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/import_export/export_file_spec.rb index a2b96514d64..f76f9ba7577 100644 --- a/spec/features/projects/import_export/export_file_spec.rb +++ b/spec/features/projects/import_export/export_file_spec.rb @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ describe 'Import/Export - project export integration test', :js do let(:export_path) { "#{Dir.tmpdir}/import_file_spec" } let(:config_hash) { YAML.load_file(Gitlab::ImportExport.config_file).deep_stringify_keys } - let(:sensitive_words) { %w[pass secret token key] } + let(:sensitive_words) { %w[pass secret token key encrypted] } let(:safe_list) do { token: [ProjectHook, Ci::Trigger, CommitStatus], diff --git a/spec/features/projects/import_export/import_file_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/import_export/import_file_spec.rb index 65c68277167..28ae90bc0de 100644 --- a/spec/features/projects/import_export/import_file_spec.rb +++ b/spec/features/projects/import_export/import_file_spec.rb @@ -21,8 +21,9 @@ describe 'Import/Export - project import integration test', :js do context 'when selecting the namespace' do let(:user) { create(:admin) } let!(:namespace) { user.namespace } - let(:project_name) { 'Test Project Name' + SecureRandom.hex } - let(:project_path) { 'test-project-path' + SecureRandom.hex } + let(:randomHex) { SecureRandom.hex } + let(:project_name) { 'Test Project Name' + randomHex } + let(:project_path) { 'test-project-name' + randomHex } context 'prefilled the path' do it 'user imports an exported project successfully' do @@ -30,7 +31,6 @@ describe 'Import/Export - project import integration test', :js do select2(namespace.id, from: '#project_namespace_id') fill_in :project_name, with: project_name, visible: true - fill_in :project_path, with: project_path, visible: true click_import_project_tab click_link 'GitLab export' @@ -79,7 +79,6 @@ describe 'Import/Export - project import integration test', :js do select2(user.namespace.id, from: '#project_namespace_id') fill_in :project_name, with: project.name, visible: true - fill_in :project_path, with: project.path, visible: true click_import_project_tab click_link 'GitLab export' attach_file('file', file) diff --git a/spec/features/projects/jobs/user_browses_job_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/jobs/user_browses_job_spec.rb index 2d791947ee9..fc7b78ac21f 100644 --- a/spec/features/projects/jobs/user_browses_job_spec.rb +++ b/spec/features/projects/jobs/user_browses_job_spec.rb @@ -16,7 +16,9 @@ describe 'User browses a job', :js do visit(project_job_path(project, build)) end - it 'erases the job log' do + it 'erases the job log', :js do + wait_for_requests + expect(page).to have_content("Job ##{build.id}") expect(page).to have_css('#build-trace') @@ -29,18 +31,17 @@ describe 'User browses a job', :js do expect(build.artifacts_file.exists?).to be_falsy expect(build.artifacts_metadata.exists?).to be_falsy - page.within('.erased') do - expect(page).to have_content('Job has been erased') - end + expect(page).to have_content('Job has been erased') end context 'with a failed job' do let!(:build) { create(:ci_build, :failed, :trace_artifact, pipeline: pipeline) } it 'displays the failure reason' do + wait_for_all_requests within('.builds-container') do build_link = first('.build-job > a') - expect(build_link['data-title']).to eq('test - failed - (unknown failure)') + expect(build_link['data-original-title']).to eq('test - failed - (unknown failure)') end end end @@ -49,9 +50,10 @@ describe 'User browses a job', :js do let!(:build) { create(:ci_build, :failed, :retried, :trace_artifact, pipeline: pipeline) } it 'displays the failure reason and retried label' do + wait_for_all_requests within('.builds-container') do build_link = first('.build-job > a') - expect(build_link['data-title']).to eq('test - failed - (unknown failure) (retried)') + expect(build_link['data-original-title']).to eq('test - failed - (unknown failure) (retried)') end end end diff --git a/spec/features/projects/jobs_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/jobs_spec.rb index d0bf4975b81..9fe56d840e1 100644 --- a/spec/features/projects/jobs_spec.rb +++ b/spec/features/projects/jobs_spec.rb @@ -134,23 +134,25 @@ describe 'Jobs', :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state do expect(page).to have_content pipeline.commit.title end - it 'shows active job' do + it 'shows active job', :js do visit project_job_path(project, job) + wait_for_requests expect(page).to have_selector('.build-job.active') end end - context 'sidebar' do + context 'sidebar', :js do let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :success, :trace_live, pipeline: pipeline, name: '<img src=x onerror=alert(document.domain)>') } before do visit project_job_path(project, job) + wait_for_requests end it 'renders escaped tooltip name' do page.within('aside.right-sidebar') do - expect(find('.active.build-job a')['data-title']).to eq('<img src="x"> - passed') + expect(find('.active.build-job a')['data-original-title']).to eq('<img src=x onerror=alert(document.domain)> - passed') end end end @@ -367,39 +369,167 @@ describe 'Jobs', :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state do end end - context 'when job starts environment' do - let(:environment) { create(:environment, project: project) } - let(:pipeline) { create(:ci_pipeline, project: project) } + context 'when job starts environment', :js do + let(:environment) { create(:environment, name: 'production', project: project) } - context 'job is successfull and has deployment' do - let(:deployment) { create(:deployment) } - let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :success, :trace_artifact, environment: environment.name, deployments: [deployment], pipeline: pipeline) } + context 'job is successful and has deployment' do + let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :success, :trace_live, environment: environment.name, pipeline: pipeline) } + let!(:deployment) { create(:deployment, environment: environment, project: environment.project, deployable: build) } - it 'shows a link for the job' do - visit project_job_path(project, job) + before do + visit project_job_path(project, build) + wait_for_requests + # scroll to the top of the page first + execute_script "window.scrollTo(0,0)" + end + it 'shows a link for the job' do expect(page).to have_link environment.name end + + it 'shows deployment message' do + expect(page).to have_content 'This job is the most recent deployment' + expect(find('.js-environment-link')['href']).to match("environments/#{environment.id}") + end end context 'job is complete and not successful' do - let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :failed, :trace_artifact, environment: environment.name, pipeline: pipeline) } + let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :failed, :trace_artifact, environment: environment.name, pipeline: pipeline) } it 'shows a link for the job' do - visit project_job_path(project, job) + visit project_job_path(project, build) + wait_for_requests + # scroll to the top of the page first + execute_script "window.scrollTo(0,0)" expect(page).to have_link environment.name + expect(find('.js-environment-link')['href']).to match("environments/#{environment.id}") end end - context 'job creates a new deployment' do - let!(:deployment) { create(:deployment, environment: environment, sha: project.commit.id) } - let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :success, :trace_artifact, environment: environment.name, pipeline: pipeline) } + context 'deployment still not finished' do + let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :success, environment: environment.name, pipeline: pipeline) } it 'shows a link to latest deployment' do - visit project_job_path(project, job) + visit project_job_path(project, build) + wait_for_all_requests + # scroll to the top of the page first + execute_script "window.scrollTo(0,0)" + + expect(page).to have_link environment.name + expect(page).to have_content 'This job is creating a deployment' + expect(find('.js-environment-link')['href']).to match("environments/#{environment.id}") + end + end + end + + describe 'environment info in job view', :js do + before do + visit project_job_path(project, job) + wait_for_requests + # scroll to the top of the page first + execute_script "window.scrollTo(0,0)" + end + + context 'job with outdated deployment' do + let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :success, :trace_artifact, environment: 'staging', pipeline: pipeline) } + let(:second_build) { create(:ci_build, :success, :trace_artifact, environment: 'staging', pipeline: pipeline) } + let(:environment) { create(:environment, name: 'staging', project: project) } + let!(:first_deployment) { create(:deployment, environment: environment, deployable: job) } + let!(:second_deployment) { create(:deployment, environment: environment, deployable: second_build) } + + it 'shows deployment message' do + expected_text = 'This job is an out-of-date deployment ' \ + "to staging. View the most recent deployment ##{second_deployment.iid}." + + expect(page).to have_css('.environment-information', text: expected_text) + end + + it 'renders a link to the most recent deployment' do + expect(find('.js-environment-link')['href']).to match("environments/#{environment.id}") + expect(find('.js-job-deployment-link')['href']).to include(second_deployment.deployable.project.path, second_deployment.deployable_id.to_s) + end + end + + context 'job failed to deploy' do + let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :failed, :trace_artifact, environment: 'staging', pipeline: pipeline) } + let!(:environment) { create(:environment, name: 'staging', project: project) } + + it 'shows deployment message' do + expected_text = 'The deployment of this job to staging did not succeed.' + + expect(page).to have_css( + '.environment-information', text: expected_text) + end + end + + context 'job will deploy' do + let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :running, :trace_live, environment: 'staging', pipeline: pipeline) } + + context 'when environment exists' do + let!(:environment) { create(:environment, name: 'staging', project: project) } + + it 'shows deployment message' do + expected_text = 'This job is creating a deployment to staging' + + expect(page).to have_css( + '.environment-information', text: expected_text) + expect(find('.js-environment-link')['href']).to match("environments/#{environment.id}") + end + + context 'when it has deployment' do + let!(:deployment) { create(:deployment, environment: environment) } + + it 'shows that deployment will be overwritten' do + expected_text = 'This job is creating a deployment to staging' + + expect(page).to have_css( + '.environment-information', text: expected_text) + expect(page).to have_css( + '.environment-information', text: 'latest deployment') + expect(find('.js-environment-link')['href']).to match("environments/#{environment.id}") + end + end + end + + context 'when environment does not exist' do + let!(:environment) { create(:environment, name: 'staging', project: project) } + + it 'shows deployment message' do + expected_text = 'This job is creating a deployment to staging' + + expect(page).to have_css( + '.environment-information', text: expected_text) + expect(page).not_to have_css( + '.environment-information', text: 'latest deployment') + expect(find('.js-environment-link')['href']).to match("environments/#{environment.id}") + end + end + end + + context 'job that failed to deploy and environment has not been created' do + let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :failed, :trace_artifact, environment: 'staging', pipeline: pipeline) } + let!(:environment) { create(:environment, name: 'staging', project: project) } + + it 'shows deployment message' do + expected_text = 'The deployment of this job to staging did not succeed' + + expect(page).to have_css( + '.environment-information', text: expected_text) + end + end + + context 'job that will deploy and environment has not been created' do + let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :running, :trace_live, environment: 'staging', pipeline: pipeline) } + let!(:environment) { create(:environment, name: 'staging', project: project) } + + it 'shows deployment message' do + expected_text = 'This job is creating a deployment to staging' - expect(page).to have_link('latest deployment') + expect(page).to have_css( + '.environment-information', text: expected_text) + expect(page).not_to have_css( + '.environment-information', text: 'latest deployment') end end end @@ -412,7 +542,7 @@ describe 'Jobs', :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state do visit project_job_path(project, job) end - it 'shows manual action empty state' do + it 'shows manual action empty state', :js do expect(page).to have_content(job.detailed_status(user).illustration[:title]) expect(page).to have_content('This job requires a manual action') expect(page).to have_content('This job depends on a user to trigger its process. Often they are used to deploy code to production environments') @@ -436,14 +566,14 @@ describe 'Jobs', :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state do visit project_job_path(project, job) end - it 'shows empty state' do + it 'shows empty state', :js do expect(page).to have_content(job.detailed_status(user).illustration[:title]) expect(page).to have_content('This job has not been triggered yet') expect(page).to have_content('This job depends on upstream jobs that need to succeed in order for this job to be triggered') end end - context 'Pending job' do + context 'Pending job', :js do let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :pending, pipeline: pipeline) } before do @@ -470,7 +600,7 @@ describe 'Jobs', :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state do end end - context 'without log' do + context 'without log', :js do let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :canceled, pipeline: pipeline) } before do @@ -485,7 +615,7 @@ describe 'Jobs', :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state do end end - context 'Skipped job' do + context 'Skipped job', :js do let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :skipped, pipeline: pipeline) } before do @@ -499,7 +629,7 @@ describe 'Jobs', :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state do end end - context 'when job is failed but has no trace' do + context 'when job is failed but has no trace', :js do let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :failed, pipeline: pipeline) } it 'renders empty state' do diff --git a/spec/features/projects/settings/pipelines_settings_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/settings/pipelines_settings_spec.rb index 30b0a5578ea..6f8ec0015ad 100644 --- a/spec/features/projects/settings/pipelines_settings_spec.rb +++ b/spec/features/projects/settings/pipelines_settings_spec.rb @@ -137,5 +137,29 @@ describe "Projects > Settings > Pipelines settings" do end end end + + describe 'runners registration token' do + let!(:token) { project.runners_token } + + before do + visit project_settings_ci_cd_path(project) + end + + it 'has a registration token' do + expect(page.find('#registration_token')).to have_content(token) + end + + describe 'reload registration token' do + let(:page_token) { find('#registration_token').text } + + before do + click_button 'Reset runners registration token' + end + + it 'changes registration token' do + expect(page_token).not_to eq token + end + end + end end end diff --git a/spec/features/projects/wiki/user_views_wiki_page_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/wiki/user_views_wiki_page_spec.rb index 747406efc8b..9a4ce426e69 100644 --- a/spec/features/projects/wiki/user_views_wiki_page_spec.rb +++ b/spec/features/projects/wiki/user_views_wiki_page_spec.rb @@ -83,12 +83,13 @@ describe 'User views a wiki page' do end it 'shows a file stored in a page' do - gollum_file_double = double('Gollum::File', - mime_type: 'image/jpeg', - name: 'images/image.jpg', - path: 'images/image.jpg', - raw_data: '') - wiki_file = Gitlab::Git::WikiFile.new(gollum_file_double) + raw_file = Gitlab::GitalyClient::WikiFile.new( + mime_type: 'image/jpeg', + name: 'images/image.jpg', + path: 'images/image.jpg', + raw_data: '' + ) + wiki_file = Gitlab::Git::WikiFile.new(raw_file) allow(wiki_file).to receive(:mime_type).and_return('image/jpeg') allow_any_instance_of(ProjectWiki).to receive(:find_file).with('image.jpg', nil).and_return(wiki_file) diff --git a/spec/features/search/user_uses_search_filters_spec.rb b/spec/features/search/user_uses_search_filters_spec.rb index 66afe163447..0725ff178ac 100644 --- a/spec/features/search/user_uses_search_filters_spec.rb +++ b/spec/features/search/user_uses_search_filters_spec.rb @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ describe 'User uses search filters', :js do visit(search_path) end - context' when filtering by group' do + context 'when filtering by group' do it 'shows group projects' do find('.js-search-group-dropdown').click @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ describe 'User uses search filters', :js do end end - context' when filtering by project' do + context 'when filtering by project' do it 'shows a project' do page.within('.project-filter') do find('.js-search-project-dropdown').click diff --git a/spec/features/users/overview_spec.rb b/spec/features/users/overview_spec.rb new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..11f357cbaa5 --- /dev/null +++ b/spec/features/users/overview_spec.rb @@ -0,0 +1,123 @@ +require 'spec_helper' + +describe 'Overview tab on a user profile', :js do + let(:user) { create(:user) } + let(:contributed_project) { create(:project, :public, :repository) } + + def push_code_contribution + event = create(:push_event, project: contributed_project, author: user) + + create(:push_event_payload, + event: event, + commit_from: '11f9ac0a48b62cef25eedede4c1819964f08d5ce', + commit_to: '1cf19a015df3523caf0a1f9d40c98a267d6a2fc2', + commit_count: 3, + ref: 'master') + end + + before do + sign_in user + end + + describe 'activities section' do + shared_context 'visit overview tab' do + before do + visit user.username + page.find('.js-overview-tab a').click + wait_for_requests + end + end + + describe 'user has no activities' do + include_context 'visit overview tab' + + it 'does not show any entries in the list of activities' do + page.within('.activities-block') do + expect(page).not_to have_selector('.event-item') + end + end + + it 'does not show a link to the activity list' do + expect(find('#js-overview .activities-block')).to have_selector('.js-view-all', visible: false) + end + end + + describe 'user has 3 activities' do + before do + 3.times { push_code_contribution } + end + + include_context 'visit overview tab' + + it 'display 3 entries in the list of activities' do + expect(find('#js-overview')).to have_selector('.event-item', count: 3) + end + end + + describe 'user has 10 activities' do + before do + 10.times { push_code_contribution } + end + + include_context 'visit overview tab' + + it 'displays 5 entries in the list of activities' do + expect(find('#js-overview')).to have_selector('.event-item', count: 5) + end + + it 'shows a link to the activity list' do + expect(find('#js-overview .activities-block')).to have_selector('.js-view-all', visible: true) + end + + it 'links to the activity tab' do + page.within('.activities-block') do + find('.js-view-all').click + wait_for_requests + expect(URI.parse(current_url).path).to eq("/users/#{user.username}/activity") + end + end + end + end + + describe 'projects section' do + shared_context 'visit overview tab' do + before do + visit user.username + page.find('.js-overview-tab a').click + wait_for_requests + end + end + + describe 'user has no personal projects' do + include_context 'visit overview tab' + + it 'it shows an empty project list with an info message' do + page.within('.projects-block') do + expect(page).to have_content('No projects found') + expect(page).not_to have_selector('.project-row') + end + end + + it 'does not show a link to the project list' do + expect(find('#js-overview .projects-block')).to have_selector('.js-view-all', visible: false) + end + end + + describe 'user has a personal project' do + let(:private_project) { create(:project, :private, namespace: user.namespace, creator: user) { |p| p.add_maintainer(user) } } + let!(:private_event) { create(:event, project: private_project, author: user) } + + include_context 'visit overview tab' + + it 'it shows one entry in the list of projects' do + page.within('.projects-block') do + expect(page).to have_selector('.project-row', count: 1) + end + end + + it 'shows a link to the project list' do + expect(find('#js-overview .projects-block')).to have_selector('.js-view-all', visible: true) + end + end + end +end diff --git a/spec/features/users/show_spec.rb b/spec/features/users/show_spec.rb index bc07ab48c39..86379164cf0 100644 --- a/spec/features/users/show_spec.rb +++ b/spec/features/users/show_spec.rb @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ describe 'User page' do visit(user_path(user)) page.within '.nav-links' do + expect(page).to have_link('Overview') expect(page).to have_link('Activity') expect(page).to have_link('Groups') expect(page).to have_link('Contributed projects') @@ -44,6 +45,7 @@ describe 'User page' do visit(user_path(user)) page.within '.nav-links' do + expect(page).to have_link('Overview') expect(page).to have_link('Activity') expect(page).to have_link('Groups') expect(page).to have_link('Contributed projects') diff --git a/spec/finders/group_labels_finder_spec.rb b/spec/finders/group_labels_finder_spec.rb index ef68fc105e4..7bdd312eff0 100644 --- a/spec/finders/group_labels_finder_spec.rb +++ b/spec/finders/group_labels_finder_spec.rb @@ -4,29 +4,38 @@ require 'spec_helper' describe GroupLabelsFinder, '#execute' do let!(:group) { create(:group) } + let!(:user) { create(:user) } let!(:label1) { create(:group_label, title: 'Foo', description: 'Lorem ipsum', group: group) } let!(:label2) { create(:group_label, title: 'Bar', description: 'Fusce consequat', group: group) } it 'returns all group labels sorted by name if no params' do - result = described_class.new(group).execute + result = described_class.new(user, group).execute expect(result.to_a).to match_array([label2, label1]) end it 'returns all group labels sorted by name desc' do - result = described_class.new(group, sort: 'name_desc').execute + result = described_class.new(user, group, sort: 'name_desc').execute expect(result.to_a).to match_array([label2, label1]) end - it 'returns group labels that march search' do - result = described_class.new(group, search: 'Foo').execute + it 'returns group labels that match search' do + result = described_class.new(user, group, search: 'Foo').execute expect(result.to_a).to match_array([label1]) end + it 'returns group labels user subscribed to' do + label2.subscribe(user) + + result = described_class.new(user, group, subscribed: 'true').execute + + expect(result.to_a).to match_array([label2]) + end + it 'returns second page of labels' do - result = described_class.new(group, page: '2').execute + result = described_class.new(user, group, page: '2').execute expect(result.to_a).to match_array([]) end diff --git a/spec/finders/issues_finder_spec.rb b/spec/finders/issues_finder_spec.rb index 07a2fa86dd7..d78451112ec 100644 --- a/spec/finders/issues_finder_spec.rb +++ b/spec/finders/issues_finder_spec.rb @@ -56,6 +56,14 @@ describe IssuesFinder do end end + context 'filtering by no assignee' do + let(:params) { { assignee_id: 0 } } + + it 'returns issues not assign to any assignee' do + expect(issues).to contain_exactly(issue4) + end + end + context 'filtering by group_id' do let(:params) { { group_id: group.id } } diff --git a/spec/finders/labels_finder_spec.rb b/spec/finders/labels_finder_spec.rb index f5cec8e349a..9abc52aa664 100644 --- a/spec/finders/labels_finder_spec.rb +++ b/spec/finders/labels_finder_spec.rb @@ -210,5 +210,15 @@ describe LabelsFinder do expect(finder.execute).to eq [project_label_1] end end + + context 'filter by subscription' do + it 'returns labels user subscribed to' do + project_label_1.subscribe(user) + + finder = described_class.new(user, subscribed: 'true') + + expect(finder.execute).to eq [project_label_1] + end + end end end diff --git a/spec/finders/merge_requests_finder_spec.rb b/spec/finders/merge_requests_finder_spec.rb index 35d0eeda8f6..ff4c6b8dd42 100644 --- a/spec/finders/merge_requests_finder_spec.rb +++ b/spec/finders/merge_requests_finder_spec.rb @@ -3,25 +3,47 @@ require 'spec_helper' describe MergeRequestsFinder do include ProjectForksHelper + # We need to explicitly permit Gitaly N+1s because of the specs that use + # :request_store. Gitaly N+1 detection is only enabled when :request_store is, + # but we don't care about potential N+1s when we're just creating several + # projects in the setup phase. + def create_project_without_n_plus_1(*args) + Gitlab::GitalyClient.allow_n_plus_1_calls do + create(:project, :public, *args) + end + end + let(:user) { create :user } let(:user2) { create :user } let(:group) { create(:group) } let(:subgroup) { create(:group, parent: group) } - let(:project1) { create(:project, :public, group: group) } - let(:project2) { fork_project(project1, user) } + let(:project1) { create_project_without_n_plus_1(group: group) } + let(:project2) do + Gitlab::GitalyClient.allow_n_plus_1_calls do + fork_project(project1, user) + end + end let(:project3) do - p = fork_project(project1, user) - p.update!(archived: true) - p + Gitlab::GitalyClient.allow_n_plus_1_calls do + p = fork_project(project1, user) + p.update!(archived: true) + p + end end - let(:project4) { create(:project, :public, group: subgroup) } + let(:project4) { create_project_without_n_plus_1(group: subgroup) } + let(:project5) { create_project_without_n_plus_1(group: subgroup) } + let(:project6) { create_project_without_n_plus_1(group: subgroup) } let!(:merge_request1) { create(:merge_request, :simple, author: user, source_project: project2, target_project: project1) } let!(:merge_request2) { create(:merge_request, :conflict, author: user, source_project: project2, target_project: project1, state: 'closed') } - let!(:merge_request3) { create(:merge_request, :simple, author: user, source_project: project2, target_project: project2, state: 'locked') } - let!(:merge_request4) { create(:merge_request, :simple, author: user, source_project: project3, target_project: project3) } - let!(:merge_request5) { create(:merge_request, :simple, author: user, source_project: project4, target_project: project4) } + let!(:merge_request3) { create(:merge_request, :simple, author: user, source_project: project2, target_project: project2, state: 'locked', title: 'thing WIP thing') } + let!(:merge_request4) { create(:merge_request, :simple, author: user, source_project: project3, target_project: project3, title: 'WIP thing') } + let!(:merge_request5) { create(:merge_request, :simple, author: user, source_project: project4, target_project: project4, title: '[WIP]') } + let!(:merge_request6) { create(:merge_request, :simple, author: user, source_project: project5, target_project: project5, title: 'WIP: thing') } + let!(:merge_request7) { create(:merge_request, :simple, author: user, source_project: project6, target_project: project6, title: 'wip thing') } + let!(:merge_request8) { create(:merge_request, :simple, author: user, source_project: project1, target_project: project1, title: '[wip] thing') } + let!(:merge_request9) { create(:merge_request, :simple, author: user, source_project: project1, target_project: project2, title: 'wip: thing') } before do project1.add_maintainer(user) @@ -29,19 +51,21 @@ describe MergeRequestsFinder do project3.add_developer(user) project2.add_developer(user2) project4.add_developer(user) + project5.add_developer(user) + project6.add_developer(user) end describe "#execute" do it 'filters by scope' do params = { scope: 'authored', state: 'opened' } merge_requests = described_class.new(user, params).execute - expect(merge_requests.size).to eq(3) + expect(merge_requests.size).to eq(7) end it 'filters by project' do params = { project_id: project1.id, scope: 'authored', state: 'opened' } merge_requests = described_class.new(user, params).execute - expect(merge_requests.size).to eq(1) + expect(merge_requests.size).to eq(2) end it 'filters by group' do @@ -49,7 +73,7 @@ describe MergeRequestsFinder do merge_requests = described_class.new(user, params).execute - expect(merge_requests.size).to eq(2) + expect(merge_requests.size).to eq(3) end it 'filters by group including subgroups', :nested_groups do @@ -57,13 +81,13 @@ describe MergeRequestsFinder do merge_requests = described_class.new(user, params).execute - expect(merge_requests.size).to eq(3) + expect(merge_requests.size).to eq(6) end it 'filters by non_archived' do params = { non_archived: true } merge_requests = described_class.new(user, params).execute - expect(merge_requests.size).to eq(4) + expect(merge_requests.size).to eq(8) end it 'filters by iid' do @@ -98,6 +122,36 @@ describe MergeRequestsFinder do expect(merge_requests).to contain_exactly(merge_request3) end + it 'filters by wip' do + params = { wip: 'yes' } + + merge_requests = described_class.new(user, params).execute + + expect(merge_requests).to contain_exactly(merge_request4, merge_request5, merge_request6, merge_request7, merge_request8, merge_request9) + end + + it 'filters by not wip' do + params = { wip: 'no' } + + merge_requests = described_class.new(user, params).execute + + expect(merge_requests).to contain_exactly(merge_request1, merge_request2, merge_request3) + end + + it 'returns all items if no valid wip param exists' do + params = { wip: '' } + + merge_requests = described_class.new(user, params).execute + + expect(merge_requests).to contain_exactly(merge_request1, merge_request2, merge_request3, merge_request4, merge_request5, merge_request6, merge_request7, merge_request8, merge_request9) + end + + it 'adds wip to scalar params' do + scalar_params = described_class.scalar_params + + expect(scalar_params).to include(:wip, :assignee_id) + end + context 'filtering by group milestone' do let!(:group) { create(:group, :public) } let(:group_milestone) { create(:milestone, group: group) } @@ -207,7 +261,7 @@ describe MergeRequestsFinder do it 'returns the number of rows for the default state' do finder = described_class.new(user) - expect(finder.row_count).to eq(3) + expect(finder.row_count).to eq(7) end it 'returns the number of rows for a given state' do diff --git a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/job/job_details.json b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/job/job_details.json index 70d59c6e621..07e674216fa 100644 --- a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/job/job_details.json +++ b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/job/job_details.json @@ -4,6 +4,9 @@ ], "description": "An extension of job.json with more detailed information", "required": [ + "artifact", + "runner", + "runners", "has_trace" ], "properties": { @@ -12,7 +15,7 @@ "trigger": { "$ref": "trigger.json" }, "deployment_status": { "$ref": "deployment_status.json" }, "runner": { "$ref": "runner.json" }, - "runners": { "type": "runners.json" }, + "runners": { "$ref": "runners.json" }, "has_trace": { "type": "boolean" } } } diff --git a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/job/runners.json b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/job/runners.json index bebb0c88652..646bfd3a82d 100644 --- a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/job/runners.json +++ b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/job/runners.json @@ -8,6 +8,5 @@ "online": { "type": "boolean" }, "available": { "type": "boolean" }, "settings_path": { "type": "string" } - }, - "additionalProperties": false + } } diff --git a/spec/fixtures/codequality/codequality.json b/spec/fixtures/codequality/codequality.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..89cc4b46521 --- /dev/null +++ b/spec/fixtures/codequality/codequality.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +[{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `simulateDrag` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a995a617b0ce0599b6d0a5649a308a8e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/test_utils/simulate_drag.js","lines":{"begin":75,"end":137}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `simulateEvent` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e50b54fce33185efbb17d1c0d210b439","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/test_utils/simulate_drag.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":37}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `simulateDrag` has 51 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"75ffb8892dac22a9d50822bc69339ab2","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/test_utils/simulate_drag.js","lines":{"begin":75,"end":137}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1224000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"40f188d222bd1f110e8c11f08ec77c3f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/blob/3d_viewer/index.js","lines":{"begin":10,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 60 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"95b71f07d08eb9e2368568c6d872f677","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/blob/blob_file_dropzone.js","lines":{"begin":21,"end":88}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1440000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"`FileTemplateMediator` has 29 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"02a64abfacf06440f6504888503fe571","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/blob/file_template_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":11,"end":246}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2100000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ede6d8c5878fbfdda2348d1c6a808f4b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issuable_form.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":57}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `initTargetBranchDropdown` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"748b8a39304544f015c0abcbee9b929c","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issuable_form.js","lines":{"begin":116,"end":147}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `start` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b0272210e1d618fe95522ee47f652308","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/smart_interval.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":65}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `render` has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ceb92ce0f43dbe13431f1f07d5787aff","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_shared/components/tabs/tabs.js","lines":{"begin":35,"end":75}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":912000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `file_icon_map.js` has 587 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"33d443c482c7a34a3a721ef8677a9b9b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_shared/components/file_icon/file_icon_map.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":590}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":6052800,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `gl_dropdown.js` has 935 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"144655d5e2aa528a6e4d63861c3bc2f1","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":1111}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":11064000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `GitLabDropdownInput` has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4679297a043d89d437946bd083443d13","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":58}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":984000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `GitLabDropdownFilter` has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0c2b6bfd5d744ae2f9724aae0a60a765","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":136}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1320000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `filter` has 53 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3be214723bb15219db661db421dccba1","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":142,"end":213}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1272000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `GitLabDropdown` has 172 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"45e3d28c25ef43db19fcd1f8bf7a52dc","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":296,"end":481}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":4128000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `parseData` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5a6929b08a7efc020e932267316a1ce4","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":505,"end":538}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `opened` has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b32257d5ff71fd022c46be4ff3f196b6","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":580,"end":627}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":864000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `renderItem` has 77 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"119c9b263aba3cc2173646b63b83d58d","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":698,"end":793}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1848000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `rowClicked` has 75 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e37288d65d5701c4b7d06560d3eb6910","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":820,"end":904}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1800000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `addArrowKeyEvent` has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4ccf81453af86fd4e7f521423adbf28e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":971,"end":1015}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":936000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `highlightRowAtIndex` has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a0b5b8a75d9f5726f8a559a3068bbfd9","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":1026,"end":1073}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":864000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"nested_control_flow","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":174,"end":184}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"603368a717652923897a9efd4f494784"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `onOptionClick` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a1ead8da9cc948075715df57538a53fb","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/groups_filterable_list.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":122}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `onOptionClick` has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"aa9f5f9cb36f5307a7db44c29b5f3a4c","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/groups_filterable_list.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":122}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":768000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `setSearchedGroups` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4116f1bf48693b8dbc3a19233c167489","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/store/groups_store.js","lines":{"begin":19,"end":33}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `formatGroupItem` has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"97209b6e238a05d220f90d1e1fcf7c78","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/store/groups_store.js","lines":{"begin":63,"end":96}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":744000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `getGroups` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4f9fc97d0941125a5eb91818b85ac955","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/service/groups_service.js","lines":{"begin":9,"end":34}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1cc8f54fcedff8d025db690e89c4d3bc","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/clusters/clusters_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":24,"end":78}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1128000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d34e04056341d2986626e42b9927e829","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/clusters/stores/clusters_store.js","lines":{"begin":5,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1080000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `initLayoutNav` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"858063cf6c5a28edd5390360940941f1","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/layout_nav.js","lines":{"begin":12,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `sidebarToggleClicked` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e95063093263d654532b1bda2499ae09","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/right_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":69}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `toggleSidebar` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b4667aa48f617e84611c658bd9e6fd42","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/right_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":201,"end":218}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `message` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f561803cb2a47ffaeed70a1f967105da","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/error.js","lines":{"begin":9,"end":21}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `issueTemplate` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"36dc94ada0224320b48f9dcddf971dd3","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":223,"end":223}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"`Api` has 24 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"62c9c1d73c6c2f6f294b2c13a5c92e49","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":5,"end":282}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1600000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `validate` has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8b07c343f7afe957592fac79043c9586","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/new_branch_form.js","lines":{"begin":53,"end":94}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":936000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `labels_select.js` has 444 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"34830d2a928eacedb749d5c66c3637e9","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":517}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3993600,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `setDropdownData` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"99aee27c164d2c53ee3386f64239ebc9","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":466,"end":507}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 369 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ca542a5aefb3dbadb5e0a0100a94b863","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":16,"end":429}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":8856000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `data` has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"00d06b2fdc398a9031e900f76184076f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":133,"end":176}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":984000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `renderRow` has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ef4d877e54496d7ad4da0e0a0b96d9aa","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":177,"end":235}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1200000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `toggleLabel` has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"35ba5b5dab8a50aa713a5ba60e1db7a1","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":242,"end":278}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":744000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `hidden` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2dc1a005647c9e7e9f81e0eabeb9563d","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":294,"end":324}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `clicked` has 75 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f7fb23f1a88e5dc4c8430529946de3dc","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":327,"end":414}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1800000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `setDropdownData` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"955ed39a38f4f36c3ae0d23199b6b90d","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":466,"end":507}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"nested_control_flow","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":407,"end":412}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"cefdca8d12fc08aff6e7a861750e99d9"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":377,"end":377}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"1d311ac9ae722bf786749b2125e5cf47"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":411,"end":411}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"7d42a3bbce082d2bbdc96d5eaa747454"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `storeEnvironments` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"70cce4c4dfcfa9c7fb820fc6dea68e9c","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/environments/stores/environments_store.js","lines":{"begin":36,"end":71}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `storeEnvironments` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f5b13b9d301832978862f37bcc22708f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/environments/stores/environments_store.js","lines":{"begin":36,"end":71}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `created` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"139fddb1aa522eb2c141871eab765fc3","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/environments/mixins/environments_mixin.js","lines":{"begin":142,"end":175}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b4d0a598693b87337ee6b071a35c6da2","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issuable_context.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":888000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `dropzoneInput` has 210 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"96984c8a7930ad755604f49c3edf6a2b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/dropzone_input.js","lines":{"begin":23,"end":290}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":5040000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1ec26d8ddc2c55de770d1f8038f590f4","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/zen_mode.js","lines":{"begin":39,"end":67}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `types.ADD_NEW_NOTE` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"026945d2d3de0e3f478ec55a7bb820f5","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `types.REMOVE_PLACEHOLDER_NOTES` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"26efdceb93879d8478e3c8a4f549bc22","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":66,"end":85}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"`` has 22 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"75cd5c2d207814d4a7c7fbf69c709fd6","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":224}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1400000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `actions.js` has 271 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9e2580af22da5d9875ac924fda6d0551","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/actions.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":337}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1502400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `saveNote` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9dbdac686defafb20b3397ccb7105ba3","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/actions.js","lines":{"begin":151,"end":226}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `getQuickActionText` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3019b0611c6febc7b696f0615d561d1b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/utils.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":26}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `collapseSystemNotes` has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"757d82e7c89224872a7bd7b269ed55c5","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/collapse_utils.js","lines":{"begin":57,"end":105}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":792000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `unresolvedDiscussionsIdsByDiff` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"250bf3d3615586b7cdaecad2c187e0a0","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/getters.js","lines":{"begin":117,"end":139}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `jumpToDiscussion` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ebbd3b5d75f27f2372eb1a56ca4d9206","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/mixins/discussion_navigation.js","lines":{"begin":5,"end":27}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `keydown` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1977a74c9fba9606480c93a63cb0d5c0","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/plugins/filter.js","lines":{"begin":4,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `keydown` has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6356352d7ef34cfddc4738ed0c5ebdbf","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/plugins/filter.js","lines":{"begin":4,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":792000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `trigger` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3ad4384530fc0032f4fafe9d12e7dc70","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/plugins/ajax_filter.js","lines":{"begin":35,"end":71}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `_loadData` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"357b7070736cef3f382a2c3439a40d89","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/plugins/ajax_filter.js","lines":{"begin":73,"end":92}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `trigger` has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bc97a87fa8ec1b132731256b23616434","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/plugins/ajax_filter.js","lines":{"begin":35,"end":71}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":840000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `Keyboard` has a Cognitive Complexity of 49 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6b1d8f0930c09b5318307d0788ffca30","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/keyboard.js","lines":{"begin":5,"end":111}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":4550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `Keyboard` has 96 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a812687f4ed1c53045b473f0d6aa5cb9","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/keyboard.js","lines":{"begin":5,"end":111}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2304000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `keydown` has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e7cbff360ff21f798bf424a899291302","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/keyboard.js","lines":{"begin":70,"end":107}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":840000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `highlightHash` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2bd33253a3ff30d380e94d478d49a6e7","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/line_highlighter.js","lines":{"begin":59,"end":82}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `highlightRange` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4258948c78c182b6db020222636c12bb","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/line_highlighter.js","lines":{"begin":144,"end":157}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `checkElementsInView` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"08e5457bd1bcf2aa36f67185fb5ab932","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lazy_loader.js","lines":{"begin":53,"end":75}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `loadImage` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1e063810e532be97a06efabd3c56e4db","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lazy_loader.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":94}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `constructor` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a3ef386977d1577238533b8b5352a499","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":43}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `handleClickUnfold` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f82a7cc93be5e64d548469363a77a2fb","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff.js","lines":{"begin":45,"end":79}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `initMergeConflicts` has 81 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dd259a46f5e703e8f722acdac619ad79","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflicts_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":12,"end":100}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1944000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `merge_conflict_store.js` has 357 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"131a2e61cbfe7efc49cced2ffab3568b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":436}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2740800,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `setParallelLine` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f005034ab86d552698a2211ae91ae99a","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":101,"end":139}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `isReadyToCommit` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"184e70a4c8de2226d5a4b197c147f2e8","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":315,"end":351}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"nested_control_flow","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":331,"end":333}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"78a238497c0c8acd6ddefbb67176f033"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `init` has 216 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0c8af9cd2b45c1c2e6e24c4678a9c6fc","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/milestone_select.js","lines":{"begin":23,"end":253}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":5184000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `clicked` has 91 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c5e3838b8db3f11da2f72d9acaf52a17","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/milestone_select.js","lines":{"begin":150,"end":250}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2184000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/milestone_select.js","lines":{"begin":187,"end":187}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"9265cc21e5d1eb1bebd044e85db1bf79"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/milestone_select.js","lines":{"begin":220,"end":248}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"36ba0880a027f4448128be161cf33b26"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `createFlash` has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d8f8d96fc8578fb3f7f7bf875e0668a0","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/flash.js","lines":{"begin":64,"end":69}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `textBuilder` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"877ac84192b385c963c08bb4ef960d3b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/reports/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":10,"end":37}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e2f702de12038884b25d0ef63861bd2b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ref_select_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":4,"end":46}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":864000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `setConfig` has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"33b2d4c912bf8eb7a3c4b9c2d3302729","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/close_reopen_report_toggle.js","lines":{"begin":57,"end":94}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":840000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `notes.js` has 1338 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"515dff155804bebfe20a78b3935600eb","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":1859}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":16867200,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `keydownNoteText` has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4a28bd8f572a9cb26ff49edf77e2d3a3","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":226,"end":278}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `renderNote` has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bc0dc1a78ad18f837b6cead5d11a5ac2","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":403,"end":462}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `renderDiscussionNote` has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dbb0fd84250020e115dbb0554f3dfc2a","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":471,"end":538}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `toggleDiffNote` has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ddb3cba4008791217e07933b09a14951","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1054,"end":1124}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `updateTargetButtons` has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4ea9fe607edc9cf98ef50a17584952c2","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1196,"end":1241}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `postComment` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cc8dd67d9f1598e83dc132f50b7f0726","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1604,"end":1796}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"`Notes` has 74 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5363864915c583936ec6c63c5ed96689","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":48,"end":1856}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":6600000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 54 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"25812d53d4eb0f340c33a5a5ddca467a","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":59,"end":121}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1296000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `addBinding` has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9b40ee2b94454885b3fd51a8bc139c1c","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":127,"end":180}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":792000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `keydownNoteText` has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"85df701d158d32b25dca1c2039b6a3be","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":226,"end":278}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1152000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `renderNote` has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8dfb4b9b4d144d82422186651b46b3e4","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":403,"end":462}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1200000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `renderDiscussionNote` has 53 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"52b66ad02e73c9b1c8848bd1affad7fc","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":471,"end":538}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1272000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `removeNote` has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8c1e3976ef9bdf79365857e0b8bcb5d8","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":848,"end":911}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1080000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `setupDiscussionNoteForm` has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d1b7947a88bd1e4b3519e282320fbb38","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":956,"end":1009}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":840000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `toggleDiffNote` has 61 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"60ae737d4dc10fe0af6e670d2d4bc7e2","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1054,"end":1124}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1464000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `updateTargetButtons` has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8ccd0067a20bb8afcaf3317b434b1ece","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1196,"end":1241}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1032000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `createPlaceholderNote` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ddcd3bc4735c7d763b0fe5da55217278","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1526,"end":1566}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `postComment` has 143 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fcdd1766ceaaa90c770bddfe75d120cd","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1604,"end":1796}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3432000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `updateComment` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7c508bf1571f9f4d795de4cb8ef1930a","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1811,"end":1855}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":264,"end":264}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"cd548cc7c1ebbb2263b1d2ecdb94a5dd"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":272,"end":272}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"cd548cc7c1ebbb2263b1d2ecdb94a5dd"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":275,"end":275}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"25fb735695be215146eaf2300412aae0"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `itemClicked` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"86a06125a02d35c7e121952daf7f0f08","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_hint.js","lines":{"begin":23,"end":60}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `itemClicked` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e7751795d821a7afa57ab25dbd658ee4","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_hint.js","lines":{"begin":23,"end":60}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `filterHint` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"22102abbd93e4d53a0798ecf7e058512","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_utils.js","lines":{"begin":117,"end":140}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `getSearchQuery` has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"26e123d9f4a95bfa34a59f42db0ae260","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_utils.js","lines":{"begin":164,"end":213}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":960000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `processTokens` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"28cb3a1b7fa1a51cd968e9016415efea","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_tokenizer.js","lines":{"begin":4,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `processTokens` has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"287e8c4963cc8869358280d31e4d4005","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_tokenizer.js","lines":{"begin":4,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":864000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `loadDropdown` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"31af8cc264fa78512d238c04106208fe","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_dropdown_manager.js","lines":{"begin":202,"end":219}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `setDropdown` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6dda613591636a58b06a298d0980498f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_dropdown_manager.js","lines":{"begin":221,"end":243}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `setupMapping` has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f12b787fff78b0b8986506eb90b1997c","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_dropdown_manager.js","lines":{"begin":50,"end":108}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1320000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `load` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"90c65f9cea258055f67defcb61f63abb","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_dropdown_manager.js","lines":{"begin":165,"end":200}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `filtered_search_manager.js` has 514 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"45105bf38088a343a5a9c0e1ca76840e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":645}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":5001600,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `setup` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8c08d2326cb1eb811c4329b3ee92fc04","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":58,"end":106}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `checkForEnter` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2056e10cb965de92a331a6181618ff7f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":236,"end":265}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `handleInputVisualToken` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3ef6573dc182d159eb13ddd70be42653","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":398,"end":438}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"`FilteredSearchManager` has 32 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dee04c9127382346c9edead8ceb49788","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":20,"end":644}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2400000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `setup` has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fc525f4373639fe1e5e079259d587918","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":58,"end":106}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":912000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `bindEvents` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0036874f7fdfa7b481bccec4adce2fd9","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":145,"end":182}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `handleInputVisualToken` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"105fd464c05f365ea496107488c4d048","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":398,"end":438}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `loadSearchParamsFromURL` has 63 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dc0a70cc2480e01d46d52df00f42980b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":463,"end":543}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1512000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `search` has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8d31d46c10a7c7b27cba3e79c2c7e684","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":558,"end":607}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":864000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"nested_control_flow","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":524,"end":529}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"b4fcaa9a90b83251c167ce6bd363ead0"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"nested_control_flow","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":530,"end":533}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"b9acc2eaf5ae1dd8b6f24ac70e97ace6"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `users_select.js` has 594 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9e6ca5bcc402f0dae9a9869dd46e4e77","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":701}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":6153600,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `UsersSelect` has 524 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b4438d98e020e34865089e812790a72e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":628}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":12576000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `processData` has 88 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9e7c9e224218cce1f434b0a0ff4616c4","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":221,"end":327}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2112000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `clicked` has 64 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"19cb3539002fa7a4aa2abf730fc550bc","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":381,"end":468}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1536000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `renderRow` has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b67cb57917ef04a8b05e4be075bf6c0b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":493,"end":531}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":744000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `query` has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"447defa81cda25e0ae3f708d8cb7f927","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":553,"end":604}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1152000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `toggleCollapsed` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"01ddc746dbdfa4103552d4d09bda67bd","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/image_diff/helpers/dom_helper.js","lines":{"begin":27,"end":45}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `addBadge` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5cb8fbd4ee1e42eb778a29cd02efc8f5","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/image_diff/image_diff.js","lines":{"begin":84,"end":116}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1579b1a9e97ea98e6348df70287ccd85","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/job.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":70}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1080000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `getBuildTrace` has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0990625843278c1e0d27866b6e51ec9b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/job.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":163}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1320000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `setVisibilityOptions` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bd793c0b96469cb6904241d8beea60c0","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/project_visibility.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":35}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `restore` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ebd9e5c02ce67b5fecb0e9a610fa01a3","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/autosave.js","lines":{"begin":19,"end":37}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `populateActiveMetrics` has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0808d7392776f800f01eb00247cb49fc","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/prometheus_metrics/prometheus_metrics.js","lines":{"begin":63,"end":100}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":792000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `loadActiveMetrics` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d2f56d70d330df4e004e4e730ec9bd7d","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/prometheus_metrics/prometheus_metrics.js","lines":{"begin":102,"end":130}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `adminInit` has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cb6b998e81923ba316eb986d14f16ef7","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/admin/admin.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":60}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":888000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `renderState` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d23e829e807e7cfa7fa60a5bd8bd2a4f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/sessions/new/username_validator.js","lines":{"begin":49,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/sessions/new/username_validator.js","lines":{"begin":70,"end":70}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"59ee4d34d9113510c329a2b264aae308"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `showTab` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2db6bb70760f9a2493d374e830395ef3","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/sessions/new/signin_tabs_memoizer.js","lines":{"begin":34,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 52 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"364739acddb57495be3b94860555f2ae","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/project.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1248000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `initRefSwitcher` has 63 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e62a2b92cc28ef2e2c5cc5e391c1b3c1","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/project.js","lines":{"begin":83,"end":155}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1512000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `initLabelIndex` has 72 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d6cbf4de48d122212aa6790bce385c52","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/labels/index/index.js","lines":{"begin":9,"end":91}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1728000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `stat_graph_contributors_graph.js` has 260 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d70980224b971643c65164d7599d8306","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":315}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1344000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `ContributorsGraph` has 68 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c5ffd1e9b7f7eb20d76540029db76ea5","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":19,"end":107}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1632000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `ContributorsMasterGraph` has 98 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c90cea5a64860bd8ebc11adfe43f966f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":109,"end":225}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2352000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `ContributorsAuthorGraph` has 75 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cb2ba67ac3c7b0319408d414f7ab4a89","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":227,"end":314}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1800000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `parse_log` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"54a68f13ca92482f197897caa4dde8c6","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_util.js","lines":{"begin":5,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `renderSidebar` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7a8652d503fb546ee9566f5bf3f473ac","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/wikis/wikis.js","lines":{"begin":54,"end":66}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `activity_calendar.js` has 257 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c8cf6370baf6d39528465c33a636bdaa","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/users/activity_calendar.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":300}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1300800,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `constructor` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"12e8c60549aefe50a5602474054d85e9","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/users/activity_calendar.js","lines":{"begin":46,"end":115}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 49 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"70826affaa552c98140c396bd20b2321","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/users/activity_calendar.js","lines":{"begin":46,"end":115}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1176000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `renderDays` has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b25511a5a67d72f5494bf518b57f8945","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/users/activity_calendar.js","lines":{"begin":144,"end":182}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":888000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `renderKey` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f239dc6410f68cc561519c650b54fe79","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/users/activity_calendar.js","lines":{"begin":226,"end":257}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 65 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"910e3f36c66a265e42a8eaf26a167c4b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/search/show/search.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":77}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1560000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `showPreview` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1721f777313e23b7b202fa7491480968","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/preview_markdown.js","lines":{"begin":29,"end":64}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `copy_as_gfm.js` has 400 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ac03b65c923edc62a2698fa8d47bed20","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":510}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3360000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `transformCodeSelection` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c2c7d04215c2bd2989380d4ec16d2fdd","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":392,"end":428}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `nodeToGFM` has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"203624a0d90ac2910cd61598bd1ba9c4","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":430,"end":473}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"`gfmRules` has 23 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4cef7679aa1f25cb0fb0333b4dfea466","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":169,"end":306}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1500000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `transformCodeSelection` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cc79eaa8e95f40163769d11480f6ca8c","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":392,"end":428}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `nodeToGFM` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"abacf74acfb9ae1429676cb952d5250f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":430,"end":473}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":472,"end":472}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"4dc32f63393b2dba3bb2b4186a5a9d3c"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `initPageShortcuts` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7e91b97abbe33722ed743c916435f0ab","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/shortcuts.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":35}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3992dd4b39964f74489f5037465f0968","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/shortcuts/shortcuts.js","lines":{"begin":18,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `updateTopState` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4115079d252dabe584b1839baffa5696","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issue.js","lines":{"begin":46,"end":74}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `bindEvents` has 99 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d911289330106e823f8b66a27a6de9a8","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects/project_new.js","lines":{"begin":38,"end":154}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2376000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `chooseTemplate` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"38d61f9d4b3748a9e5ab863d54f4ccf8","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects/project_new.js","lines":{"begin":98,"end":130}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `search_autocomplete.js` has 417 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"92cc9af55c3a4ab73da8e1f0d3edd029","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":506}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3604800,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `getData` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fc8158cb371adf854571129bd363b7ef","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":149,"end":251}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `getCategoryContents` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d8c7fe125446a794240cdecc04543593","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":253,"end":305}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `onSearchInputKeyUp` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4f647cc28b710d6de8a6b35f3f79f3ce","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":348,"end":382}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `onClick` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b118715fdcf7b3e7ac25f69bb1baa423","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":445,"end":458}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"`SearchAutocomplete` has 28 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4afabdab2d1c2b911d6a1c563638e8e6","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":71,"end":501}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2000000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `setSearchOptions` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ba3145218ad79282dc1d42a52ae16802","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":32,"end":69}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"27f6673ed668afd5ac9f3fd3c02a5e40","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":72,"end":103}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `getData` has 86 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a21aceb13c361e2e3e0299baa560bed5","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":149,"end":251}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2064000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `getCategoryContents` has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"415e6e1a246f7b01199ed828bdebb278","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":253,"end":305}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1080000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `onSearchInputKeyUp` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"438f5589be7d3c9865113320e8a85fc4","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":348,"end":382}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `highlighter` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"034f805c8a510c0c46e35c2e4fb8d329","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/project_find_file.js","lines":{"begin":10,"end":32}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `selectRow` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b2917d9725004429f0a4319beac0822e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/project_find_file.js","lines":{"begin":123,"end":143}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `constructor` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1b590709d469cb1c8c28f467e53d2154","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/namespace_select.js","lines":{"begin":8,"end":58}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"af0c07eddd69b8e22c3e13c7474122a1","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/namespace_select.js","lines":{"begin":8,"end":58}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1152000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `toggleDiff` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"098b6e689349244e7adddfcad90974a3","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/single_file_diff.js","lines":{"begin":41,"end":62}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `onSaveClicked` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"18922f177ff6315e508e19e5d7a6cd4d","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ci_variable_list/ajax_variable_list.js","lines":{"begin":53,"end":90}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cf8b6d0bf24fc15e2c0e87e1c6b6a636","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ci_variable_list/ci_variable_list.js","lines":{"begin":19,"end":62}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `jumpToNextUnresolvedDiscussion` has a Cognitive Complexity of 54 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"792eaacd2770c50c0a42bce535c7bee9","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff_notes/components/jump_to_discussion.js","lines":{"begin":61,"end":208}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":5050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `jumpToNextUnresolvedDiscussion` has 102 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"784d361fd1ec4da2fc3be0e85d1e354e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff_notes/components/jump_to_discussion.js","lines":{"begin":61,"end":208}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2448000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `buttonText` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5b0d7c1b1146fa7930c3c14fef72db27","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff_notes/components/comment_resolve_btn.js","lines":{"begin":31,"end":45}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `diffNotesCompileComponents` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ec443ad0f520ec34248990713c0f0b5a","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff_notes/diff_notes_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":30,"end":68}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `queryTimeSeries` has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"01a425e5bd2ad64d006f35854f477ad0","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/monitoring/utils/multiple_time_series.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":33}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":525000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `queryTimeSeries` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f1015e96e281a9a77bdaeeba619aa36b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/monitoring/utils/multiple_time_series.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":165}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `queryTimeSeries` has 110 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c99f8cbe0230e2f1d48ff4478f2117c4","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/monitoring/utils/multiple_time_series.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":165}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2640000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `timeScaleFormat` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f52e997312984f599f152d3260bf8654","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/monitoring/utils/date_time_formatters.js","lines":{"begin":22,"end":42}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"complex_logic","content":{"body":""},"description":"Consider simplifying this complex logical expression.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":95,"end":134}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":800000,"severity":"critical","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"531fa4647bfb14d1172613e86257dd28"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `types.SET_LINE_DISCUSSIONS_FOR_FILE` has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f6d1e6ad89a6aec9b87ec051dfa0099d","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":88,"end":135}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `types.REMOVE_LINE_DISCUSSIONS_FOR_FILE` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"967d987657c3659898f377b3d07be15b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":137,"end":165}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `types.SET_LINE_DISCUSSIONS_FOR_FILE` has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"08263cf95339fef038c9b82b56e70844","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":88,"end":135}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1032000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `startRenderDiffsQueue` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9d28a6db58513b7ea1157b081952903c","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":58,"end":83}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `addLineReferences` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"782481c579d96128e5d0793c04d6113b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":110,"end":145}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `prepareDiffData` has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"69f60a55e02467d84573c99a4caa96e1","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":191,"end":224}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `getNoteFormData` has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2408381b663271af2ce36e4cfec0ef64","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":28,"end":77}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1080000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `addLineReferences` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9e04f00e197ce4b77a3fa65c55e66cb1","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":110,"end":145}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `prepareDiffData` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4fa4b2e2a939b7a261a1e47aea3b124e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":191,"end":224}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `shouldRenderParallelCommentRow` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cf200732380b3f0a2a2993c8cb3d3a71","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/getters.js","lines":{"begin":75,"end":97}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `initDiffsApp` has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"37689c9906180d81c8f636a1285361fa","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/index.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":41}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":792000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `create_merge_request_dropdown.js` has 391 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"efe0e6e60956f829c50aea15ff89a81c","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":489}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3230400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `onChangeInput` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"51e3d7e3f8979e2acacf219907cfae33","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":278,"end":322}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `updateInputState` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"15a5141561c69faaf772cc24838b9882","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":433,"end":472}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"`CreateMergeRequestDropdown` has 32 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6d33b610bd5704267ec05a9b7b5e44e0","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":15,"end":488}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2400000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9408c08016dc994d8ab6445d06b9e1ba","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":16,"end":61}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":912000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `onChangeInput` has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e5627e01c10e2d6e1299f91b38024a0a","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":278,"end":322}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":792000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `updateInputState` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5126386129e905b8737efa7b7aadb02e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":433,"end":472}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":321,"end":321}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"8643526d248036a3735dc9a6e2e57920"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `addToImport` has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f5c4a1a17a8903f8c6dd885142d0e5a7","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/importer_status.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":92}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1152000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `autoUpdate` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"86f5ee9b3a803d7476f4c94f06eeb20f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/importer_status.js","lines":{"begin":94,"end":123}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `deviseState` has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cc96fa07083c1de787a6bff9f39300d8","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":34}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `deviseState` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b9fdc968681b9a4d1a00bdaebcf5513e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":34}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":13}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"7e01335e6a48fbcffe9b977a5893e0c1"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":15,"end":15}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"06b18956af744e4ba0818ef408ae519a"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":17,"end":17}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"b6db36d200c40a47864a6c82d74ecdd9"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":19,"end":19}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"94cbbf89dae775243077f30c7139777f"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":21,"end":21}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"407c4389388a40459b3a50e566ec4695"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":23,"end":23}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"c9317c489fdab4a76a50dbc5cebcfa17"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":25,"end":25}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"d69b63a794f4784245d6a949c148e1c8"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":27,"end":27}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"766dbcf000fa7d4e2636539267ea8cee"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":29,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"9c3dd1c5c99c0b2e367eaf0f6c483688"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":31,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"9735ac3532df3e31eea793eb471bcd3e"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":33}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"6a3a4a85c8ee79ec2d8e4ea2cf165674"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `setData` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c334ad6c327b60fc52e19d4b1a441be0","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/mr_widget_store.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":114}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `setData` has 88 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"590c6f1bfea578d864bdc64a2fa9a1da","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/mr_widget_store.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":114}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2112000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `groupsSelect` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6d30e631abef41c7858e8c2b472ab41b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups_select.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":88}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `groupsSelect` has 74 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ced5ccd57fcd0e841cc27868cc850186","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups_select.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":88}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1776000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `setAjaxGroupsSelect2` has 71 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cb6c68e362058d81fc462714f431d13d","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups_select.js","lines":{"begin":9,"end":87}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1704000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `setConfig` has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"93dedf1db90bd5e014f609731004784e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/comment_type_toggle.js","lines":{"begin":25,"end":60}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":744000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `memberExpirationDate` has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"93c026069e6f3fae025e1bf3bf480e0b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/member_expiration_date.js","lines":{"begin":10,"end":54}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":792000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `merge_request_tabs.js` has 311 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"91dcee71900ea33c229c8f115d145f57","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":477}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2078400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `constructor` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2c515fc51ceabbbd6bcacbadf7b409c8","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":71,"end":122}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `tabShown` has a Cognitive Complexity of 29 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ca9c966746914ecd639f907aed00306a","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":159,"end":223}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5e286159c60ca68824ec344d5dec0145","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":71,"end":122}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1032000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `tabShown` has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5752347dcb1fd9940bd4bc3d21abd442","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":159,"end":223}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1344000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `loadDiff` has 52 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3eedd69a3c93529e5939b19ecf1b3e32","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":331,"end":401}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1248000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `toggleLabelPriority` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"17bb8b4767aa6ee7a9db29cd4297dfd1","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/label_manager.js","lines":{"begin":53,"end":94}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `toggleLabelPriority` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ac24663bc55eac3c9635bccf3a68dc5a","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/label_manager.js","lines":{"begin":53,"end":94}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4cd0496900d30272b32ee2e3adf188ae","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/issue.js","lines":{"begin":11,"end":46}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `addIssue` has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"70f0f8ea0547b7001e920932e4980ddc","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/list.js","lines":{"begin":164,"end":200}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `addIssue` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7f1eced6b6dca9d960756de9b56ac3c4","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/list.js","lines":{"begin":164,"end":200}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `moveIssueInList` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3726eea384e1d9e6d6d8eebb989b0a55","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/stores/boards_store.js","lines":{"begin":152,"end":152}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `moveIssueToList` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cc191b6dd17cde39e7dd162fd47e19c7","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/stores/boards_store.js","lines":{"begin":100,"end":144}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `moveIssueToList` has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0501fa18f105e7c808db7348aee50cb4","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/stores/boards_store.js","lines":{"begin":100,"end":144}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":912000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `newListDropdownInit` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8f897d86e7796b5b3d49f700124b5adb","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/components/new_list_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":26,"end":82}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `newListDropdownInit` has 51 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f73b08dfbb16f388d03764aefc71b663","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/components/new_list_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":26,"end":82}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1224000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `projectSelect` has 74 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8ccd46aac4a6745374730b2c4f0f1a7f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/project_select.