| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Refactor ability.rb into Policies
## What does this MR do?
Factors out `ability.rb` into a new abstraction - the "policy" (stored in `app/policies`). A policy is a class named `#{class_name}Policy` (looked up automatically as needed) that implements `rules` as follows:
``` ruby
class ThingPolicy < BasePolicy
def rules
@user # this is a user to determine abilities for, optionally nil in the anonymous case
@subject # this is the subject of the ability, guaranteed to be an instance of `Thing`
can! :some_ability # grant the :some_ability permission
cannot! :some_ability # ensure that :some_ability is not allowed. this overrides any `can!` that is called before or after
delegate! @subject.other_thing # merge the abilities (can!) and prohibitions (cannot!) from `@subject.other_thing`
can? :some_ability # test whether, so far, :some_ability is allowed
end
def anonymous_rules
# optional. if not implemented `rules` is called where `@user` is nil. otherwise this method is called when `@user` is nil.
end
end
```
See merge request !5796
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
re a conversation with @rspeicher, this spec isn't really testing
anything.
|
| | | |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Add a BroadcastMessage API
Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/21628
See merge request !6112
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Fix bug where pagination is still displayed despite all todos marked as done
## What does this MR do?
Changes the todo `mark all as done` button callback to remove pagination and add user friendly text `"You're all done!"` so that it is consistent with what the page should look like after refreshing
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Shouldn't be
## Why was this MR needed?
Resolve existing UI inconsistency
## Screenshots (if relevant)
Before:
After:
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #21048
See merge request !6113
|
| | | |/
| |/| |
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Check for existance of elements under test in application_spec.js
## What does this MR do?
Checks that the elements under test in `application_spec.js` actually exist.
## Why was this MR needed?
```
$ echo 'just garbage' > spec/javascripts/fixtures/application.html.haml
$ bundle exec teaspoon spec/javascripts/application_spec.js
2 examples, 0 failures
```
See merge request !6051
|
| | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \
| |_|_|/
|/| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Fixed escaping issue with labels filter
## What does this MR do?
Encodes label names to stop any JS errors.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #15552
See merge request !6123
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Closes #15552
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Remove redundant js-timeago-pending from user activity log
## What does this MR do?
Enables the `skip_js` feature of `time_ago_with_tooltip()` since the frontend was already re-initializing `timeago` on all the elements after it received the data from the backend.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Shouldn't be
## Why was this MR needed?
* Reduces bandwidth usage (Reduced by ~3.1kb)
* Removes redundant code
* Happy DOM :balloon:
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #21063
## Screenshots (if relevant)
Before (DOM):
After (DOM):
Before (Bandwidth):
After (Bandwidth):
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5871
|
