summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail140.stderr
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndrew Martin <andrew.thaddeus@gmail.com>2019-05-12 09:23:25 -0400
committerMarge Bot <ben+marge-bot@smart-cactus.org>2019-06-14 10:48:13 -0400
commiteffdd948056923f3bc03688c24d7e0339d6272f5 (patch)
tree02a3cb68ce1680db89c8440ba8beea808cbf4a11 /testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail140.stderr
parent3bc6df3223f62a8366e2e4267bac23aa08e6a939 (diff)
downloadhaskell-effdd948056923f3bc03688c24d7e0339d6272f5.tar.gz
Implement the -XUnliftedNewtypes extension.
GHC Proposal: 0013-unlifted-newtypes.rst Discussion: https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/98 Issues: #15219, #1311, #13595, #15883 Implementation Details: Note [Implementation of UnliftedNewtypes] Note [Unifying data family kinds] Note [Compulsory newtype unfolding] This patch introduces the -XUnliftedNewtypes extension. When this extension is enabled, GHC drops the restriction that the field in a newtype must be of kind (TYPE 'LiftedRep). This allows types like Int# and ByteArray# to be used in a newtype. Additionally, coerce is made levity-polymorphic so that it can be used with newtypes over unlifted types. The bulk of the changes are in TcTyClsDecls.hs. With -XUnliftedNewtypes, getInitialKind is more liberal, introducing a unification variable to return the kind (TYPE r0) rather than just returning (TYPE 'LiftedRep). When kind-checking a data constructor with kcConDecl, we attempt to unify the kind of a newtype with the kind of its field's type. When typechecking a data declaration with tcTyClDecl, we again perform a unification. See the implementation note for more on this. Co-authored-by: Richard Eisenberg <rae@richarde.dev>
Diffstat (limited to 'testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail140.stderr')
-rw-r--r--testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail140.stderr6
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail140.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail140.stderr
index 85217315ca..924e14081b 100644
--- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail140.stderr
+++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail140.stderr
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
tcfail140.hs:10:7: error:
- • Couldn't match expected type ‘Integer -> t’
- with actual type ‘Int’
+ • Couldn't match expected type ‘t0 -> t’ with actual type ‘Int’
• The function ‘f’ is applied to two arguments,
but its type ‘Int -> Int’ has only one
In the expression: f 3 9
@@ -9,8 +8,7 @@ tcfail140.hs:10:7: error:
• Relevant bindings include bar :: t (bound at tcfail140.hs:10:1)
tcfail140.hs:12:10: error:
- • Couldn't match expected type ‘Integer -> t’
- with actual type ‘Int’
+ • Couldn't match expected type ‘t1 -> t’ with actual type ‘Int’
• The operator ‘f’ takes two arguments,
but its type ‘Int -> Int’ has only one
In the expression: 3 `f` 4