diff options
745 files changed, 3464 insertions, 3475 deletions
diff --git a/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail01.stderr b/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail01.stderr index 70553f983f..160575cf92 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail01.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail01.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -annfail01.hs:4:1: Not in scope: type constructor or class `Foo' +annfail01.hs:4:1: Not in scope: type constructor or class ‛Foo’ -annfail01.hs:5:1: Not in scope: `f' +annfail01.hs:5:1: Not in scope: ‛f’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail02.stderr b/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail02.stderr index 83d54f9840..21f7aff821 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail02.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail02.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -annfail02.hs:6:1: Not in scope: data constructor `Foo' +annfail02.hs:6:1: Not in scope: data constructor ‛Foo’ -annfail02.hs:7:1: Not in scope: type constructor or class `Bar' +annfail02.hs:7:1: Not in scope: type constructor or class ‛Bar’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail03.stderr b/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail03.stderr index a7be7feb93..9c15855076 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail03.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail03.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,8 @@ annfail03.hs:17:1: - GHC stage restriction: instance for `Data InModule' - is used in a top-level splice or annotation, + GHC stage restriction: + instance for ‛Data + InModule’ is used in a top-level splice or annotation, and must be imported, not defined locally In the expression: InModule In the annotation: {-# ANN f InModule #-} diff --git a/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail04.stderr b/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail04.stderr index dcbe0e7945..9d7bf39778 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail04.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail04.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,8 @@ annfail04.hs:14:12: - GHC stage restriction: instance for `Thing Int' - is used in a top-level splice or annotation, + GHC stage restriction: + instance for ‛Thing + Int’ is used in a top-level splice or annotation, and must be imported, not defined locally In the expression: (thing :: Int) In the annotation: {-# ANN f (thing :: Int) #-} diff --git a/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail06.stderr b/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail06.stderr index c5082c386e..aec329d5fa 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail06.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail06.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,8 @@ annfail06.hs:21:1: - GHC stage restriction: instance for `Data InstancesInWrongModule' - is used in a top-level splice or annotation, + GHC stage restriction: + instance for ‛Data + InstancesInWrongModule’ is used in a top-level splice or annotation, and must be imported, not defined locally In the expression: InstancesInWrongModule In the annotation: {-# ANN f InstancesInWrongModule #-} diff --git a/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail07.stderr b/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail07.stderr index 01f4b62c45..678a1609ec 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail07.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail07.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ annfail07.hs:9:17: - Couldn't match expected type `[a0]' with actual type `Bool' - In the first argument of `head', namely `True' + Couldn't match expected type ‛[a0]’ with actual type ‛Bool’ + In the first argument of ‛head’, namely ‛True’ In the expression: (head True) In the annotation: {-# ANN f (head True) #-} diff --git a/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail08.stderr b/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail08.stderr index df18d002ee..b9023476f0 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail08.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail08.stderr @@ -6,6 +6,6 @@ annfail08.hs:9:1: In the annotation: {-# ANN f (id + 1) #-} annfail08.hs:9:15: - No instance for (Num (a0 -> a0)) arising from a use of `+' + No instance for (Num (a0 -> a0)) arising from a use of ‛+’ In the expression: (id + 1) In the annotation: {-# ANN f (id + 1) #-} diff --git a/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail09.stderr b/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail09.stderr index 5eae63a012..4bddab8dd0 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail09.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail09.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ annfail09.hs:11:11: - GHC stage restriction: `g' - is used in a top-level splice or annotation, + GHC stage restriction: + ‛g’ is used in a top-level splice or annotation, and must be imported, not defined locally In the expression: g In the annotation: {-# ANN f g #-} diff --git a/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail10.stderr b/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail10.stderr index c5b0356892..0fd7859ef7 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail10.