Return-Path: Received: from iceking.adventuretime.ooo ([unix socket]) by iceking (Cyrus v2.2.13-Debian-2.2.13-19+squeeze3) with LMTPA; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 17:03:50 -0400 Received: from mail-ie0-x234.google.com (mail-ie0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::234]) by iceking.adventuretime.ooo (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id r5DL3nFJ016967 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 17:03:50 -0400 Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id f4so21977375iea.25 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 14:03:48 -0700 Received: by 10.0.0.1 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 14:03:48 -0700 Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 17:03:48 -0400 From: Jake the Dog To: reply+59d8df8370b7e95c5a49fbf86aeb2c93@appmail.adventuretime.ooo Message-ID: Subject: re: [Discourse Meta] eviltrout posted in 'Adventure Time Sux' Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2 X-Received: by 10.0.0.1 with SMTP id n7mr11234144ipb.85.1371157428600; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 14:03:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.69 on IPv6:2001:470:1d:165::1 Is there any reason the *old* candy can't be be kept in silos while the new candy is imported into *new* silos? The thing about candy is it stays delicious for a long time -- we can just keep it there without worrying about it too much, imo. Thanks for listening. On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 1:39 PM, eviltrout via Discourse Meta wrote: > > > > eviltrout posted in 'Adventure Time Sux' on Discourse Meta: > > --- > hey guys everyone knows adventure time sucks! > > --- > Please visit this link to respond: http://localhost:3000/t/adventure-time-sux/1234/3 > > To unsubscribe from these emails, visit your [user preferences](http://localhost:3000/user_preferences). >