| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix Safari displaying NaN for selected due date
## What does this MR do?
1. Stops using `Date.parse` to parse selected due dates.
2. Refactors DueDateSelectors to be more maintainable and readable
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
**To review the actual fix, look here:** https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/4ad43ac3a12902d7ea01dc09f8a361b01c21a0ee. It would be difficult to pick out from the overall diff.
## Why was this MR needed?
In Safari, the due date selector was displaying 'NaN' when a date is selected, which was being returned by `Date.parse`. Because `Date.parse` is implemented differently across browsers it's generally recommended to favor implicit Date parsing with the `Date` constructor. For more background on this, [see MDN on Date.parse](https://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Date/parse).
Also, the code for DueDateSelector was pretty messy, and its logic was very tightly coupled, so I refactored it. None of the basic logic changed, I just broke it up into smaller pieces and made it more OO.
Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22984
See merge request !6797
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix broken rspec in compare text
!6910 changed the filter text from "Filter by branch/tag" to "Filter by Git revision"
See merge request !6926
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix 500 error when creating mileston from group page
Part of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23378
See merge request !6920
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix broken Spinach tests caused by changes in !6550
!6550 added dropdowns for the branch "from" and "to" fields, but these Spinach tests were not updated accordingly.
Partial fix to #23378
See merge request !6910
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
'master'
Handle case where deployment ref no longer exists
## What does this MR do?
In 8.9, we didn't create keep-around refs for deployments. So it's possible that someone created a deployment (say, for testing), and then deleted the branch and all other references to that commit. That commit could then get GCed, and trying to view MRs on 8.11+ will show a 500. See https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22655#note_16575020 for more details.
## Why was this MR needed?
If someone created a deployment on 8.9, then deleted all references to the commit for that deployment, we will throw an exception when checking if the deployment includes a commit.
Closes #22655.
See merge request !6855
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Loads GFM once for per page
## What does this MR do?
Currently the GFM init code is included every time there is a GFM form on the page. This changes that & only includes in once if any number of GFM forms are on the page.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
#22827
See merge request !6840
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
'23234-deleting-a-milestone-removes-source-branch-deletion-options-of-associated-merge-requests' into 'master'
Maintain "force_remove_source_branch" options on Merge Request unless specified
Fixes a problem where Merge Requests were losing the state associated with the flag to remove the source branch upon merge
* Closes #23234
* Closes #23191
* Closes #19351
See merge request !6817
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix JS bug with select2 because of missing `data-field` attribute in select box.
Fixes #23193
See merge request !6812
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Prevent flash alert text from being obscured when container is fluid
Fixes [a regression](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/a2af7790) that causes the text within server-initiated flash *alerts* (not flash *notices*) to be obscured when `.container-fluid` is applied. It was reported in relation to a cherry-picking flash alert, but the problem occurs with all server-initiated flash alerts contained by a fluid container.
Note that as part of this fix, I combined some duplicate code and removed `.flash-text` & `.content-wrapper` selectors as they didn't seem to be necessary.
I manually tested JS-initiated Flash alerts to make sure this doesn't affect their appearance. I also grepped around for anything else that might depend on these styles. Everything checked out. But... can *you* see something this is going to break?
Affected users can't read flash alerts.
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22915
See merge request !6694
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Use forked github-markup gem to enable python3 support with omnibus
Changes the version of `github-markup` gem we are using, to be the forked one with the changes to enable python3 support.
The change is backward compatible with users using Python 2, and will only be running with Python 3 in Omnibus (with the help of a custom patch we apply there).
Make sure backward compatibility isn't broken for source installs.
You need to make sure you pickup into stable this merge request as well (for omnibus): https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/omnibus-gitlab/merge_requests/1015 as it's part of the fix, otherwise package will fail to build.
We had some regressions with .rst rendering that were fixed, but still some issues with encoding persisted (this MR will fix that). See: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/21696
* gitlab-org/gitlab-ce#21696
* gitlab-org/gitlab-ce#22748
* gitlab-com/support-forum#1097
See merge request !6659
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes long commit messages overflow viewport in file tree
## What does this MR do?
Fixes long commit messages breaking the table.
It adds back a max-width in `pixels` instead of `%`.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
No.
## Why was this MR needed?
To fix the overflow of the commit message
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes #22544
See merge request !6573
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Prevent running GfmAutocomplete setup for each diff note
## What does this MR do?
Debounces GfmAutoComplete.setup.
