| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Removed `margin-bottom`
Corrected commit-actions margin
Reverted action margin for a more logical approach
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Remove prefixes from transition CSS property
## What does this MR do?
Removes vendor prefixes from the CSS transition property
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
None
## Why was this MR needed?
Reduces unnecessary CSS
## Screenshots (if relevant)
None
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #21614
See merge request !6093
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Add curve to generic commit status pipeline
#### What does this MR do?
Add curve to generic commit status pipeline
#### Screenshots (if relevant)
Before:
![Screen_Shot_2016-09-01_at_1.35.29_PM](/uploads/e4585462d50d426bcad66ae571387ddc/Screen_Shot_2016-09-01_at_1.35.29_PM.png)
After:
![Screen_Shot_2016-09-01_at_1.35.21_PM](/uploads/fe62a7e5fc27c9c1bb3553fdc63c5cc6/Screen_Shot_2016-09-01_at_1.35.21_PM.png)
See merge request !6156
|
| | | |
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Enable Ruby 2.3 for rubocop too
See merge request !6153
|
| | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Optimize branch lookups and force a repository reload for Repository#find_branch
See merge request !6087
|
| |/ / /
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
If `git gc` runs and `Repository` has an instance to `Rugged::Repository`, a
bug in libgit2 may cause the instance to return a stale value or a missing
branch. This change not only optimizes the branch lookup so we don't have
to iterate through every branch, but it also works around the `git gc`
issue by forcing a repository reload every time `Repository#find_branch`
is called.
See: https://github.com/libgit2/libgit2/issues/1534
Closes #15392, #21470
|
|\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Some minor updates to upgrade guides for 8.12.
See merge request !6154
|
| | | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|/ /
|/| | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Resolve "Inconsistency: Repo Title "down caret" cropped on smaller viewports"
## What does this MR do?
Fixes an issue where the dropdown chevron for a project list was not visible on smaller viewports.
This MR also changes the dropdown trigger into a `button` element for better accessibility (it can now be tabbed to like any link).
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
None that I can think of.
## Why was this MR needed?
Better accessibility and support for smaller viewports.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
Dropdown toggle now targetable by pressing tab to select.
![Screen_Shot_2016-08-31_at_9.12.15_PM](/uploads/8b2038a8ae259efd32da2e94a309ce88/Screen_Shot_2016-08-31_at_9.12.15_PM.png)
Chevron no longer hidden when project title length triggers `overflow: ellipsis`.
![Screen_Shot_2016-08-31_at_9.13.38_PM](/uploads/382e76c06e54bc307106a84ec21ab892/Screen_Shot_2016-08-31_at_9.13.38_PM.png)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] CHANGELOG entry added
- Tests
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #21506
See merge request !6140
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | |/ /
| |/| | |
|
|\ \ \ \
| |_|/ /
|/| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Replace play icon font with svg
## What does this MR do?
Replaces the `play` font awesome icon with svg
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Make sure that the svg is looking great on all the changed pages
## Why was this MR needed?
SVG is better than fonts :smile:
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
#21455
## Screenshots (if relevant)
Before (Pipeline):
![Screen_Shot_2016-08-26_at_4.16.16_PM](/uploads/90a75b91b516e643f2134e053b0d7590/Screen_Shot_2016-08-26_at_4.16.16_PM.png)
After (Pipeline):
![Screen_Shot_2016-08-26_at_4.15.49_PM](/uploads/44e44a3d4c14066b8b7ec8c3da36e012/Screen_Shot_2016-08-26_at_4.15.49_PM.png)
Before (Environments):
![Screen_Shot_2016-08-31_at_3.03.35_PM](/uploads/bd4087a9f01c1a4d3c373d2662df4fe5/Screen_Shot_2016-08-31_at_3.03.35_PM.png)
After (Environments):
![Screen_Shot_2016-08-31_at_3.00.23_PM](/uploads/0ec45031bedb271f16bea3544cbfe52b/Screen_Shot_2016-08-31_at_3.00.23_PM.png)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !6038
|
| |/ / |
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Center build stage columns in pipeline overview
## What does this MR do?
Centers the build stage table content and headers in the [pipeline view](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/pipelines)
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Need to check whether it is okay to remove the following ([commit that added this property](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/6130376ad6673facb729b78878f9156a29948a5b))
```
.light {
width: 3px;
