summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorVladislav Zavialov <vlad.z.4096@gmail.com>2019-02-22 16:51:48 +0300
committerMarge Bot <ben+marge-bot@smart-cactus.org>2019-02-23 22:14:19 -0500
commitae7d1ff62f61e2ded772d4c58cda3c130bbdcf78 (patch)
tree6d5466a0aef0398bbb67f7fb133b000358d23b49
parent88970187779166abd9c13b6e48430bfccc9ee880 (diff)
downloadhaskell-ae7d1ff62f61e2ded772d4c58cda3c130bbdcf78.tar.gz
User's Guide: forall is a keyword nowadays
-rw-r--r--docs/users_guide/bugs.rst7
-rw-r--r--docs/users_guide/glasgow_exts.rst10
2 files changed, 11 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/docs/users_guide/bugs.rst b/docs/users_guide/bugs.rst
index 96cdd25f5a..c563083cd6 100644
--- a/docs/users_guide/bugs.rst
+++ b/docs/users_guide/bugs.rst
@@ -42,6 +42,13 @@ Lexical syntax
as a single qualified operator rather than the two lexemes ``M`` and
``.\``.
+- ``forall`` is always a reserved keyword at the type level, contrary
+ to the Haskell Report, which allows type variables to be named ``forall``.
+ Note that this does not imply that GHC always enables the
+ :ghc-flag:`-XExplicitForAll` extension. Even without this extension enabled,
+ reserving ``forall`` as a keyword has significance. For instance, GHC will
+ not parse the type signature ``foo :: forall x``.
+
.. _infelicities-syntax:
Context-free syntax
diff --git a/docs/users_guide/glasgow_exts.rst b/docs/users_guide/glasgow_exts.rst
index c8afa44cdc..eae0283f6c 100644
--- a/docs/users_guide/glasgow_exts.rst
+++ b/docs/users_guide/glasgow_exts.rst
@@ -2236,9 +2236,10 @@ The following syntax is stolen:
.. index::
single: forall
- Stolen (in types) by: :extension:`ExplicitForAll`, and hence by
- :extension:`ScopedTypeVariables`, :extension:`LiberalTypeSynonyms`,
- :extension:`RankNTypes`, :extension:`ExistentialQuantification`
+ Stolen (in types) by default (see :ref:`infelicities-lexical`). ``forall`` is
+ a reserved keyword and never a type variable, in accordance with `GHC Proposal #43
+ <https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/blob/master/proposals/0043-forall-keyword.rst>`__.
+
``mdo``
.. index::
@@ -10105,9 +10106,6 @@ in :ref:`data-instance-declarations`, :ref:`type-instance-declarations`,
Notes:
-- With :extension:`ExplicitForAll`, ``forall`` becomes a keyword; you can't use ``forall`` as a
- type variable any more!
-
- As well in type signatures, you can also use an explicit ``forall``
in an instance declaration: ::