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":87}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1776000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `query` has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8facf3a4b06c65c72b401a6ae241812e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/project_select.js","lines":{"begin":27,"end":64}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":864000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `swipe` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cd344682f57e11e94307c0ae71e31b21","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/commit/image_file.js","lines":{"begin":118,"end":153}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `onion-skin` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d98db2ac5d0ba5352c5501d8e616908a","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/commit/image_file.js","lines":{"begin":154,"end":193}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `mergeUrlParams` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9586f62e5526e65ea5dea846d2d34814","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/url_utility.js","lines":{"begin":19,"end":41}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `common_utils.js` has 421 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5b2e1f175792cddc3122cb26f6f2901b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/common_utils.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":647}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3662400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `handleLocationHash` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"73cd83cbd5164515c6be6e51ced09b94","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/common_utils.js","lines":{"begin":79,"end":112}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `urlParamsToObject` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"87d0167946e02e230645b1a8b4416926","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/common_utils.js","lines":{"begin":152,"end":175}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `createOverlayIcon` has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1195653ae898b98df0d276acb1429b55","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/common_utils.js","lines":{"begin":458,"end":505}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":960000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `onload` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d3e5a07a00d95bb2f853dee0c1c50e98","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/common_utils.js","lines":{"begin":462,"end":502}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `isSticky` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b5704d88401ccd1910b07573165064f6","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/sticky.js","lines":{"begin":10,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `insertMarkdownText` has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1ff368be1929703177fe923eb38be8a2","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/text_markdown.js","lines":{"begin":54,"end":54}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `moveCursor` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"78da0046365fa4a2a913735a7884c4fe","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/text_markdown.js","lines":{"begin":34,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `insertMarkdownText` has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9c17d7ff9d0dfd043e0ac8b46e612742","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/text_markdown.js","lines":{"begin":54,"end":111}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `insertMarkdownText` has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f38a0d7dccba49d8195065ab71f8ef39","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/text_markdown.js","lines":{"begin":54,"end":111}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1032000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `toggleScroll` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a1904c8e94b053af5f2371dece57951f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/logoutput_behaviours.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":41}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `getMonthNames` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5630d70a3018ea651454e11d959c7e26","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":16,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `getTimeago` has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"915cddbb51190cedb7c5488e6d3f715a","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":77,"end":122}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1008000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `dateInWords` has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"35c8c58c18a9af9c0ee997ae5d4b8e48","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":201,"end":243}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":864000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `initKeyNav` has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"90bcaab65ebc8665cd94e8e6286ad7d3","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/tree.js","lines":{"begin":28,"end":66}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":888000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `generateUnicodeSupportMap` has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3235c3b88f6c553ff280eac9faec19fa","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/emoji/support/unicode_support_map.js","lines":{"begin":77,"end":141}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1128000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `getUnicodeSupportMap` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d9342f9326c59d8e19277db8a2cb8500","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/emoji/support/unicode_support_map.js","lines":{"begin":143,"end":178}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `glEmojiTag` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"580f88e3583b6c310ded6fbad9390305","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/emoji/index.js","lines":{"begin":69,"end":102}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `initDropdown` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"301e9b71ddb9969243fc57daa227b33b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/lib/sidebar_move_issue.js","lines":{"begin":27,"end":59}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `branch_graph.js` has 307 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8f961e52cddbca0cb2dd3290c7063853","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":352}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2020800,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `buildGraph` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"18ed687a5ecc08e272ec3f5a1e45ba85","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":103,"end":139}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `renderPartialGraph` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"790548e7db64ebbadd07868d6c20245b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":141,"end":171}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `appendLabel` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"918265d9fa262a2ea6ddda4b96f04407","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":211,"end":246}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `drawLines` has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"df364db884043c3c81e753fb9a58ee90","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":286,"end":333}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":936000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `testWrap` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"65093271e08f9838db54de85e17d7c79","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/raphael.js","lines":{"begin":37,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `commitTooltip` has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c2753572072946d03cae221981b2a147","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/raphael.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":35}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":744000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `testWrap` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3ac8fefe6574f998844a591c4dff399c","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/raphael.js","lines":{"begin":37,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `types.TOGGLE_LOADING` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"41230e2a140c3c519f16d17067a948c0","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":24}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `types.RENAME_ENTRY` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"65c7f9e9aa2de7fa4e24860dbded9820","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":214,"end":263}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"`` has 26 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ee3f6d8624f678d9741d386c4252f0fc","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":10,"end":269}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1800000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `types.RENAME_ENTRY` has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"98f116d65b4aa0e565234027efee827f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":214,"end":263}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":960000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `types.SET_FILE_RAW_DATA` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6460bb9792e8eedb0b1e558f229e6ffa","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":53,"end":75}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `types.DISCARD_FILE_CHANGES` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"aa62953384fc873bd8bddabed1341a3a","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":128,"end":154}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `closeFile` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ca626095e258a497e9cf9c1fa4b7537e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":10,"end":40}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `createCommitPayload` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ead12c6a7c7c105251c94c6af2fda7b0","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/utils.js","lines":{"begin":133,"end":145}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `decorateData` has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f8abacda37ac495ce54d8ce69e488724","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/utils.js","lines":{"begin":55,"end":101}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1056000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/utils.js","lines":{"begin":158,"end":158}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"75e7e39f5b8ea0aadff2470a9b44ca68"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `entries` has 67 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1a9caa4d3fce207f88b2afafe14a1df0","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/workers/files_decorator_worker.js","lines":{"begin":11,"end":91}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1608000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `types.RECEIVE_LASTEST_PIPELINE_SUCCESS` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ac7ea082c786419244a234de0970ebc9","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":11,"end":39}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `types.RECEIVE_LASTEST_PIPELINE_SUCCESS` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0883c6639137c6b51cad4b57c0dd1c38","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":11,"end":39}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0d98be7e83cb9dbc1ca8775da0aa7d19","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/lib/common/model.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":43}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":768000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `initIde` has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"34f27cc8f1c849369b0095674a48c531","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/index.js","lines":{"begin":11,"end":44}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":744000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `init` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0c6f3babcfd2a42ae88ffe4cc05028dc","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pager.js","lines":{"begin":10,"end":10}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f19d7f17b74ab07e9651e12680b14b9d","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/profile/gl_crop.js","lines":{"begin":12,"end":40}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `onModalShow` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c0421daee7918d81456c8580b8878457","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/profile/gl_crop.js","lines":{"begin":69,"end":101}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `initMrNotes` has 74 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4dd3a8bed3022600ffaa03ba5cc77fe6","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/mr_notes/index.js","lines":{"begin":10,"end":92}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1776000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"`` has 24 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"815b15d961f84ea742e6dce8eb3f8a4d","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/badges/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":167}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1600000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_each` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cbc52cfd6436c771188ac8f4e355cb9b","location":{"path":"app/validators/branch_filter_validator.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":30}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_each` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a8179f4c2dfe625c27616c834d37a930","location":{"path":"app/validators/js_regex_validator.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":16}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_each` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0d1ca6a4b7e3294fdc110a8e0ea47f92","location":{"path":"app/validators/cluster_name_validator.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":25}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_each` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d62539a99ae9fabba3cd2cc96713cf09","location":{"path":"app/validators/abstract_path_validator.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":35}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `ProjectTeam` has 27 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ce2cc10520ba3b4b7205e61120d67315","location":{"path":"app/models/project_team.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":194}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1900000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `build_kube_client!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e929847f530fa79a8a58054b9aa3fb8e","location":{"path":"app/models/clusters/platforms/kubernetes.rb","lines":{"begin":125,"end":140}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `note.rb` has 325 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5f0768574ccb05a5f08cf2e994799fa2","location":{"path":"app/models/note.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":474}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2280000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `grouped_diff_discussions` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3e55577fec2bb70f0e880e0e8d0f42ec","location":{"path":"app/models/note.rb","lines":{"begin":150,"end":168}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `in_reply_to?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a17100ec3750af84df807aff92514aa5","location":{"path":"app/models/note.rb","lines":{"begin":367,"end":382}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Note` has 56 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5d5c3b8714fe08a2c7df66bc4bfdc538","location":{"path":"app/models/note.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":474}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":4800000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `track_greatest` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ee586dc1932745869e3f752d180242c9","location":{"path":"app/models/internal_id.rb","lines":{"begin":55,"end":55}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `rename_descendants` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"41d2108d52e96b7975591b300d3b2e60","location":{"path":"app/models/route.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"complex_logic","content":{"body":""},"description":"Consider simplifying this complex logical expression.","location":{"path":"app/models/issue.rb","lines":{"begin":306,"end":313}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":400000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"1cd63fdd17237f7c081abfa37690a7fe"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `as_json` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"430a48264a7379f4d248d672bb16fe44","location":{"path":"app/models/issue.rb","lines":{"begin":250,"end":273}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `readable_by?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"05cd07a39aaac900028cc3b49079c531","location":{"path":"app/models/issue.rb","lines":{"begin":301,"end":315}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Issue` has 30 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9619613b02f7bb8841b9e19c688f5251","location":{"path":"app/models/issue.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":326}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2200000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `cached_attr_reader` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2a0b7bc4cebaa36fff63efc3ada11817","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/redis_cacheable.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":20}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `move_dir` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a75dea312f0b07cc41974f687ba6fc64","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/storage/legacy_namespace.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":41}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `expand_hierarchy_for_child` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f5222419d454a07f66c83180e4789d18","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/group_descendant.rb","lines":{"begin":37,"end":70}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `expand_hierarchy_for_child` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5cd85b2e5055a268df55df99d4d5a94e","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/group_descendant.rb","lines":{"begin":37,"end":70}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `avatar_path` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b6177dbe195b50f7a5b10734fbc4a8d2","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/avatarable.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `with_reactive_cache` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a8e8f8a2e9ccd006ae8f61ca9db92d0c","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/reactive_caching.rb","lines":{"begin":69,"end":84}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `exclusively_update_reactive_cache!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2811b2ef3d5196f0b89cec43f1f2b465","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/reactive_caching.rb","lines":{"begin":91,"end":103}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_binary_column_exists!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"23444612f22a67bddc69d4fb3d9ab40a","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/sha_attribute.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":37}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `current` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"37517b27e64777d7506564ebffc2a9fa","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/cacheable_attributes.rb","lines":{"begin":44,"end":57}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `chronic_duration_attr_writer` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8acb577138f44873e03ae5712c65f31d","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/chronic_duration_attribute.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":28}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `truncated_diff_lines` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8bade7fdd3ab51990a34487352c56728","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/discussion_on_diff.rb","lines":{"begin":41,"end":59}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `calculate_reactive_cache` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ff34ec3cc17426f2d12b615f23171aad","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/prometheus_adapter.rb","lines":{"begin":36,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `position_between` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0f9f931c8a1748472719ac1b03432d6c","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/relative_positioning.rb","lines":{"begin":119,"end":139}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `status_sql` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"46850ccc347015917b7f7d5813dfbb20","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/has_status.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":46}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `has_internal_id` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1753643cebf17fe9b88665c4895f0bc6","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/atomic_internal_id.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_by_full_path` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9de369584b4bc5dcd50146b7967ef3b0","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/routable.rb","lines":{"begin":35,"end":60}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `where_full_path_in` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1d7711a695fff8bdfaa49dc578b0132c","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/routable.rb","lines":{"begin":69,"end":91}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `manual_inverse_association` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"53ad262470fd01998ef23cb50fac0495","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/manual_inverse_association.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":17}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `raw_participants` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"014b735c6a47b089e8ef4112c427cdf6","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/participable.rb","lines":{"begin":72,"end":104}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `each_batch` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5ca9b6fe345855869ed62b41036772f6","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/each_batch.rb","lines":{"begin":42,"end":81}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `each_batch` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e56746932db5150f690993cd09ec2c5a","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/each_batch.rb","lines":{"begin":42,"end":81}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `add_authentication_token_field` has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9ffe8c5e6736ff7519d2b0ad210f55dd","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/token_authenticatable.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":60}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `to_hook_data` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"651dd445a68aa882af831870aac09fe6","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/issuable.rb","lines":{"begin":264,"end":290}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `notes_with_associations` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"edf734b8128847bcceb4300c584ab8e9","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/issuable.rb","lines":{"begin":318,"end":334}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `max_member_access_for_resource_ids` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9a3525a1273d674a7a5dd1b4599a6b80","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/bulk_member_access_load.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":40}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `enum_with_nil` has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d195530dc1d564b6a5a2361310657dd7","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/enum_with_nil.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":33}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `labels_str` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bf445c84a1f8ebfebacc811382517d81","location":{"path":"app/models/label_note.rb","lines":{"begin":77,"end":90}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `notifiable?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"76278bc24d3f0c41a172b68e2f632daa","location":{"path":"app/models/notification_recipient.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":46}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `has_access?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4264d898878128898c4e12b32b905f8a","location":{"path":"app/models/notification_recipient.rb","lines":{"begin":88,"end":101}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_notification_setting` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cf0f0817b180212c8e825cbbed40b752","location":{"path":"app/models/notification_recipient.rb","lines":{"begin":144,"end":154}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `closest_non_global_group_notification_settting` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9f65343a59de0315d68462b18f90defe","location":{"path":"app/models/notification_recipient.rb","lines":{"begin":157,"end":169}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this method.","location":{"path":"app/models/notification_recipient.rb","lines":{"begin":43,"end":43}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"d25d7135d797df677ee520a8a97ae9a6"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `find_commits_by_message` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0c28ee46d93aa21d37eeb5b2a26d394f","location":{"path":"app/models/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":161,"end":161}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `repository.rb` has 758 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"849ce5e0e3a20d8ed78311435ce5fce9","location":{"path":"app/models/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":1058}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":8515200,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `keep_around` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8ffb83b66ddf0a719303059ae40ce506","location":{"path":"app/models/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":249,"end":262}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `tree` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"38d273d7d1372c09c7a5c165e170a642","location":{"path":"app/models/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":647,"end":659}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `next_branch` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"53a66b748f45002bcdd585986f4f828f","location":{"path":"app/models/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":684,"end":697}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Repository` has 128 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1ffa67f7557cad6dc009a3331141e757","location":{"path":"app/models/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":1058}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":12000000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `enabled` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"38454ee90e05a227558719509fe5ec29","location":{"path":"app/models/remote_mirror.rb","lines":{"begin":104,"end":111}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `RemoteMirror` has 24 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"24334db25a09b73ccd711bb06c29a822","location":{"path":"app/models/remote_mirror.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":229}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1600000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `initialize` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9c206e4584e2321188004de82f54d910","location":{"path":"app/models/commit_range.rb","lines":{"begin":62,"end":82}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `user.rb` has 1050 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"11e77959335527c9cb28992c10d37866","location":{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":1502}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":12720000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `increment_failed_attempts!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"51accad62fa466380528844722430a98","location":{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":1253,"end":1264}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `ensure_user_rights_and_limits` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c7a575c65331c7b917638baa8941d41c","location":{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":1405,"end":1414}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `signup_domain_valid?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a9b5f7bc9d9c55cfe5d888bed2fb420a","location":{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":1416,"end":1441}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `User` has 178 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f685bcbb6f822884dec234767db1861a","location":{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":1502}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":17000000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `project.rb` has 1664 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"531155f760c7355b54c66683855d1397","location":{"path":"app/models/project.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":2277}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":21561600,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create_or_update_import_data` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"669b48913bc191fe053ef3cf863c7b51","location":{"path":"app/models/project.rb","lines":{"begin":691,"end":706}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `ensure_import_state` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c647270223f46682704c8933072ea030","location":{"path":"app/models/project.rb","lines":{"begin":732,"end":745}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `check_limit` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"238a83e94e0d19d7e5bf774e737f1856","location":{"path":"app/models/project.rb","lines":{"begin":887,"end":899}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_or_initialize_services` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b5c439340a2145fd43e3c155a46b8084","location":{"path":"app/models/project.rb","lines":{"begin":1084,"end":1110}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `check_repository_path_availability` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"84ad9cf46f3288017a0f4b6db6438a6c","location":{"path":"app/models/project.rb","lines":{"begin":1302,"end":1316}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `after_create_default_branch` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2a2d29b10f840adb402e27183b8afb0e","location":{"path":"app/models/project.rb","lines":{"begin":1685,"end":1704}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `container_registry_variables` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"22330faec24429812d37099efaf8566b","location":{"path":"app/models/project.rb","lines":{"begin":1811,"end":1821}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `handle_update_attribute_error` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"103e8043443b236e57b2b71b4071ed2a","location":{"path":"app/models/project.rb","lines":{"begin":2240,"end":2250}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `fetch_branch_allows_collaboration?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0a44b195efa5fdd8f8a133a9382fe540","location":{"path":"app/models/project.rb","lines":{"begin":2252,"end":2276}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Project` has 258 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"64039fbe3749f7d87b4ba7e85868d7fc","location":{"path":"app/models/project.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":2277}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":25000000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `service.rb` has 261 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f45455ad20cdb5129a3bfb9eebb6498b","location":{"path":"app/models/service.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":346}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1358400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Service` has 40 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"96ce9f4a9d59b553ec55116c8a3be7ae","location":{"path":"app/models/service.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":346}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3200000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `available_services_names` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f2ec9d5c5ae446fb75d746688a3a72fe","location":{"path":"app/models/service.rb","lines":{"begin":247,"end":284}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `raw_binary?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0ae3aeb7a760efb26099272499cfbade","location":{"path":"app/models/blob.rb","lines":{"begin":161,"end":175}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Blob` has 27 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a44f4d9e927f1b91399b8e17fb943f6d","location":{"path":"app/models/blob.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":254}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1900000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `event.rb` has 309 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6850b538f65ad91cf5c5ef2e7148924e","location":{"path":"app/models/event.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":410}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2049600,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `visible_to_user?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"29269e08d03641e18bd2ba7cd22a0d3f","location":{"path":"app/models/event.rb","lines":{"begin":151,"end":167}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1150000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `action_name` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f28caae33540f5326e5ce2d58a03d771","location":{"path":"app/models/event.rb","lines":{"begin":265,"end":287}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Event` has 50 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"613c580b618dad28f34b389f766efe2e","location":{"path":"app/models/event.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":410}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":4200000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `different_group` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2ac2c358921313bb5981e964133c5ecf","location":{"path":"app/models/project_group_link.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":49}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `merge_request_version_params` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8d1a8357abf058d725c59df9cca495bf","location":{"path":"app/models/diff_discussion.rb","lines":{"begin":25,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `active?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"772f6211e69bcffb4fbc411c5d7d31c3","location":{"path":"app/models/legacy_diff_note.rb","lines":{"begin":57,"end":75}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this method.","location":{"path":"app/models/legacy_diff_note.rb","lines":{"begin":62,"end":62}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"4e0039e61f3fd67caeb1b978db868447"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `group.rb` has 290 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d9e231fdbc15e514e21e1596b5e2d930","location":{"path":"app/models/group.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":403}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1776000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Group` has 53 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f82613684deaaf389431887bc5a62c74","location":{"path":"app/models/group.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":403}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":4500000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Label` has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9660fb59aa00ace0b608078c78c611a4","location":{"path":"app/models/label.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":244}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1700000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `has_intermediates?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fc033b957f3fcb1bd690b7edb50aa441","location":{"path":"app/models/pages_domain.rb","lines":{"begin":79,"end":98}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `PagesDomain` has 24 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"389a0c10cffbc7cd770d8d67a31e61ba","location":{"path":"app/models/pages_domain.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":201}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1600000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `generate_slug` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0d507615693230a051c9d4ae397fe5d2","location":{"path":"app/models/environment.rb","lines":{"begin":178,"end":203}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Environment` has 27 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4140683d4224f01a7fe2fad0da3d11c6","location":{"path":"app/models/environment.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":243}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1900000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `ProjectWiki` has 29 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a7ff4b093a326a93bf1e0887a36ba898","location":{"path":"app/models/project_wiki.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":203}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2100000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `track` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d55ffd71690c0e606bcb1fa48074affd","location":{"path":"app/models/user_interacted_project.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":41}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `update` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8737f9bae4ea49696d911b5b162784ef","location":{"path":"app/models/wiki_page.rb","lines":{"begin":215,"end":244}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `process_title` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"43c91a5205fef35946442db85ab54267","location":{"path":"app/models/wiki_page.rb","lines":{"begin":283,"end":295}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `WikiPage` has 35 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"35e7d7ce82a5641563ba1029c54645bc","location":{"path":"app/models/wiki_page.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":326}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2700000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `update_position` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fa4f67c27ab14379e44af70d58264c1a","location":{"path":"app/models/diff_note.rb","lines":{"begin":152,"end":173}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `append` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d527adfd814d095e55079d7a898a3fc3","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/build_trace_chunk.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":84}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `pipeline.rb` has 488 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cee8532683fbbb22a3b807c5714c49c7","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/pipeline.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":671}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":4627200,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `ci_yaml_from_repo` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f19177ae4080cc2c9d81a39383b45922","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/pipeline.rb","lines":{"begin":632,"end":639}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Pipeline` has 68 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"af1e8c39d8b166628ae043bce72269a5","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/pipeline.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":670}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":6000000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `build.rb` has 604 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7967fd1fb861d27e33c208d88261cd76","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/build.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":809}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":6297600,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `scoped_variables` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e310e4c57a2e9123f26a1cbcec9809eb","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/build.rb","lines":{"begin":312,"end":327}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `predefined_variables` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"13282d4d569e2daa02632e5249568733","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/build.rb","lines":{"begin":726,"end":745}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `legacy_variables` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"81e2fd25bb2dd91faed640216e965698","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/build.rb","lines":{"begin":747,"end":759}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `persisted_environment_variables` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"67327cbc303019830fbd1d6586dcde3e","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/build.rb","lines":{"begin":761,"end":772}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Build` has 100 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"736c24725c78f957ee4538a1ef73cab0","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/build.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":808}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":9200000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `status` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c700cdde3d0b6292dd18227b3e90cf8d","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":179,"end":187}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Runner` has 31 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a9c3d8a2409fd9c5506a846374c16d42","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":320}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Discussion` has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"21189089f43b68ee94981dbac970d566","location":{"path":"app/models/discussion.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":138}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1500000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `milestone_format_reference` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0e735e47b6b8a533b9ff579e13b277c9","location":{"path":"app/models/milestone.rb","lines":{"begin":261,"end":273}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Milestone` has 26 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"283d777de6e0e7974ccbb1e316f5fd1a","location":{"path":"app/models/milestone.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":288}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1800000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0d0fba50527ad864dc4649245f95f1bf","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/drone_ci_service.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `calculate_reactive_cache` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"aa74471515edc43c1ab5339ddf68e505","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/drone_ci_service.rb","lines":{"begin":53,"end":74}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0a0446e31eb4d865b34fe5938f53bbad","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/chat_notification_service.rb","lines":{"begin":52,"end":79}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `get_message` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"07a9999f0d84368d5983e08e2891f237","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/chat_notification_service.rb","lines":{"begin":111,"end":126}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `notify_for_ref?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6a030ca161112b5f434986ab0ae88c0f","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/chat_notification_service.rb","lines":{"begin":159,"end":171}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `ChatNotificationService` has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5d159cd60a69a3f1a1b5beb530264825","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/chat_notification_service.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":183}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1500000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `read_commit_status` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"69dbb9ff98b20cc8db3a809b7e239e5f","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/mock_ci_service.rb","lines":{"begin":70,"end":84}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `KubernetesService` has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2e6c7a0448e9bb4e799cb7efe0846fc7","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/kubernetes_service.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":251}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1700000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `read_commit_status` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8fb7749a6cc98bccd8d5712c1d499494","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/teamcity_service.rb","lines":{"begin":112,"end":132}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `initialize_properties` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a965dd277aee3504a57790eb7271cadb","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/issue_tracker_service.rb","lines":{"begin":52,"end":69}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `buildkite_endpoint` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"161d47385d79643f9414ed2ad67502a9","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/buildkite_service.rb","lines":{"begin":106,"end":119}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"42914696303830e3d209925e13650d83","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/pushover_service.rb","lines":{"begin":67,"end":104}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `fields` has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"773d8cd6842c7b74f60e9ab8003ad977","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/pushover_service.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":61}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":936000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `execute` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7b760b5c22532a27dbd776328b7db9a6","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/pushover_service.rb","lines":{"begin":67,"end":104}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"802d66c5bd557b6f1bdd32240846e4c2","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/pipelines_email_service.rb","lines":{"begin":28,"end":38}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `jira_service.rb` has 261 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c5f438f6b31722193eb4e10b389655b6","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/jira_service.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":344}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1358400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `close_issue` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f74475ea9bd04b9ed8ff7ddcc5c29633","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/jira_service.rb","lines":{"begin":117,"end":135}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create_cross_reference_note` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6c27b1c9b77bd4f2d2f11a294e90cf36","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/jira_service.rb","lines":{"begin":137,"end":167}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `JiraService` has 35 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2d0643b626f1ad53bf43aadedd954eae","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/jira_service.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":344}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2700000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `read_commit_status` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f2f5469088e256c3b81eccc8ecaf967b","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/bamboo_service.rb","lines":{"begin":94,"end":112}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create_message` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fcb9db20f4fe6adda5925e7da947a943","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/hipchat_service.rb","lines":{"begin":85,"end":100}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create_push_message` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7f972562d25c4198e75c8dac6931a928","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/hipchat_service.rb","lines":{"begin":106,"end":138}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `HipchatService` has 27 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bb12852ed6419e4dea808d1d873302a1","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/hipchat_service.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":311}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1900000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `create_note_message` has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"96500251c9498d9f1e9c7da0c8384528","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/hipchat_service.rb","lines":{"begin":200,"end":244}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":936000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `format_channel` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e064d1923f5ef24f603e3c03af81644f","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/irker_service.rb","lines":{"begin":93,"end":112}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `check_commit` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d6ee148a09cf8c383948472d577bfb74","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/asana_service.rb","lines":{"begin":81,"end":108}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Namespace` has 34 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"411d817f1a6db72f360bb2cb93e055ec","location":{"path":"app/models/namespace.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":302}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2600000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `application_setting.rb` has 387 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"50270695e6d7c5163050078e7cf65e18","location":{"path":"app/models/application_setting.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":489}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3172800,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `ApplicationSetting` has 38 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"02be76880912851331582ab14ef56dd4","location":{"path":"app/models/application_setting.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":489}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3000000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `defaults` has 76 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4a5e7733302a5f59e7878ab40f6b9f82","location":{"path":"app/models/application_setting.rb","lines":{"begin":232,"end":309}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1824000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `base_commit_sha` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"70d6880ba8e52f184e9eaf896119e352","location":{"path":"app/models/compare.rb","lines":{"begin":50,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `commit.rb` has 355 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c361e4106ded93f757f69964f420b067","location":{"path":"app/models/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":508}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2712000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `order_by` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8c4e54c836dbfddf9329a85f83378cb5","location":{"path":"app/models/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":75}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `uri_type` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ac39422eaa05c0e3880afe76c6341f18","location":{"path":"app/models/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":425,"end":435}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Commit` has 68 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e2175bec55ffd09f5d7b2352b5c5dcad","location":{"path":"app/models/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":508}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":6000000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `merge_request.rb` has 897 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"59d143493fc6a1f49dd6ff46bba4459f","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":1238}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":10516800,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_branches` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"95d0d3fa4206c77bab101daf5035ee18","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request.rb","lines":{"begin":511,"end":524}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_fork` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"68cf8c7f9bbbebf2133c22434d2bcae9","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request.rb","lines":{"begin":532,"end":539}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `mergeable_state?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bdc249b8456dc07607ba4fe001ff1261","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request.rb","lines":{"begin":677,"end":685}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `cache_merge_request_closes_issues!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bcd9dc4beba740e5c019b9c760cacdd3","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request.rb","lines":{"begin":769,"end":782}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `compare_test_reports` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b662bb8a5b01a77feb8b7b0a9ffefdb2","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request.rb","lines":{"begin":1041,"end":1054}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `mergeable_with_quick_action?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"74fd9deeffa5589190ba744e4af78384","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request.rb","lines":{"begin":1177,"end":1187}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `MergeRequest` has 137 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"417a10e5eb9495ae2d250b8c195971f7","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":1238}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":12900000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this method.","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request.rb","lines":{"begin":682,"end":682}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"ac1600795e5aff84e3d4e9243b88bdbc"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this method.","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request.rb","lines":{"begin":1184,"end":1184}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"4cc86fde220f02f2e1c1443c9c96fe93"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `member.rb` has 297 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ead9a1c0eaecbe741f755dd85ef04b38","location":{"path":"app/models/member.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":419}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1876800,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `retrieve_member` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9cf98664280114d55fe07fc00a2931f4","location":{"path":"app/models/member.rb","lines":{"begin":236,"end":248}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Member` has 41 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5c62b78b2bb4b49f04e64fa24a5e7525","location":{"path":"app/models/member.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":419}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `set` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8869fa571b5fb7a617adc0197c7ac362","location":{"path":"app/models/active_session.rb","lines":{"begin":20,"end":50}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `count_to_display_commit_in_center` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b411aa7c155fd11004316e7fd39fd0f0","location":{"path":"app/models/network/graph.rb","lines":{"begin":79,"end":107}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `place_chain` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"177c4e2e8eb1351747941148b8c5841f","location":{"path":"app/models/network/graph.rb","lines":{"begin":180,"end":216}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `take_left_leaves` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"07eb1c8a024e1084d5249e442c56ead6","location":{"path":"app/models/network/graph.rb","lines":{"begin":263,"end":277}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `place_chain` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d89c4cb61eca0dac9322942ca4b87aff","location":{"path":"app/models/network/graph.rb","lines":{"begin":180,"end":216}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `save_diffs` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c6b7ee6cba58c9eb3d9ad5eed75d6ec3","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request_diff.rb","lines":{"begin":272,"end":296}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `MergeRequestDiff` has 33 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d7a32bf8ffc7cc2cb0b417114258fc44","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request_diff.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":322}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2500000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `object_storage.rb` has 315 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"86494fa0d557a4aa389e5171896783dc","location":{"path":"app/uploaders/object_storage.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":458}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2136000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `changed_mounts` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fd0a4f3d9448639f581ace634e78fb9f","location":{"path":"app/uploaders/object_storage.rb","lines":{"begin":113,"end":124}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `workhorse_remote_upload_options` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e022c746daf5a42b94b0696cad68db33","location":{"path":"app/uploaders/object_storage.rb","lines":{"begin":191,"end":201}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `unsafe_migrate!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1684da513e48bc7fed9d7d05f006f4f3","location":{"path":"app/uploaders/object_storage.rb","lines":{"begin":415,"end":442}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `record_upload` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7714f01e58a6f57d5612758293fdcd98","location":{"path":"app/uploaders/records_uploads.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":32}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `open` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e3420c6ebb4c5709171dfe0ad626a693","location":{"path":"app/uploaders/gitlab_uploader.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":94}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `FileUploader` has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"377d9736f93da216ab2620478b97b6a7","location":{"path":"app/uploaders/file_uploader.rb","lines":{"begin":11,"end":200}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1700000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `ci_status` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0ecf5e5baa621e39be46cda7a6b7e79a","location":{"path":"app/presenters/merge_request_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":23}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `MergeRequestPresenter` has 29 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8382c7b1054d55cea9b796fc549636ad","location":{"path":"app/presenters/merge_request_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":231}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2100000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `cards` has 79 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"56c716082acebaebac8f5817c4770ff3","location":{"path":"app/presenters/conversational_development_index/metric_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":85}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1896000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `idea_to_production_steps` has 52 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3ec38351e7aae7c1eb1bbf782da34f4f","location":{"path":"app/presenters/conversational_development_index/metric_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":87,"end":140}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1248000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `project_presenter.rb` has 312 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d892daae824d8e78fe2a0b68c288acda","location":{"path":"app/presenters/project_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":370}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2092800,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `default_view` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d66dbcb27efcacaf84388d8cfc5f690f","location":{"path":"app/presenters/project_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":80}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `readme_anchor_data` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c40df23b551a8abe9f2d5830edfbf472","location":{"path":"app/presenters/project_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":221,"end":231}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `autodevops_anchor_data` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3e4902e11edd6de01b81f9a61f5d9d7b","location":{"path":"app/presenters/project_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":275,"end":285}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `kubernetes_cluster_anchor_data` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"119e536f7905363201fb67bbdcd65824","location":{"path":"app/presenters/project_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":287,"end":299}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `ProjectPresenter` has 40 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"174173017516e33835d52eb7c5513209","location":{"path":"app/presenters/project_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":370}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3200000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `notification_service.rb` has 356 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"69e4d6c40c4449fefd31aa10ca6d0d74","location":{"path":"app/services/notification_service.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":550}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2726400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `NotificationService` has 57 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f69a1b203ea4d5900672119cebb81b66","location":{"path":"app/services/notification_service.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":550}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":4900000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"40698d762fba8b2aa8a60c141d6d8790","location":{"path":"app/services/groups/create_service.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `can_create_group?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b75b73bf2d690e5a17c2abe284491440","location":{"path":"app/services/groups/create_service.rb","lines":{"begin":37,"end":54}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `ensure_allowed_transfer` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b1a41885cc0a6ac544248d54c07e1636","location":{"path":"app/services/groups/transfer_service.rb","lines":{"begin":41,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4bb4279e0d059ae00152e8bdf1ea798d","location":{"path":"app/services/groups/update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":25}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `get_operation_id` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e02445fcf7469e25e1790f6de102578e","location":{"path":"app/services/clusters/gcp/provision_service.rb","lines":{"begin":24,"end":48}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ee86b571c5fd71a16cf372ae35959a1d","location":{"path":"app/services/clusters/applications/check_installation_progress_service.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":19}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c7bf557578299a5ba915c32a04c77757","location":{"path":"app/services/gravatar_service.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":18}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `valid_visibility_level_change?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5663649284b422de3ee165079f02580a","location":{"path":"app/services/concerns/update_visibility_level.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":16}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1e2214a2c7403de3b6b130ef6a8ae0e7","location":{"path":"app/services/labels/transfer_service.rb","lines":{"begin":15,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"889d22762e16d3366a67e51333a2ca58","location":{"path":"app/services/labels/promote_service.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":30}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"83f2800751c8e1fc38441feba44838e9","location":{"path":"app/services/notes/create_service.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":53}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `execute` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"64400ce10f6b24c336dc2c14dc7631e5","location":{"path":"app/services/notes/create_service.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":53}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `project` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"55c1155f35f19aeab86111aa747bcdef","location":{"path":"app/services/search_service.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":22}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `group` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9350f7f8937ed59a3c058c18876a72fc","location":{"path":"app/services/search_service.rb","lines":{"begin":26,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `add_commits` has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"eb5157bfd09a812f4b9e9e59faa9bd43","location":{"path":"app/services/system_note_service.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":22}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `change_status` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1b2b9c2adcef9eef8232ca3fabba5213","location":{"path":"app/services/system_note_service.rb","lines":{"begin":214,"end":214}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `change_branch` has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d01b8c3144cf8ecd33ca899268167ba5","location":{"path":"app/services/system_note_service.rb","lines":{"begin":370,"end":370}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `change_branch_presence` has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dcdc7164fbd2b97a6ffca4f6dc2e0e44","location":{"path":"app/services/system_note_service.rb","lines":{"begin":390,"end":390}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `system_note_service.rb` has 269 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9d114264549f2dceede46ea914a3550c","location":{"path":"app/services/system_note_service.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":679}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1473600,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `change_time_spent` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5c81cb9f69e1de7b23d6f18ba82533d3","location":{"path":"app/services/system_note_service.rb","lines":{"begin":181,"end":197}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `cross_reference_disallowed?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cf012be1a6a2e48dd333008fe9d0d152","location":{"path":"app/services/system_note_service.rb","lines":{"begin":455,"end":461}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `existing_commit_summary` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9e510f603309baf5e0cb54ad77970a75","location":{"path":"app/services/system_note_service.rb","lines":{"begin":637,"end":659}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `create_mention_todos` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8a610af9d7608ea64f58ba654367d763","location":{"path":"app/services/todo_service.rb","lines":{"begin":273,"end":273}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `attributes_for_todo` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"22c5b886bc2bcef31fd1446dabf42446","location":{"path":"app/services/todo_service.rb","lines":{"begin":310,"end":310}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `TodoService` has 43 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"888b933ca386de89d1c664deed0728bd","location":{"path":"app/services/todo_service.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":357}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3500000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bcfd0e3ea01c9694d57bfccaa03838e6","location":{"path":"app/services/verify_pages_domain_service.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":28}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d473aafcb22747b52b1f62e820f2074d","location":{"path":"app/services/create_branch_service.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":21}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9a39c0c805730f76077d4c41f5a49ab0","location":{"path":"app/services/todos/destroy/entity_leave_service.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":35}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dd806bba9fb1ffe1bffc98d5b313f431","location":{"path":"app/services/todos/destroy/private_features_service.rb","lines":{"begin":14,"end":25}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"669e705b9b727535b65aa70c23908b8a","location":{"path":"app/services/issuable/bulk_update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fa059d9d5e3d40934b6d454456a29e17","location":{"path":"app/services/issuable/common_system_notes_service.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":21}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `process_registry_access` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0a9f93af474354f18c131c4a6f33ce74","location":{"path":"app/services/auth/container_registry_authentication_service.rb","lines":{"begin":71,"end":77}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `process_repository_access` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d2612abf7127bdfa9f619c175cf5d2cc","location":{"path":"app/services/auth/container_registry_authentication_service.rb","lines":{"begin":79,"end":97}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7189b60fb2402fbb02818934986a95e8","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/overwrite_project_service.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":26}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"961ae326b78bf20ee97acef0cec52327","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/create_service.rb","lines":{"begin":11,"end":74}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `after_create_actions` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e38e4c0872ce60d2ba85c11448b4522b","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/create_service.rb","lines":{"begin":98,"end":114}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `save_project_and_import_data` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"49a616d751623502896fe1bf01ddc263","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/create_service.rb","lines":{"begin":143,"end":158}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `execute` has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"175fda5eebf084d959ea97dbc7ddba89","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/create_service.rb","lines":{"begin":11,"end":74}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":984000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this method.","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/create_service.rb","lines":{"begin":53,"end":53}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"4406c9c51c68a677aea6fc1c46031379"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `propagate_projects_with_template` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"293ec445efe1987a7ed4d749d241b1c9","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/propagate_service_template.rb","lines":{"begin":25,"end":33}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2a2218c0712e897508cb29f687ddbb15","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/destroy_service.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":49}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `attempt_repositories_rollback` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"06f3aaf8a1f066c4e7933483e129d710","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/destroy_service.rb","lines":{"begin":51,"end":63}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `add_repository_to_project` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0129f188de75c26a852812d70994f671","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/import_service.rb","lines":{"begin":33,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_repository` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a7dc266875c644d2161df4f52854509a","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/import_service.rb","lines":{"begin":60,"end":78}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `download_lfs_objects` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e22b343575e9881c97f2271bcd97f948","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/import_service.rb","lines":{"begin":80,"end":99}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_data` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7bc52f032ae36171f9038ca564b8725f","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/import_service.rb","lines":{"begin":101,"end":109}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d3753f60f8dc5d9fdb996971cbdec0ee","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/update_pages_service.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1150000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `extract_zip_archive!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fe7709a469edc64e95ec098c80aa4d9e","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/update_pages_service.rb","lines":{"begin":84,"end":104}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `UpdatePagesService` has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d7d865dc59fc4a03d279c1c19c89a168","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/update_pages_service.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":191}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1500000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `labels_as_hash` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"78f7382b2da989274c44cca4dd67b726","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/autocomplete_service.rb","lines":{"begin":25,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ecc06d47c5ab14de0497085a390276e9","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/update_remote_mirror_service.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f166c36283c89cda2c2d1b400fc83d9c","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/transfer_service.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8619477bd476b8e6c20c420edaafa603","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"eab5a0a1e19f69711efa955efe37831a","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":40,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `after_update` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a1014f2a5df19a7195983026335ef76c","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":54,"end":76}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"23b22fd0746b04d1cdb84c038d084b5b","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/hashed_storage/migrate_repository_service.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":46}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0543ffb09bae340f0c5077ae46b7cdcc","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/lfs_pointers/lfs_download_service.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":23}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"896cabbb6ed77bf3c709bb312f23a6fb","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/lfs_pointers/lfs_import_service.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":32}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `lfsconfig_endpoint_uri` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ab48443c563d169a420e80faa5c91bf8","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/lfs_pointers/lfs_import_service.rb","lines":{"begin":56,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0d7377f3f82a92babb9d1d653fb3a6c0","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/unlink_fork_service.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `notification_recipient_service.rb` has 261 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"04116f97d81f75dc8b45ce0a5811fa81","location":{"path":"app/services/notification_recipient_service.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":384}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1358400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `build!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bc4e88abd84c5b4832ac272b050f5372","location":{"path":"app/services/notification_recipient_service.rb","lines":{"begin":257,"end":295}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Base` has 28 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"27695a9b55119263d5fc023bfb91d6e3","location":{"path":"app/services/notification_recipient_service.rb","lines":{"begin":28,"end":238}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2000000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6cc1d79d478940cb6d6b9ceed02cb6e6","location":{"path":"app/services/users/destroy_service.rb","lines":{"begin":26,"end":64}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute_without_lease` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"67cb8ef6b0457ad00d8347bcbe3ff3f7","location":{"path":"app/services/users/refresh_authorized_projects_service.rb","lines":{"begin":50,"end":71}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `update_authorizations` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6e70e1ba1ea2f084af1fff74047fe8d9","location":{"path":"app/services/users/refresh_authorized_projects_service.rb","lines":{"begin":77,"end":88}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d9165689bde9f912aa84f6f518e598da","location":{"path":"app/services/users/build_service.rb","lines":{"begin":14,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `build_user_params` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"830b5807353157bd5e183aad25f2b282","location":{"path":"app/services/users/build_service.rb","lines":{"begin":88,"end":111}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `admin_create_params` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fe5ddceb25aafe04827303d1f6d564b4","location":{"path":"app/services/users/build_service.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":74}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5bc79f55d7e462657e85385bf64c461b","location":{"path":"app/services/submit_usage_ping_service.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":34}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"eff6af7a39548e896b0c36625e41edfa","location":{"path":"app/services/validate_new_branch_service.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":20}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f26b8395f9bebcbbe601568ab87f1dac","location":{"path":"app/services/tags/create_service.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":32}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"009acc0cc8f2cad1eb48f996869cd8b3","location":{"path":"app/services/tags/destroy_service.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `close_issue` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"268f126190d57eeaaded69cfb25897c3","location":{"path":"app/services/issues/close_service.rb","lines":{"begin":20,"end":39}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `handle_changes` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ff12a5753d6bee667c95cfbc92416e03","location":{"path":"app/services/issues/update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `handle_changes` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8b14e45d1c64f39d6eedb20d84843741","location":{"path":"app/services/issues/update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `filter_assignee` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5691687cb00f6fd194e603429807185a","location":{"path":"app/services/issues/base_service.rb","lines":{"begin":35,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `execute` has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1a9702d3dc815e8d64756d8fb212f9b3","location":{"path":"app/services/web_hook_service.rb","lines":{"begin":24,"end":62}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":768000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `execute` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4d9ca5643eb0d67f71faf5371f5ae764","location":{"path":"app/services/ci/create_pipeline_service.rb","lines":{"begin":15,"end":48}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b8c02fe4ca7afa344ed38920cbc647e3","location":{"path":"app/services/ci/retry_pipeline_service.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":28}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bc2e58626fb38ae2a635ad7504d1369f","location":{"path":"app/services/ci/stop_environments_service.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":18}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"617800a52fa424a1bcea1ed6a62b6793","location":{"path":"app/services/ci/register_job_service.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":66}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `execute` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3c427dfa0dd24ca8d0170b6247260b87","location":{"path":"app/services/ci/register_job_service.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":66}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `process_label_ids` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d322faf3023b3e313c8abe2020cf59af","location":{"path":"app/services/issuable_base_service.rb","lines":{"begin":96,"end":111}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `update` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"139f887d96d46ca70a22e378422f8bc7","location":{"path":"app/services/issuable_base_service.rb","lines":{"begin":172,"end":224}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `IssuableBaseService` has 30 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"906133099e33d0679f4b8c65cc1eef9b","location":{"path":"app/services/issuable_base_service.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":319}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2200000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `update` has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"009042d6d3df2763254c61f2b3d8536c","location":{"path":"app/services/issuable_base_service.rb","lines":{"begin":172,"end":224}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":888000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `build_event_data` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"181f03475858936500cb1903a2981922","location":{"path":"app/services/system_hooks_service.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":70}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `build_event_name` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"58fb30a590bb73d7a7c014c15cff2f61","location":{"path":"app/services/system_hooks_service.rb","lines":{"begin":72,"end":83}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `build_event_data` has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cb1f235466d69ba0f51ae5082e6ccd1b","location":{"path":"app/services/system_hooks_service.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":70}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":984000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `include_any_scope?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c3b269346955ff77f7af249761778c5f","location":{"path":"app/services/access_token_validation_service.rb","lines":{"begin":33,"end":48}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b944cb228f06d17cfab396e042f46404","location":{"path":"app/services/create_deployment_service.rb","lines":{"begin":15,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2a911c4e00c978f2c3dee8a80d2b123c","location":{"path":"app/services/members/destroy_service.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":23}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3e17107f5166483e06d9a3aa43ce4057","location":{"path":"app/services/delete_branch_service.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":23}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `can_be_resolved_in_ui?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"303b72ed1619302f77225ae41471638d","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/conflicts/list_service.rb","lines":{"begin":15,"end":23}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `reload_merge_requests` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a105139484033c8e7ced10c6ce36e8db","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/refresh_service.rb","lines":{"begin":80,"end":106}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_new_commits` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"851ed172a4510d8303c8caf10c7c09e1","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/refresh_service.rb","lines":{"begin":119,"end":141}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `trigger` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8627834675a31ad536bf412edaafd7e7","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/merge_when_pipeline_succeeds_service.rb","lines":{"begin":24,"end":33}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4cd7f00168c6c916f0dc7075f0ca3349","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/merge_service.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":37}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"35e1a81d921bd211a80412b3021d8f1f","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/create_from_issue_service.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_branches` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"629d86725d56fa929caf501972ac7cf2","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/build_service.rb","lines":{"begin":92,"end":97}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `BuildService` has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0955c9bbce7bc1720631a8dc579bbf5f","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/build_service.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":208}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1400000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `get_branches` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7e605b474bb1fb7b66f5bfbaf51d3c6d","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/get_urls_service.rb","lines":{"begin":33,"end":50}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `handle_changes` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cefad5ecb48fbecc8f4fa6ba026659f8","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":27,"end":78}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `handle_changes` has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"db391ef0b97408393fd716be0c7356dd","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":27,"end":78}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1008000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `commit_status_merge_requests` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"784a58094574fa35608fca082c2548e7","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/base_service.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":85}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `interpret_service.rb` has 596 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"83735b0b7c1f8d22c40f49e709c57e70","location":{"path":"app/services/quick_actions/interpret_service.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":700}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":6182400,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b08fd2ee935cfed15e0505bb9af417b4","location":{"path":"app/services/discussions/update_diff_position_service.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":34}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dcb90a6db168562206b2356716e752b6","location":{"path":"app/services/git_push_service.rb","lines":{"begin":24,"end":65}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `index` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8b2781e6841d5d63745094c685fcd1e8","location":{"path":"app/controllers/groups/children_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `index` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3169a6c4ee72f03a1318dedbed6b40ff","location":{"path":"app/controllers/groups/group_members_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":39}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `failure_message` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e3605869f669f4cb85ba66bdd5b04c7a","location":{"path":"app/controllers/omniauth_callbacks_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":38}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `omniauth_flow` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8cf6a8a0fd40eb5ff273cc6dba558403","location":{"path":"app/controllers/omniauth_callbacks_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":77,"end":95}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `sign_in_user_flow` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e780968a46460e3b3fe11a34ddfc0c00","location":{"path":"app/controllers/omniauth_callbacks_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":115,"end":136}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `OmniauthCallbacksController` has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"af6b190bf330da08acbe854817a6812f","location":{"path":"app/controllers/omniauth_callbacks_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":192}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1400000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `impersonate` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f01a1ec9614ccf1b226a3e42206b203b","location":{"path":"app/controllers/admin/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":33,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `update` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"af47e69f6ee053a6f226de336934f214","location":{"path":"app/controllers/admin/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":118,"end":147}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `UsersController` has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bb3ecebd549737d88ffb4ea7b2d02d16","location":{"path":"app/controllers/admin/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":230}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1500000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `show` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4d5e93c6a88076ccc249e69590f05f53","location":{"path":"app/controllers/admin/system_info_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":34,"end":57}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `show` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6c80ea5d1d0a024abdc38fba56cb8435","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/uploads_actions.rb","lines":{"begin":35,"end":48}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `send_blob` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cfa9da0619389a51f42df3b51bf5c65c","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/sends_blob.rb","lines":{"begin":11,"end":25}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `leave` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1f6860cf601d992df6f0af95d95748a0","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/membership_actions.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":82}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `set_issuables_index` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f415a6c750063cabd8f90d48e98e5eb0","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/issuable_collections.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":38}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `authenticate_with_two_factor` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"36f3a297fab9a3ef0e526b7f851741b2","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/authenticates_with_two_factor.rb","lines":{"begin":43,"end":54}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `safe_redirect_path` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"36420be74fc50045ef291eb40a71bb77","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/internal_redirect.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":17}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `safe_redirect_path_for_url` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d5b751dbd9dd362815b574f1cb52225a","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/internal_redirect.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":26}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `note_json` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"273ea02f6c72cced154034c12207d3f1","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/notes_actions.rb","lines":{"begin":104,"end":146}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `diff_discussion_html` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"62bc37c3eb9f037889edcbe39ef53aa6","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/notes_actions.rb","lines":{"begin":148,"end":174}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `note_project` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"573f594e00ed6b29987ce9e763457833","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/notes_actions.rb","lines":{"begin":239,"end":256}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `note_json` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2572ca1fa7eb27c9668322b7a098f02a","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/notes_actions.rb","lines":{"begin":104,"end":146}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `recaptcha_check_with_fallback` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f5ab9c6deb983a187870f912e14afaea","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/spammable_actions.rb","lines":{"begin":29,"end":54}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create_commit` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"832aa36f617c6cce4927e6c8b561ce98","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/creates_commit.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `update_flash_notice` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"89030f5b74776bb2425f95279fdd5b7d","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/creates_commit.rb","lines":{"begin":62,"end":73}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `final_success_path` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"afb1305c0c32730e0b027be235b174a0","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/creates_commit.rb","lines":{"begin":75,"end":83}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `create_commit` has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"eaa2bdf0bf7bb61da1f37f4031392e35","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/creates_commit.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":840000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `send_upload` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cfa021a786ee32f97584fecedce60cde","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/send_file_upload.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":26}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `lfs_check_access!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"46d5167d71a5e6a69a9a236086347aed","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/lfs_request.rb","lines":{"begin":36,"end":45}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"905d81937e68b3931dad7416dc6ef9a6","location":{"path":"app/controllers/import/bitbucket_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":37,"end":65}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"20b781fcddc55e961f42441c445d70d8","location":{"path":"app/controllers/import/github_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":39,"end":58}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `GithubController` has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ab20d51ced6ac78aa49e0f6de0af0ac0","location":{"path":"app/controllers/import/github_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":132}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1400000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_or_create_namespace` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2f80525d40e648a6d7ea2229b2cb74ae","location":{"path":"app/controllers/import/base_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4d4ab07c39a5534d15b7443e37a7a235","location":{"path":"app/controllers/import/bitbucket_server_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":45}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_import_params` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"da2d51f606c44590f847c4640444ac5b","location":{"path":"app/controllers/import/bitbucket_server_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":82,"end":90}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `callback` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3c9e710a6531242212414756cccfe915","location":{"path":"app/controllers/import/google_code_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":33}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `check_captcha` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"de5a9e305854d86a525c3be0d27eaf6d","location":{"path":"app/controllers/sessions_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":62,"end":78}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `auto_sign_in_with_provider` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f619928e9105c1311e52540b45817001","location":{"path":"app/controllers/sessions_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":167,"end":186}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `SessionsController` has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ca547cff8dfcb4f2bb32febd07c3a8b9","location":{"path":"app/controllers/sessions_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":221}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1500000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"44af899cceadececa5fb2d6343c42fb8","location":{"path":"app/controllers/registrations_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `index` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"07120d763a5a37d3563d108da7618fc2","location":{"path":"app/controllers/snippets_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":43}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `show` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"19fe68118b5b1cf2a9c1bfef20064546","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/wikis_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":20,"end":44}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `update` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4754ebccd6eb3ba307dee978dd12dde8","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/wikis_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":65}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `merge_requests_controller.rb` has 265 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ed0fbac1699084d99f2798b9ff54b642","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/merge_requests_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":354}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1416000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `show` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f6d989eecff0a311d8a4126b524b3d54","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/merge_requests_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":76}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `update` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"043aac3b7446fd75e17405d975137865","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/merge_requests_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":123,"end":145}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `ci_environments_status` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"46e544b6af20509fb22aa245f36e853b","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/merge_requests_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":204,"end":242}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `merge!