summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSebastian Graf <sebastian.graf@kit.edu>2021-10-21 17:17:45 +0200
committerSebastian Graf <sebastian.graf@kit.edu>2021-10-21 17:17:45 +0200
commitcdba10d1ca94e4581d318ced123b9851db434abd (patch)
tree43b2edaf94640d2e27e01a4a2fa2b13f9cf7fc80
parentf6f245152bb90de811213b4f724c9bf2f52a602b (diff)
downloadhaskell-wip/T20539.tar.gz
WorkWrap: `isRecDataCon` should not eta-reduce NewTyCon field tys (#20539)wip/T20539
In #20539 we had a type ```hs newtype Measured a = Measured { unmeasure :: () -> a } ``` and `isRecDataCon Measured` recursed into `go_arg_ty` for `(->) ()`, because `unwrapNewTyConEtad_maybe` eta-reduced it. That triggered an assertion error a bit later. Eta reducing the field type is completely wrong to do here! Just call `unwrapNewTyCon_maybe` instead. Fixes #20539 and adds a regression test T20539.
-rw-r--r--compiler/GHC/Core/Opt/WorkWrap/Utils.hs4
-rw-r--r--testsuite/tests/cpranal/should_compile/T20539.hs7
-rw-r--r--testsuite/tests/cpranal/should_compile/all.T2
3 files changed, 11 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/compiler/GHC/Core/Opt/WorkWrap/Utils.hs b/compiler/GHC/Core/Opt/WorkWrap/Utils.hs
index df3608fe7d..38c103d866 100644
--- a/compiler/GHC/Core/Opt/WorkWrap/Utils.hs
+++ b/compiler/GHC/Core/Opt/WorkWrap/Utils.hs
@@ -1333,6 +1333,8 @@ isRecDataCon fam_envs fuel dc
go_arg_ty :: IntWithInf -> RecTcChecker -> Type -> IsRecDataConResult
go_arg_ty fuel rec_tc ty
+ --- | pprTrace "arg_ty" (ppr ty) False = undefined
+
| Just (_, _arg_ty, _res_ty) <- splitFunTy_maybe ty
-- = go_arg_ty fuel rec_tc _arg_ty <||> go_arg_ty fuel rec_tc _res_ty
-- Plausible, but unnecessary for CPR.
@@ -1382,7 +1384,7 @@ isRecDataCon fam_envs fuel dc
-- we expanded this TyCon once already, no need to test it multiple times
Just rec_tc'
- | Just (_tvs, rhs, _co) <- unwrapNewTyConEtad_maybe tc
+ | Just (_tvs, rhs, _co) <- unwrapNewTyCon_maybe tc
-- See Note [Detecting recursive data constructors], points (2) and (3)
-> go_arg_ty fuel rec_tc' rhs
diff --git a/testsuite/tests/cpranal/should_compile/T20539.hs b/testsuite/tests/cpranal/should_compile/T20539.hs
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..a2943cf91e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testsuite/tests/cpranal/should_compile/T20539.hs
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+module T20593 where
+
+newtype Measured a = Measured { unmeasure :: () -> a }
+data Subdiagram = Subdiagram () (Measured ())
+
+mkSubdiagram :: () -> Subdiagram
+mkSubdiagram d = Subdiagram d (Measured (\_ -> ()))
diff --git a/testsuite/tests/cpranal/should_compile/all.T b/testsuite/tests/cpranal/should_compile/all.T
index 03d2b10d68..f33b43fe3a 100644
--- a/testsuite/tests/cpranal/should_compile/all.T
+++ b/testsuite/tests/cpranal/should_compile/all.T
@@ -21,4 +21,4 @@ test('T18401', [ grep_errmsg(r'^T18401\.\S+ ::') ], compile, ['-ddump-simpl -dsu
# It won't match if the Cpr=1 is missing, which is what we're trying to assess.
test('T18824', [ grep_errmsg(r'JoinId[^\n]*Cpr') ], compile, ['-ddump-exitify -dppr-cols=1000 -dsuppress-uniques'])
-
+test('T20539', [], compile, ['']) # simply should not crash