diff options
author | Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj@microsoft.com> | 2020-10-19 16:52:47 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Marge Bot <ben+marge-bot@smart-cactus.org> | 2020-10-27 14:02:34 -0400 |
commit | 0b3d23afcad8bc14f2ba69b8dbe05c314e6e7b29 (patch) | |
tree | 1851c76146d7de2e96d367213ec1cb7d2e134aaa /compiler | |
parent | f3d8ab2ef6ffe30ec91c795e0223392dd96ea61a (diff) | |
download | haskell-0b3d23afcad8bc14f2ba69b8dbe05c314e6e7b29.tar.gz |
Fix two constraint solving problems
This patch fixes two problems in the constraint solver.
* An actual bug #18555: we were floating out a constraint to eagerly,
and that was ultimately fatal. It's explained in
Note [Do not float blocked constraints] in GHC.Core.Constraint.
This is all very delicate, but it's all going to become irrelevant
when we stop floating constraints (#17656).
* A major performance infelicity in the flattener. When flattening
(ty |> co) we *never* generated Refl, even when there was nothing
at all to do. Result: we would gratuitously rewrite the constraint
to exactly the same thing, wasting work. Described in #18413, and
came up again in #18855.
Solution: exploit the special case by calling the new function
castCoercionKind1. See Note [castCoercionKind1] in
GHC.Core.Coercion
Diffstat (limited to 'compiler')
-rw-r--r-- | compiler/GHC/Core/Coercion.hs | 60 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | compiler/GHC/Core/FamInstEnv.hs | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | compiler/GHC/Core/TyCo/Rep.hs | 52 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | compiler/GHC/Core/Unify.hs | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | compiler/GHC/Tc/Solver.hs | 24 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | compiler/GHC/Tc/Solver/Flatten.hs | 6 |
6 files changed, 102 insertions, 44 deletions
diff --git a/compiler/GHC/Core/Coercion.hs b/compiler/GHC/Core/Coercion.hs index 401eed8edb..56d8938886 100644 --- a/compiler/GHC/Core/Coercion.hs +++ b/compiler/GHC/Core/Coercion.hs @@ -42,7 +42,8 @@ module GHC.Core.Coercion ( mkAxiomInstCo, mkProofIrrelCo, downgradeRole, mkAxiomRuleCo, mkGReflRightCo, mkGReflLeftCo, mkCoherenceLeftCo, mkCoherenceRightCo, - mkKindCo, castCoercionKind, castCoercionKindI, + mkKindCo, + castCoercionKind, castCoercionKind1, castCoercionKind2, mkFamilyTyConAppCo, mkHeteroCoercionType, @@ -1513,24 +1514,44 @@ instCoercions g ws ; return (piResultTy <$> g_tys <*> w_tys, g') } -- | Creates a new coercion with both of its types casted by different casts --- @castCoercionKind g r t1 t2 h1 h2@, where @g :: t1 ~r t2@, +-- @castCoercionKind2 g r t1 t2 h1 h2@, where @g :: t1 ~r t2@, -- has type @(t1 |> h1) ~r (t2 |> h2)@. -- @h1@ and @h2@ must be nominal. -castCoercionKind :: Coercion -> Role -> Type -> Type +castCoercionKind2 :: Coercion -> Role -> Type -> Type -> CoercionN -> CoercionN -> Coercion -castCoercionKind g r t1 t2 h1 h2 +castCoercionKind2 g r t1 t2 h1 h2 = mkCoherenceRightCo r t2 h2 (mkCoherenceLeftCo r t1 h1 g) +-- | @castCoercionKind1 g r t1 t2 h@ = @coercionKind g r t1 t2 h h@ +-- That is, it's a specialised form of castCoercionKind, where the two +-- kind coercions are identical +-- @castCoercionKind1 g r t1 t2 h@, where @g :: t1 ~r t2@, +-- has type @(t1 |> h) ~r (t2 |> h)@. +-- @h@ must be nominal. +-- See Note [castCoercionKind1] +castCoercionKind1 :: Coercion -> Role -> Type -> Type + -> CoercionN -> Coercion +castCoercionKind1 g r t1 t2 h + = case g of + Refl {} -> ASSERT( r == Nominal ) -- Refl is always Nominal + mkNomReflCo (mkCastTy t2 h) + GRefl _ _ mco -> case mco of + MRefl -> mkReflCo r (mkCastTy t2 h) + MCo kind_co -> GRefl r (mkCastTy t1 h) $ + MCo (mkSymCo h `mkTransCo` kind_co `mkTransCo` h) + _ -> castCoercionKind2 g r t1 t2 h h + -- | Creates a new coercion with both of its types casted by different casts -- @castCoercionKind g h1 h2@, where @g :: t1 ~r t2@, -- has type @(t1 |> h1) ~r (t2 |> h2)@. -- @h1@ and @h2@ must be nominal. -- It calls @coercionKindRole@, so it's quite inefficient (which 'I' stands for) --- Use @castCoercionKind@ instead if @t1@, @t2@, and @r@ are known beforehand. -castCoercionKindI :: Coercion -> CoercionN -> CoercionN -> Coercion -castCoercionKindI g h1 h2 - = mkCoherenceRightCo r t2 h2 (mkCoherenceLeftCo r t1 h1 g) - where (Pair t1 t2, r) = coercionKindRole g +-- Use @castCoercionKind2@ instead if @t1@, @t2@, and @r@ are known beforehand. +castCoercionKind :: Coercion -> CoercionN -> CoercionN -> Coercion +castCoercionKind g h1 h2 + = castCoercionKind2 g r t1 t2 h1 h2 + where + (Pair t1 t2, r) = coercionKindRole g mkFamilyTyConAppCo :: TyCon -> [CoercionN] -> CoercionN -- ^ Given a family instance 'TyCon' and its arg 'Coercion's, return the @@ -1592,6 +1613,23 @@ mkCoCast c g (tc, _) = splitTyConApp (coercionLKind g) co_list = decomposeCo (tyConArity tc) g (tyConRolesRepresentational tc) +{- Note [castCoercionKind1] +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +castCoercionKind1 deals with the very important special case of castCoercionKind2 +where the two kind coercions are identical. In that case we can exploit the +situation where the main coercion is reflexive, via the special cases for Refl +and GRefl. + +This is important when flattening (ty |> co). We flatten ty, yielding + fco :: ty ~ ty' +and now we want a coercion xco between + xco :: (ty |> co) ~ (ty' |> co) +That's exactly what castCoercionKind1 does. And it's very very common for +fco to be Refl. In that case we do NOT want to get some terrible composition +of mkLeftCoherenceCo and mkRightCoherenceCo, which is what castCoercionKind2 +has to do in its full generality. See #18413. +-} + {- %************************************************************************ %* * @@ -1967,8 +2005,8 @@ ty_co_subst !lc role ty else pprPanic "ty_co_subst: covar is not almost devoid" (ppr t) go r ty@(LitTy {}) = ASSERT( r == Nominal ) mkNomReflCo ty - go r (CastTy ty co) = castCoercionKindI (go r ty) (substLeftCo lc co) - (substRightCo lc co) + go r (CastTy ty co) = castCoercionKind (go r ty) (substLeftCo lc co) + (substRightCo lc co) go r (CoercionTy co) = mkProofIrrelCo r kco (substLeftCo lc co) (substRightCo lc co) where kco = go Nominal (coercionType co) diff --git a/compiler/GHC/Core/FamInstEnv.hs b/compiler/GHC/Core/FamInstEnv.hs index 8b9af440cc..1331602c08 100644 --- a/compiler/GHC/Core/FamInstEnv.hs +++ b/compiler/GHC/Core/FamInstEnv.hs @@ -1447,7 +1447,7 @@ normalise_type ty = do { (nco, nty) <- go ty ; lc <- getLC ; let co' = substRightCo lc co - ; return (castCoercionKind nco Nominal ty nty co co' + ; return (castCoercionKind2 nco Nominal ty nty co co' , mkCastTy nty co') } go (CoercionTy co) = do { lc <- getLC diff --git a/compiler/GHC/Core/TyCo/Rep.hs b/compiler/GHC/Core/TyCo/Rep.hs index 9503ba4ccf..4b81a39d75 100644 --- a/compiler/GHC/Core/TyCo/Rep.hs +++ b/compiler/GHC/Core/TyCo/Rep.hs @@ -1134,18 +1134,10 @@ data Coercion -- These ones mirror the shape of types = -- Refl :: _ -> N + -- A special case reflexivity for a very common case: Nominal reflexivity + -- If you need Representational, use (GRefl Representational ty MRefl) + -- not (SubCo (Refl ty)) Refl Type -- See Note [Refl invariant] - -- Invariant: applications of (Refl T) to a bunch of identity coercions - -- always show up as Refl. - -- For example (Refl T) (Refl a) (Refl b) shows up as (Refl (T a b)). - - -- Applications of (Refl T) to some coercions, at least one of - -- which is NOT the identity, show up as TyConAppCo. - -- (They may not be fully saturated however.) - -- ConAppCo coercions (like all coercions other than Refl) - -- are NEVER the identity. - - -- Use (GRefl Representational ty MRefl), not (SubCo (Refl ty)) -- GRefl :: "e" -> _ -> Maybe N -> e -- See Note [Generalized reflexive coercion] @@ -1254,26 +1246,30 @@ instance Outputable MCoercion where ppr MRefl = text "MRefl" ppr (MCo co) = text "MCo" <+> ppr co -{- -Note [Refl invariant] -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -Invariant 1: - -Coercions have the following invariant - Refl (similar for GRefl r ty MRefl) is always lifted as far as possible. - -You might think that a consequences is: - Every identity coercions has Refl at the root - -But that's not quite true because of coercion variables. Consider - g where g :: Int~Int - Left h where