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5c7d0579b3b6ee7f277ab6932678009d","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/merge_requests_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":285,"end":319}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `MergeRequestsController` has 28 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b062a438177acc72625495d3cbfaa77c","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/merge_requests_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":354}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2000000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `show` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e3c966096d2b12e85a670db7911707b8","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/merge_requests_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":76}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `ci_environments_status` has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e5b7f8ffd1531062cbb97dd163687759","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/merge_requests_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":204,"end":242}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":768000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `set_commits` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e6d95cec8ea5cbbfb499acf2d8c47bb9","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/commits_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":55,"end":69}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `archive` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"24b42f263d62dd73163666f08a5dab84","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/repositories_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":28}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create` has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"48f2140ee4baa6d602990f3cd3a4e3bd","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/branches_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":52,"end":91}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `create` has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7b53414d925313d554a03dbde87a17b1","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/branches_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":52,"end":91}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":768000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `authenticate_user` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"aeab90a0370c820e728a3abfbc25b413","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/git_http_client_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":59}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `update` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"59245dcb34ab6bc8f9698502300494c2","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/mirrors_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":15,"end":34}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `resolve` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"43486b045d4b1186318cfc251852d98f","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/notes_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `unresolve` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"687318ee4eb16a33452c1f37b2c881a0","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/notes_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"31c48fb29d257a60073d2b38d6e1cb4d","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/forks_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":39,"end":60}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `index` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a118caadbf010e6edb81311d4382716d","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/pipelines_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":44}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `show` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3abec97b27020fca915a84ac93bc67d6","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/imports_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":39}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4da2f2dd27d4fd213b9f9f2f1a5cd41f","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/group_links_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":22}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `service_test_response` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bca34a40fb26a815c60df6fd1e7dba51","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/services_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":36,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `metrics` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"519adc463f2dd3de5cb94580d7f50383","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/deployments_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":15,"end":26}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `additional_metrics` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8c4f6fc892643a150dc844973ad4d976","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/deployments_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":28,"end":42}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `add_match_line` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"07c854b446b4087e5ee7892172f74ee7","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/blob_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":133,"end":149}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `blob` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b6f7a07f247048d784135038dce26244","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/blob_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":151,"end":165}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `editor_variables` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cfcc7b49429c64315cf6da835ec8bede","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/blob_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":192,"end":221}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `BlobController` has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c1e63be99f08c204815ffecf3dd4b66c","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/blob_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":284}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `show` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"979438a3332d8f5f08717dc86472299b","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/tree_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `show` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"806fa8153a8d1eb022e92afcd4601d91","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/tree_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `raw` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e4f02dd301b3eeb842d85c37f20bae2e","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/jobs_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":126,"end":140}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `JobsController` has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6f969a368940183e4fce1acd28147f56","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/jobs_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":189}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_merge_request_diff_compare` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"91ff93d1ec72c5ce3a260ca7bb0355a1","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/merge_requests/diffs_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":73}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `download_objects!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b7b7331d3cec46b88359e5648ed2f9a2","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/lfs_api_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":52,"end":68}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `ClustersController` has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"964ab09026b9448f413a95a5f6094e09","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/clusters_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":222}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1400000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `move` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ae70ac550f5ace969dc34ad430e1a506","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/issues_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":95,"end":113}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `IssuesController` has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"09358857b8d0a59b5b0f1efabe1eb312","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/issues_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":251}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `ensure_root_container_repository!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a31d8c82827ad31ea06cbe929b5bcb9e","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/registry/repositories_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":39,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `get_keys` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e98b2fc794e033c8a48c3ee0becb6ada","location":{"path":"app/controllers/profiles/keys_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":36,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `show` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7fac5d70e69bf9664ceb8d865c808fa2","location":{"path":"app/controllers/profiles/two_factor_auths_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":40}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `show` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"053f896df50c58d1c5a7f874e0cf72c3","location":{"path":"app/controllers/profiles/two_factor_auths_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":40}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `new` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"17c6af74d7968b2ff43b8ab9795a3e8a","location":{"path":"app/controllers/oauth/authorizations_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":18}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `projects_controller.rb` has 328 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ed6bb55f0c75667bbb0ec51d3c2664cf","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":436}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2323200,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `refs` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4477c3a607082b3d28aae895558786dd","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":241,"end":274}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `render_landing_page` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"278be4b0b74df103253b6e3205fb8a62","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":281,"end":298}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `ProjectsController` has 37 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8090aa2673614a81e71589f7753eff30","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":436}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2900000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `project_params_attributes` has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2fdc2a483f87578ca62a61a751d113d7","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":331,"end":370}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":888000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `render_check_results` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ba1563517e02434643d39267194f528e","location":{"path":"app/controllers/health_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":39,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `show` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f7c994d83ef228aa163c05179f06d2fd","location":{"path":"app/controllers/help_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":57}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `clean_path_info` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5db34152511808356524914b64cf554b","location":{"path":"app/controllers/help_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":82,"end":107}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `application_controller.rb` has 341 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f029769395ddcac92c2b8d2ca3b05b28","location":{"path":"app/controllers/application_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":465}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2510400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `ldap_security_check` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"523cc3bb278c788d5848949c8c3dead7","location":{"path":"app/controllers/application_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":262,"end":272}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `enforce_terms!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d14876e741b595110a644395f1230e14","location":{"path":"app/controllers/application_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":318,"end":339}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `ApplicationController` has 53 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d63945970dce3ed1ef2b7634b214a4e9","location":{"path":"app/controllers/application_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":465}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":4500000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `users_select_tag` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a108342e6dd48ba76731363b84661eaf","location":{"path":"app/helpers/selects_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":26}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `users_select_data_attributes` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a8bad651f6dba343e0468fd0003dd784","location":{"path":"app/helpers/selects_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":85}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `show_last_push_widget?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2f5475afeb1122f3cfa25ac5955cbb27","location":{"path":"app/helpers/application_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":70,"end":86}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `visible_attributes` has 119 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"17f189b8fca7fc3b1f8a420a4bcbda19","location":{"path":"app/helpers/application_settings_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":146,"end":266}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2856000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `toggle_award_url` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d69f1bff0994f6e3441f85f3f11d5bbe","location":{"path":"app/helpers/award_emoji_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":17}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `page_gutter_class` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e65e525a4333beebdf83e031e767ef28","location":{"path":"app/helpers/nav_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":39}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `get_header_links` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f16a544d112fad89ba71d21c6d5db6a3","location":{"path":"app/helpers/nav_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":55,"end":75}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `diff_match_line` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b869dd8c4eaef5740ed1f255a8f1fbf1","location":{"path":"app/helpers/diff_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":37,"end":57}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `parallel_diff_discussions` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8ca093d3db0a23030593eb120a3b43fd","location":{"path":"app/helpers/diff_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":69,"end":85}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `active_nav_link?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a16ad6a8f13c9288d42920124805df7f","location":{"path":"app/helpers/tab_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":75,"end":104}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `user_status` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1c1f76f6143eff8d1d22a334a235fd12","location":{"path":"app/helpers/users_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":55,"end":71}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `namespaces_options` has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7abb679aa0b2ea21e01c24880d3bf77c","location":{"path":"app/helpers/namespaces_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":45}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `options_for_group` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1e8e66fbb82bdafdc25047aa1524869b","location":{"path":"app/helpers/namespaces_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":71,"end":86}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `namespaces_options` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d1da7571d4cd35e4edcc84ea6e21ec17","location":{"path":"app/helpers/namespaces_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":45}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `submodule_links` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"592e98a3099ca8bf38ff5b45bcb0dffb","location":{"path":"app/helpers/submodule_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `submodule_links` has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c06e0c3ec596b1cdfd2de6f634cd6b86","location":{"path":"app/helpers/submodule_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":768000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `remove_member_message` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bba34164517c03c61579ce09b9d98bb9","location":{"path":"app/helpers/members_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":22}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `chunk_snippet` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"de18ceb549965f7ea862a8c0dc960bea","location":{"path":"app/helpers/snippets_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":105}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `labels_filter_path` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9d39f54cf4cda251c101014a6f4c7244","location":{"path":"app/helpers/labels_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":134,"end":149}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `label_status_tooltip` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"64c9182b39df4fa2de87d8d55c2d2cbc","location":{"path":"app/helpers/labels_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":216,"end":222}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `event_feed_title` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0ae609cca64a854e8b692dd72db01e13","location":{"path":"app/helpers/events_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":102}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `event_feed_url` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f99a06ad5d757ef02870ca23d95676bc","location":{"path":"app/helpers/events_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":104,"end":122}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `push_event_feed_url` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0a4c5fb26657f91ff277b7ef0d13c32d","location":{"path":"app/helpers/events_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":124,"end":138}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `discussion_path` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f8fcc6a280f6df449c018435d3f92438","location":{"path":"app/helpers/notes_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":77,"end":92}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `clipboard_button` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c29991b281e121dc435a356a600e4e1e","location":{"path":"app/helpers/button_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":59}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `dropdown_item_with_description` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8d5076e20cc132338854d62653cd1df8","location":{"path":"app/helpers/button_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":88,"end":97}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `clipboard_button` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"97e66a0f68fa32b384f734ea55e5e044","location":{"path":"app/helpers/button_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":59}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `dropdown_tag` has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4267997c227f431d5c46888b32748d75","location":{"path":"app/helpers/dropdowns_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":41}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `dropdown_toggle` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7a5dbb87125de6801bd8e3f421ea8d82","location":{"path":"app/helpers/dropdowns_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":43,"end":50}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `dropdown_tag` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5365287d8861b3ecac3eb84417018a2b","location":{"path":"app/helpers/dropdowns_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":41}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `sprite_icon` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b288e014419e55f1aa86631629c79889","location":{"path":"app/helpers/icons_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":44,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `file_type_icon_class` has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2ddea2c28588a85667f5b5399507ff46","location":{"path":"app/helpers/icons_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":109,"end":151}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":888000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `commit_action_link` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8657821ad7a6c0ec4e6398a6aee36f9c","location":{"path":"app/helpers/commits_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":161,"end":181}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `todo_target_path` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d03a4561eaff01e66db146018ad0c969","location":{"path":"app/helpers/todos_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":39,"end":54}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `todo_due_date` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"db4163fb6bc594c0c7f5188d10a94d61","location":{"path":"app/helpers/todos_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":141,"end":160}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `url_for_issue` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b77357907fc65f32d6adebdec5c99e74","location":{"path":"app/helpers/issues_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":32}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `path_breadcrumbs` has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"309df9fc4689b2f5fb71f6534a5efd03","location":{"path":"app/helpers/tree_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":105,"end":121}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1150000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `edit_fork_button_tag` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2b6c57301b36358581b2491652866c44","location":{"path":"app/helpers/blob_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":302,"end":302}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `edit_button_tag` has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"723d5e25e5499349ff424fa5046927f1","location":{"path":"app/helpers/blob_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":318,"end":318}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `modify_file_button` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4b6850840a5430937e584328e518311d","location":{"path":"app/helpers/blob_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":51,"end":69}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `blob_raw_url` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b8466fa1a816b27c99638fe228016597","location":{"path":"app/helpers/blob_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":119,"end":131}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `edit_button_tag` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"93c71a130633cfcebe91bcda32798413","location":{"path":"app/helpers/blob_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":318,"end":327}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `projects_helper.rb` has 438 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a3d8d9970bc1e29fb6cf0845a8963a35","location":{"path":"app/helpers/projects_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":555}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3907200,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `link_to_member` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"92e14b6f78cd2026911faaf78829ba53","location":{"path":"app/helpers/projects_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":73}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `project_title` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2ebe86c74e8aaea024bada46109f4e9a","location":{"path":"app/helpers/projects_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":75,"end":93}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `get_project_nav_tabs` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8c4c2cc0402179e15ec7cff7acf71f67","location":{"path":"app/helpers/projects_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":266,"end":300}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `disallowed_project_visibility_level_description` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cde9c43b6e33582ebc01be9dcc6b0cc6","location":{"path":"app/helpers/visibility_level_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":84,"end":102}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `disallowed_group_visibility_level_description` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c964b53a81590235d500b10d64921ffc","location":{"path":"app/helpers/visibility_level_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":106,"end":128}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `webpack_controller_bundle_tags` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d1915400e4cdf8101f80cf09fcaa41a8","location":{"path":"app/helpers/webpack_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":34}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `webpack_entrypoint_paths` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2059057b0a4c8c172104d3a69b6d33a1","location":{"path":"app/helpers/webpack_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":36,"end":57}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `webpack_public_host` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5187936b625c537cc83fe49f935245ac","location":{"path":"app/helpers/webpack_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":59,"end":68}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `milestone_class_for_state` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9f98077e679dcc8bdc4adbc9fc03e111","location":{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":71,"end":79}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `milestone_time_for` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7e9f0e967afa3a497b80340cf11b095e","location":{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":122,"end":144}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `milestone_date_range` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4843496f3de8ac4a890951c97d469064","location":{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":181,"end":197}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `share_with_group_lock_help_text` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ff00375205d66e384de0e3f33ec7d0d7","location":{"path":"app/helpers/groups_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":96,"end":108}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `group_title_link` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"98657f045e5336754e6eae56e789418f","location":{"path":"app/helpers/groups_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":141,"end":146}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `ci_icon_for_status` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7c3efeba2a30134025307449a05b2f77","location":{"path":"app/helpers/ci_status_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":61,"end":91}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `sorting_helper.rb` has 302 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"01923968066dde38b1a1f78557e3aa84","location":{"path":"app/helpers/sorting_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":382}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1948800,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `link_to_html` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7a4d4827db929df3ce6e16fb4d0b9522","location":{"path":"app/helpers/markup_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":69}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `first_line_in_markdown` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a45a636cd6cfd627a9b9cb575482d665","location":{"path":"app/helpers/markup_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":75,"end":92}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `render_wiki_content` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f59f576a0875d3e1b3150c35d4244f1f","location":{"path":"app/helpers/markup_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":124,"end":148}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `markup_unsafe` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0f734634b0f84e17e369619da7591cc9","location":{"path":"app/helpers/markup_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":150,"end":166}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `truncate_visible` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7de1befc5006684b8aac21b36b5a2eee","location":{"path":"app/helpers/markup_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":198,"end":229}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `truncate_if_block` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c65f7114f8bc0ff0c40ba17a721dc4e7","location":{"path":"app/helpers/markup_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":234,"end":243}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `issuables_helper.rb` has 354 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b0534175d956cb265e089add14a703e9","location":{"path":"app/helpers/issuables_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":436}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2697600,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `multi_label_name` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f6f2aa839b3380e86377b58408fcfa15","location":{"path":"app/helpers/issuables_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":40,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `issuable_labels_tooltip` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6ed7317a98ede04c4a1cde7f6af1871c","location":{"path":"app/helpers/issuables_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":208,"end":219}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `issuable_todo_button_data` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"382bc77616cd06810f3d2112c8460240","location":{"path":"app/helpers/issuables_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":381,"end":395}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `project_policy.rb` has 333 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"61f7a144aa6cdf7e965d3130c52aacc3","location":{"path":"app/policies/project_policy.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":434}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2395200,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `remaining_days_in_words` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"db6e21e4091f24644db9efa04f03f5f2","location":{"path":"app/serializers/entity_date_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":70}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `build_metrics` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fe3dd187f741789f765000b6e08c77bf","location":{"path":"app/serializers/merge_request_widget_entity.rb","lines":{"begin":252,"end":260}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `reassigned_issue_email` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3e2a4c8e9b4b5584a258cdc21bf1779b","location":{"path":"app/mailers/emails/issues.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":23}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `relabeled_issue_email` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"eccd65b7da076099478491ce5ffd1bcd","location":{"path":"app/mailers/emails/issues.rb","lines":{"begin":40,"end":40}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `issue_status_changed_email` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8d347450b4f4fa27b8d847a4e282b8f2","location":{"path":"app/mailers/emails/issues.rb","lines":{"begin":48,"end":48}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `issue_moved_email` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a1fb6126b5a4051ae7af19c5fd1ea1ef","location":{"path":"app/mailers/emails/issues.rb","lines":{"begin":56,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `reassigned_merge_request_email` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8bd5f4e62d9db3075aa99840c56f1dc3","location":{"path":"app/mailers/emails/merge_requests.rb","lines":{"begin":26,"end":26}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `relabeled_merge_request_email` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e4fbe646413819b74d51d11132d24f75","location":{"path":"app/mailers/emails/merge_requests.rb","lines":{"begin":34,"end":34}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `merge_request_status_email` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c39ada600f20e34ac7bc271aaa17a489","location":{"path":"app/mailers/emails/merge_requests.rb","lines":{"begin":55,"end":55}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `NotifyPreview` has 26 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0ad28a90a453e7f0892e2fa27ca7dd74","location":{"path":"app/mailers/previews/notify_preview.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":176}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1800000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `perform` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ae09aa8f81cc51243569392f706dea8b","location":{"path":"app/workers/irker_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":9}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `send_branch_updates` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2efa6a64aab186fa6e22c887b82c2da8","location":{"path":"app/workers/irker_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":61,"end":61}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `send_commits` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bda830a07ed575bd9c98deb67e6efa84","location":{"path":"app/workers/irker_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":84,"end":84}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `send_commits_count` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fe8fcb808f2da3f31174330b3b8e8d2f","location":{"path":"app/workers/irker_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":113,"end":113}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `process_commit_message` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0cbd58f4d824762ee08cbe8394a955be","location":{"path":"app/workers/process_commit_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":36,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `close_issues` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0ddd5587d752e08728eca56e8b842057","location":{"path":"app/workers/process_commit_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":45}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"00fda5cf89ca2d06f32e73e5948d2d96","location":{"path":"app/workers/process_commit_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":33}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b2d21175bd49ce0560d00b41a5d4b105","location":{"path":"app/workers/emails_on_push_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":78}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `perform` has 58 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"21b177b9c8aab67c1dd18ac4736d07e0","location":{"path":"app/workers/emails_on_push_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":78}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1392000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bc6bfd63748977ec6b13ad1bcd32f3e0","location":{"path":"app/workers/repository_import_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":30}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `perform` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ac08a8c45d58e80f3f9f0e821af8c678","location":{"path":"app/workers/create_pipeline_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":9}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `sanity_check!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1e3c40adf8befa842892c33a2ef33ef6","location":{"path":"app/workers/object_storage/migrate_uploads_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":71,"end":81}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5767377fdd633dc52d45bb5edaf792ad","location":{"path":"app/workers/object_storage/background_move_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":21}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"873b9f464ca14204612b7168bd6cd51a","location":{"path":"app/workers/repository_update_remote_mirror_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":42}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform_repository_checks` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c569f618db6dab9061d1c9a4fbd00161","location":{"path":"app/workers/repository_check/batch_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":34,"end":49}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `perform` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fb73a85eb279eea1e916d045d1752c0b","location":{"path":"app/workers/update_merge_requests_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":9}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9c731770fbe34f3e5817178bf1c1c9c2","location":{"path":"app/workers/post_receive.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":25}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `process_project_changes` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dcfa21f106c7ddc7d59ef6a69ed225a5","location":{"path":"app/workers/post_receive.rb","lines":{"begin":29,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"90ee5638594e38ee879df3d7b6670837","location":{"path":"app/workers/git_garbage_collect_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":11,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c91f311ed659a5cf472f55294f93721e","location":{"path":"app/workers/project_migrate_hashed_storage_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":22}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `handle_failure` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ea43d53b1207bf05223f6e3378b7622f","location":{"path":"app/workers/email_receiver_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fb063b327d5645323a0adeb4a475ab88","location":{"path":"app/workers/create_gpg_signature_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"90474c7bc130abea03bc8b0c1a6d72e3","location":{"path":"app/finders/concerns/finder_with_cross_project_access.rb","lines":{"begin":20,"end":32}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `by_due_date` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a7cd7e8d0b5f825ced9cce3fd0921f8b","location":{"path":"app/finders/issues_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":90}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `all_groups` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9450c1e48d60393e153d88597dff24f6","location":{"path":"app/finders/groups_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":44,"end":54}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"be7b1d323697075c6c41a353ae096f3b","location":{"path":"app/finders/environments_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":11,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `execute` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"caa84d8a4abdc89470c9734cc20f668b","location":{"path":"app/finders/environments_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":11,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `issuable_finder.rb` has 326 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a0da380c5a294186d2f8b47c7dbbefc2","location":{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":487}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2294400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `milestones` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"10f2a889ce05a62411b22bd93f5cc5fb","location":{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":195,"end":214}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `by_milestone` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4b5705f5f9e383902a98d61545a61a9f","location":{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":432,"end":447}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `IssuableFinder` has 47 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"863953770234ecee39c26f4a376fd96f","location":{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":487}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3900000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `target` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"10931dd4f683d88c8163ae49517c9ab8","location":{"path":"app/finders/notes_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":46}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `by_archived` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8a0163155f7d44abda52664f1aeec277","location":{"path":"app/finders/projects_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":153,"end":167}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `label_ids` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8efea533e852a1ae66e134916ddee3ed","location":{"path":"app/finders/labels_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":59}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `project` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dcae9d4bea82b824bf3281aee3585c28","location":{"path":"app/finders/labels_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":138,"end":149}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1b10747a7f6c51031eb2aec28a84ab64","location":{"path":"app/finders/autocomplete/users_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":27,"end":40}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `distinct_on` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"684bb4005fc7ad31c75a6725f7cc9bb4","location":{"path":"app/finders/members_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":71}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `TodosFinder` has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bda816f835a5b1d9557e5018542c8d40","location":{"path":"app/finders/todos_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":195}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1500000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_block` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2764263922dc65629ac261e7b22a4aaa","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/avoid_break_from_strong_memoize.rb","lines":{"begin":26,"end":37}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d3d826dd296b41ed52a3d279711f08c1","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/reversible_add_column_with_default.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7c2b352ab3b2b95bfd273eed48b0abde","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/update_column_in_batches.rb","lines":{"begin":14,"end":23}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1ca44c40f4350122f1d014c4832b0903","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/update_large_table.rb","lines":{"begin":52,"end":64}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"259f2282957271f68f06320d6e9c9304","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/add_reference.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_def` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1eade1345b7999362c94ffdd69c9abe5","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/add_index.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":32}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2957b0117eb58305df4d1c4f628f6e22","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/add_concurrent_index.rb","lines":{"begin":14,"end":26}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a265e4d95fda1c51004e6b280d4faa62","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/hash_index.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":35}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4642fe2fb8caa127e076b834679b38c7","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/add_column.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":35}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"53f08cb9ea1aded1c4867d5ec20513e1","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/datetime.rb","lines":{"begin":26,"end":38}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_def` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"33c826c076b3d604191dc285ae1c197f","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/remove_column.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":26}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5f6ab7199493398668d2f7fb4ae05a45","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/safer_boolean_column.rb","lines":{"begin":34,"end":58}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5d3a133fdd5733e12d588c313215673c","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/remove_concurrent_index.rb","lines":{"begin":14,"end":21}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_block` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"60e29c1a431f0815adefc57a3daa815a","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/avoid_return_from_blocks.rb","lines":{"begin":28,"end":39}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `parent_blocks` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bf710c1583fafaba0fb4a8d7507199ca","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/avoid_return_from_blocks.rb","lines":{"begin":55,"end":65}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_class` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ac6a847fc937c343670c7deedadaa245","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/code_reuse/presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":20,"end":37}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `check_all_send_nodes` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"86036271965f234231993a45bdebb14d","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/code_reuse/worker.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":46}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_class` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3468ff5bbfe02d60179b461cee64dcd2","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/code_reuse/serializer.rb","lines":{"begin":20,"end":37}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f6cd42fcfb267a05384d5c43432583d9","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/code_reuse/active_record.rb","lines":{"begin":91,"end":107}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_if` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c31d398a0e65e6ad5bf772ffbe612d27","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/line_break_around_conditional_block.rb","lines":{"begin":50,"end":58}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `autocorrect` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6790fd3dafb4732df58459faaaee4a86","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/line_break_around_conditional_block.rb","lines":{"begin":60,"end":71}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"83f3ce0952418f2d18756e7f01d3f37e","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/project_path_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":21}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this method.","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/project_path_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":18}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"16132947f8a9d308be379b39b9a5d3e6"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `perform` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"00f629cf63f892026e01afc3ea1f7651","location":{"path":"qa/qa/scenario/test/sanity/selectors.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":49}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `configure!` has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"024a3eec035772b027f91725d6217728","location":{"path":"qa/qa/runtime/browser.rb","lines":{"begin":34,"end":100}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1056000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b5bc236abe446161666817def77f8ddf","location":{"path":"qa/qa/specs/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":34}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `fabricate!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d6f04a78d84c195424103bc166feb302","location":{"path":"qa/qa/factory/repository/push.rb","lines":{"begin":33,"end":75}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1150000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `fabricate!` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0619d32fe486fa8cd5d32a978dbba114","location":{"path":"qa/qa/factory/repository/push.rb","lines":{"begin":33,"end":75}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `fabricate!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3806fbbd18c151ecd8c0b6a777c6eafd","location":{"path":"qa/qa/factory/resource/kubernetes_cluster.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":55}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `fabricate!` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9a68225ad27f7d73dc48ba5138c97cc4","location":{"path":"qa/qa/factory/resource/kubernetes_cluster.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":55}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `fabricate!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"455a528019b993508c00252ac2356d13","location":{"path":"qa/qa/factory/resource/branch.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":73}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `fabricate!` has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8c20ae555f1495416940ef8126556a4b","location":{"path":"qa/qa/factory/resource/branch.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":73}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":960000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `sign_in_using_credentials` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cf2fda789a392298297395e24cd69833","location":{"path":"qa/qa/page/main/login.rb","lines":{"begin":43,"end":60}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `expand_section` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"403c8764d8456908ed9eeef4e0044633","location":{"path":"qa/qa/page/settings/common.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":19}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Repository` has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1f47da27b9c8ebadc35daab5ecdfacbd","location":{"path":"qa/qa/git/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":126}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Base` has 36 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e990b96533b4c82f0e6c7290f79ea42e","location":{"path":"lib/declarative_policy/base.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":330}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2800000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this method.","location":{"path":"lib/declarative_policy/condition.rb","lines":{"begin":72,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"453a21507c9d4e6b09338d4ea74a2cb6"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `run` has a Cognitive Complexity of 29 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9109da1712e5180769d6dee88e01ab4b","location":{"path":"lib/declarative_policy/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":108}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `steps_by_score` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c728761c8bd550bb676d5ac29cc54f2c","location":{"path":"lib/declarative_policy/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":130,"end":179}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `steps_by_score` has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fda7518f9492e598aeaa14084a16fcad","location":{"path":"lib/declarative_policy/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":130,"end":179}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":768000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `flattened` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"938e199f4acb9d23e67b122acf7df125","location":{"path":"lib/declarative_policy/step.rb","lines":{"begin":51,"end":76}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e8ff80c1013b45a887d5b05aebda0a6d","location":{"path":"lib/mattermost/session.rb","lines":{"begin":100,"end":112}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Session` has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b6bc576e4f2b4e33eeb24fbd9a4756e0","location":{"path":"lib/mattermost/session.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":185}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `from_params` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8708d87b45e03dda5cf801ba3c8b4ae8","location":{"path":"lib/uploaded_file.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":50}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `object_link_commit` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4d75625eef2a0bac64c81e6a99b470c7","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/merge_request_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":77}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e4a7914b17bf2c4568c886ae0510580a","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/issuable_state_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c21517ccaabda5807f34857c92c02c20","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/emoji_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":11,"end":26}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5b2ff3f6e59ccd27a3e8df6e92792289","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/gollum_tags_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":87}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1150000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `build_relative_path` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1fc007ca58af10483040ad6c3acafc7b","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/relative_link_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":124,"end":140}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0d11bc0fb07cb93de54e50ca187a470c","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/inline_diff_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":20}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"229de514760543ff1eae907b8931ae4a","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/spaced_link_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":44,"end":60}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f2adb2780e68c3edecbf3243959331bc","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/abstract_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":99,"end":148}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `object_link_filter` has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"756d39528c96fdea1b53fc02cd2f1b54","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/abstract_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":161,"end":204}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `AbstractReferenceFilter` has 31 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bf8591fc0f7db3df80a7dd6204670584","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/abstract_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":359}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `call` has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"158c3e7c7c151f7461c460b58c8eb7fb","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/abstract_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":99,"end":148}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":864000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `object_link_filter` has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cce139d64bf42a05629c35156d98c24b","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/abstract_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":161,"end":204}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":840000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f009def1da08a1c0910203aacb888646","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/external_issue_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":55}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e19e0b6d7127e7778817e23a5c2202a6","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/external_link_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":23}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `highlight_node` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9dc3f1809c63dc39b3c7b301b2c8b0a8","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/syntax_highlight_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":53}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0228be52a5d55a59f39144f901ba3de8","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/user_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":28,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `user_link_filter` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e1a29dd5f3f29173136fead3b7feacff","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/user_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":61,"end":75}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c56c41f7c09938431d527c9d84ee464c","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/project_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":26,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"23c5be476e6cfabb3f50b8995a21481e","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/autolink_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":51,"end":67}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `autolink_match` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"63ef57bb6d5d4556a6d292a19e1eb7aa","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/autolink_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":79,"end":116}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `remove_unsafe_links` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"578c89c0c495a9f9912ae5425a9baf35","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/sanitization_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":91}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `remove_unsafe_table_style` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"66ae1f700aade40e1b93928de1809522","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/sanitization_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":101,"end":114}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `process_link_attr` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fe0e7a59ae612e2391ff8956ece5a37e","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/absolute_link_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"91ceeacf382258ddf799f7e8df323086","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/commit_trailers_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":29,"end":43}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `link_to_user` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2cae91969679378626a39ee56d06c378","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/commit_trailers_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":81,"end":115}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"complex_logic","content":{"body":""},"description":"Consider simplifying this complex logical expression.","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/math_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":27,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":400000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"c132e79b1733f1ef2e4fba2f07f29935"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"88347949c1ff362bde8f0c3f4fe03dc2","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/table_of_contents_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_parent` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b3d0438ee7565d4ad0316ba6f05a9baf","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/table_of_contents_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":102,"end":115}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `nodes_visible_to_user` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c851d1fc927d9308df218d02f42fde99","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/reference_parser/user_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":25,"end":48}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `nodes_user_can_reference` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bfa5e9970213f7ef43f0e22780710fb3","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/reference_parser/user_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":87}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `grouped_objects_for_nodes` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"56d2576cd012b6e37a94c3cac839a5fd","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/reference_parser/base_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":134,"end":147}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `BaseParser` has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3b65d4312cddf7542466b907246e6568","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/reference_parser/base_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":34,"end":255}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `cache_collection_render` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"86955f7d246e45efcedaab9abac1b39e","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/renderer.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":103}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `filter_nodes_at_beginning` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"575e435b81c0cb589731931503f3f7ef","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/querying.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":64}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `initialize` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a1435f7fb2485ddc0076596fa851b5e1","location":{"path":"lib/file_size_validator.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":17}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `check_validity!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4c0eea681bcd3ea73ab99bdeb9992c52","location":{"path":"lib/file_size_validator.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":33}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_each` has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4ad97d789c0a7bb2c49b85af370fa1cb","location":{"path":"lib/file_size_validator.rb","lines":{"begin":36,"end":65}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `projects.rb` has 419 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"de2195ccf1e60f3a00e250b69809f314","location":{"path":"lib/api/projects.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":513}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3633600,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `apply_filters` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3d37733ec13b40a7294cb95cca30d7c0","location":{"path":"lib/api/projects.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":27}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `entities.rb` has 1174 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"14ca44a7292f309674c3e6bf5668d68a","location":{"path":"lib/api/entities.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":1469}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":14505600,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create_note` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5bdd6d096b03346b779bae1a47c5df19","location":{"path":"lib/api/helpers/notes_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":89,"end":101}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_job!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9c2df515fd3e4e567e5c43ce34122ebc","location":{"path":"lib/api/helpers/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":34,"end":42}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `filter_runners` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8fe97bd7f7ff40f6f347505c5401de55","location":{"path":"lib/api/runners.rb","lines":{"begin":163,"end":176}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `authenticate_show_runner!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"678c4afecdf242daef2608fb52f16121","location":{"path":"lib/api/runners.rb","lines":{"begin":184,"end":188}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `authenticate_delete_runner!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"229dc324c7b4cd0754d3f429d0efa489","location":{"path":"lib/api/runners.rb","lines":{"begin":196,"end":201}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `authenticate_enable_runner!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fdde7223cb136c51a33619a48b7e10e9","location":{"path":"lib/api/runners.rb","lines":{"begin":203,"end":210}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `issues.rb` has 266 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"49d5eae8f5a9b7ef20af4a226580c9fb","location":{"path":"lib/api/issues.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":332}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1430400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `filter_builds` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b03e3d209e73511af90d54684b559d3a","location":{"path":"lib/api/jobs.rb","lines":{"begin":176,"end":185}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `list_milestones_for` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8e051bd18be2af43510bfc934382e630","location":{"path":"lib/api/milestone_responses.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":37}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `assign_file_vars!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4be22423f2ecad963ae6b37b42f43510","location":{"path":"lib/api/files.rb","lines":{"begin":25,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `assign_blob_vars!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e73cbaada1130cabaf0dfa4c08f70656","location":{"path":"lib/api/repositories.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":35}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `services.rb` has 836 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"68db3252fd8eaa9d286783dcd5099377","location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":864}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":9638400,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `runner.rb` has 266 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1e11149dffed6dc2e322c584638327bf","location":{"path":"lib/api/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":316}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1430400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `merge_requests.rb` has 322 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3de9fe3d6f81552276ac816a0f052fb7","location":{"path":"lib/api/merge_requests.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":398}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2236800,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `handle_merge_request_errors!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4b0820e7ae582cfc463b18401dc7dfd6","location":{"path":"lib/api/merge_requests.rb","lines":{"begin":145,"end":159}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `helpers.rb` has 381 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5db68c679d275d3963e0f9660988e103","location":{"path":"lib/api/helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":533}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3086400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `attributes_for_keys` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"63712b203f7a63b38bcb9eea53c3001d","location":{"path":"lib/api/helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":289,"end":299}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `project_finder_params` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"268f87eb93bd855d1807610fcddd6efe","location":{"path":"lib/api/helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":408,"end":420}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `present_carrierwave_file!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"360f85bdb8a06a280a62224143731f15","location":{"path":"lib/api/helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":440,"end":452}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `sudo!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ddabeb34a3b3e3067c6b88323ce10dcc","location":{"path":"lib/api/helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":468,"end":487}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `users.rb` has 652 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"da0cb2b4e7ad1056fa1e4f7a0fc774d7","location":{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":837}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":6988800,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_groups` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"eea17dfbc1a8fa0837c83d51e2708400","location":{"path":"lib/api/groups.rb","lines":{"begin":42,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `inject_rblineprof` has a Cognitive Complexity of 49 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"16157b2c336822ada397c30b37d0e63b","location":{"path":"lib/peek/rblineprof/custom_controller_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":100}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":4550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `inject_rblineprof` has 62 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9665938c091b2575d937990fbc609dac","location":{"path":"lib/peek/rblineprof/custom_controller_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":100}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1488000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `flatten_comments` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3acab7e81bc6f21925b3944dc13c9d25","location":{"path":"lib/bitbucket_server/representation/comment.rb","lines":{"begin":87,"end":111}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `check_errors!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5656af648a8148a4747d9750b93c8a0c","location":{"path":"lib/bitbucket_server/connection.rb","lines":{"begin":62,"end":74}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `extract_ref` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8b8bde6183c235753993662c791c5f50","location":{"path":"lib/extracts_path.rb","lines":{"begin":40,"end":74}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `assign_ref_vars` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"994b000ce7697f00c9d2fdef6d5f219c","location":{"path":"lib/extracts_path.rb","lines":{"begin":108,"end":133}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `gitaly_configuration_toml` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7ce1b00e1e01659ed25ab9357f9d47d7","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/setup_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":14,"end":43}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_with_user_password` has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0212b6bdb5ef9f95aaaad8df3d25a15a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":83}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1150000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `rate_limit!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"18c084f7a7640dd9934777afe795d6e1","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth.rb","lines":{"begin":85,"end":104}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `service_request_check` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fcdcb167117e9fbdc60bcccfa8c52ce9","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth.rb","lines":{"begin":112,"end":128}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `deploy_token_check` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3349988ec83e4933b92c3a7e3824cc58","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth.rb","lines":{"begin":185,"end":199}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `lfs_token_check` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4f1a1535569de597558d429c01457d5e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth.rb","lines":{"begin":202,"end":228}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `build_access_token_check` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1e8fcdca34d7247788de08e6051143d2","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth.rb","lines":{"begin":230,"end":245}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `setup_subscribers` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"85ca5972d830d83ef927532dcf66122f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/performance_bar/peek_query_tracker.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `fields` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dbfd2a1c630915fc2b4befaca081c456","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/slash_commands/presenters/issue_base.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":39}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `format_response` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"57bd6ed972d21a41e82e376f51d7a76e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/slash_commands/presenters/base.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":58}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `text` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0fea0819cd1d628d704dab5f9f56ae5c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/slash_commands/presenters/issue_show.rb","lines":{"begin":40,"end":53}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `file.rb` has 255 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bcd7afc2511311acf93e48f89b257ee8","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/file.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":356}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1272000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `simple_viewer_class` has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"455a703cf96823be99c475db08de0c9f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/file.rb","lines":{"begin":311,"end":339}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `viewer_class_from` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cae1cebb92d35a5859ef229108d1e4c1","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/file.rb","lines":{"begin":345,"end":353}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `File` has 54 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4872155d7a8ab149e4dbfdd0a34d314f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/file.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":354}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":4600000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `simple_viewer_class` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c663249a7eb69d79d53815c02da1287e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/file.rb","lines":{"begin":311,"end":339}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `initialize` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"62d56326c2f46a050e8a9f1219488e25","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/line.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":10}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Position` has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"44aef8e9a5055d83b7605ef01a8ffcd5","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/position.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":150}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1400000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `highlight` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"922e6aee35a311a79f1043b07ee7064d","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/highlight.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":44}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `highlight_line` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b41f2627f4109bdc5b74287cf3ba0d21","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/highlight.rb","lines":{"begin":48,"end":64}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `parallelize` has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"631e96ad1ef01b07245ee2a542d76275","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/parallel_diff.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":58}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1150000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `parallelize` has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c801b9d4ce1a0b15a92b13570e4b4a73","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/parallel_diff.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":58}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":840000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `diff_stats_collection` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d1edfc550eecbd5daa471adab0ab3385","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/file_collection/base.rb","lines":{"begin":50,"end":59}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `parse` has a Cognitive Complexity of 29 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bfc88a6b4fdafecdb4881ebd0a709e90","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/parser.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":63}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `parse` has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6d81f9668924e2328ae1d3b978012b2e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/parser.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":63}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1008000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `trace` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"678e46609976cce578070c879cdeaa09","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/position_tracer.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":86}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `trace_added_line` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3d3253565d5f52fdc8e227a610a4ba02","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/position_tracer.rb","lines":{"begin":90,"end":127}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `trace_removed_line` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7a2345cd4720ceb59ce0efdf2c931d70","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/position_tracer.rb","lines":{"begin":129,"end":158}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `trace_unchanged_line` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"68d033636c672cf93801ba4a440a9b10","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/position_tracer.rb","lines":{"begin":160,"end":199}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `map_line_number` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dc329e8839fe1c0b24ddd3dbaa5b8485","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/line_mapper.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":61}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `popen_with_detail` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1f3016518aa9a963248a02cac889fd75","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/popen.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `request_cache` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c7f577fa9ce2f42e5f27aac8db514fe3","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/cache/request_cache.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":58}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `store_in_cache_if_needed` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"baa77c71d04626f49bd5c1e57a0e2ca9","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/cache/ci/project_pipeline_status.rb","lines":{"begin":92,"end":100}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `aggregate_rblineprof` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5c969b511dec60cc5ae82a493581e987","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sherlock/line_profiler.rb","lines":{"begin":59,"end":85}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `subscribe_to_active_record` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cb47c9a23a0a444f0c02f2ce82101c23","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sherlock/transaction.rb","lines":{"begin":88,"end":96}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `remove_keys_not_found_in_db` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"110e16cf8bc4b13203ae16707be71f9e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/shell.rb","lines":{"begin":229,"end":246}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Shell` has 37 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9bb914cee67608b26add7bcc4f81b00b","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/shell.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":445}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2900000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `bulk_insert` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"46738c8e24da7d644d4613d9605d7262","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database.rb","lines":{"begin":167,"end":197}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `each` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f71d3611436ba9323475933db3b224e0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/conflict_files_stitcher.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":26}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `each` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a4899ef1be9285a53b4a3412a311ee1f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/blobs_stitcher.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `update_page` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5e1fe756db8adf0384ead3d7ca4d40bb","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/wiki_service.rb","lines":{"begin":41,"end":41}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_file` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f2ac95cd9282cf75ce51181ba7bcf087","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/wiki_service.rb","lines":{"begin":128,"end":152}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `wiki_page_from_iterator` has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8d18749d8e89aa853f84d5b8ab2fa1e0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/wiki_service.rb","lines":{"begin":171,"end":192}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `commit_service.rb` has 334 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"459baf31c3d4b57e8c9df845211d85c9","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/commit_service.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":431}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2409600,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `diff` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6776fdb83e8edfae5378441fd52a4925","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/commit_service.rb","lines":{"begin":33,"end":63}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `tree_entry` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"00baf604adba61e863f7d154a8dee72b","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/commit_service.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":109}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_commit` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"186f0eba8b7425edc8cc3c73c38cd40a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/commit_service.rb","lines":{"begin":242,"end":262}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `CommitService` has 31 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"49c846fd451fa9152c64a84b18cea747","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/commit_service.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":429}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `ref_service.rb` has 252 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"eb1efcba78462f496979baf4cb6cd2ad","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":327}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1228800,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `RefService` has 31 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"00c5cfab9191c2db4747039325616652","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":325}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `repository_service.rb` has 323 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"493989beb71c8d830c2b79d5553c6147","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/repository_service.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":396}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2251200,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `fetch_remote` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f3aee0aba331f59ab18ffef3792b052a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/repository_service.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":81}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `RepositoryService` has 35 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6ca9b3950e1ce99211058bd24b696cd9","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/repository_service.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":394}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2700000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `user_squash` has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3244c060b29a67dfaca14f5fd90c0c69","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/operation_service.rb","lines":{"begin":207,"end":207}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":525000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `user_commit_files` has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e11b9bf00977dfd40d466849a02aad7e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/operation_service.rb","lines":{"begin":234,"end":235}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":600000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `user_commit_files_request_header` has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"74f8cedbd2e30f093d96c68640b17e2f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/operation_service.rb","lines":{"begin":316,"end":317}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":600000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `operation_service.rb` has 284 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e9b10e91d8aa4aecb2dd40e2ff73151e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/operation_service.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":343}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1689600,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `user_create_branch` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f83bdf53147b9d2930979ca6a622f44f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/operation_service.rb","lines":{"begin":48,"end":69}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `user_merge_branch` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"96dce6cec3c6d464fe3b164bf05adf61","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/operation_service.rb","lines":{"begin":101,"end":137}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `user_commit_files` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b324bd9e25781ee4f45ebe63530654b5","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/operation_service.rb","lines":{"begin":233,"end":274}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `define_predicate_methods` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1748406e1b1a3efed8bbdbc2f7310efb","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/fake_application_settings.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":19}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `read` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"306bfd1a5668c64b46f9a50ffcb84761","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/http_io.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":100}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `get_chunk` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"718a1c6197d9172beada51e8fb725aa8","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/http_io.rb","lines":{"begin":147,"end":173}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `HttpIO` has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f90f3bbe0002c0551d2c102e8d6cc2bb","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/http_io.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":192}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `system_usage_data` has 49 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e44de166e4765b13674da7e6f1adbb03","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/usage_data.rb","lines":{"begin":35,"end":85}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1176000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `print_methods` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"74e543934a1cb0119b1cb9bc2bef6f4a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/profiler/total_time_flat_printer.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `format_issue_comment_body` has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4b9885935625732368d27f4d57c09a6b","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/google_code_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":327,"end":327}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `importer.rb` has 283 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1456110a9f0cea86dbda2fdc6ff8b006","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/google_code_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":371}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1675200,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_issues` has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fda606a33fed0d051037b3e7ec312764","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/google_code_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":82,"end":126}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1150000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_issue_comments` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e40d64a7ad3fca74d9f0603fcdfde073","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/google_code_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":146,"end":179}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `format_updates` has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"627781504f289b64edb3cae5ded46686","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/google_code_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":237,"end":293}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `format_attachments` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3eae70f0804e77646cf183b658337852","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/google_code_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":312,"end":325}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `import_issues` has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"140622e56443443be6d89cf7f8134759","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/google_code_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":82,"end":126}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":792000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `import_issue_comments` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"81d77c1a0b5ebc4248e39438a9b784c1","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/google_code_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":146,"end":179}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `format_updates` has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9b843b25138348d8d9e7cf6df7a2f0ed","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/google_code_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":237,"end":293}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1032000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `full_path` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"200d2aea21e0c3f34efb9b3a8051a82f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/rename_reserved_paths_migration/v1/migration_classes.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":15}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `rank_rows` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dc13ef2bef6a33cc8bc4e67b71564878","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/median.rb","lines":{"begin":140,"end":174}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `migration_helpers.rb` has 543 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"01e21ae134d30a14bd512652b7a940ab","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":1078}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":5419200,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `add_timestamps_with_timezone` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c59bbcc4bf6935d5c169f128844c4c91","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":40}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `add_concurrent_foreign_key` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ce151ede627cdfdf31c565ade50905ea","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":152,"end":206}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `disable_statement_timeout` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"31b96e31df6242d18aba1d4abf07f1f9","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":240,"end":272}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `update_column_in_batches` has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"21d13cfd466605197c31d8958201310c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":323,"end":380}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1150000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `add_column_with_default` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"009915036d7d7932903bc6f766511a5e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":406,"end":438}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `copy_indexes` has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"60d019b8234aa4a0d7d445a95ee1e8ae","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":817,"end":859}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `bulk_queue_background_migration_jobs_by_range` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"128bc9f2059885db7d254bdb6a31d4b3","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":972,"end":993}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `add_concurrent_foreign_key` has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f6243b1ac45a70775392f6137b36e35f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":152,"end":206}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":768000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `update_column_in_batches` has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6dc99342ecbf79855eb8044b9e00cbdd","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":323,"end":380}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":888000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `change_column_type_using_background_migration` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"39133c1e5a2502598dbf0ec8dc0af798","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":593,"end":640}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `rename_column_using_background_migration` has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fc89feb63b650bd5547ac2ba44210012","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":670,"end":731}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":768000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `copy_indexes` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8b98ee08501009b6bf421b8064689b30","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":817,"end":859}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `fetch_config` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4b3b0f6bd727a62eae22091574b81015","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/mail_room.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":49}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `note_url` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"59ca4f1b16f978d96a1c7e36f7e69d62","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/url_builder.rb","lines":{"begin":52,"end":71}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `rewrite` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f45f6ba5c50a0ab576b49cf1b282a615","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gfm/uploads_rewriter.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `unfold_reference` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"be381321436537b6ec6941dcff14d0b9","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gfm/reference_rewriter.rb","lines":{"begin":56,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `sections` has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0f6b50ef494458ae4f54e52a28568869","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/conflict/file.