| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Improve pipeline processing
## What does this MR do?
This works on top of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/5295 trying to solve some edge cases introduced by that Merge Request. The fix switches to a state machine which is already a part of `Ci::Pipeline` and uses events with conditional transitions to switch between pipeline states.
This is approach is much more bullet proof and much easier to understand than a previous one where we were calling a `reload_status!` which manually updated `status`. Previous approach become confusing and prone to number of errors.
## Why was this MR needed?
This improves changes introduced by https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/5295
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
None, yet.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
Not needed.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added (not needed since changelog for https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/5295 is already introduced)
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] API support added (not needed)
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug (most of tests do cover the triggering of Pipeline)
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5782
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |\ |
|
| | |\ \ |
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
`reload_status!` call
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \
| |_|_|/
|/| | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Remove unused SpamReport model; this was renamed to SpamLog
See merge request !5778
|
| | | | | |
|
| | |_|/
|/| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
update CHANGELOG
add auto-completion into pipeline
add auto-completion into pipeline
add auto-completion into pipeline
update changelog
modify tests
remove empty lines
add auto-completion into pipeline
update changelog
modify tests
switch text_field_tag into text_field
add test to new field
switch context into describe
Update CHANGELOG
render only commit title
update CHANGELOG
add auto-completion into pipeline
add auto-completion into pipeline
add auto-completion into pipeline
update changelog
modify tests
remove empty lines
add auto-completion into pipeline
update changelog
modify tests
update changelog
Update CHANGELOG
add indetation
add tests to pipeline ref
change file name for tests
change file name for spec tests
remove empty line
rename test it
rename test name
removing unexpected changes
removing unexpected changes2
update changelog
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Merge request link after pushing
## What does this MR do?
Add API to generate new merge request urls if it is a new branch. The API will be called by gitlab-shell
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
#18266
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] API support added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5542
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
DRY code + fix rubocop
Add more test cases
Append to changelog
DRY changes list
find_url service for merge_requests
use GET for getting merge request links
remove files
rename to get_url_service
reduce loop
add test case for cross project
refactor tiny thing
update changelog
|
| |\ \ \ \
| |/ / /
|/| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Show member roles to all users on members page
Closes #20614 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/850
See merge request !5776
|
| | | |/
| |/| |
|
| |\ \ \
| |/ /
|/| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Rename `markdown_preview` routes to `preview_markdown`
_Originally opened at !3700 by @cbartz._
Closes #15000.
See merge request !5774
|
| | | | |
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Remove Grack::Auth: part 2 (LFS)
Deprecate Grack::Auth and handle LFS in Rails controllers under the Project namespace.
Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/14501
See merge request !5369
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | |\ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
remove-grack-lfs
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|/ /
|/| | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Refactor pipeline creation service
## What does this MR do?
This refactors GitLab CI build processing: all builds for pipeline are pre-created when a pipeline object is created.
The builds are created with a new introduced status `created`.
The builds are then automatically promoted to `pending` when a previous stage do succeed.
This significantly simplifies pipeline processing code solving a lot of problems of lazily initialisation of previous approach (builds were created on-demand).
## Why was this MR needed?
The previous mechanism had a lot of flows (shown in related issues) in how it work, but also in code design. Removing cross model-service-library dependencies.
The current approach moves a build creation to single place `CreatePipelineService` and removes a dynamic dependency on `config_processor` significantly simplifying a build creation and pipeline processing. Pipeline processing is implemented in `ProcessPipelineService`.
This also allows to easily extend GitLab with Manual Actions which is part of 8.10 direction issue.
## Migration problem
~~This MR removes the a on-demand creation of builds in pipelines.
Pipelines that are running and are in mid-stage (some stages started, but not all) will not be fully evaluated after application restart.
This happens, because the code responsible for on-demand creation is removed.
There's no easy way to migrate existing pipelines, other than doing offline migration and putting pipeline processing in migration code (which seems to be a really bad idea).~~
To support old pipelines I added a lazy initialization of builds if none is found.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/12839
Solves: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/18644 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ci-multi-runner/issues/289
Allows to easily implement: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/17010
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] API support added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5295
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
This change simplifies a Pipeline processing by introducing a special new status: created.
This status is used for all builds that are created for a pipeline.
We are then processing next stages and queueing some of the builds (created -> pending) or skipping them (created -> skipped).
This makes it possible to simplify and solve a few ordering problems with how previously builds were scheduled.