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail10.stderr @@ -1,27 +1,27 @@ annfail10.hs:9:1: No instance for (Data.Data.Data a0) arising from an annotation - The type variable `a0' is ambiguous + The type variable ‛a0’ is ambiguous Note: there are several potential instances: - instance Data.Data.Data () -- Defined in `Data.Data' + instance Data.Data.Data () -- Defined in ‛Data.Data’ instance (Data.Data.Data a, Data.Data.Data b) => Data.Data.Data (a, b) - -- Defined in `Data.Data' + -- Defined in ‛Data.Data’ instance (Data.Data.Data a, Data.Data.Data b, Data.Data.Data c) => Data.Data.Data (a, b, c) - -- Defined in `Data.Data' + -- Defined in ‛Data.Data’ ...plus 27 others In the expression: 1 In the annotation: {-# ANN f 1 #-} annfail10.hs:9:11: - No instance for (Num a0) arising from the literal `1' - The type variable `a0' is ambiguous + No instance for (Num a0) arising from the literal ‛1’ + The type variable ‛a0’ is ambiguous Note: there are several potential instances: - instance Num Double -- Defined in `GHC.Float' - instance Num Float -- Defined in `GHC.Float' + instance Num Double -- Defined in ‛GHC.Float’ + instance Num Float -- Defined in ‛GHC.Float’ instance Integral a => Num (GHC.Real.Ratio a) - -- Defined in `GHC.Real' + -- Defined in ‛GHC.Real’ ...plus 11 others In the expression: 1 In the annotation: {-# ANN f 1 #-} diff --git a/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail11.stderr b/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail11.stderr index 18769f7466..39ff0e82eb 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail11.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/annotations/should_fail/annfail11.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -annfail11.hs:3:1: Not in scope: `length' +annfail11.hs:3:1: Not in scope: ‛length’ -annfail11.hs:4:1: Not in scope: type constructor or class `Integer' +annfail11.hs:4:1: Not in scope: type constructor or class ‛Integer’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/arrows/should_fail/T5380.stderr b/testsuite/tests/arrows/should_fail/T5380.stderr index 1d3fa3a1ed..567450ef27 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/arrows/should_fail/T5380.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/arrows/should_fail/T5380.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ T5380.hs:7:27: - Couldn't match expected type `Bool' with actual type `not_bool' - `not_bool' is a rigid type variable bound by + Couldn't match expected type ‛Bool’ with actual type ‛not_bool’ + ‛not_bool’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for testB :: not_bool -> (() -> ()) -> () -> not_unit at T5380.hs:6:10 @@ -11,12 +11,12 @@ T5380.hs:7:27: b :: not_bool (bound at T5380.hs:7:7) In the expression: b In the expression: proc () -> if b then f -< () else f -< () - In an equation for `testB': + In an equation for ‛testB’: testB b f = proc () -> if b then f -< () else f -< () T5380.hs:7:34: - Couldn't match type `not_unit' with `()' - `not_unit' is a rigid type variable bound by + Couldn't match type ‛not_unit’ with ‛()’ + ‛not_unit’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for testB :: not_bool -> (() -> ()) -> () -> not_unit at T5380.hs:6:10 @@ -27,5 +27,5 @@ T5380.hs:7:34: (bound at T5380.hs:7:1) In the expression: f In the expression: proc () -> if b then f -< () else f -< () - In an equation for `testB': + In an equation for ‛testB’: testB b f = proc () -> if b then f -< () else f -< () diff --git a/testsuite/tests/arrows/should_fail/arrowfail001.stderr b/testsuite/tests/arrows/should_fail/arrowfail001.stderr index 261aa278a4..6dc2cb76c4 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/arrows/should_fail/arrowfail001.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/arrows/should_fail/arrowfail001.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ arrowfail001.hs:16:36: - No instance for (Foo a) arising from a use of `foo' + No instance for (Foo a) arising from a use of ‛foo’ In the expression: foo In the expression: proc x -> case x of { Bar a -> foo -< a } - In an equation for `get': + In an equation for ‛get’: get = proc x -> case x of { Bar a -> foo -< a } diff --git a/testsuite/tests/arrows/should_fail/arrowfail002.stderr b/testsuite/tests/arrows/should_fail/arrowfail002.stderr index c653acc339..67a93db719 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/arrows/should_fail/arrowfail002.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/arrows/should_fail/arrowfail002.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -arrowfail002.hs:6:17: Not in scope: `x' +arrowfail002.hs:6:17: Not in scope: ‛x’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/arrows/should_fail/arrowfail004.stderr b/testsuite/tests/arrows/should_fail/arrowfail004.stderr index 8a20c6bcbb..65cef2545b 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/arrows/should_fail/arrowfail004.