| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fix UTF-8 handling in incremental trace update API
## What does this MR do?
This MR fixes invalid UTF-8 handling in incremental trace update API (used by GitLab Runner).
## Why was this MR needed?
Current version is using `.length` method to determine current trace size where Runner is using the trace size in bytes. Also this byte size is used in headers and file operations to agree the trace part to send. This is a problem when build trace contains any multi-byte UTF-8 characters. This MR is fixing this situation so all parts are using the same size in bytes.
### Runner -> API communication before fix:
```
Checking for builds... received runner=_token_
gitlab-ci-multi-runner 1.3.0~beta.26.gcfd63b9 (cfd63b9) build=25 runner=_token_
Using Docker executor with image debian:jessie ... build=25 runner=_token_
Pulling docker image debian:jessie ... build=25 runner=_token_
25 Submitting build to coordinator... ok runner=_token_
25 Appending trace to coordinator... ok RemoteRange=0-158 RemoteState=running ResponseMessage=202 Accepted ResponseStatusCode=202 SentRange=0-158 runner=_token_
25 Appending trace to coordinator... ok RemoteRange=0-491 RemoteState=running ResponseMessage=202 Accepted ResponseStatusCode=202 SentRange=158-505 runner=_token_
WARNING: 25 Appending trace to coordinator... range missmatch RemoteRange=0-491 RemoteState= ResponseMessage=416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable ResponseStatusCode=416 SentRange=505-584 runner=_token_
WARNING: 25 Resending trace patch due to range missmatch runner=_token_
25 Appending trace to coordinator... ok RemoteRange=0-556 RemoteState=running ResponseMessage=202 Accepted ResponseStatusCode=202 SentRange=491-584 runner=_token_
WARNING: 25 Appending trace to coordinator... range missmatch RemoteRange=0-556 RemoteState= ResponseMessage=416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable ResponseStatusCode=416 SentRange=584-663 runner=_token_
WARNING: 25 Resending trace patch due to range missmatch runner=_token_
25 Appending trace to coordinator... ok RemoteRange=0-621 RemoteState=running ResponseMessage=202 Accepted ResponseStatusCode=202 SentRange=556-663 runner=_token_
Build succeeded build=25 runner=_token_
WARNING: 25 Appending trace to coordinator... range missmatch RemoteRange=0-621 RemoteState= ResponseMessage=416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable ResponseStatusCode=416 SentRange=663-797 runner=_token_
WARNING: 25 Resending trace patch due to range missmatch runner=_token_
25 Appending trace to coordinator... ok RemoteRange=0-741 RemoteState=running ResponseMessage=202 Accepted ResponseStatusCode=202 SentRange=621-797 runner=_token_
25 Submitting build to coordinator... ok runner=_token_
```
### Runner -> API communication after fix:
```
Checking for builds... received runner=_token_
gitlab-ci-multi-runner 1.3.0~beta.26.gcfd63b9 (cfd63b9) build=26 runner=_token_
Using Docker executor with image debian:jessie ... build=26 runner=_token_
Pulling docker image debian:jessie ... build=26 runner=_token_
26 Submitting build to coordinator... ok runner=_token_
26 Appending trace to coordinator... ok RemoteRange=0-158 RemoteState=running ResponseMessage=202 Accepted ResponseStatusCode=202 SentRange=0-158 runner=_token_
26 Appending trace to coordinator... ok RemoteRange=0-505 RemoteState=running ResponseMessage=202 Accepted ResponseStatusCode=202 SentRange=158-505 runner=_token_
26 Appending trace to coordinator... ok RemoteRange=0-584 RemoteState=running ResponseMessage=202 Accepted ResponseStatusCode=202 SentRange=505-584 runner=_token_
26 Appending trace to coordinator... ok RemoteRange=0-663 RemoteState=running ResponseMessage=202 Accepted ResponseStatusCode=202 SentRange=584-663 runner=_token_
Build succeeded build=26 runner=_token_
26 Submitting build to coordinator... ok runner=_token_
```
See merge request !4541
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
'ruianderson/gitlab-ce-option-to-allow-or-not-merge-failed-builds' into 'master'
Add option to restrict merge MR with failed build
_Originally opened at !3828 by @ruianderson._
-----
## What does this MR do?
This MR adds an option to prevent MR from being merged if their build status is not a success. Please note that if the MR has no `ci_commit`, the MR can be merged (i.e. we don't enforce builds to be configured).
