@node Internal architecture of GnuTLS
@chapter Internal Architecture of GnuTLS
@cindex internal architecture

This chapter is to give a brief description of the
way @acronym{GnuTLS} works. The focus is to give an idea
to potential developers and those who want to know what
happens inside the black box.

@menu
* The TLS Protocol::
* TLS Handshake Protocol::
* TLS Authentication Methods::
* TLS Extension Handling::
* Cryptographic Backend::
@end menu

@node The TLS Protocol
@section The TLS Protocol
The main use case for the TLS protocol is shown in @ref{fig:client-server}.
A user of a library implementing the protocol expects no less than this functionality,
i.e., to be able to set parameters such as the accepted security level, perform a
negotiation with the peer and be able to exchange data.

@float Figure,fig:client-server
@image{gnutls-client-server-use-case,9cm}
@caption{TLS protocol use case.}
@end float

@node TLS Handshake Protocol
@section TLS Handshake Protocol
The @acronym{GnuTLS} handshake protocol is implemented as a state
machine that waits for input or returns immediately when the non-blocking
transport layer functions are used. The main idea is shown in @ref{fig:gnutls-handshake}.

@float Figure,fig:gnutls-handshake
@image{gnutls-handshake-state,9cm}
@caption{GnuTLS handshake state machine.}
@end float

Also the way the input is processed varies per ciphersuite. Several 
implementations of the internal handlers are available and 
@funcref{gnutls_handshake} only multiplexes the input to the appropriate 
handler. For example a @acronym{PSK} ciphersuite has a different 
implementation of the @code{process_client_key_exchange} than a
certificate ciphersuite. We illustrate the idea in @ref{fig:gnutls-handshake-sequence}.

@float Figure,fig:gnutls-handshake-sequence
@image{gnutls-handshake-sequence,12cm}
@caption{GnuTLS handshake process sequence.}
@end float

@node TLS Authentication Methods
@section TLS Authentication Methods
In @acronym{GnuTLS} authentication methods can be implemented quite
easily.  Since the required changes to add a new authentication method
affect only the handshake protocol, a simple interface is used. An
authentication method needs to implement the functions shown below.

@verbatim
typedef struct 
{
  const char *name;
  int (*gnutls_generate_server_certificate) (gnutls_session_t, gnutls_buffer_st*);
  int (*gnutls_generate_client_certificate) (gnutls_session_t, gnutls_buffer_st*);
  int (*gnutls_generate_server_kx) (gnutls_session_t, gnutls_buffer_st*);
  int (*gnutls_generate_client_kx) (gnutls_session_t, gnutls_buffer_st*);
  int (*gnutls_generate_client_cert_vrfy) (gnutls_session_t, gnutls_buffer_st *);
  int (*gnutls_generate_server_certificate_request) (gnutls_session_t,
                                                     gnutls_buffer_st *);

  int (*gnutls_process_server_certificate) (gnutls_session_t, opaque *,
                                            size_t);
  int (*gnutls_process_client_certificate) (gnutls_session_t, opaque *,
                                            size_t);
  int (*gnutls_process_server_kx) (gnutls_session_t, opaque *, size_t);
  int (*gnutls_process_client_kx) (gnutls_session_t, opaque *, size_t);
  int (*gnutls_process_client_cert_vrfy) (gnutls_session_t, opaque *, size_t);
  int (*gnutls_process_server_certificate_request) (gnutls_session_t,
                                                    opaque *, size_t);
} mod_auth_st;
@end verbatim

Those functions are responsible for the
interpretation of the handshake protocol messages. It is common for such
functions to read data from one or more @code{credentials_t}
structures@footnote{such as the
@code{gnutls_certificate_credentials_t} structures} and write data,
such as certificates, usernames etc. to @code{auth_info_t} structures.


Simple examples of existing authentication methods can be seen in
@code{auth/@-psk.c} for PSK ciphersuites and @code{auth/@-srp.c} for SRP
ciphersuites. After implementing these functions the structure holding
its pointers has to be registered in @code{gnutls_@-algorithms.c} in the
@code{_gnutls_@-kx_@-algorithms} structure.

@node TLS Extension Handling
@section TLS Extension Handling
As with authentication methods, the TLS extensions handlers can be
implemented using the interface shown below.

@verbatim
typedef int (*gnutls_ext_recv_func) (gnutls_session_t session,
                                     const unsigned char *data, size_t len);
typedef int (*gnutls_ext_send_func) (gnutls_session_t session,
                                     gnutls_buffer_st *extdata);
@end verbatim

Here there are two functions, one for receiving the extension data
and one for sending. These functions have to check internally whether
they operate in client or server side. 

A simple example of an extension handler can be seen in
@code{ext/@-srp.c} in GnuTLS' source code. After implementing these functions, 
together with the extension number they handle, they have to be registered 
using @funcintref{_gnutls_ext_register} in
@code{gnutls_extensions.c} typically within @funcintref{_gnutls_ext_init}.

