summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSebastian Graf <sebastian.graf@kit.edu>2020-03-30 21:41:27 +0200
committerSebastian Graf <sebastian.graf@kit.edu>2020-03-31 12:02:22 +0200
commited58d4fdcbc7b4fa8fbdf3d638a8d53c444ef4f2 (patch)
tree531fe940548b99d5fb650672b348b5f8508feded
parentf024b6e385bd1448968b7bf20de05f655c815bae (diff)
downloadhaskell-wip/T17977.tar.gz
PmCheck: Adjust recursion depth for inhabitation testwip/T17977
In #17977, we ran into the reduction depth limit of the typechecker. That was only a symptom of a much broader issue: The recursion depth of the coverage checker for trying to instantiate strict fields in the `nonVoid` test was far too high (100, the `defaultMaxTcBound`). As a result, we were performing quite poorly on `T17977`. Short of a proper termination analysis to prove emptyness of a type, we just arbitrarily default to a much lower recursion limit of 3. Fixes #17977.
-rw-r--r--compiler/GHC/HsToCore/PmCheck/Oracle.hs42
-rw-r--r--testsuite/tests/pmcheck/should_compile/T17977.hs33
-rw-r--r--testsuite/tests/pmcheck/should_compile/T17977b.hs24
-rw-r--r--testsuite/tests/pmcheck/should_compile/T17977b.stderr4
-rw-r--r--testsuite/tests/pmcheck/should_compile/all.T4
5 files changed, 98 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/compiler/GHC/HsToCore/PmCheck/Oracle.hs b/compiler/GHC/HsToCore/PmCheck/Oracle.hs
index 67d10628dc..a4d849c910 100644
--- a/compiler/GHC/HsToCore/PmCheck/Oracle.hs
+++ b/compiler/GHC/HsToCore/PmCheck/Oracle.hs
@@ -1319,10 +1319,11 @@ checkAllNonVoid :: RecTcChecker -> Delta -> [Type] -> DsM Bool
checkAllNonVoid rec_ts amb_cs strict_arg_tys = do
let definitely_inhabited = definitelyInhabitedType (delta_ty_st amb_cs)
tys_to_check <- filterOutM definitely_inhabited strict_arg_tys
+ -- See Note [Fuel for the inhabitation test]
let rec_max_bound | tys_to_check `lengthExceeds` 1
= 1
| otherwise
- = defaultRecTcMaxBound
+ = 3
rec_ts' = setRecTcMaxBound rec_max_bound rec_ts
allM (nonVoid rec_ts' amb_cs) tys_to_check
@@ -1342,6 +1343,7 @@ nonVoid rec_ts amb_cs strict_arg_ty = do
mb_cands <- inhabitationCandidates amb_cs strict_arg_ty
case mb_cands of
Right (tc, _, cands)
+ -- See Note [Fuel for the inhabitation test]
| Just rec_ts' <- checkRecTc rec_ts tc
-> anyM (cand_is_inhabitable rec_ts' amb_cs) cands
-- A strict argument type is inhabitable by a terminating value if
@@ -1390,7 +1392,7 @@ definitelyInhabitedType ty_st ty = do
null (dataConImplBangs con) -- (2)
{- Note [Strict argument type constraints]
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In the ConVar case of clause processing, each conlike K traditionally
generates two different forms of constraints:
@@ -1420,6 +1422,7 @@ say, `K2 undefined` or `K2 (let x = x in x)`.)
Since neither the term nor type constraints mentioned above take strict
argument types into account, we make use of the `nonVoid` function to
determine whether a strict type is inhabitable by a terminating value or not.
+We call this the "inhabitation test".
`nonVoid ty` returns True when either:
1. `ty` has at least one InhabitationCandidate for which both its term and type
@@ -1445,15 +1448,20 @@ determine whether a strict type is inhabitable by a terminating value or not.
`nonVoid MyVoid` returns False. The InhabitationCandidate for the MkMyVoid
constructor contains Void as a strict argument type, and since `nonVoid Void`
returns False, that InhabitationCandidate is discarded, leaving no others.
+* Whether or not a type is inhabited is undecidable in general.
+ See Note [Fuel for the inhabitation test].
+* For some types, inhabitation is evident immediately and we don't need to
+ perform expensive tests. See Note [Types that are definitely inhabitable].
-* Performance considerations
+Note [Fuel for the inhabitation test]
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+Whether or not a type is inhabited is undecidable in general. As a result, we
+can run into infinite loops in `nonVoid`. Therefore, we adopt a fuel-based
+approach to prevent that.
-We must be careful when recursively calling `nonVoid` on the strict argument
-types of an InhabitationCandidate, because doing so naïvely can cause GHC to
-fall into an infinite loop. Consider the following example:
+Consider the following example:
data Abyss = MkAbyss !Abyss
-
stareIntoTheAbyss :: Abyss -> a
stareIntoTheAbyss x = case x of {}
@@ -1474,7 +1482,6 @@ stareIntoTheAbyss above. Then again, the same problem occurs with recursive
newtypes, like in the following code:
newtype Chasm = MkChasm Chasm
-
gazeIntoTheChasm :: Chasm -> a
gazeIntoTheChasm x = case x of {} -- Erroneously warned as non-exhaustive
@@ -1498,9 +1505,26 @@ maximum recursion depth to 1 to mitigate the problem. If the branching factor
is exactly 1 (i.e., we have a linear chain instead of a tree), then it's okay
to stick with a larger maximum recursion depth.