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":110}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_match_line_header` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4fef2b9774e94d0bd02f1158378f701c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/conflict/file.rb","lines":{"begin":123,"end":137}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `as_json` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ed7b03c5a2c2d110a9a9db9e00f3d8d0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/conflict/file.rb","lines":{"begin":150,"end":168}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `sections` has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"629b80d357b767eb9b1f37185affacd4","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/conflict/file.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":110}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":864000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `which` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"565d3b45775f71100b9c7277076be0f6","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/utils.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":74}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `render_go_doc` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e0fac0dd89237b115b26def1d32171a6","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/middleware/go.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":33}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `with_open_files` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"83c9d42c4a44fe57eeee2a2b269ddb60","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/middleware/multipart.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":57}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `decorate_params_value` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"32d0634549f8a039069852514c0c4e20","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/middleware/multipart.rb","lines":{"begin":60,"end":82}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `initialize` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"100b77808e789566083b5722f853d491","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/legacy_github_import/project_creator.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":6}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_issues` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3bfd1976bd1c3f5b63ad73183773103c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/legacy_github_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":117,"end":136}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_pull_requests` has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d3b76e6c4972600af102835c1739459a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/legacy_github_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":139,"end":165}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create_comments` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8131d9fa54052fb8688da41fca5b29ff","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/legacy_github_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":222,"end":245}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_wiki` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c9017489731af795ba61fdc442e91922","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/legacy_github_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":266,"end":278}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_releases` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6cf70c97f808766cb57657e58420cb89","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/legacy_github_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":280,"end":291}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Importer` has 27 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"564493c4d63110500702ce8552822c02","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/legacy_github_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":339}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1900000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `each_object_to_import` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1c46822af079d421dee8173b07f3b80a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/github_import/parallel_scheduling.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":106}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `each_page` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d8e73017cc50cf5ae0ff94ea436d3ced","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/github_import/client.rb","lines":{"begin":91,"end":112}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `with_rate_limit` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f8e67dd27500a710187cc201ddc1dded","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/github_import/client.rb","lines":{"begin":133,"end":149}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Client` has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8c409ff9cd79515f70c131a687a58c2d","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/github_import/client.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":216}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1400000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create_sub_relations` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"de78150728d4deb7bbd23ae848875928","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/import_export/project_tree_restorer.rb","lines":{"begin":134,"end":159}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `process_sub_relation` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"357889b554818506acea0dfc8f000afc","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/import_export/project_tree_restorer.rb","lines":{"begin":161,"end":171}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e960e3648215aee14c4e5443b5f897b0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/import_export/after_export_strategies/base_after_export_strategy.rb","lines":{"begin":27,"end":49}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `build!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1dd9f4457d861e5b12020c99ef408fe4","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/import_export/after_export_strategy_builder.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":17}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `parse!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"343742e2d2dc60bd360734eccf276cc8","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/import_export/merge_request_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":22}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `copy_project_uploads` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d141822a7e49c9987620bcbcaf7749c0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/import_export/uploads_manager.rb","lines":{"begin":44,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Importer` has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9b57d9528846dda6448ed9d3a49747c3","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/import_export/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":129}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `imported_object` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7150a66352dfbd84b82e4bfa60942b90","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/import_export/relation_factory.rb","lines":{"begin":198,"end":209}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `RelationFactory` has 30 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4f17a460cbd29b77fbb38f05dd3866a4","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/import_export/relation_factory.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":281}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2200000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `project_attributes` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"80346e71805b8ddd466c6b77a8f2e1e6","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/import_export/group_project_object_builder.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":62}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `build` has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"34c8251c050af78b0e432e62b3bf6eaf","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/data_builder/push.rb","lines":{"begin":56,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":525000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `build` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e5d84ee4338c67ad951b6130bf67d21a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/data_builder/push.rb","lines":{"begin":56,"end":98}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `build` has 49 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ac9809b4ea4dd090261cab4784070118","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/data_builder/build.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":68}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1176000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `absolute_image_urls` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b291bb28522abd9dde68b0387000c263","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/hook_data/base_builder.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":35}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `safe_hook_attributes` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"682e99b5b83244042ccc251929255272","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/hook_data/merge_request_builder.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":32}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `gitaly_client.rb` has 321 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"aa680293a25a35a2aacd0db231b38fc3","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":484}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2222400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"96a0315d42972363e3be0faaf33fcff8","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client.rb","lines":{"begin":124,"end":149}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `request_kwargs` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"62070bc24b2fd5133e0a7beab00d9b77","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client.rb","lines":{"begin":197,"end":221}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `feature_enabled?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"731633ec642f522eb73bf54d30cc752d","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client.rb","lines":{"begin":239,"end":269}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `enforce_gitaly_request_limits` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a75016ab6541606469d82939c599b4ad","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client.rb","lines":{"begin":317,"end":340}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `issues` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"625fb557175f1173f5275a5c774ad3d6","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/reference_extractor.rb","lines":{"begin":34,"end":45}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `metrics` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"77acda463966e33d89aa2e8120528ca8","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/health_checks/simple_abstract_check.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":25}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `profile` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fee59aefc8f7079890f207651b7981f0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/profiler.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":79}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `debug` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fdc82615456346012b61b614b718e980","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/profiler.rb","lines":{"begin":91,"end":109}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `protected_branch_push_checks` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"32eb78f0c97e724ad8a8d5553b542d3f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/checks/change_access.rb","lines":{"begin":89,"end":99}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `protected_tag_checks` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"06f719f8ef5751a719db79c5e8c24be7","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/checks/change_access.rb","lines":{"begin":111,"end":120}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `ChangeAccess` has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c155eb2e64ad1ed777bca59ce76dbaef","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/checks/change_access.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":214}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1700000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8ee7f543cac7d3fb2d03c2cf82f45f09","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/checks/commit_check.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":28}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `stop` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0578d528100ce788878962a15cbeec2a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/daemon.rb","lines":{"begin":39,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `verification_status` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"278e4598e8040e0a02ba62435277a8b2","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gpg/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":100,"end":112}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `initialize` has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"26ed72f706cbd880946abd65775661b1","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/bitbucket_server_import/project_creator.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":6}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":525000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `importer.rb` has 275 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"144e11b64a9050685cd582324f4c5650","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/bitbucket_server_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":388}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1560000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Importer` has 28 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fe99b8de0e4e755d01efc8644f28aa32","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/bitbucket_server_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":386}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2000000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `ensure_hash` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"32c1c4d58157c12dafbd9c492c51a5aa","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/graphql/variables.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":34}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `instrument` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d95b586a43aa6e99b3f767263ce65d16","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/graphql/present/instrumentation.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":32}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `instrument` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7b1d8edac9e190461296777cc29e22e5","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/graphql/authorize/instrumentation.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `instrument_methods` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d1438aadd557c25b108eea0106855664","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/instrumentation.rb","lines":{"begin":70,"end":81}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `instrument_instance_methods` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"eb2114fa42977c795cf347169a0f542c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/instrumentation.rb","lines":{"begin":88,"end":99}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `instrument` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bca595f2e9128a833295cec69e8c1e4e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/instrumentation.rb","lines":{"begin":118,"end":167}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `instrument` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"46dbb1e9f69c06f7d078548fc6061570","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/instrumentation.rb","lines":{"begin":118,"end":167}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `submit` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b4ef0ec3fde55c4188a9f170e0f50760","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/transaction.rb","lines":{"begin":114,"end":129}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `submit_metrics` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9b54961b8f59db3e5122c4208ded0a04","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/influx_db.rb","lines":{"begin":48,"end":62}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `pool` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"85d4413ec95715375e2c5ed3923bf252","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/influx_db.rb","lines":{"begin":165,"end":181}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `measure` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9ce1cb49fa0e90749c14924f01742eab","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/influx_db.rb","lines":{"begin":95,"end":133}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `initialize` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"04b6cf203bf783b43e1ac1b54b888441","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/fogbugz_import/project_creator.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":6}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `format_issue_comment_body` has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1ec61e94902238cc9befa5a1daf367e9","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/fogbugz_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":279,"end":279}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_cases` has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"deff1dce2bf92e8e8a73a7dad5c4c5c9","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/fogbugz_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":102,"end":146}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_issue_comments` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3399ad65a3497aa307eaeb32cb5e83e6","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/fogbugz_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":158,"end":196}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `import_cases` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cdbe17ce063af3997de1ea4bb7b62f8b","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/fogbugz_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":102,"end":146}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `import_issue_comments` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a350dd17c12b659d965d2849ad05d077","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/fogbugz_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":158,"end":196}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `git_access.rb` has 288 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"217b36994b7bc085e2426b68d5ae12da","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git_access.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":372}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1747200,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `check_authentication_abilities!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"12742436ece459400a3eaf9d0a1bb60c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git_access.rb","lines":{"begin":128,"end":139}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `ensure_project_on_push!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"96a9f1789e7e7f1f1ba2da1e54b194c6","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git_access.rb","lines":{"begin":189,"end":213}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `check_push_access!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3ea1e3ce0a376bfea8bcf0212ff90809","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git_access.rb","lines":{"begin":233,"end":251}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `GitAccess` has 41 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8b604fd91125836b6b7febd9f9706b53","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git_access.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":371}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create_service_account` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ede2112edc62f1c1aaab207b4d2d3bb8","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/api.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":59}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create_cluster_role_binding` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"35fbb979c3d0eb66f9ca187bb5295521","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/api.rb","lines":{"begin":61,"end":71}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `initialize` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a6788548613abbede0f945c93f499e01","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/bitbucket_import/project_creator.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":6}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_issues` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dc7e6d5a30b4b296140a3b3ef8f0e44a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/bitbucket_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":106}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_issue_comments` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a48dbffa8fed1a096624520d3125343e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/bitbucket_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":109,"end":134}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_pull_requests` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5a484ad1bd84dce7a3bef35405340b71","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/bitbucket_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":147,"end":183}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `import_pull_requests` has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bb107ec4ecd65c38b8c57821b432e1bd","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/bitbucket_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":147,"end":183}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":744000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `get_info` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9ccb0c18a6f37f110aadd6045933f910","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/auth_hash.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `tls_options` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f8cf4abbbf7c74ebb10433a1b19d6e25","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/config.rb","lines":{"begin":210,"end":227}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Config` has 38 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d8bf80e499225a5522c5bf02c2b5de50","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/config.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":248}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3000000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `allowed?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1b6717c2575d1b9634403637d926a53e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/access.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":32}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `allowed?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1b6717c2575d1b9634403637d926a53e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/access.rb","lines":{"begin":41,"end":63}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `ldap_search` has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5d595594b703b1d9783bd955a198807f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/adapter.rb","lines":{"begin":52,"end":83}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1150000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `each_pair` has a Cognitive Complexity of 43 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0b175175ba20f21bb15cdf8c88896cd1","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/dn.rb","lines":{"begin":58,"end":194}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `initialize_array` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d6d33eb81193471d4408113ca113deac","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/dn.rb","lines":{"begin":267,"end":281}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `each_pair` has 131 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"648c4eb09b87d49a1d79f5d0a77de3ea","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/dn.rb","lines":{"begin":58,"end":194}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3144000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `login` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c350e7d285ce68091161b324ed9ca293","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/authentication.rb","lines":{"begin":11,"end":20}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `save` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5b220e2f520a6fff2f90c05ba11999ba","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/o_auth/user.rb","lines":{"begin":37,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_user` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7a4874f3ff061cb0b1aeef04800ada15","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/o_auth/user.rb","lines":{"begin":60,"end":69}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `update_profile` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"38ded984fa19d27580db26e0540ac53f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/o_auth/user.rb","lines":{"begin":229,"end":253}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `User` has 32 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e416592e77f689818995fceca5f571bc","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/o_auth/user.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":268}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2400000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_user` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ba2b8382483d9be5260822909fe26d56","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/saml/user.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":28}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `cache_method_output` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"173a260b95048ce7cfc5164ebeeaa45c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/repository_cache_adapter.rb","lines":{"begin":44,"end":70}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `expire_method_caches` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6938667a593219bc8d59f8046973c533","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/repository_cache_adapter.rb","lines":{"begin":73,"end":86}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `mark` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7f23977dd6af02c109c5ecaf6ec88e79","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/string_range_marker.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":45}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `position_mapping` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"75e44855c1190acfa386bf060fe0c79c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/string_range_marker.rb","lines":{"begin":50,"end":88}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `log_response` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7bd641d0b563cc47dc64d5b378494dd5","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/storage_check/cli.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":68}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_permission!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"596d8f0ed603043a25830a78af0b7870","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/email/handler/reply_processing.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6fac16f8fc80d183ffc78d03d2d0245d","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/email/handler/unsubscribe_handler.rb","lines":{"begin":15,"end":23}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `select_body` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"74ea18f19435d9abee264cd1facce76a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/email/reply_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":36,"end":58}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `fix_charset` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bbfbab207f44913ec99bdb0f738ef744","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/email/reply_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":61,"end":71}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `target_url` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"587a65f54b3a9d4006c9fb8e97881295","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/email/message/repository_push.rb","lines":{"begin":96,"end":108}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `subject` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"304068a60d47ba6b4d63d0770a3e66e0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/email/message/repository_push.rb","lines":{"begin":118,"end":137}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `run!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"06bf786acefc4467f3887ce0b97790b0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/cleanup/remote_uploads.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":32}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `steal` has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bcfc4aae2401e33076da306af1be4a91","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":38}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7f4a6a0b5a98750c352c1646b1b3f685","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/url_blocker.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":37}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `redis_store_options` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8e3b7658d5f2da0b6cfe80e375fba17a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/redis/wrapper.rb","lines":{"begin":94,"end":116}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `calculate` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"027f65d9b15a5a20ac32b7746317815a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/project_authorizations/with_nested_groups.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":57}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `allowed?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5ffe0c3e3d42265eae2251a019292113","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/user_access.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":38}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `can_push_to_branch?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"303070bb63eb58bcb7a05b3b95932900","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/user_access.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":75}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `sanitize` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ce964ef0b84100c7c6ad7cb863485dc1","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ssh_public_key.rb","lines":{"begin":24,"end":38}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8bb3319e6987280746e3bc73708c56f0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/bare_repository_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":27}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `to_kubeconfig` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b447110ec4376566b0f143ec7955f597","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/kubernetes.rb","lines":{"begin":85,"end":115}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `extract_filters` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"52f2917ff84bcee853228888bc9d4f20","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/search/query.rb","lines":{"begin":28,"end":48}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `encode!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5023e6a2cc1fe373219230a4ada29baa","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/encoding_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `encode_utf8` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c7dee9a09179a88f06945225a2a221af","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/encoding_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":51,"end":69}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `handle_exception_response` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0c36580ef2976c77eabf04d27eda6e0b","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/prometheus_client.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":87}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `generate_full_url` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6347a85ed559890640d3146272847334","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/url_sanitizer.rb","lines":{"begin":71,"end":78}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `convert` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"427e98fa770dd0ce1ed98ef15ec75fd5","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/ansi2html.rb","lines":{"begin":136,"end":189}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `open_new_tag` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3d7e5bd9e7a6c35c9d687fc490695bed","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/ansi2html.rb","lines":{"begin":232,"end":256}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `get_xterm_color_class` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4936b554b5287229c74930b44325b20c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/ansi2html.rb","lines":{"begin":329,"end":341}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Converter` has 69 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"61a0cb2a3f0303ed57f185452426b79a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/ansi2html.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":346}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":6100000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `convert` has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dd13e7297553d67e7801e8ccc8eed932","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/ansi2html.rb","lines":{"begin":136,"end":189}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1032000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `matches_pattern?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ebde1954a4f6fc95ac088dde003d1f7c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/build/policy/refs.rb","lines":{"begin":27,"end":38}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `match_entries` has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"12277d192b4e56c2980eae35423fc226","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/build/artifacts/metadata.rb","lines":{"begin":54,"end":76}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `read_version` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c8c5a0217b6a28198bd8cb92d0e82b00","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/build/artifacts/metadata.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":92}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Entry` has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a996c8f128cfc7543769dd21dd5de815","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/build/artifacts/metadata/entry.rb","lines":{"begin":15,"end":130}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `to_s` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6710c7eee920701d15361f52dbe4bd3d","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/build/artifacts/path.rb","lines":{"begin":26,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `read` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"481c8d08e5e47d4a4d4be68d0d06fe4b","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace/chunked_io.rb","lines":{"begin":69,"end":93}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `chunk_slice_from_offset` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"60dbbad2af42b5e9d17acf1180b8e0d6","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace/chunked_io.rb","lines":{"begin":178,"end":189}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `ChunkedIO` has 26 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3f6175d5d4d29675f68a7afb44b51fb3","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace/chunked_io.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":236}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1800000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `extract_coverage` has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a126d9b81c791cb0bd1b8cd455422f3b","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace/stream.rb","lines":{"begin":79,"end":102}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `handle_line` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6e13932e33f438288cd2d7a23cca7b04","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace/section_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":56,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_next_marker` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7b78b80d610593251ebbeb9bb18f6246","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace/section_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":93}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_string_or_regexp` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a99d0cd045678d388fd755c238f7757f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/config/entry/legacy_validation_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":43,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `to_hash` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bc0685829f332ba16f511159006c4cf9","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/config/entry/job.rb","lines":{"begin":136,"end":155}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `variables_expressions_syntax` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"736e4fd1de9745ba1bb433fcb5443516","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/config/entry/policy.rb","lines":{"begin":41,"end":53}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `attributes` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"69c16e006586bdd7ac4cb17f7ede9848","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/config/entry/attributable.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":21}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `helpers` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2d39bb63c3e71381a6cfd8d51654bee4","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/config/entry/configurable.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":75}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `extend!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4fa7fe12ebb0fe9c7eed89e17ece5daf","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/config/extendable/entry.rb","lines":{"begin":48,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `write` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4254fbcc9b1008e1fd6a644e17f14b44","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace.rb","lines":{"begin":83,"end":101}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `unsafe_archive!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b90c223da9c451bd90087645954fe5ee","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace.rb","lines":{"begin":125,"end":145}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Trace` has 26 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d9e217fe03ddebc9f270b441d4194d76","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":237}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1800000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"56ff592ebb6677c3a386b683db2b6821","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/pipeline/chain/validate/config.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":21}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `tokenize` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"60a6e3ebf3ba798ac11eca1daba671b8","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/pipeline/expression/lexer.rb","lines":{"begin":36,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `tree` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"494fb3f15182110d4c2051f9a07b9ddc","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/pipeline/expression/parser.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `all_cases` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4f41f387d6f9c748719d97b454bbe92f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/parsers/junit.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":37}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_job_dependencies!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"97a1046ed696c51fb2ce1bf34f0b7293","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/yaml_processor.rb","lines":{"begin":139,"end":151}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_on_stop_job!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"06fcc3fed9dc213e5669186830670f59","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/yaml_processor.rb","lines":{"begin":161,"end":180}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `check` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5f09e73f4a1aa8458ce984db4f5fce37","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/downtime_check.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":40}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `parse_entry` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4f46e2835f32393dfdf07c66c0f704d0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/route_map.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e2058f84cad6a346389ce944d7c1c76e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/upgrader.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":25}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `fuzzy_arel_match` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"44164fac144fbfeea45df1508dfe02db","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sql/pattern.rb","lines":{"begin":32,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `lazy_page_iterator` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6ef599b3dc4f1b639d3197c028e40b71","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitlab_import/client.rb","lines":{"begin":59,"end":76}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `merge_hash_tree` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e6ac0be8cece82ccc2e82ff8dd59e20e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/utils/merge_hash.rb","lines":{"begin":58,"end":97}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `listing` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7b99984bc28e1e4cbc4903a72d7ac663","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/hashed_storage/rake_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":72,"end":87}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `ee_compat_check.rb` has 312 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2103307f841e293ce32cd4161da95965","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ee_compat_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":440}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2092800,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `generate_patch` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d35820a437b86e532f50e32d127b5ab0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ee_compat_check.rb","lines":{"begin":115,"end":130}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `check_patch` has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2b66236ad0f63db5144a0820b94228b9","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ee_compat_check.rb","lines":{"begin":178,"end":211}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `EeCompatCheck` has 33 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"36de6fe216cdb6efd396cb08cb43cee5","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ee_compat_check.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":439}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2500000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `ce_branch_doesnt_apply_cleanly_and_no_ee_branch_msg` has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e819c9434d1b44e764eb37a75eb1f24c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ee_compat_check.rb","lines":{"begin":336,"end":412}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1080000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `scrub` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7d4324ffa269ec245847b9dd62388202","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":33}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `<=>` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"07c5403aa1fb1c5999cd6138fc8be4c8","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/version_info.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":40}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform_substitutions` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d72ee6aae32c9c1901f52bf269676a8b","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/quick_actions/extractor.rb","lines":{"begin":115,"end":134}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `commands_regex` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1bf5c2a5cbd5a2d9489e4fefc15a284e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/quick_actions/extractor.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":113}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `to_h` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a75d7faca54c18a6777848a3850d38cc","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/quick_actions/command_definition.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":66}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `wait` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bf93e6de620ccd0324ee0deae40e9661","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/job_waiter.rb","lines":{"begin":44,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_number_of_plurals` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ca29b997f9707951ab1c16832eac75dd","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/i18n/po_linter.rb","lines":{"begin":86,"end":94}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `fill_in_variables` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7baf89f0f9dd60c092411c5d3c85f5c4","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/i18n/po_linter.rb","lines":{"begin":222,"end":236}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `PoLinter` has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"befcb8a3c9cdc94613a938be76c2abf4","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/i18n/po_linter.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":276}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1400000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `missing_members?` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a92dd0b78adf6408e1bb1362dfd52ac0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/create_fork_network_memberships_range.rb","lines":{"begin":48,"end":78}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `migrate_stage_index_sql` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"17594a98741c619d81f5982d56852229","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/migrate_stage_index.rb","lines":{"begin":15,"end":44}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `remove_restricted_features_todos` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2f6311086002a50283e8edb15d2db097","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/remove_restricted_todos.rb","lines":{"begin":80,"end":94}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `perform` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3b81cbbe6df91a033cc8895bc63aa0e7","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/copy_column.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":17}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `each_pair` has a Cognitive Complexity of 43 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d8eeaa32395230adf97a240f222c4203","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/normalize_ldap_extern_uids_range.rb","lines":{"begin":53,"end":189}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `initialize_array` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7098a1e02746bd3280879e695e913e37","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/normalize_ldap_extern_uids_range.rb","lines":{"begin":262,"end":276}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bb5327ee9231b73596539ad7b2c167fa","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/normalize_ldap_extern_uids_range.rb","lines":{"begin":300,"end":314}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `each_pair` has 131 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d03740b18e02c4d6c12a846688367eb2","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/normalize_ldap_extern_uids_range.rb","lines":{"begin":53,"end":189}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3144000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `single_diff_rows` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8c44e90db62947f73461b513d8b2bf71","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/deserialize_merge_request_diffs_and_commits.rb","lines":{"begin":86,"end":129}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `single_diff_rows` has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bc4293178ed4b9812cc3752d52c4c2ae","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/deserialize_merge_request_diffs_and_commits.rb","lines":{"begin":86,"end":129}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":768000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `median` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8131f9850b467befa49f83c8893e074e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/cycle_analytics/base_stage.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":46}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `first_time_reference_commit` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"57863573b761b600f6f37177c4bdcc2c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/cycle_analytics/plan_event_fetcher.rb","lines":{"begin":40,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `groups` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bb94f91ea8ea9bfebe88077bde7c9c70","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/blame.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":34}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `issuable_meta_data` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a722790729116e77942fe04c5ea5c2fe","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/issuable_metadata.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":42}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `issuable_meta_data` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"654ad0544dd20bd2a0fa2b2222724814","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/issuable_metadata.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":42}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_id_by_path` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"249edd9d3a49a4634c75d7f66eddf0d3","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/tree.rb","lines":{"begin":36,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `get_submodules_by_name` has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1779cdd505003a594a0ec1e401b49750","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/gitmodules_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":66}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `merge` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"14d8d23268624da10eee3aa315d71171","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":552,"end":552}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `find_commits_by_message` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"03db09f73721e8dc853a0e8d5c5b586a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":948,"end":948}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `repository.rb` has 724 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4fd0011d1b240dc0bd3776dada53d992","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":1045}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":8025600,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `refs_hash` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1b3b8f358aa6754b1127fcaf1fc63eab","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":461,"end":473}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `process_count_commits_options` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d7dfc3dabbbd3403a850821e31ef9869","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":987,"end":1005}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Repository` has 117 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7e5d4a5ee3414c57e7d1ae875324fab4","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":1043}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":10900000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `resolve_lines` has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2a9fd4db8c8cf162f378aa963d6765b0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/conflict/file.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":86}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `parse` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"244c77bd66325eb47245517103368219","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/conflict/parser.rb","lines":{"begin":15,"end":70}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `parse` has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bf9628db17f21b3c6afe90328a37f6d0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/conflict/parser.rb","lines":{"begin":15,"end":70}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1056000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8c678916b00a357376bbd89e7d450a28","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/blob.rb","lines":{"begin":24,"end":50}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `parse_attributes` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4edbf1e31d321135c7006513a4035f15","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/attributes_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":41,"end":77}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `parse_data` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"19a8edffd98f8988b199c80f6919a68a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/attributes_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":91,"end":108}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `update_page` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cc6e53b3d35661118499e22b31c33048","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/wiki.rb","lines":{"begin":41,"end":41}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `gitaly_update_page` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"29ae202c7d73dff34ed176c4c489e03c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/wiki.rb","lines":{"begin":139,"end":139}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Wiki` has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"16108ddc899f6bed5535bed2d4dbd403","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/wiki.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":166}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1700000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `initialize` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"992ce430fa1cfa75fffb04b791835530","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/compare.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":22}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `commit.rb` has 261 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b0e8a3e8bec1d1e4d61a4ca6961eee37","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":421}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1358400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d2501d4f37da4c3f3bfc13d8ddefb8b1","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":52,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Commit` has 48 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5c05f17b105a544fbb7b1e653e4e9622","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":419}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":4000000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `each_serialized_patch` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"489c6b7588d70b32aa203aa6c41632df","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/diff_collection.rb","lines":{"begin":120,"end":152}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `between` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4c22ec0e0d894fff0c7dd7383e7e90f2","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/diff.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `process_raw_blame` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c5cb9f5c58bb1d9925a29d6754967c20","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/blame.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `in_lock` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"68b34982cd05d58d79738b15c96f20f7","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/exclusive_lease_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":27}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `run_check` has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d86f72edc80623f2c31df045a73c54a3","location":{"path":"lib/system_check/simple_executor.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":82}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `run_check` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"32ee25468fc9ba9255e373bf8565a409","location":{"path":"lib/system_check/simple_executor.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":82}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `dump` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"90c4b195bc0f9e6e440c936a49f66db4","location":{"path":"lib/backup/database.rb","lines":{"begin":14,"end":48}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `dump` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e224fd061ebe87897322d771a18ed4f9","location":{"path":"lib/backup/database.rb","lines":{"begin":14,"end":48}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `dump` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7e1d28a077c128dd08f453c105fdd9df","location":{"path":"lib/backup/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":11,"end":39}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `restore` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8c618e2d28195eb4c364400e1b377f3f","location":{"path":"lib/backup/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":119}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `restore` has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dce1e21850a52796bdc54dd0352fef39","location":{"path":"lib/backup/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":119}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":912000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `cleanup` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"df1565e2084a026c19a57df20f8c1dab","location":{"path":"lib/backup/manager.rb","lines":{"begin":59,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `remove_old` has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"25cd2cf6fbb64afd366f3be6ab9d89fd","location":{"path":"lib/backup/manager.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":107}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `unpack` has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"67d7ec9e6873944629ee60ae0c82b98f","location":{"path":"lib/backup/manager.rb","lines":{"begin":110,"end":161}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Manager` has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c011f3bde58a57c5c1b310f99fdde1e8","location":{"path":"lib/backup/manager.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":247}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `unpack` has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0f4697ee5870ab55f0f0482a90f0aafe","location":{"path":"lib/backup/manager.rb","lines":{"begin":110,"end":161}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":984000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `decoded` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9d399e9cd55ad1c8999c18172266e16d","location":{"path":"lib/omni_auth/strategies/jwt.rb","lines":{"begin":37,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `class_for_class` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"44146c776b1d2705ab1e91d14f931ca6","location":{"path":"lib/declarative_policy.rb","lines":{"begin":62,"end":74}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `compute_class_for_class` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"504ef7ee6e8fa9917bb219a3ce5a6531","location":{"path":"lib/declarative_policy.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":93}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/dn.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":298}},"remediation_points":14090000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/normalize_ldap_extern_uids_range.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":293}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 722**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1672855f6e5f2e5e61f5f47620f50c44","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/normalize_ldap_extern_uids_range.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":293}},"remediation_points":14090000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/dn.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":298}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 722**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"08b04488cb6c1d433518d22f9fd7ac22","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":20}},"remediation_points":1270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":38}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":45}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":65,"end":65}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":73,"end":73}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":96,"end":96}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d3612d232382cae9828e7733da5a69ff","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":38}},"remediation_points":1270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":20}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":45}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":65,"end":65}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":73,"end":73}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":96,"end":96}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d3612d232382cae9828e7733da5a69ff","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":45}},"remediation_points":1270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":20}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":38}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":65,"end":65}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":73,"end":73}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":96,"end":96}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d3612d232382cae9828e7733da5a69ff","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":65,"end":65}},"remediation_points":1270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":20}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":38}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":45}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":73,"end":73}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":96,"end":96}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d3612d232382cae9828e7733da5a69ff","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":73,"end":73}},"remediation_points":1270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":20}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":38}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":45}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":65,"end":65}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":96,"end":96}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d3612d232382cae9828e7733da5a69ff","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":96,"end":96}},"remediation_points":1270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":20}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":38}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":45}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":65,"end":65}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":73,"end":73}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d3612d232382cae9828e7733da5a69ff","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":47}},"remediation_points":1170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":61,"end":61}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":64}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":74}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":81,"end":81}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 76**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9d3f720528b273e90fa0c600a4007367","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":61,"end":61}},"remediation_points":1170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":47}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":64}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":74}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":81,"end":81}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 76**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9d3f720528b273e90fa0c600a4007367","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":64}},"remediation_points":1170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":47}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":61,"end":61}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":74}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":81,"end":81}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 76**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9d3f720528b273e90fa0c600a4007367","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":74}},"remediation_points":1170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":47}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":61,"end":61}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":64}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":81,"end":81}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 76**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9d3f720528b273e90fa0c600a4007367","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":81,"end":81}},"remediation_points":1170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":47}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":61,"end":61}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":64}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":74}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 76**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9d3f720528b273e90fa0c600a4007367","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":87,"end":87}},"remediation_points":1290000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":88,"end":88}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 82**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3bfe7daee55e5a8099dd7a73db3a63a6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":88,"end":88}},"remediation_points":1290000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":87,"end":87}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 82**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3bfe7daee55e5a8099dd7a73db3a63a6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":41,"end":41}},"remediation_points":1130000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":42,"end":42}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":58,"end":58}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":59,"end":59}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 74**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8f8e7cbf1a02ae8fa5ae5397530797b7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":42,"end":42}},"remediation_points":1130000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":41,"end":41}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":58,"end":58}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":59,"end":59}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 74**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8f8e7cbf1a02ae8fa5ae5397530797b7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":58,"end":58}},"remediation_points":1130000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":41,"end":41}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":42,"end":42}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":59,"end":59}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 74**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8f8e7cbf1a02ae8fa5ae5397530797b7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":59,"end":59}},"remediation_points":1130000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":41,"end":41}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":42,"end":42}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":58,"end":58}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 74**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8f8e7cbf1a02ae8fa5ae5397530797b7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":30}},"remediation_points":1610000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":31}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":95,"end":95}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 98**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"22a2073b162b635650c424f759625ae1","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":31}},"remediation_points":1610000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":30}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":95,"end":95}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 98**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"22a2073b162b635650c424f759625ae1","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":95,"end":95}},"remediation_points":1610000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":30}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":31}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 98**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"22a2073b162b635650c424f759625ae1","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/clusters/platforms/kubernetes.rb","lines":{"begin":65,"end":78}},"remediation_points":930000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/project_services/kubernetes_service.rb","lines":{"begin":107,"end":120}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"4b2ec9ed4e92599e6bbba9a4a97ebeb0","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/kubernetes_service.rb","lines":{"begin":107,"end":120}},"remediation_points":930000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/clusters/platforms/kubernetes.rb","lines":{"begin":65,"end":78}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0c7ce0e1a2c6b9abe1956a85bf8e6e52","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":40,"end":40}},"remediation_points":1350000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":72,"end":72}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":78}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 85**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2f55aade2bccc69344fa093ec61a30db","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":72,"end":72}},"remediation_points":1350000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":40,"end":40}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":78}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 85**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2f55aade2bccc69344fa093ec61a30db","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":78}},"remediation_points":1350000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":40,"end":40}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":72,"end":72}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 85**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2f55aade2bccc69344fa093ec61a30db","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":75,"end":75}},"remediation_points":1230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":79,"end":79}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":97,"end":97}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 79**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9473b40c2cb0f7afc9308169cf2dced6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":79,"end":79}},"remediation_points":1230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":75,"end":75}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":97,"end":97}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 79**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9473b40c2cb0f7afc9308169cf2dced6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":97,"end":97}},"remediation_points":1230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":75,"end":75}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":79,"end":79}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 79**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9473b40c2cb0f7afc9308169cf2dced6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":35,"end":35}},"remediation_points":1090000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":43,"end":43}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":63}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 72**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6149a95705035fa65fb27a491aa16e7d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":43,"end":43}},"remediation_points":1090000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":35,"end":35}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":63}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 72**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6149a95705035fa65fb27a491aa16e7d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":63}},"remediation_points":1090000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":35,"end":35}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":43,"end":43}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 72**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6149a95705035fa65fb27a491aa16e7d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":49}},"remediation_points":1070000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":56,"end":56}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":83,"end":83}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 71**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"123ff3d56c152101a1c911f1a95326be","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":56,"end":56}},"remediation_points":1070000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":49}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":83,"end":83}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 71**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"123ff3d56c152101a1c911f1a95326be","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":83,"end":83}},"remediation_points":1070000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":49}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":56,"end":56}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 71**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"123ff3d56c152101a1c911f1a95326be","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":198,"end":227}},"remediation_points":570000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":270,"end":299}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 46**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"672d4e588f6155fa74bf7ca34fedabb2","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":270,"end":299}},"remediation_points":570000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":198,"end":227}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 46**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"672d4e588f6155fa74bf7ca34fedabb2","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":101,"end":101}},"remediation_points":1490000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":103,"end":103}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 92**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"633c7fa21c24339ba725403293231a75","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":103,"end":103}},"remediation_points":1490000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":101,"end":101}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 92**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"633c7fa21c24339ba725403293231a75","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":90,"end":90}},"remediation_points":1390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":102,"end":102}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 87**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"925e4b3663b9cd9937ee7db7f882dfbc","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":102,"end":102}},"remediation_points":1390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":90,"end":90}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 87**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"925e4b3663b9cd9937ee7db7f882dfbc","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":55,"end":55}},"remediation_points":1250000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":89,"end":89}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 80**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b931145ce6d6777daae248a043f04d6d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":89,"end":89}},"remediation_points":1250000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":55,"end":55}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 80**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b931145ce6d6777daae248a043f04d6d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/bitbucket/collection.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":18}},"remediation_points":410000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/bitbucket_server/collection.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":20}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 38**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9daf3a24f43b64dd40b3841c26c29df5","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/bitbucket_server/collection.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":20}},"remediation_points":410000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/bitbucket/collection.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":18}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 38**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ebc02a5c26ee206388b48b53d93e24a1","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":40,"end":89}},"remediation_points":1150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":91,"end":140}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 75**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6778d05c8ddc9f6653765ac7ae623751","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":91,"end":140}},"remediation_points":1150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":40,"end":89}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 75**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6778d05c8ddc9f6653765ac7ae623751","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/tag.rb","lines":{"begin":14,"end":24}},"remediation_points":650000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":159,"end":169}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":179,"end":189}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d27c41bdaed8bbbc1c91788baad098b2","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":159,"end":169}},"remediation_points":650000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":179,"end":189}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/tag.rb","lines":{"begin":14,"end":24}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e87685897f699d56f0c9bba98c92c792","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":179,"end":189}},"remediation_points":650000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":159,"end":169}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/tag.rb","lines":{"begin":14,"end":24}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e87685897f699d56f0c9bba98c92c792","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":46,"end":46}},"remediation_points":1150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":80,"end":80}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 75**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"482f209ad35861d8a59e5e60275568d2","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":80,"end":80}},"remediation_points":1150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":46,"end":46}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 75**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"482f209ad35861d8a59e5e60275568d2","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"qa/spec/git/location_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":24}},"remediation_points":1130000,"other_locations":[{"path":"qa/spec/git/location_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":29,"end":50}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 74**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"dd9851dda741bf04f8f991425e6b4fa8","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"qa/spec/git/location_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":29,"end":50}},"remediation_points":1130000,"other_locations":[{"path":"qa/spec/git/location_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":24}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 74**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"dd9851dda741bf04f8f991425e6b4fa8","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":54,"end":54}},"remediation_points":1110000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":66}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 73**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"62cf424fda0f778b3dcc5914fc2096b6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":66}},"remediation_points":1110000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":54,"end":54}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 73**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"62cf424fda0f778b3dcc5914fc2096b6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/system_hooks.rb","lines":{"begin":24,"end":31}},"remediation_points":550000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/broadcast_messages.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":73}},{"path":"lib/api/pipeline_schedules.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":73}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"dc8d377ac78b1e411b24adff2bb25ac8","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/broadcast_messages.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":73}},"remediation_points":550000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/pipeline_schedules.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":73}},{"path":"lib/api/system_hooks.rb","lines":{"begin":24,"end":31}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d6ed9adeccc2432c442bb7e3b2de77ca","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/pipeline_schedules.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":73}},"remediation_points":550000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/broadcast_messages.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":73}},{"path":"lib/api/system_hooks.rb","lines":{"begin":24,"end":31}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e53239021b533bc772fd7c38fd9fbf32","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/http_io.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":99}},"remediation_points":930000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace/chunked_io.rb","lines":{"begin":69,"end":92}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"06b83fddd1854f4cbb5ee692f2b3c479","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace/chunked_io.rb","lines":{"begin":69,"end":92}},"remediation_points":930000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/http_io.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":99}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"fa155c048bfa229583a4b14cba8ef368","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/commits_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":49}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/controllers/projects/compare_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":58}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"25a210eb00ee75fb3a27aef364105444","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/compare_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":58}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/controllers/projects/commits_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":49}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3331c85dad0745b1770318b847052656","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/clusters/platforms/kubernetes.rb","lines":{"begin":87,"end":91}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/project_services/kubernetes_service.rb","lines":{"begin":129,"end":133}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"a485030c77dac9d4720e17783248f6f2","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/kubernetes_service.rb","lines":{"begin":129,"end":133}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/clusters/platforms/kubernetes.rb","lines":{"begin":87,"end":91}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"70c3aa57163e28d9e2b8cf58b891e37a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/clusters/platforms/kubernetes.rb","lines":{"begin":153,"end":161}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/project_services/kubernetes_service.rb","lines":{"begin":209,"end":217}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c29d81ebf7e5c4008896a514ac05cd90","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/kubernetes_service.rb","lines":{"begin":209,"end":217}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/clusters/platforms/kubernetes.rb","lines":{"begin":153,"end":161}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"562f28dc8f9527c3acb9451bb9905421","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/code_reuse/presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":36}},"remediation_points":770000,"other_locations":[{"path":"rubocop/cop/code_reuse/serializer.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":36}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 56**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ee8707c802bad394fc157d1bd785ea38","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/code_reuse/serializer.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":36}},"remediation_points":770000,"other_locations":[{"path":"rubocop/cop/code_reuse/presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":36}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 56**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"999d054331f9bf60e9fac34f362dfa33","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/commit_service.rb","lines":{"begin":363,"end":376}},"remediation_points":730000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":217,"end":230}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 54**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6d5fdcb9f4e92bdc8de77ce0d327e38d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":217,"end":230}},"remediation_points":730000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/commit_service.rb","lines":{"begin":363,"end":376}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 54**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b9094b2f402bdf758fbd32cced243c48","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/clusters/platforms/kubernetes.rb","lines":{"begin":143,"end":151}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/project_services/kubernetes_service.rb","lines":{"begin":199,"end":207}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9cdba14c6ea64993cb19a2d65e8cf92c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/kubernetes_service.rb","lines":{"begin":199,"end":207}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/clusters/platforms/kubernetes.rb","lines":{"begin":143,"end":151}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"a53ce766f9ff3869e29a216c2dd49425","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":37,"end":46}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":50,"end":59}},{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":72}},{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":85}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7de6970da5143bb219d1d73c65245a18","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":50,"end":59}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":37,"end":46}},{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":72}},{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":85}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7de6970da5143bb219d1d73c65245a18","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":72}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":37,"end":46}},{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":50,"end":59}},{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":85}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7de6970da5143bb219d1d73c65245a18","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":85}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":37,"end":46}},{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":50,"end":59}},{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":72}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7de6970da5143bb219d1d73c65245a18","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/serializers/note_entity.rb","lines":{"begin":67,"end":68}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/serializers/project_note_entity.rb","lines":{"begin":20,"end":21}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3177b0cd54cd809575f1d61e0a65ac25","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/serializers/project_note_entity.rb","lines":{"begin":20,"end":21}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/serializers/note_entity.rb","lines":{"begin":67,"end":68}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"bc28db1513fbf8f22f0e63c12ccb87bb","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/project_hooks.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":69}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/project_hooks.rb","lines":{"begin":88,"end":91}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"cd274943b0a85d56266ca30e0dc9e6ce","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/project_hooks.rb","lines":{"begin":88,"end":91}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/project_hooks.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":69}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"cd274943b0a85d56266ca30e0dc9e6ce","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/settings.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":83}},"remediation_points":650000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":86,"end":93}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ad9527e40decd629ae978623c4e6dbb3","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":86,"end":93}},"remediation_points":650000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/settings.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":83}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5a97fc139bd16e6c2c1ebb387c258035","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/commits.rb","lines":{"begin":28,"end":36}},"remediation_points":590000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":182,"end":190}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 47**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"4a0f4dd71fe015ff3e29d7ce0c5f5aa0","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":182,"end":190}},"remediation_points":590000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/commits.rb","lines":{"begin":28,"end":36}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 47**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"656c922dc9f4dab2a9d07fc10e49f190","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/health_checks/redis/queues_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/health_checks/redis/cache_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/health_checks/redis/shared_state_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"a52f4db116344fb82ae762dfb265af18","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/health_checks/redis/cache_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/health_checks/redis/queues_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/health_checks/redis/shared_state_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"31c92fe357e3684090c3440aef2d0b29","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/health_checks/redis/shared_state_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/health_checks/redis/cache_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/health_checks/redis/queues_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"fed5fac4efc814d8bd6d479976af387a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":199,"end":206}},"remediation_points":250000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":209,"end":216}},{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":219,"end":226}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 30**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9bdbae2675861886dd810a67f252ae76","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":209,"end":216}},"remediation_points":250000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":199,"end":206}},{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":219,"end":226}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 30**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9bdbae2675861886dd810a67f252ae76","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":219,"end":226}},"remediation_points":250000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":199,"end":206}},{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":209,"end":216}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 30**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9bdbae2675861886dd810a67f252ae76","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/policies/project_policy.rb","lines":{"begin":217,"end":236}},"remediation_points":510000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/policies/project_policy.rb","lines":{"begin":330,"end":351}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 43**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6f53dee2e0dbe6e42301dfabd181bed2","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/policies/project_policy.rb","lines":{"begin":330,"end":351}},"remediation_points":510000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/policies/project_policy.rb","lines":{"begin":217,"end":236}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 43**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6f53dee2e0dbe6e42301dfabd181bed2","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":22}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":250,"end":267}},{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":322,"end":339}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"14eeea8dcc69e4efb8f98042eb7ee62c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":250,"end":267}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":22}},{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":322,"end":339}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"14eeea8dcc69e4efb8f98042eb7ee62c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":322,"end":339}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":22}},{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":250,"end":267}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"14eeea8dcc69e4efb8f98042eb7ee62c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":230,"end":247}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":302,"end":319}},{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":511,"end":528}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"14eeea8dcc69e4efb8f98042eb7ee62c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":302,"end":319}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":230,"end":247}},{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":511,"end":528}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"14eeea8dcc69e4efb8f98042eb7ee62c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":511,"end":528}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":230,"end":247}},{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":302,"end":319}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"14eeea8dcc69e4efb8f98042eb7ee62c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/http_io.rb","lines":{"begin":102,"end":119}},"remediation_points":490000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace/chunked_io.rb","lines":{"begin":95,"end":112}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 42**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9fcdc086aaa42b293828e5799976b36c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace/chunked_io.rb","lines":{"begin":95,"end":112}},"remediation_points":490000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/http_io.rb","lines":{"begin":102,"end":119}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 42**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0aa489542536e966d0d4ee9d92b86de3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/policies/project_policy.rb","lines":{"begin":152,"end":170}},"remediation_points":470000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/policies/project_policy.rb","lines":{"begin":177,"end":195}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 41**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3960d89aa99311987411af9a2ce4316a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/policies/project_policy.rb","lines":{"begin":177,"end":195}},"remediation_points":470000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/policies/project_policy.rb","lines":{"begin":152,"end":170}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 41**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3960d89aa99311987411af9a2ce4316a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/tags.rb","lines":{"begin":95,"end":104}},"remediation_points":470000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/tags.rb","lines":{"begin":115,"end":124}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 41**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"04627bf7d430fe80b4f7d86af94fb085","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/tags.rb","lines":{"begin":115,"end":124}},"remediation_points":470000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/tags.rb","lines":{"begin":95,"end":104}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 41**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"04627bf7d430fe80b4f7d86af94fb085","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/issues.rb","lines":{"begin":159,"end":171}},"remediation_points":450000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/commit_statuses.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":23}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 40**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"72cad3326805b4987fbe6343ebb3d0fd","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/commit_statuses.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":23}},"remediation_points":450000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/issues.rb","lines":{"begin":159,"end":171}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 40**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"69ab1e3ccd645591451e705830d55186","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/discussions.rb","lines":{"begin":159,"end":163}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/discussions.rb","lines":{"begin":194,"end":198}},{"path":"lib/api/discussions.rb","lines":{"begin":209,"end":213}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"94185a2a13c6fd98f5095f170db11d97","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/discussions.rb","lines":{"begin":194,"end":198}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/discussions.rb","lines":{"begin":159,"end":163}},{"path":"lib/api/discussions.rb","lines":{"begin":209,"end":213}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"94185a2a13c6fd98f5095f170db11d97","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/discussions.rb","lines":{"begin":209,"end":213}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/discussions.rb","lines":{"begin":159,"end":163}},{"path":"lib/api/discussions.rb","lines":{"begin":194,"end":198}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"94185a2a13c6fd98f5095f170db11d97","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/timestamps.