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/arrows/should_fail/arrowfail004.stderr @@ -3,5 +3,5 @@ arrowfail004.hs:12:15: Proc patterns cannot use existential or GADT data constructors In the pattern: T x In the expression: proc (T x) -> do { returnA -< T x } - In an equation for `panic': + In an equation for ‛panic’: panic = proc (T x) -> do { returnA -< T x } diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/GadtOverlap.stderr b/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/GadtOverlap.stderr index 423d69469f..359a352edb 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/GadtOverlap.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/GadtOverlap.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -GadtOverlap.hs:19:1: - Warning: Pattern match(es) are non-exhaustive - In an equation for `h': Patterns not matched: T3 +GadtOverlap.hs:19:1: Warning: + Pattern match(es) are non-exhaustive + In an equation for ‛h’: Patterns not matched: T3 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/T2395.stderr b/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/T2395.stderr index 4bfd9d6bb8..241a767f7c 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/T2395.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/T2395.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -T2395.hs:12:1: - Warning: Pattern match(es) are overlapped - In an equation for `bar': bar _ = ... +T2395.hs:12:1: Warning: + Pattern match(es) are overlapped + In an equation for ‛bar’: bar _ = ... diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/T5117.stderr b/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/T5117.stderr index e9ddba143b..2860940b0c 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/T5117.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/T5117.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -
-T5117.hs:15:1:
- Warning: Pattern match(es) are overlapped
- In an equation for `f3': f3 (MyString "a") = ...
+ +T5117.hs:15:1: Warning: + Pattern match(es) are overlapped + In an equation for ‛f3’: f3 (MyString "a") = ... diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds002.stderr-ghc b/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds002.stderr-ghc index baf7ffde53..c526e0db48 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds002.stderr-ghc +++ b/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds002.stderr-ghc @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ -ds002.hs:7:1: - Warning: Pattern match(es) are overlapped - In an equation for `f': - f y = ... - f z = ... +ds002.hs:7:1: Warning: + Pattern match(es) are overlapped + In an equation for ‛f’: + f y = ... + f z = ... -ds002.hs:11:1: - Warning: Pattern match(es) are overlapped - In an equation for `g': g x y z = ... +ds002.hs:11:1: Warning: + Pattern match(es) are overlapped + In an equation for ‛g’: g x y z = ... diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds003.stderr-ghc b/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds003.stderr-ghc index 5b1bd3949f..f12789da42 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds003.stderr-ghc +++ b/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds003.stderr-ghc @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ -ds003.hs:5:1: - Warning: Pattern match(es) are overlapped - In an equation for `f': - f (x : x1 : x2 : x3) ~(y, ys) z = ... - f x y True = ... +ds003.hs:5:1: Warning: + Pattern match(es) are overlapped + In an equation for ‛f’: + f (x : x1 : x2 : x3) ~(y, ys) z = ... + f x y True = ... diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds019.stderr-ghc b/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds019.stderr-ghc index 68816686b1..fd13ec7203 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds019.stderr-ghc +++ b/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds019.stderr-ghc @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -ds019.hs:5:1: - Warning: Pattern match(es) are overlapped - In an equation for `f': - f d (j, k) p = ... - f (e, f, g) l q = ... - f h (m, n) r = ... +ds019.hs:5:1: Warning: + Pattern match(es) are overlapped + In an equation for ‛f’: + f d (j, k) p = ... + f (e, f, g) l q = ... + f h (m, n) r = ... diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds020.stderr-ghc b/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds020.stderr-ghc index 3f9205a729..4232320025 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds020.stderr-ghc +++ b/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds020.stderr-ghc @@ -1,18 +1,18 @@ -ds020.hs:8:1: - Warning: Pattern match(es) are overlapped - In an equation for `a': a ~(~[], ~[], ~[]) = ... +ds020.hs:8:1: Warning: + Pattern match(es) are overlapped + In an equation for ‛a’: a ~(~[], ~[], ~[]) = ... -ds020.hs:11:1: - Warning: Pattern match(es) are overlapped - In an equation for `b': b ~(~x : ~xs : ~ys) = ... +ds020.hs:11:1: Warning: + Pattern match(es) are overlapped + In an equation for ‛b’: b ~(~x : ~xs : ~ys) = ... -ds020.hs:16:1: - Warning: Pattern match(es) are overlapped - In an equation for `d': - d ~(n+43) = ... - d ~(n+999) = ... +ds020.hs:16:1: Warning: + Pattern match(es) are