@subsection Adding a New TLS Extension

Adding support for a new TLS extension is done from time to time, and
the process to do so is not difficult.  Here are the steps you need to
follow if you wish to do this yourself.  For sake of discussion, let's
consider adding support for the hypothetical TLS extension
@code{foobar}.

@subsubsection Add @code{configure} option like @code{--enable-foobar} or @code{--disable-foobar}.

This step is useful when the extension code is large and it might be desirable
to disable the extension under some circumstances. Otherwise it can be safely
skipped.

Whether to chose enable or disable depends on whether you intend to make the extension be
enabled by default.  Look at existing checks (i.e., SRP, authz) for
how to model the code.  For example:

@example
AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether to disable foobar support])
AC_ARG_ENABLE(foobar,
	AS_HELP_STRING([--disable-foobar],
		[disable foobar support]),
	ac_enable_foobar=no)
if test x$ac_enable_foobar != xno; then
 AC_MSG_RESULT(no)
 AC_DEFINE(ENABLE_FOOBAR, 1, [enable foobar])
else
 ac_full=0
 AC_MSG_RESULT(yes)
fi
AM_CONDITIONAL(ENABLE_FOOBAR, test "$ac_enable_foobar" != "no")
@end example

These lines should go in @code{lib/m4/hooks.m4}.

@subsubsection Add IANA extension value to @code{extensions_t} in @code{gnutls_int.h}.

A good name for the value would be GNUTLS_EXTENSION_FOOBAR.  Check
with @url{http://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-extensiontype-values}
for allocated values.  For experiments, you could pick a number but
remember that some consider it a bad idea to deploy such modified
version since it will lead to interoperability problems in the future
when the IANA allocates that number to someone else, or when the
foobar protocol is allocated another number.

@subsubsection Add an entry to @code{_gnutls_extensions} in @code{gnutls_extensions.c}.

A typical entry would be:

@example
  int ret;

#if ENABLE_FOOBAR
  ret = _gnutls_ext_register (&foobar_ext);
  if (ret != GNUTLS_E_SUCCESS)
    return ret;
#endif
@end example

Most likely you'll need to add an @code{#include "ext/@-foobar.h"}, that
will contain something like
like:
@example
  extension_entry_st foobar_ext = @{
    .name = "FOOBAR",
    .type = GNUTLS_EXTENSION_FOOBAR,
    .parse_type = GNUTLS_EXT_TLS,
    .recv_func = _foobar_recv_params,
    .send_func = _foobar_send_params,
    .pack_func = _foobar_pack,
    .unpack_func = _foobar_unpack,
    .deinit_func = NULL
  @}
@end example

The GNUTLS_EXTENSION_FOOBAR is the integer value you added to
@code{gnutls_int.h} earlier.  In this structure you specify the
functions to read the extension from the hello message, the function
to send the reply to, and two more functions to pack and unpack from
stored session data (e.g. when resumming a session). The @code{deinit} function
will be called to deinitialize the extension's private parameters, if any.

Note that the conditional @code{ENABLE_FOOBAR} definition should only be 
used if step 1 with the @code{configure} options has taken place.

@subsubsection Add new files  that implement the extension.

The functions you are responsible to add are those mentioned in the
previous step.  They should be added in a file such as @code{ext/@-foobar.c} 
and headers should be placed in @code{ext/@-foobar.h}.
As a starter, you could add this:

@example
int
_foobar_recv_params (gnutls_session_t session, const opaque * data,
                     size_t data_size)
@{
  return 0;
@}

int
_foobar_send_params (gnutls_session_t session, gnutls_buffer_st* data)
@{
  return 0;
@}

int
_foobar_pack (extension_priv_data_t epriv, gnutls_buffer_st * ps)
@{
   /* Append the extension's internal state to buffer */
   return 0;
@}

int
_foobar_unpack (gnutls_buffer_st * ps, extension_priv_data_t * epriv)
@{
   /* Read the internal state from buffer */
   return 0;
@}
@end example

The @funcintref{_foobar_recv_params} function is responsible for
parsing incoming extension data (both in the client and server).

The @funcintref{_foobar_send_params} function is responsible for
sending extension data (both in the client and server).

If you receive length fields that doesn't match, return
@code{GNUTLS_E_@-UNEXPECTED_@-PACKET_@-LENGTH}.  If you receive invalid
data, return @code{GNUTLS_E_@-RECEIVED_@-ILLEGAL_@-PARAMETER}.  You can use
other error codes from the list in @ref{Error codes}.  Return 0 on success.

An extension typically stores private information in the @code{session}
data for later usage. That can be done using the functions 
@funcintref{_gnutls_ext_set_session_data} and
@funcintref{_gnutls_ext_get_session_data}. You can check simple examples
at @code{ext/@-max_@-record.c} and @code{ext/@-server_@-name.c} extensions.
That private information can be saved and restored across session 
resumption if the following functions are set:

The @funcintref{_foobar_pack} function is responsible for packing
internal extension data to save them in the session resumption storage.

The @funcintref{_foobar_unpack} function is responsible for
restoring session data from the session resumption storage.

