| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fix missing flash messages on service edit page
## What does this MR do?
This MR fixes missing post-update flash notifications for service edit page. Bug was introduced in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/76aad9b76ed756ca9ba2cbcdb399c815e542b3ae#3ca7aff54d2814b971a98a7bf2837e07ab3dfa04_21_20 and caused by passing `notice: Successfully updated.` to path helper instead of passing it to `redirect_to` due to wrong parenthesis placement.
## Why was this MR needed?
While adding HipChat integration I noticed that no messages are being displayed after clicking on "Save changes" button. I looked into code and observed that there is a code for these messages which once worked but doesn't work anymore. It's a regression which should be fixed.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !6195
|
| | | |
|
| |\ \
| |/
|/|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Safer ref updates
Use `git update-ref` to prevent clobbering concurrent ref updates. If
rugged/libgit2 is temporarily confused, due to concurrent `git gc` for
example, then it used to be possible to accidentally reset a ref to an
earlier state and lose commits. Because `git update-ref` does not get
confused by `git gc`, what will happen now is that the commit based on
confused information fails, preventing data loss.
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/20353
See merge request !6130
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
```
Failure/Error: namespace.human_name + ' / ' + name
ActionView::Template::Error:
undefined method `+' for nil:NilClass
# ./app/models/project.rb:807:in `name_with_namespace'
# ./app/views/layouts/project.html.haml:1:in `_app_views_layouts_project_html_haml___2918737809244135908_70160161538920
'
# ./app/controllers/projects/commit_controller.rb:23:in `show'
# ./lib/gitlab/request_profiler/middleware.rb:15:in `call'
# ./lib/gitlab/middleware/go.rb:16:in `call'
# ./lib/gitlab/middleware/static.rb:9:in `call'
# ------------------
# --- Caused by: ---
# NoMethodError:
# undefined method `+' for nil:NilClass
# ./app/models/project.rb:807:in `name_with_namespace'
```
Capybara's `click_link` method doesn't actually wait for the page to reload.
When the `expand_all_diffs` parameter is used, we need to search for unique
elements that appear to ensure that the page has actually reloaded.
Closes #21841
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Convert datetime coffeescript spec to ES6
## What does this MR do?
Converts the last remnant coffeescript file to ES6
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
None
## Why was this MR needed?
Because we aren't using coffeescript anymore :balloon:
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
#21472
## Screenshots (if relevant)
None
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !6045
|
| | |/ |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Hides merge request section in edit project when disabled
## What does this MR do?
Correctly hides the merge request section in the project edit page when disabled. It used to work before the feature visibility part was changed to dropdown - so added a test to prevent in future! :thumbsup:
## Screenshots (if relevant)
See merge request !6175
|
| | |/ |
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Handle error on trace raw download with old builds (DB stored)
## What does this MR do?
Handles error on `raw build trace` download action for old builds (which are stored in DB instead of file).
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
No.
## Why was this MR needed?
At the beginning build traces were stored in database but at some point we moved to store them in files. All trace related actions are aware of this, but not `raw trace download`.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes #18900
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] ~~[Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~
- [ ] ~~API support added~~
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !4822
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
| |\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Prepend blank line to close message on merge request
## What does this MR do?
Adds a new line above the "Closes" message on a merge request.
## Why was this MR needed?
Autoappended `Closes` to the end of merge request needs a new line in the beginning. When using descriptive commit messages and the commit message body is used for the body of the merge request the Closes message should appear on a line by itself.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
#21710
See merge request !6151
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
- Added an extra new line to the prepend of the Close message
Fixes #21710
|
| |\ \ \ \
| |_|_|/
|/| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Minor edits to two_factor_recovery_codes API error catching
Minor fixes to the `two_factor_recovery_codes` internal API making the conditionals more sane. Thanks @DouweM for pointing it out.
See merge request !6000
|
| | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Add the total number of issues in the JSON response in issue board lists
## What does this MR do?
Add the total number of issues in the JSON response in issue board lists
## Why was this MR needed?
The issue board lists should always show the total number of issues in the list, not the current amount fetched by endless scroll.
