| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Revert "Revert "Merge branch '18193-developers-can-merge' into 'master'""
## What does this MR do?
Reverts the revert of !4892 which lacked an EE MR at the time. This has been done in gitlab-org/gitlab-ee!564.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #19872.
See merge request !5310
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This reverts commit 530f5158e297f3cde27f3566cfe13bad74ba3b50.
See !4892.
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Fix activity heatmap to show proper day name.
## What does this MR do?
This MR fixes issue #19909.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Not necessarily, it's pretty straightforward, buuuut
There was some discussion about whether GL wanted the activity heatmap to start on Monday or Sunday, this fix makes it start on Sunday, if GL is wanting it to start on Monday then some more substantial changes need to be made on the `calendar.js.coffee` script.
## Why was this MR needed?
The amount of day names that were off from their dates was too damn high! :P
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Directly #19909
Also some related discussion (feature discussion):
#19282, #5988
## Screenshots (if relevant)
**Currently on GL.com**
**After MR**
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5303
|
| | | | |
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
'master'
Don't blow up in tree view on empty repo
## What does this MR do?
Stop the empty repo page blowing up with a 500 error when a user's default view is tree view.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Don't think so.
## Why was this MR needed?
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/4997 made sure that the `tree` filter was only called if the user's default project view is tree, but left out the empty repo check. When users visit an empty repo with the tree view as default, they now get a 500.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #19928.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- ~~[CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added~~ (bug introduced in same release)
- ~~[Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~
- ~~API support added~~
- Tests
- ~~Added for this feature/bug~~
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5317
|
| | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \
| |/ / /
|/| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Store when and yaml variables in builds table
## What does this MR do?
Stores `when` and `yaml_variables` in `ci_builds` table.
## Why was this MR needed?
This is done in order to simplify the code responsible for creating a pipeline builds.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
This made as a pre-step for https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/5295.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] API support added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5296
|
| | |\ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
store-variables-and-when-in-builds-table
# Conflicts:
# db/schema.rb
|
| | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| |_|/ / /
|/| | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Add Pending Tab to Builds
## What does this MR do?
Add Pending Tab to Builds and separate "running" and "pending" jobs in UI.
## Why was this MR needed?
Increase visibility to "pending" .
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #19408
## Screenshots
Before:
After:
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
cc @ubudzisz @yorickpeterse @grzesiek @tmaczukin @zj [@chastell](https://github.com/chastell) [@tomash](https://github.com/tomash)
See merge request !5084
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Add Pending Tab to Project Builds
Update CHANGELOG
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Track a user who creates a Pipeline
## What does this MR do?
This adds additional column to pipelines to track user who is creating pipelines.
## Why was this MR needed?
This is to make it possible to show all pipelines created by specific user and to later solve: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/18054
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/18992
- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5272
|
| | | |/ / /
| |/| | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Fix creation of deployment on build that is retried, redeployed or rollback
## What does this MR do?
Add missing `environment` to be copied when retrying a build.
## Why was this MR needed?
The retried builds did not create a deployments.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/19521
- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5275
|
| | | |_|/ /
| |/| | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Allow to access Container Registry for Public and Internal projects
## What does this MR do?
Adds missing ability `read_container_image` for `public scope` which affects users accessing public and internal projects.
## Why was this MR needed?
Previously, we allowed to use container registry for anonymous users, but did not allow to do the same for logged in.
This MR makes it possible.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/18176 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/19668 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/19117
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5279
|
| | | |/ / /
| |/| | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|_|/
|/| | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Fix stage status shown for pipelines
## What does this MR do?
Properly calculates a status of stage when shown on a list of pipelines
## Why was this MR needed?
Previously we were calculating a status for all builds, including retried ones.
This were affecting a overall stage status when a build were retried.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/18896 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/18150
- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5277
|
| | |/ / / |
|
| |\ \ \ \
| |_|_|/
|/| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Limit number of project export retries to 3
I think 3 should be a sufficient number of retries - at the moment we were doing 20+
This will only send a maximum of 3 emails if the project export went wrong. Tested - project import is not affected.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/18966
See merge request !5267
|
| | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Allow a project import URL to be blank to prevent false positives in validation
Projects that happen to have blank import URLs were failing validation, causing project settings not to be saved. Loosen the requirement and don't try to use the import data if the URL isn't present.
Closes #19893
See merge request !5309
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | |/ / /
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
preventing settings from being saved
|
| |\ \ \ \
| |/ / /
|/| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Fix not normalized emoji paths
## What does this MR do?
It normalizes emoji names in `api` and `toggle_award`
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
## Why was this MR needed?
User was able to store +1 and thumbsup to databse, causing UI inconsistency.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes #19104
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] API support added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5060
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
* There where path where +1 was stored as +1 not as thumbsup
that was causing problems such as showing thumbsup icon 2 time.