overlapped + In an equation for ‛d’: + d ~(n+43) = ... + d ~(n+999) = ... -ds020.hs:22:1: - Warning: Pattern match(es) are overlapped - In an equation for `f': f x@(~[]) = ... +ds020.hs:22:1: Warning: + Pattern match(es) are overlapped + In an equation for ‛f’: f x@(~[]) = ... diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds022.stderr-ghc b/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds022.stderr-ghc index ce6d4a52c1..7dd50a2610 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds022.stderr-ghc +++ b/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds022.stderr-ghc @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ -ds022.hs:20:1: - Warning: Pattern match(es) are overlapped - In an equation for `i': - i 1 0.011e2 = ... - i 2 2.20000 = ... +ds022.hs:20:1: Warning: + Pattern match(es) are overlapped + In an equation for ‛i’: + i 1 0.011e2 = ... + i 2 2.20000 = ... diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds041.stderr-ghc b/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds041.stderr-ghc index acf3e1ae6f..48129316fe 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds041.stderr-ghc +++ b/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds041.stderr-ghc @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ -ds041.hs:1:14: - Warning: -XDatatypeContexts is deprecated: It was widely considered a misfeature, and has been removed from the Haskell language. +ds041.hs:1:14: Warning: + -XDatatypeContexts is deprecated: It was widely considered a misfeature, and has been removed from the Haskell language. -ds041.hs:16:7: - Warning: Fields of `Foo' not initialised: x +ds041.hs:16:7: Warning: + Fields of ‛Foo’ not initialised: x In the expression: Foo {} - In an equation for `foo': foo = Foo {} + In an equation for ‛foo’: foo = Foo {} diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds051.stderr-ghc b/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds051.stderr-ghc index a098efee33..c40c44620e 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds051.stderr-ghc +++ b/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds051.stderr-ghc @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ -ds051.hs:6:1: - Warning: Pattern match(es) are overlapped - In an equation for `f1': f1 "ab" = ... +ds051.hs:6:1: Warning: + Pattern match(es) are overlapped + In an equation for ‛f1’: f1 "ab" = ... -ds051.hs:11:1: - Warning: Pattern match(es) are overlapped - In an equation for `f2': f2 ('a' : 'b' : []) = ... +ds051.hs:11:1: Warning: + Pattern match(es) are overlapped + In an equation for ‛f2’: f2 ('a' : 'b' : []) = ... -ds051.hs:16:1: - Warning: Pattern match(es) are overlapped - In an equation for `f3': f3 "ab" = ... +ds051.hs:16:1: Warning: + Pattern match(es) are overlapped + In an equation for ‛f3’: f3 "ab" = ... diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds053.stderr-ghc b/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds053.stderr-ghc index 3bce906869..861e66b847 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds053.stderr-ghc +++ b/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds053.stderr-ghc @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -ds053.hs:5:1: Warning: Defined but not used: `f' +ds053.hs:5:1: Warning: Defined but not used: ‛f’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds056.stderr b/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds056.stderr index 6e0972bef4..f4d2e81b51 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds056.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/deSugar/should_compile/ds056.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -ds056.hs:8:1: - Warning: Pattern match(es) are overlapped - In an equation for `g': g _ = ... +ds056.hs:8:1: Warning: + Pattern match(es) are overlapped + In an equation for ‛g’: g _ = ... diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_compile/drv021.stderr b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_compile/drv021.stderr index 8143dfee6c..2071183c53 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_compile/drv021.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_compile/drv021.stderr @@ -1,13 +1,13 @@ drv021.hs:9:1: Warning: - Module `Data.OldTypeable' is deprecated: Use Data.Typeable instead + Module ‛Data.OldTypeable’ is deprecated: Use Data.Typeable instead drv021.hs:14:19: Warning: - In the use of type constructor or class `Typeable1' + In the use of type constructor or class ‛Typeable1’ (imported from Data.OldTypeable, but defined in Data.OldTypeable.Internal): Deprecated: "Use Data.Typeable.Internal instead" drv021.hs:15:19: Warning: - In the use of type constructor or class `Typeable2' + In the use of type constructor or class ‛Typeable2’ (imported from Data.OldTypeable, but defined in Data.OldTypeable.Internal): Deprecated: "Use Data.Typeable.Internal instead" diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T1133A.stderr b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T1133A.stderr index 734081ede5..c1830b143e 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T1133A.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T1133A.