/* Test of flock() function. Copyright (C) 2008-2023 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this program. If not, see . */ #include #include #include "signature.h" SIGNATURE_CHECK (flock, int, (int, int)); #include #include #include #include "macros.h" static void test_shared (const char *file, int fd) { /* Should be able to acquire several shared locks on a file, through * different file table entries. */ int fd2, r; ASSERT (flock (fd, LOCK_SH) == 0); fd2 = open (file, O_RDWR, 0644); ASSERT (fd2 >= 0); r = flock (fd2, LOCK_SH | LOCK_NB); ASSERT (r == 0); /* Was able to acquire a second shared lock. */ ASSERT (flock (fd, LOCK_UN) == 0); ASSERT (close (fd2) == 0); } static void test_exclusive (const char *file, int fd) { /* Should not be able to acquire more than one exclusive lock on a file. */ int fd2, r; ASSERT (flock (fd, LOCK_EX) == 0); fd2 = open (file, O_RDWR, 0644); ASSERT (fd2 >= 0); r = flock (fd2, LOCK_EX | LOCK_NB); ASSERT (r == -1); /* Was unable to acquire a second exclusive lock. */ #if 0 /* The Linux manual page of flock(2) says: "A process may only hold one type of lock (shared or exclusive) on a file. Subsequent flock() calls on an already locked file will convert an existing lock to the new lock mode." So, the call below should convert the exclusive lock for fd to a shared and thus succeeds. The fact that it doesn't but instead fails is apparently a bug. */ /* The Solaris manual page of flock(2) says: "More than one process may hold a shared lock for a file at any given time, but multiple exclusive, or both shared and exclusive, locks may not exist simultaneously on a file. ... Requesting a lock on an object that is already locked normally causes the caller to block until the lock may be acquired. If LOCK_NB is included in operation, then this will not happen; instead, the call will fail and the error EWOULDBLOCK will be returned." So, the call below should fail and set errno to EWOULDBLOCK. The fact that it succeeds is apparently a bug. */ r = flock (fd2, LOCK_SH | LOCK_NB); ASSERT (r == -1); #endif ASSERT (flock (fd, LOCK_UN) == 0); ASSERT (close (fd2) == 0); } int main (int argc, char *argv[]) { int fd; const char *file = "test-flock.txt"; /* Open a non-empty file for testing. */ fd = open (file, O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_TRUNC, 0644); ASSERT (fd >= 0); ASSERT (write (fd, "hello", 5) == 5); #if defined __linux__ || defined __ANDROID__ /* Invalid operation codes are rejected by the Linux implementation and by the gnulib replacement, but not by the Mac OS X implementation. */ ASSERT (flock (fd, LOCK_SH | LOCK_EX) == -1); ASSERT (errno == EINVAL); ASSERT (flock (fd, LOCK_SH | LOCK_UN) == -1); ASSERT (errno == EINVAL); ASSERT (flock (fd, LOCK_EX | LOCK_UN) == -1); ASSERT (errno == EINVAL); ASSERT (flock (fd, 0) == -1); ASSERT (errno == EINVAL); #endif test_shared (file, fd); test_exclusive (file, fd); /* Close and remove the test file. */ ASSERT (close (fd) == 0); ASSERT (unlink (file) == 0); return 0; }