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":22}},"remediation_points":430000,"other_locations":[{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/remove_index.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":21}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 39**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c7a34cb081b464faf300442c9a9c35d6","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/remove_index.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":21}},"remediation_points":430000,"other_locations":[{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/timestamps.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":22}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 39**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1c3d38d7fee5df958c3e432d1dd17b38","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":265,"end":272}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":330,"end":337}},{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":417,"end":423}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b090709c230c91d97c8733ac43a69eb2","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":330,"end":337}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":265,"end":272}},{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":417,"end":423}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b090709c230c91d97c8733ac43a69eb2","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":417,"end":423}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":265,"end":272}},{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":330,"end":337}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b090709c230c91d97c8733ac43a69eb2","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":172,"end":195}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":645,"end":668}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 37**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ef781c60f85295b7fcab51d2c5fa6dbf","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":645,"end":668}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":172,"end":195}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 37**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ef781c60f85295b7fcab51d2c5fa6dbf","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":469,"end":492}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":599,"end":622}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 37**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ef781c60f85295b7fcab51d2c5fa6dbf","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":599,"end":622}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":469,"end":492}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 37**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ef781c60f85295b7fcab51d2c5fa6dbf","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/variables.rb","lines":{"begin":70,"end":80}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/group_variables.rb","lines":{"begin":70,"end":80}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 37**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b710502de22d6ac75887584b4089f55d","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/group_variables.rb","lines":{"begin":70,"end":80}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/variables.rb","lines":{"begin":70,"end":80}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 37**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5ed54d7e9dec3ef5264c44b21ab42f3b","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/relative_positioning.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":75}},"remediation_points":370000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/concerns/relative_positioning.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":90}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 36**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6a6be26fc5b134ababae60c5b17185e7","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/relative_positioning.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":90}},"remediation_points":370000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/concerns/relative_positioning.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":75}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 36**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6a6be26fc5b134ababae60c5b17185e7","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":241,"end":252}},"remediation_points":370000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":305,"end":316}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 36**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b03582b4029701d34f64ca56f039ff3c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":305,"end":316}},"remediation_points":370000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":241,"end":252}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 36**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b03582b4029701d34f64ca56f039ff3c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":615,"end":622}},"remediation_points":370000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":706,"end":713}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 36**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6613d45047514c566568cdc6b20a1433","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":706,"end":713}},"remediation_points":370000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":615,"end":622}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 36**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6613d45047514c566568cdc6b20a1433","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/user_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":34,"end":47}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/project_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":43}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 34**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e03c415d22f94144c8a11a51bf75449a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/project_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":43}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/user_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":34,"end":47}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 34**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8a3a69b8619d932aa827e537f3525e47","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/cycle_analytics/code_stage.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/cycle_analytics/review_stage.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 34**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9c27f17bb5883c88a2dcf096a1e3eb10","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/cycle_analytics/review_stage.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/cycle_analytics/code_stage.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 34**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1a85a78111fd009c906af5e3e2e5c1b3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/teamcity_service.rb","lines":{"begin":52,"end":61}},"remediation_points":310000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/project_services/bamboo_service.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":58}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 33**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"043f75067c16ff3e5d772bc2d1ae6742","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/bamboo_service.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":58}},"remediation_points":310000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/project_services/teamcity_service.rb","lines":{"begin":52,"end":61}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 33**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3bc437123bd781d63ac2e5f1e2ee6eb3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/set_confidential_note_events_on_webhooks.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":22}},"remediation_points":310000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/set_confidential_note_events_on_services.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":22}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 33**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3ed85e9f30996e6d2ccc2e0700c1902e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/set_confidential_note_events_on_services.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":22}},"remediation_points":310000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/set_confidential_note_events_on_webhooks.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":22}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 33**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7ea2c375fc2078d33f6958933228ed7c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/backup/database.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":27}},"remediation_points":290000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/backup/database.rb","lines":{"begin":57,"end":61}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 32**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"eb17727d02a7c074c3154590d6ac3890","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/backup/database.rb","lines":{"begin":57,"end":61}},"remediation_points":290000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/backup/database.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":27}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 32**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"eb17727d02a7c074c3154590d6ac3890","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/user_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":130,"end":135}},"remediation_points":290000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/user_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":138,"end":143}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 32**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c728f05ae3efb5098c029de0b3280f52","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/user_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":138,"end":143}},"remediation_points":290000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/user_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":130,"end":135}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 32**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c728f05ae3efb5098c029de0b3280f52","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/updated_at_filterable.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":11}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/concerns/created_at_filterable.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":11}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"cf343522a426e7b5b70965cafd123e2d","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/created_at_filterable.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":11}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/concerns/updated_at_filterable.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":11}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"83ce9e73df4d8e3e8128ba7268e47c86","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":1183,"end":1185}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":1189,"end":1191}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5c5665e3faea9b14f82119a1c414984d","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":1189,"end":1191}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":1183,"end":1185}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5c5665e3faea9b14f82119a1c414984d","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/legacy_github_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":90,"end":96}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/legacy_github_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":105,"end":111}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"fb529d437944a41ecb389c07d4f4b95c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/legacy_github_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":105,"end":111}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/legacy_github_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":90,"end":96}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"fb529d437944a41ecb389c07d4f4b95c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/system_check/app/tmp_writable_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":24}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/system_check/app/log_writable_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":24}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5873e0223d34261535ea9380a655f530","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/system_check/app/log_writable_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":24}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/system_check/app/tmp_writable_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":24}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f5f6516f48de36202ed1fb08b864850e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/services/search_service.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":20}},"remediation_points":250000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/services/search_service.rb","lines":{"begin":26,"end":34}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 30**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"71865084b25bec6d7d5ead8d752fb091","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/services/search_service.rb","lines":{"begin":26,"end":34}},"remediation_points":250000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/services/search_service.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":20}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 30**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"71865084b25bec6d7d5ead8d752fb091","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":192,"end":201}},"remediation_points":250000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":205,"end":214}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 30**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"87efcabb3c142197252756a6564676fa","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":205,"end":214}},"remediation_points":250000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":192,"end":201}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 30**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"87efcabb3c142197252756a6564676fa","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"qa/qa/specs/features/browser_ui/1_manage/login/log_in_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":12}},"remediation_points":250000,"other_locations":[{"path":"qa/qa/specs/features/browser_ui/1_manage/login/log_into_gitlab_via_ldap_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":14}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 30**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0022a6eabe051cdbca1e39ad3d0616a0","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"qa/qa/specs/features/browser_ui/1_manage/login/log_into_gitlab_via_ldap_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":14}},"remediation_points":250000,"other_locations":[{"path":"qa/qa/specs/features/browser_ui/1_manage/login/log_in_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":12}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 30**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b769bd2ad86996248bc0cb9e9909ad48","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/controllers/admin/impersonation_tokens_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":30}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/controllers/profiles/personal_access_tokens_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":28}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d66178654f9f4136765d0ea5d8b3e694","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/controllers/profiles/personal_access_tokens_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":28}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/controllers/admin/impersonation_tokens_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":30}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7450a990959a14aea730f2b6be2c03b2","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/clusters_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":72,"end":85}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/controllers/projects/clusters_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":88,"end":101}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9983d989b521b3d7814b329e7276929a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/clusters_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":88,"end":101}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/controllers/projects/clusters_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":72,"end":85}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9983d989b521b3d7814b329e7276929a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/blob_viewer/podspec.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":26}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/blob_viewer/gemspec.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":26}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"bff03fdced6cbae88ff2946f20dc10e3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/blob_viewer/gemspec.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":26}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/blob_viewer/podspec.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":26}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"51fdccc6768efcdd38f19730ffe72a7c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/ci/stage.rb","lines":{"begin":96,"end":103}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/ci/pipeline.rb","lines":{"begin":442,"end":449}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"25c1e443e5b07fc0b45f399a084137f7","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/ci/pipeline.rb","lines":{"begin":442,"end":449}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/ci/stage.rb","lines":{"begin":96,"end":103}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"577c618e98095b86078d36b2ac019b73","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/settings.rb","lines":{"begin":59,"end":63}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/tags.rb","lines":{"begin":46,"end":50}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"34d52e18accbf89e1d40ad4efe71140e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/tags.rb","lines":{"begin":46,"end":50}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/settings.rb","lines":{"begin":59,"end":63}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7249b946ecaa77a923de68a038829979","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/finders/group_members_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":22}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/finders/group_members_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":26,"end":30}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b855af99fe41d98222cc7d488606c72e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/finders/group_members_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":26,"end":30}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/finders/group_members_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":22}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b855af99fe41d98222cc7d488606c72e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/members.rb","lines":{"begin":132,"end":137}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/access_requests.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":81}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"74eeab655880b068d73bfa1508e15e08","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/access_requests.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":81}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/members.rb","lines":{"begin":132,"end":137}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"89dd703acaf685f87aef279f54d3c31a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database.rb","lines":{"begin":98,"end":109}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/database.rb","lines":{"begin":112,"end":123}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2b8f3ea2a51c54532c43041c348ab5c3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database.rb","lines":{"begin":112,"end":123}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/database.rb","lines":{"begin":98,"end":109}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2b8f3ea2a51c54532c43041c348ab5c3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":44,"end":47}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":50,"end":53}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e02e496b4b6107134a36720421ac55a9","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":50,"end":53}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":44,"end":47}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e02e496b4b6107134a36720421ac55a9","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"qa/spec/runtime/env_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":14}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"qa/spec/runtime/env_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":25}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d4456b6f43cef6bfbf9b6d039f749cdc","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"qa/spec/runtime/env_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":25}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"qa/spec/runtime/env_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":14}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d4456b6f43cef6bfbf9b6d039f749cdc","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":252,"end":262}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":280,"end":290}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d67c2bf9c225577fade90666e5dfc6e3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":280,"end":290}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":252,"end":262}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d67c2bf9c225577fade90666e5dfc6e3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":396,"end":405}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":410,"end":419}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d67c2bf9c225577fade90666e5dfc6e3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":410,"end":419}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":396,"end":405}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d67c2bf9c225577fade90666e5dfc6e3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/migrate_legacy_artifacts.rb","lines":{"begin":24,"end":61}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/migrate_legacy_artifacts.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":104}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f75f6fbbc7064f4fdca08c087adf39c3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/migrate_legacy_artifacts.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":104}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/migrate_legacy_artifacts.rb","lines":{"begin":24,"end":61}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f75f6fbbc7064f4fdca08c087adf39c3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/checks/change_access.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":17}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/git_access.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":25}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ef81133143dac9759b71c4ff2fbf45ed","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git_access.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":25}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/checks/change_access.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":17}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"26fd0da9b8c1ef08c93581298c4ae63a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":564,"end":575}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":579,"end":590}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7853b1dd44bd6645b11dfd03b93082d6","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":579,"end":590}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":564,"end":575}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7853b1dd44bd6645b11dfd03b93082d6","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/google_code_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":211,"end":225}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/fogbugz_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":204,"end":210}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"85278ceed072f59d95f4d59bb38349cd","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/fogbugz_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":204,"end":210}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/google_code_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":211,"end":225}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"84267e4195b1ef161585bb368ab56cb4","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/mailers/emails/profile.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":20}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/mailers/emails/profile.rb","lines":{"begin":25,"end":32}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"08b3c569353eb654d48c0f3d5dfd5507","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/mailers/emails/profile.rb","lines":{"begin":25,"end":32}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/mailers/emails/profile.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":20}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"08b3c569353eb654d48c0f3d5dfd5507","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/prometheus_metric.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":43}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/helpers/preferences_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":22}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"84368938cf4e38b28be7f2494ab7dded","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/helpers/preferences_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":22}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/prometheus_metric.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":43}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"60bfb34cb2ceca3dea92da73de2720d1","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":826,"end":838}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":842,"end":854}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f850bbad5c6c0dbf53dcda181b0fe2ef","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":842,"end":854}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":826,"end":838}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f850bbad5c6c0dbf53dcda181b0fe2ef","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":1195,"end":1197}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":1201,"end":1203}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"79536c6f949eba9317227c4e88951f1f","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":1201,"end":1203}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":1195,"end":1197}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"79536c6f949eba9317227c4e88951f1f","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/presenters/project_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":233,"end":242}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/presenters/project_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":263,"end":272}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c2d74780d6448543b93af9ac07770eb6","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/presenters/project_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":263,"end":272}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/presenters/project_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":233,"end":242}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c2d74780d6448543b93af9ac07770eb6","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/services/protected_branches/legacy_api_update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":22}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/services/protected_branches/legacy_api_update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":25,"end":29}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2a21c2dc3f646e0e31fff25ee48b9b44","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/services/protected_branches/legacy_api_update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":25,"end":29}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/services/protected_branches/legacy_api_update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":22}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2a21c2dc3f646e0e31fff25ee48b9b44","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/services/quick_actions/interpret_service.rb","lines":{"begin":222,"end":229}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/services/quick_actions/interpret_service.rb","lines":{"begin":276,"end":283}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c5f1ca2a225a96cfa3b4fc88b12b03b0","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/services/quick_actions/interpret_service.rb","lines":{"begin":276,"end":283}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/services/quick_actions/interpret_service.rb","lines":{"begin":222,"end":229}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c5f1ca2a225a96cfa3b4fc88b12b03b0","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/branches.rb","lines":{"begin":71,"end":75}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/triggers.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":16}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6da3752f53f9199ec80a8ad0d2b565c1","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/triggers.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":16}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/branches.rb","lines":{"begin":71,"end":75}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2a596f82671816ebb68812ebe7bf8287","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/variables.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":38}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/group_variables.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":38}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9c68d19fac636a233c57119e7465aae0","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/group_variables.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":38}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/variables.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":38}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"fb90f649add7621cd688c8cf825bd6ac","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/spaced_link_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":56}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/autolink_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":54,"end":63}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"bde5f678a848776d31606c1f7b9474fa","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/autolink_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":54,"end":63}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/spaced_link_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":56}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"37daabf17a192f4d7be1f8b27c2260a6","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/fill_file_store_job_artifact.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":15}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/fill_file_store_lfs_object.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":15}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8744b4f4833ad7e9ac1e28093ac9f90e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/fill_file_store_lfs_object.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":15}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/fill_file_store_job_artifact.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":15}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7504dbd080f799a40cd6f4e9f9588e2e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/commit_service.rb","lines":{"begin":419,"end":427}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/blob_service.rb","lines":{"begin":93,"end":101}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"63af7969c300adefbe9421c884f45ddf","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/blob_service.rb","lines":{"begin":93,"end":101}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/commit_service.rb","lines":{"begin":419,"end":427}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"037891a3606e1c8a2fffd32f88e7cede","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/samplers/unicorn_sampler.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":25}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/samplers/unicorn_sampler.rb","lines":{"begin":28,"end":30}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8a65a519016a876bba37ba5a3c7a819f","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/samplers/unicorn_sampler.rb","lines":{"begin":28,"end":30}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/samplers/unicorn_sampler.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":25}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8a65a519016a876bba37ba5a3c7a819f","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/system_check/orphans/repository_check.rb","lines":{"begin":25,"end":32}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/system_check/orphans/namespace_check.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":30}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6d29fff75b609f46ded82f4a44c12b3e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/system_check/orphans/namespace_check.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":30}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/system_check/orphans/repository_check.rb","lines":{"begin":25,"end":32}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f5b93c21edd90205b8238e3ade31ae23","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/finders/concerns/created_at_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":8}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":315,"end":319}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"4781409b61d0fe8557e646dde62af4ee","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":315,"end":319}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/finders/concerns/created_at_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":8}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"99f151d4d58ba006fbb17af802305432","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/ci/pipeline.rb","lines":{"begin":572,"end":575}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/ci/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":220,"end":223}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3c0fb0db7a1fa6852c67bd50857aa448","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/ci/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":220,"end":223}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/ci/pipeline.rb","lines":{"begin":572,"end":575}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"44cfa492a10b5b72b394efe01cd9e29d","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/variables.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":57}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/group_variables.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":57}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"320c3b54951e69257faaca3316f72058","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/group_variables.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":57}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/variables.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":57}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"fa689b5b4bab39de500b86b3d6814963","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/fix_cross_project_label_links.rb","lines":{"begin":65,"end":75}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/fix_cross_project_label_links.rb","lines":{"begin":81,"end":91}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"26a19237576df2b97ff121c3b0cd2342","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/fix_cross_project_label_links.rb","lines":{"begin":81,"end":91}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/fix_cross_project_label_links.rb","lines":{"begin":65,"end":75}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"26a19237576df2b97ff121c3b0cd2342","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/repository_service.rb","lines":{"begin":136,"end":150}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/repository_service.rb","lines":{"begin":153,"end":167}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"fc526fdd6733948898ee897d1eef487e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/repository_service.rb","lines":{"begin":153,"end":167}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/repository_service.rb","lines":{"begin":136,"end":150}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"fc526fdd6733948898ee897d1eef487e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/redis/shared_state.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":29}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/redis/queues.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":28}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"077a90f16d3842a49d8095f339e2187f","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/redis/queues.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":28}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/redis/shared_state.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":29}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f48114ce0a7710485f176b1b75c08e79","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/template/issue_template.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":14}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/template/merge_request_template.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":14}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"685a5435dac10b7fc45977c34f30aba3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/template/merge_request_template.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":14}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/template/issue_template.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":14}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"bc65c6ec010926daa88fbdcb539ddeea","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/environments/mixins/environments_mixin.js","lines":{"begin":164,"end":170}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/job_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":41,"end":47}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/mixins/pipelines.js","lines":{"begin":45,"end":51}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/pipeline_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":39}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2d6588749bb4b05d1e583e13b9a75e39","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/pipeline_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":39}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/environments/mixins/environments_mixin.js","lines":{"begin":164,"end":170}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/job_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":41,"end":47}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/mixins/pipelines.js","lines":{"begin":45,"end":51}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e1b42460d85ed0074c2f1fbd38bf2631","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/mixins/pipelines.js","lines":{"begin":45,"end":51}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/environments/mixins/environments_mixin.js","lines":{"begin":164,"end":170}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/job_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":41,"end":47}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/pipeline_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":39}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f4d765094c9218d5390de58501e17b93","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/job_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":41,"end":47}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/environments/mixins/environments_mixin.js","lines":{"begin":164,"end":170}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/mixins/pipelines.js","lines":{"begin":45,"end":51}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/pipeline_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":39}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"caa789e408f667bb83169e9a6e4f54bb","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":198,"end":200}},"remediation_points":690000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":142,"end":144}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":148,"end":150}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/tree.js","lines":{"begin":42,"end":44}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 58**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7b7e24c67302a04433b92238befc3cf1","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/tree.js","lines":{"begin":42,"end":44}},"remediation_points":690000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":198,"end":200}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":142,"end":144}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":148,"end":150}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 58**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"935ca74221c521771d96150adf2278fe","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":142,"end":144}},"remediation_points":690000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":198,"end":200}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":148,"end":150}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/tree.js","lines":{"begin":42,"end":44}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 58**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"db86386cff8c19e24cbadfb75750f1d9","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":148,"end":150}},"remediation_points":690000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":198,"end":200}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":142,"end":144}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/tree.js","lines":{"begin":42,"end":44}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 58**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"db86386cff8c19e24cbadfb75750f1d9","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":41}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":43,"end":74}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":108}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"37429fdf41dd049c7cec6890f8e50c82","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":43,"end":74}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":41}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":108}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"37429fdf41dd049c7cec6890f8e50c82","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":108}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":41}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":43,"end":74}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"37429fdf41dd049c7cec6890f8e50c82","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":79,"end":96}},"remediation_points":4710000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":97,"end":114}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 192**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"860f8a405f1b26af1f14049631bd7aa9","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":97,"end":114}},"remediation_points":4710000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":79,"end":96}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 192**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"860f8a405f1b26af1f14049631bd7aa9","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/subscription_select.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":26}},"remediation_points":4710000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issue_status_select.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":25}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 192**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d440b0e1b0cca3d485fda9e0c4aaee09","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issue_status_select.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":25}},"remediation_points":4710000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/subscription_select.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":26}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 192**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d85cea2030ab41431ddc90787eb11389","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/blob/template_selectors/ci_yaml_selector.js","lines":{"begin":5,"end":32}},"remediation_points":4620000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/blob/template_selectors/dockerfile_selector.js","lines":{"begin":5,"end":32}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 189**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"4a9d91d82457a2a845b5366d5f0ce5b4","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/blob/template_selectors/dockerfile_selector.js","lines":{"begin":5,"end":32}},"remediation_points":4620000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/blob/template_selectors/ci_yaml_selector.js","lines":{"begin":5,"end":32}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 189**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9a6d28971082883e9748dd3bac2a6695","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":316,"end":324}},"remediation_points":1470000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/commit/pipelines/pipelines_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":34,"end":42}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 84**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5595f472c12029fb0da2e625d62d94d6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/commit/pipelines/pipelines_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":34,"end":42}},"remediation_points":1470000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":316,"end":324}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 84**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"30d9e8739fb74a1a2a7618b85b5e6f7a","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1204,"end":1222}},"remediation_points":3990000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1222,"end":1240}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 168**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"4725f16bae793b141b64c0921a6539b7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1222,"end":1240}},"remediation_points":3990000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1204,"end":1222}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 168**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"4725f16bae793b141b64c0921a6539b7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":37}},"remediation_points":2280000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":49,"end":70}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":82,"end":104}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 111**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"bc78d02c62558d8dc38d2567eaf302a7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":49,"end":70}},"remediation_points":2280000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":37}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":82,"end":104}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 111**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"bc78d02c62558d8dc38d2567eaf302a7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":82,"end":104}},"remediation_points":2280000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":37}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":49,"end":70}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 111**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"bc78d02c62558d8dc38d2567eaf302a7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/group_avatar.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":14}},"remediation_points":3810000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/shared/project_avatar.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":15}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 162**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"90682f4af3abe93c6405cd6eb215e9c6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/shared/project_avatar.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":15}},"remediation_points":3810000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/group_avatar.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":14}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 162**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"67e63301cd433971695d7cc16ff752b2","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/components/new_list_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":23}},"remediation_points":1350000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/components/new_list_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":66,"end":75}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 80**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"272dee8d71a4ab9c8d815e23c04c7742","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/components/new_list_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":66,"end":75}},"remediation_points":1350000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/components/new_list_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":23}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 80**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"272dee8d71a4ab9c8d815e23c04c7742","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":80}},"remediation_points":780000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":91,"end":95}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":100}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":123,"end":127}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":217,"end":221}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 61**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b1e5c7e2317fc81ce11cbdb1bfee15df","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":91,"end":95}},"remediation_points":780000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":80}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":100}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":123,"end":127}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":217,"end":221}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 61**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b1e5c7e2317fc81ce11cbdb1bfee15df","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":100}},"remediation_points":780000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":80}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":91,"end":95}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":123,"end":127}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":217,"end":221}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 61**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b1e5c7e2317fc81ce11cbdb1bfee15df","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":123,"end":127}},"remediation_points":780000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":80}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":91,"end":95}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":100}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":217,"end":221}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 61**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b1e5c7e2317fc81ce11cbdb1bfee15df","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":217,"end":221}},"remediation_points":780000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":80}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":91,"end":95}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":100}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":123,"end":127}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 61**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b1e5c7e2317fc81ce11cbdb1bfee15df","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/register.js","lines":{"begin":55,"end":59}},"remediation_points":1050000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/authenticate.js","lines":{"begin":70,"end":74}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 70**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2f1257b0729020dbf8c1e761c6b423db","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/authenticate.js","lines":{"begin":70,"end":74}},"remediation_points":1050000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/register.js","lines":{"begin":55,"end":59}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 70**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"39bdab25a792c5662feb840979099a97","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/commons/polyfills/element.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":19}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/common_utils.js","lines":{"begin":278,"end":283}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b95252006271b6a23d2d59296a0e5778","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/common_utils.js","lines":{"begin":278,"end":283}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/commons/polyfills/element.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":19}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"67ee0da8e9d2d3b183449d9e8d462f44","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":37,"end":57}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":99,"end":135}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6e9b85292de8771601751d3ed0d9dc18","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":99,"end":135}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":37,"end":57}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6e9b85292de8771601751d3ed0d9dc18","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/actions.js","lines":{"begin":105,"end":115}},"remediation_points":2700000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/actions.js","lines":{"begin":117,"end":127}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 125**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0fee1b42ff17f6df3a6f14e35f13cf18","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/actions.js","lines":{"begin":117,"end":127}},"remediation_points":2700000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/actions.js","lines":{"begin":105,"end":115}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 125**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0fee1b42ff17f6df3a6f14e35f13cf18","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":183,"end":186}},"remediation_points":750000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":188,"end":191}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":193,"end":196}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":198,"end":201}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 60**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8fc9b42e2195587e4e8d777e75ad89d8","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":188,"end":191}},"remediation_points":750000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":183,"end":186}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":193,"end":196}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":198,"end":201}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 60**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8fc9b42e2195587e4e8d777e75ad89d8","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":193,"end":196}},"remediation_points":750000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":183,"end":186}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":188,"end":191}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":198,"end":201}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 60**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8fc9b42e2195587e4e8d777e75ad89d8","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":198,"end":201}},"remediation_points":750000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":183,"end":186}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":188,"end":191}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":193,"end":196}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 60**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8fc9b42e2195587e4e8d777e75ad89d8","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/snippets/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":13}},"remediation_points":720000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/snippets/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":13}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 59**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"15c8237c5ef3dd70061ce1d44bd5d199","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/snippets/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":13}},"remediation_points":720000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/snippets/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":13}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 59**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8ae282c95da75609356442ee0da6e6fc","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/new_group_child.js","lines":{"begin":28,"end":36}},"remediation_points":660000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":253,"end":262}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 57**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"611a498e9c5e5d8f256a05631ef5ac51","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":253,"end":262}},"remediation_points":660000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/new_group_child.js","lines":{"begin":28,"end":36}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 57**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"37087f35974839e5e79033d561c840a6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issuable_bulk_update_actions.js","lines":{"begin":110,"end":117}},"remediation_points":2310000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issuable_bulk_update_actions.js","lines":{"begin":120,"end":126}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 112**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0e6b703c746c94d22e3a02f1993665ce","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issuable_bulk_update_actions.js","lines":{"begin":120,"end":126}},"remediation_points":2310000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issuable_bulk_update_actions.js","lines":{"begin":110,"end":117}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 112**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0e6b703c746c94d22e3a02f1993665ce","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"scripts/frontend/prettier.js","lines":{"begin":64,"end":64}},"remediation_points":600000,"other_locations":[{"path":"scripts/frontend/prettier.js","lines":{"begin":71,"end":71}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 55**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ef21ab3df8b01ca7e22d4d8804157d7a","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"scripts/frontend/prettier.js","lines":{"begin":71,"end":71}},"remediation_points":600000,"other_locations":[{"path":"scripts/frontend/prettier.js","lines":{"begin":64,"end":64}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 55**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ef21ab3df8b01ca7e22d4d8804157d7a","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":208,"end":211}},"remediation_points":1140000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":213,"end":216}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":218,"end":221}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 73**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8774a69c35e7469e5831f013a372ab41","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":213,"end":216}},"remediation_points":1140000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":208,"end":211}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":218,"end":221}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 73**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8774a69c35e7469e5831f013a372ab41","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":218,"end":221}},"remediation_points":1140000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":208,"end":211}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":213,"end":216}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 73**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8774a69c35e7469e5831f013a372ab41","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/mixins/pipelines.js","lines":{"begin":58,"end":63}},"remediation_points":1110000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/components/board_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":95,"end":100}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/index.js","lines":{"begin":84,"end":89}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 72**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6b694c569da1307b1f359dff7c2ba96a","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/components/board_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":95,"end":100}},"remediation_points":1110000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/index.js","lines":{"begin":84,"end":89}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/mixins/pipelines.js","lines":{"begin":58,"end":63}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 72**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3334e14e9af8a36a250b2eeea4a85929","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/index.js","lines":{"begin":84,"end":89}},"remediation_points":1110000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/components/board_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":95,"end":100}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/mixins/pipelines.js","lines":{"begin":58,"end":63}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 72**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7f09eaadb7107879ce06fbd895c6dfd2","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issue.js","lines":{"begin":133,"end":142}},"remediation_points":2130000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issue.js","lines":{"begin":144,"end":153}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 106**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"316f57fc6559be3f06b67e902431d4f3","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issue.js","lines":{"begin":144,"end":153}},"remediation_points":2130000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issue.js","lines":{"begin":133,"end":142}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 106**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"316f57fc6559be3f06b67e902431d4f3","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/groups/settings/ci_cd/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":10,"end":15}},"remediation_points":480000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/settings/ci_cd/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":19,"end":24}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 51**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7d9d7ed069d90637ae3219e74dfc3a6a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/settings/ci_cd/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":19,"end":24}},"remediation_points":480000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/groups/settings/ci_cd/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":10,"end":15}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 51**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"de8d186c2d499f4864bd5be7db1ddad4","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/register.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":53}},"remediation_points":2010000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/authenticate.js","lines":{"begin":59,"end":68}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 102**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c1e5733385780c688efc3db1ad11f746","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/authenticate.js","lines":{"begin":59,"end":68}},"remediation_points":2010000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/register.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":53}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 102**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8de13799b826a6e485d4019569e6c278","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":112,"end":122}},"remediation_points":1980000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":124,"end":134}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 101**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"762a1afa922792a6981db079fca70fa7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":124,"end":134}},"remediation_points":1980000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":112,"end":122}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 101**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"762a1afa922792a6981db079fca70fa7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects_list.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":18}},"remediation_points":1980000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups_list.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":18}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 101**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"23431c5334e56a528fc4eb179e3607ec","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups_list.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":18}},"remediation_points":1980000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects_list.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":18}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 101**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1c7090c499a2a96d464475ad7f818f11","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":605,"end":609}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":610,"end":614}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":615,"end":619}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"448aadd60c1a014f7e3ec3eed8404a65","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":610,"end":614}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":605,"end":609}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":615,"end":619}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"448aadd60c1a014f7e3ec3eed8404a65","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":615,"end":619}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":605,"end":609}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":610,"end":614}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"448aadd60c1a014f7e3ec3eed8404a65","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/plugins/filter.js","lines":{"begin":84,"end":90}},"remediation_points":1890000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/plugins/ajax_filter.js","lines":{"begin":102,"end":108}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 98**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"38d9afeb8b320571be87977725fdcafe","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/plugins/ajax_filter.js","lines":{"begin":102,"end":108}},"remediation_points":1890000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/plugins/filter.js","lines":{"begin":84,"end":90}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 98**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8f8bc2a8aade90176f81a992ae00dd6e","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/state_maps.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":21}},"remediation_points":1860000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/badges/store/mutation_types.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":21}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 97**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7a9bae0109305e0b1d43de56513651bb","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/badges/store/mutation_types.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":21}},"remediation_points":1860000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/state_maps.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":21}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 97**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"500922ffefee136d140bb5e95d7a3653","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/protected_tags/protected_tag_edit_list.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":19}},"remediation_points":1830000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/protected_branches/protected_branch_edit_list.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":19}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 96**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"746b71495fe41db39299682caa93445c","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/protected_branches/protected_branch_edit_list.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":19}},"remediation_points":1830000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/protected_tags/protected_tag_edit_list.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":19}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 96**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f5f6ce24443dd76a3e1d0f7521a36be5","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/settings_panels.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":10}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/settings_panels.js","lines":{"begin":17,"end":20}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 48**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e788e65abb5a4f6fb80e4e6628fb6d10","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/settings_panels.js","lines":{"begin":17,"end":20}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/settings_panels.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":10}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 48**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e788e65abb5a4f6fb80e4e6628fb6d10","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/test_utils/simulate_drag.js","lines":{"begin":40,"end":40}},"remediation_points":360000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/test_utils/simulate_drag.js","lines":{"begin":47,"end":47}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 47**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3f756c21d7aebceedb361afbef2d4a17","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/test_utils/simulate_drag.js","lines":{"begin":47,"end":47}},"remediation_points":360000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/test_utils/simulate_drag.js","lines":{"begin":40,"end":40}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 47**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3f756c21d7aebceedb361afbef2d4a17","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":32,"end":34}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":243,"end":245}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 46**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"50b54b3d38d73c256194eed3de425376","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":243,"end":245}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":32,"end":34}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 46**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"50b54b3d38d73c256194eed3de425376","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":103}},"remediation_points":1680000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":105,"end":112}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 91**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d3d4aa6b1ed1ed8586dbb1479749be92","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":105,"end":112}},"remediation_points":1680000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":103}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 91**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d3d4aa6b1ed1ed8586dbb1479749be92","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/mount_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":75,"end":92}},"remediation_points":1680000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/mount_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":94,"end":111}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 91**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"961bf4d63d82bd0547b50951a7db6c69","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/mount_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":94,"end":111}},"remediation_points":1680000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/mount_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":75,"end":92}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 91**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"961bf4d63d82bd0547b50951a7db6c69","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":514,"end":533}},"remediation_points":1650000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":522,"end":533}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 90**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e69530c757a3f18db186fc48d529606d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":522,"end":533}},"remediation_points":1650000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":514,"end":533}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 90**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e69530c757a3f18db186fc48d529606d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/badges/store/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":85,"end":99}},"remediation_points":1620000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/badges/store/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":100,"end":114}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 89**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0407713555d3e0c75813d9f23089bcfd","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/badges/store/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":100,"end":114}},"remediation_points":1620000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/badges/store/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":85,"end":99}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 89**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0407713555d3e0c75813d9f23089bcfd","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/monitoring/services/monitoring_service.js","lines":{"begin":34,"end":41}},"remediation_points":1620000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/monitoring/services/monitoring_service.js","lines":{"begin":48,"end":55}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 89**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d4a3e547360e709e6f65d844f47d2578","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/monitoring/services/monitoring_service.js","lines":{"begin":48,"end":55}},"remediation_points":1620000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/monitoring/services/monitoring_service.js","lines":{"begin":34,"end":41}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 89**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d4a3e547360e709e6f65d844f47d2578","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/cycle_analytics/default_event_objects.js","lines":{"begin":2,"end":14}},"remediation_points":690000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/cycle_analytics/default_event_objects.js","lines":{"begin":27,"end":39}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/cycle_analytics/default_event_objects.js","lines":{"begin":85,"end":97}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 58**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ac500b1ccac9075c6ed2fffbc9b3961c","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/cycle_analytics/default_event_objects.js","lines":{"begin":27,"end":39}},"remediation_points":690000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/cycle_analytics/default_event_objects.js","lines":{"begin":2,"end":14}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/cycle_analytics/default_event_objects.js","lines":{"begin":85,"end":97}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 58**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ac500b1ccac9075c6ed2fffbc9b3961c","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/cycle_analytics/default_event_objects.js","lines":{"begin":85,"end":97}},"remediation_points":690000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/cycle_analytics/default_event_objects.js","lines":{"begin":2,"end":14}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/cycle_analytics/default_event_objects.js","lines":{"begin":27,"end":39}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 58**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ac500b1ccac9075c6ed2fffbc9b3961c","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/store/groups_store.js","lines":{"begin":46,"end":57}},"remediation_points":1530000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/stores/pipelines_store.js","lines":{"begin":20,"end":31}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 86**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ac70092b1281d03613501e7bff10586e","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/stores/pipelines_store.js","lines":{"begin":20,"end":31}},"remediation_points":1530000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/store/groups_store.js","lines":{"begin":46,"end":57}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 86**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d99660a2eda83bcadef8b0ab894abe34","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/badges/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":28,"end":39}},"remediation_points":1500000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/badges/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":142,"end":153}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 85**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2d5915d3ead3c5d344920b58d2d29398","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/badges/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":142,"end":153}},"remediation_points":1500000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/badges/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":28,"end":39}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 85**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2d5915d3ead3c5d344920b58d2d29398","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/issue.js","lines":{"begin":58,"end":62}},"remediation_points":600000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/issue.js","lines":{"begin":78,"end":82}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/stores/sidebar_store.js","lines":{"begin":77,"end":81}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 55**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6bca973f7e7c682a30bc1ec4bf9bd764","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/issue.js","lines":{"begin":78,"end":82}},"remediation_points":600000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/issue.js","lines":{"begin":58,"end":62}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/stores/sidebar_store.js","lines":{"begin":77,"end":81}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 55**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6bca973f7e7c682a30bc1ec4bf9bd764","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/stores/sidebar_store.js","lines":{"begin":77,"end":81}},"remediation_points":600000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/issue.js","lines":{"begin":58,"end":62}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/issue.js","lines":{"begin":78,"end":82}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 55**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0eb61104cf3e71a06f399141f9b4fa0d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":50,"end":53}},"remediation_points":600000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":139,"end":142}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":162,"end":165}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 55**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ab644c43df256102910e1758c76cc0b5","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":139,"end":142}},"remediation_points":600000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":50,"end":53}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":162,"end":165}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 55**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ab644c43df256102910e1758c76cc0b5","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":162,"end":165}},"remediation_points":600000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":50,"end":53}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":139,"end":142}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 55**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ab644c43df256102910e1758c76cc0b5","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":22,"end":35}},"remediation_points":1410000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":83,"end":96}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 82**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"25ff43fa592634a300a75d479e7131a7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":83,"end":96}},"remediation_points":1410000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":22,"end":35}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 82**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"25ff43fa592634a300a75d479e7131a7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":85,"end":91}},"remediation_points":1380000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":93,"end":99}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8761bbf2f2e7182d15c059e6eda61093","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":93,"end":99}},"remediation_points":1380000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":85,"end":91}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8761bbf2f2e7182d15c059e6eda61093","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/blob/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":29}},"remediation_points":1380000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/tree/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":24,"end":40}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"10512ee694664bf38a3b98f1983d771f","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/tree/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":24,"end":40}},"remediation_points":1380000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/blob/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":29}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"cacb4070042747bc39f22b6ed696d288","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":45,"end":51}},"remediation_points":1380000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":59,"end":65}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"14f5cdeb3ea2bd6b45456111559d4372","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":59,"end":65}},"remediation_points":1380000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":45,"end":51}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"14f5cdeb3ea2bd6b45456111559d4372","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":150,"end":154}},"remediation_points":1350000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":156,"end":160}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 80**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2c9b1f08a21d96ed70ae569a5f20147b","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":156,"end":160}},"remediation_points":1350000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":150,"end":154}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 80**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2c9b1f08a21d96ed70ae569a5f20147b","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":377,"end":382}},"remediation_points":1320000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":382,"end":387}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 79**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f7da63bef0b10cc1b2852a187aa6da7a","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":382,"end":387}},"remediation_points":1320000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":377,"end":382}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 79**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f7da63bef0b10cc1b2852a187aa6da7a","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":14}},"remediation_points":1290000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/monitoring/utils/multiple_time_series.js","lines":{"begin":8,"end":19}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 78**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c151b6404d32d859c90476abc53a459a","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/monitoring/utils/multiple_time_series.js","lines":{"begin":8,"end":19}},"remediation_points":1290000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":14}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 78**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2e1258cb46a94d486ff0c217b7ee506b","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/tree.js","lines":{"begin":78,"end":84}},"remediation_points":1260000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":81,"end":87}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 77**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5801c2247d4ab393293432462fbf849b","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":81,"end":87}},"remediation_points":1260000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/tree.js","lines":{"begin":78,"end":84}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 77**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0b9486994211d1c4a0385b3c9ac7339f","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/hook_input.js","lines":{"begin":4,"end":14}},"remediation_points":1230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/hook_button.js","lines":{"begin":4,"end":14}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 76**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ce9535c497280ac0f885dd216908adc4","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/hook_button.js","lines":{"begin":4,"end":14}},"remediation_points":1230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/hook_input.js","lines":{"begin":4,"end":14}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 76**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5ee1687cc7901d1085a41d0b7d5b3730","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/actions.js","lines":{"begin":84,"end":96}},"remediation_points":1230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/file_templates/actions.js","lines":{"begin":53,"end":65}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 76**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0d9f79efa645b760bbea0b48922a8231","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/file_templates/actions.js","lines":{"begin":53,"end":65}},"remediation_points":1230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/actions.js","lines":{"begin":84,"end":96}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 76**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9033fca3ba0465c4cc79203ac97a67c6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/preview_markdown.js","lines":{"begin":197,"end":202}},"remediation_points":1200000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/preview_markdown.js","lines":{"begin":204,"end":209}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 75**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"46e2ef5ccb0e3676b035d790303474f6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/preview_markdown.js","lines":{"begin":204,"end":209}},"remediation_points":1200000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/preview_markdown.js","lines":{"begin":197,"end":202}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 75**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"46e2ef5ccb0e3676b035d790303474f6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/reports/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":61,"end":67}},"remediation_points":450000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/actions.js","lines":{"begin":73,"end":79}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":56,"end":62}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f6738e3ca61bc9141c14aca35a4ece63","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":56,"end":62}},"remediation_points":450000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/actions.js","lines":{"begin":73,"end":79}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/reports/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":61,"end":67}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b0ce2389e2ef7f95bdab6dd30392133a","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/actions.js","lines":{"begin":73,"end":79}},"remediation_points":450000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":56,"end":62}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/reports/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":61,"end":67}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e577605dea8912ffd5b82ee2e188ec76","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/actions.js","lines":{"begin":28,"end":40}},"remediation_points":1170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/actions.js","lines":{"begin":123,"end":133}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 74**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1825ad84d47a08c46a9dd2a4386db970","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/actions.js","lines":{"begin":123,"end":133}},"remediation_points":1170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/actions.js","lines":{"begin":28,"end":40}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 74**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1825ad84d47a08c46a9dd2a4386db970","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_util.js","lines":{"begin":61,"end":67}},"remediation_points":1140000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_util.js","lines":{"begin":68,"end":74}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 73**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"40924a71c4587ae28cb080829b65871c","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_util.js","lines":{"begin":68,"end":74}},"remediation_points":1140000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_util.js","lines":{"begin":61,"end":67}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 73**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"40924a71c4587ae28cb080829b65871c","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/test_utils/simulate_drag.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":9}},"remediation_points":1140000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/test_utils/simulate_drag.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":15}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 73**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ca3e7297c2c42380a6b34e26f5faa025","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/test_utils/simulate_drag.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":15}},"remediation_points":1140000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/test_utils/simulate_drag.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":9}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 73**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ca3e7297c2c42380a6b34e26f5faa025","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":22,"end":26}},"remediation_points":1110000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/branch.js","lines":{"begin":26,"end":30}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 72**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5b01e7cc1ccdb5b45e44117d01906827","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/branch.js","lines":{"begin":26,"end":30}},"remediation_points":1110000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":22,"end":26}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 72**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e8265ff476562ddb4bd141410d88ad2f","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/labels/index/index.js","lines":{"begin":12,"end":18}},"remediation_points":1110000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/milestones/shared/promote_milestone_modal_init.js","lines":{"begin":9,"end":15}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 72**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"33bcc15ccc0be1f4e4787d8882ad36e2","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/milestones/shared/promote_milestone_modal_init.js","lines":{"begin":9,"end":15}},"remediation_points":1110000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/labels/index/index.js","lines":{"begin":12,"end":18}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 72**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"931ead2443e997ee26d698667339fb06","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":222,"end":229}},"remediation_points":1080000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":237,"end":244}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 71**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"36bae5f12de5a60023e0fd8fc19f1842","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":237,"end":244}},"remediation_points":1080000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":222,"end":229}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 71**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"36bae5f12de5a60023e0fd8fc19f1842","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/register.js","lines":{"begin":71,"end":77}},"remediation_points":1080000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/authenticate.js","lines":{"begin":81,"end":87}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 71**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"47474e924fc42a7e0f1319c7a8ae13d3","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/authenticate.js","lines":{"begin":81,"end":87}},"remediation_points":1080000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/register.js","lines":{"begin":71,"end":77}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 71**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"aade96d11a83331446e70683959d49ec","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":381,"end":385}},"remediation_points":1050000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":418,"end":422}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 70**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"fdc3dab0afea85797bddfc16706a3869","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":418,"end":422}},"remediation_points":1050000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":381,"end":385}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 70**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"fdc3dab0afea85797bddfc16706a3869","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/getters.js","lines":{"begin":80,"end":83}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/getters.js","lines":{"begin":84,"end":87}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"85e1a20133858d47a7f4a64e49080aef","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/getters.js","lines":{"begin":84,"end":87}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/getters.js","lines":{"begin":80,"end":83}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"85e1a20133858d47a7f4a64e49080aef","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/frequent_items/constants.js","lines":{"begin":18,"end":28}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/frequent_items/constants.js","lines":{"begin":29,"end":37}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2c7c7576a99db4f904055a712b428b46","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/frequent_items/constants.js","lines":{"begin":29,"end":37}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/frequent_items/constants.js","lines":{"begin":18,"end":28}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2c7c7576a99db4f904055a712b428b46","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/index.js","lines":{"begin":79,"end":89}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/environments/folder/environments_folder_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":24,"end":34}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b80cd93182a7ed27e84c9e59840d8f01","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/environments/folder/environments_folder_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":24,"end":34}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/index.js","lines":{"begin":79,"end":89}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2beaf3990d7c635f7339eb68a668c3a8","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/file_templates/actions.js","lines":{"begin":9,"end":20}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/commit/actions.js","lines":{"begin":202,"end":213}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9441eb5a1202300a1a6bfdd0f0275a31","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/commit/actions.js","lines":{"begin":202,"end":213}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/file_templates/actions.js","lines":{"begin":9,"end":20}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f657ac30a9ca0e466c504f33ae3363a1","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":259,"end":264}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":264,"end":269}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"40a4102731fea710642a925d4403b398","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":264,"end":269}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":259,"end":264}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"40a4102731fea710642a925d4403b398","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff_notes/services/resolve.js","lines":{"begin":56,"end":68}},"remediation_points":990000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff_notes/services/resolve.js","lines":{"begin":70,"end":82}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 68**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f5c966c3b72bce8578a3e8c47c412d39","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff_notes/services/resolve.js","lines":{"begin":70,"end":82}},"remediation_points":990000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff_notes/services/resolve.js","lines":{"begin":56,"end":68}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 68**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f5c966c3b72bce8578a3e8c47c412d39","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":40,"end":45}},"remediation_points":990000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":46,"end":51}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 68**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5aa5f88f636432f3381edff9ce5eb33c","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":46,"end":51}},"remediation_points":990000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":40,"end":45}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 68**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5aa5f88f636432f3381edff9ce5eb33c","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":207,"end":220}},"remediation_points":990000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":221,"end":234}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 68**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c3008559d14ec2056a4514ffdfd5d04b","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":221,"end":234}},"remediation_points":990000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":207,"end":220}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 68**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c3008559d14ec2056a4514ffdfd5d04b","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/utils.js","lines":{"begin":16,"end":23}},"remediation_points":990000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1506,"end":1515}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 68**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"37585e488e2d24ae8b8b99880ff76099","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1506,"end":1515}},"remediation_points":990000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/utils.js","lines":{"begin":16,"end":23}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 68**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ea9f3aa39779bc4f5ead96ecdcd5e87c","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1526,"end":1566}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/commit/actions.js","lines":{"begin":103,"end":219}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/search/init_filtered_search.