This also allows us to visualise a full pipeline (with created builds).
This also removes an after_touch used for updating a pipeline state parameters.
Right now in various places we explicitly call a reload_status! on pipeline to force it to be updated and saved.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
'master'
Add group members API endpoints to request access and approve requests
## What does this MR do?
Add group members API endpoints to request access and approve requests.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
I chose to factorize the group/project members API as well as the new group/project access requests API.
I initially also created new services to centralize the permission checks related to actions on members, but this was out of scope and this MR is already quite big so I opened a temp MR at !5566 based on this one.
## Why was this MR needed?
To finish the "request access" feature.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #18583.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] API support added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !4833
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Also, mutualize AccessRequests and Members endpoints for Group &
Project.
New API documentation for the AccessRequests endpoints.
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|/ / / /
|/| | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Replace the tinder gem by bare HTTP requests
## What does this MR do?
It removes the `tinder` gem (used to talk to the Campfire API) and replaces its use by bare HTTP requests.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
N/A.
## Why was this MR needed?
To simplify the potential dependency hell discussed in #13333.
The initial issue was about updating `http_parser.rb` which was required by `twitter-stream` which was required by `tinder`.
Those 3 gems are not needed anymore.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
#13333
## Screenshots (if relevant)
N/A.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
Closes #13333
See merge request !5758
|
| | | |_|/ /
| |/| | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|_|/
|/| | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Fix branches page dropdown sort initial state
## What does this MR do?
Add 'Name' as the initial state for the branches dropdown filter
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Shouldn't be
## Why was this MR needed?
Prevent dropdown from being rendered without an initial state
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #20753
## Screenshots (if relevant)
Before:
After:
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5761
|
| | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Fix awardable button mutuality loading spinners
## What does this MR do?
Removes the showing and hiding of loading spinners when an awardable's opposite button is selected.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Shouldn't be
## Why was this MR needed?
Makes the UI more consistent. Reduces confusion of why another button is showing the loading spinner when it was not clicked on.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #18380
## Screenshots (if relevant)
Before:
After:
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5745
|
| | | |/ / /
| |/| | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Remove two simple instances of inline JavaScript.
Not very complicated, they're moved to the dispatcher.
See merge request !5513
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|_|/ /
|/| | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Avoid commit lookup on diff_helper
See merge request !5756
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Store OTP secret key in secrets.yml
## What does this MR do?
Migrate the value of `.secret` to `config/secrets.yml` if present, so that `.secret` can be rotated without preventing all users with 2FA from logging in. (On a clean setup, generate different keys for each.)
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
I'm not sure we actually need `.secret` at all after this, but it seems safer not to touch it.
## Why was this MR needed?
We have some DB encryption keys in `config/secrets.yml`, and one in `.secret`. They should all be in the same place.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
#3963, which isn't closed until I make the relevant changes in Omnibus too.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- ~~API support added~~
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5274
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
.secret stores the secret token used for both encrypting login cookies
and for encrypting stored OTP secrets. We can't rotate this, because
that would invalidate all existing OTP secrets.
If the secret token is present in the .secret file or an environment
variable, save it as otp_key_base in secrets.yml. Now .secret can be
rotated without invalidating OTP secrets.
If the secret token isn't present (initial setup), then just generate a
separate otp_key_base and save in secrets.yml.
Update the docs to reflect that secrets.yml needs to be retained past
upgrades, but .secret doesn't.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Clean up project destruction
Instead of redirecting from the project service to the service and back to the model, put all destruction code in the service. Also removes a possible source of failure where run_after_commit may not destroy the project.
See merge request !5695
|
| | | |_|_|_|/ /
| |/| | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Instead of redirecting from the project service to the service and back to the model,
put all destruction code in the service. Also removes a possible source of failure
where run_after_commit may not destroy the project.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |/ / / / / /
|/| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Use badge image template instead of using separate images
## What does this MR do?
Makes it possible to use template for badge instead of having multiple files.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
We also have a deprecated badge in `controllers/ci/projects_controller.rb`. We decided to leave it until 9.0, so we still have images in `public/ci/` until 9.0.
## Why was this MR needed?
We are going to implement build coverage badge, and we do not want to store 101 SVG images for each percentage value.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
#3714
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [ ] ~~[CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added~~ (refactoring)
- [ ] ~~[Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~
- [ ] ~~API support added~~
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] ~~[Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)~~ (refactoring)
See merge request !5520
|