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Probably the copy in the edit project's page and in the documentation.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #5940.
## Screenshots
See merge request !4503
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
#mergeable_ci_state?
The logic of the method was obviously inverted.
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
'only_allow_merge_if_build_succeeds.rb' feature
Based on the feedback from reviewers.
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| | |/
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |\ \
| |/
|/|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Don't require Gitlab::Redis in mail_room.yml if it's already defined
## What does this MR do?
Avoid requiring `lib/gitlab/redis.rb` if `Gitlab::Redis` is already defined.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
No.
## Why was this MR needed?
Because otherwise you get `already initialized constant Gitlab::Redis::XXX`, e.g.:
```
› bin/rspec spec/config/mail_room_spec.rb
Running via Spring preloader in process 24658
/Users/remy/Code/GitLab/gdk/gitlab/lib/gitlab/redis.rb:3: warning: already initialized constant Gitlab::Redis::CACHE_NAMESPACE
/Users/remy/Code/GitLab/gdk/gitlab/lib/gitlab/redis.rb:3: warning: previous definition of CACHE_NAMESPACE was here
/Users/remy/Code/GitLab/gdk/gitlab/lib/gitlab/redis.rb:4: warning: already initialized constant Gitlab::Redis::SESSION_NAMESPACE
/Users/remy/Code/GitLab/gdk/gitlab/lib/gitlab/redis.rb:4: warning: previous definition of SESSION_NAMESPACE was here
/Users/remy/Code/GitLab/gdk/gitlab/lib/gitlab/redis.rb:5: warning: already initialized constant Gitlab::Redis::SIDEKIQ_NAMESPACE
/Users/remy/Code/GitLab/gdk/gitlab/lib/gitlab/redis.rb:5: warning: previous definition of SIDEKIQ_NAMESPACE was here
/Users/remy/Code/GitLab/gdk/gitlab/lib/gitlab/redis.rb:12: warning: already initialized constant Gitlab::Redis::URL_MUTEX
/Users/remy/Code/GitLab/gdk/gitlab/lib/gitlab/redis.rb:12: warning: previous definition of URL_MUTEX was here
/Users/remy/Code/GitLab/gdk/gitlab/lib/gitlab/redis.rb:13: warning: already initialized constant Gitlab::Redis::POOL_MUTEX
/Users/remy/Code/GitLab/gdk/gitlab/lib/gitlab/redis.rb:13: warning: previous definition of POOL_MUTEX was here
2/2 |================================================= 100 =================================================>| Time: 00:00:00
Finished in 0.38505 seconds (files took 0.48292 seconds to load)
2 examples, 0 failures
```
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
None!
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] ~~[CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added~~ Not needed.
- [x] ~~[Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~ Not needed.
- [x] ~~API support added.~~ Not needed.
- [x] ~~Tests.~~ Not needed.
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !4586
|
| |/
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Add Issue/PR Templates to deter issues/contributions on the GitHub mirror of the project
## What does this MR do?
Adds GitHub-specific `ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md` and `PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md` files in a `.github` directory. To prevent new issues/PRs, I figured it'd be good to direct users/contributors to open issues/contribute code in the "correct" project.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Wording/phrasing, mostly.
## Why was this MR needed?
The GitHub issue tracker is being closed, and PRs on GitHub haven't been accepted for a while now. This was discussed briefly during the GitLab Strategy Session at the Austin Summit.
cc: @dzaporozhets @rymai @MrChrisW @dblessing @virtuacreative @amara
See merge request !4324
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
toward the GitLab.com repository.
This adds templates for Issues/Pull Requests in a `.github` directory. These only effect issues/PRs opened in the GitHub mirror of the GitLab project. As we're shutting these down, I thought it'd be good to direct users/contributors to open issues/contribute code in the "correct" project.
