summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_compile/GADT10.hs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavid Terei <davidterei@gmail.com>2011-07-20 11:09:03 -0700
committerDavid Terei <davidterei@gmail.com>2011-07-20 11:26:35 -0700
commit16514f272fb42af6e9c7674a9bd6c9dce369231f (patch)
treee4f332b45fe65e2a7a2451be5674f887b42bf199 /testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_compile/GADT10.hs
parentebd422aed41048476aa61dd4c520d43becd78682 (diff)
downloadhaskell-16514f272fb42af6e9c7674a9bd6c9dce369231f.tar.gz
Move tests from tests/ghc-regress/* to just tests/*
Diffstat (limited to 'testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_compile/GADT10.hs')
-rw-r--r--testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_compile/GADT10.hs44
1 files changed, 44 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_compile/GADT10.hs b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_compile/GADT10.hs
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..76efaf1fcc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_compile/GADT10.hs
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+{-# LANGUAGE TypeFamilies, GADTs, RankNTypes #-}
+
+module GADT10 where
+
+-- [Sept 2010] Now works in GHC 7.0!
+
+-- This fails with
+--
+-- GADT10.hs:37:0:
+-- All of the type variables in the constraint `x ~
+-- y' are already in scope
+-- (at least one must be universally quantified here)
+-- In the type signature for `foo':
+-- foo :: EQUAL x y -> ((x ~ y) => t) -> t
+--
+-- GADT10.hs:38:4:
+-- Couldn't match expected type `y' against inferred type `x'
+-- `y' is a rigid type variable bound by
+-- the type signature for `foo' at GADT10.hs:8:15
+-- `x' is a rigid type variable bound by
+-- the type signature for `foo' at GADT10.hs:8:13
+-- In the pattern: EQUAL
+-- In the definition of `foo': foo EQUAL t = t
+--
+-- The first error can be fixed by using FlexibleContexts but I don't think that
+-- should be required here. In fact, if we remove RankNTypes, we get
+--
+-- Illegal polymorphic or qualified type: forall (co_wild_B1 :: x ~
+-- y).
+-- t
+-- In the type signature for `foo':
+-- foo :: EQUAL x y -> ((x ~ y) => t) -> t
+--
+-- which seems to contradict (at least sort of) the first error message.
+
+data EQUAL x y where
+ EQUAL :: EQUAL x x
+
+foo :: EQUAL x y -> (x~y => t) -> t
+foo EQUAL t = t
+
+bar :: EQUAL x y -> x -> y
+bar equ x = foo equ x
+