h :: Maybe Int ~ Maybe Int -etc. So the consequence is only true of coercions that -have no coercion variables. +{- Note [Refl invariant] +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +Invariant 1: Refl lifting + Refl (similar for GRefl r ty MRefl) is always lifted as far as possible. + For example + (Refl T) (Refl a) (Refl b) is normalised (by mkAPpCo) to (Refl (T a b)). + + You might think that a consequences is: + Every identity coercion has Refl at the root + + But that's not quite true because of coercion variables. Consider + g where g :: Int~Int + Left h where h :: Maybe Int ~ Maybe Int + etc. So the consequence is only true of coercions that + have no coercion variables. + +Invariant 2: TyConAppCo + An application of (Refl T) to some coercions, at least one of which is + NOT the identity, is normalised to TyConAppCo. (They may not be + fully saturated however.) TyConAppCo coercions (like all coercions + other than Refl) are NEVER the identity. Note [Generalized reflexive coercion] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - GRefl is a generalized reflexive coercion (see #15192). It wraps a kind coercion, which might be reflexive (MRefl) or any coercion (MCo co). The typing rules for GRefl: diff --git a/compiler/GHC/Core/Unify.hs b/compiler/GHC/Core/Unify.hs index 37b30629d5..0bbc844189 100644 --- a/compiler/GHC/Core/Unify.hs +++ b/compiler/GHC/Core/Unify.hs @@ -1454,7 +1454,7 @@ ty_co_match menv subst (TyVarTy tv1) co lkco rkco = if any (inRnEnvR rn_env) (tyCoVarsOfCoList co) then Nothing -- occurs check failed else Just $ extendVarEnv subst tv1' $ - castCoercionKindI co (mkSymCo lkco) (mkSymCo rkco) + castCoercionKind co (mkSymCo lkco) (mkSymCo rkco) | otherwise = Nothing diff --git a/compiler/GHC/Tc/Solver.hs b/compiler/GHC/Tc/Solver.hs index ab1e6d56d3..7f4bcdf871 100644 --- a/compiler/GHC/Tc/Solver.hs +++ b/compiler/GHC/Tc/Solver.hs @@ -2542,6 +2542,9 @@ floatEqualities skols given_ids ev_binds_var no_given_eqs is_float_eq_candidate ct | pred <- ctPred ct , EqPred NomEq ty1 ty2 <- classifyPredType pred + , case ct of + CIrredCan {} -> False -- See Note [Do not float blocked constraints] + _ -> True -- See #18855 = float_eq ty1 ty2 || float_eq ty2 ty1 | otherwise = False @@ -2552,7 +2555,26 @@ floatEqualities skols given_ids ev_binds_var no_given_eqs && (not (isTyVarTyVar tv1) || isTyVarTy ty2) Nothing -> False -{- Note [Float equalities from under a skolem binding] +{- Note [Do not float blocked constraints] +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +As #18855 showed, we must not float an equality that is blocked. +Consider + forall a[4]. [W] co1: alpha[4] ~ Maybe (a[4] |> bco) + [W] co2: alpha[4] ~ Maybe (beta[4] |> bco]) + [W] bco: kappa[2] ~ Type + +Now co1, co2 are blocked by bco. We will eventually float out bco +and solve it at level 2. But the danger is that we will *also* +float out co2, and that is bad bad bad. Because we'll promote alpha +and beta to level 2, and then fail to unify the promoted beta +with the skolem a[4]. + +Solution: don't float out blocked equalities. Remember: we only want +to float out if we can solve; see Note [Which equalities to float]. + +(Future plan: kill floating altogether.) + +Note [Float equalities from under a skolem binding] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Which of the simple equalities can we float out? Obviously, only ones that don't mention the skolem-bound variables. But that is diff --git a/compiler/GHC/Tc/Solver/Flatten.hs b/compiler/GHC/Tc/Solver/Flatten.hs index dd214ceb7c..48b9c55588 100644 --- a/compiler/GHC/Tc/Solver/Flatten.hs +++ b/compiler/GHC/Tc/Solver/Flatten.hs @@ -1206,9 +1206,11 @@ flatten_one ty@(ForAllTy {}) flatten_one (CastTy ty g) = do { (xi, co) <- flatten_one ty ; (g', _) <- flatten_co g - ; role <- getRole - ; return (mkCastTy xi g', castCoercionKind co role xi ty g' g) } + ; return (mkCastTy xi g', castCoercionKind1 co role xi ty g') } + -- It makes a /big/ difference to call castCoercionKind1 not + -- the more general castCoercionKind2. + -- See Note [castCoercionKind1] in GHC.Core.Coercion flatten_one (CoercionTy co) = first mkCoercionTy <$> flatten_co co |