| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Prior, when providing a `min_access_level` parameter to this method, we
called `Gitlab::Access.values` instead of `all_values`, mistakenly
omitting the `OWNER` level.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/19878
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Implements the form for renaming the new filename on the file edit page
## What does this MR do?
Adds the possibility to edit a filename when editing the content of a file on Gitlab
this MR was made to solve #5850
See merge request !5049
|
| | | |
|
| | |\ |
|
| | | | |
|
| | |\ \ |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \
| |_|_|/
|/| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Add support for manual CI actions
## What does this MR do?
This implements a `when: manual` which allows a jobs to be marked as manual actions.
Manual actions have to be explicitly executed by developers.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
This is to solve: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/17010
See merge request !5297
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | |/
| |/|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Manual actions are accessible from:
- Pipelines
- Builds
- Environments
- Deployments
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Allow build email service to be tested
Fixes #13343
See merge request !5223
|
| | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \
| |_|/ /
|/| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Revert "Revert "Merge branch '18193-developers-can-merge' into 'master'""
## What does this MR do?
Reverts the revert of !4892 which lacked an EE MR at the time. This has been done in gitlab-org/gitlab-ee!564.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #19872.
See merge request !5310
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
This reverts commit 530f5158e297f3cde27f3566cfe13bad74ba3b50.
See !4892.
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
store-variables-and-when-in-builds-table
# Conflicts:
# db/schema.rb
|
| | |\ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Track a user who creates a Pipeline
## What does this MR do?
This adds additional column to pipelines to track user who is creating pipelines.
## Why was this MR needed?
This is to make it possible to show all pipelines created by specific user and to later solve: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/18054
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/18992
- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5272
|
| | | | |/ /
| | |/| | |
|
| | |\ \ \ \
| | |_|/ /
| |/| | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Fix stage status shown for pipelines
## What does this MR do?
Properly calculates a status of stage when shown on a list of pipelines
## Why was this MR needed?
Previously we were calculating a status for all builds, including retried ones.
This were affecting a overall stage status when a build were retried.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/18896 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/18150
- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5277
|
| | | |/ / |
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
preventing settings from being saved
|
| | |/ / |
|
| |/ / |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Fix import_data being saved as a result of an invalid import_url
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/19479
Seem that in all cases the `import_url` was an empty string. The `import_url` is now validated correctly and no longer creates the `import_data`even if it fails validation. <= Should cover cases 1, 3, and 4 of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/19479#note_13005276
Also, it now rescues from all exceptions when importing from a URL, so we make sure the `import_status` is failed after that. Covers case 2 of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/19479#note_13005276
See merge request !5206
|
| | |\ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
fix/persistent-import-data
|
| | | |/
| |/|
| | |
| | | |
imports. This should prevent the import_data to be created when it should not and output an error properly validating before creating it.
|
| | |/
|/|
| |
| |
| | |
This reverts commit 9ca633eb4c62231e4ddff5466c723cf8e2bdb25d, reversing
changes made to fb229bbf7970ba908962b837b270adf56f14098f.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
1. When a merge request is being merged, save the merge commit SHA in
the `in_progress_merge_commit_sha` database column.
2. The `pre-receive` hook looks for any locked (in progress) merge
request with `in_progress_merge_commit_sha` matching the `newrev` it
is passed.
3. If it finds a matching MR, the merge is legitimate.
4. Update `git_access_spec` to test the behaviour we added here. Also
refactored this spec a bit to make it easier to add more contexts / conditions.
|
| |/ |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
have been fully redacted and contain cross-project references.
The previous implementation relied on Note#cross_reference_not_visible_for?,
which essentially tries to render all the Markdown references in a system note
and only displays the note if the user can see the referring project. But this
duplicated the work that Banzai::NotesRenderer was doing already. Instead, for
each note we render, we memoize the number of visible user references and
use it later if it is available.
Improves #19273
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
When rendering a list of diff files, skip those where the diff is over
10 KB and provide an endpoint to render individually instead.
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Added setting to set new users by default as external
## What does this MR do?
This implements the feature request #14508. It adds an option in the application settings to set new users by default as external.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Everything. Like I mentioned in the discussion of the issue my knowledge of Ruby basically doesn't exists. I tested it on my machine and it seems to work, but as I am very unexperienced in Ruby I highly recommend to take a close look at the code.
## Why was this MR needed?
It was requested by @DouweM to work on the issue with the proposed changes by me.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
This MR is for the issue #14508 that followed up after the implementation of #4009.
