summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/development/testing_guide/end_to_end/style_guide.md
blob: 97560e616a17cbc992ce539b900784040e266983 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
# Style guide for writing end-to-end tests

This document describes the conventions used at GitLab for writing End-to-end (E2E) tests using the GitLab QA project.

## `click_` versus `go_to_`

### When to use `click_`?

When clicking in a single link to navigate, use `click_`.

E.g.:

```ruby
def click_ci_cd_pipelines
  within_sidebar do
    click_element :link_pipelines
  end
end
```

From a testing perspective, if we want to check that clicking a link, or a button (a single interaction) is working as intended, we would want the test to read as:

- Click a certain element
- Verify the action took place

### When to use `go_to_`?

When interacting with multiple elements to go to a page, use `go_to_`.

E.g.:

```ruby
def go_to_operations_environments
  hover_operations do
    within_submenu do
      click_element(:operations_environments_link)
    end
  end
end
```

`go_to_` fits the definition of interacting with multiple elements very well given it's more of a meta-navigation action that includes multiple interactions.

Notice that in the above example, before clicking the `:operations_environments_link`, another element is hovered over.

> We can create these methods as helpers to abstract multi-step navigation.

## Element naming convention

When adding new elements to a page, it's important that we have a uniform element naming convention.

We follow a simple formula roughly based on hungarian notation.

*Formula*: `element :<descriptor>_<type>`

- `descriptor`: The natural-language description of what the element is. On the login page, this could be `username`, or `password`.
- `type`: A physical control on the page that can be seen by a user.
  - `_button`
  - `_link`
  - `_tab`
  - `_dropdown`
  - `_field`
  - `_checkbox`
  - `_radio`
  - `_content`

*Note: This list is a work in progress. This list will eventually be the end-all enumeration of all available types.
        I.e., any element that does not end with something in this list is bad form.*

### Examples

**Good**

```ruby
view '...' do
  element :edit_button
  element :notes_tab
  element :squash_checkbox
  element :username_field
  element :issue_title_content
end
```

**Bad**

```ruby
view '...' do
  # `_confirmation` should be `_field`. what sort of confirmation? a checkbox confirmation? no real way to disambiguate.
  # an appropriate replacement would be `element :password_confirmation_field`
  element :password_confirmation

  # `clone_options` is too vague. If it's a dropdown menu, it should be `clone_dropdown`.
  # If it's a checkbox, it should be `clone_checkbox`
  element :clone_options

  # how is this url being displayed? is it a textbox? a simple span?
  # If it is content on the page, it should be `ssh_clone_url_content`
  element :ssh_clone_url
end
```

## Block argument naming

To have a standard on how we call pages when using the `.perform` method, we use the name of page object being called, all lowercased, and separated by underscore, if needed (see good and bad examples below.) This also applies to resources. We chose not to simply use `page` because that would shadow the Capybara DSL, potentially leading to confusion and bugs.

### Examples

**Good**

```ruby
# qa/specs/features/browser_ui/1_manage/project/add_project_member_spec.rb

Page::Project::Settings::Members.perform do |members|
  members.do_something
end
```

```ruby
# qa/specs/features/ee/browser_ui/3_create/merge_request/add_batch_comments_in_merge_request_spec.rb

Resource::MergeRequest.fabricate! do |merge_request|
  merge_request.do_something_else
end
```

**Bad**

```ruby
# qa/specs/features/browser_ui/1_manage/project/add_project_member_spec.rb

Page::Project::Settings::Members.perform do |project_settings_members_page|
  project_settings_members_page.do_something
end
```

```ruby
# qa/specs/features/ee/browser_ui/3_create/merge_request/add_batch_comments_in_merge_request_spec.rb

Resource::MergeRequest.fabricate! do |merge_request_page|
  merge_request_page.do_something_else
end
```

> Besides the advantage of having a standard in place, by following this standard we also write shorter lines of code.