| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Issue #4270: Recursive option for files through API
## What does this MR do?
- Adds recursive param to tree API request. With this param we can get all repository paths in a single request.
- Related [old github pull request](https://github.com/gitlabhq/gitlabhq/pull/9311)
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
## Why was this MR needed?
Requested in #4270
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [X] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [X] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [X] API support added
- Tests
- [X] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Requested in #4270
See merge request !6088
|
| | | |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Add button to delete all merged branches
## What does this MR do?
It adds a button to the branches page that the user can use to delete all the branches that are already merged. This can be used to clean up all the branches that were forgotten to delete while merging MRs.
**Note**
~~This MR is WIP until MR !6408 is merged.~~
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
The UX of the actual "Delete merged branches" button.
## Why was this MR needed?
Fixes #21076
## Screenshots
Before:
After:
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] API support added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #21076
See merge request !6449
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
It adds a button to the branches page that the user can use to delete
all the branches that are already merged. This can be used to clean up
all the branches that were forgotten to delete while merging MRs.
Fixes #21076.
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Fix Error 500 when creating a merge request that contains an image that was deleted and added
_Originally opened at !4816 by @stanhu._
- - -
## What does this MR do?
This MR fixes an Error 500 when creating a merge request that contains an image that was deleted and added. Before, when displaying the before and after image, the code would always retrieve the image from the parent commit. However, in a diff, this could cause two different problems:
The "before" image may not actually be the image you want to compare against (regression of #14327)
It may appear as though a file was modified when it was really just added during the diff
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
There may be a more elegant to fix this bug.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #3893, gitlab-org/gitlab-ee#678
See merge request !7457
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
deleted and added
Steps to reproduce:
1. Start with a repo with an image
2. Add a commit to delete the image
3. Add another commit to replace the image with another image
In a diff comparison, we really just compare about what the image was before the diff, not
the direct parent of the last commit. This MR fixes that.
Closes #3893, gitlab-org/gitlab-ee#678
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Omniauth auto link LDAP user falls back to find by DN when user cannot be found by uid
Unfortunately, SAML IDs can be an LDAP UID, DN, or something else entirely. UID and DN are most common, though. This adds a fallback scenario so we first try to find a matching LDAP user by UID, then by DN. This will fix a problem for the customer in https://gitlab.zendesk.com/agent/tickets/43298
See merge request !7002
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
found by uid
|
| | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
[ci skip]
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Issue #13823: random message when all Todos are Done
## What does this MR do?
Shows a random message every time the To Do list is empty: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/13823
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
It's my first contribution to GitLab so I might need some help:
- I'm loading a yaml file in the controller. I'm not sure where would be the best place to put it.
- I'm also having the error below running the tests but it doesn't seem related to my changes. I think I might have some issue with my config. Could you double check if the tests pass for you?
/home/pep/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.3.1/gems/actionpack-4.2.7.1/lib/action_dispatch/middleware/debug_exceptions.rb:21:in `call': No route matches [GET] "/autocomplete/users/sjobs@apple.com.json" (ActionController::RoutingError)
## Why was this MR needed?
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/13823
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/13823
See merge request !6818
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Give search-input correct padding-right value
## What does this MR do?
This fixes how `padding-right: 20px` was being applied to the style rule of `.search-input`, preventing text in that form from clipping through `.search-icon`
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
If there are any cases where `.search .search-input` is used in a search form where there is no right-side icon (I could not find such occurrence myself).
## Why was this MR needed?
Some text in long search queries were being hidden by the close icon being used in the search form. This makes it a bit more presentable. ;)
## Screenshots (if relevant)
__Before__
__After__
See merge request !7407
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Because 'padding: 0' was being applied to this rule after 'padding-right: 20px' was declared, the former overruled the latter, causing search-input text to clip through the close button on the right of the search form
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|_|_|/ / /
|/| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Project download buttons always show
## What does this MR do?
Removes `hidden-xs hidden-sm` classes from `download-button` so it doesn’t hide itself individually from the rest of the `project-repo-buttons` block
## Why was this MR needed?
Fixes #23960. Not sure why this element had these classes in the first place, but at the very least we shouldn’t be hiding the Download button at the `hidden-sm` threshold since that’s still fairly large viewport and users with viewports of that size likely still want to download source code.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
Screenshots taken at ~830px width
__Before__
__After__
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
#23960
See merge request !7405
|
| | |/ / / / / /
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
This was hidden when the viewport was was below the 'hidden-sm' theshold. Now it displays the same as the rest of the 'project-repo-buttons' block.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|/ / / /
|/| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Fix error links in help index page when access it with url `http://gitlab.example.com/help/` which have an extra slash
Fixes #24349
See merge request !7396
|
| | |/ / / / / |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Centralized all LDAP config logic in to `Gitlab::LDAP::Config`. We had varying configuration for devise/omniauth and other things. For example, `user_filter` was never taken in to account for devise/omniauth so a user object would always be created, even if the user did not match the user_filter.
