blob: 2a9a27752c126416dc28cf8c94eb1c53c904d05c (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
|
require 'spec_helper'
describe AwardEmoji, models: true do
describe 'Associations' do
it { is_expected.to belong_to(:awardable) }
it { is_expected.to belong_to(:user) }
end
describe 'modules' do
it { is_expected.to include_module(Participable) }
end
describe "validations" do
it { is_expected.to validate_presence_of(:awardable) }
it { is_expected.to validate_presence_of(:user) }
it { is_expected.to validate_presence_of(:name) }
# To circumvent a bug in the shoulda matchers
describe "scoped uniqueness validation" do
it "rejects duplicate award emoji" do
user = create(:user)
issue = create(:issue)
create(:award_emoji, user: user, awardable: issue)
new_award = build(:award_emoji, user: user, awardable: issue)
expect(new_award).not_to be_valid
end
# Assume User A and User B both created award emoji of the same name
# on the same awardable. When User A is deleted, User A's award emoji
# is moved to the ghost user. When User B is deleted, User B's award emoji
# also needs to be moved to the ghost user - this cannot happen unless
# the uniqueness validation is disabled for ghost users.
it "allows duplicate award emoji for ghost users" do
user = create(:user, :ghost)
issue = create(:issue)
create(:award_emoji, user: user, awardable: issue)
new_award = build(:award_emoji, user: user, awardable: issue)
expect(new_award).to be_valid
end
end
end
end
|