Typos and grammar in manual/comments

5 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail-functor2.hs b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail-functor2.hs
index 7198755b80..77e17cf381 100644
--- a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail-functor2.hs
+++ b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail-functor2.hs
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ newtype OnSecondArg a = OnSecondArg (Either a a)
 newtype NoArguments = NoArguments Int
    deriving (Functor)
 
--- Derive Functor on a type with extra stupid-contraints on 'a'
+-- Derive Functor on a type with extra stupid-constraints on 'a'
 
 data Eq a => StupidConstraint a = StupidType a
    deriving (Functor)
diff --git a/testsuite/tests/printer/Ppr006.hs b/testsuite/tests/printer/Ppr006.hs
index 280ec564b4..8765860981 100644
--- a/testsuite/tests/printer/Ppr006.hs
+++ b/testsuite/tests/printer/Ppr006.hs
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ commands = [
   -- Library:  add song to playlist and play it
   -- Browse:   either add song to playlist and play it, or :move-in
   , command "default-action" [help|
-      depending on the item under the cursor, somthing different happens:
+      depending on the item under the cursor, something different happens:
 
       - *Playlist* start playing the song under the cursor
 
diff --git a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/overlapping/SH_Overlap8.hs b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/overlapping/SH_Overlap8.hs
index 6523193db3..6026769941 100644
--- a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/overlapping/SH_Overlap8.hs
+++ b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/overlapping/SH_Overlap8.hs
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 {-# LANGUAGE FlexibleInstances #-}
 
 -- | Overlapping instances, but with a single parameter type-class and no
--- orphans. So `SH_Overlap8` decided to explictly depend on `SH_Overlap8_A`
+-- orphans. So `SH_Overlap8` decided to explicitly depend on `SH_Overlap8_A`
 -- since that's where the type-class `C` with function `f` is defined.
 --
 -- Question: Safe or Unsafe? Safe
diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/T4361.hs b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/T4361.hs
index b61e763488..ac04f40407 100644
--- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/T4361.hs
+++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/T4361.hs
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ moduloBasisx p = let x :: ()
                      x = upLinSolvRing p
                  in ()
 
-  -- This is very delicate!  The contraint (LinSolvRing (Pol a))
+  -- This is very delicate!  The constraint (LinSolvRing (Pol a))
   -- arises in the RHS of x, and we must be careful *not* to simplify
   -- it with the instance declaration "XXXX", else we get the
   -- unsatisfiable constraint (EuclideanRing a). In effect, the
diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail143.hs b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail143.hs
index f0ee21f352..55b45eca31 100644
--- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail143.hs
+++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail143.hs
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ changes the order.
 
 
 Hmm.  Perhaps a good improvement strategy would be:
-  - first do improvement against the instance declartions
+  - first do improvement against the instance declarations
   - and only then do pairwise improvement between constraints
 
 I've implemented that, and indeed it improves the result.