| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Added copy file path button to diffs
## What does this MR do?
Adds a copy file path button in the header of diff files.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #23108
See merge request !6769
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Closes #23108
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Remove redundant mixins
## What does this MR do?
Removes the following redundant mixins
```
@mixin box-shadow($shadow) {
box-shadow: $shadow;
}
@mixin border-radius($radius) {
border-radius: $radius;
}
```
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Just need to make sure the refactor didn't break anything. Last time I did something like this, we faced an edge case where values `.5` would pass correctly in mixins but not when passed directly to the property.
## Why was this MR needed?
* Reduces redundant code which leads to happier developers :smile:
## Screenshots (if relevant)
None
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #22012
See merge request !6287
|
| | | | |
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
'master'
Changes to make Git basics more intuitive
From https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/6420
See merge request !6777
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
- updated verbiage where appropriate
- changed "git config" commands to include quotes for variables to be more in line with standard practive and to avoid issues with spaces
- updated CHANGELOG as part of commit
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |/ / / |
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Correct namespace validation to forbid bad names #21077
## What does this MR do?
Updates master namespace regex to forbid any namespace ending in `.git` or `.atom` and corrects and adds relevant tests
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
I think it's all good. I could use help with the creation of tests for usernames with trailing `.atom` or `.git` as the testing framework is a bit over my head.
## Why was this MR needed?
A group that ends in `.atom` will cause the relevent dashboard to crash if the user (ANY user, not just the creator) has visibility of the group until it is deleted through the admin panel (it cannot be renamed, the edit page will crash. It may be fixable through the API, that wasn't checked.)
This allows a malicious user with group creation privileges to bulk add users to a group, rename the group to a bad name, and crash the groups dashboard for all members of the group. The same applies if the group is internal or public and users navigate to the explore tab of the groups dashboard.
The same applies to usernames ending in `.atom`.
In many places of the code, it implies that `.git` in not allowed at the end of namespaces, but many allowed it anyway. This MR forbids it everywhere to prevent potential issues (like the one with `.atom` going forward).
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Group path validation incomplete, crashes groups dashboard #21077
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [X] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [X] Added for this feature/bug
- [X] All builds are passing
- [X] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [X] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [X] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5994
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Adds .git and .atom to the master namespace regex
Updates existing group tests and adds two new ones
Updates path cleaning to also forbid .atom
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Fix a typo in doc/api/labels.md
See merge request !6760
|
| | | |_|/
| |/| | |
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Prevent running GfmAutocomplete setup for each diff note
## What does this MR do?
Debounces GfmAutoComplete.setup.
## Why was this MR needed?
See https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22704
Major lag on MR screens with many diff notes.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22704
See merge request !6569
|
| | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Make searching for commits case insensitive.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes #21800
See merge request !6715
|
| | | |/ / /
| |/| | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Fixes #21800.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Update Gitlab Shell to fix errors moving projects between storages
## What does this MR do?
Update Gitlab Shell to fix errors moving projects between storages
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
No
## Why was this MR needed?
We are unable to move projects using `ionice` because of an error in the current version of gitlab-shell. This brings the changes of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/merge_requests/96 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/merge_requests/97
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Related to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/infrastructure/issues/513
See merge request !6751
|
| | | |_|/ /
| |/| | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
reword title for issues_controller#show and issues_controller#edit
Closes #21712
See merge request !6503
|
| | | |/ / /
| |/| | | |
|
| |/ / / /
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Stop the global search form's default "action" from fighting with
dropdown items when using the keyboard to navigate the dropdown.
`e.preventDefault()` is now called on the enter key when a dropdown item
is already selected.
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |\ \ \ \
| |/ / /
|/| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
'master'
Truncate long labels with ellipsis in labels page
## What does this MR do?
Fixes #22953, where long labels overlaps into the description field in the labels page. Truncates long labels with ellipsis. Labels that fit are unaffected.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
No
## Why was this MR needed?
Fixes #22953.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
Existing behavior:
With the change:
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #22953
See merge request !6725
|
| | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
ExpireBuildArtifactsWorker query builds table without ordering enqueuing one job…
See merge request !6732
|
| | | |_|/
| |/| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
job per build to cleanup
We use Sidekiq::Client.push_bulk to avoid Redis round trips
|
| |\ \ \ \
| |_|_|/
|/| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Resolve "Retouch environments list and deployments list"
## What does this MR do?
#### Environments List
- Fixes deployment ID
- Removes bold styling from deployment ID
- Changes Las Deployment Column to have '#ID by user'
- Adds build column with link to the build
- Adds external url to where the environment is hosted
#### Environment Details
- Add link to the build column and changes content to show "build (#id) by user"
- Adds external link to the review app
Adds tests
## Screenshots (if relevant)
#### Environments List
#### Environments Details
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #22774
See merge request !6691
|
| | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Memoize Github::Shell's secret token
## What does this MR do?
`API::Helpers#secret_token` was reading the secret file on every invocation. This MR reads the file in the `gitlab_shell_secret_token.rb` initializer and saves it as a class variable at `Gitlab::Shell.secret_token`
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
- I'm not sure if the use of `cattr_accessor` is the best approach, or if should be moved into the `class << self` block?