See merge request !4545
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
As requested by the issue #14508 this adds an option in the application
settings to set newly registered users by default as external. The
default setting is set to false to stay backward compatible.
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Allow specifying protected branches using wildcards
Closes #18627
# Tasks
- [ ] #18627 !4665 Allow specifying protected branches using wildcards
- [x] Find existing usages of protected branches
- Protecting branches
- `ProtectedBranchesController` is used to mark a branch protected/unprotected
- `API::Branches` can be used to mark a branch protected/unprotected
- Enforcing branch protection
- `Gitlab::GitAccess` has helpers (`can_push_to_branch?`, `check`) that are used to deny pushes if a branch is protected
- Over SSH: `gitlab-shell` receives a push, and calls `/allowed` on the GitLab API, which calls `GitAccess.check`
- Over HTTP:
- `gitlab-workhorse` receives the request, and forwards it to rails
- Rails (in the `GitHttpController#git-recieve-pack`) runs basic checks (is the user logged in, not protected branch checks) and returns ok with `GL_ID` and `RepoPath`
- `gitlab-workhorse` looks at the response, and calls the relevant `gitlab-shell` action from `git-http/handlePostRPC`
- Rest of this flow is the same as the SSH flow above
- [x] Implementation
- [x] Backend
- [x] Change `project#protected_branch?` to look at wildcard protected branches
- [x] Change `project#developers_can_push_to_protected_branch?`
- [x] Change `project#open_branches`
- [x] Better error message when creating a disallowed branch from the Web UI
- [x] Frontend
- [x] Protected branches page should allow typing out a wildcard pattern
- [x] Add help text explaining the use of wildcards
- [x] Show matching branches for each protected branch
- [x] ~~On the index page~~
- [x] On a show page
- [x] Index?
- [x] Can't have the "last commit" column for wildcard protected branches
- [x] Fix / write tests
- [x] What happens if a hook is missing in dev?
- [x] Refactor
- [x] Test workflows
- Create a branch matching a wildcard pattern
- Push to a branch matching a wildcard pattern
- Force push to a branch matching a wildcard pattern
- Delete a branch matching a wildcard pattern
- [x] Test using Web UI
- [x] Test over SSH
- [x] Test over HTTP
- [x] Test as developer and master
- [x] Investigate performance
- [x] Test with a large number of protected branches / branches
- [x] Paginate list of protected branches
- [x] ~~Possibly rewrite `open_branches`~~
- [x] Add `iid`s to existing `ProtectedBranch`es
- [x] Add documentation
- [x] Add CHANGELOG entry
- [x] Add screenshots
- [x] Make sure [build](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/2f753e3ed2ce681b4444944d521f4419e8ed37f7/builds) passes
- [x] Assign to endboss for review
- [x] Address @DouweM's comments
- [x] `protected_branch_params`
- [x] `exact_match` instead of `explicit_match`
- [x] When would self.name be blank?
- [x] Move `protected_branches.each` to a partial
- [x] Move `matching_branches.each` to a partial
- [x] If the branch is in @matching_branches, it's not been removed
- [x] move this regex to a method and memoize it
- [x] `commit_sha` directly for exact matches
- [x] Number of matches for wildcard matches, with a link
- [x] Wait for [build](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/43f9ce0e88194b8f719bb1c1e656b7fc13278d56/builds) to pass
- [x] Respond to @DouweM's comments
- [x] Don't use iid
- [x] Controller should use `@project.protected_branches.new`
- [x] move the memoization to `def wildcard_regex`
- [x] render with `collection: @protected_branches`
- [x] Wait for [build](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/f7beedf122fa0c7aa89e86181fe7499321fb10ca/builds) to pass
- [x] Wait for @DouweM's review
- [x] Wait for @jschatz1's review
- [x] Respond to @jschatz1's comments
- [x] Use the new dropdown style
- [x] description should be moved to the description section without the styling
- [x] Protect button should be disabled when no branch is selected
- [x] Update screenshots
- [x] Merge conflicts
- [x] Make sure [build](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/20f3cfe8d5540eab64c2ba548043d600b28c61ba/builds) passes
- [ ] Revisit performance, possibly with staging/production data
- [ ] Get a dump of staging / run against staging live
- [ ] Get SSH access to staging
- [ ] Wait for review/merge
# Screenshots
## Creating wildcard protected branches
### Using the `GLDropdown` component
## Enforcing wildcard protected branches
### From the Web UI
### Over SSH
### Over HTTPS
## Listing matching branches
See merge request !4665
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
protected branch.
