| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
| |
page in #13937
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
added error message
Renamed file
changed error delivery
Review fixes
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fix assorted rspec failures due to stale, cached user permissions
RequestStore is disabled in tests, but the Ability class was caching user permissions based on the user and project ID of previous test runs. Revise code to use RequestStore only if it is active.
See merge request !5919
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RequestStore is disabled in tests, but the Ability class was
caching user permissions based on the user and project ID of
previous test runs. Revise code to use RequestStore only if it
is active.
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Update gitlab-shell to v3.4.0
Part of Redis Sentinel support: gitlab-org/gitlab-shell#29
See merge request !5920
|
| |/ |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Backport changes from gitlab-org/gitlab-ee!581
See merge request !5884
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
1. EE access control specs are significantly different, so this is a way
to reduce potential merge conflicts. EE and CE specs go in separate files.
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Disable “issue by email” feature until it uses a different token
Separate token being worked on in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/5914, but too late for 8.11.
See merge request !5915
|
| | | | |
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Call `set_discussion_id` again in DiffNote `before_validation` because the order is important
See merge request !5913
|
| | |/ /
| | |
| | |
| | | |
order is important
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Todos sorting dropdown
Implements #18135
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5691
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
[ci skip]
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Koding Integration
## What does this MR do?
Will provide Koding integration with GitLab services. Forked from !4914.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
I've introduced new layouts which might not be necessary, first time contributor.
## Why was this MR needed?
We're planning to ship Koding with GitLab.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
#12759 #14698
## Screenshots (if relevant)
### Screencasts
http://recordit.co/BDMbhwgxPD
http://recordit.co/By0qiz1ClC
### Enable Koding in Application Settings
### Koding Dashboard
### Set up Koding Stack
1 - 
2 - 
### Run on Koding on Project Page
### Run in IDE on Merge Requests
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5909
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Koding: #index: landing page for Koding integration
If enabled it will provide a link to open remote Koding instance url
for now we are also providing the sneak preview video for how
integration works in detail.
Repository: check whether .koding.yml file exists on repository
Projects: landing page: show Run in IDE (Koding) button if repo has stack file
Projects: MR: show Run in IDE Koding button if repo has stack file on active branch
ProjectHelpers: add_koding_stack: stack generator for provided project
With this helper we will auto-generate the required stack template
for a given project. For the feature we can request this base template
from the running Koding instance on integration.
Currently this will provide users to create a t2.nano instance on aws
and it'll automatically configures the instance for basic requirements.
Projects: empty state and landing page provide shortcuts to create stack
projects_helper: use branch on checkout and provide an entry point
This ${var.koding_queryString_branch} will be replaced with the branch
provided in query string which will allow us to use same stack template
for different branches of the same repository.
ref: https://github.com/koding/koding/pull/8597/commits/b8c0e43c4c24bf132670aa8a3cfb0d634acfd09b
projects_helper: provide sha info in query string to use existing vms
With this change we'll be able to query existing vms on Koding side
based on the commit id that they've created.
ref: https://github.com/koding/koding/pull/8597/commits/1d630fadf31963fa6ccd3bed92e526761a30a343
Integration: Docs: Koding documentation added
Disable /koding route if integration is disabled
Use application settings to enable Koding
Projects_helper: better indentation with strip_heredoc usage
Projects_helper: return koding_url as is if there is no project provided
current_settings: set koding_enabled: false by default
Koding_Controller: to render not_found once integration is disabled
Dashboard_specs: update spec for Koding enabled case
Projects_Helper: make repo dynamic
ref: https://github.com/koding/koding/pull/8597/commits/4d615242f45aaea4c4986be84ecc612b0bb1514c
Updated documentation to have right format
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|/ /
|/| | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
into 'master'
17465 Fixed dropdown cursor key navigation
## What does this MR do?
This MR fixes the use of cursor/arrow/enter key events with search dropdowns, allowing a user to navigate up and down the list with the arrow keys and then select their item with the enter key.
It also applies some *minor* scroll user experience fixes, such as resetting the selected dropdown item every time it opens/closes (also stops multiple dropdowns conflicting) and forcing the dropdown scroll to scroll right to the top or bottom depending on whether they have selected the first or last item, respectively.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
I would like someone with GitLab experience to check over whether this would harm any unique implementations of the GitLabDropdown or SearchAutocomplete.
## Why was this MR needed?
The current version has incorrectly behaving search dropdowns in the navbar, they either do not navigate using the keyboard or do not use the enter keystroke to select a highlighted item.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes #17465.
Closes #20752.
Closes #21014.
**Contributes** to #20754.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
See merge request !4781
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
the simulated clicking of a row and fixed the conflict between enter key form submit and enter key row selection
Added bootstrap dropdown event triggers to invoke the open and close methods of the dropdown, allowing for the binding of array key events
Added #17465 fix entry to CHANGELOG
Fixed multi-dropdown selected row index conflict
Fixed whitespace diff
Added padding to the dropdown content iterative scroll as well as new conditional scrolls to scroll all the way to the top when the first item of a list is selected and to scroll all the way to the bottom when the last item of a list is selected
Added conditionals to the enable and disable autocomplete methods to stop multiple invocations without any enabled/disabled state change
Fixes some incorrect firing of requests. The dropdown box was invoking a new query every time it closed and the GitLabDropdownRemote callback was invoking a new query which was causing the dropdown double render issue.
Added .selectable css class to dropdown list items that are not dividers or headers and altered selectors to account for that. Moved scroll padding Number to variable.
Removed unused method
Started Dropdown tests
Added fixture and began first test
Almost finished, navigation done, action and close needed
YAY. TESTS DONE.
Altered test and fixed click
started removing selectable class use
Fixed as reviewed
altered selection method
Fixed autocomplete shutting dropdown on arrow key use
patched XSS vulns
updated tests
f
Added click fixes
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Make all future skipped builds as processable when retrying a build
## What does this MR do?
Makes a builds that are marked as skipped when a pipeline is processed to be reprocessed by changing their's state to created.
## Why was this MR needed?
Currently retry is broken. When you retry a build of pipeline it will succeed and be marked as succeeded, when the next stages should be triggered.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/21066
See merge request !5879
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
'21010-emailsonpushworker-incorrectly-claims-deleted-a-commit-after-a-push' into 'master'
Resolve "EmailsOnPushWorker incorrectly claims deleted a commit after a push"
## What does this MR do?
Fix the comparison order in the emails on push worker, so regular pushes don't show a message about force pushing.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Don't think so, it was just a typo: `after_sha` should map to the `source_branch` argument, because it's the head of the comparison.
## Why was this MR needed?
To fix a regression!
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #21010.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] ~~[CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added~~
- [x] ~~[Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~
- [x] ~~API support added~~
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5894
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
