summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Try to adopt what Discourse is using right now:adopt-email_reply_trimmerLin Jen-Shin2016-08-054-57/+181
| | | | | | | | https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/20514#note_13560164 See also: Issue #3020, #14805, #20514
* Merge branch 'leading-slashes-relative-links' into 'master' Rémy Coutable2016-08-053-1/+8
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ignore URLs starting with // in Markdown links ## What does this MR do? Render `[foo](//bar/baz)` as `<a href="//bar/baz">foo</a>`. ## Why was this MR needed? `[foo](//bar/baz)` currently renders as `<a href="//bar/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/master/baz">foo</a>` ## What are the relevant issue numbers? fixes #7032 See merge request !5677
| * Ignore URLs starting with // (!5677)winniehell2016-08-052-1/+3
| |
| * Add failing test for #7032winniehell2016-08-051-0/+5
| |
* | Merge branch 'add_description_to_plain_text' into 'master' Rémy Coutable2016-08-053-0/+5
|\ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add issue description to txt/plain emails ## What does this MR do? Adds issue description to new_issue mail when in text/plain content-type ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? ## Why was this MR needed? Because clients that are rendering emails in text mode can see issue description ## What are the relevant issue numbers? #1821 ## Screenshots (if relevant) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !5663
| * | Add description to text/plain emailsdixpac2016-08-043-0/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Added to * new_issue_email * new_merge_request_email
* | | Merge branch 'side-by-side-unfold' into 'master' Douwe Maan2016-08-0515-89/+139
|\ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add unfold links for Side-by-Side view ## What does this MR do? Add unfold links for Side-by-Side view and refactor some diff related code ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #3877 ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [x] API support added - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !5415
| * | | Add unfold links for Side-by-Side viewTim Masliuchenko2016-08-0415-89/+139
| | | |
* | | | Merge branch 'upgrade-newrelic-rpm' into 'master' Robert Speicher2016-08-042-3/+3
|\ \ \ \ | |_|_|/ |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Upgrade newrelic_rpm from 3.14.1.311 to 3.16.0.318. ## What does this MR do? While we intend to remove newrelic in the future, it'll probably not happen until 9.0 due to. In the meantime, I'd like to update the gem so it won't block Rails 5. Changelog: https://github.com/newrelic/rpm/blob/master/CHANGELOG ## Why was this MR needed? Rails 5 compatibility. Relevant issues: #14286, #12860 See merge request !5553
| * | | Upgrade newrelic_rpm from 3.14.1.311 to 3.16.0.318.upgrade-newrelic-rpmConnor Shea2016-07-282-3/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Bug fixes and compatibility with Rails 5. Changelog: https://github.com/newrelic/rpm/blob/master/CHANGELOG
* | | | Merge branch '20621-avoid-lame-conflicts-in-ability-allowed' into 'master' Robert Speicher2016-08-041-0/+4
|\ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Move abilities by subject class to a dedicated method ## What does this MR do? Twin of gitlab-org/gitlab-ee!622. It moves the `case` that returns abilities depending on the subject class to a dedicated method. This should avoid lame conflicts when CE to EE since the EE version assign the result of the `case` to a variable. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #20621. See merge request !5668
| * | | | Move abilities by subject class to a dedicated method20621-avoid-lame-conflicts-in-ability-allowedRémy Coutable2016-08-041-0/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This will avoid lame conflicts when merging CE to EE Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
* | | | | Merge branch '20568-fix-member-data-again' into 'master' Douwe Maan2016-08-042-1/+22
|\ \ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add a data migration to fix some missing timestamps in the members table (again) ## What does this MR do? Repeats an earlier migration to fix historic bad data in the members table (missing created_at and updated_at fields) ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? I'm expecting the WHERE clauses to be fast enough, and to return few enough rows, that the migration doesn't need to use batches, but I'm not too familiar with the size of these tables in the wild, so perhaps that's a poor assumption. ## Why was this MR needed? 8.10 introduced a dependency on the `members.created_at` field in the project and namespace member view. If bad data is present, viewing the list of members now results in an NoMethodError and a 500 response from GitLab. Although the previous migration should have fixed all bad rows, we have evidence that it didn't in at least one case, despite the migration claiming to have run in the past. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? #20568 ## Screenshots (if relevant) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) Closes #20568 See merge request !5670
| * | | | | Add missing DOWNTIME constant to the AddTimestampsToMembersAgain migrationNick Thomas2016-08-041-0/+1
| | | | | |
| * | | | | Add a data migration to fix some missing timestamps in the members table (again)Nick Thomas2016-08-042-1/+21
| |/ / / /
* | | | | Merge branch 'dz-improve-content-list' into 'master' Dmitriy Zaporozhets2016-08-044-17/+11
|\ \ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Set consistency in list text height css Fix line height of list row. Now its 42px everywhere. Before this merge request certain row height varied from 40 to 45px. Sometimes even inside one list. cc @jschatz1 @connorshea See merge request !5666
| * | | | | Remove unnecessary empty line after css vardz-improve-content-listDmitriy Zaporozhets2016-08-041-1/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
