summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/testsuite/tests
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRyan Scott <ryan.gl.scott@gmail.com>2020-01-15 11:01:03 -0500
committerRyan Scott <ryan.gl.scott@gmail.com>2020-01-25 08:15:05 -0500
commit0940b59accb6926aaede045bcd5f5bdc77c7075d (patch)
treeb4c2b12377f02897ddc27e48e1f88a2201c655e3 /testsuite/tests
parentb3e5c678851ed73897b0eb337e656ff377d242c9 (diff)
downloadhaskell-0940b59accb6926aaede045bcd5f5bdc77c7075d.tar.gz
Do not bring visible foralls into scope in hsScopedTvswip/T17687
Previously, `hsScopedTvs` (and its cousin `hsWcScopedTvs`) pretended that visible dependent quantification could not possibly happen at the term level, and cemented that assumption with an `ASSERT`: ```hs hsScopedTvs (HsForAllTy { hst_fvf = vis_flag, ... }) = ASSERT( vis_flag == ForallInvis ) ... ``` It turns out that this assumption is wrong. You can end up tripping this `ASSERT` if you stick it to the man and write a type for a term that uses visible dependent quantification anyway, like in this example: ```hs {-# LANGUAGE ScopedTypeVariables #-} x :: forall a -> a -> a x = x ``` That won't typecheck, but that's not the point. Before the typechecker has a chance to reject this, the renamer will try to use `hsScopedTvs` to bring `a` into scope over the body of `x`, since `a` is quantified by a `forall`. This, in turn, causes the `ASSERT` to fail. Bummer. Instead of walking on this dangerous ground, this patch makes GHC adopt a more hardline stance by pattern-matching directly on `ForallInvis` in `hsScopedTvs`: ```hs hsScopedTvs (HsForAllTy { hst_fvf = ForallInvis, ... }) = ... ``` Now `a` will not be brought over the body of `x` at all (which is how it should be), there's no chance of the `ASSERT` failing anymore (as it's gone), and best of all, the behavior of `hsScopedTvs` does not change. Everyone wins! Fixes #17687.
Diffstat (limited to 'testsuite/tests')
-rw-r--r--testsuite/tests/dependent/should_fail/T17687.hs6
-rw-r--r--testsuite/tests/dependent/should_fail/T17687.stderr6
-rw-r--r--testsuite/tests/dependent/should_fail/all.T1
3 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/testsuite/tests/dependent/should_fail/T17687.hs b/testsuite/tests/dependent/should_fail/T17687.hs
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..b47363929e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testsuite/tests/dependent/should_fail/T17687.hs
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+{-# LANGUAGE ScopedTypeVariables #-}
+
+module T17687 where
+
+x :: forall a -> a -> a
+x = x
diff --git a/testsuite/tests/dependent/should_fail/T17687.stderr b/testsuite/tests/dependent/should_fail/T17687.stderr
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..e4ac034f93
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testsuite/tests/dependent/should_fail/T17687.stderr
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+
+T17687.hs:5:6: error:
+ • Illegal visible, dependent quantification in the type of a term:
+ forall a -> a -> a
+ (GHC does not yet support this)
+ • In the type signature: x :: forall a -> a -> a
diff --git a/testsuite/tests/dependent/should_fail/all.T b/testsuite/tests/dependent/should_fail/all.T
index dde686af7a..d3d155f163 100644
--- a/testsuite/tests/dependent/should_fail/all.T
+++ b/testsuite/tests/dependent/should_fail/all.T
@@ -64,3 +64,4 @@ test('T14880', normal, compile_fail, [''])
test('T14880-2', normal, compile_fail, [''])
test('T15076', normal, compile_fail, [''])
test('T15076b', normal, compile_fail, [''])
+test('T17687', normal, compile_fail, [''])