| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Dumping too many jobs in the same queue (e.g. the "default" queue) is a
dangerous setup. Jobs that take a long time to process can effectively
block any other work from being performed given there are enough of
these jobs.
Furthermore it becomes harder to monitor the jobs as a single queue
could contain jobs for different workers. In such a setup the only
reliable way of getting counts per job is to iterate over all jobs in a
queue, which is a rather time consuming process.
By using separate queues for various workers we have better control over
throughput, we can add weight to queues, and we can monitor queues
better. Some workers still use the same queue whenever their work is
related. For example, the various CI pipeline workers use the same
"pipeline" queue.
This commit includes a Rails migration that moves Sidekiq jobs from the
old queues to the new ones. This migration also takes care of doing the
inverse if ever needed. This does require downtime as otherwise new jobs
could be scheduled in the old queues after this migration completes.
This commit also includes an RSpec test that blacklists the use of the
"default" queue and ensures cron workers use the "cronjob" queue.
Fixes gitlab-org/gitlab-ce#23370
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fix project member access levels
Migrate invalid project members (owner -> master)
Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/18616
See merge request !6957
|
| | | |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Update Documentation image when configuring Build emails in Services
## What does this MR do?
Replace old GitLab image in documentation with a new image showing the new position of Services and the module 'Build emails'
## Why was this MR needed?
GitLab's layout changed with version 8.9 and the buttons were moved.
See merge request !5139
|
| | | | |
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Fix broken label uniqueness label migration
The previous implementation of the migration failed on staging because
the migration was attempted to remove labels from projects that did not
actually have duplicates. This occurred because the SQL query did not
account for the project ID when selecting the labels.
To replicate the problem:
1. Disable the uniqueness validation in app/models/label.rb.
2. Create a duplicate label "bug" in project A.
3. Create the same label in project B with label "bug".
The migration will attempt to remove the label in B even if there are no duplicates.
To fix the issue, include the project ID when selecting the labels.
Closes #23609
See merge request !7030
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
The previous implementation of the migration failed on staging because
the migration was attempted to remove labels from projects that did not
actually have duplicates. This occurred because the SQL query did not
account for the project ID when selecting the labels.
To replicate the problem:
1. Disable the uniqueness validation in app/models/label.rb.
2. Create a duplicate label "bug" in project A.
3. Create the same label in project B with label "bug".
The migration will attempt to remove the label in B even if there are no duplicates.
Closes #23609
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Change target Ruby version for RuboCop to 2.1
We have to use the lowest common denominator to check the supported syntax and in our case it is Ruby 2.1. Please note that it will not help with unsupported syntax in HAML files because they are not checked by Rubocop.
See merge request !6978
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
We have to use the lowest common denominator to check the supported syntax
and in our case it is Ruby 2.1.
Please note that it will not help with unsupported syntax in HAML files
because they are not checked by Rubocop.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
[Doc] Fix `ref` parameter name for `commits/statuses`
The attribute to filter by branch or tag needs to be named `ref`, not `ref_name`. And indeed the attribute in the JSON response is `ref` (and not `ref_name`).
Tested on Gitlab CE 8.9.
See merge request !4876
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
The attribute to filter by branch or tag needs to be named `ref`,
not `ref_name`. And indeed the attribute in the JSON response is `ref`
(and not `ref_name`).
Tested on Gitlab CE 8.9.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|/ / /
|/| | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
'master'
Use MergeRequestsClosingIssues cache data on Issue#closed_by_merge_requests method
See merge request !6996
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
method
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Disable warming of the asset cache in Spinach tests under CI
I suspect some combination of Knapsack tests cause no regular Rack tests
to be loaded (i.e. all JavaScript tests), which leads to the error:
ArgumentError: rack-test requires a rack application, but none was given
In CI, we precompile all the assets so there is no need to warm the
asset cache in any case.
Closes #23613
See merge request !7033
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
I suspect some combination of Knapsack tests cause no regular Rack tests
to be loaded (i.e. all JavaScript tests), which leads to the error:
ArgumentError: rack-test requires a rack application, but none was given
In CI, we precompile all the assets so there is no need to warm the
asset cache in any case.
Closes #23613
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Edit glossary
Grammar fixes & new additions to the glossary page.