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ T1133A.hs:6:28: - Can't make a derived instance of `Enum X': - `X' must be an enumeration type + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Enum X’: + ‛X’ must be an enumeration type (an enumeration consists of one or more nullary, non-GADT constructors) Try -XGeneralizedNewtypeDeriving for GHC's newtype-deriving extension - In the newtype declaration for `X' + In the newtype declaration for ‛X’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T2394.stderr b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T2394.stderr index 9972186ed5..f8ccbda848 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T2394.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T2394.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ -
-T2394.hs:9:1:
- Can't make a derived instance of `Data (a -> b)':
- The last argument of the instance must be a data or newtype application
- In the stand-alone deriving instance for
- `(Data a, Data b) => Data (a -> b)'
+ +T2394.hs:9:1: + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Data (a -> b)’: + The last argument of the instance must be a data or newtype application + In the stand-alone deriving instance for + ‛(Data a, Data b) => Data (a -> b)’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T2604.stderr b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T2604.stderr index 8fe5ffff52..fc5320030f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T2604.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T2604.stderr @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ -
-T2604.hs:7:35:
- Can't make a derived instance of `Typeable * (DList a)':
- You need -XDeriveDataTypeable to derive an instance for this class
- In the data declaration for `DList'
-
-T2604.hs:9:38:
- Can't make a derived instance of `Typeable * (NList a)':
- You need -XDeriveDataTypeable to derive an instance for this class
- In the newtype declaration for `NList'
+ +T2604.hs:7:35: + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Typeable * (DList a)’: + You need -XDeriveDataTypeable to derive an instance for this class + In the data declaration for ‛DList’ + +T2604.hs:9:38: + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Typeable * (NList a)’: + You need -XDeriveDataTypeable to derive an instance for this class + In the newtype declaration for ‛NList’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T2701.stderr b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T2701.stderr index 150add58c6..722c0c12bf 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T2701.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T2701.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -
-T2701.hs:10:32:
- Can't make a derived instance of `Data Foo':
- Don't know how to derive `Data' for type `Int#'
- In the data declaration for `Foo'
+ +T2701.hs:10:32: + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Data Foo’: + Don't know how to derive ‛Data’ for type ‛Int#’ + In the data declaration for ‛Foo’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T2721.stderr b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T2721.stderr index 03339d3bfa..64e93c3d12 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T2721.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T2721.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ -
-T2721.hs:15:28:
- Can't make a derived instance of `C N'
- (even with cunning newtype deriving):
- the class has associated types
- In the newtype declaration for `N'
+ +T2721.hs:15:28: + Can't make a derived instance of ‛C N’ + (even with cunning newtype deriving): + the class has associated types + In the newtype declaration for ‛N’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T3101.stderr b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T3101.stderr index b491759381..b07e2570af 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T3101.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T3101.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ -
-T3101.hs:9:12:
- Can't make a derived instance of `Show Boom':
- Constructor `Boom' must have a Haskell-98 type
- Possible fix: use a standalone deriving declaration instead
- In the data declaration for `Boom'
+ +T3101.hs:9:12: + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Show Boom’: + Constructor ‛Boom’ must have a Haskell-98 type + Possible fix: use a standalone deriving declaration instead + In the data declaration for ‛Boom’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T3833.stderr b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T3833.stderr index 2d31cc1364..3221c355ba 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T3833.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T3833.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ T3833.hs:9:1: - Can't make a derived instance of `Monoid (DecodeMap e)': - `Monoid' is not a derivable class + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Monoid (DecodeMap e)’: + ‛Monoid’ is not a derivable class Try -XGeneralizedNewtypeDeriving for GHC's newtype-deriving extension - In the stand-alone deriving instance for `Monoid (DecodeMap e)' + In the stand-alone deriving instance for ‛Monoid (DecodeMap e)’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T3834.stderr b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T3834.stderr index 199b4bb799..ba51c74d53 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T3834.