summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/testsuite/tests/module
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorVladislav Zavialov <vlad.z.4096@gmail.com>2019-10-30 08:44:34 +0300
committerVladislav Zavialov <vlad.z.4096@gmail.com>2019-11-27 11:32:18 +0300
commit8168b42a95ddf37c56958955eef065eb8747470f (patch)
treea677a67987372dac9732ea67f6ab37a77c02641a /testsuite/tests/module
parent5a08f7d405bbedfdc20c07f64726899f594e9d07 (diff)
downloadhaskell-8168b42a95ddf37c56958955eef065eb8747470f.tar.gz
Whitespace-sensitive bang patterns (#1087, #17162)wip/whitespace-and-lookahead
This patch implements a part of GHC Proposal #229 that covers five operators: * the bang operator (!) * the tilde operator (~) * the at operator (@) * the dollar operator ($) * the double dollar operator ($$) Based on surrounding whitespace, these operators are disambiguated into bang patterns, lazy patterns, strictness annotations, type applications, splices, and typed splices. This patch doesn't cover the (-) operator or the -Woperator-whitespace warning, which are left as future work.
Diffstat (limited to 'testsuite/tests/module')
-rw-r--r--testsuite/tests/module/mod69.stderr4
-rw-r--r--testsuite/tests/module/mod70.stderr4
2 files changed, 5 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod69.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod69.stderr
index db7487485e..dea161115e 100644
--- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod69.stderr
+++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod69.stderr
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
mod69.hs:3:7: error:
- Pattern syntax in expression context: x@1
- Did you mean to enable TypeApplications?
+ @-pattern in expression context: x@1
+ Type application syntax requires a space before '@'
diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod70.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod70.stderr
index 093f166ebd..6e9f854b7a 100644
--- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod70.stderr
+++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod70.stderr
@@ -1,2 +1,4 @@
-mod70.hs:3:9: error: Pattern syntax in expression context: ~1
+mod70.hs:3:9: error:
+ Lazy pattern in expression context: ~1
+ Did you mean to add a space after the '~'?