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":23}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5306c1b3e6d8ac0ac9bed008b527b8a7","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/search/init_filtered_search.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":23}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/commit/actions.js","lines":{"begin":103,"end":219}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1526,"end":1566}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"4dfd0fcaf710a6337c5924d7c4fa91ea","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/commit/actions.js","lines":{"begin":103,"end":219}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1526,"end":1566}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/search/init_filtered_search.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":23}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"71749d080c69b950423ce3e73b3671d6","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/labels/index/index.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":48}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/milestones/shared/delete_milestone_modal_init.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":48}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/milestones/shared/promote_milestone_modal_init.js","lines":{"begin":39,"end":43}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"80bd962a66c5ba8f3bb261204e0e8404","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/milestones/shared/delete_milestone_modal_init.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":48}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/milestones/shared/promote_milestone_modal_init.js","lines":{"begin":39,"end":43}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/labels/index/index.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":48}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"4dccfbb8118720c67894021eefaeb04f","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/milestones/shared/promote_milestone_modal_init.js","lines":{"begin":39,"end":43}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/milestones/shared/delete_milestone_modal_init.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":48}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/labels/index/index.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":48}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"594be23bc97d64731abf2df62520ccd3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/clusters/services/clusters_service.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":12}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/clusters/clusters_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":102}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5b85961f2c362ae642ccf393b8352fcb","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/clusters/clusters_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":102}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/clusters/services/clusters_service.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":12}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"cad81c7468728ba369f9f23c8a1271bc","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":91,"end":93}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":172,"end":174}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"beda25571cf3ea070a68d9cdfae91c8d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":172,"end":174}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":91,"end":93}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"beda25571cf3ea070a68d9cdfae91c8d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/pipeline_schedules/shared/components/target_branch_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":48,"end":53}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/pipeline_schedules/shared/components/timezone_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":63,"end":67}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"575f1444e3c2fec5a4f47d049cbd87c0","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/pipeline_schedules/shared/components/timezone_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":63,"end":67}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/pipeline_schedules/shared/components/target_branch_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":48,"end":53}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5e4303b5381a6be7bcaade373d766f34","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/register.js","lines":{"begin":35,"end":42}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/authenticate.js","lines":{"begin":50,"end":57}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1d8b266328571b1177e922384e474eb5","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/authenticate.js","lines":{"begin":50,"end":57}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/register.js","lines":{"begin":35,"end":42}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"334a900ffecf98fb6a951456c58236a1","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":181,"end":183}},"remediation_points":930000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":290,"end":292}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 66**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"32fbc7cab878611e7f156798ae3d2bca","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":290,"end":292}},"remediation_points":930000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":181,"end":183}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 66**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"32fbc7cab878611e7f156798ae3d2bca","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/project.js","lines":{"begin":50,"end":56}},"remediation_points":930000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/project.js","lines":{"begin":57,"end":63}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 66**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2c14eefb5c2db69bb969956efd4384de","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/project.js","lines":{"begin":57,"end":63}},"remediation_points":930000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/project.js","lines":{"begin":50,"end":56}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 66**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2c14eefb5c2db69bb969956efd4384de","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":277,"end":286}},"remediation_points":930000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":287,"end":296}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 66**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"923d82c4da880c23e929c2402aedd37e","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":287,"end":296}},"remediation_points":930000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":277,"end":286}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 66**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"923d82c4da880c23e929c2402aedd37e","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/blob/blob_fork_suggestion.js","lines":{"begin":31,"end":34}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/blob/blob_fork_suggestion.js","lines":{"begin":56,"end":59}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"938856cdef6ef5aa2933db645ea96362","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/blob/blob_fork_suggestion.js","lines":{"begin":56,"end":59}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/blob/blob_fork_suggestion.js","lines":{"begin":31,"end":34}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"938856cdef6ef5aa2933db645ea96362","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/index.js","lines":{"begin":30,"end":39}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/mr_notes/index.js","lines":{"begin":66,"end":75}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b35237501aeed21f2d38aef31627b97e","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/mr_notes/index.js","lines":{"begin":66,"end":75}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/index.js","lines":{"begin":30,"end":39}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"17da47f3678555baddd89ae6622e441f","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":18,"end":31}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":46}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"a93d28498cd20f4d35a3f8dbbc0a7a35","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":46}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":18,"end":31}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"a93d28498cd20f4d35a3f8dbbc0a7a35","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":237,"end":241}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":340,"end":344}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"785078efeabfa8c98aa5bf0804b2619d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":340,"end":344}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":237,"end":241}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"785078efeabfa8c98aa5bf0804b2619d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/utils.js","lines":{"begin":112,"end":122}},"remediation_points":840000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/lib/diff/controller.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":16}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 63**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"09d7d5a8cacd9d95c32bc8b4e6b53930","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/lib/diff/controller.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":16}},"remediation_points":840000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/utils.js","lines":{"begin":112,"end":122}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 63**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f94a7934b1c80152deb5b61a0c5db3d4","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":118,"end":124}},"remediation_points":810000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":126,"end":132}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 62**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"104c7ee7f9a45a32c42bacfaa5a5f1bc","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":126,"end":132}},"remediation_points":810000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":118,"end":124}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 62**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"104c7ee7f9a45a32c42bacfaa5a5f1bc","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/comment_type_toggle.js","lines":{"begin":37,"end":46}},"remediation_points":810000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/comment_type_toggle.js","lines":{"begin":48,"end":57}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 62**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1f17e867f83499d67ff9ed50b8097db5","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/comment_type_toggle.js","lines":{"begin":48,"end":57}},"remediation_points":810000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/comment_type_toggle.js","lines":{"begin":37,"end":46}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 62**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1f17e867f83499d67ff9ed50b8097db5","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/pipeline_details_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":77,"end":84}},"remediation_points":810000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/job_details_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":27,"end":34}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 62**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c4a434df3787893bc1f6d897464a8227","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/job_details_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":27,"end":34}},"remediation_points":810000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/pipeline_details_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":77,"end":84}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 62**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5c1f719b9039c86ffdc704317d783449","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/labels/index/index.js","lines":{"begin":20,"end":24}},"remediation_points":780000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/milestones/shared/promote_milestone_modal_init.js","lines":{"begin":17,"end":21}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 61**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ab079e1e6bc28e1fc184b520beb34531","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/milestones/shared/promote_milestone_modal_init.js","lines":{"begin":17,"end":21}},"remediation_points":780000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/labels/index/index.js","lines":{"begin":20,"end":24}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 61**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e7369e08c5971c04639cff93271173af","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":56,"end":59}},"remediation_points":750000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":61,"end":64}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 60**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1ad13a005d315ccf15cfe0584579158f","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":61,"end":64}},"remediation_points":750000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":56,"end":59}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 60**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1ad13a005d315ccf15cfe0584579158f","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/sessions/new/username_validator.js","lines":{"begin":107,"end":111}},"remediation_points":750000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/sessions/new/username_validator.js","lines":{"begin":113,"end":117}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 60**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c9228663eecdf0fc1a8dbd811c863e38","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/sessions/new/username_validator.js","lines":{"begin":113,"end":117}},"remediation_points":750000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/sessions/new/username_validator.js","lines":{"begin":107,"end":111}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 60**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c9228663eecdf0fc1a8dbd811c863e38","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/hook_button.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":36}},"remediation_points":720000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/landing.js","lines":{"begin":18,"end":21}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 59**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0cdcc38394199ec6567937ce812cb5a5","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/landing.js","lines":{"begin":18,"end":21}},"remediation_points":720000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/hook_button.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":36}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 59**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6b06657bea1bfe588af0efba4a2bf57e","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/pipeline_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":26,"end":31}},"remediation_points":720000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/job_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":34,"end":39}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 59**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1f5e585cdfd268a3748dbdd584f69df8","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/job_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":34,"end":39}},"remediation_points":720000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/pipeline_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":26,"end":31}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 59**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"67d77d7b888d52cac1d666c6a95ba502","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/tree.js","lines":{"begin":38,"end":46}},"remediation_points":720000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/tree.js","lines":{"begin":49,"end":57}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 59**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"16eb34236a934fb101dbe1e8b6ab4af1","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/tree.js","lines":{"begin":49,"end":57}},"remediation_points":720000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/tree.js","lines":{"begin":38,"end":46}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 59**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"16eb34236a934fb101dbe1e8b6ab4af1","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":191,"end":203}},"remediation_points":690000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":236,"end":248}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 58**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"13f117af1725bb929e7aa63491a25429","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":236,"end":248}},"remediation_points":690000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":191,"end":203}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 58**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"13f117af1725bb929e7aa63491a25429","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/groups_filterable_list.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":16}},"remediation_points":660000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":238,"end":247}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 57**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2a553868b7fea8b08596f9a95a22d484","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":238,"end":247}},"remediation_points":660000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/groups_filterable_list.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":16}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 57**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"12bd1fc0fd53a6c025f6ed5d690be133","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/admin/application_settings/usage_ping_payload.js","lines":{"begin":45,"end":49}},"remediation_points":660000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/admin/application_settings/usage_ping_payload.js","lines":{"begin":51,"end":55}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 57**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e7e7f0899a668845138c08c503e337fe","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/admin/application_settings/usage_ping_payload.js","lines":{"begin":51,"end":55}},"remediation_points":660000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/admin/application_settings/usage_ping_payload.js","lines":{"begin":45,"end":49}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 57**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e7e7f0899a668845138c08c503e337fe","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/admin/broadcast_messages/broadcast_message.js","lines":{"begin":8,"end":11}},"remediation_points":660000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/admin/broadcast_messages/broadcast_message.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":16}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 57**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"21bb124a570e4088d0684442dade767f","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/admin/broadcast_messages/broadcast_message.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":16}},"remediation_points":660000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/admin/broadcast_messages/broadcast_message.js","lines":{"begin":8,"end":11}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 57**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"21bb124a570e4088d0684442dade767f","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/namespace_select.js","lines":{"begin":20,"end":26}},"remediation_points":630000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/namespace_select.js","lines":{"begin":40,"end":46}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 56**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d22f4f9ddac4d361d9f6721a25ded899","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/namespace_select.js","lines":{"begin":40,"end":46}},"remediation_points":630000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/namespace_select.js","lines":{"begin":20,"end":26}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 56**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d22f4f9ddac4d361d9f6721a25ded899","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects/project_new.js","lines":{"begin":103,"end":116}},"remediation_points":630000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/constants.js","lines":{"begin":43,"end":56}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 56**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d9ad4d62a2c7b3a5ee02495f81a78cd8","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/constants.js","lines":{"begin":43,"end":56}},"remediation_points":630000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects/project_new.js","lines":{"begin":103,"end":116}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 56**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b9bd1f7a0fafe178e70f6a652d6fd8be","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/components/diff_file_editor.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":26}},"remediation_points":570000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff_notes/components/resolve_discussion_btn.js","lines":{"begin":8,"end":21}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 54**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"423d5a0cc874e941bd22657b325446b4","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff_notes/components/resolve_discussion_btn.js","lines":{"begin":8,"end":21}},"remediation_points":570000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/components/diff_file_editor.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":26}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 54**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"716df5a6c1cbc00338163aa638130bca","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":436,"end":441}},"remediation_points":570000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":452,"end":457}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 54**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5a2cd4548ee8c0362f69cc88ee5982c0","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":452,"end":457}},"remediation_points":570000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":436,"end":441}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 54**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5a2cd4548ee8c0362f69cc88ee5982c0","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":214,"end":221}},"remediation_points":570000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/search/init_filtered_search.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":20}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 54**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e71451918dac542ee62e859e4a694a23","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/search/init_filtered_search.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":20}},"remediation_points":570000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":214,"end":221}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 54**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6696916f5ca830f21733956d3dc83b22","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/prometheus_metrics/prometheus_metrics.js","lines":{"begin":45,"end":49}},"remediation_points":570000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/prometheus_metrics/prometheus_metrics.js","lines":{"begin":50,"end":54}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 54**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"723e924a871cea3a66a3ccd49f2f4407","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/prometheus_metrics/prometheus_metrics.js","lines":{"begin":50,"end":54}},"remediation_points":570000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/prometheus_metrics/prometheus_metrics.js","lines":{"begin":45,"end":49}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 54**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"723e924a871cea3a66a3ccd49f2f4407","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":97,"end":102}},"remediation_points":540000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":103,"end":108}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 53**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"38cb87a7a94d43c42903f71cfd248953","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":103,"end":108}},"remediation_points":540000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":97,"end":102}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 53**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"38cb87a7a94d43c42903f71cfd248953","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects/project_new.js","lines":{"begin":125,"end":129}},"remediation_points":540000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects/project_new.js","lines":{"begin":150,"end":153}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 53**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"77fe9230b5c1c681ca23dd48b5bde881","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects/project_new.js","lines":{"begin":150,"end":153}},"remediation_points":540000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects/project_new.js","lines":{"begin":125,"end":129}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 53**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"77fe9230b5c1c681ca23dd48b5bde881","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/reports/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":39,"end":42}},"remediation_points":540000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/reports/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":47}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 53**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6369d3d651e38cbbac285afad5297e9d","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/reports/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":47}},"remediation_points":540000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/reports/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":39,"end":42}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 53**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6369d3d651e38cbbac285afad5297e9d","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/clusters/clusters_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":108,"end":111}},"remediation_points":510000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/clusters/clusters_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":113,"end":116}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 52**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2b8d07121aa08a0ef9af946ea4e5d60d","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/clusters/clusters_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":113,"end":116}},"remediation_points":510000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/clusters/clusters_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":108,"end":111}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 52**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2b8d07121aa08a0ef9af946ea4e5d60d","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/zen_mode.js","lines":{"begin":42,"end":45}},"remediation_points":510000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/zen_mode.js","lines":{"begin":46,"end":49}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 52**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1c224ff513833f281d7bb58fb1280314","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/zen_mode.js","lines":{"begin":46,"end":49}},"remediation_points":510000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/zen_mode.js","lines":{"begin":42,"end":45}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 52**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1c224ff513833f281d7bb58fb1280314","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions.js","lines":{"begin":133,"end":136}},"remediation_points":480000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions.js","lines":{"begin":144,"end":147}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 51**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5e09ce34a63a712c502dfcaa775c5a8e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions.js","lines":{"begin":144,"end":147}},"remediation_points":480000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions.js","lines":{"begin":133,"end":136}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 51**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5e09ce34a63a712c502dfcaa775c5a8e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":120,"end":123}},"remediation_points":480000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":128,"end":131}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 51**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5dcf5b9ed09acddcf34d9b99f4f7d4e0","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":128,"end":131}},"remediation_points":480000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":120,"end":123}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 51**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5dcf5b9ed09acddcf34d9b99f4f7d4e0","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects/tree/services/commit_pipeline_service.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":11}},"remediation_points":480000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/services/job_service.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":11}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 51**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"020d87eef79dcc6d4979a4877f795e88","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/services/job_service.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":11}},"remediation_points":480000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects/tree/services/commit_pipeline_service.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":11}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 51**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7f3c54ba927268843f9fe397b30c4541","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/star.js","lines":{"begin":19,"end":23}},"remediation_points":480000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/star.js","lines":{"begin":23,"end":27}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 51**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"cc2a5b7fe6f4a900c4690f4960b1d2ce","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/star.js","lines":{"begin":23,"end":27}},"remediation_points":480000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/star.js","lines":{"begin":19,"end":23}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 51**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"cc2a5b7fe6f4a900c4690f4960b1d2ce","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/store/groups_store.js","lines":{"begin":102,"end":104}},"remediation_points":450000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/stores/modal_store.js","lines":{"begin":71,"end":74}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e9ffa7b55a2d3d697297bb9c77d9e0c8","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/stores/modal_store.js","lines":{"begin":71,"end":74}},"remediation_points":450000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/store/groups_store.js","lines":{"begin":102,"end":104}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"cae962d929e29ddbbe69117801f17860","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/groups/issues/index.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":13}},"remediation_points":450000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/groups/merge_requests/index.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":13}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"65a33b3fe4ae20436c9fb46d65d9db04","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/groups/merge_requests/index.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":13}},"remediation_points":450000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/groups/issues/index.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":13}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1b0f3dfb819efd869e74a58517390763","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/pipeline_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":55,"end":58}},"remediation_points":450000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/job_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":51,"end":54}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ed657cc5e6969316c8bd1d2be6204668","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/job_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":51,"end":54}},"remediation_points":450000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/pipeline_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":55,"end":58}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3da1a06772dc32dbbb550900c97f6cbd","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":125,"end":130}},"remediation_points":420000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":154,"end":159}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 49**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f6c22427e43838beefc533b33cde9955","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":154,"end":159}},"remediation_points":420000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":125,"end":130}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 49**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f6c22427e43838beefc533b33cde9955","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/deploy_keys/service/index.js","lines":{"begin":15,"end":18}},"remediation_points":420000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/deploy_keys/service/index.js","lines":{"begin":20,"end":23}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 49**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5eaf7d9cd8339dca959f74f384e02906","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/deploy_keys/service/index.js","lines":{"begin":20,"end":23}},"remediation_points":420000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/deploy_keys/service/index.js","lines":{"begin":15,"end":18}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 49**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5eaf7d9cd8339dca959f74f384e02906","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":146,"end":148}},"remediation_points":420000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":250,"end":252}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 49**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"70155684217b5724087f40626f7766bc","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":250,"end":252}},"remediation_points":420000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":146,"end":148}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 49**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"70155684217b5724087f40626f7766bc","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":134,"end":137}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":138,"end":141}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 48**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"180e35eb524273ddfc92de366020a611","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":138,"end":141}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":134,"end":137}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 48**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"180e35eb524273ddfc92de366020a611","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issuable_bulk_update_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":100,"end":106}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issuable_bulk_update_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":117,"end":123}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 48**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"672a79b04a463defdd46c0086474fd52","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issuable_bulk_update_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":117,"end":123}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issuable_bulk_update_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":100,"end":106}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 48**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"672a79b04a463defdd46c0086474fd52","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":66,"end":69}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":146,"end":149}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 48**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"4ebfab6abe3fb873067f7b37190c9136","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":146,"end":149}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":66,"end":69}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 48**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"4ebfab6abe3fb873067f7b37190c9136","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/hook_input.js","lines":{"begin":46,"end":53}},"remediation_points":360000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/hook_input.js","lines":{"begin":60,"end":67}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 47**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"10bdf4c525726570be1c10982443983e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/hook_input.js","lines":{"begin":60,"end":67}},"remediation_points":360000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/hook_input.js","lines":{"begin":46,"end":53}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 47**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"10bdf4c525726570be1c10982443983e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_hint.js","lines":{"begin":75,"end":77}},"remediation_points":360000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_user.js","lines":{"begin":78,"end":80}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 47**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"223d4160dbc2f173c7019bf4258bf71a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_user.js","lines":{"begin":78,"end":80}},"remediation_points":360000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_hint.js","lines":{"begin":75,"end":77}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 47**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2f69c39865bb0c31ba27242592efb90a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1451,"end":1457}},"remediation_points":360000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1459,"end":1465}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 47**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"06432a7535afbcbc307fe2c2fad49f03","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1459,"end":1465}},"remediation_points":360000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1451,"end":1457}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 47**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"06432a7535afbcbc307fe2c2fad49f03","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":63,"end":66}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":423,"end":426}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 46**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3cf8b42abcd81551bbf1d4b6a86a23ec","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":423,"end":426}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":63,"end":66}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 46**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3cf8b42abcd81551bbf1d4b6a86a23ec","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_dropdown_manager.js","lines":{"begin":223,"end":224}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":564,"end":565}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 46**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9b59a169ec24710bb17e53176d9f6484","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":564,"end":565}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_dropdown_manager.js","lines":{"begin":223,"end":224}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 46**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"629f61554a8bb6a8eb033206d609a01e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_form.js","lines":{"begin":93,"end":95}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_form.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":98}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 46**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"a37da012d8b9134f9c2c07cbe6e5df45","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_form.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":98}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_form.js","lines":{"begin":93,"end":95}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 46**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"a37da012d8b9134f9c2c07cbe6e5df45","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/issue.js","lines":{"begin":48,"end":52}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/issue.js","lines":{"begin":68,"end":72}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ad4849cc4103d257a75a53f533f93f88","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/issue.js","lines":{"begin":68,"end":72}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/issue.js","lines":{"begin":48,"end":52}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ad4849cc4103d257a75a53f533f93f88","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/project.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":6}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/milestone.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":6}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"63e808e699724c7876463b889a910d69","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/milestone.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":6}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/project.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":6}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2d888235869b541141524699d46a10fe","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":142,"end":143}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":139,"end":139}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"a5d03fc520fddde3ecc4ff06b86c9a0d","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":139,"end":139}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":142,"end":143}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5a0bd2adf62a695699f94e1cef624dd7","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":73,"end":76}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":78,"end":81}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1dc35d639071fed3c333a47b9c544d56","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":78,"end":81}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":73,"end":76}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1dc35d639071fed3c333a47b9c544d56","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/users/activity_calendar.js","lines":{"begin":234,"end":240}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/users/activity_calendar.js","lines":{"begin":260,"end":266}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c9f4b3f70b4ef899508948c84a381a89","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/users/activity_calendar.js","lines":{"begin":260,"end":266}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/users/activity_calendar.js","lines":{"begin":234,"end":240}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c9f4b3f70b4ef899508948c84a381a89","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/protected_tags/protected_tag_edit.js","lines":{"begin":16,"end":20}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/protected_branches/protected_branch_edit.js","lines":{"begin":24,"end":28}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2d44f8e3653f3f06777c422f4151a7d3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/protected_branches/protected_branch_edit.js","lines":{"begin":24,"end":28}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/protected_tags/protected_tag_edit.js","lines":{"begin":16,"end":20}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n* [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n* [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n* [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n* [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n* [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n* [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n* [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n* [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n* [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n* [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9ff0344a1b63248724d8413b03573b43","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"categories":["Security"],"check_name":"Insecure Dependency","content":{"body":"**Advisory**: CVE-2018-1000211\n\n**URL**: https://blog.justinbull.ca/cve-2018-1000211-public-apps-cant-revoke-tokens-in-doorkeeper/\n\n**Solution**: upgrade to >= 4.4.0, >= 5.0.0.rc2"},"description":"Doorkeeper gem does not revoke token for public clients","location":{"path":"Gemfile.lock","lines":{"begin":173,"end":173}},"remediation_points":5000000,"severity":"minor","type":"Issue","fingerprint":"13e50c564110ecb5eba441004fe52261","engine_name":"bundler-audit"},{"categories":["Security"],"check_name":"Insecure Dependency","content":{"body":"**Advisory**: CVE-2018-3769\n\n**URL**: https://github.com/ruby-grape/grape/issues/1762\n\n**Solution**: upgrade to >= 1.1.0"},"description":"ruby-grape Gem has XSS via \"format\" parameter","location":{"path":"Gemfile.lock","lines":{"begin":346,"end":346}},"remediation_points":5000000,"severity":"minor","type":"Issue","fingerprint":"ac6d981abbf80f299374d5a1081c7d66","engine_name":"bundler-audit"}] diff --git a/spec/fixtures/codequality/codequality.json.gz b/spec/fixtures/codequality/codequality.json.gz Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f04ec0065b4 --- /dev/null +++ b/spec/fixtures/codequality/codequality.json.gz diff --git a/spec/fixtures/ssh_host_example_key.pub b/spec/fixtures/ssh_host_example_key.pub index 6bac42b3ad0..d43315ddae8 100644 --- a/spec/fixtures/ssh_host_example_key.pub +++ b/spec/fixtures/ssh_host_example_key.pub @@ -1 +1 @@ -random content +ssh-rsa AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAADAQABAAABAQCuRkAgwaap/pXThwCpjX8Wd5tR36Tqx3sW2sVVHs3UKB7kd+xNknw7e4qpuEATv56xHrhKm2+ye/JidTuQ/1EwFhjaz7I5wTslfVawQpeH1ZqAGmvdO/xTw+l7fgEFVlGVx9y0HV3m52y2C9yw82qmg+BohbTVgPtjjutpFc+CwLQxLTnTrRhZf5udQgz+YlwLv+Y0kDx6+DWWOl8N9+TWuGyFKBln79CyBgFcK5NFmF48kYn8W+r7rmawfw9XbuF1aa+6JF+6cNR1mCEonyrRLdXP+vWcxpLKYfejB0NmA1y+W9M/K53AcIHA5zlRQ49tFh0P22eh/Gl8JQ6yyuin foo@bar.mynet diff --git a/spec/helpers/avatars_helper_spec.rb b/spec/helpers/avatars_helper_spec.rb index 55ee87163f9..aa0442ab847 100644 --- a/spec/helpers/avatars_helper_spec.rb +++ b/spec/helpers/avatars_helper_spec.rb @@ -32,18 +32,6 @@ describe AvatarsHelper do end end - context 'when providing a project path' do - it_behaves_like 'resource with a default avatar', 'project' do - let(:resource) { create(:project, name: 'foo') } - let(:helper_args) { [resource.full_path] } - end - - it_behaves_like 'resource with a custom avatar', 'project' do - let(:resource) { create(:project, :public, avatar: File.open(uploaded_image_temp_path)) } - let(:helper_args) { [resource.full_path] } - end - end - context 'when providing a group' do it_behaves_like 'resource with a default avatar', 'group' do let(:resource) { create(:group, name: 'foo') } @@ -55,18 +43,6 @@ describe AvatarsHelper do let(:helper_args) { [resource] } end end - - context 'when providing a group path' do - it_behaves_like 'resource with a default avatar', 'group' do - let(:resource) { create(:group, name: 'foo') } - let(:helper_args) { [resource.full_path] } - end - - it_behaves_like 'resource with a custom avatar', 'group' do - let(:resource) { create(:group, avatar: File.open(uploaded_image_temp_path)) } - let(:helper_args) { [resource.full_path] } - end - end end describe '#avatar_icon_for' do diff --git a/spec/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/highlight_current_user_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/highlight_current_user_spec.js new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3305ddc412d --- /dev/null +++ b/spec/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/highlight_current_user_spec.js @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +import highlightCurrentUser from '~/behaviors/markdown/highlight_current_user'; + +describe('highlightCurrentUser', () => { + let rootElement; + let elements; + + beforeEach(() => { + setFixtures(` + <div id="dummy-root-element"> + <div data-user="1">@first</div> + <div data-user="2">@second</div> + </div> + `); + rootElement = document.getElementById('dummy-root-element'); + elements = rootElement.querySelectorAll('[data-user]'); + }); + + describe('without current user', () => { + beforeEach(() => { + window.gon = window.gon || {}; + window.gon.current_user_id = null; + }); + + afterEach(() => { + delete window.gon.current_user_id; + }); + + it('does not highlight the user', () => { + const initialHtml = rootElement.outerHTML; + + highlightCurrentUser(elements); + + expect(rootElement.outerHTML).toBe(initialHtml); + }); + }); + + describe('with current user', () => { + beforeEach(() => { + window.gon = window.gon || {}; + window.gon.current_user_id = 2; + }); + + afterEach(() => { + delete window.gon.current_user_id; + }); + + it('highlights current user', () => { + highlightCurrentUser(elements); + + expect(elements.length).toBe(2); + expect(elements[0]).not.toHaveClass('current-user'); + expect(elements[1]).toHaveClass('current-user'); + }); + }); +}); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/boards/board_new_issue_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/boards/board_new_issue_spec.js index ee37821ad08..1245e3e099a 100644 --- a/spec/javascripts/boards/board_new_issue_spec.js +++ b/spec/javascripts/boards/board_new_issue_spec.js @@ -69,7 +69,6 @@ describe('Issue boards new issue form', () => { vm.$el.querySelector('.btn-success').click(); expect(vm.submit.calls.count()).toBe(1); - expect(vm.$refs['submit-button']).toBe(vm.$el.querySelector('.btn-success')); }) .then(done) .catch(done.fail); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/app_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/app_spec.js index cf7d8df5405..a3a714678af 100644 --- a/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/app_spec.js +++ b/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/app_spec.js @@ -44,7 +44,8 @@ describe('diffs/components/app', () => { it('shows comments message, with commit', done => { vm.$store.state.diffs.commit = getDiffWithCommit().commit; - vm.$nextTick() + vm + .$nextTick() .then(() => { expect(vm.$el).toContainText('Only comments from the following commit are shown below'); expect(vm.$el).toContainElement('.blob-commit-info'); @@ -55,10 +56,14 @@ describe('diffs/components/app', () => { it('shows comments message, with old mergeRequestDiff', done => { vm.$store.state.diffs.mergeRequestDiff = { latest: false }; + vm.$store.state.diffs.targetBranch = 'master'; - vm.$nextTick() + vm + .$nextTick() .then(() => { - expect(vm.$el).toContainText("Not all comments are displayed because you're viewing an old version of the diff."); + expect(vm.$el).toContainText( + "Not all comments are displayed because you're viewing an old version of the diff.", + ); }) .then(done) .catch(done.fail); @@ -67,9 +72,12 @@ describe('diffs/components/app', () => { it('shows comments message, with startVersion', done => { vm.$store.state.diffs.startVersion = 'test'; - vm.$nextTick() + vm + .$nextTick() .then(() => { - expect(vm.$el).toContainText("Not all comments are displayed because you're comparing two versions of the diff."); + expect(vm.$el).toContainText( + "Not all comments are displayed because you're comparing two versions of the diff.", + ); }) .then(done) .catch(done.fail); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/changed_files_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/changed_files_spec.js deleted file mode 100644 index 7f21273a991..00000000000 --- a/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/changed_files_spec.js +++ /dev/null @@ -1,105 +0,0 @@ -import Vue from 'vue'; -import Vuex from 'vuex'; -import { mountComponentWithStore } from 'spec/helpers'; -import diffsModule from '~/diffs/store/modules'; -import changedFiles from '~/diffs/components/changed_files.vue'; - -describe('ChangedFiles', () => { - const Component = Vue.extend(changedFiles); - const store = new Vuex.Store({ - modules: { - diffs: diffsModule(), - }, - }); - - let vm; - - beforeEach(() => { - setFixtures(` - <div id="dummy-element"></div> - <div class="js-tabs-affix"></div> - `); - - const props = { - diffFiles: [ - { - addedLines: 10, - removedLines: 20, - blob: { - path: 'some/code.txt', - }, - filePath: 'some/code.txt', - }, - ], - }; - - vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, { props, store }); - }); - - describe('with single file added', () => { - it('shows files changes', () => { - expect(vm.$el).toContainText('1 changed file'); - }); - - it('shows file additions and deletions', () => { - expect(vm.$el).toContainText('10 additions'); - expect(vm.$el).toContainText('20 deletions'); - }); - }); - - describe('diff view mode buttons', () => { - let inlineButton; - let parallelButton; - - beforeEach(() => { - inlineButton = vm.$el.querySelector('.js-inline-diff-button'); - parallelButton = vm.$el.querySelector('.js-parallel-diff-button'); - }); - - it('should have Inline and Side-by-side buttons', () => { - expect(inlineButton).toBeDefined(); - expect(parallelButton).toBeDefined(); - }); - - it('should add active class to Inline button', done => { - vm.$store.state.diffs.diffViewType = 'inline'; - - vm.$nextTick(() => { - expect(inlineButton.classList.contains('active')).toEqual(true); - expect(parallelButton.classList.contains('active')).toEqual(false); - - done(); - }); - }); - - it('should toggle active state of buttons when diff view type changed', done => { - vm.$store.state.diffs.diffViewType = 'parallel'; - - vm.$nextTick(() => { - expect(inlineButton.classList.contains('active')).toEqual(false); - expect(parallelButton.classList.contains('active')).toEqual(true); - - done(); - }); - }); - - describe('clicking them', () => { - it('should toggle the diff view type', done => { - parallelButton.click(); - - vm.$nextTick(() => { - expect(inlineButton.classList.contains('active')).toEqual(false); - expect(parallelButton.classList.contains('active')).toEqual(true); - - inlineButton.click(); - - vm.$nextTick(() => { - expect(inlineButton.classList.contains('active')).toEqual(true); - expect(parallelButton.classList.contains('active')).toEqual(false); - done(); - }); - }); - }); - }); - }); -}); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/commit_item_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/commit_item_spec.js index 627fb8c490a..8c3376c0eb3 100644 --- a/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/commit_item_spec.js +++ b/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/commit_item_spec.js @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ import getDiffWithCommit from '../mock_data/diff_with_commit'; const TEST_AUTHOR_NAME = 'test'; const TEST_AUTHOR_EMAIL = 'test+test@gitlab.com'; const TEST_AUTHOR_GRAVATAR = `${TEST_HOST}/avatar/test?s=36`; +const TEST_SIGNATURE_HTML = '<a>Legit commit</a>'; +const TEST_PIPELINE_STATUS_PATH = `${TEST_HOST}/pipeline/status`; const getTitleElement = vm => vm.$el.querySelector('.commit-row-message.item-title'); const getDescElement = vm => vm.$el.querySelector('pre.commit-row-description'); @@ -16,6 +18,7 @@ const getDescExpandElement = vm => vm.$el.querySelector('.commit-content .text-e const getShaElement = vm => vm.$el.querySelector('.commit-sha-group'); const getAvatarElement = vm => vm.$el.querySelector('.user-avatar-link'); const getCommitterElement = vm => vm.$el.querySelector('.commiter'); +const getCommitActionsElement = vm => vm.$el.querySelector('.commit-actions'); describe('diffs/components/commit_widget', () => { const Component = Vue.extend(CommitItem); @@ -125,4 +128,36 @@ describe('diffs/components/commit_widget', () => { expect(nameElement).toHaveText(TEST_AUTHOR_NAME); }); }); + + describe('with signature', () => { + beforeEach(done => { + vm.commit.signatureHtml = TEST_SIGNATURE_HTML; + + vm.$nextTick() + .then(done) + .catch(done.fail); + }); + + it('renders signature html', () => { + const actionsElement = getCommitActionsElement(vm); + + expect(actionsElement).toContainHtml(TEST_SIGNATURE_HTML); + }); + }); + + describe('with pipeline status', () => { + beforeEach(done => { + vm.commit.pipelineStatusPath = TEST_PIPELINE_STATUS_PATH; + + vm.$nextTick() + .then(done) + .catch(done.fail); + }); + + it('renders pipeline status', () => { + const actionsElement = getCommitActionsElement(vm); + + expect(actionsElement).toContainElement('.ci-status-link'); + }); + }); }); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/file_row_stats_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/file_row_stats_spec.js new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a8a7f3f1d82 --- /dev/null +++ b/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/file_row_stats_spec.js @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ +import Vue from 'vue'; +import FileRowStats from '~/diffs/components/file_row_stats.vue'; +import mountComponent from 'spec/helpers/vue_mount_component_helper'; + +describe('Diff file row stats', () => { + let Component; + let vm; + + beforeAll(() => { + Component = Vue.extend(FileRowStats); + }); + + beforeEach(() => { + vm = mountComponent(Component, { + file: { + addedLines: 20, + removedLines: 10, + }, + }); + }); + + afterEach(() => { + vm.$destroy(); + }); + + it('renders added lines count', () => { + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.cgreen').textContent).toContain('+20'); + }); + + it('renders removed lines count', () => { + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.cred').textContent).toContain('-10'); + }); +}); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/tree_list_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/tree_list_spec.js new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..08e25d2004e --- /dev/null +++ b/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/tree_list_spec.js @@ -0,0 +1,120 @@ +import Vue from 'vue'; +import Vuex from 'vuex'; +import TreeList from '~/diffs/components/tree_list.vue'; +import createStore from '~/diffs/store/modules'; +import { mountComponentWithStore } from 'spec/helpers/vue_mount_component_helper'; + +describe('Diffs tree list component', () => { + let Component; + let vm; + + beforeAll(() => { + Component = Vue.extend(TreeList); + }); + + beforeEach(() => { + Vue.use(Vuex); + + const store = new Vuex.Store({ + modules: { + diffs: createStore(), + }, + }); + + // Setup initial state + store.state.diffs.addedLines = 10; + store.state.diffs.removedLines = 20; + store.state.diffs.diffFiles.push('test'); + + vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, { store }); + }); + + afterEach(() => { + vm.$destroy(); + }); + + it('renders diff stats', () => { + expect(vm.$el.textContent).toContain('1 changed file'); + expect(vm.$el.textContent).toContain('10 additions'); + expect(vm.$el.textContent).toContain('20 deletions'); + }); + + it('renders empty text', () => { + expect(vm.$el.textContent).toContain('No files found'); + }); + + describe('with files', () => { + beforeEach(done => { + Object.assign(vm.$store.state.diffs.treeEntries, { + 'index.js': { + addedLines: 0, + changed: true, + deleted: false, + fileHash: 'test', + key: 'index.js', + name: 'index.js', + path: 'index.js', + removedLines: 0, + tempFile: true, + type: 'blob', + }, + app: { + key: 'app', + path: 'app', + name: 'app', + type: 'tree', + tree: [], + }, + }); + vm.$store.state.diffs.tree = [ + vm.$store.state.diffs.treeEntries['index.js'], + vm.$store.state.diffs.treeEntries.app, + ]; + + vm.$nextTick(done); + }); + + it('renders tree', () => { + expect(vm.$el.querySelectorAll('.file-row').length).toBe(2); + expect(vm.$el.querySelectorAll('.file-row')[0].textContent).toContain('index.js'); + expect(vm.$el.querySelectorAll('.file-row')[1].textContent).toContain('app'); + }); + + it('filters tree list to blobs matching search', done => { + vm.search = 'index'; + + vm.$nextTick(() => { + expect(vm.$el.querySelectorAll('.file-row').length).toBe(1); + expect(vm.$el.querySelectorAll('.file-row')[0].textContent).toContain('index.js'); + + done(); + }); + }); + + it('calls toggleTreeOpen when clicking folder', () => { + spyOn(vm.$store, 'dispatch').and.stub(); + + vm.$el.querySelectorAll('.file-row')[1].click(); + + expect(vm.$store.dispatch).toHaveBeenCalledWith('diffs/toggleTreeOpen', 'app'); + }); + + it('calls scrollToFile when clicking blob', () => { + spyOn(vm.$store, 'dispatch').and.stub(); + + vm.$el.querySelector('.file-row').click(); + + expect(vm.$store.dispatch).toHaveBeenCalledWith('diffs/scrollToFile', 'index.js'); + }); + }); + + describe('clearSearch', () => { + it('resets search', () => { + vm.search = 'test'; + + vm.$el.querySelector('.tree-list-clear-icon').click(); + + expect(vm.search).toBe(''); + }); + }); +}); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/diffs/mock_data/diff_discussions.js b/spec/javascripts/diffs/mock_data/diff_discussions.js index b29a22da7c2..0ad214ea4a4 100644 --- a/spec/javascripts/diffs/mock_data/diff_discussions.js +++ b/spec/javascripts/diffs/mock_data/diff_discussions.js @@ -2,15 +2,13 @@ export default { id: '6b232e05bea388c6b043ccc243ba505faac04ea8', reply_id: '6b232e05bea388c6b043ccc243ba505faac04ea8', position: { - formatter: { - old_line: null, - new_line: 2, - old_path: 'CHANGELOG', - new_path: 'CHANGELOG', - base_sha: 'e63f41fe459e62e1228fcef60d7189127aeba95a', - start_sha: 'd9eaefe5a676b820c57ff18cf5b68316025f7962', - head_sha: 'c48ee0d1bf3b30453f5b32250ce03134beaa6d13', - }, + old_line: null, + new_line: 2, + old_path: 'CHANGELOG', + new_path: 'CHANGELOG', + base_sha: 'e63f41fe459e62e1228fcef60d7189127aeba95a', + start_sha: 'd9eaefe5a676b820c57ff18cf5b68316025f7962', + head_sha: 'c48ee0d1bf3b30453f5b32250ce03134beaa6d13', }, line_code: '1c497fbb3a46b78edf04cc2a2fa33f67e3ffbe2a_1_2', expanded: true, diff --git a/spec/javascripts/diffs/mock_data/diff_file.js b/spec/javascripts/diffs/mock_data/diff_file.js index 372b8f066cf..2aa2f8f3528 100644 --- a/spec/javascripts/diffs/mock_data/diff_file.js +++ b/spec/javascripts/diffs/mock_data/diff_file.js @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ export default { contentSha: 'c48ee0d1bf3b30453f5b32250ce03134beaa6d13', storedExternally: null, externalStorage: null, - oldPathHtml: ['CHANGELOG', 'CHANGELOG'], + oldPathHtml: 'CHANGELOG', newPathHtml: 'CHANGELOG', editPath: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/edit/spooky-stuff/CHANGELOG', viewPath: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/blob/spooky-stuff/CHANGELOG', diff --git a/spec/javascripts/diffs/store/actions_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/diffs/store/actions_spec.js index 05b39bad6ea..85c1926fcb1 100644 --- a/spec/javascripts/diffs/store/actions_spec.js +++ b/spec/javascripts/diffs/store/actions_spec.js @@ -22,6 +22,9 @@ import actions, { expandAllFiles, toggleFileDiscussions, saveDiffDiscussion, + toggleTreeOpen, + scrollToFile, + toggleShowTreeList, } from '~/diffs/store/actions'; import * as types from '~/diffs/store/mutation_types'; import { reduceDiscussionsToLineCodes } from '~/notes/stores/utils'; @@ -145,12 +148,8 @@ describe('DiffsStoreActions', () => { }, fileHash: 'ABC', resolvable: true, - position: { - formatter: diffPosition, - }, - original_position: { - formatter: diffPosition, - }, + position: diffPosition, + original_position: diffPosition, }; const discussions = reduceDiscussionsToLineCodes([singleDiscussion]); @@ -175,6 +174,7 @@ describe('DiffsStoreActions', () => { oldLine: 5, oldPath: 'file2', lineCode: 'ABC_1_1', + positionType: 'text', }, }, }, @@ -608,4 +608,88 @@ describe('DiffsStoreActions', () => { .catch(done.fail); }); }); + + describe('toggleTreeOpen', () => { + it('commits TOGGLE_FOLDER_OPEN', done => { + testAction( + toggleTreeOpen, + 'path', + {}, + [{ type: types.TOGGLE_FOLDER_OPEN, payload: 'path' }], + [], + done, + ); + }); + }); + + describe('scrollToFile', () => { + let commit; + + beforeEach(() => { + commit = jasmine.createSpy(); + jasmine.clock().install(); + }); + + afterEach(() => { + jasmine.clock().uninstall(); + }); + + it('updates location hash', () => { + const state = { + treeEntries: { + path: { + fileHash: 'test', + }, + }, + }; + + scrollToFile({ state, commit }, 'path'); + + expect(document.location.hash).toBe('#test'); + }); + + it('commits UPDATE_CURRENT_DIFF_FILE_ID', () => { + const state = { + treeEntries: { + path: { + fileHash: 'test', + }, + }, + }; + + scrollToFile({ state, commit }, 'path'); + + expect(commit).toHaveBeenCalledWith(types.UPDATE_CURRENT_DIFF_FILE_ID, 'test'); + }); + + it('resets currentDiffId after timeout', () => { + const state = { + treeEntries: { + path: { + fileHash: 'test', + }, + }, + }; + + scrollToFile({ state, commit }, 'path'); + + jasmine.clock().tick(1000); + + expect(commit.calls.argsFor(1)).toEqual([types.UPDATE_CURRENT_DIFF_FILE_ID, '']); + }); + }); + + describe('toggleShowTreeList', () => { + it('commits toggle', done => { + testAction(toggleShowTreeList, null, {}, [{ type: types.TOGGLE_SHOW_TREE_LIST }], [], done); + }); + + it('updates localStorage', () => { + spyOn(localStorage, 'setItem'); + + toggleShowTreeList({ commit() {}, state: { showTreeList: true } }); + + expect(localStorage.setItem).toHaveBeenCalledWith('mr_tree_show', true); + }); + }); }); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/diffs/store/getters_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/diffs/store/getters_spec.js index 4747e437c4e..cfeaaec6980 100644 --- a/spec/javascripts/diffs/store/getters_spec.js +++ b/spec/javascripts/diffs/store/getters_spec.js @@ -291,4 +291,31 @@ describe('Diffs Module Getters', () => { expect(getters.getDiffFileByHash(localState)('123')).toBeUndefined(); }); }); + + describe('allBlobs', () => { + it('returns an array of blobs', () => { + localState.treeEntries = { + file: { + type: 'blob', + }, + tree: { + type: 'tree', + }, + }; + + expect(getters.allBlobs(localState)).toEqual([ + { + type: 'blob', + }, + ]); + }); + }); + + describe('diffFilesLength', () => { + it('returns length of diff files', () => { + localState.diffFiles.push('test', 'test 2'); + + expect(getters.diffFilesLength(localState)).toBe(2); + }); + }); }); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/diffs/store/mutations_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/diffs/store/mutations_spec.js index 9a5d8dfbd15..0b712055956 100644 --- a/spec/javascripts/diffs/store/mutations_spec.js +++ b/spec/javascripts/diffs/store/mutations_spec.js @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ +import createState from '~/diffs/store/modules/diff_state'; import mutations from '~/diffs/store/mutations'; import * as types from '~/diffs/store/mutation_types'; import { INLINE_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE } from '~/diffs/constants'; @@ -193,24 +194,16 @@ describe('DiffsStoreMutations', () => { line_code: 'ABC_1', diff_discussion: true, resolvable: true, - original_position: { - formatter: diffPosition, - }, - position: { - formatter: diffPosition, - }, + original_position: diffPosition, + position: diffPosition, }, { id: 2, line_code: 'ABC_1', diff_discussion: true, resolvable: true, - original_position: { - formatter: diffPosition, - }, - position: { - formatter: diffPosition, - }, + original_position: diffPosition, + position: diffPosition, }, ]; @@ -356,4 +349,44 @@ describe('DiffsStoreMutations', () => { expect(state.diffFiles[0].highlightedDiffLines[0].discussions.length).toEqual(0); }); }); + + describe('TOGGLE_FOLDER_OPEN', () => { + it('toggles entry opened prop', () => { + const state = { + treeEntries: { + path: { + opened: false, + }, + }, + }; + + mutations[types.TOGGLE_FOLDER_OPEN](state, 'path'); + + expect(state.treeEntries.path.opened).toBe(true); + }); + }); + + describe('TOGGLE_SHOW_TREE_LIST', () => { + it('toggles showTreeList', () => { + const state = createState(); + + mutations[types.TOGGLE_SHOW_TREE_LIST](state); + + expect(state.showTreeList).toBe(false, 'Failed to toggle showTreeList to false'); + + mutations[types.TOGGLE_SHOW_TREE_LIST](state); + + expect(state.showTreeList).toBe(true, 'Failed to toggle showTreeList to true'); + }); + }); + + describe('UPDATE_CURRENT_DIFF_FILE_ID', () => { + it('updates currentDiffFileId', () => { + const state = createState(); + + mutations[types.UPDATE_CURRENT_DIFF_FILE_ID](state, 'somefileid'); + + expect(state.currentDiffFileId).toBe('somefileid'); + }); + }); }); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/diffs/store/utils_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/diffs/store/utils_spec.js index 897cd1483aa..257270a91ec 100644 --- a/spec/javascripts/diffs/store/utils_spec.js +++ b/spec/javascripts/diffs/store/utils_spec.js @@ -333,20 +333,12 @@ describe('DiffsStoreUtils', () => { const discussions = { upToDateDiscussion1: { - original_position: { - formatter: diffPosition, - }, - position: { - formatter: wrongDiffPosition, - }, + original_position: diffPosition, + position: wrongDiffPosition, }, outDatedDiscussion1: { - original_position: { - formatter: wrongDiffPosition, - }, - position: { - formatter: wrongDiffPosition, - }, + original_position: wrongDiffPosition, + position: wrongDiffPosition, }, }; @@ -421,4 +413,113 @@ describe('DiffsStoreUtils', () => { ).toBe(false); }); }); + + describe('generateTreeList', () => { + let files; + + beforeAll(() => { + files = [ + { + newPath: 'app/index.js', + deletedFile: false, + newFile: false, + removedLines: 10, + addedLines: 0, + fileHash: 'test', + }, + { + newPath: 'app/test/index.js', + deletedFile: false, + newFile: true, + removedLines: 0, + addedLines: 0, + fileHash: 'test', + }, + { + newPath: 'package.json', + deletedFile: true, + newFile: false, + removedLines: 0, + addedLines: 0, + fileHash: 'test', + }, + ]; + }); + + it('creates a tree of files', () => { + const { tree } = utils.generateTreeList(files); + + expect(tree).toEqual([ + { + key: 'app', + path: 'app', + name: 'app', + type: 'tree', + tree: [ + { + addedLines: 0, + changed: true, + deleted: false, + fileHash: 'test', + key: 'app/index.js', + name: 'index.js', + path: 'app/index.js', + removedLines: 10, + tempFile: false, + type: 'blob', + tree: [], + }, + { + key: 'app/test', + path: 'app/test', + name: 'test', + type: 'tree', + opened: true, + tree: [ + { + addedLines: 0, + changed: true, + deleted: false, + fileHash: 'test', + key: 'app/test/index.js', + name: 'index.js', + path: 'app/test/index.js', + removedLines: 0, + tempFile: true, + type: 'blob', + tree: [], + }, + ], + }, + ], + opened: true, + }, + { + key: 'package.json', + path: 'package.json', + name: 'package.json', + type: 'blob', + changed: true, + tempFile: false, + deleted: true, + fileHash: 'test', + addedLines: 0, + removedLines: 0, + tree: [], + }, + ]); + }); + + it('creates flat list of blobs & folders', () => { + const { treeEntries } = utils.generateTreeList(files); + + expect(Object.keys(treeEntries)).toEqual([ + 'app', + 'app/index.js', + 'app/test', + 'app/test/index.js', + 'package.json', + ]); + }); + }); }); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_utils_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_utils_spec.js index 8792e99d461..68bbbf838da 100644 --- a/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_utils_spec.js +++ b/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_utils_spec.js @@ -288,13 +288,13 @@ describe('Dropdown Utils', () => { describe('setDataValueIfSelected', () => { beforeEach(() => { - spyOn(FilteredSearchDropdownManager, 'addWordToInput') - .and.callFake(() => {}); + spyOn(FilteredSearchDropdownManager, 'addWordToInput').and.callFake(() => {}); }); it('calls addWordToInput when dataValue exists', () => { const selected = { getAttribute: () => 'value', + hasAttribute: () => false, }; DropdownUtils.setDataValueIfSelected(null, selected); @@ -304,6 +304,7 @@ describe('Dropdown Utils', () => { it('returns true when dataValue exists', () => { const selected = { getAttribute: () => 'value', + hasAttribute: () => false, }; const result = DropdownUtils.setDataValueIfSelected(null, selected); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_visual_tokens_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_visual_tokens_spec.js index 756a654765b..53a6d1d62b0 100644 --- a/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_visual_tokens_spec.js +++ b/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_visual_tokens_spec.js @@ -240,13 +240,17 @@ describe('Filtered Search Visual Tokens', () => { beforeEach(() => { setFixtures(` <div class="test-area"> - ${subject.createVisualTokenElementHTML()} + ${subject.createVisualTokenElementHTML('custom-token')} </div> `); tokenElement = document.querySelector('.test-area').firstElementChild; }); + it('should add class name to token element', () => { + expect(document.querySelector('.test-area .custom-token')).toBeDefined(); + }); + it('contains name div', () => { expect(tokenElement.querySelector('.name')).toEqual(jasmine.anything()); }); @@ -280,7 +284,7 @@ describe('Filtered Search Visual Tokens', () => { describe('addVisualTokenElement', () => { it('renders search visual tokens', () => { - subject.addVisualTokenElement('search term', null, true); + subject.addVisualTokenElement('search term', null, { isSearchTerm: true }); const token = tokensContainer.querySelector('.js-visual-token'); expect(token.classList.contains('filtered-search-term')).toEqual(true); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/ide/components/file_row_extra_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/ide/components/file_row_extra_spec.js index 60dabe28045..c93a939ad71 100644 --- a/spec/javascripts/ide/components/file_row_extra_spec.js +++ b/spec/javascripts/ide/components/file_row_extra_spec.js @@ -107,14 +107,14 @@ describe('IDE extra file row component', () => { describe('changes file icon', () => { it('hides when file is not changed', () => { - expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.ide-file-changed-icon')).toBe(null); + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.file-changed-icon')).toBe(null); }); it('shows when file is changed', done => { vm.file.changed = true; vm.$nextTick(() => { - expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.ide-file-changed-icon')).not.toBe(null); + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.file-changed-icon')).not.toBe(null); done(); }); @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ describe('IDE extra file row component', () => { vm.file.staged = true; vm.$nextTick(() => { - expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.ide-file-changed-icon')).not.toBe(null); + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.file-changed-icon')).not.toBe(null); done(); }); @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ describe('IDE extra file row component', () => { vm.file.tempFile = true; vm.$nextTick(() => { - expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.ide-file-changed-icon')).not.toBe(null); + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.file-changed-icon')).not.toBe(null); done(); }); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/ide/components/ide_status_bar_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/ide/components/ide_status_bar_spec.js index 0e93c5193a1..47d6492a7a6 100644 --- a/spec/javascripts/ide/components/ide_status_bar_spec.js +++ b/spec/javascripts/ide/components/ide_status_bar_spec.js @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ import Vue from 'vue'; import store from '~/ide/stores'; import ideStatusBar from '~/ide/components/ide_status_bar.vue'; +import { rightSidebarViews } from '~/ide/constants'; import { createComponentWithStore } from 'spec/helpers/vue_mount_component_helper'; import { resetStore } from '../helpers'; import { projectData } from '../mock_data'; @@ -64,7 +65,7 @@ describe('ideStatusBar', () => { describe('pipeline status', () => { it('opens right sidebar on clicking icon', done => { - spyOn(vm, 'setRightPane'); + spyOn(vm, 'openRightPane'); Vue.set(vm.$store.state.pipelines, 'latestPipeline', { details: { status: { @@ -80,7 +81,7 @@ describe('ideStatusBar', () => { .then(() => { vm.$el.querySelector('.ide-status-pipeline button').click(); - expect(vm.setRightPane).toHaveBeenCalledWith('pipelines-list'); + expect(vm.openRightPane).toHaveBeenCalledWith(rightSidebarViews.pipelines); }) .then(done) .catch(done.fail); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/ide/components/panes/right_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/ide/components/panes/right_spec.js index c75975d2af6..4899f850cf4 100644 --- a/spec/javascripts/ide/components/panes/right_spec.js +++ b/spec/javascripts/ide/components/panes/right_spec.js @@ -25,7 +25,8 @@ describe('IDE right pane', () => { describe('active', () => { it('renders merge request button as active', done => { - vm.$store.state.rightPane = rightSidebarViews.mergeRequestInfo; + vm.$store.state.rightPane.isOpen = true; + vm.$store.state.rightPane.currentView = rightSidebarViews.mergeRequestInfo.name; vm.$store.state.currentMergeRequestId = '123'; vm.$store.state.currentProjectId = 'gitlab-ce'; vm.$store.state.currentMergeRequestId = 1; @@ -41,20 +42,21 @@ describe('IDE right pane', () => { }, }; - vm.$nextTick(() => { - expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.ide-sidebar-link.active')).not.toBe(null); - expect( - vm.$el.querySelector('.ide-sidebar-link.active').getAttribute('data-original-title'), - ).toBe('Merge Request'); - - done(); - }); + vm.$nextTick() + .then(() => { + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.ide-sidebar-link.active')).not.toBe(null); + expect( + vm.$el.querySelector('.ide-sidebar-link.active').getAttribute('data-original-title'), + ).toBe('Merge Request'); + }) + .then(done) + .catch(done.fail); }); }); describe('click', () => { beforeEach(() => { - spyOn(vm, 'setRightPane'); + spyOn(vm, 'open'); }); it('sets view to merge request', done => { @@ -63,7 +65,7 @@ describe('IDE right pane', () => { vm.$nextTick(() => { vm.$el.querySelector('.ide-sidebar-link').click(); - expect(vm.setRightPane).toHaveBeenCalledWith(rightSidebarViews.mergeRequestInfo); + expect(vm.open).toHaveBeenCalledWith(rightSidebarViews.mergeRequestInfo); done(); }); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/ide/components/repo_editor_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/ide/components/repo_editor_spec.js index 0e2e246defd..991fb750876 100644 --- a/spec/javascripts/ide/components/repo_editor_spec.js +++ b/spec/javascripts/ide/components/repo_editor_spec.js @@ -319,8 +319,8 @@ describe('RepoEditor', () => { }); }); - it('calls updateDimensions when rightPane is updated', done => { - vm.$store.state.rightPane = 'testing'; + it('calls updateDimensions when rightPane is opened', done => { + vm.$store.state.rightPane.isOpen = true; vm.$nextTick(() => { expect(vm.editor.updateDimensions).toHaveBeenCalled(); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/ide/components/repo_tab_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/ide/components/repo_tab_spec.js index 278a0753322..3b52f279bf2 100644 --- a/spec/javascripts/ide/components/repo_tab_spec.js +++ b/spec/javascripts/ide/components/repo_tab_spec.js @@ -93,13 +93,13 @@ describe('RepoTab', () => { Vue.nextTick() .then(() => { - expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.ide-file-modified')).toBeNull(); + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.file-modified')).toBeNull(); vm.$el.dispatchEvent(new Event('mouseout')); }) .then(Vue.nextTick) .then(() => { - expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.ide-file-modified')).not.toBeNull(); + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.file-modified')).not.toBeNull(); done(); }) diff --git a/spec/javascripts/ide/helpers.js b/spec/javascripts/ide/helpers.js index 3ce9c9fcda1..7e107747346 100644 --- a/spec/javascripts/ide/helpers.js +++ b/spec/javascripts/ide/helpers.js @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ import mergeRequestsState from '~/ide/stores/modules/merge_requests/state'; import pipelinesState from '~/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/state'; import branchesState from '~/ide/stores/modules/branches/state'; import fileTemplatesState from '~/ide/stores/modules/file_templates/state'; +import paneState from '~/ide/stores/modules/pane/state'; export const resetStore = store => { const newState = { @@ -15,6 +16,7 @@ export const resetStore = store => { pipelines: pipelinesState(), branches: branchesState(), fileTemplates: fileTemplatesState(), + rightPane: paneState(), }; store.replaceState(newState); }; diff --git a/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/file_templates/actions_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/file_templates/actions_spec.js index c29dd9f0d06..734233100ab 100644 --- a/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/file_templates/actions_spec.js +++ b/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/file_templates/actions_spec.js @@ -69,11 +69,17 @@ describe('IDE file templates actions', () => { describe('fetchTemplateTypes', () => { describe('success', () => { + let nextPage; + beforeEach(() => { - mock.onGet(/api\/(.*)\/templates\/licenses/).replyOnce(200, [ - { - name: 'MIT', - }, + mock.onGet(/api\/(.*)\/templates\/licenses/).replyOnce(() => [ + 200, + [ + { + name: 'MIT', + }, + ], + { 'X-NEXT-PAGE': nextPage }, ]); }); @@ -116,6 +122,38 @@ describe('IDE file templates actions', () => { done, ); }); + + it('dispatches actions for next page', done => { + nextPage = '2'; + state.selectedTemplateType = { + key: 'licenses', + }; + + testAction( + actions.fetchTemplateTypes, + null, + state, + [], + [ + { + type: 'requestTemplateTypes', + }, + { + type: 'receiveTemplateTypesSuccess', + payload: [ + { + name: 'MIT', + }, + ], + }, + { + type: 'fetchTemplateTypes', + payload: 2, + }, + ], + done, + ); + }); }); describe('error', () => { diff --git a/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pane/actions_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pane/actions_spec.js new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f150ded6df5 --- /dev/null +++ b/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pane/actions_spec.js @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ +import * as actions from '~/ide/stores/modules/pane/actions'; +import * as types from '~/ide/stores/modules/pane/mutation_types'; +import testAction from 'spec/helpers/vuex_action_helper'; + +describe('IDE pane module actions', () => { + const TEST_VIEW = { name: 'test' }; + const TEST_VIEW_KEEP_ALIVE = { name: 'test-keep-alive', keepAlive: true }; + + describe('toggleOpen', () => { + it('dispatches open if closed', done => { + testAction( + actions.toggleOpen, + TEST_VIEW, + { isOpen: false }, + [], + [{ type: 'open', payload: TEST_VIEW }], + done, + ); + }); + + it('dispatches close if opened', done => { + testAction( + actions.toggleOpen, + TEST_VIEW, + { isOpen: true }, + [], + [{ type: 'close' }], + done, + ); + }); + }); + + describe('open', () => { + it('commits SET_OPEN', done => { + testAction( + actions.open, + null, + {}, + [{ type: types.SET_OPEN, payload: true }], + [], + done, + ); + }); + + it('commits SET_CURRENT_VIEW if view is given', done => { + testAction( + actions.open, + TEST_VIEW, + {}, + [ + { type: types.SET_OPEN, payload: true }, + { type: types.SET_CURRENT_VIEW, payload: TEST_VIEW.name }, + ], + [], + done, + ); + }); + + it('commits KEEP_ALIVE_VIEW if keepAlive is true', done => { + testAction( + actions.open, + TEST_VIEW_KEEP_ALIVE, + {}, + [ + { type: types.SET_OPEN, payload: true }, + { type: types.SET_CURRENT_VIEW, payload: TEST_VIEW_KEEP_ALIVE.name }, + { type: types.KEEP_ALIVE_VIEW, payload: TEST_VIEW_KEEP_ALIVE.name }, + ], + [], + done, + ); + }); + }); + + describe('close', () => { + it('commits SET_OPEN', done => { + testAction( + actions.close, + null, + {}, + [{ type: types.SET_OPEN, payload: false }], + [], + done, + ); + }); + }); +}); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pane/getters_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pane/getters_spec.js new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2060863b5d6 --- /dev/null +++ b/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pane/getters_spec.js @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +import * as getters from '~/ide/stores/modules/pane/getters'; +import state from '~/ide/stores/modules/pane/state'; + +describe('IDE pane module getters', () => { + const TEST_VIEW = 'test-view'; + const TEST_KEEP_ALIVE_VIEWS = { + [TEST_VIEW]: true, + }; + + describe('isActiveView', () => { + it('returns true if given view matches currentView', () => { + const result = getters.isActiveView({ currentView: 'A' })('A'); + + expect(result).toBe(true); + }); + + it('returns false if given view does not match currentView', () => { + const result = getters.isActiveView({ currentView: 'A' })('B'); + + expect(result).toBe(false); + }); + }); + + describe('isAliveView', () => { + it('returns true if given view is in keepAliveViews', () => { + const result = getters.isAliveView( + { keepAliveViews: TEST_KEEP_ALIVE_VIEWS }, + {}, + )(TEST_VIEW); + + expect(result).toBe(true); + }); + + it('returns true if given view is active view and open', () => { + const result = getters.isAliveView( + { ...state(), isOpen: true }, + { isActiveView: () => true }, + )(TEST_VIEW); + + expect(result).toBe(true); + }); + + it('returns false if given view is active view and closed', () => { + const result = getters.isAliveView( + state(), + { isActiveView: () => true }, + )(TEST_VIEW); + + expect(result).toBe(false); + }); + + it('returns false if given view is not activeView', () => { + const result = getters.isAliveView( + { ...state(), isOpen: true }, + { isActiveView: () => false }, + )(TEST_VIEW); + + expect(result).toBe(false); + }); + }); +}); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pane/mutations_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pane/mutations_spec.js new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b5fcd35912e --- /dev/null +++ b/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pane/mutations_spec.js @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ +import state from '~/ide/stores/modules/pane/state'; +import mutations from '~/ide/stores/modules/pane/mutations'; +import * as types from '~/ide/stores/modules/pane/mutation_types'; + +describe('IDE pane module mutations', () => { + const TEST_VIEW = 'test-view'; + let mockedState; + + beforeEach(() => { + mockedState = state(); + }); + + describe('SET_OPEN', () => { + it('sets isOpen', () => { + mockedState.isOpen = false; + + mutations[types.SET_OPEN](mockedState, true); + + expect(mockedState.isOpen).toBe(true); + }); + }); + + describe('SET_CURRENT_VIEW', () => { + it('sets currentView', () => { + mockedState.currentView = null; + + mutations[types.SET_CURRENT_VIEW](mockedState, TEST_VIEW); + + expect(mockedState.currentView).toEqual(TEST_VIEW); + }); + }); + + describe('KEEP_ALIVE_VIEW', () => { + it('adds entry to keepAliveViews', () => { + mutations[types.KEEP_ALIVE_VIEW](mockedState, TEST_VIEW); + + expect(mockedState.keepAliveViews).toEqual({ + [TEST_VIEW]: true, + }); + }); + }); +}); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/actions_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/actions_spec.js index 91edb388791..d85354c3681 100644 --- a/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/actions_spec.js +++ b/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/actions_spec.js @@ -315,29 +315,29 @@ describe('IDE pipelines actions', () => { 'job', mockedState, [{ type: types.SET_DETAIL_JOB, payload: 'job' }], - [{ type: 'setRightPane', payload: 'jobs-detail' }], + [{ type: 'rightPane/open', payload: rightSidebarViews.jobsDetail }], done, ); }); - it('dispatches setRightPane as pipeline when job is null', done => { + it('dispatches rightPane/open as pipeline when job is null', done => { testAction( setDetailJob, null, mockedState, [{ type: types.SET_DETAIL_JOB, payload: null }], - [{ type: 'setRightPane', payload: rightSidebarViews.pipelines }], + [{ type: 'rightPane/open', payload: rightSidebarViews.pipelines }], done, ); }); - it('dispatches setRightPane as job', done => { + it('dispatches rightPane/open as job', done => { testAction( setDetailJob, 'job', mockedState, [{ type: types.SET_DETAIL_JOB, payload: 'job' }], - [{ type: 'setRightPane', payload: rightSidebarViews.jobsDetail }], + [{ type: 'rightPane/open', payload: rightSidebarViews.jobsDetail }], done, ); }); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/issue_show/index_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/issue_show/index_spec.js new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fa0b426c06c --- /dev/null +++ b/spec/javascripts/issue_show/index_spec.js @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +import initIssueableApp from '~/issue_show'; + +describe('Issue show index', () => { + describe('initIssueableApp', () => { + it('should initialize app with no potential XSS attack', () => { + const d = document.createElement('div'); + d.id = 'js-issuable-app-initial-data'; + d.innerHTML = JSON.stringify({ + initialDescriptionHtml: '<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>', + }); + document.body.appendChild(d); + + const alertSpy = spyOn(window, 'alert'); + initIssueableApp(); + + expect(alertSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); + }); + }); +}); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/job_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/job_spec.js index 2fcb5566ebc..d6b5dec9e47 100644 --- a/spec/javascripts/job_spec.js +++ b/spec/javascripts/job_spec.js @@ -57,25 +57,6 @@ describe('Job', () => { expect(job.buildStage).toBe('test'); expect(job.state).toBe(''); }); - - it('only shows the jobs matching the current stage', () => { - expect($('.build-job[data-stage="build"]').is(':visible')).toBe(false); - expect($('.build-job[data-stage="test"]').is(':visible')).toBe(true); - expect($('.build-job[data-stage="deploy"]').is(':visible')).toBe(false); - }); - - it('selects the current stage in the build dropdown menu', () => { - expect($('.stage-selection').text()).toBe('test'); - }); - - it('updates the jobs when the build dropdown changes', () => { - $('.stage-item:contains("build")').click(); - - expect($('.stage-selection').text()).toBe('build'); - expect($('.build-job[data-stage="build"]').is(':visible')).toBe(true); - expect($('.build-job[data-stage="test"]').is(':visible')).toBe(false); - expect($('.build-job[data-stage="deploy"]').is(':visible')).toBe(false); - }); }); describe('running build', () => { diff --git a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/commit_block_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/commit_block_spec.js index 61ee993f46a..0bcc4ff940f 100644 --- a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/commit_block_spec.js +++ b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/commit_block_spec.js @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ describe('Commit block', () => { props.mergeRequest.path, ); expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-link-commit').textContent.trim()).toEqual( - props.mergeRequest.iid, + `!${props.mergeRequest.iid}`, ); }); }); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/empty_state_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/empty_state_spec.js index 872cc1e3864..73488eaab9b 100644 --- a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/empty_state_spec.js +++ b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/empty_state_spec.js @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ describe('Empty State', () => { content, action: { path: 'runner', - title: 'Check runner', + button_title: 'Check runner', method: 'post', }, }); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/environments_block_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/environments_block_spec.js index 015c26be9fc..7d836129b13 100644 --- a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/environments_block_spec.js +++ b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/environments_block_spec.js @@ -5,19 +5,16 @@ import mountComponent from '../../helpers/vue_mount_component_helper'; describe('Environments block', () => { const Component = Vue.extend(component); let vm; - const icon = { + const status = { group: 'success', icon: 'status_success', label: 'passed', text: 'passed', tooltip: 'passed', }; - const deployment = { - path: 'deployment', - name: 'deployment name', - }; + const environment = { - path: '/environment', + environment_path: '/environment', name: 'environment', }; @@ -25,15 +22,14 @@ describe('Environments block', () => { vm.$destroy(); }); - describe('with latest deployment', () => { + describe('with last deployment', () => { it('renders info for most recent deployment', () => { vm = mountComponent(Component, { deploymentStatus: { - status: 'latest', - icon, - deployment, + status: 'last', environment, }, + iconStatus: status, }); expect(vm.$el.textContent.trim()).toEqual( @@ -48,17 +44,17 @@ describe('Environments block', () => { vm = mountComponent(Component, { deploymentStatus: { status: 'out_of_date', - icon, - deployment, environment: Object.assign({}, environment, { - last_deployment: { name: 'deployment', path: 'last_deployment' }, + last_deployment: { iid: 'deployment', deployable: { build_path: 'bar' } }, }), }, + iconStatus: status, }); expect(vm.$el.textContent.trim()).toEqual( - 'This job is an out-of-date deployment to environment. View the most recent deployment deployment.', + 'This job is an out-of-date deployment to environment. View the most recent deployment #deployment.', ); + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-deployment-link').getAttribute('href')).toEqual('bar'); }); }); @@ -67,10 +63,9 @@ describe('Environments block', () => { vm = mountComponent(Component, { deploymentStatus: { status: 'out_of_date', - icon, - deployment: null, environment, }, + iconStatus: status, }); expect(vm.$el.textContent.trim()).toEqual( @@ -85,10 +80,9 @@ describe('Environments block', () => { vm = mountComponent(Component, { deploymentStatus: { status: 'failed', - icon, - deployment: null, environment, }, + iconStatus: status, }); expect(vm.$el.textContent.trim()).toEqual( @@ -99,21 +93,24 @@ describe('Environments block', () => { describe('creating deployment', () => { describe('with last deployment', () => { - it('renders info about creating deployment and overriding lastest deployment', () => { + it('renders info about creating deployment and overriding latest deployment', () => { vm = mountComponent(Component, { deploymentStatus: { status: 'creating', - icon, - deployment, environment: Object.assign({}, environment, { - last_deployment: { name: 'deployment', path: 'last_deployment' }, + last_deployment: { + iid: 'deployment', + deployable: { build_path: 'foo' }, + }, }), }, + iconStatus: status, }); expect(vm.$el.textContent.trim()).toEqual( - 'This job is creating a deployment to environment and will overwrite the last deployment.', + 'This job is creating a deployment to environment and will overwrite the latest deployment.', ); + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-deployment-link').getAttribute('href')).toEqual('foo'); }); }); @@ -122,10 +119,9 @@ describe('Environments block', () => { vm = mountComponent(Component, { deploymentStatus: { status: 'creating', - icon, - deployment: null, environment, }, + iconStatus: status, }); expect(vm.$el.textContent.trim()).toEqual( @@ -133,5 +129,18 @@ describe('Environments block', () => { ); }); }); + + describe('without environment', () => { + it('does not render environment link', () => { + vm = mountComponent(Component, { + deploymentStatus: { + status: 'creating', + environment: null, + }, + iconStatus: status, + }); + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-environment-link')).toBeNull(); + }); + }); }); }); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/header_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/header_spec.js deleted file mode 100644 index e21e2c6d6e3..00000000000 --- a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/header_spec.js +++ /dev/null @@ -1,98 +0,0 @@ -import Vue from 'vue'; -import headerComponent from '~/jobs/components/header.vue'; -import mountComponent from 'spec/helpers/vue_mount_component_helper'; - -describe('Job details header', () => { - let HeaderComponent; - let vm; - let props; - - beforeEach(() => { - HeaderComponent = Vue.extend(headerComponent); - - const threeWeeksAgo = new Date(); - threeWeeksAgo.setDate(threeWeeksAgo.getDate() - 21); - - const twoDaysAgo = new Date(); - twoDaysAgo.setDate(twoDaysAgo.getDate() - 2); - - props = { - job: { - status: { - group: 'failed', - icon: 'status_failed', - label: 'failed', - text: 'failed', - details_path: 'path', - }, - id: 123, - created_at: threeWeeksAgo.toISOString(), - user: { - web_url: 'path', - name: 'Foo', - username: 'foobar', - email: 'foo@bar.com', - avatar_url: 'link', - }, - started: twoDaysAgo.toISOString(), - new_issue_path: 'path', - }, - isLoading: false, - }; - }); - - afterEach(() => { - vm.$destroy(); - }); - - describe('job reason', () => { - it('should not render the reason when reason is absent', () => { - vm = mountComponent(HeaderComponent, props); - - expect(vm.shouldRenderReason).toBe(false); - }); - - it('should render the reason when reason is present', () => { - props.job.callout_message = 'There is an unknown failure, please try again'; - - vm = mountComponent(HeaderComponent, props); - - expect(vm.shouldRenderReason).toBe(true); - }); - }); - - describe('triggered job', () => { - beforeEach(() => { - vm = mountComponent(HeaderComponent, props); - }); - - it('should render provided job information', () => { - expect( - vm.$el - .querySelector('.header-main-content') - .textContent.replace(/\s+/g, ' ') - .trim(), - ).toEqual('failed Job #123 triggered 2 days ago by Foo'); - }); - - it('should render new issue link', () => { - expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-new-issue').getAttribute('href')).toEqual( - props.job.new_issue_path, - ); - }); - }); - - describe('created job', () => { - it('should render created key', () => { - props.job.started = false; - vm = mountComponent(HeaderComponent, props); - - expect( - vm.$el - .querySelector('.header-main-content') - .textContent.replace(/\s+/g, ' ') - .trim(), - ).toEqual('failed Job #123 created 3 weeks ago by Foo'); - }); - }); -}); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/job_app_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/job_app_spec.js new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e02eb9723fe --- /dev/null +++ b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/job_app_spec.js @@ -0,0 +1,324 @@ +import Vue from 'vue'; +import jobApp from '~/jobs/components/job_app.vue'; +import createStore from '~/jobs/store'; +import { mountComponentWithStore } from 'spec/helpers/vue_mount_component_helper'; + +describe('Job App ', () => { + const Component = Vue.extend(jobApp); + let store; + let vm; + + const threeWeeksAgo = new Date(); + threeWeeksAgo.setDate(threeWeeksAgo.getDate() - 21); + + const twoDaysAgo = new Date(); + twoDaysAgo.setDate(twoDaysAgo.getDate() - 2); + + const job = { + status: { + group: 'failed', + icon: 'status_failed', + label: 'failed', + text: 'failed', + details_path: 'path', + }, + id: 123, + created_at: threeWeeksAgo.toISOString(), + user: { + web_url: 'path', + name: 'Foo', + username: 'foobar', + email: 'foo@bar.com', + avatar_url: 'link', + }, + started: twoDaysAgo.toISOString(), + new_issue_path: 'path', + runners: { + available: false, + }, + tags: ['docker'], + has_trace: true, + }; + + const props = { + runnerHelpUrl: 'help/runners', + }; + + beforeEach(() => { + store = createStore(); + }); + + afterEach(() => { + vm.