| * | | | | Set consistency in list text height cssDmitriy Zaporozhets2016-08-044-17/+12
| | |_|_|/ | |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
* | | | | Merge branch '20609-fix-protected-branch-access-levels-migration' into 'master' Douwe Maan2016-08-042-4/+4
|\ \ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Migrate protected branch access levels to match constants in `Gitlab::Access` Closes #20606 Context: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/20606#note_13561628 See merge request !5658
| * | | | | Migrate protected branch access levels to match constants in `Gitlab::Access`20609-fix-protected-branch-access-levels-migrationTimothy Andrew2016-08-042-4/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - In the final round of review (!5081), we moved the protected branch access levels from Rails enums to constants from Gitlab::Access. - The migrations that moved us from the old data model (a single protected_branches table with developers_can_push and developers_can_merge flags) to the new one (separate tables for push_access_levels and merge_access_levels) was not updated. - These migrations still used 0 to mean "Masters" and 1 to mean "Developers" (matching the previous Rails enum), while Gitlab::Access uses 40 and 30 for these, respectively. - Once the migrations run, our data gets into a broken state. - We fix this by migrating all `0`s to `40` and all `1`s to `30`. - https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/20606#note_13561628 = Caveats = - In Gitlab::Access, 0 represents NO_ACCESS. When we run this migration, all protected branches with "No one" as an access level will be changed to "Masters"
* | | | | | Merge branch 'fix-add-column-with-default-null' into 'master' Douwe Maan2016-08-042-2/+2
|\ \ \ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Fix `#down` for two protected branches-related migrations. - The migrations called `add_column_with_default` with a `null` option, which the Rails `add_column` method accepts. This fails because `add_column_with_default` expects an `allow_null` option instead. - The migrations have been fixed to use `allow_null`. See merge request !5660
| * | | | | | Fix `#down` for two protected branches-related migrations.fix-add-column-with-default-nullTimothy Andrew2016-08-042-2/+2
| |/ / / / / | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - The migrations called `add_column_with_default` with a `null` option, which the Rails `add_column` method accepts. This fails because `add_column_with_default` expects an `allow_null` option instead. - The migrations have been fixed to use `allow_null`.
* | | | | | Merge branch 'doc-artifacts-refactor' into 'master' Achilleas Pipinellis2016-08-0414-176/+222
|\ \ \ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Refactor build artifacts documentation ## What does this MR do? - Split user and admin documentation - Use new location paths - Add new Continuous Integration guide for the Admin area - Link to new guide from the Admin area ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/20612 See merge request !5662
| * | | | | | Fix relative URLdoc-artifacts-refactorAchilleas Pipinellis2016-08-041-2/+2
| | | | | | |
| * | | | | | Refactor build artifacts documentationAchilleas Pipinellis2016-08-0414-176/+222
| | |_|_|_|/ | |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Split user and admin documentation - Use new location paths - Add new Continuous Integration guide for the Admin area - Link to new guide from the Admin area
* | | | | | Update CHANGELOG for 8.10.4Rémy Coutable2016-08-041-4/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
* | | | | | Merge branch 'master' of https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhqRémy Coutable2016-08-042-1/+14
|\ \ \ \ \ \
| * \ \ \ \ \ Merge branch '20527-fork-commits-have-impact-on-original-project' into 'master' Rémy Coutable2016-08-042-1/+14
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ | | |_|_|/ / / | |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Don’t close issues on original project Closes #20527 -> https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/20527 See merge request !1981
| | * | | | | Don’t close issues on original project from a forkPaco Guzman2016-08-042-1/+14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Paco Guzman <pacoguzmanp@gmail.com>
* | | | | | | Merge branch 'fixtures-improvements' into 'master' Kamil Trzciński2016-08-041-24/+21
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ | |_|_|_|_|/ / |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Improve CI fixtures cc @ayufan See merge request !5645
| * | | | | | Improve CI fixturesfixtures-improvementsZ.J. van de Weg2016-08-031-24/+21
| | | | | | |
* | | | | | | Merge branch ↵Rémy Coutable2016-08-046-14/+15
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ | |_|/ / / / / |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | '20512-fix-rename-add-users-into-project-to-add-users-to-project-and-projects-ids-to-project-ids' into 'master' Fix Rename `add_users_into_project` and `projects_ids` ## What does this MR do? Only modifies the name of a method that leaves more semantic and expressive and the name of the keywords arguments to the rails convention. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Only if it has been changed at every point that is calling this method and that passing arguments. ## Why was this MR needed? To make the code more expressive. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #20512. - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - Tests - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !5659
| * | | | | | Fix Rename `add_users_into_project` and `projects_ids`Herminio Torres2016-08-046-14/+15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We never add things `into` projects, we just add them `to` projects. So how about we rename this to `add_users_to_project`. Rename `projects_ids` to `project_ids` by following the convention of rails.
