From f94d3e30fa6c16fe97d29fdb4b6bd33917386b4b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Carlos=20Soriano=20S=C3=A1nchez?= Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 08:11:41 +0000 Subject: CONTRIBUTING.md: Use a proper example for stewardship label The bug guidelines example of what should be marked with the stewardship label goes against the principles of GitLab as stated in https://about.gitlab.com/stewardship/ since mentions removing a feature from GitLab CE to make it exclusive of GitLab EE. The example should be the opposite, where GitLab Inc. is bringing a feature from GitLab EE to GitLab CE. This commit changes the example to reflect this situation. Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/43579 --- CONTRIBUTING.md | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/CONTRIBUTING.md b/CONTRIBUTING.md index dfe4bf65f9f..b70d2da5bea 100644 --- a/CONTRIBUTING.md +++ b/CONTRIBUTING.md @@ -397,9 +397,9 @@ For issues related to the open source stewardship of GitLab, there is the ~"stewardship" label. This label is to be used for issues in which the stewardship of GitLab -is a topic of discussion. For instance if GitLab Inc. is planning to remove -features from GitLab CE to make exclusive in GitLab EE, related issues -would be labelled with ~"stewardship". +is a topic of discussion. For instance if GitLab Inc. is planning to add +features from GitLab EE to GitLab CE, related issues would be labelled with +~"stewardship". A recent example of this was the issue for [bringing the time tracking API to GitLab CE][time-tracking-issue]. -- cgit v1.2.1