$destroy(); + }); + + describe('Header section', () => { + describe('job callout message', () => { + it('should not render the reason when reason is absent', () => { + store.dispatch('receiveJobSuccess', job); + + vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, { + props, + store, + }); + + expect(vm.shouldRenderCalloutMessage).toBe(false); + }); + + it('should render the reason when reason is present', () => { + store.dispatch( + 'receiveJobSuccess', + Object.assign({}, job, { + callout_message: 'There is an unknown failure, please try again', + }), + ); + + vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, { + props, + store, + }); + + expect(vm.shouldRenderCalloutMessage).toBe(true); + }); + }); + + describe('triggered job', () => { + beforeEach(() => { + store.dispatch('receiveJobSuccess', job); + + vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, { + props, + store, + }); + }); + + it('should render provided job information', () => { + expect( + vm.$el + .querySelector('.header-main-content') + .textContent.replace(/\s+/g, ' ') + .trim(), + ).toEqual('failed Job #123 triggered 2 days ago by Foo'); + }); + + it('should render new issue link', () => { + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-new-issue').getAttribute('href')).toEqual( + job.new_issue_path, + ); + }); + }); + + describe('created job', () => { + it('should render created key', () => { + store.dispatch('receiveJobSuccess', Object.assign({}, job, { started: false })); + + vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, { + props, + store, + }); + + expect( + vm.$el + .querySelector('.header-main-content') + .textContent.replace(/\s+/g, ' ') + .trim(), + ).toEqual('failed Job #123 created 3 weeks ago by Foo'); + }); + }); + }); + + describe('stuck block', () => { + it('renders stuck block when there are no runners', () => { + store.dispatch( + 'receiveJobSuccess', + Object.assign({}, job, { + status: { + group: 'pending', + icon: 'status_pending', + label: 'pending', + text: 'pending', + details_path: 'path', + }, + }), + ); + + vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, { + props, + store, + }); + + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-stuck')).not.toBeNull(); + }); + + it('renders tags in stuck block when there are no runners', () => { + store.dispatch( + 'receiveJobSuccess', + Object.assign({}, job, { + status: { + group: 'pending', + icon: 'status_pending', + label: 'pending', + text: 'pending', + details_path: 'path', + }, + }), + ); + + vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, { + props, + store, + }); + + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-stuck').textContent).toContain(job.tags[0]); + }); + + it(' does not renders stuck block when there are no runners', () => { + store.dispatch('receiveJobSuccess', Object.assign({}, job, { runners: { available: true } })); + + vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, { + props, + store, + }); + + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-stuck')).toBeNull(); + }); + }); + + describe('environments block', () => { + it('renders environment block when job has environment', () => { + store.dispatch( + 'receiveJobSuccess', + Object.assign({}, job, { + deployment_status: { + environment: { + environment_path: '/path', + name: 'foo', + }, + }, + }), + ); + + vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, { + props, + store, + }); + + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-environment')).not.toBeNull(); + }); + + it('does not render environment block when job has environment', () => { + store.dispatch('receiveJobSuccess', job); + + vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, { + props, + store, + }); + + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-environment')).toBeNull(); + }); + }); + + describe('erased block', () => { + it('renders erased block when `erased` is true', () => { + store.dispatch( + 'receiveJobSuccess', + Object.assign({}, job, { + erased: true, + erased_by: { + username: 'root', + web_url: 'gitlab.com/root', + }, + erased_at: '2016-11-07T11:11:16.525Z', + }), + ); + + vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, { + props, + store, + }); + + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-erased')).not.toBeNull(); + }); + + it('does not render erased block when `erased` is false', () => { + store.dispatch('receiveJobSuccess', Object.assign({}, job, { erased: false })); + + vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, { + props, + store, + }); + + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-erased')).toBeNull(); + }); + }); + + describe('empty states block', () => { + it('renders empty state when job does not have trace and is not running', () => { + store.dispatch( + 'receiveJobSuccess', + Object.assign({}, job, { + has_trace: false, + status: { + group: 'pending', + icon: 'status_pending', + label: 'pending', + text: 'pending', + details_path: 'path', + illustration: { + image: 'path', + size: '340', + title: 'Empty State', + content: 'This is an empty state', + }, + action: { + button_title: 'Retry job', + method: 'post', + path: '/path', + }, + }, + }), + ); + + vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, { + props, + store, + }); + + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-empty-state')).not.toBeNull(); + }); + + it('does not render empty state when job does not have trace but it is running', () => { + store.dispatch( + 'receiveJobSuccess', + Object.assign({}, job, { + has_trace: false, + status: { + group: 'running', + icon: 'status_running', + label: 'running', + text: 'running', + details_path: 'path', + }, + }), + ); + + vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, { + props, + store, + }); + + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-empty-state')).toBeNull(); + }); + + it('does not render empty state when job has trace but it is not running', () => { + store.dispatch('receiveJobSuccess', Object.assign({}, job, { has_trace: true })); + + vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, { + props, + store, + }); + + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-empty-state')).toBeNull(); + }); + }); +}); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/jobs_container_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/jobs_container_spec.js index f3f8ff0d031..fa3a2c4c266 100644 --- a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/jobs_container_spec.js +++ b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/jobs_container_spec.js @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ import Vue from 'vue'; import component from '~/jobs/components/jobs_container.vue'; import mountComponent from '../../helpers/vue_mount_component_helper'; -describe('Artifacts block', () => { +describe('Jobs List block', () => { const Component = Vue.extend(component); let vm; @@ -16,8 +16,7 @@ describe('Artifacts block', () => { text: 'passed', tooltip: 'passed', }, - path: 'job/233432756', - id: '233432756', + id: 233432756, tooltip: 'build - passed', retried: true, }; @@ -33,8 +32,7 @@ describe('Artifacts block', () => { text: 'passed', tooltip: 'passed', }, - path: 'job/2322756', - id: '2322756', + id: 2322756, tooltip: 'build - passed', active: true, }; @@ -50,8 +48,7 @@ describe('Artifacts block', () => { text: 'passed', tooltip: 'passed', }, - path: 'job/232153', - id: '232153', + id: 232153, tooltip: 'build - passed', }; @@ -62,14 +59,16 @@ describe('Artifacts block', () => { it('renders list of jobs', () => { vm = mountComponent(Component, { jobs: [job, retried, active], + jobId: 12313, }); expect(vm.$el.querySelectorAll('a').length).toEqual(3); }); - it('renders arrow right when job is active', () => { + it('renders arrow right when job id matches `jobId`', () => { vm = mountComponent(Component, { jobs: [active], + jobId: active.id, }); expect(vm.$el.querySelector('a .js-arrow-right')).not.toBeNull(); @@ -78,6 +77,7 @@ describe('Artifacts block', () => { it('does not render arrow right when job is not active', () => { vm = mountComponent(Component, { jobs: [job], + jobId: active.id, }); expect(vm.$el.querySelector('a .js-arrow-right')).toBeNull(); @@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ describe('Artifacts block', () => { it('renders job name when present', () => { vm = mountComponent(Component, { jobs: [job], + jobId: active.id, }); expect(vm.$el.querySelector('a').textContent.trim()).toContain(job.name); @@ -95,6 +96,7 @@ describe('Artifacts block', () => { it('renders job id when job name is not available', () => { vm = mountComponent(Component, { jobs: [retried], + jobId: active.id, }); expect(vm.$el.querySelector('a').textContent.trim()).toContain(retried.id); @@ -103,14 +105,16 @@ describe('Artifacts block', () => { it('links to the job page', () => { vm = mountComponent(Component, { jobs: [job], + jobId: active.id, }); - expect(vm.$el.querySelector('a').getAttribute('href')).toEqual(job.path); + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('a').getAttribute('href')).toEqual(job.status.details_path); }); it('renders retry icon when job was retried', () => { vm = mountComponent(Component, { jobs: [retried], + jobId: active.id, }); expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-retry-icon')).not.toBeNull(); @@ -119,6 +123,7 @@ describe('Artifacts block', () => { it('does not render retry icon when job was not retried', () => { vm = mountComponent(Component, { jobs: [job], + jobId: active.id, }); expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-retry-icon')).toBeNull(); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/sidebar_details_block_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/sidebar_details_block_spec.js deleted file mode 100644 index ba19534dac2..00000000000 --- a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/sidebar_details_block_spec.js +++ /dev/null @@ -1,139 +0,0 @@ -import Vue from 'vue'; -import sidebarDetailsBlock from '~/jobs/components/sidebar_details_block.vue'; -import job from '../mock_data'; -import mountComponent from '../../helpers/vue_mount_component_helper'; - -describe('Sidebar details block', () => { - let SidebarComponent; - let vm; - - function trimWhitespace(element) { - return element.textContent.replace(/\s+/g, ' ').trim(); - } - - beforeEach(() => { - SidebarComponent = Vue.extend(sidebarDetailsBlock); - }); - - afterEach(() => { - vm.$destroy(); - }); - - describe('when it is loading', () => { - it('should render a loading spinner', () => { - vm = mountComponent(SidebarComponent, { - job: {}, - isLoading: true, - }); - expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.fa-spinner')).toBeDefined(); - }); - }); - - describe('when there is no retry path retry', () => { - it('should not render a retry button', () => { - vm = mountComponent(SidebarComponent, { - job: {}, - isLoading: false, - }); - - expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-retry-job')).toBeNull(); - }); - }); - - describe('without terminal path', () => { - it('does not render terminal link', () => { - vm = mountComponent(SidebarComponent, { - job, - isLoading: false, - }); - - expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-terminal-link')).toBeNull(); - }); - }); - - describe('with terminal path', () => { - it('renders terminal link', () => { - vm = mountComponent(SidebarComponent, { - job, - isLoading: false, - terminalPath: 'job/43123/terminal', - }); - - expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-terminal-link')).not.toBeNull(); - }); - }); - - beforeEach(() => { - vm = mountComponent(SidebarComponent, { - job, - isLoading: false, - }); - }); - - describe('actions', () => { - it('should render link to new issue', () => { - expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-new-issue').getAttribute('href')).toEqual( - job.new_issue_path, - ); - expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-new-issue').textContent.trim()).toEqual('New issue'); - }); - - it('should render link to retry job', () => { - expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-retry-job').getAttribute('href')).toEqual(job.retry_path); - }); - - it('should render link to cancel job', () => { - expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-cancel-job').getAttribute('href')).toEqual(job.cancel_path); - }); - }); - - describe('information', () => { - it('should render merge request link', () => { - expect(trimWhitespace(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-mr'))).toEqual('Merge Request: !2'); - - expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-mr a').getAttribute('href')).toEqual( - job.merge_request.path, - ); - }); - - it('should render job duration', () => { - expect(trimWhitespace(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-duration'))).toEqual( - 'Duration: 6 seconds', - ); - }); - - it('should render erased date', () => { - expect(trimWhitespace(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-erased'))).toEqual('Erased: 3 weeks ago'); - }); - - it('should render finished date', () => { - expect(trimWhitespace(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-finished'))).toEqual( - 'Finished: 3 weeks ago', - ); - }); - - it('should render queued date', () => { - expect(trimWhitespace(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-queued'))).toEqual('Queued: 9 seconds'); - }); - - it('should render runner ID', () => { - expect(trimWhitespace(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-runner'))).toEqual( - 'Runner: local ci runner (#1)', - ); - }); - - it('should render timeout information', () => { - expect(trimWhitespace(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-timeout'))).toEqual( - 'Timeout: 1m 40s (from runner)', - ); - }); - - it('should render coverage', () => { - expect(trimWhitespace(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-coverage'))).toEqual('Coverage: 20%'); - }); - - it('should render tags', () => { - expect(trimWhitespace(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-tags'))).toEqual('Tags: tag'); - }); - }); -}); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/sidebar_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/sidebar_spec.js new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2f5c4245ced --- /dev/null +++ b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/sidebar_spec.js @@ -0,0 +1,196 @@ +import Vue from 'vue'; +import sidebarDetailsBlock from '~/jobs/components/sidebar.vue'; +import createStore from '~/jobs/store'; +import job, { stages, jobsInStage } from '../mock_data'; +import { mountComponentWithStore } from '../../helpers/vue_mount_component_helper'; +import { trimText } from '../../helpers/vue_component_helper'; + +describe('Sidebar details block', () => { + const SidebarComponent = Vue.extend(sidebarDetailsBlock); + let vm; + let store; + + beforeEach(() => { + store = createStore(); + }); + + afterEach(() => { + vm.$destroy(); + }); + + describe('when it is loading', () => { + it('should render a loading spinner', () => { + store.dispatch('requestJob'); + vm = mountComponentWithStore(SidebarComponent, { store }); + + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.fa-spinner')).toBeDefined(); + }); + }); + + describe('when there is no retry path retry', () => { + it('should not render a retry button', () => { + const copy = Object.assign({}, job); + delete copy.retry_path; + + store.dispatch('receiveJobSuccess', copy); + vm = mountComponentWithStore(SidebarComponent, { + store, + }); + + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-retry-job')).toBeNull(); + }); + }); + + describe('without terminal path', () => { + it('does not render terminal link', () => { + store.dispatch('receiveJobSuccess', job); + vm = mountComponentWithStore(SidebarComponent, { store }); + + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-terminal-link')).toBeNull(); + }); + }); + + describe('with terminal path', () => { + it('renders terminal link', () => { + store.dispatch('receiveJobSuccess', job); + vm = mountComponentWithStore(SidebarComponent, { + store, + props: { + terminalPath: 'job/43123/terminal', + }, + }); + + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-terminal-link')).not.toBeNull(); + }); + }); + + beforeEach(() => { + store.dispatch('receiveJobSuccess', job); + vm = mountComponentWithStore(SidebarComponent, { store }); + }); + + describe('actions', () => { + it('should render link to new issue', () => { + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-new-issue').getAttribute('href')).toEqual( + job.new_issue_path, + ); + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-new-issue').textContent.trim()).toEqual('New issue'); + }); + + it('should render link to retry job', () => { + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-retry-job').getAttribute('href')).toEqual(job.retry_path); + }); + + it('should render link to cancel job', () => { + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-cancel-job').getAttribute('href')).toEqual(job.cancel_path); + }); + }); + + describe('information', () => { + it('should render merge request link', () => { + expect(trimText(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-mr').textContent)).toEqual('Merge Request: !2'); + + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-mr a').getAttribute('href')).toEqual( + job.merge_request.path, + ); + }); + + it('should render job duration', () => { + expect(trimText(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-duration').textContent)).toEqual( + 'Duration: 6 seconds', + ); + }); + + it('should render erased date', () => { + expect(trimText(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-erased').textContent)).toEqual( + 'Erased: 3 weeks ago', + ); + }); + + it('should render finished date', () => { + expect(trimText(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-finished').textContent)).toEqual( + 'Finished: 3 weeks ago', + ); + }); + + it('should render queued date', () => { + expect(trimText(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-queued').textContent)).toEqual( + 'Queued: 9 seconds', + ); + }); + + it('should render runner ID', () => { + expect(trimText(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-runner').textContent)).toEqual( + 'Runner: local ci runner (#1)', + ); + }); + + it('should render timeout information', () => { + expect(trimText(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-timeout').textContent)).toEqual( + 'Timeout: 1m 40s (from runner)', + ); + }); + + it('should render coverage', () => { + expect(trimText(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-coverage').textContent)).toEqual( + 'Coverage: 20%', + ); + }); + + it('should render tags', () => { + expect(trimText(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-tags').textContent)).toEqual('Tags: tag'); + }); + }); + + describe('stages dropdown', () => { + beforeEach(() => { + store.dispatch('receiveJobSuccess', job); + }); + + describe('while fetching stages', () => { + it('renders dropdown with More label', () => { + vm = mountComponentWithStore(SidebarComponent, { store }); + + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-selected-stage').textContent.trim()).toEqual('More'); + }); + }); + + describe('with stages', () => { + beforeEach(() => { + store.dispatch('receiveStagesSuccess', stages); + vm = mountComponentWithStore(SidebarComponent, { store }); + }); + + it('renders first stage as selected', () => { + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-selected-stage').textContent.trim()).toEqual( + stages[0].name, + ); + }); + }); + + describe('without jobs for stages', () => { + beforeEach(() => { + store.dispatch('receiveJobSuccess', job); + store.dispatch('receiveStagesSuccess', stages); + vm = mountComponentWithStore(SidebarComponent, { store }); + }); + + it('does not render job container', () => { + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-jobs-container')).toBeNull(); + }); + }); + + describe('with jobs for stages', () => { + beforeEach(() => { + store.dispatch('receiveJobSuccess', job); + store.dispatch('receiveStagesSuccess', stages); + store.dispatch('receiveJobsForStageSuccess', jobsInStage.latest_statuses); + vm = mountComponentWithStore(SidebarComponent, { store }); + }); + + it('renders list of jobs', () => { + expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-jobs-container')).not.toBeNull(); + }); + }); + }); +}); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/stages_dropdown_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/stages_dropdown_spec.js index 402289345aa..aa6cc0f1b1a 100644 --- a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/stages_dropdown_spec.js +++ b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/stages_dropdown_spec.js @@ -8,10 +8,25 @@ describe('Artifacts block', () => { beforeEach(() => { vm = mountComponent(Component, { - pipelineId: 28029444, - pipelinePath: 'pipeline/28029444', - pipelineRef: '50101-truncated-job-information', - pipelineRefPath: 'commits/50101-truncated-job-information', + pipeline: { + id: 28029444, + details: { + status: { + details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/pipelines/28029444', + group: 'success', + has_details: true, + icon: 'status_success', + label: 'passed', + text: 'passed', + tooltip: 'passed', + }, + }, + path: 'pipeline/28029444', + }, + ref: { + path: 'commits/50101-truncated-job-information', + name: '50101-truncated-job-information', + }, stages: [ { name: 'build', @@ -20,15 +35,6 @@ describe('Artifacts block', () => { name: 'test', }, ], - pipelineStatus: { - details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/pipelines/28029444', - group: 'success', - has_details: true, - icon: 'status_success', - label: 'passed', - text: 'passed', - tooltip: 'passed', - }, }); }); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/jobs/mock_data.js b/spec/javascripts/jobs/mock_data.js index 8fdd9b309b7..4269b42e8b6 100644 --- a/spec/javascripts/jobs/mock_data.js +++ b/spec/javascripts/jobs/mock_data.js @@ -20,7 +20,8 @@ export default { group: 'success', has_details: true, details_path: '/root/ci-mock/-/jobs/4757', - favicon: '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-308b4fc054cdd1b68d0865e6cfb7b02e92e3472f201507418f8eddb74ac11a59.png', + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-308b4fc054cdd1b68d0865e6cfb7b02e92e3472f201507418f8eddb74ac11a59.png', action: { icon: 'retry', title: 'Retry', @@ -37,7 +38,8 @@ export default { username: 'root', id: 1, state: 'active', - avatar_url: 'https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/e64c7d89f26bd1972efa854d13d7dd61?s=80\u0026d=identicon', + avatar_url: + 'https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/e64c7d89f26bd1972efa854d13d7dd61?s=80\u0026d=identicon', web_url: 'http://localhost:3000/root', }, erase_path: '/root/ci-mock/-/jobs/4757/erase', @@ -54,7 +56,8 @@ export default { username: 'root', id: 1, state: 'active', - avatar_url: 'https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/e64c7d89f26bd1972efa854d13d7dd61?s=80\u0026d=identicon', + avatar_url: + 'https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/e64c7d89f26bd1972efa854d13d7dd61?s=80\u0026d=identicon', web_url: 'http://localhost:3000/root', }, active: false, @@ -78,7 +81,8 @@ export default { group: 'success', has_details: true, details_path: '/root/ci-mock/pipelines/140', - favicon: '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-308b4fc054cdd1b68d0865e6cfb7b02e92e3472f201507418f8eddb74ac11a59.png', + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-308b4fc054cdd1b68d0865e6cfb7b02e92e3472f201507418f8eddb74ac11a59.png', }, duration: 6, finished_at: '2017-06-01T17:32:00.042Z', @@ -107,11 +111,14 @@ export default { username: 'root', id: 1, state: 'active', - avatar_url: 'https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/e64c7d89f26bd1972efa854d13d7dd61?s=80\u0026d=identicon', + avatar_url: + 'https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/e64c7d89f26bd1972efa854d13d7dd61?s=80\u0026d=identicon', web_url: 'http://localhost:3000/root', }, - author_gravatar_url: 'https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/e64c7d89f26bd1972efa854d13d7dd61?s=80\u0026d=identicon', - commit_url: 'http://localhost:3000/root/ci-mock/commit/c58647773a6b5faf066d4ad6ff2c9fbba5f180f6', + author_gravatar_url: + 'https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/e64c7d89f26bd1972efa854d13d7dd61?s=80\u0026d=identicon', + commit_url: + 'http://localhost:3000/root/ci-mock/commit/c58647773a6b5faf066d4ad6ff2c9fbba5f180f6', commit_path: '/root/ci-mock/commit/c58647773a6b5faf066d4ad6ff2c9fbba5f180f6', }, }, @@ -125,3 +132,1029 @@ export default { }, raw_path: '/root/ci-mock/builds/4757/raw', }; + +export const stages = [ + { + name: 'build', + title: 'build: running', + groups: [ + { + name: 'build:linux', + size: 1, + status: { + icon: 'status_pending', + text: 'pending', + label: 'pending', + group: 'pending', + tooltip: 'pending', + has_details: true, + details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/1180', + illustration: { + image: 'illustrations/pending_job_empty.svg', + size: 'svg-430', + title: 'This job has not started yet', + content: 'This job is in pending state and is waiting to be picked by a runner', + }, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_pending-5bdf338420e5221ca24353b6bff1c9367189588750632e9a871b7af09ff6a2ae.png', + action: { + icon: 'cancel', + title: 'Cancel', + path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/1180/cancel', + method: 'post', + }, + }, + jobs: [ + { + id: 1180, + name: 'build:linux', + started: false, + build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/1180', + cancel_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/1180/cancel', + playable: false, + created_at: '2018-09-28T11:09:57.229Z', + updated_at: '2018-09-28T11:09:57.503Z', + status: { + icon: 'status_pending', + text: 'pending', + label: 'pending', + group: 'pending', + tooltip: 'pending', + has_details: true, + details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/1180', + illustration: { + image: 'illustrations/pending_job_empty.svg', + size: 'svg-430', + title: 'This job has not started yet', + content: 'This job is in pending state and is waiting to be picked by a runner', + }, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_pending-5bdf338420e5221ca24353b6bff1c9367189588750632e9a871b7af09ff6a2ae.png', + action: { + icon: 'cancel', + title: 'Cancel', + path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/1180/cancel', + method: 'post', + }, + }, + }, + ], + }, + { + name: 'build:osx', + size: 1, + status: { + icon: 'status_success', + text: 'passed', + label: 'passed', + group: 'success', + tooltip: 'passed', + has_details: true, + details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/444', + illustration: { + image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg', + size: 'svg-430', + title: 'This job does not have a trace.', + }, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png', + action: { + icon: 'retry', + title: 'Retry', + path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/444/retry', + method: 'post', + }, + }, + jobs: [ + { + id: 444, + name: 'build:osx', + started: '2018-05-18T05:32:20.655Z', + build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/444', + retry_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/444/retry', + playable: false, + created_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.364Z', + updated_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.364Z', + status: { + icon: 'status_success', + text: 'passed', + label: 'passed', + group: 'success', + tooltip: 'passed', + has_details: true, + details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/444', + illustration: { + image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg', + size: 'svg-430', + title: 'This job does not have a trace.', + }, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png', + action: { + icon: 'retry', + title: 'Retry', + path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/444/retry', + method: 'post', + }, + }, + }, + ], + }, + ], + status: { + icon: 'status_running', + text: 'running', + label: 'running', + group: 'running', + tooltip: 'running', + has_details: true, + details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/pipelines/27#build', + illustration: null, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_running-9c635b2419a8e1ec991c993061b89cc5aefc0743bb238ecd0c381e7741a70e8c.png', + }, + path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/pipelines/27#build', + dropdown_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/pipelines/27/stage.json?stage=build', + }, + { + name: 'test', + title: 'test: passed with warnings', + groups: [ + { + name: 'jenkins', + size: 1, + status: { + icon: 'status_success', + text: 'passed', + label: null, + group: 'success', + tooltip: null, + has_details: false, + details_path: null, + illustration: null, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png', + }, + jobs: [ + { + id: 459, + name: 'jenkins', + started: '2018-05-18T09:32:20.658Z', + build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/459', + playable: false, + created_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:55.330Z', + updated_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:55.330Z', + status: { + icon: 'status_success', + text: 'passed', + label: null, + group: 'success', + tooltip: null, + has_details: false, + details_path: null, + illustration: null, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png', + }, + }, + ], + }, + { + name: 'rspec:linux', + size: 3, + status: { + icon: 'status_success', + text: 'passed', + label: 'passed', + group: 'success', + tooltip: 'passed', + has_details: false, + details_path: null, + illustration: null, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png', + }, + jobs: [ + { + id: 445, + name: 'rspec:linux 0 3', + started: '2018-05-18T07:32:20.655Z', + build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/445', + retry_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/445/retry', + playable: false, + created_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.425Z', + updated_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.425Z', + status: { + icon: 'status_success', + text: 'passed', + label: 'passed', + group: 'success', + tooltip: 'passed', + has_details: true, + details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/445', + illustration: { + image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg', + size: 'svg-430', + title: 'This job does not have a trace.', + }, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png', + action: { + icon: 'retry', + title: 'Retry', + path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/445/retry', + method: 'post', + }, + }, + }, + { + id: 446, + name: 'rspec:linux 1 3', + started: '2018-05-18T07:32:20.655Z', + build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/446', + retry_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/446/retry', + playable: false, + created_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.506Z', + updated_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.506Z', + status: { + icon: 'status_success', + text: 'passed', + label: 'passed', + group: 'success', + tooltip: 'passed', + has_details: true, + details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/446', + illustration: { + image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg', + size: 'svg-430', + title: 'This job does not have a trace.', + }, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png', + action: { + icon: 'retry', + title: 'Retry', + path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/446/retry', + method: 'post', + }, + }, + }, + { + id: 447, + name: 'rspec:linux 2 3', + started: '2018-05-18T07:32:20.656Z', + build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/447', + retry_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/447/retry', + playable: false, + created_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.572Z', + updated_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.572Z', + status: { + icon: 'status_success', + text: 'passed', + label: 'passed', + group: 'success', + tooltip: 'passed', + has_details: true, + details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/447', + illustration: { + image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg', + size: 'svg-430', + title: 'This job does not have a trace.', + }, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png', + action: { + icon: 'retry', + title: 'Retry', + path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/447/retry', + method: 'post', + }, + }, + }, + ], + }, + { + name: 'rspec:osx', + size: 1, + status: { + icon: 'status_success', + text: 'passed', + label: 'passed', + group: 'success', + tooltip: 'passed', + has_details: true, + details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/452', + illustration: { + image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg', + size: 'svg-430', + title: 'This job does not have a trace.', + }, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png', + action: { + icon: 'retry', + title: 'Retry', + path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/452/retry', + method: 'post', + }, + }, + jobs: [ + { + id: 452, + name: 'rspec:osx', + started: '2018-05-18T07:32:20.657Z', + build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/452', + retry_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/452/retry', + playable: false, + created_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.920Z', + updated_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.920Z', + status: { + icon: 'status_success', + text: 'passed', + label: 'passed', + group: 'success', + tooltip: 'passed', + has_details: true, + details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/452', + illustration: { + image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg', + size: 'svg-430', + title: 'This job does not have a trace.', + }, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png', + action: { + icon: 'retry', + title: 'Retry', + path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/452/retry', + method: 'post', + }, + }, + }, + ], + }, + { + name: 'rspec:windows', + size: 3, + status: { + icon: 'status_success', + text: 'passed', + label: 'passed', + group: 'success', + tooltip: 'passed', + has_details: false, + details_path: null, + illustration: null, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png', + }, + jobs: [ + { + id: 448, + name: 'rspec:windows 0 3', + started: '2018-05-18T07:32:20.656Z', + build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/448', + retry_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/448/retry', + playable: false, + created_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.639Z', + updated_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.639Z', + status: { + icon: 'status_success', + text: 'passed', + label: 'passed', + group: 'success', + tooltip: 'passed', + has_details: true, + details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/448', + illustration: { + image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg', + size: 'svg-430', + title: 'This job does not have a trace.', + }, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png', + action: { + icon: 'retry', + title: 'Retry', + path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/448/retry', + method: 'post', + }, + }, + }, + { + id: 449, + name: 'rspec:windows 1 3', + started: '2018-05-18T07:32:20.656Z', + build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/449', + retry_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/449/retry', + playable: false, + created_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.703Z', + updated_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.703Z', + status: { + icon: 'status_success', + text: 'passed', + label: 'passed', + group: 'success', + tooltip: 'passed', + has_details: true, + details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/449', + illustration: { + image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg', + size: 'svg-430', + title: 'This job does not have a trace.', + }, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png', + action: { + icon: 'retry', + title: 'Retry', + path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/449/retry', + method: 'post', + }, + }, + }, + { + id: 451, + name: 'rspec:windows 2 3', + started: '2018-05-18T07:32:20.657Z', + build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/451', + retry_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/451/retry', + playable: false, + created_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.853Z', + updated_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.853Z', + status: { + icon: 'status_success', + text: 'passed', + label: 'passed', + group: 'success', + tooltip: 'passed', + has_details: true, + details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/451', + illustration: { + image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg', + size: 'svg-430', + title: 'This job does not have a trace.', + }, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png', + action: { + icon: 'retry', + title: 'Retry', + path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/451/retry', + method: 'post', + }, + }, + }, + ], + }, + { + name: 'spinach:linux', + size: 1, + status: { + icon: 'status_success', + text: 'passed', + label: 'passed', + group: 'success', + tooltip: 'passed', + has_details: true, + details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/453', + illustration: { + image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg', + size: 'svg-430', + title: 'This job does not have a trace.', + }, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png', + action: { + icon: 'retry', + title: 'Retry', + path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/453/retry', + method: 'post', + }, + }, + jobs: [ + { + id: 453, + name: 'spinach:linux', + started: '2018-05-18T07:32:20.657Z', + build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/453', + retry_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/453/retry', + playable: false, + created_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.993Z', + updated_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.993Z', + status: { + icon: 'status_success', + text: 'passed', + label: 'passed', + group: 'success', + tooltip: 'passed', + has_details: true, + details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/453', + illustration: { + image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg', + size: 'svg-430', + title: 'This job does not have a trace.', + }, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png', + action: { + icon: 'retry', + title: 'Retry', + path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/453/retry', + method: 'post', + }, + }, + }, + ], + }, + { + name: 'spinach:osx', + size: 1, + status: { + icon: 'status_warning', + text: 'failed', + label: 'failed (allowed to fail)', + group: 'failed_with_warnings', + tooltip: 'failed - (unknown failure) (allowed to fail)', + has_details: true, + details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/454', + illustration: { + image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg', + size: 'svg-430', + title: 'This job does not have a trace.', + }, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_failed-41304d7f7e3828808b0c26771f0309e55296819a9beea3ea9fbf6689d9857c12.png', + action: { + icon: 'retry', + title: 'Retry', + path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/454/retry', + method: 'post', + }, + }, + jobs: [ + { + id: 454, + name: 'spinach:osx', + started: '2018-05-18T07:32:20.657Z', + build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/454', + retry_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/454/retry', + playable: false, + created_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:55.053Z', + updated_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:55.053Z', + status: { + icon: 'status_warning', + text: 'failed', + label: 'failed (allowed to fail)', + group: 'failed_with_warnings', + tooltip: 'failed - (unknown failure) (allowed to fail)', + has_details: true, + details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/454', + illustration: { + image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg', + size: 'svg-430', + title: 'This job does not have a trace.', + }, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_failed-41304d7f7e3828808b0c26771f0309e55296819a9beea3ea9fbf6689d9857c12.png', + action: { + icon: 'retry', + title: 'Retry', + path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/454/retry', + method: 'post', + }, + }, + callout_message: 'There is an unknown failure, please try again', + recoverable: true, + }, + ], + }, + ], + status: { + icon: 'status_warning', + text: 'passed', + label: 'passed with warnings', + group: 'success_with_warnings', + tooltip: 'passed', + has_details: true, + details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/pipelines/27#test', + illustration: null, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png', + }, + path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/pipelines/27#test', + dropdown_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/pipelines/27/stage.json?stage=test', + }, + { + name: 'deploy', + title: 'deploy: running', + groups: [ + { + name: 'production', + size: 1, + status: { + icon: 'status_created', + text: 'created', + label: 'created', + group: 'created', + tooltip: 'created', + has_details: true, + details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/457', + illustration: { + image: 'illustrations/job_not_triggered.svg', + size: 'svg-306', + title: 'This job has not been triggered yet', + content: + 'This job depends on upstream jobs that need to succeed in order for this job to be triggered', + }, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_created-4b975aa976d24e5a3ea7cd9a5713e6ce2cd9afd08b910415e96675de35f64955.png', + action: { + icon: 'cancel', + title: 'Cancel', + path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/457/cancel', + method: 'post', + }, + }, + jobs: [ + { + id: 457, + name: 'production', + started: false, + build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/457', + cancel_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/457/cancel', + playable: false, + created_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:55.259Z', + updated_at: '2018-09-28T11:09:57.454Z', + status: { + icon: 'status_created', + text: 'created', + label: 'created', + group: 'created', + tooltip: 'created', + has_details: true, + details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/457', + illustration: { + image: 'illustrations/job_not_triggered.svg', + size: 'svg-306', + title: 'This job has not been triggered yet', + content: + 'This job depends on upstream jobs that need to succeed in order for this job to be triggered', + }, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_created-4b975aa976d24e5a3ea7cd9a5713e6ce2cd9afd08b910415e96675de35f64955.png', + action: { + icon: 'cancel', + title: 'Cancel', + path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/457/cancel', + method: 'post', + }, + }, + }, + ], + }, + { + name: 'staging', + size: 1, + status: { + icon: 'status_success', + text: 'passed', + label: 'passed', + group: 'success', + tooltip: 'passed', + has_details: true, + details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/455', + illustration: { + image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg', + size: 'svg-430', + title: 'This job does not have a trace.', + }, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png', + action: { + icon: 'retry', + title: 'Retry', + path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/455/retry', + method: 'post', + }, + }, + jobs: [ + { + id: 455, + name: 'staging', + started: '2018-05-18T09:32:20.658Z', + build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/455', + retry_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/455/retry', + playable: false, + created_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:55.119Z', + updated_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:55.119Z', + status: { + icon: 'status_success', + text: 'passed', + label: 'passed', + group: 'success', + tooltip: 'passed', + has_details: true, + details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/455', + illustration: { + image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg', + size: 'svg-430', + title: 'This job does not have a trace.', + }, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png', + action: { + icon: 'retry', + title: 'Retry', + path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/455/retry', + method: 'post', + }, + }, + }, + ], + }, + { + name: 'stop staging', + size: 1, + status: { + icon: 'status_created', + text: 'created', + label: 'created', + group: 'created', + tooltip: 'created', + has_details: true, + details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/456', + illustration: { + image: 'illustrations/job_not_triggered.svg', + size: 'svg-306', + title: 'This job has not been triggered yet', + content: + 'This job depends on upstream jobs that need to succeed in order for this job to be triggered', + }, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_created-4b975aa976d24e5a3ea7cd9a5713e6ce2cd9afd08b910415e96675de35f64955.png', + action: { + icon: 'cancel', + title: 'Cancel', + path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/456/cancel', + method: 'post', + }, + }, + jobs: [ + { + id: 456, + name: 'stop staging', + started: false, + build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/456', + cancel_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/456/cancel', + playable: false, + created_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:55.205Z', + updated_at: '2018-09-28T11:09:57.396Z', + status: { + icon: 'status_created', + text: 'created', + label: 'created', + group: 'created', + tooltip: 'created', + has_details: true, + details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/456', + illustration: { + image: 'illustrations/job_not_triggered.svg', + size: 'svg-306', + title: 'This job has not been triggered yet', + content: + 'This job depends on upstream jobs that need to succeed in order for this job to be triggered', + }, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_created-4b975aa976d24e5a3ea7cd9a5713e6ce2cd9afd08b910415e96675de35f64955.png', + action: { + icon: 'cancel', + title: 'Cancel', + path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/456/cancel', + method: 'post', + }, + }, + }, + ], + }, + ], + status: { + icon: 'status_running', + text: 'running', + label: 'running', + group: 'running', + tooltip: 'running', + has_details: true, + details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/pipelines/27#deploy', + illustration: null, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_running-9c635b2419a8e1ec991c993061b89cc5aefc0743bb238ecd0c381e7741a70e8c.png', + }, + path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/pipelines/27#deploy', + dropdown_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/pipelines/27/stage.json?stage=deploy', + }, + { + name: 'notify', + title: 'notify: manual action', + groups: [ + { + name: 'slack', + size: 1, + status: { + icon: 'status_manual', + text: 'manual', + label: 'manual play action', + group: 'manual', + tooltip: 'manual action', + has_details: true, + details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/458', + illustration: { + image: 'illustrations/manual_action.svg', + size: 'svg-394', + title: 'This job requires a manual action', + content: + 'This job depends on a user to trigger its process. Often they are used to deploy code to production environments', + }, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_manual-829a0804612cef47d9efc1618dba38325483657c847dba0546c3b9f0295bb36c.png', + action: { + icon: 'play', + title: 'Play', + path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/458/play', + method: 'post', + }, + }, + jobs: [ + { + id: 458, + name: 'slack', + started: null, + build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/458', + play_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/458/play', + playable: true, + created_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:55.303Z', + updated_at: '2018-05-18T15:34:08.535Z', + status: { + icon: 'status_manual', + text: 'manual', + label: 'manual play action', + group: 'manual', + tooltip: 'manual action', + has_details: true, + details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/458', + illustration: { + image: 'illustrations/manual_action.svg', + size: 'svg-394', + title: 'This job requires a manual action', + content: + 'This job depends on a user to trigger its process. Often they are used to deploy code to production environments', + }, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_manual-829a0804612cef47d9efc1618dba38325483657c847dba0546c3b9f0295bb36c.png', + action: { + icon: 'play', + title: 'Play', + path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/458/play', + method: 'post', + }, + }, + }, + ], + }, + ], + status: { + icon: 'status_manual', + text: 'manual', + label: 'manual action', + group: 'manual', + tooltip: 'manual action', + has_details: true, + details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/pipelines/27#notify', + illustration: null, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_manual-829a0804612cef47d9efc1618dba38325483657c847dba0546c3b9f0295bb36c.png', + }, + path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/pipelines/27#notify', + dropdown_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/pipelines/27/stage.json?stage=notify', + }, +]; + +export const jobsInStage = { + name: 'build', + title: 'build: running', + latest_statuses: [ + { + id: 1180, + name: 'build:linux', + started: false, + build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/1180', + cancel_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/1180/cancel', + playable: false, + created_at: '2018-09-28T11:09:57.229Z', + updated_at: '2018-09-28T11:09:57.503Z', + status: { + icon: 'status_pending', + text: 'pending', + label: 'pending', + group: 'pending', + tooltip: 'pending', + has_details: true, + details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/1180', + illustration: { + image: 'illustrations/pending_job_empty.svg', + size: 'svg-430', + title: 'This job has not started yet', + content: 'This job is in pending state and is waiting to be picked by a runner', + }, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_pending-5bdf338420e5221ca24353b6bff1c9367189588750632e9a871b7af09ff6a2ae.png', + action: { + icon: 'cancel', + title: 'Cancel', + path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/1180/cancel', + method: 'post', + }, + }, + }, + { + id: 444, + name: 'build:osx', + started: '2018-05-18T05:32:20.655Z', + build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/444', + retry_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/444/retry', + playable: false, + created_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.364Z', + updated_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.364Z', + status: { + icon: 'status_success', + text: 'passed', + label: 'passed', + group: 'success', + tooltip: 'passed', + has_details: true, + details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/444', + illustration: { + image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg', + size: 'svg-430', + title: 'This job does not have a trace.', + }, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png', + action: { + icon: 'retry', + title: 'Retry', + path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/444/retry', + method: 'post', + }, + }, + }, + ], + retried: [ + { + id: 443, + name: 'build:linux', + started: '2018-05-18T06:32:20.655Z', + build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/443', + retry_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/443/retry', + playable: false, + created_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.296Z', + updated_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.296Z', + status: { + icon: 'status_success', + text: 'passed', + label: 'passed', + group: 'success', + tooltip: 'passed (retried)', + has_details: true, + details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/443', + illustration: { + image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg', + size: 'svg-430', + title: 'This job does not have a trace.', + }, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png', + action: { + icon: 'retry', + title: 'Retry', + path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/443/retry', + method: 'post', + }, + }, + }, + ], + status: { + icon: 'status_running', + text: 'running', + label: 'running', + group: 'running', + tooltip: 'running', + has_details: true, + details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/pipelines/27#build', + illustration: null, + favicon: + '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_running-9c635b2419a8e1ec991c993061b89cc5aefc0743bb238ecd0c381e7741a70e8c.png', + }, + path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/pipelines/27#build', + dropdown_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/pipelines/27/stage.json?stage=build', +}; diff --git a/spec/javascripts/jobs/store/actions_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/jobs/store/actions_spec.js index 5042718dfa0..5ab1f75d0d6 100644 --- a/spec/javascripts/jobs/store/actions_spec.js +++ b/spec/javascripts/jobs/store/actions_spec.js @@ -27,7 +27,6 @@ import { receiveStagesSuccess, receiveStagesError, requestJobsForStage, - setSelectedStage, fetchJobsForStage, receiveJobsForStageSuccess, receiveJobsForStageError, @@ -236,7 +235,8 @@ describe('Job State actions', () => { }, { payload: { - html: 'I, [2018-08-17T22:57:45.707325 #1841] INFO -- :', complete: true, + html: 'I, [2018-08-17T22:57:45.707325 #1841] INFO -- :', + complete: true, }, type: 'receiveTraceSuccess', }, @@ -421,7 +421,9 @@ describe('Job State actions', () => { let mock; beforeEach(() => { - mockedState.stagesEndpoint = `${TEST_HOST}/endpoint.json`; + mockedState.job.pipeline = { + path: `${TEST_HOST}/endpoint.json/stages`, + }; mock = new MockAdapter(axios); }); @@ -430,8 +432,10 @@ describe('Job State actions', () => { }); describe('success', () => { - it('dispatches requestStages and receiveStagesSuccess ', done => { - mock.onGet(`${TEST_HOST}/endpoint.json`).replyOnce(200, [{ id: 121212, name: 'build' }]); + it('dispatches requestStages and receiveStagesSuccess, fetchJobsForStage ', done => { + mock + .onGet(`${TEST_HOST}/endpoint.json/stages`) + .replyOnce(200, { details: { stages: [{ id: 121212, name: 'build' }] } }); testAction( fetchStages, @@ -446,6 +450,10 @@ describe('Job State actions', () => { payload: [{ id: 121212, name: 'build' }], type: 'receiveStagesSuccess', }, + { + payload: { id: 121212, name: 'build' }, + type: 'fetchJobsForStage', + }, ], done, ); @@ -516,24 +524,10 @@ describe('Job State actions', () => { }); }); - describe('setSelectedStage', () => { - it('should commit SET_SELECTED_STAGE mutation ', done => { - testAction( - setSelectedStage, - { name: 'build' }, - mockedState, - [{ type: types.SET_SELECTED_STAGE, payload: { name: 'build' } }], - [], - done, - ); - }); - }); - describe('fetchJobsForStage', () => { let mock; beforeEach(() => { - mockedState.stageJobsEndpoint = `${TEST_HOST}/endpoint.json`; mock = new MockAdapter(axios); }); @@ -542,20 +536,18 @@ describe('Job State actions', () => { }); describe('success', () => { - it('dispatches setSelectedStage, requestJobsForStage and receiveJobsForStageSuccess ', done => { - mock.onGet(`${TEST_HOST}/endpoint.json`).replyOnce(200, [{ id: 121212, name: 'build' }]); + it('dispatches requestJobsForStage and receiveJobsForStageSuccess ', done => { + mock + .onGet(`${TEST_HOST}/jobs.json`) + .replyOnce(200, { latest_statuses: [{ id: 121212, name: 'build' }], retried: [] }); testAction( fetchJobsForStage, - null, + { dropdown_path: `${TEST_HOST}/jobs.json` }, mockedState, [], [ { - type: 'setSelectedStage', - payload: null, - }, - { type: 'requestJobsForStage', }, { @@ -570,21 +562,17 @@ describe('Job State actions', () => { describe('error', () => { beforeEach(() => { - mock.onGet(`${TEST_HOST}/endpoint.json`).reply(500); + mock.onGet(`${TEST_HOST}/jobs.json`).reply(500); }); - it('dispatches setSelectedStage, requestJobsForStage and receiveJobsForStageError', done => { + it('dispatches requestJobsForStage and receiveJobsForStageError', done => { testAction( fetchJobsForStage, - null, + { dropdown_path: `${TEST_HOST}/jobs.json` }, mockedState, [], [ { - payload: null, - type: 'setSelectedStage', - }, - { type: 'requestJobsForStage', }, { diff --git a/spec/javascripts/jobs/store/getters_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/jobs/store/getters_spec.js new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..160b2f4b34a --- /dev/null +++ b/spec/javascripts/jobs/store/getters_spec.js @@ -0,0 +1,213 @@ +import * as getters from '~/jobs/store/getters'; +import state from '~/jobs/store/state'; + +describe('Job Store Getters', () => { + let localState; + + beforeEach(() => { + localState = state(); + }); + + describe('headerActions', () => { + describe('with new issue path', () => { + it('returns an array with action to create a new issue', () => { + localState.job.new_issue_path = 'issues/new'; + + expect(getters.headerActions(localState)).toEqual([ + { + label: 'New issue', + path: localState.job.new_issue_path, + cssClass: + 'js-new-issue btn btn-success btn-inverted d-none d-md-block d-lg-block d-xl-block', + type: 'link', + }, + ]); + }); + }); + + describe('without new issue path', () => { + it('returns an empty array', () => { + expect(getters.headerActions(localState)).toEqual([]); + }); + }); + }); + + describe('headerTime', () => { + describe('when the job has started key', () => { + it('returns started key', () => { + const started = '2018-08-31T16:20:49.023Z'; + localState.job.started = started; + + expect(getters.headerTime(localState)).toEqual(started); + }); + }); + + describe('when the job does not have started key', () => { + it('returns created_at key', () => { + const created = '2018-08-31T16:20:49.023Z'; + localState.job.created_at = created; + expect(getters.headerTime(localState)).toEqual(created); + }); + }); + }); + + describe('shouldRenderCalloutMessage', () => { + describe('with status and callout message', () => { + it('returns true', () => { + localState.job.callout_message = 'Callout message'; + localState.job.status = { icon: 'passed' }; + + expect(getters.shouldRenderCalloutMessage(localState)).toEqual(true); + }); + }); + + describe('without status & with callout message', () => { + it('returns false', () => { + localState.job.callout_message = 'Callout message'; + expect(getters.shouldRenderCalloutMessage(localState)).toEqual(false); + }); + }); + + describe('with status & without callout message', () => { + it('returns false', () => { + localState.job.status = { icon: 'passed' }; + + expect(getters.shouldRenderCalloutMessage(localState)).toEqual(false); + }); + }); + }); + + describe('jobHasStarted', () => { + describe('when started equals false', () => { + it('returns false', () => { + localState.job.started = false; + expect(getters.jobHasStarted(localState)).toEqual(false); + }); + }); + + describe('when started equals string', () => { + it('returns true', () => { + localState.job.started = '2018-08-31T16:20:49.023Z'; + expect(getters.jobHasStarted(localState)).toEqual(true); + }); + }); + }); + + describe('hasEnvironment', () => { + describe('without `deployment_status`', () => { + it('returns false', () => { + expect(getters.hasEnvironment(localState)).toEqual(false); + }); + }); + + describe('with an empty object for `deployment_status`', () => { + it('returns false', () => { + localState.job.deployment_status = {}; + expect(getters.hasEnvironment(localState)).toEqual(false); + }); + }); + + describe('when `deployment_status` is defined and not empty', () => { + it('returns true', () => { + localState.job.deployment_status = { + status: 'creating', + environment: { + last_deployment: {}, + }, + }; + + expect(getters.hasEnvironment(localState)).toEqual(true); + }); + }); + }); + + describe('hasTrace', () => { + describe('when has_trace is true', () => { + it('returns true', () => { + localState.job.has_trace = true; + localState.job.status = {}; + + expect(getters.hasTrace(localState)).toEqual(true); + }); + }); + + describe('when job is running', () => { + it('returns true', () => { + localState.job.has_trace = false; + localState.job.status = { group: 'running' }; + + expect(getters.hasTrace(localState)).toEqual(true); + }); + }); + + describe('when has_trace is false and job is not running', () => { + it('returns false', () => { + localState.job.has_trace = false; + localState.job.status = { group: 'pending' }; + + expect(getters.hasTrace(localState)).toEqual(false); + }); + }); + }); + + describe('emptyStateIllustration', () => { + describe('with defined illustration', () => { + it('returns the state illustration object', () => { + localState.job.status = { + illustration: { + path: 'foo', + }, + }; + + expect(getters.emptyStateIllustration(localState)).toEqual({ path: 'foo' }); + }); + }); + + describe('when illustration is not defined', () => { + it('returns an empty object', () => { + expect(getters.emptyStateIllustration(localState)).toEqual({}); + }); + }); + }); + + describe('isJobStuck', () => { + describe('when job is pending and runners are not available', () => { + it('returns true', () => { + localState.job.status = { + group: 'pending', + }; + localState.job.runners = { + available: false, + }; + + expect(getters.isJobStuck(localState)).toEqual(true); + }); + }); + + describe('when job is not pending', () => { + it('returns false', () => { + localState.job.status = { + group: 'running', + }; + localState.job.runners = { + available: false, + }; + + expect(getters.isJobStuck(localState)).toEqual(false); + }); + }); + + describe('when runners are available', () => { + it('returns false', () => { + localState.job.status = { + group: 'pending', + }; + localState.job.runners = { + available: true, + }; + + expect(getters.isJobStuck(localState)).toEqual(false); + }); + }); + }); +}); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/lazy_loader_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/lazy_loader_spec.js index c177d79b9e0..eac4756e8a9 100644 --- a/spec/javascripts/lazy_loader_spec.js +++ b/spec/javascripts/lazy_loader_spec.js @@ -1,57 +1,214 @@ import LazyLoader from '~/lazy_loader'; +import { TEST_HOST } from './test_constants'; let lazyLoader = null; +const execImmediately = callback => { + callback(); +}; + describe('LazyLoader', function() { preloadFixtures('issues/issue_with_comment.html.raw'); - beforeEach(function() { - loadFixtures('issues/issue_with_comment.html.raw'); - lazyLoader = new LazyLoader({ - observerNode: 'body', + describe('with IntersectionObserver disabled', () => { + beforeEach(function() { + loadFixtures('issues/issue_with_comment.html.raw'); + + lazyLoader = new LazyLoader({ + observerNode: 'foobar', + }); + + spyOn(LazyLoader, 'supportsIntersectionObserver').and.callFake(() => false); + + spyOn(LazyLoader, 'loadImage').and.callThrough(); + + spyOn(window, 'requestAnimationFrame').and.callFake(execImmediately); + spyOn(window, 'requestIdleCallback').and.callFake(execImmediately); + + // Doing everything that happens normally in onload + lazyLoader.register(); + }); + + afterEach(() => { + lazyLoader.unregister(); + }); + + it('should copy value from data-src to src for img 1', function(done) { + const img = document.querySelectorAll('img[data-src]')[0]; + const originalDataSrc = img.getAttribute('data-src'); + img.scrollIntoView(); + + setTimeout(() => { + expect(LazyLoader.loadImage).toHaveBeenCalled(); + expect(img.getAttribute('src')).toBe(originalDataSrc); + expect(img).toHaveClass('js-lazy-loaded'); + done(); + }, 50); + }); + + it('should lazy load dynamically added data-src images', function(done) { + const newImg = document.createElement('img'); + const testPath = `${TEST_HOST}/img/testimg.png`; + newImg.className = 'lazy'; + newImg.setAttribute('data-src', testPath); + document.body.appendChild(newImg); + newImg.scrollIntoView(); + + setTimeout(() => { + expect(LazyLoader.loadImage).toHaveBeenCalled(); + expect(newImg.getAttribute('src')).toBe(testPath); + expect(newImg).toHaveClass('js-lazy-loaded'); + done(); + }, 50); + }); + + it('should not alter normal images', function(done) { + const newImg = document.createElement('img'); + const testPath = `${TEST_HOST}/img/testimg.png`; + newImg.setAttribute('src', testPath); + document.body.appendChild(newImg); + newImg.scrollIntoView(); + + setTimeout(() => { + expect(LazyLoader.loadImage).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); + expect(newImg).not.toHaveClass('js-lazy-loaded'); + done(); + }, 50); + }); + + it('should not load dynamically added pictures if content observer is turned off', done => { + lazyLoader.stopContentObserver(); + + const newImg = document.createElement('img'); + const testPath = `${TEST_HOST}/img/testimg.png`; + newImg.className = 'lazy'; + newImg.setAttribute('data-src', testPath); + document.body.appendChild(newImg); + newImg.scrollIntoView(); + + setTimeout(() => { + expect(LazyLoader.loadImage).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); + expect(newImg).not.toHaveClass('js-lazy-loaded'); + done(); + }, 50); + }); + + it('should load dynamically added pictures if content observer is turned off and on again', done => { + lazyLoader.stopContentObserver(); + lazyLoader.startContentObserver(); + + const newImg = document.createElement('img'); + const testPath = `${TEST_HOST}/img/testimg.png`; + newImg.className = 'lazy'; + newImg.setAttribute('data-src', testPath); + document.body.appendChild(newImg); + newImg.scrollIntoView(); + + setTimeout(() => { + expect(LazyLoader.loadImage).toHaveBeenCalled(); + expect(newImg).toHaveClass('js-lazy-loaded'); + done(); + }, 50); }); - // Doing everything that happens normally in onload - lazyLoader.loadCheck(); }); - describe('behavior', function() { + + describe('with IntersectionObserver enabled', () => { + beforeEach(function() { + loadFixtures('issues/issue_with_comment.html.raw'); + + lazyLoader = new LazyLoader({ + observerNode: 'foobar', + }); + + spyOn(LazyLoader, 'loadImage').and.callThrough(); + + spyOn(window, 'requestAnimationFrame').and.callFake(execImmediately); + spyOn(window, 'requestIdleCallback').and.callFake(execImmediately); + + // Doing everything that happens normally in onload + lazyLoader.register(); + }); + + afterEach(() => { + lazyLoader.unregister(); + }); + it('should copy value from data-src to src for img 1', function(done) { const img = document.querySelectorAll('img[data-src]')[0]; const originalDataSrc = img.getAttribute('data-src'); img.scrollIntoView(); setTimeout(() => { + expect(LazyLoader.loadImage).toHaveBeenCalled(); expect(img.getAttribute('src')).toBe(originalDataSrc); - expect(document.getElementsByClassName('js-lazy-loaded').length).toBeGreaterThan(0); + expect(img).toHaveClass('js-lazy-loaded'); done(); - }, 100); + }, 50); }); it('should lazy load dynamically added data-src images', function(done) { const newImg = document.createElement('img'); - const testPath = '/img/testimg.png'; + const testPath = `${TEST_HOST}/img/testimg.png`; newImg.className = 'lazy'; newImg.setAttribute('data-src', testPath); document.body.appendChild(newImg); newImg.scrollIntoView(); setTimeout(() => { + expect(LazyLoader.loadImage).toHaveBeenCalled(); expect(newImg.getAttribute('src')).toBe(testPath); - expect(document.getElementsByClassName('js-lazy-loaded').length).toBeGreaterThan(0); + expect(newImg).toHaveClass('js-lazy-loaded'); done(); - }, 100); + }, 50); }); it('should not alter normal images', function(done) { const newImg = document.createElement('img'); - const testPath = '/img/testimg.png'; + const testPath = `${TEST_HOST}/img/testimg.png`; newImg.setAttribute('src', testPath); document.body.appendChild(newImg); newImg.scrollIntoView(); setTimeout(() => { + expect(LazyLoader.loadImage).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); + expect(newImg).not.toHaveClass('js-lazy-loaded'); + done(); + }, 50); + }); + + it('should not load dynamically added pictures if content observer is turned off', done => { + lazyLoader.stopContentObserver(); + + const newImg = document.createElement('img'); + const testPath = `${TEST_HOST}/img/testimg.png`; + newImg.className = 'lazy'; + newImg.setAttribute('data-src', testPath); + document.body.appendChild(newImg); + newImg.scrollIntoView(); + + setTimeout(() => { + expect(LazyLoader.loadImage).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); expect(newImg).not.toHaveClass('js-lazy-loaded'); done(); - }, 100); + }, 50); + }); + + it('should load dynamically added pictures if content observer is turned off and on again', done => { + lazyLoader.stopContentObserver(); + lazyLoader.startContentObserver(); + + const newImg = document.createElement('img'); + const testPath = `${TEST_HOST}/img/testimg.png`; + newImg.className = 'lazy'; + newImg.setAttribute('data-src', testPath); + document.body.appendChild(newImg); + newImg.scrollIntoView(); + + setTimeout(() => { + expect(LazyLoader.loadImage).toHaveBeenCalled(); + expect(newImg).toHaveClass('js-lazy-loaded'); + done(); + }, 50); }); }); }); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/lib/utils/text_markdown_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/lib/utils/text_markdown_spec.js index ca0e7c395a0..043dd018e0c 100644 --- a/spec/javascripts/lib/utils/text_markdown_spec.js +++ b/spec/javascripts/lib/utils/text_markdown_spec.js @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ describe('init markdown', () => { textArea.selectionStart = 0; textArea.selectionEnd = 0; - insertMarkdownText(textArea, textArea.value, '*', null, '', false); + insertMarkdownText({ textArea, text: textArea.value, tag: '*', blockTag: null, selected: '', wrap: false }); expect(textArea.value).toEqual(`${initialValue}* `); }); @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ describe('init markdown', () => { textArea.value = initialValue; textArea.setSelectionRange(initialValue.length, initialValue.length); - insertMarkdownText(textArea, textArea.value, '*', null, '', false); + insertMarkdownText({ textArea, text: textArea.value, tag: '*', blockTag: null, selected: '', wrap: false }); expect(textArea.value).toEqual(`${initialValue}\n* `); }); @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ describe('init markdown', () => { textArea.value = initialValue; textArea.setSelectionRange(initialValue.length, initialValue.length); - insertMarkdownText(textArea, textArea.value, '*', null, '', false); + insertMarkdownText({ textArea, text: textArea.value, tag: '*', blockTag: null, selected: '', wrap: false }); expect(textArea.value).toEqual(`${initialValue}* `); }); @@ -54,9 +54,70 @@ describe('init markdown', () => { textArea.value = initialValue; textArea.setSelectionRange(initialValue.length, initialValue.length); - insertMarkdownText(textArea, textArea.value, '*', null, '', false); + insertMarkdownText({ textArea, text: textArea.value, tag: '*', blockTag: null, selected: '', wrap: false }); expect(textArea.value).toEqual(`${initialValue}* `); }); }); + + describe('with selection', () => { + const text = 'initial selected value'; + const selected = 'selected'; + beforeEach(() => { + textArea.value = text; + const selectedIndex = text.indexOf(selected); + textArea.setSelectionRange(selectedIndex, selectedIndex + selected.length); + }); + + it('applies the tag to the selected value', () => { + insertMarkdownText({ textArea, text: textArea.value, tag: '*', blockTag: null, selected, wrap: true }); + + expect(textArea.value).toEqual(text.replace(selected, `*${selected}*`)); + }); + + it('replaces the placeholder in the tag', () => { + insertMarkdownText({ textArea, text: textArea.value, tag: '[{text}](url)', blockTag: null, selected, wrap: false }); + + expect(textArea.value).toEqual(text.replace(selected, `[${selected}](url)`)); + }); + + describe('and text to be selected', () => { + const tag = '[{text}](url)'; + const select = 'url'; + + it('selects the text', () => { + insertMarkdownText({ textArea, + text: textArea.value, + tag, + blockTag: null, + selected, + wrap: false, + select }); + + const expectedText = text.replace(selected, `[${selected}](url)`); + expect(textArea.value).toEqual(expectedText); + expect(textArea.selectionStart).toEqual(expectedText.indexOf(select)); + expect(textArea.selectionEnd).toEqual(expectedText.indexOf(select) + select.length); + }); + + it('selects the right text when multiple tags are present', () => { + const initialValue = `${tag} ${tag} ${selected}`; + textArea.value = initialValue; + const selectedIndex = initialValue.indexOf(selected); + textArea.setSelectionRange(selectedIndex, selectedIndex + selected.length); + insertMarkdownText({ textArea, + text: textArea.value, + tag, + blockTag: null, + selected, + wrap: false, + select }); + + const expectedText = initialValue.replace(selected, `[${selected}](url)`); + expect(textArea.value).toEqual(expectedText); + expect(textArea.selectionStart).toEqual(expectedText.lastIndexOf(select)); + expect(textArea.selectionEnd).toEqual(expectedText.lastIndexOf(select) + select.length); + }); + }); + }); }); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/notes/components/noteable_discussion_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/notes/components/noteable_discussion_spec.js index 2a01bd85520..40b5f009ceb 100644 --- a/spec/javascripts/notes/components/noteable_discussion_spec.js +++ b/spec/javascripts/notes/components/noteable_discussion_spec.js @@ -133,4 +133,29 @@ describe('noteable_discussion component', () => { }); }); }); + + describe('componentData', () => { + it('should return first note object for placeholder note', () => { + const data = { + isPlaceholderNote: true, + notes: [ + { body: 'hello world!' }, + ], + }; + + const note = vm.componentData(data); + expect(note).toEqual(data.notes[0]); + }); + + it('should return given note for nonplaceholder notes', () => { + const data = { + notes: [ + { id: 12 }, + ], + }; + + const note = vm.componentData(data); + expect(note).toEqual(data); + }); + }); }); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/notes/mock_data.js b/spec/javascripts/notes/mock_data.js index 1f030e5af28..9a0e7f34a9c 100644 --- a/spec/javascripts/notes/mock_data.js +++ b/spec/javascripts/notes/mock_data.js @@ -1177,10 +1177,8 @@ export const discussion1 = { file_path: 'about.md', }, position: { - formatter: { - new_line: 50, - old_line: null, - }, + new_line: 50, + old_line: null, }, notes: [ { @@ -1197,10 +1195,8 @@ export const resolvedDiscussion1 = { file_path: 'about.md', }, position: { - formatter: { - new_line: 50, - old_line: null, - }, + new_line: 50, + old_line: null, }, notes: [ { @@ -1217,10 +1213,8 @@ export const discussion2 = { file_path: 'README.md', }, position: { - formatter: { - new_line: null, - old_line: 20, - }, + new_line: null, + old_line: 20, }, notes: [ { @@ -1237,10 +1231,8 @@ export const discussion3 = { file_path: 'README.md', }, position: { - formatter: { - new_line: 21, - old_line: null, - }, + new_line: 21, + old_line: null, }, notes: [ { diff --git a/spec/javascripts/sidebar/components/time_tracking/time_tracker_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/sidebar/components/time_tracking/time_tracker_spec.js index 9dff52a9d49..0e30759c41d 100644 --- a/spec/javascripts/sidebar/components/time_tracking/time_tracker_spec.js +++ b/spec/javascripts/sidebar/components/time_tracking/time_tracker_spec.js @@ -8,7 +8,10 @@ describe('Issuable Time Tracker', () => { let initialData; let vm; - const initTimeTrackingComponent = opts => { + const initTimeTrackingComponent = ({ timeEstimate, + timeSpent, + timeEstimateHumanReadable, + timeSpentHumanReadable }) => { setFixtures(` <div> <div id="mock-container"></div> @@ -16,10 +19,10 @@ describe('Issuable Time Tracker', () => { `); initialData = { - time_estimate: opts.timeEstimate, - time_spent: opts.timeSpent, - human_time_estimate: opts.timeEstimateHumanReadable, - human_time_spent: opts.timeSpentHumanReadable, + timeEstimate, + timeSpent, + humanTimeEstimate: timeEstimateHumanReadable, + humanTimeSpent: timeSpentHumanReadable, rootPath: '/', }; @@ -43,8 +46,8 @@ describe('Issuable Time Tracker', () => { describe('Initialization', () => { beforeEach(() => { initTimeTrackingComponent({ - timeEstimate: 100000, - timeSpent: 5000, + timeEstimate: 10000, // 2h 46m + timeSpent: 5000, // 1h 23m timeEstimateHumanReadable: '2h 46m', timeSpentHumanReadable: '1h 23m', }); @@ -56,14 +59,14 @@ describe('Issuable Time Tracker', () => { it('should correctly set timeEstimate', done => { Vue.nextTick(() => { - expect(vm.timeEstimate).toBe(initialData.time_estimate); + expect(vm.timeEstimate).toBe(initialData.timeEstimate); done(); }); }); it('should correctly set time_spent', done => { Vue.nextTick(() => { - expect(vm.timeSpent).toBe(initialData.time_spent); + expect(vm.timeSpent).toBe(initialData.timeSpent); done(); }); }); @@ -74,8 +77,8 @@ describe('Issuable Time Tracker', () => { describe('Comparison pane', () => { beforeEach(() => { initTimeTrackingComponent({ - timeEstimate: 100000, - timeSpent: 5000, + timeEstimate: 100000, // 1d 3h + timeSpent: 5000, // 1h 23m timeEstimateHumanReadable: '', timeSpentHumanReadable: '', }); @@ -106,8 +109,8 @@ describe('Issuable Time Tracker', () => { }); it('should display the remaining meter with the correct background color when over estimate', done => { - vm.time_estimate = 100000; - vm.time_spent = 20000000; + vm.timeEstimate = 10000; // 2h 46m + vm.timeSpent = 20000000; // 231 days Vue.nextTick(() => { expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.time-tracking-comparison-pane .progress[variant="danger"]')).not.toBeNull(); done(); @@ -119,7 +122,7 @@ describe('Issuable Time Tracker', () => { describe('Estimate only pane', () => { beforeEach(() => { initTimeTrackingComponent({ - timeEstimate: 100000, + timeEstimate: 10000, // 2h 46m timeSpent: 0, timeEstimateHumanReadable: '2h 46m', timeSpentHumanReadable: '', @@ -142,7 +145,7 @@ describe('Issuable Time Tracker', () => { beforeEach(() => { initTimeTrackingComponent({ timeEstimate: 0, - timeSpent: 5000, + timeSpent: 5000, // 1h 23m timeEstimateHumanReadable: '2h 46m', timeSpentHumanReadable: '1h 23m', }); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/ide/components/changed_file_icon_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/changed_file_icon_spec.js index 7308219f705..5b1038840c7 100644 --- a/spec/javascripts/ide/components/changed_file_icon_spec.js +++ b/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/changed_file_icon_spec.js @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ import Vue from 'vue'; -import changedFileIcon from '~/ide/components/changed_file_icon.vue'; +import changedFileIcon from '~/vue_shared/components/changed_file_icon.vue'; import createComponent from 'spec/helpers/vue_mount_component_helper'; -describe('IDE changed file icon', () => { +describe('Changed file icon', () => { let vm; beforeEach(() => { @@ -33,14 +33,14 @@ describe('IDE changed file icon', () => { }); describe('changedIconClass', () => { - it('includes ide-file-modified when not a temp file', () => { - expect(vm.changedIconClass).toContain('ide-file-modified'); + it('includes file-modified when not a temp file', () => { + expect(vm.changedIconClass).toContain('file-modified'); }); - it('includes ide-file-addition when a temp file', () => { + it('includes file-addition when a temp file', () => { vm.file.tempFile = true; - expect(vm.changedIconClass).toContain('ide-file-addition'); + expect(vm.changedIconClass).toContain('file-addition'); }); }); }); diff --git a/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/markdown/field_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/markdown/field_spec.js index 69034975422..0dea9278cc2 100644 --- a/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/markdown/field_spec.js +++ b/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/markdown/field_spec.js @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ describe('Markdown field component', () => { const textarea = vm.$el.querySelector('textarea'); textarea.setSelectionRange(0, 0); - vm.$el.querySelectorAll('.js-md')[4].click(); + vm.$el.querySelectorAll('.js-md')[5].click(); Vue.nextTick(() => { expect( @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ describe('Markdown field component', () => { const textarea = vm.$el.querySelector('textarea'); textarea.setSelectionRange(0, 50); - vm.$el.querySelectorAll('.js-md')[4].click(); + vm.$el.querySelectorAll('.js-md')[5].click(); Vue.nextTick(() => { expect( diff --git a/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/markdown/header_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/markdown/header_spec.js index 488575df401..bc934afe7a4 100644 --- a/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/markdown/header_spec.js +++ b/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/markdown/header_spec.js @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ describe('Markdown field header component', () => { }); it('renders markdown buttons', () => { - expect(vm.$el.querySelectorAll('.js-md').length).toBe(7); + expect(vm.$el.querySelectorAll('.js-md').length).toBe(8); }); it('renders `write` link as active when previewMarkdown is false', () => { diff --git a/spec/lib/backup/manager_spec.rb b/spec/lib/backup/manager_spec.rb index ca319679e80..9633caac788 100644 --- a/spec/lib/backup/manager_spec.rb +++ b/spec/lib/backup/manager_spec.rb @@ -11,10 +11,6 @@ describe Backup::Manager do allow(progress).to receive(:puts) allow(progress).to receive(:print) - allow_any_instance_of(String).to receive(:color) do |string, _color| - string - end - @old_progress = $progress # rubocop:disable Style/GlobalVars $progress = progress # rubocop:disable Style/GlobalVars end diff --git a/spec/lib/backup/repository_spec.rb b/spec/lib/backup/repository_spec.rb index c5a854b5660..fdeea814bb2 100644 --- a/spec/lib/backup/repository_spec.rb +++ b/spec/lib/backup/repository_spec.rb @@ -11,10 +11,6 @@ describe Backup::Repository do allow(FileUtils).to receive(:mkdir_p).and_return(true) allow(FileUtils).to receive(:mv).and_return(true) - allow_any_instance_of(String).to receive(:color) do |string, _color| - string - end - allow_any_instance_of(described_class).to receive(:progress).and_return(progress) end diff --git a/spec/lib/banzai/filter/relative_link_filter_spec.rb b/spec/lib/banzai/filter/relative_link_filter_spec.rb index ba8dc68ceda..ed1ebe9ebf6 100644 --- a/spec/lib/banzai/filter/relative_link_filter_spec.rb +++ b/spec/lib/banzai/filter/relative_link_filter_spec.rb @@ -83,6 +83,11 @@ describe Banzai::Filter::RelativeLinkFilter do expect { filter(act) }.not_to raise_error end + it 'does not raise an exception with a space in the path' do + act = link("/uploads/d18213acd3732630991986120e167e3d/Landscape_8.jpg \nBut here's some more unexpected text :smile:)") + expect { filter(act) }.not_to raise_error + end + it 'ignores ref if commit is passed' do doc = filter(link('non/existent.file'), commit: project.commit('empty-branch') ) expect(doc.at_css('a')['href']) diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/background_migration/deserialize_merge_request_diffs_and_commits_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/background_migration/deserialize_merge_request_diffs_and_commits_spec.rb index 0735ebd6dcb..5dce3fcbcb6 100644 --- a/spec/lib/gitlab/background_migration/deserialize_merge_request_diffs_and_commits_spec.rb +++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/background_migration/deserialize_merge_request_diffs_and_commits_spec.rb @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ require 'spec_helper' describe Gitlab::BackgroundMigration::DeserializeMergeRequestDiffsAndCommits, :migration, schema: 20171114162227 do + include GitHelpers + let(:merge_request_diffs) { table(:merge_request_diffs) } let(:merge_requests) { table(:merge_requests) } @@ -9,11 +11,7 @@ describe Gitlab::BackgroundMigration::DeserializeMergeRequestDiffsAndCommits, :m let(:merge_request) { merge_requests.create!(iid: 1, target_project_id: project.id, source_project_id: project.id, target_branch: 'feature', source_branch: 'master').becomes(MergeRequest) } let(:merge_request_diff) { MergeRequest.find(merge_request.id).create_merge_request_diff } let(:updated_merge_request_diff) { MergeRequestDiff.find(merge_request_diff.id) } - let(:rugged) do - Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do - project.repository.rugged - end - end + let(:rugged) { rugged_repo(project.repository) } before do allow_any_instance_of(MergeRequestDiff) diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/background_migration/encrypt_columns_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/background_migration/encrypt_columns_spec.rb new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2a869446753 --- /dev/null +++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/background_migration/encrypt_columns_spec.rb @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ +require 'spec_helper' + +describe Gitlab::BackgroundMigration::EncryptColumns, :migration, schema: 20180910115836 do + let(:model) { Gitlab::BackgroundMigration::Models::EncryptColumns::WebHook } + let(:web_hooks) { table(:web_hooks) } + + let(:plaintext_attrs) do + { + 'encrypted_token' => nil, + 'encrypted_url' => nil, + 'token' => 'secret', + 'url' => 'http://example.com?access_token=secret' + } + end + + let(:encrypted_attrs) do + { + 'encrypted_token' => be_present, + 'encrypted_url' => be_present, + 'token' => nil, + 'url' => nil + } + end + + describe '#perform' do + it 'encrypts columns for the specified range' do + hooks = web_hooks.create([plaintext_attrs] * 5).sort_by(&:id) + + # Encrypt all but the first and last rows + subject.perform(model, [:token, :url], hooks[1].id, hooks[3].id) + + hooks = web_hooks.where(id: hooks.map(&:id)).order(:id) + + aggregate_failures do + expect(hooks[0]).to have_attributes(plaintext_attrs) + expect(hooks[1]).to have_attributes(encrypted_attrs) + expect(hooks[2]).to have_attributes(encrypted_attrs) + expect(hooks[3]).to have_attributes(encrypted_attrs) + expect(hooks[4]).to have_attributes(plaintext_attrs) + end + end + + it 'acquires an exclusive lock for the update' do + relation = double('relation', each: nil) + + expect(model).to receive(:where) { relation } + expect(relation).to receive(:lock) { relation } + + subject.perform(model, [:token, :url], 1, 1) + end + + it 'skips already-encrypted columns' do + values = { + 'encrypted_token' => 'known encrypted token', + 'encrypted_url' => 'known encrypted url', + 'token' => 'token', + 'url' => 'url' + } + + hook = web_hooks.create(values) + + subject.perform(model, [:token, :url], hook.id, hook.id) + + hook.reload + + expect(hook).to have_attributes(values) + end + end +end diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/background_migration/populate_external_pipeline_source_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/background_migration/populate_external_pipeline_source_spec.rb new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c7b272cd6ca --- /dev/null +++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/background_migration/populate_external_pipeline_source_spec.rb @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ +# frozen_string_literal: true + +require 'spec_helper' + +describe Gitlab::BackgroundMigration::PopulateExternalPipelineSource, :migration, schema: 20180916011959 do + let(:migration) { described_class.new } + + let!(:internal_pipeline) { create(:ci_pipeline, source: :web) } + let(:pipelines) { [internal_pipeline, unknown_pipeline].map(&:id) } + + let!(:unknown_pipeline) do + build(:ci_pipeline, source: :unknown) + .tap { |pipeline| pipeline.save(validate: false) } + end + + subject { migration.perform(pipelines.min, pipelines.max) } + + shared_examples 'no changes' do + it 'does not change the pipeline source' do + expect { subject }.not_to change { unknown_pipeline.reload.source } + end + end + + context 'when unknown pipeline is external' do + before do + create(:generic_commit_status, pipeline: unknown_pipeline) + end + + it 'populates the pipeline source' do + subject + + expect(unknown_pipeline.reload.source).to eq('external') + end + + it 'can be repeated without effect' do + subject + + expect { subject }.not_to change { unknown_pipeline.reload.source } + end + end + + context 'when unknown pipeline has just a build' do + before do + create(:ci_build, pipeline: unknown_pipeline) + end + + it_behaves_like 'no changes' + end + + context 'when unknown pipeline has no statuses' do + it_behaves_like 'no changes' + end + + context 'when unknown pipeline has a build and a status' do + before do + create(:generic_commit_status, pipeline: unknown_pipeline) + create(:ci_build, pipeline: unknown_pipeline) + end + + it_behaves_like 'no changes' + end +end diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/config/entry/reports_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/config/entry/reports_spec.rb index e5fc36b5d7a..7cf541447ce 100644 --- a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/config/entry/reports_spec.rb +++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/config/entry/reports_spec.rb @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Ci::Config::Entry::Reports do where(:keyword, :file) do :junit | 'junit.xml' + :codequality | 'codequality.json' :sast | 'gl-sast-report.json' :dependency_scanning | 'gl-dependency-scanning-report.json' :container_scanning | 'gl-container-scanning-report.json' diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/conflict/file_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/conflict/file_spec.rb index 9095ffbfd52..1bd077ddbdf 100644 --- a/spec/lib/gitlab/conflict/file_spec.rb +++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/conflict/file_spec.rb @@ -1,9 +1,11 @@ require 'spec_helper' describe Gitlab::Conflict::File do + include GitHelpers + let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) } let(:repository) { project.repository } - let(:rugged) { Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access { repository.rugged } } + let(:rugged) { rugged_repo(repository) } let(:their_commit) { rugged.branches['conflict-start'].target } let(:our_commit) { rugged.branches['conflict-resolvable'].target } let(:merge_request) { create(:merge_request, source_branch: 'conflict-resolvable', target_branch: 'conflict-start', source_project: project) } diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/data_builder/pipeline_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/data_builder/pipeline_spec.rb index 9ca960502c8..98f1696badb 100644 --- a/spec/lib/gitlab/data_builder/pipeline_spec.rb +++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/data_builder/pipeline_spec.rb @@ -6,10 +6,10 @@ describe Gitlab::DataBuilder::Pipeline do let(:pipeline) do create(:ci_pipeline, - project: project, - status: 'success', - sha: project.commit.sha, - ref: project.default_branch) + project: project, + status: 'success', + sha: project.commit.sha, + ref: project.default_branch) end let!(:build) { create(:ci_build, pipeline: pipeline) } @@ -20,18 +20,35 @@ describe Gitlab::DataBuilder::Pipeline do let(:build_data) { data[:builds].first } let(:project_data) { data[:project] } - it { expect(attributes).to be_a(Hash) } - it { expect(attributes[:ref]).to eq(pipeline.ref) } - it { expect(attributes[:sha]).to eq(pipeline.sha) } - it { expect(attributes[:tag]).to eq(pipeline.tag) } - it { expect(attributes[:id]).to eq(pipeline.id) } - it { expect(attributes[:status]).to eq(pipeline.status) } - it { expect(attributes[:detailed_status]).to eq('passed') } + it 'has correct attributes' do + expect(attributes).to be_a(Hash) + expect(attributes[:ref]).to eq(pipeline.ref) + expect(attributes[:sha]).to eq(pipeline.sha) + expect(attributes[:tag]).to eq(pipeline.tag) + expect(attributes[:id]).to eq(pipeline.id) + expect(attributes[:status]).to eq(pipeline.status) + expect(attributes[:detailed_status]).to eq('passed') + expect(build_data).to be_a(Hash) + expect(build_data[:id]).to eq(build.id) + expect(build_data[:status]).to eq(build.status) + expect(project_data).to eq(project.hook_attrs(backward: false)) + end - it { expect(build_data).to be_a(Hash) } - it { expect(build_data[:id]).to eq(build.id) } - it { expect(build_data[:status]).to eq(build.status) } + context 'pipeline without variables' do + it 'has empty variables hash' do + expect(attributes[:variables]).to be_a(Array) + expect(attributes[:variables]).to be_empty() + end + end - it { expect(project_data).to eq(project.hook_attrs(backward: false)) } + context 'pipeline with variables' do + let(:build) { create(:ci_build, pipeline: pipeline) } + let(:data) { described_class.build(pipeline) } + let(:attributes) { data[:object_attributes] } + let!