## Why was this MR needed?
See https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22704
Major lag on MR screens with many diff notes.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22704
See merge request !6569
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |
|
|
| |
[ci skip]
|
| |
|
|
| |
[ci skip]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add CHANGELOG entry for 8.12.6
See merge request !6816
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fix #23230: Update mailroom to 0.8.1 in Gemfile.lock
## What does this MR do?
Update mailroom to 0.8.1 in Gemfile.lock
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
## Why was this MR needed?
8.12.5 introduced a bug which put 2 different versions of mail_room in Gemfile.lock, probably due to a merge error.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
#23230
Closes #23230
See merge request !6814
|
| |/ |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
API: Share projects only with groups current_user can access
Aims to address the issues here: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23004
* Projects can be shared with non-existent groups
* Projects can be shared with groups that the current user does not have access to read
Concerns:
The new implementation of the API endpoint allows projects to be shared with a larger range of groups than can be done via the web UI.
The form for sharing a project with a group uses the following API endpoint to index the available groups: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/494269fc92f61098ee6bd635a0426129ce2c5456/lib/api/groups.rb#L17. The groups indexed in the web form will only be those groups that the user is currently a member of.
The new implementation allows projects to be shared with any group that the authenticated user has access to view. This widens the range of groups to those that are public and internal.
See merge request !2005
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Don't send Private-Token headers to Sentry
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22537
This bumps 'raven' (the Ruby gem we use to send errors to Sentry) to
version 2.0.2. We need 2.0.0 or newer to be able to sanitize HTTP
headers.
See merge request !2004
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
'master'
Add a new gitlab:users:clear_all_authentication_tokens task
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Part of #22537.
See merge request !6745
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Update mail_room gem
## What does this MR do?
Upgrades the mail_room gem from 0.8.0 to 0.8.1.
## Why was this MR needed?
mail_room throws an exception if the watching script joins a undefined thread. Release 0.8.1 adds a check to ensure that the thread exists before calling join.
Fixes gitlab-org/omnibus-gitlab#1619.
See merge request !6714
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Improve issue load time performance by avoiding ORDER BY in find_by call
See merge request !6724
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Resolve "NameError: undefined local variable or method `request' for #<Grape::Middleware::Error:0x007fc990..."
## What does this MR do?
Switches from `request` to `env` in an API helper method as the helpers are included in contexts lacking `request`.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
I couldn't build a reproducer for this.
Closes #22820
See merge request !6615
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |\ |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fix issues importing services via Import/Export
Prevents errors when initialising services that do not have any properties set yet - case that could happen when importing projects.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22891
See merge request !6667
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fix export project file permissions issue
Fixes security concerns of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22757
I have just added the permissions 0700 to the creation of any of the export paths, as @jacobvosmaer suggested in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22757#note_16197616
After this has fixed, it could take up to 24 hours in the worse case scenario for old archives to be completely safe - This is the time `ImportExportProjectCleanupWorker` may take to remove the folders. The temporary folders will be 0700 straight away for new installations.
See merge request !2003
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Prevent claiming associated model IDs via import
On the import side, we should be careful not to use any IDs as part of the JSON file that could have been manipulated.
Part of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/20821
Things we already do (__before__ this fix):
1. Remove all primary keys
1. **Always** reassign some of the foreign keys, such as ALL project IDs and user IDs (so it would be difficult to impersonate or try to gain access to another project)
1. Ignore/reject attributes that do not exist in the model
1. If someone reassigns a foreign key `submodel_id`, and that object has another json as the submodel, the new submodel will reassign the `submodel_id` to the newly created submodel ID.
Things we should do:
1. Remove/nullify any other foreign keys that we don't reassign (checked this, and there aren't many, fortunately. In fact, I don't think much harm can be done at all - at the moment).
See merge request !1985
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fix project deletion when feature visibility is set to private
Projects that are destroyed are put in the pending_delete state.
The ProjectDestroyWorker checks whether the current user has
access, but since the ProjectFeature class uses the default scope
of the Project, it will not be able to find the right project.