Fixes gitlab-org/gitlab-ce#21195, https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/15396 and gitlab-org/gitlab-ce#13296
See merge request !6606
|
| | | |_|_|_|/
| |/| | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Centralize all LDAP config logic in `GitLab::LDAP::Config`. Previously,
some logic was in the Devise initializer and it was not honoring the
`user_filter`. If a user outside the configured `user_filter` signed
in, an account would be created but they would then be denied access.
Now that logic is centralized, the filter is honored and users outside
the filter are never created.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Fix project Visibility level selector not using default values
closes #20245
See merge request !7264
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Added ability to put emojis into repository name
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Ensure that regexp used is correct, I used the following list: http://www.unicode.org/Public/emoji/1.0/emoji-data.txt
See merge request !7420
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Added ability to put emojis into repository name
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Resolve "Link from build page to its pipeline"
## What does this MR do?
Adds references and links to a build's pipeline within both individual build pages and the build index.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Nothing springs to mind
## Why was this MR needed?
See #22307
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md) entry added
- Tests
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #22307
See merge request !7082
|
| | | |_|_|_|_|/ /
| |/| | | | | | |
|
| | |_|_|/ / / /
|/| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
- Also remove unnecessary param
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|_|_|/ /
|/| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Ensure labels are loaded for all "show" methods of MR Controller
Closes #24397
See merge request !7416
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Previously, they were only being loaded on the actual `show` action, but
not the actions representing the tabs (commits, builds, etc).
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |/ / / / / /
|/| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Allow certain Sidekiq jobs to be throttled
## What does this MR do?
Allows certain slow running Sidekiq jobs to be throttled. It is disabled by default and can be enabled via the Application Settings.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md) entry added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Related to #23352
See merge request !7292
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Fix project records with invalid visibility_level values
See merge request !7391
|
| | |/ / / / / /
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
The AddVisibilityLevelToGroups migration introduced a visibility_level for
namespaces and specified that projects should always have a visibility level
less than or equal to their namespace. However, some invalid rows could have
been created.
This commit introduces a migration that updates the invalid rows, setting the
invalid project to have the same visibility_level as their namespaces. This
will make some projects internal or private when they would previously have
been public or internal, but this is better than silently making an internal
or private group public.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Fix the collapsed diff when converting a symlink to a regular file
#21610
!6828
See merge request !6953
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
In this case comparing old_path and new_path is not enough because there
are two entires that match.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|_|/ / / /
|/| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Require projects before creating milestone
Closes #24101
See merge request !7301
|
| | | |_|/ / / /
| |/| | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Remove additional padding on right-aligned items in MR widget.
## What does this MR do?
Remove additional padding on right-aligned items in MR widget. So links look aligned.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
No.
## Why was this MR needed?
Because the links are not aligned.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #24369
See merge request !7411
|
| | | |/ / / / /
| |/| | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Fixes #24369.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|/ / / / /
|/| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
'24279-issue-merge-request-sidebar-todo-button-style-improvement' into 'master'
Removed gray button styling from todo buttons in sidebars
## What does this MR do?
Removes gray button styling from todo buttons in sidebars
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
## Why was this MR needed?
gray buttons are inconsistent and look disabled
## Screenshots (if relevant)
before:
after:
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #24279
See merge request !7387
|
| | | |/ / / /
| |/| | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Fix no "Register" tab if ldap auth is enabled (#24038)
Closes #24038
See merge request !7274
|
| | |/ / / / /
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
This commit is dedicated to GuilhemB, thanks for supporting me on Tipeee
:-)
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| |/ / / / /
|/| | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Resolves divider issue in group setting dropdown
## What does this MR do?
This MR resolves the issue #24048
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
NR
## Why was this MR needed?
This MR removes extra divider from group setting dropdown when there is only one entry to show. This improves UX
## Screenshots (if relevant)
**Before**
**After**
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] API support added
- Tests
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #24048
See merge request !7398
|
| | | |_|/ /
| |/| | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
'master'
Fix error when using invalid branch name when creating a new pipeline
## What does this MR do?
This MR fixes `500` error when creating a new pipeline though user interface ("Run pipeline")
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Is this a good approach to catch those exceptions on `Repository` level?
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #23982
See merge request !7324
|
| | | |_|_|/
| |/| | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Fix cache for commit status in commits list to respect branches
Fix cache for commit status in commits list to respect branches
Closes #24324
See merge request !7372
|