1. The `open_branches` method is used to provide a list of branches
while creating a protected branch.
2. It makes sense to include branches which are matched by one or more
wildcard protected branches, since the user might want to make exact
protected branches from these as well.
3. This also provides a large performance improvement. On my machine, in
a project with 5000 branches and 2000 protected branches, the
`ProtectedBranches#index` page went from a 40 seconds load time to 4
seconds (10x speedup).
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
1. The main implementation is in the `ProtectedBranch` model. The
wildcard is converted to a Regex and compared. This has been tested
thoroughly.
- While `Project#protected_branch?` is the main entry point,
`project#open_branches` and
`project#developers_can_push_to_protected_branch?`
have also been modified to work with wildcard protected branches.
- The regex is memoized (within the `ProtectedBranch` instance)
2. Improve the performance of `Project#protected_branch?`
- This method is called from `Project#open_branches` once _per branch_
in the project, to check if that branch is protected or not.
- Before, `#protected_branch?` was making a database call every
time it was invoked (in the above case, that amounts to once
per branch), which is expensive.
- This commit caches the list of protected branches in memory, which
reduces the number of database calls down to 1.
- A downside to this approach is that `#protected_branch?` _could_
return a stale value (due to the caching), but this is
an acceptable tradeoff.
3. Remove the (now) unused `Project#protected_branch_names` method.
- This was previously used to check for protected branch status.
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
New diff notes
Fixes #12732, #14731, #19375, #14783
Builds on https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/4110
To do:
- [x] Get it mostly working
- [x] Validate position validity
- [x] Fix: Don’t link to `#`
- [x] Fix: Base ref can be `nil`, potentially, when the MR has an oprhan source branch => Yep, doesn’t work. We need to store a `start_id`
- [x] Optimize: Fewer duplicate `git diff` compares
- [x] Optimize: Pass paths to `PositionTracer#diff` for faster diffs
- [x] Refactor: Use `head_id` in `MergeRequest`/`MergeRequestDiff` instead of `source_sha`
- [x] Refactor: Convert existing array-based diff refs to the DiffRefs model
- [x] Tweak: Use `note_type` in `Autosave` key
- [x] Tweak: Remove `line_code: note.line_code` from `link_to_reply_discussion`
- [x] Update: `SentNotifications` and reply-by-email receiver
- [x] Update: MR diff notification email
- [x] Update: API (MR, Commit note creation and entity)
- [x] Update: GitHub importer
- [x] Address any other TODO comments
- [x] Fix: Suppress "edited 4 minutes ago"
- [x] Write tests
- [x] `LineMapper`
- [x] `PositionTracer`
- [x] `Position`
- [x] `DiffPositionUpdateService`
- [x] `DiffNote`
- [x] `MergeRequests::RefreshService` / `MergeRequest#update_diff_notes_positions`
- [x] Make sure commits with diff notes don't get cleaned up, since this would prevent the diff notes from being rendered (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/5062)
Future improvements:
- Display unresolved comments on files outside the diff, if the comment was added when that file _was_ part of the diff
- Allow commenting on sections between hunks, when expanding the diff using `...`
- (We'd need to generate line code based on Position if we have it, even if it falls outside bounds of diff)
- `diff_hunk` on diff note API entity
- Show diff hunk in notification email
- Resolved line notes would have a boolean, and be inactive through `notes.any? { !active? || resolved? }`
- Multi line notes would store a number of positions, and do the right thing (™) in grouping and then rendering if the first item is multiline? => true
- Image diff notes could store x,y,width,height instead of old_line,new_line for similar grouping. Does it need a reference to say if it's on old or new? These can't have line_codes, clearly. Rendering would be interesting.
- Show commit line comments in the MR diff
- Comment on specific selected words
- Comment on file header
- Unfold top of discussion diff note
- New diff notes API for commits and MRs
/cc @rspeicher
See merge request !4101
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | |
|
| | | |/
| |/|
| | |
| | | |
consistent
|
| |/ /
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
If the Sidekiq job fails for some reason, a project can be 'stuck'
pending deletion. The project can't be viewed, so it shouldn't be
available through the notification settings association as this will
throw an exception when we try to show the link.
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
'master'
Fix diff comments not showing up in activity feed
## What does this MR do?
It fixes the detection of note events to check for `Note` and `LegacyDiffNote`.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
No? /cc @DouweM (since I believe you introduced `LegacyDiffNote`
## Why was this MR needed?
To fix #19092.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes #19092.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5069
|
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
|
