| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
|
| |\ |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
We need this to prevent routing error when user access URL like /123
when there is no resource located under such name
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
|
| | | |
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Tab between register and sign in forms
- Add individual input validation error messages
- Validate username
- Update many styles for all login-box forms
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Add missing routes to make group edits work
6b90ccb9fd changed the routes so that users/groups can be accessed via`/:id`, but the Rails `form_for` method expects to use the `groups#show` path helper for the form action URL. This causes group edits and deletes to fail because the PUT/PATCH/DELETE methods did not exist for `/:id`. This MR adds these methods so that `form_for` continues to work.
Closes #23306
See merge request !6874
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Closes #23306
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Project members UI
## What does this MR do?
New UI for project members that includes groups.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
### Project members
### Group members
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Part of #19868
Closes #21320
See merge request !6148
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Used variables in haml for replicated checks
Fixed broken conflict
|
| | |\ \ |
|
| | |\ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | |_|_|/
|/| | |
| | | |
| | | | |
set up frontend polling
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Refactoring Issues Board
## What does this MR do?
This MR aims to minimize conflicts between the CE issues board feature with EE multiple boards feature.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
## Why was this MR needed?
To avoid a lot of conflicts with EE multiple boards feature.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [ ] ~~[CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added~~
- [ ] ~~[Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~
- [x] API support added
- Tests
- [X] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [X] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/929
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/1084
See merge request !6727
|
| | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Added 'Download' button to snippet view
## What does this MR do?
Adds a `Download` button above a snippet.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
## Why was this MR needed?
Requested in #22811
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #22811
See merge request !6720
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Ability to bulk assign issues to author of merge request
## What does this MR do?
Provides a link to auto-assign issues to the author of a merge request, when they are mentioned as being closed by the MR.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
## Why was this MR needed?
To help avoid working on a MR without having assigned related issues to self
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes #18876
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Tasks
- [x] Refactor or move away from using `BulkUpdateService`
- [x] ~~Consider alternate link message when only a subset of issues will be assigned~~
- [x] Minimize repeated calls to expensive `closes_issues` method
- [x] Move away from using inflector for pluralization and fix flash message
- [x] Change auth `before_action` and fallback to error flash message
- [x] Shouldn't overwrite current assignee if one exists
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] ~~[Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~
- [x] ~~API support added~~
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5725
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|/ / / /
|/| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Allow browsing branches that end with '.atom'
## What does this MR do?
1. Simplify the regex capture in the routing for the CommitsController
to not exclude the '.atom' suffix. That's a perfectly valid git
branch name, so we shouldn't blow up if we get it.
2. Because Rails now can't automatically detect the request format, add
some code to do so in `ExtractPath` when there is no path. This means
that, given branches 'foo' and 'foo.atom', the Atom feed for the
former is unroutable. To fix this: don't do that! Give the branches
different names!
## Why was this MR needed?
Creating a branch or tag name ending in '.atom' would cause some 500s on that repo.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #21955. Related to !5994.
See merge request !6750
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
We need to do two things to support this:
1. Simplify the regex capture in the routing for the CommitsController
to not exclude the '.atom' suffix. That's a perfectly valid git
branch name, so we shouldn't blow up if we get it.
2. Because Rails now can't automatically detect the request format, add
some code to do so in `ExtractPath` when there is no path. This means
that, given branches 'foo' and 'foo.atom', the Atom feed for the
former is unroutable. To fix this: don't do that! Give the branches
different names!
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Move reply by email docs to a new location
## What does this MR do?
Move reply by email docs to a new location.
Part of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/3349
## Moving docs to a new location?
See the guidelines: http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/doc_styleguide.html#changing-document-location
- [ ] Make sure the old link is not removed and has its contents replaced with a link to the new location.
- [ ] Make sure internal links pointing to the document in question are not broken.
- [ ] Search and replace any links referring to old docs in GitLab Rails app, specifically under the `app/views/` directory.
- [ ] If working on CE, submit an MR to EE with the changes as well.
See merge request !6517
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
[ci skip]
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Precalculate trending projects
## What does this MR do?
This MR changes the trending projects code so that data is precalculated, removing the need for any complex caching mechanisms.
## Why was this MR needed?
Caching of trending data didn't work properly, still leading to queries. Using caching in general would be very hard due to users being able to apply custom filters to the list of trending projects.
See merge request !6749
|
| | | |_|_|/ / / /
| |/| | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
This commit introduces a Sidekiq worker that precalculates the list of
trending projects on a daily basis. The resulting set is stored in a
database table that is then queried by Project.trending.
This setup means that Unicorn workers no longer _may_ have to calculate
the list of trending projects. Furthermore it supports filtering without
any complex caching mechanisms.
The data in the "trending_projects" table is inserted in the same order
as the project ranking. This means that getting the projects in the
correct order is simply a matter of:
SELECT projects.*
FROM projects
INNER JOIN trending_projects ON trending_projects.project_id = projects.id
ORDER BY trending_projects.id ASC;
Such a query will only take a few milliseconds at most (as measured on
GitLab.com), opposed to a few seconds for the query used for calculating
the project ranks.
The migration in this commit does not require downtime and takes care of
populating an initial list of trending projects.
|
| |/ / / / / / /
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
The main purpose of this controller was redirect to group or user page
when URL like https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org was used. Now this
functionality is handled by contrainers and take user to correct
controller right from the start
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
|
| | |/ / / / /
|/| | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
are used
Closes #23131
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Memoize Github::Shell's secret token
## What does this MR do?
`API::Helpers#secret_token` was reading the secret file on every invocation. This MR reads the file in the `gitlab_shell_secret_token.rb` initializer and saves it as a class variable at `Gitlab::Shell.secret_token`
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
- I'm not sure if the use of `cattr_accessor` is the best approach, or if should be moved into the `class << self` block?
- Should `API::Helpers#secret_token` be removed in favor of using `Gitlab::Shell.secret_token`?
## Why was this MR needed?
Performance optimization.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22510
See merge request !6599
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
every request.
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
This commit adds a number of _html columns and, with the exception of Note,
starts updating them whenever the content of their partner fields changes.
Note has a collision with the note_html attr_accessor; that will be fixed later
A background worker for clearing these cache columns is also introduced - use
`rake cache:clear` to set it off. You can clear the database or Redis caches
separately by running `rake cache:clear:db` or `rake cache:clear:redis`,
respectively.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Memoize ActiveRecord::Migrator.migrations in tests
See merge request !6723
|
| | | |_|_|_|_|/
| |/| | | | | |
|
| | |/ / / / /
|/| | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| |/ / / / /
|/| | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Issue boards new issue form
## What does this MR do?
Adds a new issue form into the issue boards lists.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Part of #21219
See merge request !6653
|
| | | |/ / /
| |/| | | |
|
| |/ / / / |
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| | |/ / /
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22537
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
separate files
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
|
| | |_|/
|/| |
| | |
| | | |
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
|
| | | | |
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Initialize Redis pool in single-threaded context
See merge request !6613
|
| | |/ /
| | |
| | |
| | | |
This side-steps the need for mutexes and whatnot.
|
| | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ |
|