- Should `API::Helpers#secret_token` be removed in favor of using `Gitlab::Shell.secret_token`?
## Why was this MR needed?
Performance optimization.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22510
See merge request !6599
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
every request.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Add visible projects API
## What does this MR do?
Add a new `/projects/visible` API endpoint. Originally created by @ben.boeckel in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/5970.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Does the API make sense?
## Why was this MR needed?
The `/projects` endpoint only returned projects the user was explicitly a member of.
Closes #19361, #3119.
See merge request !6681
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
FIxes #19361, #3119.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|_|/ /
|/| | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Cache rendered Markdown fields in the database
## What does this MR do?
Introduces cache fields for Markdown-containing fields in the database, and populates them.
## Why was this MR needed?
Rendering Markdown into HTML is performance-intensive. A Redis cache already exists, but this approach is expected to be more performant and reduce unnecessary cache invalidations.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #18337
See merge request !6095
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| |/ / / / /
|/| | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Add tooltip to project fork count
## What does this MR do?
Adds a tooltip reading `Forks` when a user hovers over the count of project forks.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
## Why was this MR needed?
Requested in #23066
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
#23066
See merge request !6718
|
| | | |/ / /
| |/| | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Fix inconsistent highlighting of already selected activity nav-links
## What does this MR do?
* Remove edge case where user could deselect an activity nav-link (which seems to be returning all the events)
* Explicitly add an `All` tab to return all the events
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Shouldn't be
## Why was this MR needed?
Resolves existing UI inconsistency
## Screenshots (if relevant)
Before:
After:
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
* Closes #21631
* Closes #21452
See merge request !6091
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Move user#show and group#show routing under root url
## What does this MR do?
Changes routing so user#show and group#show routing is under root url
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
no
## Why was this MR needed?
For nice and consistent routing for user/group show pages:
| before | after|
|---|---|
| `/u/dzaporozhets` | `/dzaporozhets`|
| `/dzaporozhets/gitlab-ce` |`/dzaporozhets/gitlab-ce`|
| `/u/dzaporozhets/snippets` |`/u/dzaporozhets/snippets`|
| `/groups/gitlab-org`| `/gitlab-org`|
| `/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce`| `/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce`|
| `/groups/gitlab-org/issues `| `/groups/gitlab-org/issues `|
So show page for user and group shown as `/:name` which is much nicer than before. At same time all nested pages like group issues stays under REST `/groups/:name/issues` so we don't need to introduce extra name restrictions ( ex. case when group has project with name "issues")
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] ~~[Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~
- [ ] ~~API support added~~
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/3620
See merge request !6686
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Improve issue load time performance by avoiding ORDER BY in find_by call
See merge request !6724
|
| | | |_|_|_|_|/
| |/| | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
The Sortable concern has a default scope that adds ORDER BY to all
queries. EXPLAIN ANALYZE shows that this additional ORDER BY statement
causes the SQL optimizer to use the wrong index, which leads to a load
time of 2.9 s vs 0.073 ms just for the SELECT call. The minimal
change here is to re-implement find_by using where and reorder to
remove the ORDER BY clause in IssuesController#index.
Closes #23075
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |/ / / / / /
|/| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Replace bootstrap caret with fontawesome caret
## What does this MR do?
1. Replaces all occurrences of `.caret` with fontawesome's caret (`fa-caret-down` for most cases)
2. Remove `.caret` from CSS
3. Refactored pipeline graph toggle to display the correct fontawesome caret (Had to change some JavaScript for this)
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
* Need to check if I missed any pages :disappointed_relieved: or for any side effects
## Why was this MR needed?
Resolves UI inconsistency
## Screenshots (if relevant)
Before (1 example out of many):
After:
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #21169
See merge request !6314
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|/ / / / /
|/| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Only hide deploy status external link on x-small screens.
## What does this MR do?
Fixes [a regression](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/03ea01946524a74773b24430c81804c2724b84b6#68dead621eaa630b5150a4d71b59fa3cd19030fd_57_50) where the deploy status widget hides only the text within the widget, and only for screens within bootstrap's 'small' range (≥544px - <768px).
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
I changed the viewport width range to hide the widget from `sm` to `xs` because when the external link is removed, it seems to fit comfortably even on xs viewports.
Given that we were already hiding the external link (along with all of the deploy text) on `sm` viewports, I assume it's okay to hide the external link still, instead of wrapping it to a new line.
We could remove the conditional hiding altogether though, and allow the external link to wrap. Definitely doesn't look as nice, but if it's important to show the external link along with the deploy status, we could make it look better when it wraps.
## Why was this MR needed?
Looked buggy, and prevented context being given for build passed icon on smaller screens.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
Before:
After:
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22778
cc: @jschatz1
See merge request !6633
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
| | |_|_|/ / /
|/| | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Issue boards new issue form
## What does this MR do?
Adds a new issue form into the issue boards lists.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Part of #21219
See merge request !6653
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