Closes #21327
See merge request !5904
|
| | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Only visible when scrollable area is larger than height
|
| | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
'21508-inconsistency-personal-dashboard-todos-page-uses-old-interface-wrong-dropdown-filter-buttons' into 'master'
Update todo view filter dropdowns
## What does this MR do?
Swaps out old `select2` dropdowns on todo page with newer dropdowns.
Also removes todo inline JS.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
## Why was this MR needed?
## Screenshots (if relevant)
### Project
### Author
### Type
### Action
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #21508
Related to #19866
See merge request !6072
|
| | | |_|_|/
| |/| | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|_|/
|/| | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Optimize branch lookups and force a repository reload for Repository#find_branch
See merge request !6087
|
| | |/ / /
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
If `git gc` runs and `Repository` has an instance to `Rugged::Repository`, a
bug in libgit2 may cause the instance to return a stale value or a missing
branch. This change not only optimizes the branch lookup so we don't have
to iterate through every branch, but it also works around the `git gc`
issue by forcing a repository reload every time `Repository#find_branch`
is called.
See: https://github.com/libgit2/libgit2/issues/1534
Closes #15392, #21470
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Project tools visibility level
## part of #19734
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] API support added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5606
|
| | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Merge request sha info
## What does this MR do?
Exposes `sha` and `merge_commit_sha` items in `MergeRequest` API endpoint data.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
No.
## Why was this MR needed?
It's useful information.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #20456.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
N/A
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] API support added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !5966
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Fixes #20456.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Use JavaScript tooltips for mentions
## What does this MR do?
- use JavaScript tooltips instead of plain title for mentions (issue, merge request, snippet, user, group, commit, commit range, milestone)
## Why was this MR needed?
JavaScript tooltips look nicer and can wrap.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/5261#note_13106713, fixes #21500
See merge request !5301
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|_|/ / /
|/| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Order award tooltips by their created_at date
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #20601
See merge request !6086
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
| | |_|_|/ / /
|/| | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|/ / / /
|/| | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Refactor ability.rb into Policies
## What does this MR do?
Factors out `ability.rb` into a new abstraction - the "policy" (stored in `app/policies`). A policy is a class named `#{class_name}Policy` (looked up automatically as needed) that implements `rules` as follows:
``` ruby
class ThingPolicy < BasePolicy
def rules
@user # this is a user to determine abilities for, optionally nil in the anonymous case
@subject # this is the subject of the ability, guaranteed to be an instance of `Thing`
can! :some_ability # grant the :some_ability permission
cannot! :some_ability # ensure that :some_ability is not allowed. this overrides any `can!` that is called before or after
delegate! @subject.other_thing # merge the abilities (can!) and prohibitions (cannot!) from `@subject.other_thing`
can? :some_ability # test whether, so far, :some_ability is allowed
end
def anonymous_rules
# optional. if not implemented `rules` is called where `@user` is nil. otherwise this method is called when `@user` is nil.
end
end
```
See merge request !5796
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
re a conversation with @rspeicher, this spec isn't really testing
anything.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Add a BroadcastMessage API
Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/21628
See merge request !6112
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Fix bug where pagination is still displayed despite all todos marked as done
## What does this MR do?
Changes the todo `mark all as done` button callback to remove pagination and add user friendly text `"You're all done!"` so that it is consistent with what the page should look like after refreshing
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Shouldn't be
## Why was this MR needed?
Resolve existing UI inconsistency
## Screenshots (if relevant)
Before:
After:
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #21048
See merge request !6113
|
| | | |/ / / / /
| |/| | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Check for existance of elements under test in application_spec.js
## What does this MR do?
Checks that the elements under test in `application_spec.js` actually exist.
## Why was this MR needed?
```
$ echo 'just garbage' > spec/javascripts/fixtures/application.html.haml
$ bundle exec teaspoon spec/javascripts/application_spec.js
2 examples, 0 failures
```
See merge request !6051
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|/ / / / /
|/| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Fixed escaping issue with labels filter
## What does this MR do?
Encodes label names to stop any JS errors.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #15552
See merge request !6123
|
| | | |_|_|_|/ /
| |/| | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Closes #15552
|
