| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Conflicts:
app/models/ci/pipeline.rb
app/models/commit_status.rb
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fix broken left sidebar navigation
Sidebar navigation is broken and it's introduced in !6627. Sidebar pin and hamburger icons were `a` tag before with `#` link on them. That was the main reason why page jumps to top. !6627 was trying to prevent default action but it interferes with the navigation links. I don't want to tweak event listeners for sidebar, instead I just replaced `a` elements with `div` because I think there is no point to have them as `a`.
/cc @dzaporozhets @jschatz1
PS: This MR basically reverts !6627. I don't want to add another revert commit instead I reverted it in my editor and committed.
See merge request !6648
|
| | | |
|
| |\ \
| |/
|/|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Add a /wip slash command to toggle the 'WIP' prefix in the MR title
## Why was this MR needed?
As explained in #21225, it prevents you from having to click through the entire edit form just to mark an MR as WIP.
Closes #21225
See merge request !6259
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
It toggles the 'WIP' prefix in the MR title.
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Fix broken specs after merging !6265
See merge request !6647
|
| |/ /
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fortunately, only specs needed to be fixed, so that's good!
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Fix page scrolling to top on sidebar toggle
## What does this MR do?
Prevents page from scrolling to the top when a user clicks sidebar closing hamburger icon as well as when a user is toggling sidebar pinning.
## Why was this MR needed?
When a user is closing the sidebar or pinning the sidebar the scroll position of the page should not be affected.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #22851
See merge request !6627
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Added preventDefault for toggling sidebar off as well as for pinning
and unpinning the sidebar.
Closes #22851
|
| |\ \ \
| |_|/
|/| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
into 'master'
document the need to be owner or have the master permission level for the initial push
## What does this MR do?
It documents the new behavior as discussed on gitlab-org/gitlab-ce#22543, because the `/protected_branch` URL of empty repository is not available and could mislead users.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Don't think so
## Why was this MR needed?
When you create a repository on GitLab, command line instructions on its home page for the use case _"Existing folder or Git repository"_ invite you to `git push -u origin master`, but the very first push is now rejected if you are not `Owner` or attributed `Master` permission.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
- new behavior was introduced here : gitlab-org/gitlab-ce@71dec8b1b61e9e194d242d37b39416b72020936b
- lack of documentation was discussed at gitlab-org/gitlab-ce#22543
See merge request !6608
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
initial push
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Use `fa-right-arrow` instead of `fa-check` as the current build indicator in the build sidebar for better UX.
Closes #22499
See merge request !6501
|
| | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Add link to comparison from system note, update changelog
## What does this MR do?
Adds a link to the comparison between the previous and latest version.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
## Why was this MR needed?
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] ~~[Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~
- [ ] ~~API support added~~
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #22773
See merge request !6607
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
chosen to compare against
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
in spec
|
| | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
'master'
Link to the "What requires downtime?" page from the Migration Style Guide
## What does this MR do?
Adds a link from migration style guide -> "What requires downtime?"
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
## Why was this MR needed?
The two pages really need to be read together, so having the link is helpful.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
See merge request !6636
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
[ci skip]
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Add word-wrap to issue title on issue and milestone boards
## What does this MR do?
Adds word-wrap to the issue title found on the issue board and the milestone boards
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Shouldn't be
## Why was this MR needed?
Improves UI
## Screenshots (if relevant)
Before:
After:
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #22274
See merge request !6412
|
| | | |_|_|_|/
| |/| | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
'jimmykarily/gitlab-ce-notify_current_user_when_merging_an_mr_after_build_succeeds' into 'master'
Notify current_user about automatic merge after successful build
It enables notifications to the initiator of a merge when the MR is flagged as "Merge when build succeeds".
Because when running Builds, quite some time passes between the user's
action and the actual Merge so it is a good thing to notify the
initiator of the Merge when it actually happens.
Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/14409
See merge request !6534
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Fixes: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/14409
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
'21983-member-add_user-doesn-t-detect-existing-members-that-have-requested-access' into 'master'
Resolve "`Member.add_user`doesn't detect existing members that have requested access"
## What does this MR do?
This merge request handle the case when an access requester is added to a group or project (via the members page or the API).
In `Member.add_user`, if an access requester already exists, we simply accept their request (and set the `created_by`, `access_level` and `expires_at` attributes if given).
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
I've taken the opportunity to cleanup the whole `{Group,Project}Member.add_user*` methods since it was quite a mess.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #21983
See merge request !6393
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Changes include:
- Ensure Member.add_user is not called directly when not necessary
- New GroupMember.add_users_to_group to have the same abstraction level as for Project
- Refactor Member.add_user to take a source instead of an array of members
- Fix Rubocop offenses
- Always use Project#add_user instead of project.team.add_user
- Factorize users addition as members in Member.add_users_to_source
- Make access_level a keyword argument in GroupMember.add_users_to_group and ProjectMember.add_users_to_projects
- Destroy any requester before adding them as a member
- Improve the way we handle access requesters in Member.add_user
Instead of removing the requester and creating a new member,
we now simply accepts their access request. This way, they will
receive a "access request granted" email.
- Fix error that was previously silently ignored
- Stop raising when access level is invalid in Member, let Rails validation do their work
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|_|/ / / /
|/| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
New `Members::RequestAccessService`
Part of #21979.
See merge request !6265
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|_|/ / / /
|/| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Preserve label filters when sorting
## What does this MR do?
Allows Issues that are already filtered by labels to be sorted without losing the label filters.
## Why was this MR needed?
Users don't expect to lose their label filters when sorting Issues.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #20982
See merge request !6136
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Closes #20982
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/20982
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
'AshleyDumaine/gitlab-ce-22494-wide-custom-header-logos-arent-centered' into 'master'
Center the header logo
_Originally opened at !6507 by @AshleyDumaine._
- - -
## What does this MR do?
* Centers the header logo using `relative` positioning on the svg or img in the header-logo
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
## Why was this MR needed?
The custom wide header logos aren't centered after logging in as seen in #22494
## Screenshots (if relevant)
| Before | After |
| --------- | ------ |
|  |  |
Signout (for centering comparison):
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [x] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #22494
See merge request !6610
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |/ / / / / / /
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Changed zero padded days to no padded days in date_format
## What does this MR do?
Changed zero padded days to no padded days in date_format so that calendar spec tests will pass.
Specs were failing because it was looking for `Saturday Oct 01, 2016` when it should have been looking for `Saturday Oct 1, 2016`
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
None
## Why was this MR needed?
Fixes failing test
## Screenshots (if relevant)
None
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- Tests
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #22861
See merge request !6634
|