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Enable RuboCop for migrations
## What does this MR do?
Enable RuboCop for all files inside `db/migrate`, then add magic comments to all existing files, so that this only affects new migrations.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
This entire change is a config change and a bunch of comments.
## Why was this MR needed?
```
Yorick Peterse [11:55 AM]
I don't think we have any use case for nested def, might as well blacklist it
Sean McGivern [11:57 AM]
http://www.rubydoc.info/gems/rubocop/RuboCop/Cop/Lint/NestedMethodDefinition
Sean McGivern [11:57 AM]
hmm, it's already enabled
Sean McGivern [11:57 AM]
... because we exclude `db/` from rubocop :slightly_smiling_face:
Douwe Maan [11:57 AM]
@smcgivern: heh
Sean McGivern [11:59 AM]
I guess that's because we don't want to change the old migrations? I wonder if it's worth enabling it and adding magic comments to all the previous ones to ignore rubocop
Douwe Maan [11:59 AM]
@smcgivern: agreed
```
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
None.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
None, but if I remove the magic comment from the migration `20160416182152_convert_award_note_to_emoji_award.rb` I get:
```
$ be rubocop
Inspecting 1959 files
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................W....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Offenses:
db/migrate/20160416182152_convert_award_note_to_emoji_award.rb:3:5: W: Lint/NestedMethodDefinition: Method definitions must not be nested. Use lambda instead.
def up ...
^^^^^^
1959 files inspected, 1 offense detected
```
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- [ ] Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !4559
|
| | |/
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Migrations shouldn't fail RuboCop checks - especially lint checks, such
as the nested method check. To avoid changing code in existing
migrations, add the magic comment to the top of each of them to skip
that file.
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Wrap all rate limiting logic inside GitHub API client
## What does this MR do?
Move the actual rate limiting logic to GitHub API to clean the code inside the GitHub importer, and avoid code duplication.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
No there aren't.
## Why was this MR needed?
Avoid code duplication to handle API rate limit in every call to the GitHub API.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
There are none.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
Not relevant.
See merge request !4552
|
| | |/ |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Fix failing `EmailOnPush` spec.
Closes #18447
- This should fix CI on master
/cc @smcgivern @ayufan @stanhu @pacoguzman
See merge request !4582
|
| |/ / |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Award emoji fixes
Fixes #18357 #18325 and #18424
See merge request !4550
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
yes -> true
no -> false
. frequent -> .frequent-emojis
|
| | | | |
|
| | |\ \ |
|
| | |\ \ \
| | | |/
| | |/| |
|
| | |\ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
[ci skip]
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Properly quote table name in Rake task for MySQL and PostgreSQL compatibility
!4318 broke the gitlab:db:drop_tables functionality for PostgreSQL.
Closes #15259
See merge request !4577
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
!4318 broke the gitlab:db:drop_tables functionality for PostgreSQL.
Closes #15259
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| |/ / / / /
|/| | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Add milestone expire date to the right sidebar
## What does this MR do?
Shows milestone expire date tooltip in the sidebar. It also shows the tooltip when sidebar is collapsed.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
`common_utils.js.coffee` and `milestones_helper.rb` should be reviewed deeply.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/17355
## Screencast
See merge request !4448
|
| | |\ \ \ \ \
| | | |_|_|/
| | |/| | | |
|
| | |\ \ \ \ \
| | | |_|/ /
| | |/| | | |
|
| | |\ \ \ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
| | |\ \ \ \ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Add milestone expire date to the right sidebar.
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
It will use $.timeago behind the scene and it does the opposite of what $.timeago does.
$.timefor("Thu Jun 05 2016 23:40:39 GMT+0300 (EEST)") will return "3 days remaining".
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Checks for undefined when inserting autocomplete into textarea
## What does this MR do?
Correctly checks for undefined before inserting anything into the textarea when using autocomplete. This happens because the loading indicator tries to insert `@undefined` which we dont want to insert.
See merge request !4561
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
|