(:pipeline_variable) { create(:ci_pipeline_variable, pipeline: pipeline, key: 'TRIGGER_KEY_1', value: 'TRIGGER_VALUE_1') } + + it { expect(attributes[:variables]).to be_a(Array) } + it { expect(attributes[:variables]).to contain_exactly({ key: 'TRIGGER_KEY_1', value: 'TRIGGER_VALUE_1' }) } + end end end diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/highlight_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/highlight_spec.rb index 3c8cf9c56cc..5d0a603d11d 100644 --- a/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/highlight_spec.rb +++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/highlight_spec.rb @@ -8,6 +8,20 @@ describe Gitlab::Diff::Highlight do let(:diff) { commit.raw_diffs.first } let(:diff_file) { Gitlab::Diff::File.new(diff, diff_refs: commit.diff_refs, repository: project.repository) } + shared_examples 'without inline diffs' do + let(:code) { '<h2 onmouseover="alert(2)">Test</h2>' } + + before do + allow(Gitlab::Diff::InlineDiff).to receive(:for_lines).and_return([]) + allow_any_instance_of(Gitlab::Diff::Line).to receive(:text).and_return(code) + end + + it 'returns html escaped diff text' do + expect(subject[1].rich_text).to eq html_escape(code) + expect(subject[1].rich_text).to be_html_safe + end + end + describe '#highlight' do context "with a diff file" do let(:subject) { described_class.new(diff_file, repository: project.repository).highlight } @@ -38,6 +52,16 @@ describe Gitlab::Diff::Highlight do expect(subject[5].rich_text).to eq(code) end + + context 'when no diff_refs' do + before do + allow(diff_file).to receive(:diff_refs).and_return(nil) + end + + context 'when no inline diffs' do + it_behaves_like 'without inline diffs' + end + end end context "with diff lines" do @@ -93,6 +117,10 @@ describe Gitlab::Diff::Highlight do expect { subject }. to raise_exception(RangeError) end end + + context 'when no inline diffs' do + it_behaves_like 'without inline diffs' + end end end end diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/position_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/position_spec.rb index 677eb373d22..2d94356f386 100644 --- a/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/position_spec.rb +++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/position_spec.rb @@ -5,6 +5,34 @@ describe Gitlab::Diff::Position do let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) } + let(:args_for_img) do + { + old_path: "files/any.img", + new_path: "files/any.img", + base_sha: nil, + head_sha: nil, + start_sha: nil, + width: 100, + height: 100, + x: 1, + y: 100, + position_type: "image" + } + end + + let(:args_for_text) do + { + old_path: "files/ruby/popen.rb", + new_path: "files/ruby/popen.rb", + old_line: nil, + new_line: 14, + base_sha: nil, + head_sha: nil, + start_sha: nil, + position_type: "text" + } + end + describe "position for an added text file" do let(:commit) { project.commit("2ea1f3dec713d940208fb5ce4a38765ecb5d3f73") } @@ -529,53 +557,49 @@ describe Gitlab::Diff::Position do end end + describe "#as_json" do + shared_examples "diff position json" do + let(:diff_position) { described_class.new(args) } + + it "returns the position as JSON" do + expect(diff_position.as_json).to eq(args.stringify_keys) + end + end + + context "for text positon" do + let(:args) { args_for_text } + + it_behaves_like "diff position json" + end + + context "for image positon" do + let(:args) { args_for_img } + + it_behaves_like "diff position json" + end + end + describe "#to_json" do shared_examples "diff position json" do + let(:diff_position) { described_class.new(args) } + it "returns the position as JSON" do - expect(JSON.parse(diff_position.to_json)).to eq(hash.stringify_keys) + expect(JSON.parse(diff_position.to_json)).to eq(args.stringify_keys) end it "works when nested under another hash" do - expect(JSON.parse(JSON.generate(pos: diff_position))).to eq('pos' => hash.stringify_keys) + expect(JSON.parse(JSON.generate(pos: diff_position))).to eq('pos' => args.stringify_keys) end end context "for text positon" do - let(:hash) do - { - old_path: "files/ruby/popen.rb", - new_path: "files/ruby/popen.rb", - old_line: nil, - new_line: 14, - base_sha: nil, - head_sha: nil, - start_sha: nil, - position_type: "text" - } - end - - let(:diff_position) { described_class.new(hash) } + let(:args) { args_for_text } it_behaves_like "diff position json" end context "for image positon" do - let(:hash) do - { - old_path: "files/any.img", - new_path: "files/any.img", - base_sha: nil, - head_sha: nil, - start_sha: nil, - width: 100, - height: 100, - x: 1, - y: 100, - position_type: "image" - } - end - - let(:diff_position) { described_class.new(hash) } + let(:args) { args_for_img } it_behaves_like "diff position json" end diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/blob_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/git/blob_spec.rb index ea49502ae2e..b243f0dacae 100644 --- a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/blob_spec.rb +++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/git/blob_spec.rb @@ -4,6 +4,9 @@ require "spec_helper" describe Gitlab::Git::Blob, :seed_helper do let(:repository) { Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_REPO_PATH, '') } + let(:rugged) do + Rugged::Repository.new(File.join(TestEnv.repos_path, TEST_REPO_PATH)) + end describe 'initialize' do let(:blob) { Gitlab::Git::Blob.new(name: 'test') } @@ -139,9 +142,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Blob, :seed_helper do it 'limits the size of a large file' do blob_size = Gitlab::Git::Blob::MAX_DATA_DISPLAY_SIZE + 1 buffer = Array.new(blob_size, 0) - rugged_blob = Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do - Rugged::Blob.from_buffer(repository.rugged, buffer.join('')) - end + rugged_blob = Rugged::Blob.from_buffer(rugged, buffer.join('')) blob = Gitlab::Git::Blob.raw(repository, rugged_blob) expect(blob.size).to eq(blob_size) @@ -156,9 +157,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Blob, :seed_helper do context 'when sha references a tree' do it 'returns nil' do - tree = Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do - repository.rugged.rev_parse('master^{tree}') - end + tree = rugged.rev_parse('master^{tree}') blob = Gitlab::Git::Blob.raw(repository, tree.oid) @@ -262,11 +261,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Blob, :seed_helper do end describe '.batch_lfs_pointers' do - let(:tree_object) do - Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do - repository.rugged.rev_parse('master^{tree}') - end - end + let(:tree_object) { rugged.rev_parse('master^{tree}') } let(:non_lfs_blob) do Gitlab::Git::Blob.find( diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/branch_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/git/branch_spec.rb index 79ccbb79966..0df282d0ae3 100644 --- a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/branch_spec.rb +++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/git/branch_spec.rb @@ -3,9 +3,7 @@ require "spec_helper" describe Gitlab::Git::Branch, :seed_helper do let(:repository) { Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_REPO_PATH, '') } let(:rugged) do - Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do - repository.rugged - end + Rugged::Repository.new(File.join(TestEnv.repos_path, repository.relative_path)) end subject { repository.branches } @@ -74,9 +72,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Branch, :seed_helper do Gitlab::Git.committer_hash(email: user.email, name: user.name) end let(:params) do - parents = Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do - [repository.rugged.head.target] - end + parents = [rugged.head.target] tree = parents.first.tree { diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/commit_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/git/commit_spec.rb index 2718a3c5e49..9ef27081f98 100644 --- a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/commit_spec.rb +++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/git/commit_spec.rb @@ -1,19 +1,17 @@ require "spec_helper" describe Gitlab::Git::Commit, :seed_helper do + include GitHelpers + let(:repository) { Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_REPO_PATH, '') } - let(:commit) { described_class.find(repository, SeedRepo::Commit::ID) } - let(:rugged_commit) do - Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do - repository.rugged.lookup(SeedRepo::Commit::ID) - end + let(:rugged_repo) do + Rugged::Repository.new(File.join(TestEnv.repos_path, TEST_REPO_PATH)) end + let(:commit) { described_class.find(repository, SeedRepo::Commit::ID) } + let(:rugged_commit) { rugged_repo.lookup(SeedRepo::Commit::ID) } + describe "Commit info" do before do - repo = Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do - Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_REPO_PATH, '').rugged - end - @committer = { email: 'mike@smith.com', name: "Mike Smith", @@ -26,12 +24,12 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Commit, :seed_helper do time: Time.now } - @parents = [repo.head.target] + @parents = [rugged_repo.head.target] @gitlab_parents = @parents.map { |c| described_class.find(repository, c.oid) } @tree = @parents.first.tree sha = Rugged::Commit.create( - repo, + rugged_repo, author: @author, committer: @committer, tree: @tree, @@ -40,7 +38,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Commit, :seed_helper do update_ref: "HEAD" ) - @raw_commit = repo.lookup(sha) + @raw_commit = rugged_repo.lookup(sha) @commit = described_class.find(repository, sha) end @@ -61,10 +59,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Commit, :seed_helper do after do # Erase the new commit so other tests get the original repo - repo = Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do - Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_REPO_PATH, '').rugged - end - repo.references.update("refs/heads/master", SeedRepo::LastCommit::ID) + rugged_repo.references.update("refs/heads/master", SeedRepo::LastCommit::ID) end end @@ -120,9 +115,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Commit, :seed_helper do describe '.find' do it "should return first head commit if without params" do expect(described_class.last(repository).id).to eq( - Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do - repository.rugged.head.target.oid - end + rugged_repo.head.target.oid ) end diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/diff_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/git/diff_spec.rb index 27d803e0117..8a4415506c4 100644 --- a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/diff_spec.rb +++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/git/diff_spec.rb @@ -64,9 +64,22 @@ EOT end end - context 'using a Rugged::Patch' do + context 'using a GitalyClient::Diff' do + let(:gitaly_diff) do + Gitlab::GitalyClient::Diff.new( + to_path: ".gitmodules", + from_path: ".gitmodules", + old_mode: 0100644, + new_mode: 0100644, + from_id: '357406f3075a57708d0163752905cc1576fceacc', + to_id: '8e5177d718c561d36efde08bad36b43687ee6bf0', + patch: raw_patch + ) + end + let(:diff) { described_class.new(gitaly_diff) } + context 'with a small diff' do - let(:diff) { described_class.new(gitaly_diff) } + let(:raw_patch) { @raw_diff_hash[:diff] } it 'initializes the diff' do expect(diff.to_hash).to eq(@raw_diff_hash) @@ -78,16 +91,17 @@ EOT end context 'using a diff that is too large' do - it 'prunes the diff' do - gitaly_diff.too_large = true - diff = described_class.new(gitaly_diff) + let(:raw_patch) { 'a' * 204800 } + it 'prunes the diff' do expect(diff.diff).to be_empty expect(diff).to be_too_large end end context 'using a collapsable diff that is too large' do + let(:raw_patch) { 'a' * 204800 } + it 'prunes the diff as a large diff instead of as a collapsed diff' do gitaly_diff.too_large = true diff = described_class.new(gitaly_diff, expanded: false) @@ -97,43 +111,6 @@ EOT expect(diff).not_to be_collapsed end end - end - - context 'using a GitalyClient::Diff' do - let(:diff) do - described_class.new( - Gitlab::GitalyClient::Diff.new( - to_path: ".gitmodules", - from_path: ".gitmodules", - old_mode: 0100644, - new_mode: 0100644, - from_id: '357406f3075a57708d0163752905cc1576fceacc', - to_id: '8e5177d718c561d36efde08bad36b43687ee6bf0', - patch: raw_patch - ) - ) - end - - context 'with a small diff' do - let(:raw_patch) { @raw_diff_hash[:diff] } - - it 'initializes the diff' do - expect(diff.to_hash).to eq(@raw_diff_hash) - end - - it 'does not prune the diff' do - expect(diff).not_to be_too_large - end - end - - context 'using a diff that is too large' do - let(:raw_patch) { 'a' * 204800 } - - it 'prunes the diff' do - expect(diff.diff).to be_empty - expect(diff).to be_too_large - end - end context 'when the patch passed is not UTF-8-encoded' do let(:raw_patch) { @raw_diff_hash[:diff].encode(Encoding::ASCII_8BIT) } diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/repository_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/git/repository_spec.rb index d02536a2fb4..51eb997a325 100644 --- a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/repository_spec.rb +++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/git/repository_spec.rb @@ -19,7 +19,10 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do end end + let(:mutable_repository) { Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_MUTABLE_REPO_PATH, '') } let(:repository) { Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_REPO_PATH, '') } + let(:repository_path) { File.join(TestEnv.repos_path, repository.relative_path) } + let(:repository_rugged) { Rugged::Repository.new(repository_path) } let(:storage_path) { TestEnv.repos_path } let(:user) { build(:user) } @@ -71,7 +74,6 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do describe "Respond to" do subject { repository } - it { is_expected.to respond_to(:rugged) } it { is_expected.to respond_to(:root_ref) } it { is_expected.to respond_to(:tags) } end @@ -91,57 +93,6 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do end end - describe "#rugged" do - describe 'when storage is broken', :broken_storage do - it 'raises a storage exception when storage is not available' do - broken_repo = described_class.new('broken', 'a/path.git', '') - - expect { broken_repo.rugged }.to raise_error(Gitlab::Git::Storage::Inaccessible) - end - end - - it 'raises a no repository exception when there is no repo' do - broken_repo = described_class.new('default', 'a/path.git', '') - - expect do - Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access { broken_repo.rugged } - end.to raise_error(Gitlab::Git::Repository::NoRepository) - end - - describe 'alternates keyword argument' do - context 'with no Git env stored' do - before do - allow(Gitlab::Git::HookEnv).to receive(:all).and_return({}) - end - - it "is passed an empty array" do - expect(Rugged::Repository).to receive(:new).with(repository_path, alternates: []) - - repository_rugged - end - end - - context 'with absolute and relative Git object dir envvars stored' do - before do - allow(Gitlab::Git::HookEnv).to receive(:all).and_return({ - 'GIT_OBJECT_DIRECTORY_RELATIVE' => './objects/foo', - 'GIT_ALTERNATE_OBJECT_DIRECTORIES_RELATIVE' => ['./objects/bar', './objects/baz'], - 'GIT_OBJECT_DIRECTORY' => 'ignored', - 'GIT_ALTERNATE_OBJECT_DIRECTORIES' => %w[ignored ignored], - 'GIT_OTHER' => 'another_env' - }) - end - - it "is passed the relative object dir envvars after being converted to absolute ones" do - alternates = %w[foo bar baz].map { |d| File.join(repository_path, './objects', d) } - expect(Rugged::Repository).to receive(:new).with(repository_path, alternates: alternates) - - repository_rugged - end - end - end - end - describe '#branch_names' do subject { repository.branch_names } @@ -284,7 +235,6 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do end describe '#submodule_url_for' do - let(:repository) { Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_REPO_PATH, '') } let(:ref) { 'master' } def submodule_url(path) @@ -336,7 +286,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do it { expect(repository.has_local_branches?).to eq(true) } context 'mutable' do - let(:repository) { Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_MUTABLE_REPO_PATH, '') } + let(:repository) { mutable_repository } after do ensure_seeds @@ -369,7 +319,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do end describe "#delete_branch" do - let(:repository) { Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_MUTABLE_REPO_PATH, '') } + let(:repository) { mutable_repository } after do ensure_seeds @@ -393,7 +343,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do end describe "#create_branch" do - let(:repository) { Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_MUTABLE_REPO_PATH, '') } + let(:repository) { mutable_repository } after do ensure_seeds @@ -418,39 +368,33 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do end describe '#delete_refs' do - let(:repo) { Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_MUTABLE_REPO_PATH, '') } - - def repo_rugged - Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do - repo.rugged - end - end + let(:repository) { mutable_repository } after do ensure_seeds end it 'deletes the ref' do - repo.delete_refs('refs/heads/feature') + repository.delete_refs('refs/heads/feature') - expect(repo_rugged.references['refs/heads/feature']).to be_nil + expect(repository_rugged.references['refs/heads/feature']).to be_nil end it 'deletes all refs' do refs = %w[refs/heads/wip refs/tags/v1.1.0] - repo.delete_refs(*refs) + repository.delete_refs(*refs) refs.each do |ref| - expect(repo_rugged.references[ref]).to be_nil + expect(repository_rugged.references[ref]).to be_nil end end it 'does not fail when deleting an empty list of refs' do - expect { repo.delete_refs(*[]) }.not_to raise_error + expect { repository.delete_refs(*[]) }.not_to raise_error end it 'raises an error if it failed' do - expect { repo.delete_refs('refs\heads\fix') }.to raise_error(Gitlab::Git::Repository::GitError) + expect { repository.delete_refs('refs\heads\fix') }.to raise_error(Gitlab::Git::Repository::GitError) end end @@ -528,9 +472,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do end def new_repository_path - Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do - new_repository.path - end + File.join(TestEnv.repos_path, new_repository.relative_path) end end @@ -577,18 +519,16 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do Gitlab::Git::Commit.find(repository, @rename_commit_id) end - before(:context) do + before do # Add new commits so that there's a renamed file in the commit history - repo = Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_REPO_PATH, '').rugged - @commit_with_old_name_id = new_commit_edit_old_file(repo).oid - @rename_commit_id = new_commit_move_file(repo).oid - @commit_with_new_name_id = new_commit_edit_new_file(repo).oid + @commit_with_old_name_id = new_commit_edit_old_file(repository_rugged).oid + @rename_commit_id = new_commit_move_file(repository_rugged).oid + @commit_with_new_name_id = new_commit_edit_new_file(repository_rugged).oid end - after(:context) do + after do # Erase our commits so other tests get the original repo - repo = Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_REPO_PATH, '').rugged - repo.references.update("refs/heads/master", SeedRepo::LastCommit::ID) + repository_rugged.references.update("refs/heads/master", SeedRepo::LastCommit::ID) end context "where 'follow' == true" do @@ -1010,12 +950,10 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do subject { repository.branches } context 'with local and remote branches' do - let(:repository) do - Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_MUTABLE_REPO_PATH, '') - end + let(:repository) { mutable_repository } before do - create_remote_branch(repository, 'joe', 'remote_branch', 'master') + create_remote_branch('joe', 'remote_branch', 'master') repository.create_branch('local_branch', 'master') end @@ -1038,12 +976,10 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do end context 'with local and remote branches' do - let(:repository) do - Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_MUTABLE_REPO_PATH, '') - end + let(:repository) { mutable_repository } before do - create_remote_branch(repository, 'joe', 'remote_branch', 'master') + create_remote_branch('joe', 'remote_branch', 'master') repository.create_branch('local_branch', 'master') end @@ -1303,24 +1239,24 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do end describe '#local_branches' do - before(:all) do - @repo = Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_MUTABLE_REPO_PATH, '') + let(:repository) { mutable_repository } + + before do + create_remote_branch('joe', 'remote_branch', 'master') + repository.create_branch('local_branch', 'master') end - after(:all) do + after do ensure_seeds end it 'returns the local branches' do - create_remote_branch(@repo, 'joe', 'remote_branch', 'master') - @repo.create_branch('local_branch', 'master') - - expect(@repo.local_branches.any? { |branch| branch.name == 'remote_branch' }).to eq(false) - expect(@repo.local_branches.any? { |branch| branch.name == 'local_branch' }).to eq(true) + expect(repository.local_branches.any? { |branch| branch.name == 'remote_branch' }).to eq(false) + expect(repository.local_branches.any? { |branch| branch.name == 'local_branch' }).to eq(true) end it 'returns a Branch with UTF-8 fields' do - branches = @repo.local_branches.to_a + branches = repository.local_branches.to_a expect(branches.size).to be > 0 branches.each do |branch| expect(branch.name).to be_utf8 @@ -1331,11 +1267,11 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do it 'gets the branches from GitalyClient' do expect_any_instance_of(Gitlab::GitalyClient::RefService).to receive(:local_branches) .and_return([]) - @repo.local_branches + repository.local_branches end it_behaves_like 'wrapping gRPC errors', Gitlab::GitalyClient::RefService, :local_branches do - subject { @repo.local_branches } + subject { repository.local_branches } end end @@ -1391,8 +1327,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do describe '#fetch_source_branch!' do let(:local_ref) { 'refs/merge-requests/1/head' } - let(:repository) { Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_REPO_PATH, '') } - let(:source_repository) { Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_MUTABLE_REPO_PATH, '') } + let(:source_repository) { mutable_repository } after do ensure_seeds @@ -1401,7 +1336,8 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do context 'when the branch exists' do context 'when the commit does not exist locally' do let(:source_branch) { 'new-branch-for-fetch-source-branch' } - let(:source_rugged) { Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access { source_repository.rugged } } + let(:source_path) { File.join(TestEnv.repos_path, source_repository.relative_path) } + let(:source_rugged) { Rugged::Repository.new(source_path) } let(:new_oid) { new_commit_edit_old_file(source_rugged).oid } before do @@ -1513,8 +1449,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do end describe '#set_config' do - let(:repository) { Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_MUTABLE_REPO_PATH, '') } - let(:rugged) { repository_rugged } + let(:repository) { mutable_repository } let(:entries) do { 'test.foo1' => 'bla bla', @@ -1526,19 +1461,18 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do it 'can set config settings' do expect(repository.set_config(entries)).to be_nil - expect(rugged.config['test.foo1']).to eq('bla bla') - expect(rugged.config['test.foo2']).to eq('1234') - expect(rugged.config['test.foo3']).to eq('true') + expect(repository_rugged.config['test.foo1']).to eq('bla bla') + expect(repository_rugged.config['test.foo2']).to eq('1234') + expect(repository_rugged.config['test.foo3']).to eq('true') end after do - entries.keys.each { |k| rugged.config.delete(k) } + entries.keys.each { |k| repository_rugged.config.delete(k) } end end describe '#delete_config' do - let(:repository) { Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_MUTABLE_REPO_PATH, '') } - let(:rugged) { repository_rugged } + let(:repository) { mutable_repository } let(:entries) do { 'test.foo1' => 'bla bla', @@ -1549,21 +1483,19 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do it 'can delete config settings' do entries.each do |key, value| - rugged.config[key] = value + repository_rugged.config[key] = value end expect(repository.delete_config(*%w[does.not.exist test.foo1 test.foo2])).to be_nil - config_keys = rugged.config.each_key.to_a + config_keys = repository_rugged.config.each_key.to_a expect(config_keys).not_to include('test.foo1') expect(config_keys).not_to include('test.foo2') end end describe '#merge' do - let(:repository) do - Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_MUTABLE_REPO_PATH, '') - end + let(:repository) { mutable_repository } let(:source_sha) { '913c66a37b4a45b9769037c55c2d238bd0942d2e' } let(:target_branch) { 'test-merge-target-branch' } @@ -1602,9 +1534,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do end describe '#ff_merge' do - let(:repository) do - Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_MUTABLE_REPO_PATH, '') - end + let(:repository) { mutable_repository } let(:branch_head) { '6d394385cf567f80a8fd85055db1ab4c5295806f' } let(:source_sha) { 'cfe32cf61b73a0d5e9f13e774abde7ff789b1660' } let(:target_branch) { 'test-ff-target-branch' } @@ -1667,9 +1597,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do end describe '#delete_all_refs_except' do - let(:repository) do - Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_MUTABLE_REPO_PATH, '') - end + let(:repository) { mutable_repository } before do repository.write_ref("refs/delete/a", "0b4bc9a49b562e85de7cc9e834518ea6828729b9") @@ -1693,12 +1621,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do end describe 'remotes' do - let(:repository) do - Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_MUTABLE_REPO_PATH, '') - end - let(:rugged) do - Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access { repository.rugged } - end + let(:repository) { mutable_repository } let(:remote_name) { 'my-remote' } let(:url) { 'http://my-repo.git' } @@ -1711,26 +1634,26 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do it 'added the remote' do begin - rugged.remotes.delete(remote_name) + repository_rugged.remotes.delete(remote_name) rescue Rugged::ConfigError end repository.add_remote(remote_name, url, mirror_refmap: mirror_refmap) - expect(rugged.remotes[remote_name]).not_to be_nil - expect(rugged.config["remote.#{remote_name}.mirror"]).to eq('true') - expect(rugged.config["remote.#{remote_name}.prune"]).to eq('true') - expect(rugged.config["remote.#{remote_name}.fetch"]).to eq(mirror_refmap) + expect(repository_rugged.remotes[remote_name]).not_to be_nil + expect(repository_rugged.config["remote.#{remote_name}.mirror"]).to eq('true') + expect(repository_rugged.config["remote.#{remote_name}.prune"]).to eq('true') + expect(repository_rugged.config["remote.#{remote_name}.fetch"]).to eq(mirror_refmap) end end describe '#remove_remote' do it 'removes the remote' do - rugged.remotes.create(remote_name, url) + repository_rugged.remotes.create(remote_name, url) repository.remove_remote(remote_name) - expect(rugged.remotes[remote_name]).to be_nil + expect(repository_rugged.remotes[remote_name]).to be_nil end end end @@ -1901,13 +1824,11 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do end context 'when the diff contains a rename' do - let(:repo) { Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_REPO_PATH, '').rugged } - let(:end_sha) { new_commit_move_file(repo).oid } + let(:end_sha) { new_commit_move_file(repository_rugged).oid } after do # Erase our commits so other tests get the original repo - repo = Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_REPO_PATH, '').rugged - repo.references.update('refs/heads/master', SeedRepo::LastCommit::ID) + repository_rugged.references.update('refs/heads/master', SeedRepo::LastCommit::ID) end it 'does not include the renamed file in the sparse checkout' do @@ -1954,10 +1875,9 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do end end - def create_remote_branch(repository, remote_name, branch_name, source_branch_name) + def create_remote_branch(remote_name, branch_name, source_branch_name) source_branch = repository.branches.find { |branch| branch.name == source_branch_name } - rugged = repository_rugged - rugged.references.create("refs/remotes/#{remote_name}/#{branch_name}", source_branch.dereferenced_target.sha) + repository_rugged.references.create("refs/remotes/#{remote_name}/#{branch_name}", source_branch.dereferenced_target.sha) end # Build the options hash that's passed to Rugged::Commit#create @@ -2035,16 +1955,4 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do line.split("\t").last end end - - def repository_rugged - Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do - repository.rugged - end - end - - def repository_path - Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do - repository.path - end - end end diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/git_access_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/git_access_spec.rb index dbd64c4bec0..e7da5565c26 100644 --- a/spec/lib/gitlab/git_access_spec.rb +++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/git_access_spec.rb @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ require 'spec_helper' describe Gitlab::GitAccess do include TermsHelper + include GitHelpers let(:user) { create(:user) } @@ -736,21 +737,19 @@ describe Gitlab::GitAccess do def merge_into_protected_branch @protected_branch_merge_commit ||= begin - Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do - project.repository.add_branch(user, unprotected_branch, 'feature') - rugged = project.repository.rugged - target_branch = rugged.rev_parse('feature') - source_branch = project.repository.create_file( - user, - 'filename', - 'This is the file content', - message: 'This is a good commit message', - branch_name: unprotected_branch) - author = { email: "email@example.com", time: Time.now, name: "Example Git User" } - - merge_index = rugged.merge_commits(target_branch, source_branch) - Rugged::Commit.create(rugged, author: author, committer: author, message: "commit message", parents: [target_branch, source_branch], tree: merge_index.write_tree(rugged)) - end + project.repository.add_branch(user, unprotected_branch, 'feature') + rugged = rugged_repo(project.repository) + target_branch = rugged.rev_parse('feature') + source_branch = project.repository.create_file( + user, + 'filename', + 'This is the file content', + message: 'This is a good commit message', + branch_name: unprotected_branch) + author = { email: "email@example.com", time: Time.now, name: "Example Git User" } + + merge_index = rugged.merge_commits(target_branch, source_branch) + Rugged::Commit.create(rugged, author: author, committer: author, message: "commit message", parents: [target_branch, source_branch], tree: merge_index.write_tree(rugged)) end end diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/wiki_service_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/wiki_service_spec.rb index 5f67fe6b952..d82c9c28da0 100644 --- a/spec/lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/wiki_service_spec.rb +++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/wiki_service_spec.rb @@ -39,6 +39,10 @@ describe Gitlab::GitalyClient::WikiService do expect(wiki_page.title).to eq('My Page') expect(wiki_page.raw_data).to eq('ab') expect(wiki_page_version.format).to eq('markdown') + + expect(wiki_page.title).to be_utf8 + expect(wiki_page.path).to be_utf8 + expect(wiki_page.name).to be_utf8 end end diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/highlight_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/highlight_spec.rb index 29e61d15726..88f7099ff3c 100644 --- a/spec/lib/gitlab/highlight_spec.rb +++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/highlight_spec.rb @@ -56,5 +56,22 @@ describe Gitlab::Highlight do described_class.highlight('file.name', 'Contents') end + + context 'timeout' do + subject { described_class.new('file.name', 'Contents') } + + it 'utilizes timeout for web' do + expect(Timeout).to receive(:timeout).with(described_class::TIMEOUT_FOREGROUND).and_call_original + + subject.highlight("Content") + end + + it 'utilizes longer timeout for sidekiq' do + allow(Sidekiq).to receive(:server?).and_return(true) + expect(Timeout).to receive(:timeout).with(described_class::TIMEOUT_BACKGROUND).and_call_original + + subject.highlight("Content") + end + end end end diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/relation_factory_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/relation_factory_spec.rb index cf9e0f71910..a31f77484d8 100644 --- a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/relation_factory_spec.rb +++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/relation_factory_spec.rb @@ -191,9 +191,7 @@ describe Gitlab::ImportExport::RelationFactory do "author" => { "name" => "Administrator" }, - "events" => [ - - ] + "events" => [] } end diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/api_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/api_spec.rb index 25c3b37753d..9200724ed23 100644 --- a/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/api_spec.rb +++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/api_spec.rb @@ -150,6 +150,43 @@ describe Gitlab::Kubernetes::Helm::Api do end end + describe '#update' do + let(:rbac) { false } + + let(:command) do + Gitlab::Kubernetes::Helm::UpgradeCommand.new( + application_name, + chart: 'chart-name', + files: files, + rbac: rbac + ) + end + + before do + allow(namespace).to receive(:ensure_exists!).once + + allow(client).to receive(:update_config_map).and_return(nil) + allow(client).to receive(:create_pod).and_return(nil) + end + + it 'ensures the namespace exists before creating the pod' do + expect(namespace).to receive(:ensure_exists!).once.ordered + expect(client).to receive(:create_pod).once.ordered + + subject.update(command) + end + + it 'updates the config map on kubeclient when one exists' do + resource = Gitlab::Kubernetes::ConfigMap.new( + application_name, files + ).generate + + expect(client).to receive(:update_config_map).with(resource).once + + subject.update(command) + end + end + describe '#status' do let(:phase) { Gitlab::Kubernetes::Pod::RUNNING } let(:pod) { Kubeclient::Resource.new(status: { phase: phase }) } # partial representation @@ -179,4 +216,25 @@ describe Gitlab::Kubernetes::Helm::Api do subject.delete_pod!(command.pod_name) end end + + describe '#get_config_map' do + before do + allow(namespace).to receive(:ensure_exists!).once + allow(client).to receive(:get_config_map).and_return(nil) + end + + it 'ensures the namespace exists before retrieving the config map' do + expect(namespace).to receive(:ensure_exists!).once + + subject.get_config_map('example-config-map-name') + end + + it 'gets the config map on kubeclient' do + expect(client).to receive(:get_config_map) + .with('example-config-map-name', namespace.name) + .once + + subject.get_config_map('example-config-map-name') + end + end end diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/upgrade_command_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/upgrade_command_spec.rb new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3dabf04413e --- /dev/null +++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/upgrade_command_spec.rb @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@ +# frozen_string_literal: true + +require 'rails_helper' + +describe Gitlab::Kubernetes::Helm::UpgradeCommand do + let(:application) { build(:clusters_applications_prometheus) } + let(:files) { { 'ca.pem': 'some file content' } } + let(:namespace) { ::Gitlab::Kubernetes::Helm::NAMESPACE } + let(:rbac) { false } + let(:upgrade_command) do + described_class.new( + application.name, + chart: application.chart, + files: files, + rbac: rbac + ) + end + + subject { upgrade_command } + + it_behaves_like 'helm commands' do + let(:commands) do + <<~EOS + helm init --client-only >/dev/null + helm upgrade #{application.name} #{application.chart} --tls --tls-ca-cert /data/helm/#{application.name}/config/ca.pem --tls-cert /data/helm/#{application.name}/config/cert.pem --tls-key /data/helm/#{application.name}/config/key.pem --reset-values --install --namespace #{namespace} -f /data/helm/#{application.name}/config/values.yaml >/dev/null + EOS + end + end + + context 'rbac is true' do + let(:rbac) { true } + + it_behaves_like 'helm commands' do + let(:commands) do + <<~EOS + helm init --client-only >/dev/null + helm upgrade #{application.name} #{application.chart} --tls --tls-ca-cert /data/helm/#{application.name}/config/ca.pem --tls-cert /data/helm/#{application.name}/config/cert.pem --tls-key /data/helm/#{application.name}/config/key.pem --reset-values --install --namespace #{namespace} -f /data/helm/#{application.name}/config/values.yaml >/dev/null + EOS + end + end + end + + context 'with an application with a repository' do + let(:ci_runner) { create(:ci_runner) } + let(:application) { build(:clusters_applications_runner, runner: ci_runner) } + let(:upgrade_command) do + described_class.new( + application.name, + chart: application.chart, + files: files, + rbac: rbac, + repository: application.repository + ) + end + + it_behaves_like 'helm commands' do + let(:commands) do + <<~EOS + helm init --client-only >/dev/null + helm repo add #{application.name} #{application.repository} + helm upgrade #{application.name} #{application.chart} --tls --tls-ca-cert /data/helm/#{application.name}/config/ca.pem --tls-cert /data/helm/#{application.name}/config/cert.pem --tls-key /data/helm/#{application.name}/config/key.pem --reset-values --install --namespace #{namespace} -f /data/helm/#{application.name}/config/values.yaml >/dev/null + EOS + end + end + end + + context 'when there is no ca.pem file' do + let(:files) { { 'file.txt': 'some content' } } + + it_behaves_like 'helm commands' do + let(:commands) do + <<~EOS + helm init --client-only >/dev/null + helm upgrade #{application.name} #{application.chart} --reset-values --install --namespace #{namespace} -f /data/helm/#{application.name}/config/values.yaml >/dev/null + EOS + end + end + end + + describe '#pod_resource' do + subject { upgrade_command.pod_resource } + + context 'rbac is enabled' do + let(:rbac) { true } + + it 'generates a pod that uses the tiller serviceAccountName' do + expect(subject.spec.serviceAccountName).to eq('tiller') + end + end + + context 'rbac is not enabled' do + let(:rbac) { false } + + it 'generates a pod that uses the default serviceAccountName' do + expect(subject.spec.serviceAcccountName).to be_nil + end + end + end + + describe '#config_map_resource' do + let(:metadata) do + { + name: "values-content-configuration-#{application.name}", + namespace: namespace, + labels: { name: "values-content-configuration-#{application.name}" } + } + end + let(:resource) { ::Kubeclient::Resource.new(metadata: metadata, data: files) } + + it 'returns a KubeClient resource with config map content for the application' do + expect(subject.config_map_resource).to eq(resource) + end + end + + describe '#rbac?' do + subject { upgrade_command.rbac? } + + context 'rbac is enabled' do + let(:rbac) { true } + + it { is_expected.to be_truthy } + end + + context 'rbac is not enabled' do + let(:rbac) { false } + + it { is_expected.to be_falsey } + end + end + + describe '#pod_name' do + it 'returns the pod name' do + expect(subject.pod_name).to eq("upgrade-#{application.name}") + end + end +end diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/usage_data_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/usage_data_spec.rb index 1ec1fe10744..d669c42ab4a 100644 --- a/spec/lib/gitlab/usage_data_spec.rb +++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/usage_data_spec.rb @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ describe Gitlab::UsageData do git database avg_cycle_analytics + web_ide_commits )) end diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/web_ide_commits_counter_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/web_ide_commits_counter_spec.rb new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c51889a1c63 --- /dev/null +++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/web_ide_commits_counter_spec.rb @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +# frozen_string_literal: true + +require 'spec_helper' + +describe Gitlab::WebIdeCommitsCounter, :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state do + describe '.increment' do + it 'increments the web ide commits counter by 1' do + expect do + described_class.increment + end.to change { described_class.total_count }.from(0).to(1) + end + end + + describe '.total_count' do + it 'returns the total amount of web ide commits' do + expect(described_class.total_count).to eq(0) + end + end +end diff --git a/spec/models/application_setting_spec.rb b/spec/models/application_setting_spec.rb index 9647c1b9f63..dcfc80daa57 100644 --- a/spec/models/application_setting_spec.rb +++ b/spec/models/application_setting_spec.rb @@ -592,4 +592,19 @@ describe ApplicationSetting do it { is_expected.to eq(result) } end end + + context 'diff limit settings' do + describe '#diff_max_patch_bytes' do + context 'validations' do + it { is_expected.to validate_presence_of(:diff_max_patch_bytes) } + + it do + is_expected.to validate_numericality_of(:diff_max_patch_bytes) + .only_integer + .is_greater_than_or_equal_to(Gitlab::Git::Diff::DEFAULT_MAX_PATCH_BYTES) + .is_less_than_or_equal_to(Gitlab::Git::Diff::MAX_PATCH_BYTES_UPPER_BOUND) + end + end + end + end end diff --git a/spec/models/blob_viewer/package_json_spec.rb b/spec/models/blob_viewer/package_json_spec.rb index 5ed2f4400bc..fbaa8d47a71 100644 --- a/spec/models/blob_viewer/package_json_spec.rb +++ b/spec/models/blob_viewer/package_json_spec.rb @@ -40,13 +40,14 @@ describe BlobViewer::PackageJson do end context 'when package.json has "private": true' do + let(:homepage) { 'http://example.com' } let(:data) do <<-SPEC.strip_heredoc { "name": "module-name", "version": "10.3.1", "private": true, - "homepage": "myawesomepackage.com" + "homepage": #{homepage.to_json} } SPEC end @@ -54,10 +55,22 @@ describe BlobViewer::PackageJson do subject { described_class.new(blob) } describe '#package_url' do - it 'returns homepage if any' do - expect(subject).to receive(:prepare!) + context 'when the homepage has a valid URL' do + it 'returns homepage URL' do + expect(subject).to receive(:prepare!) + + expect(subject.package_url).to eq(homepage) + end + end + + context 'when the homepage has an invalid URL' do + let(:homepage) { 'javascript:alert()' } + + it 'returns nil' do + expect(subject).to receive(:prepare!) - expect(subject.package_url).to eq('myawesomepackage.com') + expect(subject.package_url).to be_nil + end end end diff --git a/spec/models/ci/build_spec.rb b/spec/models/ci/build_spec.rb index e82d93d5935..61fd079def2 100644 --- a/spec/models/ci/build_spec.rb +++ b/spec/models/ci/build_spec.rb @@ -1278,6 +1278,19 @@ describe Ci::Build do end end + describe '#artifacts_file_for_type' do + let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :artifacts) } + let(:file_type) { :archive } + + subject { build.artifacts_file_for_type(file_type) } + + it 'queries artifacts for type' do + expect(build).to receive_message_chain(:job_artifacts, :find_by).with(file_type: Ci::JobArtifact.file_types[file_type]) + + subject + end + end + describe '#merge_request' do def create_mr(build, pipeline, factory: :merge_request, created_at: Time.now) create(factory, source_project: pipeline.project, diff --git a/spec/models/ci/job_artifact_spec.rb b/spec/models/ci/job_artifact_spec.rb index 2f449d617be..85fad77a242 100644 --- a/spec/models/ci/job_artifact_spec.rb +++ b/spec/models/ci/job_artifact_spec.rb @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ describe Ci::JobArtifact do describe '.erasable' do subject { described_class.erasable } - context 'when there is am erasable artifact' do + context 'when there is an erasable artifact' do let!(:artifact) { create(:ci_job_artifact, :junit) } it { is_expected.to eq([artifact]) } diff --git a/spec/models/ci/pipeline_spec.rb b/spec/models/ci/pipeline_spec.rb index 1060417b03b..b56c7f26864 100644 --- a/spec/models/ci/pipeline_spec.rb +++ b/spec/models/ci/pipeline_spec.rb @@ -2019,4 +2019,34 @@ describe Ci::Pipeline, :mailer do end end end + + describe '#default_branch?' do + let(:default_branch) { 'master'} + + subject { pipeline.default_branch? } + + before do + allow(project).to receive(:default_branch).and_return(default_branch) + end + + context 'when pipeline ref is the default branch of the project' do + let(:pipeline) do + build(:ci_empty_pipeline, status: :created, project: project, ref: default_branch) + end + + it "returns true" do + expect(subject).to be_truthy + end + end + + context 'when pipeline ref is not the default branch of the project' do + let(:pipeline) do + build(:ci_empty_pipeline, status: :created, project: project, ref: 'another_branch') + end + + it "returns false" do + expect(subject).to be_falsey + end + end + end end diff --git a/spec/models/ci/pipeline_variable_spec.rb b/spec/models/ci/pipeline_variable_spec.rb index 889c243c8d8..03d09cb31d6 100644 --- a/spec/models/ci/pipeline_variable_spec.rb +++ b/spec/models/ci/pipeline_variable_spec.rb @@ -5,4 +5,13 @@ describe Ci::PipelineVariable do it { is_expected.to include_module(HasVariable) } it { is_expected.to validate_uniqueness_of(:key).scoped_to(:pipeline_id) } + + describe '#hook_attrs' do + let(:variable) { create(:ci_pipeline_variable, key: 'foo', value: 'bar') } + + subject { variable.hook_attrs } + + it { is_expected.to be_a(Hash) } + it { is_expected.to eq({ key: 'foo', value: 'bar' }) } + end end diff --git a/spec/models/concerns/cache_markdown_field_spec.rb b/spec/models/concerns/cache_markdown_field_spec.rb index da26d802688..f8d50e89d40 100644 --- a/spec/models/concerns/cache_markdown_field_spec.rb +++ b/spec/models/concerns/cache_markdown_field_spec.rb @@ -331,11 +331,12 @@ describe CacheMarkdownField do end context 'with a project' do - let(:thing) { thing_subclass(:project).new(foo: markdown, foo_html: html, project: :project_value) } + let(:project) { create(:project, group: create(:group)) } + let(:thing) { thing_subclass(:project).new(foo: markdown, foo_html: html, project: project) } it 'sets the project in the context' do is_expected.to have_key(:project) - expect(context[:project]).to eq(:project_value) + expect(context[:project]).to eq(project) end it 'invalidates the cache when project changes' do diff --git a/spec/models/event_spec.rb b/spec/models/event_spec.rb index c1eac4fa489..81748681528 100644 --- a/spec/models/event_spec.rb +++ b/spec/models/event_spec.rb @@ -148,9 +148,14 @@ describe Event do let(:admin) { create(:admin) } let(:issue) { create(:issue, project: project, author: author, assignees: [assignee]) } let(:confidential_issue) { create(:issue, :confidential, project: project, author: author, assignees: [assignee]) } + let(:project_snippet) { create(:project_snippet, :public, project: project, author: author) } + let(:personal_snippet) { create(:personal_snippet, :public, author: author) } let(:note_on_commit) { create(:note_on_commit, project: project) } let(:note_on_issue) { create(:note_on_issue, noteable: issue, project: project) } let(:note_on_confidential_issue) { create(:note_on_issue, noteable: confidential_issue, project: project) } + let(:note_on_project_snippet) { create(:note_on_project_snippet, author: author, noteable: project_snippet, project: project) } + let(:note_on_personal_snippet) { create(:note_on_personal_snippet, author: author, noteable: personal_snippet, project: nil) } + let(:milestone_on_project) { create(:milestone, project: project) } let(:event) { described_class.new(project: project, target: target, author_id: author.id) } before do @@ -268,6 +273,125 @@ describe Event do end end end + + context 'milestone event' do + let(:target) { milestone_on_project } + + it do + expect(event.visible_to_user?(nil)).to be_truthy + expect(event.visible_to_user?(non_member)).to be_truthy + expect(event.visible_to_user?(member)).to be_truthy + expect(event.visible_to_user?(guest)).to be_truthy + expect(event.visible_to_user?(admin)).to be_truthy + end + + context 'on public project with private issue tracker and merge requests' do + let(:project) { create(:project, :public, :issues_private, :merge_requests_private) } + + it do + expect(event.visible_to_user?(nil)).to be_falsy + expect(event.visible_to_user?(non_member)).to be_falsy + expect(event.visible_to_user?(member)).to be_truthy + expect(event.visible_to_user?(guest)).to be_truthy + expect(event.visible_to_user?(admin)).to be_truthy + end + end + + context 'on private project' do + let(:project) { create(:project, :private) } + + it do + expect(event.visible_to_user?(nil)).to be_falsy + expect(event.visible_to_user?(non_member)).to be_falsy + expect(event.visible_to_user?(member)).to be_truthy + expect(event.visible_to_user?(guest)).to be_truthy + expect(event.visible_to_user?(admin)).to be_truthy + end + end + end + + context 'project snippet note event' do + let(:target) { note_on_project_snippet } + + it do + expect(event.visible_to_user?(nil)).to be_truthy + expect(event.visible_to_user?(non_member)).to be_truthy + expect(event.visible_to_user?(author)).to be_truthy + expect(event.visible_to_user?(member)).to be_truthy + expect(event.visible_to_user?(guest)).to be_truthy + expect(event.visible_to_user?(admin)).to be_truthy + end + + context 'on public project with private snippets' do + let(:project) { create(:project, :public, :snippets_private) } + + it do + expect(event.visible_to_user?(nil)).to be_falsy + expect(event.visible_to_user?(non_member)).to be_falsy + + # Normally, we'd expect the author of a comment to be able to view it. + # However, this doesn't seem to be the case for comments on snippets. + expect(event.visible_to_user?(author)).to be_falsy + + expect(event.visible_to_user?(member)).to be_truthy + expect(event.visible_to_user?(guest)).to be_truthy + expect(event.visible_to_user?(admin)).to be_truthy + end + end + + context 'on private project' do + let(:project) { create(:project, :private) } + + it do + expect(event.visible_to_user?(nil)).to be_falsy + expect(event.visible_to_user?(non_member)).to be_falsy + + # Normally, we'd expect the author of a comment to be able to view it. + # However, this doesn't seem to be the case for comments on snippets. + expect(event.visible_to_user?(author)).to be_falsy + + expect(event.visible_to_user?(member)).to be_truthy + expect(event.visible_to_user?(guest)).to be_truthy + expect(event.visible_to_user?(admin)).to be_truthy + end + end + end + + context 'personal snippet note event' do + let(:target) { note_on_personal_snippet } + + it do + expect(event.visible_to_user?(nil)).to be_truthy + expect(event.visible_to_user?(non_member)).to be_truthy + expect(event.visible_to_user?(author)).to be_truthy + expect(event.visible_to_user?(admin)).to be_truthy + end + + context 'on internal snippet' do + let(:personal_snippet) { create(:personal_snippet, :internal, author: author) } + + it do + expect(event.visible_to_user?(nil)).to be_falsy + expect(event.visible_to_user?(non_member)).to be_truthy + expect(event.visible_to_user?(author)).to be_truthy + expect(event.visible_to_user?(admin)).to be_truthy + end + end + + context 'on private snippet' do + let(:personal_snippet) { create(:personal_snippet, :private, author: author) } + + it do + expect(event.visible_to_user?(nil)).to be_falsy + expect(event.visible_to_user?(non_member)).to be_falsy + expect(event.visible_to_user?(author)).to be_truthy + + # It is very unexpected that a private personal snippet is not visible + # to an instance administrator. This should be fixed in the future. + expect(event.visible_to_user?(admin)).to be_falsy + end + end + end end describe '.limit_recent' do diff --git a/spec/models/group_spec.rb b/spec/models/group_spec.rb index 0729eb99e78..1bf8f89e126 100644 --- a/spec/models/group_spec.rb +++ b/spec/models/group_spec.rb @@ -169,22 +169,42 @@ describe Group do end end - describe '.visible_to_user' do - let!(:group) { create(:group) } - let!(:user) { create(:user) } + describe '.public_or_visible_to_user' do + let!(:private_group) { create(:group, :private) } + let!(:internal_group) { create(:group, :internal) } - subject { described_class.visible_to_user(user) } + subject { described_class.public_or_visible_to_user(user) } - describe 'when the user has access to a group' do - before do - group.add_user(user, Gitlab::Access::MAINTAINER) - end + context 'when user is nil' do + let!(:user) { nil } - it { is_expected.to eq([group]) } + it { is_expected.to match_array([group]) } end - describe 'when the user does not have access to any groups' do - it { is_expected.to eq([]) } + context 'when user' do + let!(:user) { create(:user) } + + context 'when user does not have access to any private group' do + it { is_expected.to match_array([internal_group, group]) } + end + + context 'when user is a member of private group' do + before do + private_group.add_user(user, Gitlab::Access::DEVELOPER) + end + + it { is_expected.to match_array([private_group, internal_group, group]) } + end + + context 'when user is a member of private subgroup', :postgresql do + let!(:private_subgroup) { create(:group, :private, parent: private_group) } + + before do + private_subgroup.add_user(user, Gitlab::Access::DEVELOPER) + end + + it { is_expected.to match_array([private_subgroup, internal_group, group]) } + end end end diff --git a/spec/models/hooks/web_hook_spec.rb b/spec/models/hooks/web_hook_spec.rb index a4181631f01..a308ac6e33a 100644 --- a/spec/models/hooks/web_hook_spec.rb +++ b/spec/models/hooks/web_hook_spec.rb @@ -57,6 +57,12 @@ describe WebHook do end end + describe 'encrypted attributes' do + subject { described_class.encrypted_attributes.keys } + + it { is_expected.to contain_exactly(:token, :url) } + end + describe 'execute' do let(:data) { { key: 'value' } } let(:hook_name) { 'project hook' } diff --git a/spec/models/instance_configuration_spec.rb b/spec/models/instance_configuration_spec.rb index 34db94920f3..cb3d6c7cda2 100644 --- a/spec/models/instance_configuration_spec.rb +++ b/spec/models/instance_configuration_spec.rb @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ require 'spec_helper' -RSpec.describe InstanceConfiguration do +describe InstanceConfiguration do context 'without cache' do describe '#settings' do describe '#ssh_algorithms_hashes' do - let(:md5) { '54:e0:f8:70:d6:4f:4c:b1:b3:02:44:77:cf:cd:0d:fc' } - let(:sha256) { '9327f0d15a48c4d9f6a3aee65a1825baf9a3412001c98169c5fd022ac27762fc' } + let(:md5) { '5a:65:6c:4d:d4:4c:6d:e6:59:25:b8:cf:ba:34:e7:64' } + let(:sha256) { 'SHA256:2KJDT7xf2i68mBgJ3TVsjISntg4droLbXYLfQj0VvSY' } it 'does not return anything if file does not exist' do stub_pub_file(exist: false) diff --git a/spec/models/label_spec.rb b/spec/models/label_spec.rb index 99670af786a..3fc6c06b7fa 100644 --- a/spec/models/label_spec.rb +++ b/spec/models/label_spec.rb @@ -155,4 +155,40 @@ describe Label do expect(described_class.search('feature')).to be_empty end end + + describe '.subscribed_by' do + let!(:user) { create(:user) } + let!(:label) { create(:label) } + let!(:label2) { create(:label) } + + before do + label.subscribe(user) + end + + it 'returns subscribed labels' do + expect(described_class.subscribed_by(user.id)).to eq([label]) + end + + it 'returns nothing' do + expect(described_class.subscribed_by(0)).to be_empty + end + end + + describe '.optionally_subscribed_by' do + let!(:user) { create(:user) } + let!(:label) { create(:label) } + let!(:label2) { create(:label) } + + before do + label.subscribe(user) + end + + it 'returns subscribed labels' do + expect(described_class.optionally_subscribed_by(user.id)).to eq([label]) + end + + it 'returns all labels if user_id is nil' do + expect(described_class.optionally_subscribed_by(nil)).to match_array([label, label2]) + end + end end diff --git a/spec/models/merge_request_spec.rb b/spec/models/merge_request_spec.rb index 48f4e53b93e..666d7e69f89 100644 --- a/spec/models/merge_request_spec.rb +++ b/spec/models/merge_request_spec.rb @@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ describe MergeRequest do end describe "#wipless_title" do - ['WIP ', 'WIP:', 'WIP: ', '[WIP]', '[WIP] ', ' [WIP] WIP [WIP] WIP: WIP '].each do |wip_prefix| + ['WIP ', 'WIP:', 'WIP: ', '[WIP]', '[WIP] ', '[WIP] WIP [WIP] WIP: WIP '].each do |wip_prefix| it "removes the '#{wip_prefix}' prefix" do wipless_title = subject.title subject.title = "#{wip_prefix}#{subject.title}" diff --git a/spec/models/namespace_spec.rb b/spec/models/namespace_spec.rb index 3649990670b..8913644a3ce 100644 --- a/spec/models/namespace_spec.rb +++ b/spec/models/namespace_spec.rb @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ require 'spec_helper' describe Namespace do include ProjectForksHelper + include GitHelpers let!(:namespace) { create(:namespace) } let(:gitlab_shell) { Gitlab::Shell.new } @@ -82,6 +83,27 @@ describe Namespace do it { expect(namespace.human_name).to eq(namespace.owner_name) } end + describe '#first_project_with_container_registry_tags' do + let(:container_repository) { create(:container_repository) } + let!(:project) { create(:project, namespace: namespace, container_repositories: [container_repository]) } + + before do + stub_container_registry_config(enabled: true) + end + + it 'returns the project' do + stub_container_registry_tags(repository: :any, tags: ['tag']) + + expect(namespace.first_project_with_container_registry_tags).to eq(project) + end + + it 'returns no project' do + stub_container_registry_tags(repository: :any, tags: nil) + + expect(namespace.first_project_with_container_registry_tags).to be_nil + end + end + describe '.search' do let(:namespace) { create(:namespace) } @@ -184,7 +206,8 @@ describe Namespace do end it 'raises an error about not movable project' do - expect { namespace.move_dir }.to raise_error(/Namespace cannot be moved/) + expect { namespace.move_dir }.to raise_error(Gitlab::UpdatePathError, + /Namespace .* cannot be moved/) end end end @@ -339,9 +362,7 @@ describe Namespace do end def project_rugged(project) - Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do - project.repository.rugged - end + rugged_repo(project.repository) end end diff --git a/spec/models/project_spec.rb b/spec/models/project_spec.rb index afc9ea1917e..8b71919544e 100644 --- a/spec/models/project_spec.rb +++ b/spec/models/project_spec.rb @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ require 'spec_helper' describe Project do include ProjectForksHelper + include GitHelpers describe 'associations' do it { is_expected.to belong_to(:group) } @@ -3995,9 +3996,50 @@ describe Project do end end - def rugged_config - Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do - project.repository.rugged.config + context '#members_among' do + let(:users) { create_list(:user, 3) } + set(:group) { create(:group) } + set(:project) { create(:project, namespace: group) } + + before do + project.add_guest(users.first) + project.group.add_maintainer(users.last) + end + + context 'when users is an Array' do + it 'returns project members among the users' do + expect(project.members_among(users)).to eq([users.first, users.last]) + end + + it 'maintains input order' do + expect(project.members_among(users.reverse)).to eq([users.last, users.first]) + end + + it 'returns empty array if users is empty' do + result = project.members_among([]) + + expect(result).to be_empty + end end + + context 'when users is a relation' do + it 'returns project members among the users' do + result = project.members_among(User.where(id: users.map(&:id))) + + expect(result).to be_a(ActiveRecord::Relation) + expect(result).to eq([users.first, users.last]) + end + + it 'returns empty relation if users is empty' do + result = project.members_among(User.none) + + expect(result).to be_a(ActiveRecord::Relation) + expect(result).to be_empty + end + end + end + + def rugged_config + rugged_repo(project.repository).config end end diff --git a/spec/models/remote_mirror_spec.rb b/spec/models/remote_mirror_spec.rb index 269d5deca20..3d316fb3c5b 100644 --- a/spec/models/remote_mirror_spec.rb +++ b/spec/models/remote_mirror_spec.rb @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ require 'rails_helper' describe RemoteMirror do + include GitHelpers + describe 'URL validation' do context 'with a valid URL' do it 'should be valid' do @@ -74,9 +76,7 @@ describe RemoteMirror do mirror.update_attribute(:url, 'http://foo:baz@test.com') - config = Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do - repo.raw_repository.rugged.config - end + config = rugged_repo(repo).config expect(config["remote.#{mirror.remote_name}.url"]).to eq('http://foo:baz@test.com') end diff --git a/spec/models/repository_spec.rb b/spec/models/repository_spec.rb index 7e1b7c35517..77e549d9528 100644 --- a/spec/models/repository_spec.rb +++ b/spec/models/repository_spec.rb @@ -2,6 +2,8 @@ require 'spec_helper' describe Repository do include RepoHelpers + include GitHelpers + TestBlob = Struct.new(:path) let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) } @@ -137,9 +139,7 @@ describe Repository do options = { message: 'test tag message\n', tagger: { name: 'John Smith', email: 'john@gmail.com' } } - Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do - repository.rugged.tags.create(annotated_tag_name, 'a48e4fc218069f68ef2e769dd8dfea3991362175', options) - end + rugged_repo(repository).tags.create(annotated_tag_name, 'a48e4fc218069f68ef2e769dd8dfea3991362175', options) double_first = double(committed_date: Time.now - 1.second) double_last = double(committed_date: Time.now) @@ -151,9 +151,7 @@ describe Repository do it { is_expected.to eq(['v1.1.0', 'v1.0.0', annotated_tag_name]) } after do - Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do - repository.rugged.tags.delete(annotated_tag_name) - end + rugged_repo(repository).tags.delete(annotated_tag_name) end end end @@ -188,6 +186,57 @@ describe Repository do end end + describe '#list_last_commits_for_tree' do + let(:path_to_commit) do + { + "encoding" => "913c66a37b4a45b9769037c55c2d238bd0942d2e", + "files" => "570e7b2abdd848b95f2f578043fc23bd6f6fd24d", + ".gitignore" => "c1acaa58bbcbc3eafe538cb8274ba387047b69f8", + ".gitmodules" => "6f6d7e7ed97bb5f0054f2b1df789b39ca89b6ff9", + "CHANGELOG" => "913c66a37b4a45b9769037c55c2d238bd0942d2e", + "CONTRIBUTING.md" => "6d394385cf567f80a8fd85055db1ab4c5295806f", + "Gemfile.zip" => "ae73cb07c9eeaf35924a10f713b364d32b2dd34f", + "LICENSE" => "1a0b36b3cdad1d2ee32457c102a8c0b7056fa863", + "MAINTENANCE.md" => "913c66a37b4a45b9769037c55c2d238bd0942d2e", + "PROCESS.md" => "913c66a37b4a45b9769037c55c2d238bd0942d2e", + "README.md" => "1a0b36b3cdad1d2ee32457c102a8c0b7056fa863", + "VERSION" => "913c66a37b4a45b9769037c55c2d238bd0942d2e", + "gitlab-shell" => "6f6d7e7ed97bb5f0054f2b1df789b39ca89b6ff9", + "six" => "cfe32cf61b73a0d5e9f13e774abde7ff789b1660" + } + end + + subject { repository.list_last_commits_for_tree(sample_commit.id, '.').id } + + it 'returns the last commits for every entry in the current path' do + result = repository.list_last_commits_for_tree(sample_commit.id, '.') + + result.each do |key, value| + result[key] = value.id + end + + expect(result).to include(path_to_commit) + end + + it 'returns the last commits for every entry in the current path starting from the offset' do + result = repository.list_last_commits_for_tree(sample_commit.id, '.', offset: path_to_commit.size - 1) + + expect(result.size).to eq(1) + end + + it 'returns a limited number of last commits for every entry in the current path starting from the offset' do + result = repository.list_last_commits_for_tree(sample_commit.id, '.', limit: 1) + + expect(result.size).to eq(1) + end + + it 'returns an empty hash when offset is out of bounds' do + result = repository.list_last_commits_for_tree(sample_commit.id, '.', offset: path_to_commit.size) + + expect(result.size).to eq(0) + end + end + describe '#last_commit_for_path' do shared_examples 'getting last commit for path' do subject { repository.last_commit_for_path(sample_commit.id, '.gitignore').id } @@ -1627,10 +1676,7 @@ describe Repository do it 'returns the number of branches' do expect(repository.branch_count).to be_an(Integer) - # NOTE: Until rugged goes away, make sure rugged and gitaly are in sync - rugged_count = Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do - repository.raw_repository.rugged.branches.count - end + rugged_count = rugged_repo(repository).branches.count expect(repository.branch_count).to eq(rugged_count) end @@ -1640,10 +1686,7 @@ describe Repository do it 'returns the number of tags' do expect(repository.tag_count).to be_an(Integer) - # NOTE: Until rugged goes away, make sure rugged and gitaly are in sync - rugged_count = Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do - repository.raw_repository.rugged.tags.count - end + rugged_count = rugged_repo(repository).tags.count expect(repository.tag_count).to eq(rugged_count) end @@ -2133,9 +2176,7 @@ describe Repository do end def create_remote_branch(remote_name, branch_name, target) - rugged = Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do - repository.rugged - end + rugged = rugged_repo(repository) rugged.references.create("refs/remotes/#{remote_name}/#{branch_name}", target.id) end diff --git a/spec/models/wiki_page_spec.rb b/spec/models/wiki_page_spec.rb index 63850939be1..b4732ec0cd5 100644 --- a/spec/models/wiki_page_spec.rb +++ b/spec/models/wiki_page_spec.rb @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ describe WikiPage do end describe "#initialize" do - context "when initialized with an existing gollum page" do + context "when initialized with an existing page" do before do create_page("test page", "test content") @page = wiki.wiki.page(title: "test page") diff --git a/spec/policies/issue_policy_spec.rb b/spec/policies/issue_policy_spec.rb index 93e85b3a6fa..008d118b557 100644 --- a/spec/policies/issue_policy_spec.rb +++ b/spec/policies/issue_policy_spec.rb @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ describe IssuePolicy do let(:project) { create(:project, :public) } let(:issue) { create(:issue, project: project, assignees: [assignee], author: author) } let(:issue_no_assignee) { create(:issue, project: project) } - let(:issue_locked) { create(:issue, project: project, discussion_locked: true, author: author, assignees: [assignee]) } + let(:issue_locked) { create(:issue, :locked, project: project, author: author, assignees: [assignee]) } before do project.add_guest(guest) diff --git a/spec/requests/api/commits_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/commits_spec.rb index f3fb88474a4..98399471f9a 100644 --- a/spec/requests/api/commits_spec.rb +++ b/spec/requests/api/commits_spec.rb @@ -278,6 +278,12 @@ describe API::Commits do } end + it 'does not increment the usage counters using access token authentication' do + expect(::Gitlab::WebIdeCommitsCounter).not_to receive(:increment) + + post api(url, user), valid_c_params + end + it 'a new file in project repo' do post api(url, user), valid_c_params @@ -566,6 +572,20 @@ describe API::Commits do expect(json_response['title']).to eq(message) end + it 'includes the commit stats' do + post api(url, user), valid_mo_params + + expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(201) + expect(json_response).to include 'stats' + end + + it "doesn't include the commit stats when stats is false" do + post api(url, user), valid_mo_params.merge(stats: false) + + expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(201) + expect(json_response).not_to include 'stats' + end + it 'return a 400 bad request if there are any issues' do post api(url, user), invalid_mo_params diff --git a/spec/requests/api/groups_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/groups_spec.rb index 3a8948f8477..3802b5c6848 100644 --- a/spec/requests/api/groups_spec.rb +++ b/spec/requests/api/groups_spec.rb @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ describe API::Groups do expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200) expect(response).to include_pagination_headers expect(json_response).to be_an Array - expect(response_groups).to eq(Group.visible_to_user(user1).order(:name).pluck(:name)) + expect(response_groups).to eq(groups_visible_to_user(user1).order(:name).pluck(:name)) end it "sorts in descending order when passed" do @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ describe API::Groups do expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200) expect(response).to include_pagination_headers expect(json_response).to be_an Array - expect(response_groups).to eq(Group.visible_to_user(user1).order(name: :desc).pluck(:name)) + expect(response_groups).to eq(groups_visible_to_user(user1).order(name: :desc).pluck(:name)) end it "sorts by path in order_by param" do @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ describe API::Groups do expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200) expect(response).to include_pagination_headers expect(json_response).to be_an Array - expect(response_groups).to eq(Group.visible_to_user(user1).order(:path).pluck(:name)) + expect(response_groups).to eq(groups_visible_to_user(user1).order(:path).pluck(:name)) end it "sorts by id in the order_by param" do @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ describe API::Groups do expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200) expect(response).to include_pagination_headers expect(json_response).to be_an Array - expect(response_groups).to eq(Group.visible_to_user(user1).order(:id).pluck(:name)) + expect(response_groups).to eq(groups_visible_to_user(user1).order(:id).pluck(:name)) end it "sorts also by descending id with pagination fix" do @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ describe API::Groups do expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200) expect(response).to include_pagination_headers expect(json_response).to be_an Array - expect(response_groups).to eq(Group.visible_to_user(user1).order(id: :desc).pluck(:name)) + expect(response_groups).to eq(groups_visible_to_user(user1).order(id: :desc).pluck(:name)) end it "sorts identical keys by id for good pagination" do @@ -211,6 +211,10 @@ describe API::Groups do expect(json_response).to be_an Array expect(response_groups_ids).to eq(Group.select { |group| group['name'] == 'same-name' }.map { |group| group['id'] }.sort) end + + def groups_visible_to_user(user) + Group.where(id: user.authorized_groups.select(:id).reorder(nil)) + end end context 'when using owned in the request' do diff --git a/spec/requests/api/issues_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/issues_spec.rb index f64815feffa..1e2e13a723c 100644 --- a/spec/requests/api/issues_spec.rb +++ b/spec/requests/api/issues_spec.rb @@ -168,6 +168,15 @@ describe API::Issues do expect(first_issue['id']).to eq(issue2.id) end + it 'returns issues with no assignee' do + issue2 = create(:issue, author: user2, project: project) + + get api('/issues', user), assignee_id: 0, scope: 'all' + + expect_paginated_array_response(size: 1) + expect(first_issue['id']).to eq(issue2.id) + end + it 'returns issues reacted by the authenticated user by the given emoji' do issue2 = create(:issue, project: project, author: user, assignees: [user]) award_emoji = create(:award_emoji, awardable: issue2, user: user2, name: 'star') diff --git a/spec/requests/api/merge_requests_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/merge_requests_spec.rb index e987eee6e91..07d19e3ad29 100644 --- a/spec/requests/api/merge_requests_spec.rb +++ b/spec/requests/api/merge_requests_spec.rb @@ -81,6 +81,35 @@ describe API::MergeRequests do let(:user2) { create(:user) } it 'returns an array of all merge requests except unauthorized ones' do + get api('/merge_requests', user), scope: :all + + expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200) + expect(response).to include_pagination_headers + expect(json_response).to be_an Array + expect(json_response.map { |mr| mr['id'] }) + .to contain_exactly(merge_request.id, merge_request_closed.id, merge_request_merged.id, merge_request_locked.id, merge_request2.id) + end + + it "returns an array of no merge_requests when wip=yes" do + get api("/merge_requests", user), wip: 'yes' + + expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200) + expect(response).to include_pagination_headers + expect(json_response).to be_an Array + expect(json_response.length).to eq(0) + end + + it "returns an array of no merge_requests when wip=no" do + get api("/merge_requests", user), wip: 'no' + + expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200) + expect(response).to include_pagination_headers + expect(json_response).to be_an Array + expect(json_response.map { |mr| mr['id'] }) + .to contain_exactly(merge_request.id, merge_request_closed.id, merge_request_merged.id, merge_request_locked.id, merge_request2.id) + end + + it 'does not return unauthorized merge requests' do private_project = create(:project, :private) merge_request3 = create(:merge_request, :simple, source_project: private_project, target_project: private_project, source_branch: 'other-branch') @@ -244,6 +273,15 @@ describe API::MergeRequests do expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(404) end + it "returns an array of no merge_requests when wip=yes" do + get api("/projects/#{project.id}/merge_requests", user), wip: 'yes' + + expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200) + expect(response).to include_pagination_headers + expect(json_response).to be_an Array + expect(json_response.length).to eq(0) + end + it 'returns merge_request by "iids" array' do get api(endpoint_path, user), iids: [merge_request.iid, merge_request_closed.iid] diff --git a/spec/requests/api/redacted_events_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/redacted_events_spec.rb new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..086dd3df9ba --- /dev/null +++ b/spec/requests/api/redacted_events_spec.rb @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ +require 'spec_helper' + +describe 'Redacted events in API::Events' do + shared_examples 'private events are redacted' do + it 'redacts events the user does not have access to' do + expect_any_instance_of(Event).to receive(:visible_to_user?).and_call_original + + get api(path), user + + expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200) + expect(json_response).to contain_exactly( + 'project_id' => nil, + 'action_name' => nil, + 'target_id' => nil, + 'target_iid' => nil, + 'target_type' => nil, + 'author_id' => nil, + 'target_title' => 'Confidential event', + 'created_at' => nil, + 'author_username' => nil + ) + end + end + + describe '/users/:id/events' do + let(:project) { create(:project, :public) } + let(:path) { "/users/#{project.owner.id}/events" } + let(:issue) { create(:issue, :confidential, project: project) } + + before do + EventCreateService.new.open_issue(issue, issue.author) + end + + context 'unauthenticated user views another user with private events' do + let(:user) { nil } + + include_examples 'private events are redacted' + end + + context 'authenticated user without access views another user with private events' do + let(:user) { create(:user) } + + include_examples 'private events are redacted' + end + end + + describe '/projects/:id/events' do + let(:project) { create(:project, :public) } + let(:path) { "/projects/#{project.id}/events" } + let(:issue) { create(:issue, :confidential, project: project) } + + before do + EventCreateService.new.open_issue(issue, issue.author) + end + + context 'unauthenticated user views public project' do + let(:user) { nil } + + include_examples 'private events are redacted' + end + + context 'authenticated user without access views public project' do + let(:user) { create(:user) } + + include_examples 'private events are redacted' + end + end +end diff --git a/spec/requests/api/settings_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/settings_spec.rb index 3e0f47b84a1..e379bd9785a 100644 --- a/spec/requests/api/settings_spec.rb +++ b/spec/requests/api/settings_spec.rb @@ -66,7 +66,8 @@ describe API::Settings, 'Settings' do enforce_terms: true, terms: 'Hello world!', performance_bar_allowed_group_path: group.full_path, - instance_statistics_visibility_private: true + instance_statistics_visibility_private: true, + diff_max_patch_bytes: 150_000 expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200) expect(json_response['default_projects_limit']).to eq(3) @@ -92,6 +93,7 @@ describe API::Settings, 'Settings' do expect(json_response['terms']).to eq('Hello world!') expect(json_response['performance_bar_allowed_group_id']).to eq(group.id) expect(json_response['instance_statistics_visibility_private']).to be(true) + expect(json_response['diff_max_patch_bytes']).to eq(150_000) end end diff --git a/spec/routing/project_routing_spec.rb b/spec/routing/project_routing_spec.rb index 5abc6d81958..56df8dddbc1 100644 --- a/spec/routing/project_routing_spec.rb +++ b/spec/routing/project_routing_spec.rb @@ -258,10 +258,10 @@ describe 'project routing' do end it 'to #logs_tree' do - expect(get('/gitlab/gitlabhq/refs/stable/logs_tree')).to route_to('projects/refs#logs_tree', namespace_id: 'gitlab', project_id: 'gitlabhq', id: 'stable') - expect(get('/gitlab/gitlabhq/refs/feature%2345/logs_tree')).to route_to('projects/refs#logs_tree', namespace_id: 'gitlab', project_id: 'gitlabhq', id: 'feature#45') - expect(get('/gitlab/gitlabhq/refs/feature%2B45/logs_tree')).to route_to('projects/refs#logs_tree', namespace_id: 'gitlab', project_id: 'gitlabhq', id: 'feature+45') - expect(get('/gitlab/gitlabhq/refs/feature@45/logs_tree')).to route_to('projects/refs#logs_tree', namespace_id: 'gitlab', project_id: 'gitlabhq', id: 'feature@45') + expect(get('/gitlab/gitlabhq/refs/stable/logs_tree')).to route_to('projects/refs#logs_tree', namespace_id: 'gitlab', project_id: 'gitlabhq', id: 'stable') + expect(get('/gitlab/gitlabhq/refs/feature%2345/logs_tree')).to route_to('projects/refs#logs_tree', namespace_id: 'gitlab', project_id: 'gitlabhq', id: 'feature#45') + expect(get('/gitlab/gitlabhq/refs/feature%2B45/logs_tree')).to route_to('projects/refs#logs_tree', namespace_id: 'gitlab', project_id: 'gitlabhq', id: 'feature+45') + expect(get('/gitlab/gitlabhq/refs/feature@45/logs_tree')).to route_to('projects/refs#logs_tree', namespace_id: 'gitlab', project_id: 'gitlabhq', id: 'feature@45') expect(get('/gitlab/gitlabhq/refs/stable/logs_tree/foo/bar/baz')).to route_to('projects/refs#logs_tree', namespace_id: 'gitlab', project_id: 'gitlabhq', id: 'stable', path: 'foo/bar/baz') expect(get('/gitlab/gitlabhq/refs/feature%2345/logs_tree/foo/bar/baz')).to route_to('projects/refs#logs_tree', namespace_id: 'gitlab', project_id: 'gitlabhq', id: 'feature#45', path: 'foo/bar/baz') expect(get('/gitlab/gitlabhq/refs/feature%2B45/logs_tree/foo/bar/baz')).to route_to('projects/refs#logs_tree', namespace_id: 'gitlab', project_id: 'gitlabhq', id: 'feature+45', path: 'foo/bar/baz') diff --git a/spec/rubocop/cop/group_public_or_visible_to_user_spec.rb b/spec/rubocop/cop/group_public_or_visible_to_user_spec.rb new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7b5235a3da7 --- /dev/null +++ b/spec/rubocop/cop/group_public_or_visible_to_user_spec.rb @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +require 'spec_helper' +require 'rubocop' +require 'rubocop/rspec/support' +require_relative '../../../rubocop/cop/group_public_or_visible_to_user' + +describe RuboCop::Cop::GroupPublicOrVisibleToUser do + include CopHelper + + subject(:cop) { described_class.new } + + it 'flags the use of Group.public_or_visible_to_user with a constant receiver' do + inspect_source('Group.public_or_visible_to_user') + + expect(cop.offenses.size).to eq(1) + end + + it 'does not flat the use of public_or_visible_to_user with a constant that is not Group' do + inspect_source('Project.public_or_visible_to_user') + + expect(cop.offenses.size).to eq(0) + end + + it 'does not flag the use of Group.public_or_visible_to_user with a send receiver' do + inspect_source('foo.public_or_visible_to_user') + + expect(cop.offenses.size).to eq(0) + end +end diff --git a/spec/serializers/commit_entity_spec.rb b/spec/serializers/commit_entity_spec.rb index 35215e06f5f..b9995818e98 100644 --- a/spec/serializers/commit_entity_spec.rb +++ b/spec/serializers/commit_entity_spec.rb @@ -1,10 +1,11 @@ require 'spec_helper' describe CommitEntity do + SIGNATURE_HTML = 'TEST'.freeze + let(:entity) do described_class.new(commit, request: request) end - let(:request) { double('request') } let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) } let(:commit) { project.commit } @@ -12,7 +13,11 @@ describe CommitEntity do subject { entity.as_json } before do + render = double('render') + allow(render).to receive(:call).and_return(SIGNATURE_HTML) + allow(request).to receive(:project).and_return(project) + allow(request).to receive(:render).and_return(render) end context 'when commit author is a user' do @@ -61,7 +66,7 @@ describe CommitEntity do context 'when type is "full"' do let(:entity) do - described_class.new(commit, request: request, type: :full) + described_class.new(commit, request: request, type: :full, pipeline_ref: project.default_branch, pipeline_project: project) end it 'exposes extra properties' do @@ -70,6 +75,25 @@ describe CommitEntity do expect(subject.fetch(:description_html)).not_to be_nil expect(subject.fetch(:title_html)).not_to be_nil end + + context 'when commit has signature' do + let(:commit) { project.commit(TestEnv::BRANCH_SHA['signed-commits']) } + + it 'exposes "signature_html"' do + expect(request.render).to receive(:call) + expect(subject.fetch(:signature_html)).to be SIGNATURE_HTML + end + end + + context 'when commit has pipeline' do + before do + create(:ci_pipeline, project: project, sha: commit.id) + end + + it 'exposes "pipeline_status_path"' do + expect(subject.fetch(:pipeline_status_path)).not_to be_nil + end + end end context 'when commit_url_params is set' do diff --git a/spec/serializers/diff_line_entity_spec.rb b/spec/serializers/diff_line_entity_spec.rb new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2549f64bcd3 --- /dev/null +++ b/spec/serializers/diff_line_entity_spec.rb @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +# frozen_string_literal: true + +require 'spec_helper' + +describe DiffLineEntity do + include RepoHelpers + + let(:code) { 'hello world' } + let(:line) { Gitlab::Diff::Line.new(code, 'new', 1, nil, 1) } + let(:entity) { described_class.new(line, request: {}) } + + subject { entity.as_json } + + it 'exposes correct attributes' do + expect(subject).to include( + :line_code, :type, :old_line, :new_line, :text, :meta_data, :rich_text + ) + end + + describe '#rich_text' do + let(:code) { '<h2 onmouseover="alert(2)">Test</h2>' } + let(:rich_text_value) { nil } + + before do + line.instance_variable_set(:@rich_text, rich_text_value) + end + + shared_examples 'escapes html tags' do + it do + expect(subject[:rich_text]).to eq html_escape(code) + expect(subject[:rich_text]).to be_html_safe + end + end + + context 'when rich_line is present' do + let(:rich_text_value) { code } + + it_behaves_like 'escapes html tags' + end + + context 'when rich_line is not present' do + it_behaves_like 'escapes html tags' + end + end +end diff --git a/spec/services/ci/retry_build_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/ci/retry_build_service_spec.rb index 951c0b16a68..750ba1b821b 100644 --- a/spec/services/ci/retry_build_service_spec.rb +++ b/spec/services/ci/retry_build_service_spec.rb @@ -26,7 +26,8 @@ describe Ci::RetryBuildService do erased_at auto_canceled_by job_artifacts job_artifacts_archive job_artifacts_metadata job_artifacts_trace job_artifacts_junit job_artifacts_sast job_artifacts_dependency_scanning - job_artifacts_container_scanning job_artifacts_dast].freeze + job_artifacts_container_scanning job_artifacts_dast + job_artifacts_codequality].freeze IGNORE_ACCESSORS = %i[type lock_version target_url base_tags trace_sections diff --git a/spec/services/clusters/applications/check_installation_progress_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/clusters/applications/check_installation_progress_service_spec.rb index 986f11410fd..1a565bb734d 100644 --- a/spec/services/clusters/applications/check_installation_progress_service_spec.rb +++ b/spec/services/clusters/applications/check_installation_progress_service_spec.rb @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ describe Clusters::Applications::CheckInstallationProgressService do service.execute expect(application).to be_errored - expect(application.status_reason).to eq(errors) + expect(application.status_reason).to eq("Installation failed") end end diff --git a/spec/services/clusters/applications/install_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/clusters/applications/install_service_spec.rb index a744ec30b65..4bd19f5bd79 100644 --- a/spec/services/clusters/applications/install_service_spec.rb +++ b/spec/services/clusters/applications/install_service_spec.rb @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ describe Clusters::Applications::InstallService do service.execute expect(application).to be_errored - expect(application.status_reason).to match(/kubernetes error:/i) + expect(application.status_reason).to match('Kubernetes error.') end end diff --git a/spec/services/git_tag_push_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/git_tag_push_service_spec.rb index 92159e1e372..2699f6e7bcd 100644 --- a/spec/services/git_tag_push_service_spec.rb +++ b/spec/services/git_tag_push_service_spec.rb @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ require 'spec_helper' describe GitTagPushService do include RepoHelpers + include GitHelpers let(:user) { create(:user) } let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) } @@ -118,9 +119,7 @@ describe GitTagPushService do before do # Create the lightweight tag - Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do - project.repository.raw_repository.rugged.tags.create(tag_name, newrev) - end + rugged_repo(project.repository).tags.create(tag_name, newrev) # Clear tag list cache project.repository.expire_tags_cache diff --git a/spec/services/merge_requests/squash_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/merge_requests/squash_service_spec.rb index 8ab09412f55..53bce15735c 100644 --- a/spec/services/merge_requests/squash_service_spec.rb +++ b/spec/services/merge_requests/squash_service_spec.rb @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ require 'spec_helper' describe MergeRequests::SquashService do + include GitHelpers + let(:service) { described_class.new(project, user, {}) } let(:user) { project.owner } let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) } @@ -63,9 +65,7 @@ describe MergeRequests::SquashService do end it 'has the same diff as the merge request, but a different SHA' do - rugged = Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do - project.repository.rugged - end + rugged = rugged_repo(project.repository) mr_diff = rugged.diff(merge_request.diff_base_sha, merge_request.diff_head_sha) squash_diff = rugged.diff(merge_request.diff_start_sha, squash_sha) diff --git a/spec/services/notification_recipient_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/notification_recipient_service_spec.rb index 14ba6b7bed2..cea5ea125b9 100644 --- a/spec/services/notification_recipient_service_spec.rb +++ b/spec/services/notification_recipient_service_spec.rb @@ -10,27 +10,50 @@ describe NotificationRecipientService do let(:issue) { create(:issue, project: project, assignees: [assignee]) } let(:note) { create(:note_on_issue, noteable: issue, project_id: issue.project_id) } - def create_watcher - watcher = create(:user) - create(:notification_setting, source: project, user: watcher, level: :watch) + shared_examples 'no N+1 queries' do + it 'avoids N+1 queries', :request_store do + create_user - other_projects.each do |other_project| - create(:notification_setting, source: other_project, user: watcher, level: :watch) + service.build_new_note_recipients(note) + + control_count = ActiveRecord::QueryRecorder.new do + service.build_new_note_recipients(note) + end + + create_user + + expect { service.build_new_note_recipients(note) }.not_to exceed_query_limit(control_count) end end - it 'avoids N+1 queries', :request_store do - create_watcher + context 'when there are multiple watchers' do + def create_user + watcher = create(:user) + create(:notification_setting, source: project, user: watcher, level: :watch) + + other_projects.each do |other_project| + create(:notification_setting, source: other_project, user: watcher, level: :watch) + end + end - service.build_new_note_recipients(note) + include_examples 'no N+1 queries' + end - control_count = ActiveRecord::QueryRecorder.new do - service.build_new_note_recipients(note) + context 'when there are multiple subscribers' do + def create_user + subscriber = create(:user) + issue.subscriptions.create(user: subscriber, project: project, subscribed: true) end - create_watcher + include_examples 'no N+1 queries' - expect { service.build_new_note_recipients(note) }.not_to exceed_query_limit(control_count) + context 'when the project is private' do + before do + project.update!(visibility_level: Gitlab::VisibilityLevel::PRIVATE) + end + + include_examples 'no N+1 queries' + end end end end diff --git a/spec/services/projects/after_import_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/projects/after_import_service_spec.rb index cd52bc88f4c..4dd6c6dab86 100644 --- a/spec/services/projects/after_import_service_spec.rb +++ b/spec/services/projects/after_import_service_spec.rb @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ require 'spec_helper' describe Projects::AfterImportService do + include GitHelpers + subject { described_class.new(project) } let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) } @@ -53,7 +55,7 @@ describe Projects::AfterImportService do end def rugged - Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access { repository.rugged } + rugged_repo(repository) end end end diff --git a/spec/services/projects/autocomplete_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/projects/autocomplete_service_spec.rb index e98df375d48..373fe7cb7dd 100644 --- a/spec/services/projects/autocomplete_service_spec.rb +++ b/spec/services/projects/autocomplete_service_spec.rb @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ describe Projects::AutocompleteService do let!(:label1) { create(:label, project: project) } let!(:label2) { create(:label, project: project) } let!(:sub_group_label) { create(:group_label, group: sub_group) } - let!(:parent_group_label) { create(:group_label, group: group.parent) } + let!(:parent_group_label) { create(:group_label, group: group.parent, group_id: group.id) } before do create(:group_member, group: group, user: user) @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ describe Projects::AutocompleteService do it 'returns labels from project and ancestor groups' do service = described_class.new(project, user) - results = service.labels_as_hash + results = service.labels_as_hash(nil) expected_labels = [label1, label2, parent_group_label] expect_labels_to_equal(results, expected_labels) diff --git a/spec/services/projects/create_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/projects/create_service_spec.rb index bb3f1501f0e..a80c8a7fe51 100644 --- a/spec/services/projects/create_service_spec.rb +++ b/spec/services/projects/create_service_spec.rb @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ require 'spec_helper' describe Projects::CreateService, '#execute' do + include GitHelpers + let(:gitlab_shell) { Gitlab::Shell.new } let(:user) { create :user } let(:opts) do @@ -295,9 +297,7 @@ describe Projects::CreateService, '#execute' do it 'writes project full path to .git/config' do project = create_project(user, opts) - rugged = Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do - project.repository.rugged - end + rugged = rugged_repo(project.repository) expect(rugged.config['gitlab.fullpath']).to eq project.full_path end diff --git a/spec/services/projects/hashed_storage/migrate_repository_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/projects/hashed_storage/migrate_repository_service_spec.rb index 5f67c325223..0e82194e9ee 100644 --- a/spec/services/projects/hashed_storage/migrate_repository_service_spec.rb +++ b/spec/services/projects/hashed_storage/migrate_repository_service_spec.rb @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ require 'spec_helper' describe Projects::HashedStorage::MigrateRepositoryService do + include GitHelpers + let(:gitlab_shell) { Gitlab::Shell.new } let(:project) { create(:project, :legacy_storage, :repository, :wiki_repo) } let(:legacy_storage) { Storage::LegacyProject.new(project) } @@ -38,9 +40,7 @@ describe Projects::HashedStorage::MigrateRepositoryService do it 'writes project full path to .git/config' do service.execute - rugged_config = Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do - project.repository.rugged.config['gitlab.fullpath'] - end + rugged_config = rugged_repo(project.repository).config['gitlab.fullpath'] expect(rugged_config).to eq project.full_path end diff --git a/spec/services/projects/transfer_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/projects/transfer_service_spec.rb index 92c5ac7354a..1411723fb9e 100644 --- a/spec/services/projects/transfer_service_spec.rb +++ b/spec/services/projects/transfer_service_spec.rb @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ require 'spec_helper' describe Projects::TransferService do + include GitHelpers + let(:gitlab_shell) { Gitlab::Shell.new } let(:user) { create(:user) } let(:group) { create(:group) } @@ -291,8 +293,6 @@ describe Projects::TransferService do end def rugged_config - Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do - project.repository.rugged.config - end + rugged_repo(project.repository).config end end diff --git a/spec/services/system_note_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/system_note_service_spec.rb index f4b7cb8c90a..a18126ee339 100644 --- a/spec/services/system_note_service_spec.rb +++ b/spec/services/system_note_service_spec.rb @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ describe SystemNoteService do end it "posts the 'merge when pipeline succeeds' system note" do - expect(subject.note).to eq "canceled the automatic merge" + expect(subject.note).to eq "canceled the automatic merge" end end diff --git a/spec/services/users/build_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/users/build_service_spec.rb index b987fe45138..051e8c87f39 100644 --- a/spec/services/users/build_service_spec.rb +++ b/spec/services/users/build_service_spec.rb @@ -14,6 +14,49 @@ describe Users::BuildService do expect(service.execute).to be_valid end + context 'allowed params' do + let(:params) do + { + access_level: 1, + admin: 1, + avatar: anything, + bio: 1, + can_create_group: 1, + color_scheme_id: 1, + email: 1, + external: 1, + force_random_password: 1, + hide_no_password: 1, + hide_no_ssh_key: 1, + linkedin: 1, + name: 1, + password: 1, + password_automatically_set: 1, + password_expires_at: 1, + projects_limit: 1, + remember_me: 1, + skip_confirmation: 1, + skype: 1, + theme_id: 1, + twitter: 1, + username: 1, + website_url: 1, + private_profile: 1, + organization: 1, + location: 1, + public_email: 1 + } + end + + it 'sets all allowed attributes' do + admin_user # call first so the admin gets created before setting `expect` + + expect(User).to receive(:new).with(hash_including(params)).and_call_original + + service.execute + end + end + context 'with "user_default_external" application setting' do using RSpec::Parameterized::TableSyntax diff --git a/spec/support/helpers/cycle_analytics_helpers.rb b/spec/support/helpers/cycle_analytics_helpers.rb index e0fceae88de..83035788a56 100644 --- a/spec/support/helpers/cycle_analytics_helpers.rb +++ b/spec/support/helpers/cycle_analytics_helpers.rb @@ -1,4 +1,6 @@ module CycleAnalyticsHelpers + include GitHelpers + def create_commit_referencing_issue(issue, branch_name: generate(:branch)) project.repository.add_branch(user, branch_name, 'master') create_commit("Commit for ##{issue.iid}", issue.project, user, branch_name) @@ -9,7 +11,7 @@ module CycleAnalyticsHelpers oldrev = repository.commit(branch_name)&.sha || Gitlab::Git::BLANK_SHA if Timecop.frozen? && Gitlab::GitalyClient.feature_enabled?(:operation_user_commit_files) - mock_gitaly_multi_action_dates(repository.raw, commit_time) + mock_gitaly_multi_action_dates(repository, commit_time) end commit_shas = Array.new(count) do |index| @@ -118,18 +120,15 @@ module CycleAnalyticsHelpers protected: false) end - def mock_gitaly_multi_action_dates(raw_repository, commit_time) - allow(raw_repository).to receive(:multi_action).and_wrap_original do |m, *args| + def mock_gitaly_multi_action_dates(repository, commit_time) + allow(repository.raw).to receive(:multi_action).and_wrap_original do |m, *args| new_date = commit_time || Time.now branch_update = m.call(*args) if branch_update.newrev _, opts = args - commit = Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do - rugged = raw_repository.rugged - rugged.rev_parse(branch_update.newrev) - end + commit = rugged_repo(repository).rev_parse(branch_update.newrev) branch_update.newrev = commit.amend( update_ref: "#{Gitlab::Git::BRANCH_REF_PREFIX}#{opts[:branch_name]}", diff --git a/spec/support/helpers/git_helpers.rb b/spec/support/helpers/git_helpers.rb index fc92bc38561..99a7c39852e 100644 --- a/spec/support/helpers/git_helpers.rb +++ b/spec/support/helpers/git_helpers.rb @@ -1,6 +1,12 @@ # frozen_string_literal: true module GitHelpers + def rugged_repo(repository) + path = File.join(TestEnv.repos_path, repository.disk_path + '.git') + + Rugged::Repository.new(path) + end + def project_hook_exists?(project) Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do project_path = project.repository.raw_repository.path diff --git a/spec/support/services/clusters/create_service_shared.rb b/spec/support/services/clusters/create_service_shared.rb index 22f712f3fcf..b0bf942aa09 100644 --- a/spec/support/services/clusters/create_service_shared.rb +++ b/spec/support/services/clusters/create_service_shared.rb @@ -30,10 +30,6 @@ shared_context 'invalid cluster create params' do end shared_examples 'create cluster service success' do - before do - stub_feature_flags(rbac_clusters: false) - end - it 'creates a cluster object and performs a worker' do expect(ClusterProvisionWorker).to receive(:perform_async) diff --git a/spec/support/shared_examples/uploaders/gitlab_uploader_shared_examples.rb b/spec/support/shared_examples/uploaders/gitlab_uploader_shared_examples.rb index 93c21a99e59..1190863d88e 100644 --- a/spec/support/shared_examples/uploaders/gitlab_uploader_shared_examples.rb +++ b/spec/support/shared_examples/uploaders/gitlab_uploader_shared_examples.rb @@ -33,6 +33,14 @@ shared_examples "builds correct paths" do |**patterns| it_behaves_like "matches the method pattern", :upload_path end + describe "#relative_path" do + it 'is relative' do + skip 'Path not set, skipping.' unless subject.path + + expect(Pathname.new(subject.relative_path)).to be_relative + end + end + describe ".absolute_path" do it_behaves_like "matches the method pattern", :absolute_path do let(:target) { subject.class } diff --git a/spec/support/stub_version.rb b/spec/support/stub_version.rb new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..594ab64e7c6 --- /dev/null +++ b/spec/support/stub_version.rb @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +# frozen_string_literal: true + +module StubVersion + def stub_version(version, revision) + stub_const('Gitlab::VERSION', version) + allow(Gitlab).to receive(:revision).and_return(revision) + end +end diff --git a/spec/views/help/index.html.haml_spec.rb b/spec/views/help/index.html.haml_spec.rb index 4b4de540d9e..34e93d929a7 100644 --- a/spec/views/help/index.html.haml_spec.rb +++ b/spec/views/help/index.html.haml_spec.rb @@ -1,11 +1,18 @@ +# frozen_string_literal: true + require 'rails_helper' describe 'help/index' do + include StubVersion + describe 'version information' do + before do + stub_helpers + end + it 'is hidden from guests' do stub_user(nil) stub_version('8.0.2', 'abcdefg') - stub_helpers render @@ -13,15 +20,28 @@ describe 'help/index' do expect(rendered).not_to match 'abcdefg' end - it 'is shown to users' do - stub_user - stub_version('8.0.2', 'abcdefg') - stub_helpers + context 'when logged in' do + before do + stub_user + end - render + it 'shows a link to the tag to users' do + stub_version('8.0.2', 'abcdefg') + + render + + expect(rendered).to match '8.0.2' + expect(rendered).to have_link('8.0.2', href: %r{https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-(ce|ee)/tags/v8.0.2}) + end + + it 'shows a link to the commit for pre-releases' do + stub_version('8.0.2-pre', 'abcdefg') - expect(rendered).to match '8.0.2' - expect(rendered).to have_link('abcdefg', href: 'https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commits/abcdefg') + render + + expect(rendered).to match '8.0.2' + expect(rendered).to have_link('abcdefg', href: %r{https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-(ce|ee)/commits/abcdefg}) + end end end @@ -37,11 +57,6 @@ describe 'help/index' do allow(view).to receive(:user_signed_in?).and_return(user) end - def stub_version(version, revision) - stub_const('Gitlab::VERSION', version) - allow(Gitlab).to receive(:revision).and_return(revision) - end - def stub_helpers allow(view).to receive(:markdown).and_return('') allow(view).to receive(:version_status_badge).and_return('') diff --git a/spec/views/projects/jobs/show.html.haml_spec.rb b/spec/views/projects/jobs/show.html.haml_spec.rb index 496646dc623..e06a9ecb98b 100644 --- a/spec/views/projects/jobs/show.html.haml_spec.rb +++ b/spec/views/projects/jobs/show.html.haml_spec.rb @@ -18,161 +18,6 @@ describe 'projects/jobs/show' do allow(view).to receive(:can?).and_return(true) end - describe 'environment info in job view' do - context 'job with latest deployment' do - let(:build) do - create(:ci_build, :success, :trace_artifact, environment: 'staging') - end - - before do - create(:environment, name: 'staging') - create(:deployment, deployable: build) - end - - it 'shows deployment message' do - expected_text = 'This job is the most recent deployment' - render - - expect(rendered).to have_css( - '.environment-information', text: expected_text) - end - end - - context 'job with outdated deployment' do - let(:build) do - create(:ci_build, :success, :trace_artifact, environment: 'staging', pipeline: pipeline) - end - - let(:second_build) do - create(:ci_build, :success, :trace_artifact, environment: 'staging', pipeline: pipeline) - end - - let(:environment) do - create(:environment, name: 'staging', project: project) - end - - let!(:first_deployment) do - create(:deployment, environment: environment, deployable: build) - end - - let!(:second_deployment) do - create(:deployment, environment: environment, deployable: second_build) - end - - it 'shows deployment message' do - expected_text = 'This job is an out-of-date deployment ' \ - "to staging.\nView the most recent deployment ##{second_deployment.iid}." - render - - expect(rendered).to have_css('.environment-information', text: expected_text) - end - end - - context 'job failed to deploy' do - let(:build) do - create(:ci_build, :failed, :trace_artifact, environment: 'staging', pipeline: pipeline) - end - - let!(:environment) do - create(:environment, name: 'staging', project: project) - end - - it 'shows deployment message' do - expected_text = 'The deployment of this job to staging did not succeed.' - render - - expect(rendered).to have_css( - '.environment-information', text: expected_text) - end - end - - context 'job will deploy' do - let(:build) do - create(:ci_build, :running, :trace_live, environment: 'staging', pipeline: pipeline) - end - - context 'when environment exists' do - let!(:environment) do - create(:environment, name: 'staging', project: project) - end - - it 'shows deployment message' do - expected_text = 'This job is creating a deployment to staging' - render - - expect(rendered).to have_css( - '.environment-information', text: expected_text) - end - - context 'when it has deployment' do - let!(:deployment) do - create(:deployment, environment: environment) - end - - it 'shows that deployment will be overwritten' do - expected_text = 'This job is creating a deployment to staging' - render - - expect(rendered).to have_css( - '.environment-information', text: expected_text) - expect(rendered).to have_css( - '.environment-information', text: 'latest deployment') - end - end - end - - context 'when environment does not exist' do - it 'shows deployment message' do - expected_text = 'This job is creating a deployment to staging' - render - - expect(rendered).to have_css( - '.environment-information', text: expected_text) - expect(rendered).not_to have_css( - '.environment-information', text: 'latest deployment') - end - end - end - - context 'job that failed to deploy and environment has not been created' do - let(:build) do - create(:ci_build, :failed, :trace_artifact, environment: 'staging', pipeline: pipeline) - end - - let!(:environment) do - create(:environment, name: 'staging', project: project) - end - - it 'shows deployment message' do - expected_text = 'The deployment of this job to staging did not succeed' - render - - expect(rendered).to have_css( - '.environment-information', text: expected_text) - end - end - - context 'job that will deploy and environment has not been created' do - let(:build) do - create(:ci_build, :running, :trace_live, environment: 'staging', pipeline: pipeline) - end - - let!(:environment) do - create(:environment, name: 'staging', project: project) - end - - it 'shows deployment message' do - expected_text = 'This job is creating a deployment to staging' - render - - expect(rendered).to have_css( - '.environment-information', text: expected_text) - expect(rendered).not_to have_css( - '.environment-information', text: 'latest deployment') - end - end - end - context 'when job is running' do let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :trace_live, :running, pipeline: pipeline) } diff --git a/spec/views/projects/merge_requests/creations/_new_submit.html.haml_spec.rb b/spec/views/projects/merge_requests/creations/_new_submit.html.haml_spec.rb index 8befae39d3a..0206928a211 100644 --- a/spec/views/projects/merge_requests/creations/_new_submit.html.haml_spec.rb +++ b/spec/views/projects/merge_requests/creations/_new_submit.html.haml_spec.rb @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ describe 'projects/merge_requests/creations/_new_submit.html.haml' do assign(:hidden_commit_count, 0) assign(:total_commit_count, merge_request.commits.count) assign(:project, merge_request.target_project) + assign(:mr_presenter, merge_request.present(current_user: merge_request.author)) allow(view).to receive(:can?).and_return(true) allow(view).to receive(:url_for).and_return('#') diff --git a/spec/views/projects/merge_requests/edit.html.haml_spec.rb b/spec/views/projects/merge_requests/edit.html.haml_spec.rb index 9b74a7e1946..c13eab30054 100644 --- a/spec/views/projects/merge_requests/edit.html.haml_spec.rb +++ b/spec/views/projects/merge_requests/edit.html.haml_spec.rb @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ describe 'projects/merge_requests/edit.html.haml' do before do assign(:project, project) assign(:merge_request, closed_merge_request) + assign(:mr_presenter, closed_merge_request.present(current_user: user)) allow(view).to receive(:can?).and_return(true) allow(view).to receive(:current_user) diff --git a/spec/workers/git_garbage_collect_worker_spec.rb b/spec/workers/git_garbage_collect_worker_spec.rb index 30e67e67e0e..a159f24f876 100644 --- a/spec/workers/git_garbage_collect_worker_spec.rb +++ b/spec/workers/git_garbage_collect_worker_spec.rb @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ require 'fileutils' require 'spec_helper' describe GitGarbageCollectWorker do + include GitHelpers + let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) } let(:shell) { Gitlab::Shell.new } let!(:lease_uuid) { SecureRandom.uuid } @@ -197,9 +199,7 @@ describe GitGarbageCollectWorker do # Create a new commit on a random new branch def create_objects(project) - rugged = Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do - project.repository.rugged - end + rugged = rugged_repo(project.repository) old_commit = rugged.branches.first.target new_commit_sha = Rugged::Commit.create( rugged, diff --git a/spec/workers/repository_remove_remote_worker_spec.rb b/spec/workers/repository_remove_remote_worker_spec.rb index a653f6f926c..6ddb653d142 100644 --- a/spec/workers/repository_remove_remote_worker_spec.rb +++ b/spec/workers/repository_remove_remote_worker_spec.rb @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ require 'rails_helper' describe RepositoryRemoveRemoteWorker do include ExclusiveLeaseHelpers + include GitHelpers describe '#perform' do let!(:project) { create(:project, :repository) } @@ -50,9 +51,7 @@ describe RepositoryRemoveRemoteWorker do end def create_remote_branch(remote_name, branch_name, target) - rugged = Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do - project.repository.rugged - end + rugged = rugged_repo(project.repository) rugged.references.create("refs/remotes/#{remote_name}/#{branch_name}", target.id) end |