* | | | | | | Merge branch 'fix/ha-mode-import-issue' into 'master' Rémy Coutable2016-08-049-15/+106
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ | |/ / / / / / |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Fix Import/Export not working in HA mode Use a shared path instead of `Tempfile` default `/tmp` so the import file is accessible by any GitLab instance. Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/20506 - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - Tests - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !5618
| * | | | | | fix specJames Lopez2016-08-041-1/+1
| | | | | | |
| * | | | | | using shared path for project import uploads and refactored gitlab remove ↵James Lopez2016-08-049-15/+106
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | export worker
* | | | | | | Merge branch 'coffescript_docs_migration' into 'master' Rémy Coutable2016-08-042-3/+5
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Update docs for CoffeeScript -> JavaScript. ## What does this MR do? Removes some CoffeeScript docs and adds more JS ones ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? No ## Why was this MR needed? To migrate some docs ## What are the relevant issue numbers? #20098 ## Screenshots (if relevant) None ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !5433
| * | | | | | | Remove CHANGELOG and fix typoRémy Coutable2016-08-042-3/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
| * | | | | | | Update docs for CoffeeScript migrationcoffescript_docs_migrationJacob Schatz2016-07-221-0/+1
| | | | | | | |
| * | | | | | | Update docs for CoffeeScript -> JavaScript.Jacob Schatz2016-07-222-3/+5
| | | | | | | |
* | | | | | | | Merge branch ↵Yorick Peterse2016-08-043-2/+11
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | '20491-remove-unnecessary-index_projects_on_builds_enabled-index-from-the-projects-table' into 'master' Remove unnecessary index_projects_on_builds_enabled index from the projects table See merge request !5611
| * | | | | | | | Remove unnecessary index_projects_on_builds_enabled index from the projects ↵20491-remove-unnecessary-index_projects_on_builds_enabled-index-from-the-projects-tableAlejandro Rodríguez2016-08-033-2/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | table
* | | | | | | | | Merge branch 'devise-deprecations' into 'master' Rémy Coutable2016-08-047-6/+7
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Fix Devise deprecation warnings by updating omniauth provider paths to use the new Devise/Rails 5 format. See merge request !5331
| * | | | | | | | | Remove provider path, replace with dynamic path.devise-deprecationsConnor Shea2016-08-038-12/+7
| | | | | | | | | |
| * | | | | | | | | Add an oauth provider path helper.Connor Shea2016-08-035-4/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The helper constructs the path for a given oauth provider since Devise 4.0 deprecated passing the provider to the omniauth authentication path. Fixes #18110.
* | | | | | | | | | Structure the development documentationSid Sijbrandij2016-08-041-7/+26
| | | | | | | | | |
* | | | | | | | | | One link to development guides.Sid Sijbrandij2016-08-041-3/+1
| | | | | | | | | |
* | | | | | | | | | Merge branch 'instrument-gitlab-highlight' into 'master' Rémy Coutable2016-08-042-0/+4
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Instrument Gitlab::Highlight ## What does this MR do? This instruments the class `Gitlab::Highlight`. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? No. ## Why was this MR needed? This class is not instrumented. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? #18592 ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !5644
| * | | | | | | | | | Instrument Gitlab::Highlightinstrument-gitlab-highlightYorick Peterse2016-08-032-0/+4
| | |_|_|_|/ / / / / | |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This class does quite a few interesting things so let's instrument it so we can see how much time is being spent in this class.
* | | | | | | | | | Merge branch 'fix/confusing-blocked-user-description' into 'master' Achilleas Pipinellis2016-08-042-5/+4
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Fix confusing description of a blocked user. ## What does this MR do? Rewrite confusing description of a blocked user in admin settings. If someone is blocked, the same message is displayed as if he is unblocked. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? No. ## Why was this MR needed? Because it seems that this is a cosmetic bug. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? None. ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![blocked_user](/uploads/0782a82760ae19661d69c63a97daaf33/blocked_user.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [x] API support added - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !5582