| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Remove Hound CI and Teatro config
## What does this MR do?
Since we moved to gitlab.com we don't use Hound CI and Teatro anymore. Instead we have rubocop.
See merge request !5089
|
| | | |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Update the health_check gem to the latest release
## What does this MR do?
Update the health_check gem to the latest release, which allows us to drop some of our code for overwriting the email check
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] ~~[Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~
- [ ] ~~API support added~~
- Tests
- [ ] ~~Added for this feature/bug~~
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5186
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
This allows us to drop our disable email config override
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
parameters.
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
This is probably a horrible way of fixing this issue, but it does work.
I can’t find much information on linking this deeply with Rails routes.
Resolves #14872.
|
| |\ \ \
| |/ / |
|
| | |\ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Split Cropper.js from the main JavaScript manifest.
## What does this MR do?
Splits Cropper.js from the main JavaScript file.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
That the avatar uploader works. (It did in my testing)
## Why was this MR needed?
Smaller JS payload.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
#14372
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- Tests
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !4978
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| |/ / /
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
When rendering a list of diff files, skip those where the diff is over
10 KB and provide an endpoint to render individually instead.
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Allow specifying protected branches using wildcards
Closes #18627
# Tasks
- [ ] #18627 !4665 Allow specifying protected branches using wildcards
- [x] Find existing usages of protected branches
- Protecting branches
- `ProtectedBranchesController` is used to mark a branch protected/unprotected
- `API::Branches` can be used to mark a branch protected/unprotected
- Enforcing branch protection
- `Gitlab::GitAccess` has helpers (`can_push_to_branch?`, `check`) that are used to deny pushes if a branch is protected
- Over SSH: `gitlab-shell` receives a push, and calls `/allowed` on the GitLab API, which calls `GitAccess.check`
- Over HTTP:
- `gitlab-workhorse` receives the request, and forwards it to rails
- Rails (in the `GitHttpController#git-recieve-pack`) runs basic checks (is the user logged in, not protected branch checks) and returns ok with `GL_ID` and `RepoPath`
- `gitlab-workhorse` looks at the response, and calls the relevant `gitlab-shell` action from `git-http/handlePostRPC`
- Rest of this flow is the same as the SSH flow above
- [x] Implementation
- [x] Backend
- [x] Change `project#protected_branch?` to look at wildcard protected branches
- [x] Change `project#developers_can_push_to_protected_branch?`
- [x] Change `project#open_branches`
- [x] Better error message when creating a disallowed branch from the Web UI
- [x] Frontend
- [x] Protected branches page should allow typing out a wildcard pattern
- [x] Add help text explaining the use of wildcards
- [x] Show matching branches for each protected branch
- [x] ~~On the index page~~
- [x] On a show page
- [x] Index?
- [x] Can't have the "last commit" column for wildcard protected branches
- [x] Fix / write tests
- [x] What happens if a hook is missing in dev?
- [x] Refactor
- [x] Test workflows
- Create a branch matching a wildcard pattern
- Push to a branch matching a wildcard pattern
- Force push to a branch matching a wildcard pattern
- Delete a branch matching a wildcard pattern
- [x] Test using Web UI
- [x] Test over SSH
- [x] Test over HTTP
- [x] Test as developer and master
- [x] Investigate performance
- [x] Test with a large number of protected branches / branches
- [x] Paginate list of protected branches
- [x] ~~Possibly rewrite `open_branches`~~
- [x] Add `iid`s to existing `ProtectedBranch`es
- [x] Add documentation
- [x] Add CHANGELOG entry
- [x] Add screenshots
- [x] Make sure [build](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/2f753e3ed2ce681b4444944d521f4419e8ed37f7/builds) passes
- [x] Assign to endboss for review
- [x] Address @DouweM's comments
- [x] `protected_branch_params`
- [x] `exact_match` instead of `explicit_match`
- [x] When would self.name be blank?
