diff options
| author | Sebastian Graf <sebastian.graf@kit.edu> | 2021-05-04 23:00:02 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Marge Bot <ben+marge-bot@smart-cactus.org> | 2021-09-30 00:56:30 -0400 |
| commit | c261f2207cf85c8770dc46fcfc46e9b1ddb49589 (patch) | |
| tree | 8da18607d7f16ec3c2d0a79e24637bea80956fc4 /testsuite/tests/deSugar | |
| parent | 594ee2f48f5b8affc85462543c54612ad45802bf (diff) | |
| download | haskell-c261f2207cf85c8770dc46fcfc46e9b1ddb49589.tar.gz | |
Nested CPR light unleashed (#18174)
This patch enables worker/wrapper for nested constructed products, as described
in `Note [Nested CPR]`. The machinery for expressing Nested CPR was already
there, since !5054. Worker/wrapper is equipped to exploit Nested CPR annotations
since !5338. CPR analysis already handles applications in batches since !5753.
This patch just needs to flip a few more switches:
1. In `cprTransformDataConWork`, we need to look at the field expressions
and their `CprType`s to see whether the evaluation of the expressions
terminates quickly (= is in HNF) or if they are put in strict fields.
If that is the case, then we retain their CPR info and may unbox nestedly
later on. More details in `Note [Nested CPR]`.
2. Enable nested `ConCPR` signatures in `GHC.Types.Cpr`.
3. In the `asConCpr` call in `GHC.Core.Opt.WorkWrap.Utils`, pass CPR info of
fields to the `Unbox`.
4. Instead of giving CPR signatures to DataCon workers and wrappers, we now have
`cprTransformDataConWork` for workers and treat wrappers by analysing their
unfolding. As a result, the code from GHC.Types.Id.Make went away completely.
5. I deactivated worker/wrappering for recursive DataCons and wrote a function
`isRecDataCon` to detect them. We really don't want to give `repeat` or
`replicate` the Nested CPR property.
See Note [CPR for recursive data structures] for which kind of recursive
DataCons we target.
6. Fix a couple of tests and their outputs.
I also documented that CPR can destroy sharing and lead to asymptotic increase
in allocations (which is tracked by #13331/#19326) in
`Note [CPR for data structures can destroy sharing]`.
Nofib results:
```
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Program Allocs Instrs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ben-raytrace -3.1% -0.4%
binary-trees +0.8% -2.9%
digits-of-e2 +5.8% +1.2%
event +0.8% -2.1%
fannkuch-redux +0.0% -1.4%
fish 0.0% -1.5%
gamteb -1.4% -0.3%
mkhprog +1.4% +0.8%
multiplier +0.0% -1.9%
pic -0.6% -0.1%
reptile -20.9% -17.8%
wave4main +4.8% +0.4%
x2n1 -100.0% -7.6%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Min -95.0% -17.8%
Max +5.8% +1.2%
Geometric Mean -2.9% -0.4%
```
The huge wins in x2n1 (loopy list) and reptile (see #19970) are due to
refraining from unboxing (:). Other benchmarks like digits-of-e2 or wave4main
regress because of that. Ultimately there are no great improvements due to
Nested CPR alone, but at least it's a win.
Binary sizes decrease by 0.6%.
There are a significant number of metric decreases. The most notable ones (>1%):
```
ManyAlternatives(normal) ghc/alloc 771656002.7 762187472.0 -1.2%
ManyConstructors(normal) ghc/alloc 4191073418.7 4114369216.0 -1.8%
MultiLayerModules(normal) ghc/alloc 3095678333.3 3128720704.0 +1.1%
PmSeriesG(normal) ghc/alloc 50096429.3 51495664.0 +2.8%
PmSeriesS(normal) ghc/alloc 63512989.3 64681600.0 +1.8%
PmSeriesV(normal) ghc/alloc 62575424.0 63767208.0 +1.9%
T10547(normal) ghc/alloc 29347469.3 29944240.0 +2.0%
T11303b(normal) ghc/alloc 46018752.0 47367576.0 +2.9%
T12150(optasm) ghc/alloc 81660890.7 82547696.0 +1.1%
T12234(optasm) ghc/alloc 59451253.3 60357952.0 +1.5%
T12545(normal) ghc/alloc 1705216250.7 1751278952.0 +2.7%
T12707(normal) ghc/alloc 981000472.0 968489800.0 -1.3% GOOD
T13056(optasm) ghc/alloc 389322664.0 372495160.0 -4.3% GOOD
T13253(normal) ghc/alloc 337174229.3 341954576.0 +1.4%