See merge request !7027
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|/ / / / / /
|/| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
'12622-backup-restore-doesn-t-clear-cache-resulting-in-missing-branches-and-tags' into 'master'
Fix: Backup restore doesn't clear cache
## What does this MR do?
Clears cache when we do backup restoring. Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/12622
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/12622
See merge request !7019
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
'3212-trim-white-space-at-start-and-end-when-creating-new-project' into 'master'
Trim project_path whitespace on form submit
## What does this MR do?
Trim leading/trailing whitespace on project_path input when focus leaves.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
If tests are deemed necessary?
## Why was this MR needed?
To handle a reported bug #3212.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #3212
See merge request !6710
|
| |/ / / / / / / /
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
When the form is submitted, any leading and/or trailing whitespace is trimmed.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Don't use Hash#slice since it's not supported in Ruby 2.1
There is currently a build failure in `master` and this MR fixes it. The issue was introduced by !6879.
The problem is that `Hash#slice` doesn't exists in Ruby 2.1. I've created an issue to take care of the other places we're using `Hash#slice`: #23590
See merge request !7025
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
[ci skip] Add a comment explaining validate_board_limit callback
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/929
See merge request !7023
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Callback associations are not common to see around. We want to make
clear that the `before_add` callback uses the number before the
addition, in this particular case 1.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Fix GitLab project import when a user has access only to their default namespace
## What does this MR do?
It fixes a bug when a namespace ID was not passed to `/import/gitlab_project/new` page. It occurred when a user have no choice of the namespace, so we did not render the input for namespace ID. This MR introduces a hidden input for the described case.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes #23507
See merge request !6995
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
namespace.
Render a hidden field with namespace ID so it can be read by JavaScript
and passed to "/import/gitlab_project/new" screen.
|
| | | |_|_|_|_|_|/ / /
| |/| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Refactor the spec file:
- remove hardcoded record IDs
- avoid top-level let if not used in all scenarios
- prefer expect { ... }.to change { ... }.from(0).to(1) over checking
that there are no records at the beginning of the test
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Create protected branches bundle
Backport changes from https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/merge_requests/645
See merge request !6909
|
| | | |_|/ / / / / / /
| |/| | | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |/ / / / / / / / /
|/| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Use iid deployment refs
This fixes the 404, because `find_by` will return nil instead of throwing an error.
See merge request !7021
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
This patch makes sure GitLab does not save the refs to the filesystem
each time the deployment is updated. This will save some IO although I
expect the impact to be minimal.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|/ / / / / / /
|/| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Preserve note_type and position for notes from emails
Closes #23208
See merge request !7010
|
| | |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | |_|/ / / / / /
| | |/| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
preserve-note_type-and-position
* upstream/master:
Restrict ProjectCacheWorker jobs to one per 15 min
Removed code from project members controller
Make label API spec independent of order
Refactoring find_commits functionality
Differentiate the expire from leave event
Remove pagination description from individual doc
Fix a broken table in Project API doc
Create project feature when project is created
Simpler arguments passed to named_route on toggle_award_url helper method
Fixed height of issue board blank state
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Closes #23208
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Update duration at the end of pipeline
## What does this MR do?
Moves duration calculation to be done only once at the end of pipeline processing.
Currently this is done every one build.
## Why was this MR needed?
This is the simplest thing that we can do before properly implementing duration calculation: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23523#note_17145614
This is ~Performance improvement that significantly affects: http://performance.gitlab.net/dashboard/db/sidekiq-workers?var-worker=PipelineUpdateWorker%23perform&var-database=Production&from=now-1h&to=now
See merge request !6987
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Render HipChat notification descriptions as HTML instead of raw markdown
## What does this MR do?
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/1621 for issues, merge requests and comments.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
This MR is small enough to double check everything.
## Why was this MR needed?
Because seeing raw markdown in HipChat notifications is not nice :)
See merge request !6371
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The `class` and `data-*` attributes are meaningless in HipChat, and it
would probably be better to limit the tags, too. For example, we could
avoid block-level elements in `render_line`.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
"pipeline: :single_line" leaves the protocol/host part out of the URLs
and caches them that way. To avoid giving those out to HipChat, markdown
is always rendered with "pipeline: :email" first.
There must be a better way to do this, but I can't see how to avoid the
link caching.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Using "pipeline: :email" gets "only_path: false" into the context to
produce full URLs instead of /namespace/project/...
|