+In #17977 we saw that the defaultRecTcMaxBound (100 at the time of writing) was
+too large and had detrimental effect on performance of the coverage checker.
+Given that we only commit to a best effort anyway, we decided to substantially
+decrement the recursion depth to 3, at the cost of precision in some edge cases
+like
+
+ data Nat = Z | S Nat
+ data Down :: Nat -> Type where
+ Down :: !(Down n) -> Down (S n)
+ f :: Down (S (S (S (S (S Z))))) -> ()
+ f x = case x of {}
+
+Since the coverage won't bother to instantiate Down 4 levels deep to see that it
+is in fact uninhabited, it will emit a inexhaustivity warning for the case.
+
+Note [Types that are definitely inhabitable]
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Another microoptimization applies to data types like this one:
- data S a = ![a] !T
+ data S a = S ![a] !T
Even though there is a strict field of type [a], it's quite silly to call
nonVoid on it, since it's "obvious" that it is inhabitable. To make this
diff --git a/testsuite/tests/pmcheck/should_compile/T17977.hs b/testsuite/tests/pmcheck/should_compile/T17977.hs
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..4905989ead
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testsuite/tests/pmcheck/should_compile/T17977.hs
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+{-# LANGUAGE DataKinds #-}
+{-# LANGUAGE GADTs #-}
+{-# LANGUAGE ScopedTypeVariables #-}
+{-# LANGUAGE TypeFamilies #-}
+{-# LANGUAGE TypeOperators #-}
+{-# LANGUAGE UndecidableInstances #-}
+module Bug where
+
+import Data.Kind
+import Data.Type.Equality
+
+data Nat = Z | S Nat
+
+data SNat :: Nat -> Type where
+ SZ :: SNat Z
+ SS :: SNat n -> SNat (S n)
+
+type family S' (n :: Nat) :: Nat where
+ S' n = S n
+
+data R :: Nat -> Nat -> Nat -> Type where
+ MkR :: !(R m n o) -> R (S m) n (S o)
+
+type family NatPlus (m :: Nat) (n :: Nat) :: Nat where
+ NatPlus Z n = n
+ NatPlus (S m) n = S' (NatPlus m n)
+
+f :: forall (m :: Nat) (n :: Nat) (o :: Nat).
+ SNat m -> SNat n -> SNat o
+ -> R m n o -> NatPlus m n :~: o
+f (SS sm) sn (SS so) (MkR r)
+ | Refl <- f sm sn so r
+ = Refl
diff --git a/testsuite/tests/pmcheck/should_compile/T17977b.hs b/testsuite/tests/pmcheck/should_compile/T17977b.hs
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..c6b81f5439
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testsuite/tests/pmcheck/should_compile/T17977b.hs
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+{-# LANGUAGE DataKinds #-}
+{-# LANGUAGE GADTs #-}
+{-# LANGUAGE KindSignatures #-}
+{-# LANGUAGE EmptyCase #-}
+module Bug where
+
+import Data.Kind
+
+data Nat = Z | S Nat
+
+data Down :: Nat -> Type where
+ Down :: !(Down n) -> Down (S n)
+
+data Up :: Nat -> Type where
+ Up :: !(Up (S n)) -> Up n
+
+f :: Down n -> ()
+f (Down r) = ()
+
+f' :: Down (S (S (S (S Z)))) -> ()
+f' (Down r) = ()
+
+g :: Up n -> ()
+g (Up r) = ()
diff --git a/testsuite/tests/pmcheck/should_compile/T17977b.stderr b/testsuite/tests/pmcheck/should_compile/T17977b.stderr
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..d46492db22
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testsuite/tests/pmcheck/should_compile/T17977b.stderr
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+
+T17977b.hs:21:1: warning: [-Woverlapping-patterns (in -Wdefault)]
+ Pattern match has inaccessible right hand side
+ In an equation for ‘f'’: f' (Down r) = ...
diff --git a/testsuite/tests/pmcheck/should_compile/all.T b/testsuite/tests/pmcheck/should_compile/all.T
index 6295fa77ab..0c3bfcf510 100644
--- a/testsuite/tests/pmcheck/should_compile/all.T
+++ b/testsuite/tests/pmcheck/should_compile/all.T
@@ -114,6 +114,10 @@ test('T17703', normal, compile,
['-fwarn-incomplete-patterns -fwarn-overlapping-patterns'])
test('T17783', normal, compile,
['-fwarn-incomplete-patterns -fwarn-overlapping-patterns'])
+test('T17977', collect_compiler_stats('bytes allocated',10), compile,
+ ['-fwarn-incomplete-patterns -fwarn-overlapping-patterns'])
+test('T17977b', collect_compiler_stats('bytes allocated',10), compile,
+ ['-fwarn-incomplete-patterns -fwarn-overlapping-patterns'])
# Other tests
test('pmc001', [], compile,