}
```
## Why was this MR needed?
Improve UI
## Screenshots (if relevant)
Before:
![Screen_Shot_2016-08-31_at_12.46.43_PM](/uploads/cc4973d2155b59b32ec6fde714fbc26d/Screen_Shot_2016-08-31_at_12.46.43_PM.png)
After:
![Screen_Shot_2016-08-31_at_12.46.28_PM](/uploads/561d7b3973398c827d88870b38136c7d/Screen_Shot_2016-08-31_at_12.46.28_PM.png)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #21708
See merge request !6135
|
| | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Project tools visibility level
## part of #19734
![project_features_access_level](/uploads/81ec7185d4e61d7578652020209af925/project_features_access_level.png)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] API support added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5606
|
| | | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Merge request sha info
## What does this MR do?
Exposes `sha` and `merge_commit_sha` items in `MergeRequest` API endpoint data.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
No.
## Why was this MR needed?
It's useful information.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #20456.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
N/A
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] API support added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5966
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Fixes #20456.
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Use JavaScript tooltips for mentions
## What does this MR do?
- use JavaScript tooltips instead of plain title for mentions (issue, merge request, snippet, user, group, commit, commit range, milestone)
## Why was this MR needed?
JavaScript tooltips look nicer and can wrap.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/5261#note_13106713, fixes #21500
See merge request !5301
|
| | | | | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Order award tooltips by their created_at date
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #20601
See merge request !6086
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
into 'master'
Fix suggested colors options for new labels in the admin area
## What does this MR do?
Execute the JS related to the suggested colors options when user access the new label in the admin area.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
No.
## Why was this MR needed?
Clicking in a suggested color when creating a new label in the admin area don't change the background color.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
* Before
![2016-08-31_19.56.14](/uploads/3d50236dac578910c5062aa1e83da350/2016-08-31_19.56.14.gif)
* After
![2016-08-31_19.58.59](/uploads/376ffdcbb5b80ef51ab1d642fe9486d0/2016-08-31_19.58.59.gif)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [X] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [X] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [X] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/21726
See merge request !6138
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |_|_|/ / / /
| |/| | | | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Expire commit view partial after a day
See merge request !6128
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
We rarely use Russian-doll caching in views, and when we do, it's
typically with a naturally-invalidating key. In the case of the commit
partial, though, the author lookup isn't part of the cache key - because
we're not going to use the state of the users table - and so a new email
address can take up to two weeks to show against the commits list.
Limiting this to a day still caches the partial for a healthy amount of
time, without as bad a worst case scenario.
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|_|_|_|_|/ /
|/| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Add MR Documentation description template
Add an MR Documentation template for `gitlab-ce`.
See merge request !6145
|
| | |/ / / / / /
| |/| | | | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|_|_|_|/ /
|/| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Hide group control nav if no options present
## What does this MR do?
Hides the group nav controls if no options present in the dropdown.
Also fixed the alignment of the dropdown to match the project page.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #19120
See merge request !5155
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Closes #19120
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|/ / / / / /
|/| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
'gh-importer-use-default-project-visibility-for-non-private-projects' into 'master'
GitHub importer use default project visibility for non-private projects
## What does this MR do?
GitHub importer use the `Default Project Visibility` setting for all non-private projects.
## Why was this MR needed?
This allow users to import projects when `Public` visibility is restricted.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes #21437
See merge request !6023
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
|/ / / / / / / |
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|_|/ / /
|/| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Refactor ability.rb into Policies
## What does this MR do?
Factors out `ability.rb` into a new abstraction - the "policy" (stored in `app/policies`). A policy is a class named `#{class_name}Policy` (looked up automatically as needed) that implements `rules` as follows:
``` ruby
class ThingPolicy < BasePolicy
def rules
@user # this is a user to determine abilities for, optionally nil in the anonymous case
@subject # this is the subject of the ability, guaranteed to be an instance of `Thing`
can! :some_ability # grant the :some_ability permission
cannot! :some_ability # ensure that :some_ability is not allowed. this overrides any `can!` that is called before or after
delegate! @subject.other_thing # merge the abilities (can!) and prohibitions (cannot!) from `@subject.other_thing`
can? :some_ability # test whether, so far, :some_ability is allowed
end
def anonymous_rules
# optional. if not implemented `rules` is called where `@user` is nil. otherwise this method is called when `@user` is nil.
end
end
```
See merge request !5796
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|