T13701(normal) ghc/alloc 2381455173.3 2439790328.0 +2.4% BAD
T14052(ghci) ghc/alloc 2162530642.7 2139108784.0 -1.1%
T14683(normal) ghc/alloc 3049744728.0 2977535064.0 -2.4% GOOD
T14697(normal) ghc/alloc 362980213.3 369304512.0 +1.7%
T15164(normal) ghc/alloc 1323102752.0 1307480600.0 -1.2%
T15304(normal) ghc/alloc 1304607429.3 1291024568.0 -1.0%
T16190(normal) ghc/alloc 281450410.7 284878048.0 +1.2%
T16577(normal) ghc/alloc 7984960789.3 7811668768.0 -2.2% GOOD
T17516(normal) ghc/alloc 1171051192.0 1153649664.0 -1.5%
T17836(normal) ghc/alloc 1115569746.7 1098197592.0 -1.6%
T17836b(normal) ghc/alloc 54322597.3 55518216.0 +2.2%
T17977(normal) ghc/alloc 47071754.7 48403408.0 +2.8%
T17977b(normal) ghc/alloc 42579133.3 43977392.0 +3.3%
T18923(normal) ghc/alloc 71764237.3 72566240.0 +1.1%
T1969(normal) ghc/alloc 784821002.7 773971776.0 -1.4% GOOD
T3294(normal) ghc/alloc 1634913973.3 1614323584.0 -1.3% GOOD
T4801(normal) ghc/alloc 295619648.0 292776440.0 -1.0%
T5321FD(normal) ghc/alloc 278827858.7 276067280.0 -1.0%
T5631(normal) ghc/alloc 586618202.7 577579960.0 -1.5%
T5642(normal) ghc/alloc 494923048.0 487927208.0 -1.4%
T5837(normal) ghc/alloc 37758061.3 39261608.0 +4.0%
T9020(optasm) ghc/alloc 257362077.3 254672416.0 -1.0%
T9198(normal) ghc/alloc 49313365.3 50603936.0 +2.6% BAD
T9233(normal) ghc/alloc 704944258.7 685692712.0 -2.7% GOOD
T9630(normal) ghc/alloc 1476621560.0 1455192784.0 -1.5%
T9675(optasm) ghc/alloc 443183173.3 433859696.0 -2.1% GOOD
T9872a(normal) ghc/alloc 1720926653.3 1693190072.0 -1.6% GOOD
T9872b(normal) ghc/alloc 2185618061.3 2162277568.0 -1.1% GOOD
T9872c(normal) ghc/alloc 1765842405.3 1733618088.0 -1.8% GOOD
TcPlugin_RewritePerf(normal) ghc/alloc 2388882730.7 2365504696.0 -1.0%
WWRec(normal) ghc/alloc 607073186.7 597512216.0 -1.6%
T9203(normal) run/alloc 107284064.0 102881832.0 -4.1%
haddock.Cabal(normal) run/alloc 24025329589.3 23768382560.0 -1.1%
haddock.base(normal) run/alloc 25660521653.3 25370321824.0 -1.1%
haddock.compiler(normal) run/alloc 74064171706.7 73358712280.0 -1.0%
```
The biggest exception to the rule is T13701 which seems to fluctuate as usual
(not unlike T12545). T14697 has a similar quality, being a generated
multi-module test. T5837 is small enough that it similarly doesn't measure
anything significant besides module loading overhead.
T13253 simply does one additional round of Simplification due to Nested CPR.
There are also some apparent regressions in T9198, T12234 and PmSeriesG that we
(@mpickering and I) were simply unable to reproduce locally. @mpickering tried
to run the CI script in a local Docker container and actually found that T9198
and PmSeriesG *improved*. In MRs that were rebased on top this one, like !4229,
I did not experience such increases. Let's not get hung up on these regression
tests, they were meant to test for asymptotic regressions.
The build-cabal test improves by 1.2% in -O0.
Metric Increase:
T10421
T12234
T12545
T13035
T13056
T13701
T14697
T18923
T5837
T9198
Metric Decrease:
ManyConstructors
T12545
T12707
T13056
T14683
T16577
T18223
T1969
T3294
T9203
T9233
T9675
T9872a
T9872b
T9872c
T9961
TcPlugin_RewritePerf
Diffstat (limited to 'testsuite/tests/deSugar')
| -rw-r--r-- | testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/T2431.stderr | 1 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/T2431.stderr b/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/T2431.stderr index 8b3f8a53b6..9a1f79839d 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/T2431.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/T2431.stderr @@ -7,7 +7,6 @@ Result size of Tidy Core T2431.$WRefl [InlPrag=INLINE[final] CONLIKE] :: forall a. a :~: a [GblId[DataConWrapper], Caf=NoCafRefs, - Cpr=1, Unf=Unf{Src=InlineStable, TopLvl=True, Value=True, ConLike=True, WorkFree=True, Expandable=True, Guidance=ALWAYS_IF(arity=0,unsat_ok=True,boring_ok=False) |