summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/.gitlab/issue_templates/Feature proposal.md
blob: dd8e125916e4113044ed68af25e5e8a5ae12193c (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
### Problem to solve

<!-- What problem do we solve? -->

### Target audience

<!-- For whom are we doing this? Include either a persona from https://design.gitlab.com/getting-started/personas or define a specific company role. e.a. "Release Manager" or "Security Analyst".
Use the persona labels as well https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/labels?utf8=%E2%9C%93&subscribed=&search=persona%3A -->

### Further details

<!-- Include use cases, benefits, and/or goals (contributes to our vision?) -->

### Proposal

<!-- How are we going to solve the problem? Try to include the user journey! https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/journeys/#user-journey -->

### Documentation

<!-- What doc pages need to be created or updated across user, admin, and API docs?
What concepts, procedures, or information is needed in each area? Is there an 'old way' to deprecate in docs?

Product managers:
* By the kickoff, finalize the answers to the bullets above, and also:
  * When applicable, specify a new or updated feature name, description, benefits,
    and use cases, which may all be used in the documentation or features.yml.
  * Specify which use cases or scenarios would benefit from a set of instructions or a guide,
    whether unique to a single use case or flexible enough to cover multiple use cases. -->

### What does success look like, and how can we measure that?

<!-- Define both the success metrics and acceptance criteria. Note that success metrics indicate the desired business outcomes, while acceptance criteria indicate when the solution is working correctly. If there is no way to measure success, link to an issue that will implement a way to measure this. -->

### Links / references

/label ~feature