Recall that both the client and server, send and receive
parameters, and your code most likely will need to do different things
depending on which mode it is in.  It may be useful to make this
distinction explicit in the code.  Thus, for example, a better
template than above would be:

@example
int
_gnutls_foobar_recv_params (gnutls_session_t session,
                            const opaque * data,
                            size_t data_size)
@{
  if (session->security_parameters.entity == GNUTLS_CLIENT)
    return foobar_recv_client (session, data, data_size);
  else
    return foobar_recv_server (session, data, data_size);
@}

int
_gnutls_foobar_send_params (gnutls_session_t session,
                            gnutls_buffer_st * data)
@{
  if (session->security_parameters.entity == GNUTLS_CLIENT)
    return foobar_send_client (session, data);
  else
    return foobar_send_server (session, data);
@}
@end example

The functions used would be declared as @code{static} functions, of
the appropriate prototype, in the same file.
When adding the files, you'll need to add them to @code{ext/@-Makefile.am}
as well, for example:

@example
if ENABLE_FOOBAR
libgnutls_ext_la_SOURCES += ext/foobar.c ext/foobar.h
endif
@end example

@subsubsection Add API functions to enable/disable the extension.

It might be desirable to allow users of the extension to
request use of the extension, or set extension specific data.  
This can be implemented by adding extension specific function calls
that can be added to @code{includes/@-gnutls/@-gnutls.h},
as long as the LGPLv3+ applies.
The implementation of the function should lie in the @code{ext/@-foobar.c} file.

To make the API available in the shared library you need to add the
symbol in @code{lib/@-libgnutls.map}, so that the symbol
is exported properly.

When writing GTK-DOC style documentation for your new APIs, don't
forget to add @code{Since:} tags to indicate the GnuTLS version the
API was introduced in.

@node Cryptographic Backend
@section Cryptographic Backend
Today most new processors, either for embedded or desktop systems
include either instructions  intended to speed up cryptographic operations,
or a co-processor with cryptographic capabilities. Taking advantage of 
those is a challenging task for every cryptographic  application or 
library. Unfortunately the cryptographic library that GnuTLS is based 
on takes no advantage of these capabilities. For this reason GnuTLS handles 
this internally by following a layered approach to accessing
cryptographic operations as in @ref{fig:crypto-layers}.

@float Figure,fig:crypto-layers
@image{gnutls-crypto-layers,12cm}
@caption{GnuTLS cryptographic back-end design.}
@end float

The TLS layer uses a cryptographic provider layer, that will in turn either 
use the default crypto provider -- a software crypto library, or use an external
crypto provider, if available.

@subsection Cryptographic library layer
The Cryptographic library layer, currently supports only
libnettle. Other cryptographic libraries might be supported
in the future.

@subsection External cryptography provider
Systems that include a cryptographic co-processor, typically come with
kernel drivers to utilize the operations from software. For this reason 
GnuTLS provides a layer where each individual algorithm used can be replaced
by another implementation, i.e., the one provided by the driver. The
FreeBSD, OpenBSD and Linux kernels@footnote{Check @url{http://home.gna.org/cryptodev-linux/} 
for the Linux kernel implementation of @code{/dev/crypto}.} include already 
a number of hardware assisted implementations, and also provide an interface 
to access them, called @code{/dev/crypto}.
GnuTLS will take advantage of this interface if compiled with special
options. That is because in most systems where hardware-assisted 
cryptographic operations are not available, using this interface might 
actually harm performance.

In systems that include cryptographic instructions with the CPU's
instructions set, using the kernel interface will introduce an
unneeded layer. For this reason GnuTLS includes such optimizations
found in popular processors such as the AES-NI or VIA PADLOCK instruction sets.
This is achieved using a mechanism that detects CPU capabilities and
overrides parts of crypto backend at runtime.
The next section discusses the registration of a detected algorithm
optimization. For more information please consult the @acronym{GnuTLS}
source code in @code{lib/accelerated/}.

@subsubsection Overriding specific algorithms
When an optimized implementation of a single algorithm is available,
say a hardware assisted version of @acronym{AES-CBC} then the
following (internal) functions, from @code{crypto-backend.h}, can 
be used to register those algorithms.

@itemize

@item @code{gnutls_crypto_single_cipher_register}:
To register a cipher algorithm.

@item @code{gnutls_crypto_single_digest_register}:
To register a hash (digest) or MAC algorithm.

@end itemize

Those registration functions will only replace the specified algorithm
and leave the rest of subsystem intact.

@subsubsection Overriding the cryptographic library
In some systems, that might contain a broad acceleration engine, it 
might be desirable to override big parts of the cryptographic backend, 
or even all of them. T following functions are provided for this reason.

@itemize

@item @code{gnutls_crypto_cipher_register}:
To override the cryptographic algorithms backend.

@item @code{gnutls_crypto_digest_register}:
To override the digest algorithms backend.

@item @code{gnutls_crypto_rnd_register}:
To override the random number generator backend.

@item @code{gnutls_crypto_bigint_register}:
To override the big number number operations backend.

@item @code{gnutls_crypto_pk_register}:
To override the public key encryption backend. This is tied to the
big number operations so either none or both of them should be overriden.

@end itemize