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T3834.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ T3834.hs:8:1: - Can't make a derived instance of `C T': - `C' is not a derivable class + Can't make a derived instance of ‛C T’: + ‛C’ is not a derivable class Try -XGeneralizedNewtypeDeriving for GHC's newtype-deriving extension - In the stand-alone deriving instance for `C T' + In the stand-alone deriving instance for ‛C T’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T4528.stderr b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T4528.stderr index 8f008e8908..1746239158 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T4528.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T4528.stderr @@ -1,14 +1,14 @@ T4528.hs:9:1: - Can't make a derived instance of `Enum (Foo a)': - `Foo' must be an enumeration type + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Enum (Foo a)’: + ‛Foo’ must be an enumeration type (an enumeration consists of one or more nullary, non-GADT constructors) - In the stand-alone deriving instance for `Enum (Foo a)' + In the stand-alone deriving instance for ‛Enum (Foo a)’ T4528.hs:10:1: - Can't make a derived instance of `Bounded (Foo a)': - `Foo' must be an enumeration type + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Bounded (Foo a)’: + ‛Foo’ must be an enumeration type (an enumeration consists of one or more nullary, non-GADT constructors) or - `Foo' must have precisely one constructor - In the stand-alone deriving instance for `Bounded (Foo a)' + ‛Foo’ must have precisely one constructor + In the stand-alone deriving instance for ‛Bounded (Foo a)’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T5287.stderr b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T5287.stderr index 9de62ef2fc..8bacf0634b 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T5287.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T5287.stderr @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ -
-T5287.hs:6:10:
- Could not deduce (A a oops0)
- arising from the ambiguity check for an instance declaration
- from the context (A a oops)
- bound by an instance declaration: A a oops => Read (D a)
- at T5287.hs:6:10-31
- The type variable `oops0' is ambiguous
- In the ambiguity check for: forall a oops. A a oops => Read (D a)
- In the instance declaration for `Read (D a)'
+ +T5287.hs:6:10: + Could not deduce (A a oops0) + arising from the ambiguity check for an instance declaration + from the context (A a oops) + bound by an instance declaration: A a oops => Read (D a) + at T5287.hs:6:10-31 + The type variable ‛oops0’ is ambiguous + In the ambiguity check for: forall a oops. A a oops => Read (D a) + In the instance declaration for ‛Read (D a)’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T5478.stderr b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T5478.stderr index a49b188da7..e3c968f62f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T5478.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T5478.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -
-T5478.hs:6:38:
- Can't make a derived instance of `Show Foo':
- Don't know how to derive `Show' for type `ByteArray#'
- In the data declaration for `Foo'
+ +T5478.hs:6:38: + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Show Foo’: + Don't know how to derive ‛Show’ for type ‛ByteArray#’ + In the data declaration for ‛Foo’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T5686.stderr b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T5686.stderr index 27f998fe9d..0bffdf5697 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T5686.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T5686.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -
-T5686.hs:4:29:
- Can't make a derived instance of `Functor U':
- Constructor `U' must use the type variable only as the last argument of a data type
- In the data declaration for `U'
+ +T5686.hs:4:29: + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Functor U’: + Constructor ‛U’ must use the type variable only as the last argument of a data type + In the data declaration for ‛U’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T5922.stderr b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T5922.stderr index 8b8de18d28..1b58511d95 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T5922.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/T5922.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -
-T5922.hs:3:42:
- Illegal deriving item `show'
- In the data declaration for `Proposition'