This was a regression in 8.12 that caused the following stack trace:
```
NoMethodError: undefined method `team' for nil:NilClass
from app/models/project_feature.rb:62:in `get_permission'
from app/models/project_feature.rb:34:in `feature_available?'
from app/models/project.rb:21:in `feature_available?'
from app/policies/project_policy.rb:170:in `disabled_features!'
from app/policies/project_policy.rb:29:in `rules'
from app/policies/base_policy.rb:82:in `block in abilities'
from app/policies/base_policy.rb:113:in `collect_rules'
from app/policies/base_policy.rb:82:in `abilities'
from app/policies/base_policy.rb:50:in `abilities'
from app/models/ability.rb:64:in `uncached_allowed'
from app/models/ability.rb:58:in `allowed'
from app/models/ability.rb:49:in `allowed?'
from app/services/base_service.rb:11:in `can?'
from lib/gitlab/metrics/instrumentation.rb:155:in `block in can?'
from lib/gitlab/metrics/method_call.rb:23:in `measure'
from lib/gitlab/metrics/instrumentation.rb:155:in `can?'
from app/services/projects/destroy_service.rb:18:in `execute'
```
Closes #22948
See merge request !6688
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Restrict failed login attempts from users with 2FA enabled.
Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/19799.
See merge request !6668
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Skip wiki creation when GitHub project has wiki enabled
## What does this MR do?
When importing a repository from if the repository has wiki, we should not create the default wiki. Otherwise the GitHub importer will fail because the wiki repository already exist. This bug was introduced here https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/892dea67717c0efbd6a28f7639f34535ec0a8747
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
No.
## Why was this MR needed?
GitLab fails to import GitHub Wiki.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [X] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [X] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [X] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [X] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [X] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes #22225
See merge request !6665
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fix lint-doc error
## What does this MR do?
Removes duplicate changelog versions to fix lint-doc error (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/builds/4621603)
See merge request !6623
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fix bug when trying to cache closed issues from external issue trackers
fixes #22446
See merge request !6619
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fix race condition on LFS Token
## What does this MR do?
Fixes a race condition that can be triggered if the token expires right after we retrieve it, but before we can set the new expiry time.
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/6551#note_16190569
Thanks for catching this so quickly @jacobvosmaer-gitlab
cc @DouweM
See merge request !6592
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
into 'master'
Changed compare dropdowns to dropdowns with search input
## What does this MR do?
This changes the compare dropdowns from text inputs, that when clicked, open a dropdown of branches/tags to dropdowns that have a dropdown toggle and an isolated search input.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
## Why was this MR needed?
This was needed to fix the poor UX highlighted in #22221, where opening the dropdown showed an initially filtered set of results because the dropdown toggle was the dropdown filter itself. The compare page is always loaded with `master` as each branch/tag selection, so when opening the dropdown, it would only show results matching `master`.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #22221
See merge request !6550
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fix build sidebar build details padding
## What does this MR do?
Removes a `.block-first` overriding declaration that was added to fix the coverage padding and moved the padding that fixes the coverage block to a `.block.coverage` declaration.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
## Why was this MR needed?
The build sidebar build details had too much padding as seen in #22529.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #22529
See merge request !6506
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix tooltip text when Copy to cliboard is clicked
## What does this MR do?
Fixes #22022 to change tooltip text to "Copied!" when the "Copy to clipboard" button is clicked.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Line 29 in app/assets/javascripts/copy_to_clipboard.js
## Why was this MR needed?
There was a regression that prevents tooltip change on button click for Copy to clipboard.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] API support added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #22022
See merge request !6294
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |\ |
|
| | | |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Bump Gitlab Shell to support low IO priority for storage moves
## What does this MR do?
Bump Gitlab Shell to support low IO priority for storage moves
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
No
## Why was this MR needed?
We need this shell enhancement to continue to move projects in production
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/infrastructure/issues/443
See merge request !6525
|
| |/ / |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Pass the full project path for resolve buttons
## What does this MR do?
The full project path is passed from the HTML into the JS rather than the resolve button JS generating the URL based on the the namespaces.
@smcgivern @stanhu Do we have anyway of adding tests for installs with relative URLs?
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #21704
See merge request !6129
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
into 'master'
Fixed awards dropdown search text from repeating
## What does this MR do?
Thanks @zeiv for this!
>This fixes #20463 by adding the .emoji-search class to the "Search results" h5 element. AwardsHandler.prototype.setupSearch() was trying to remove the element before creating a new one, but wasn't because the it was attempting to select it with the .emoji-search class, which wasn't being added.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
>I don't believe so.
## Why was this MR needed?
>See #20463
_(and #22525)_
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #22525
See merge request !6498
|