- [x] Move `protected_branches.each` to a partial
- [x] Move `matching_branches.each` to a partial
- [x] If the branch is in @matching_branches, it's not been removed
- [x] move this regex to a method and memoize it
- [x] `commit_sha` directly for exact matches
- [x] Number of matches for wildcard matches, with a link
- [x] Wait for [build](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/43f9ce0e88194b8f719bb1c1e656b7fc13278d56/builds) to pass
- [x] Respond to @DouweM's comments
- [x] Don't use iid
- [x] Controller should use `@project.protected_branches.new`
- [x] move the memoization to `def wildcard_regex`
- [x] render with `collection: @protected_branches`
- [x] Wait for [build](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/f7beedf122fa0c7aa89e86181fe7499321fb10ca/builds) to pass
- [x] Wait for @DouweM's review
- [x] Wait for @jschatz1's review
- [x] Respond to @jschatz1's comments
- [x] Use the new dropdown style
- [x] description should be moved to the description section without the styling
- [x] Protect button should be disabled when no branch is selected
- [x] Update screenshots
- [x] Merge conflicts
- [x] Make sure [build](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/20f3cfe8d5540eab64c2ba548043d600b28c61ba/builds) passes
- [ ] Revisit performance, possibly with staging/production data
- [ ] Get a dump of staging / run against staging live
- [ ] Get SSH access to staging
- [ ] Wait for review/merge
# Screenshots
## Creating wildcard protected branches
### Using the `GLDropdown` component
## Enforcing wildcard protected branches
### From the Web UI
### Over SSH
### Over HTTPS
## Listing matching branches
See merge request !4665
|
| | | |/
| |/|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
1. Allow entering any branch name for a protected branch.
- Either pick from a list of options, or enter it manually
- You can enter wildcards.
2. Display branches matching a protected branch.
- Add a `ProtectedBranches#show` page that displays the branches
matching the given protected branch, or a message if there are no
matches.
- On the `index` page, display the last commit for an exact match,
or the number of matching branches for a wildcard match.
- Add an `iid` column to `protected_branches` - this is what we use for
the `show` page URL.
- On the off chance that this feature is unnecessary, this commit
encapsulates it neatly, so it can be removed without affecting
anything else.
3. Remove the "Last Commit" column from the list of protected branches.
- There's no way to pull these for wildcard protected branches, so it's
best left for the `show` page.
- Rename the `@branches` instance variable to `@protected_branches`
- Minor styling changes with the "Unprotect" button - floated right
like the "Revoke" button for personal access tokens
4. Paginate the list of protected branches.
5. Move the instructions to the left side of the page.
|
| |/ / |
|
| | | |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Upgrade sprockets and sprockets rails, remove quiet_assets
## What does this MR do?
Upgrade Sprockets from 3.6.0 to 3.6.2.
Changelog: https://github.com/rails/sprockets/blob/3.x/CHANGELOG.md
Upgrade Sprockets Rails from 3.0.4 to 3.1.1.
Changelog: https://github.com/rails/sprockets-rails/compare/v3.0.4...v3.1.1
quiet_assets has been seemingly abandoned, and now sprockets-rails has the feature built-in!
The config was added in this PR: https://github.com/rails/sprockets-rails/pull/355
Working towards #14286.
See merge request !5029
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
quiet_assets has been seemingly abandoned, and now sprockets-rails has the feature built-in!
From this PR: https://github.com/rails/sprockets-rails/pull/355
|
| |/ / |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This stands as an alternative to using OAuth to access a user's Github
repositories. This is setup in such a way that it can be used without OAuth
configuration.
From a UI perspective, the how to import modal has been replaced by a full
page, which includes a form for posting a personal access token back to the
Import::GithubController.
If the user has logged in via GitHub, skip the Personal Access Token and go
directly to Github for an access token via OAuth.
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Make Rack::Request use our trusted proxies when filtering IP addresses
## What does this MR do?
This allows us to control the trusted proxies while deployed in a private network.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
If we want to limit what is impacted, we can do this specifically for the rack_attack request object.
## Why was this MR needed?
Normally Rack::Request will trust all private IPs as trusted proxies, which can cause problems if your users are connection on you network via private IP ranges.
Normally in a rails app this is handled by action_dispatch request, but rack_attack is specifically using the Rack::Request object instead.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/17550
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] ~~[Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~
- [ ] ~~API support added~~
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
\cc @stanhu
See merge request !4958
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
This allows us to control the trusted proxies while deployed in a private network. Normally Rack::Request will trust all private IPs as trusted proxies, which can caue problems if your users are connection on you network via private IP ranges.
Normally in a rails app this is handled by action_dispatch request, but rack_attack is specifically using the Rack::Request object instead.
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Loop all disks when displaying system info. Closes #18886
See merge request !4983
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
install task
|
| | |/ /
|/| | |
|
| | | | |
|
| |/ / |
|
| |/ |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Re-implement page-specific JS in a better way.
## What does this MR do?
This rebuilds the way we do page-specific JavaScript assets for a few reasons:
- The current implementation does not work with Subresource Integrity (!4808)
- The current implementation doesn't allow caching of libraries because each page we hook up with this system will have a separate application.js. Meaning that for every page that uses Ace Editor, we'd have to load Ace Editor plus any GitLab-specific scripts in the same file, making local caching of just Ace Editor impossible.