+ +T5922.hs:3:42: + Illegal deriving item ‛show’ + In the data declaration for ‛Proposition’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail-foldable-traversable1.stderr b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail-foldable-traversable1.stderr index fa5633e786..e4c07b5220 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail-foldable-traversable1.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail-foldable-traversable1.stderr @@ -16,11 +16,11 @@ drvfail-foldable-traversable1.hs:13:22: When deriving the instance for (Traversable Trivial2) drvfail-foldable-traversable1.hs:17:22: - Can't make a derived instance of `Foldable Infinite': - Constructor `Infinite' must not contain function types - In the data declaration for `Infinite' + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Foldable Infinite’: + Constructor ‛Infinite’ must not contain function types + In the data declaration for ‛Infinite’ drvfail-foldable-traversable1.hs:21:22: - Can't make a derived instance of `Traversable (Cont r)': - Constructor `Cont' must not contain function types - In the data declaration for `Cont' + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Traversable (Cont r)’: + Constructor ‛Cont’ must not contain function types + In the data declaration for ‛Cont’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail-functor1.stderr b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail-functor1.stderr index 54632ba05e..ec0e79499a 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail-functor1.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail-functor1.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -
-drvfail-functor1.hs:6:14:
- Can't make a derived instance of `Functor List':
- You need -XDeriveFunctor to derive an instance for this class
- In the data declaration for `List'
+ +drvfail-functor1.hs:6:14: + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Functor List’: + You need -XDeriveFunctor to derive an instance for this class + In the data declaration for ‛List’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail-functor2.stderr b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail-functor2.stderr index 54dc6f7019..8691b38719 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail-functor2.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail-functor2.stderr @@ -3,24 +3,24 @@ drvfail-functor2.hs:1:29: Warning: -XDatatypeContexts is deprecated: It was widely considered a misfeature, and has been removed from the Haskell language. drvfail-functor2.hs:7:14: - Can't make a derived instance of `Functor InFunctionArgument': - Constructor `InFunctionArgument' must not use the type variable in a function argument - In the newtype declaration for `InFunctionArgument' + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Functor InFunctionArgument’: + Constructor ‛InFunctionArgument’ must not use the type variable in a function argument + In the newtype declaration for ‛InFunctionArgument’ drvfail-functor2.hs:10:14: - Can't make a derived instance of `Functor OnSecondArg': - Constructor `OnSecondArg' must use the type variable only as the last argument of a data type - In the newtype declaration for `OnSecondArg' + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Functor OnSecondArg’: + Constructor ‛OnSecondArg’ must use the type variable only as the last argument of a data type + In the newtype declaration for ‛OnSecondArg’ drvfail-functor2.hs:15:14: - Cannot derive well-kinded instance of form `Functor (NoArguments ...)' - Class `Functor' expects an argument of kind `* -> *' - In the newtype declaration for `NoArguments' + Cannot derive well-kinded instance of form ‛Functor (NoArguments ...)’ + Class ‛Functor’ expects an argument of kind ‛* -> *’ + In the newtype declaration for ‛NoArguments’ drvfail-functor2.hs:20:14: - Can't make a derived instance of `Functor StupidConstraint': - Data type `StupidConstraint' must not have a class context (Eq a) - In the data declaration for `StupidConstraint' + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Functor StupidConstraint’: + Data type ‛StupidConstraint’ must not have a class context (Eq a) + In the data declaration for ‛StupidConstraint’ drvfail-functor2.hs:26:14: No instance for (Functor NoFunctor) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail005.stderr b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail005.stderr index 327eb7c3ce..c77f904dc2 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail005.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail005.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -
-drvfail005.hs:4:13:
- Can't make a derived instance of `Show a (Test a)':
- `Show a' is not a class
- In the data declaration for `Test'
+ +drvfail005.hs:4:13: + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Show a (Test a)’: + ‛Show a’ is not a class + In the data declaration for ‛Test’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail009.stderr b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail009.stderr index 7594baef39..d9592c4669 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail009.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail009.stderr @@ -1,23 +1,23 @@ -
-drvfail009.hs:10:31:
- Can't make a derived instance of `C T1'
- (even with cunning newtype deriving):
- `C' does not have arity 1
- In the newtype declaration for `T1'
-
-drvfail009.hs:13:31:
- Cannot derive well-kinded instance of form `Monad (T2 ...)'
