blob: e9047750f3e05292986b0b081d474805c2af1874 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
|
# frozen_string_literal: true
require_relative '../code_reuse_helpers'
module RuboCop
module Cop
# This cop checks for a call to `data_consistency` to exist in Sidekiq workers.
#
# @example
#
# # bad
# class BadWorker
# def perform
# end
# end
#
# # good
# class GoodWorker
# data_consistency :delayed
#
# def perform
# end
# end
#
class WorkerDataConsistency < RuboCop::Cop::Cop
include CodeReuseHelpers
HELP_LINK = 'https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/sidekiq_style_guide.html#job-data-consistency-strategies'
MSG = <<~MSG
Should define data_consistency expectation.
It is encouraged for workers to use database replicas as much as possible by declaring
data_consistency to use the :delayed or :sticky modes. Mode :always will result in the
worker always hitting the primary database node for both reads and writes, which limits
scalability.
Some guidelines:
1. If your worker mostly writes or reads its own writes, use mode :always. TRY TO AVOID THIS.
2. If your worker performs mostly reads and can tolerate small delays, use mode :delayed.
3. If your worker performs mostly reads but cannot tolerate any delays, use mode :sticky.
See #{HELP_LINK} for a more detailed explanation of these settings.
MSG
def_node_search :application_worker?, <<~PATTERN
`(send nil? :include (const nil? :ApplicationWorker))
PATTERN
def_node_search :data_consistency_defined?, <<~PATTERN
`(send nil? :data_consistency ...)
PATTERN
def on_class(node)
return unless in_worker?(node) && application_worker?(node)
return if data_consistency_defined?(node)
add_offense(node, location: :expression)
end
end
end
end
|
