tests: Use Regress GIR for doctool

This makes us test a lot more functionality in the doc tool, and
removes the need to have a lot of different test libraries, and
different test infrastructure.

1 files changed, 44 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/tests/scanner/Regress-1.0-C-expected/Regress.TestSubObj.instance_method.page b/tests/scanner/Regress-1.0-C-expected/Regress.TestSubObj.instance_method.page
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..d32c0de2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/scanner/Regress-1.0-C-expected/Regress.TestSubObj.instance_method.page
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+<?xml version="1.0"?>
+<page id="Regress.TestSubObj.instance_method"
+      type="topic"
+      style="method"
+      xmlns="http://projectmallard.org/1.0/"
+      xmlns:api="http://projectmallard.org/experimental/api/"
+      xmlns:ui="http://projectmallard.org/1.0/ui/">
+  <info>
+    
+    <link type="guide" xref="Regress.TestSubObj" group="method"/>
+    <api:function>
+      <api:returns>
+        <api:type>int</api:type>
+      </api:returns>
+      <api:name>regress_test_sub_obj_instance_method</api:name>
+      <api:arg>
+        <api:type>RegressTestSubObj*</api:type>
+        <api:name>obj</api:name>
+      </api:arg>
+    </api:function>
+
+  </info>
+  <title>regress_test_sub_obj_instance_method</title>
+  
+<synopsis><code mime="text/x-csrc">
+int regress_test_sub_obj_instance_method (RegressTestSubObj* obj);
+</code></synopsis>
+
+  
+    
+  
+  
+  
+  
+<dl>
+<dt><p>obj :</p></dt>
+<dd></dd>
+<dt><p>Returns :</p></dt>
+<dd></dd>
+</dl>
+
+  
+  
+</page>