I fixed this to always normalize and store +1 as tumbsup
|
| | | | | |
|
| | |_|/
|/| | |
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Don't fail when a LegacyDiffNote didn't store the right diff
Fixes https://sentry.gitlap.com/gitlab/gitlabcom/issues/8865/ and https://sentry.gitlap.com/gitlab/gitlabcom/issues/8754/
See merge request !5287
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
This reverts merge request !4970
|
| |/ / / |
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Upgrade to Rouge 2.0
## What does this MR do?
This MR is a refactor of the HTMLGitlab formatter. The original was copy-pasted from the legacy HTML formatter and adapted to suit our needs. In particular, this MR:
* Strips dead code and unused options
* Factors out the "wrapping" into the places that care about it - Bonzai and the view helpers
* Uses the Rouge 2.0 `token_lines` method to split tokens into lines, removing the custom code we used to do the same
* Uses the now-public `span` method instead of re-implementing it ourselves
* Removes options to not split into lines - the places where this feature wasn't being used are now using the plain `Formatters::HTML` instead of this class
See merge request !4691
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
the <pre><code> wrapping is *always* used by the helper, and *never* by
anywhere else, so pull the wrapping into the helper
|
| | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Allow U2F devices to be used in Firefox
- Adds U2F support for Firefox
- Improve U2F feature detection logic
- Have authentication flow be closer to the spec (single challenge instead of a challenge for each `signRequest`)
- Closes #17341
- Related to #15337
See merge request !5177
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
1. This scenario was previously tested for the registration flow, but
not authentication.
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
1. According to the spec, either we have a single challenge with
a number of `signRequests`, or a number of `signRequests`, each with
it's own challenge.
2. Previously, we had both these - per-request challenges, as well as a
single extra challenge.
3. This commit changes this so that the per-request challenges are
removed, leaving only a single challenge, as per the v1.1 U2F API.
4. The existing implementation didn't work in Firefox, because the
Firefox (extension) implementation is less flexible with regard to
the inputs.
5. Fix teaspoon specs.
6. References: https://fidoalliance.org/specs/fido-u2f-v1.0-nfc-bt-amendment-20150514/fido-u2f-javascript-api.html#h2_background
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
1. Only on supported Chrome versions
2. Mainly, this lets us simplify the javascript-based U2F check to
`window.u2f`, where `window.u2f` can either be loaded from the GitLab
server (for Chrome) or from the Firefox extension.
3. This is a better way to provide browser detection for U2F.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
'kradydal/gitlab-ce-create-todos-when-issue-author-assigne-or-mention-himself'
|
| | | |_|/ /
| |/| | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
add project name and namespace to filename on project export
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/19848
Export filename now includes project and namespace path
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5268
|
| | |\ \ \ \ \
| | | |_|_|/
| | |/| | |
| | | | | | |
fix/project-export-filename
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
added changelog
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Fix mentioned users on diff notes
## Summary
`DiffNote`, and `LegacyDiffNote` returns empty array for `mentionable_attrs`, because `mentionable_attrs` is not inheritable by subclasses. The problem can be illustrated with this small sample:
```ruby
module Mentionable
extend ActiveSupport::Concern
module ClassMethods
def attr_mentionable(attr)
mentionable_attrs << [attr.to_s]
end
def mentionable_attrs
@mentionable_attrs ||= []
end
end
end
class A
include Mentionable
attr_mentionable :foo
end
class B < A
end
A.mentionable_attrs
=> [["foo", {}]]
B.mentionable_attrs
=> []
```
Possible solution using `cattr_accessor`:
```ruby
module Mentionable
extend ActiveSupport::Concern
module ClassMethods
def attr_mentionable(attr)
mentionable_attrs << [attr.to_s]
end
end
included do
cattr_accessor :mentionable_attrs, instance_accessor: false do
[]
end
end
end
class A
include Mentionable
attr_mentionable :foo
end
class B < A
end
A.mentionable_attrs
=> [["foo"]]
B.mentionable_attrs
=> [["foo"]]
B.mentionable_attrs < [:bar]
=> [["foo"], ["bar"]]
A.mentionable_attrs
=> [["foo"], ["bar"]]
```
`mentionable_attrs` is inheritable by subclasses. If a subclass changes the value then that would also change the value for parent class. Similarly if parent class changes the value then that would change the value of subclasses too.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes #19807
Fixes #18022
/cc @stanhu @DouweM @rspeicher
See merge request !5243
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
| | | |/ / / /
| |/| | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ |
|
