| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Only hide deploy status external link on x-small screens.
## What does this MR do?
Fixes [a regression](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/03ea01946524a74773b24430c81804c2724b84b6#68dead621eaa630b5150a4d71b59fa3cd19030fd_57_50) where the deploy status widget hides only the text within the widget, and only for screens within bootstrap's 'small' range (≥544px - <768px).
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
I changed the viewport width range to hide the widget from `sm` to `xs` because when the external link is removed, it seems to fit comfortably even on xs viewports.
Given that we were already hiding the external link (along with all of the deploy text) on `sm` viewports, I assume it's okay to hide the external link still, instead of wrapping it to a new line.
We could remove the conditional hiding altogether though, and allow the external link to wrap. Definitely doesn't look as nice, but if it's important to show the external link along with the deploy status, we could make it look better when it wraps.
## Why was this MR needed?
Looked buggy, and prevented context being given for build passed icon on smaller screens.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
Before:
![57efae92cd57c192075546](/uploads/22b278756de4ca6ab3949a4a9692994e/57efae92cd57c192075546.gif)
After:
![57efaeb41b211194979047](/uploads/b178ddfbbdcfe74d2ce9f52e989a6878/57efaeb41b211194979047.gif)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22778
cc: @jschatz1
See merge request !6633
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Issue boards new issue form
## What does this MR do?
Adds a new issue form into the issue boards lists.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
![Screen_Shot_2016-10-03_at_14.57.30](/uploads/17fe6cd37bd020a2ee1688e0b496c18f/Screen_Shot_2016-10-03_at_14.57.30.png)
![Screen_Shot_2016-10-03_at_14.57.32](/uploads/c3f12bcb9ff9a0e7ce5b0bb06dfb0dd7/Screen_Shot_2016-10-03_at_14.57.32.png)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Part of #21219
See merge request !6653
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Added validation so the user shouldnt be able to submit the form without the title present
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Stop issue being dragged if it doesn't have an ID
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
This is because contributors can't create issues with labels
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Changed how the data is passed into Vue resource
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Added for attribute to title label
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
This was causing issues with moving from the done list
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Fixed issue when dragging cards
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Closes #21219
|
|\ \ \
| |_|/
|/| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Revert "Label list shows all issues (opened or closed) with that label"
## What does this MR do?
Revert changes made on https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/5991. Reasoning here: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/21691#note_16516861
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [X] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [X] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- Tests
- [X] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [X] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [X] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [X] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #21691
See merge request !6695
|
| | | |
|
|\ \ \
| |/ /
|/| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
MergeRequest new form load diff asynchronously
## What does this MR do?
Don't return diff tab content from the server when request for a new merge request
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
## Why was this MR needed?
To avoid 502 errors due to this controller action takes to much time
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Relates #13912
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- ~~[ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~
- ~~[ ] API support added~~
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5844
|
| |/ |
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | | |
See !6096.
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
add docs and tests - add additional validation
allow move without content
updated response
|
|\ \ \
| |_|/
|/| |
| | | |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| | | |
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Improve asynchronous pipeline processing
## What does this MR do?
This MR improves asynchronous processing of pipeline.
## Why was this MR needed?
It eliminates some race conditions and improves performance.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
## What are the relevant issue / merge request numbers?
Related merge request: !6410
Extracted from !6411
See merge request !6650
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Conflicts:
app/models/ci/pipeline.rb
app/models/commit_status.rb
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
|\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Escape HTML nodes in builds commands in ci linter
This MR removes call to `simple_format` that behaves like `String#html_safe`, thus it passes unescaped HTML tags to the view.
Closes #22541
See merge request !2001
|
| | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
API: disable rails session auth for non-GET/HEAD requests
Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22435
See merge request !1999
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | |/ / / /
| |/| | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Projects::ForkService delegates to this service almost entirely, but needed
one small change so it would propagate create errors correctly.
CreateService#execute needs significant refactoring; it is now right at the
complexity limit set by Rubocop. I avoided doing so in this commit to keep the
diff as small as possible.
Several tests depend on the insecure behaviour of ForkService, so fi them up at
the same time.
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Prevent flash alert text from being obscured when container is fluid
## What does this MR do?
Fixes [a regression](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/a2af7790) that causes the text within server-initiated flash *alerts* (not flash *notices*) to be obscured when `.container-fluid` is applied. It was reported in relation to a cherry-picking flash alert, but the problem occurs with all server-initiated flash alerts contained by a fluid container.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Note that as part of this fix, I combined some duplicate code and removed `.flash-text` & `.content-wrapper` selectors as they didn't seem to be necessary.
I manually tested JS-initiated Flash alerts to make sure this doesn't affect their appearance. I also grepped around for anything else that might depend on these styles. Everything checked out. But... can *you* see something this is going to break?
## Why was this MR needed?
Affected users can't read flash alerts.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
Before:
![Screen_Shot_2016-10-05_at_3.02.38_PM](/uploads/af258585e428d82dc2b293434661790b/Screen_Shot_2016-10-05_at_3.02.38_PM.png)
After:
![Screen_Shot_2016-10-05_at_3.02.47_PM](/uploads/75a93235440e2b83088e66bbe53d6cee/Screen_Shot_2016-10-05_at_3.02.47_PM.png)
JS-initiated flash alert (unaffected):
![Screen_Shot_2016-10-05_at_3.39.57_PM](/uploads/ba678cfaeb09c639499059712a33abe8/Screen_Shot_2016-10-05_at_3.39.57_PM.png)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] API support added
- Tests
- [] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22915
cc: @jschatz1
See merge request !6694
|
| | | | | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Updated issuable form with GL dropdowns
## What does this MR do?
This adds back in the GL dropdowns into the issuable form but fixes a lot of usability issues & bugs.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #19879, #19882, #19881, #19883, #19880
## Screenshots (if relevant)
![Screen_Shot_2016-08-30_at_12.13.09](/uploads/f1df758b3fb59958b4e6b62960b81bfb/Screen_Shot_2016-08-30_at_12.13.09.png)
![Screen_Shot_2016-08-30_at_12.13.13](/uploads/6e4fd8f4d874b14eaab6b10752a19df4/Screen_Shot_2016-08-30_at_12.13.13.png)
See merge request !5293
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
revert-c676283b-existing
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | |_|_|_|_|_|/
| | |/| | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
revert-c676283b-existing
# Conflicts:
# app/assets/javascripts/dispatcher.js
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|