- The current implementation is rather hacky.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
That Sprockets doesn't choke on this when we use precompiled assets.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
#14372
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] API support added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
cc: @jschatz1 @pavelloz
Thanks to @pavelloz for his example implementation which was very useful.
See merge request !4883
|
| | | |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Add SMTP as default delivery method to match gitlab-org/omnibus-gitlab!826
Something happened after upgrading to 8.9RC5 that caused mail settings to be set to sendmail by default. gitlab-com/infrastructure#128 describes the issue in more detail. This MR mirrors the change in omnibus with gitlab-org/omnibus-gitlab!826.
Closes #19132
See merge request !4915
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Closes #19132
[ci skip]
|
| |\ \ \
| |/ /
|/| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Disable the email checking part of the standard Health Check
## What does this MR do?
In order to fix it we have overwritten the email_configured? method in the health check so that it does not check email status during the standard health check.
## Why was this MR needed?
The email check used in the Heath Check doesn't properly make use of enough of the SMTP config options to be able to properly test the STMP connection, and as a result could cause a failure.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/17742
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] ~~[Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~
- [x] ~~API support added~~
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !4903
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
There was nothing additional in the full checks that we want to run (email, custom)
|
| | |/
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The email check used in the Heath Check doesn't properly make use of enough of the SMTP config options
to be able to properly test the STMP connection, and as a result could cause a failure.
In order to fix it we have overwritten the email_configured? method in the health check
so that it does not check email status during the standard health check.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This commit changes the way certain documents are rendered (currently
only Notes) and how documents are redacted. Previously both rendering
and redacting would run on a per document basis. The result of this was
that for every document we'd have to run countless queries just to
figure out if we could display a set of links or not.
This commit changes things around so that redacting Markdown documents
is no longer tied into the html-pipeline Gem. This in turn allows it to
redact multiple documents in a single pass, thus reducing the number of
queries needed.
In turn rendering issue/merge request notes has been adjusted to take
advantage of this new setup. Instead of rendering Markdown somewhere
deep down in a view the Markdown is rendered and redacted in the
controller (taking the current user and all that into account). This has
been done in such a way that the "markdown()" helper method can still be
used on its own.
This particular commit also paves the way for caching rendered HTML on
object level. Right now there's an accessor method Note#note_html which
is used for setting/getting the rendered HTML. Once we cache HTML on row
level we can simply change this field to be a column and call a "save"
whenever needed and we're pretty much done.
|
| | | |
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
| |
Hamlit is a library that's faster than Haml while implementing most of its features: https://github.com/k0kubun/hamlit
Not sure if this breaks anything, but as far as I can tell most things work the same. No obvious regressions that I've been able to find.
|
| | |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Make it possible to lock runner on a specific project
Make it possible to lock runner on a specific project.
----
----
Closes #3407
See merge request !4093
|
| | |\
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
feature/runner-lock-on-project
* upstream/master: (353 commits)
Put some admin settings in dropdown
Add styleguide on configuration settings documentation
Remove Duplicated keys add UNIQUE index to fingerprint
Avoid autoload issue such as 'Mail::Parsers::AddressStruct'
Move appearance settings as sub tab to application settings
use rails root join
fixed a couple of errors spotted in production
Fix RangeError exceptions when referring to issues or merge requests outside of max database values
Fix bug in `WikiLinkFilter`.
Grammar and typographic changes to artifacts documentation
Tweak grammar
Small frontend code fixes and restore 8a2d88f commit
Warn about admin privilege to disable GitHub Webhooks
Listing GH Webhooks doesn't stop import process for non GH admin users
fixup! updated docs for api endpoint award emoji
Update CHANGELOG
Ensure Todos counters doesn't count Todos for projects pending delete
Add endpoints for award emoji on notes
Sort API endpoints and implement feedback
Add endpoints for Award Emoji
...
|
| | | | |
|
| |\ \ \
| |_|/
|/| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Refs dropdown is now loaded async
## What does this MR do?
The refs dropdown is loaded async so not to block the page.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Part of #18202
## Screenshots (if relevant)
See merge request !4508
|
| | | | |
|
| |/ /
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
By eager-loading the Mail gem in the Sidekiq initializer.
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Implement custom notification level options
part of #12758
See merge request !4389
|
| | |\ \ |
|
| | |\ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
# Conflicts:
# app/controllers/projects/todos_controller.rb
|
