diff options
author | Ryan Scott <ryan.gl.scott@gmail.com> | 2020-03-24 18:44:08 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ryan Scott <ryan.gl.scott@gmail.com> | 2020-03-24 18:44:28 -0400 |
commit | 5a775e62f1d8a5186e115a8ad958ad76714d3fc5 (patch) | |
tree | 59a3185a08652dd178dfe1bb009ba0a75f4d19da | |
parent | 2643ba465cd2a133b6f495f34fc59cd1a6d23525 (diff) | |
download | haskell-wip/T17955.tar.gz |
Run checkNewDataCon before constraint-solving newtype constructorswip/T17955
Within `checkValidDataCon`, we used to run `checkValidType` on the
argument types of a newtype constructor before running
`checkNewDataCon`, which ensures that the user does not attempt
non-sensical things such as newtypes with multiple arguments or
constraints. This works out in most situations, but this falls over
on a corner case revealed in #17955:
```hs
newtype T = Coercible () T => T ()
```
`checkValidType`, among other things, peforms an ambiguity check on
the context of a data constructor, and that it turn invokes the
constraint solver. It turns out that there is a special case in the
constraint solver for representational equalities (read: `Coercible`
constraints) that causes newtypes to be unwrapped (see
`Note [Unwrap newtypes first]` in `TcCanonical`). This special case
does not know how to cope with an ill formed newtype like `T`, so
it ends up panicking.
The solution is surprisingly simple: just invoke `checkNewDataCon`
before `checkValidType` to ensure that the illicit newtype
constructor context is detected before the constraint solver can
run amok with it.
Fixes #17955.
-rw-r--r-- | compiler/typecheck/TcTyClsDecls.hs | 12 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T17955.hs | 6 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T17955.stderr | 6 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/all.T | 1 |
4 files changed, 21 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/compiler/typecheck/TcTyClsDecls.hs b/compiler/typecheck/TcTyClsDecls.hs index e85f471432..05a2a433a9 100644 --- a/compiler/typecheck/TcTyClsDecls.hs +++ b/compiler/typecheck/TcTyClsDecls.hs @@ -3992,9 +3992,6 @@ checkValidDataCon dflags existential_ok tc con -- Reason: it's really the argument of an equality constraint ; checkValidMonoType orig_res_ty - -- Check all argument types for validity - ; checkValidType ctxt (dataConUserType con) - -- If we are dealing with a newtype, we allow levity polymorphism -- regardless of whether or not UnliftedNewtypes is enabled. A -- later check in checkNewDataCon handles this, producing a @@ -4002,9 +3999,16 @@ checkValidDataCon dflags existential_ok tc con ; unless (isNewTyCon tc) (mapM_ (checkForLevPoly empty) (dataConOrigArgTys con)) - -- Extra checks for newtype data constructors + -- Extra checks for newtype data constructors. Importantly, these + -- checks /must/ come before the call to checkValidType below. This + -- is because checkValidType invokes the constraint solver, and + -- invoking the solver on an ill formed newtype constructor can + -- confuse GHC to the point of panicking. See #17955 for an example. ; when (isNewTyCon tc) (checkNewDataCon con) + -- Check all argument types for validity + ; checkValidType ctxt (dataConUserType con) + -- Check that existentials are allowed if they are used ; checkTc (existential_ok || isVanillaDataCon con) (badExistential con) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T17955.hs b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T17955.hs new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..1bcb9a6d90 --- /dev/null +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T17955.hs @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +{-# LANGUAGE FlexibleContexts #-} +module T17955 where + +import Data.Coerce + +newtype T = Coercible () T => T () diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T17955.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T17955.stderr new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..0762facf45 --- /dev/null +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T17955.stderr @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ + +T17955.hs:6:13: error: + • A newtype constructor cannot have a context in its type + T :: Coercible () T => () -> T + • In the definition of data constructor ‘T’ + In the newtype declaration for ‘T’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/all.T b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/all.T index 60e50ca241..1c2e55624a 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/all.T +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/all.T @@ -557,3 +557,4 @@ test('T17566c', normal, compile_fail, ['']) test('T17773', normal, compile_fail, ['']) test('T17021', normal, compile_fail, ['']) test('T17021b', normal, compile_fail, ['']) +test('T17955', normal, compile_fail, ['']) |