- Class `Monad' expects an argument of kind `* -> *'
- In the newtype declaration for `T2'
-
-drvfail009.hs:16:33:
- Can't make a derived instance of `Monad T3'
- (even with cunning newtype deriving):
- cannot eta-reduce the representation type enough
- In the newtype declaration for `T3'
-
-drvfail009.hs:19:42:
- Can't make a derived instance of `Monad T4'
- (even with cunning newtype deriving):
- cannot eta-reduce the representation type enough
- In the newtype declaration for `T4'
+ +drvfail009.hs:10:31: + Can't make a derived instance of ‛C T1’ + (even with cunning newtype deriving): + ‛C’ does not have arity 1 + In the newtype declaration for ‛T1’ + +drvfail009.hs:13:31: + Cannot derive well-kinded instance of form ‛Monad (T2 ...)’ + Class ‛Monad’ expects an argument of kind ‛* -> *’ + In the newtype declaration for ‛T2’ + +drvfail009.hs:16:33: + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Monad T3’ + (even with cunning newtype deriving): + cannot eta-reduce the representation type enough + In the newtype declaration for ‛T3’ + +drvfail009.hs:19:42: + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Monad T4’ + (even with cunning newtype deriving): + cannot eta-reduce the representation type enough + In the newtype declaration for ‛T4’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail011.stderr b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail011.stderr index 9bb04bfde7..6ec1df7a03 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail011.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail011.stderr @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ drvfail011.hs:8:1: - No instance for (Eq a) arising from a use of `==' + No instance for (Eq a) arising from a use of ‛==’ Possible fix: add (Eq a) to the context of the instance declaration In the expression: ((a1 == b1)) - In an equation for `==': == (T1 a1) (T1 b1) = ((a1 == b1)) - When typechecking the code for `==' - in a standalone derived instance for `Eq (T a)': + In an equation for ‛==’: == (T1 a1) (T1 b1) = ((a1 == b1)) + When typechecking the code for ‛==’ + in a standalone derived instance for ‛Eq (T a)’: To see the code I am typechecking, use -ddump-deriv - In the instance declaration for `Eq (T a)' + In the instance declaration for ‛Eq (T a)’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail014.stderr b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail014.stderr index 47b4aabf4b..93a4c78122 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail014.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail014.stderr @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ -
-drvfail014.hs:8:28:
- Use deriving( Typeable ) on a data type declaration
- In the data declaration for `T1'
-
-drvfail014.hs:12:1:
- Derived typeable instance must be of form (Typeable2 T2)
- In the stand-alone deriving instance for
- `(Typeable a, Typeable b) => Typeable (T2 a b)'
+ +drvfail014.hs:8:28: + Use deriving( Typeable ) on a data type declaration + In the data declaration for ‛T1’ + +drvfail014.hs:12:1: + Derived typeable instance must be of form (Typeable2 T2) + In the stand-alone deriving instance for + ‛(Typeable a, Typeable b) => Typeable (T2 a b)’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail015.stderr b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail015.stderr index a7d8ac6cf1..7a755c697f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail015.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/deriving/should_fail/drvfail015.stderr @@ -1,13 +1,13 @@ -
-drvfail015.hs:10:19:
- Illegal instance declaration for `Eq T'
- (All instance types must be of the form (T t1 ... tn)
- where T is not a synonym.
- Use -XTypeSynonymInstances if you want to disable this.)
- In the stand-alone deriving instance for `Eq T'
-
-drvfail015.hs:13:1:
- Can't make a derived instance of `Eq Handle':
- The data constructors of `Handle' are not all in scope
- so you cannot derive an instance for it
- In the stand-alone deriving instance for `Eq Handle'
+ +drvfail015.hs:10:19: + Illegal instance declaration for ‛Eq T’ + (All instance types must be of the form (T t1 ... tn) + where T is not a synonym. + Use -XTypeSynonymInstances if you want to disable this.) + In the stand-alone deriving instance for ‛Eq T’ + +drvfail015.hs:13:1: + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Eq Handle’: + The data constructors of ‛Handle’ are not all in scope + so you cannot derive an instance for it + In the stand-alone deriving instance for ‛Eq Handle’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/driver/T1372/T1372.stderr b/testsuite/tests/driver/T1372/T1372.stderr index f06f294dae..e332c563a3 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/driver/T1372/T1372.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/driver/T1372/T1372.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -Main.hs:5:5: Not in scope: data constructor `T' +Main.hs:5:5: Not in scope: data constructor ‛T’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/driver/T5147/T5147.stderr b/testsuite/tests/driver/T5147/T5147.stderr index 6e8427b940..43f0f935d3 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/driver/T5147/T5147.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/driver/T5147/T5147.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ A.hs:6:15: - No instance for (Show (Fields v)) arising from a use of `show' + No instance for (Show (Fields v)) arising from a use of ‛show’ In the expression: show a - In an equation for `showField': showField a = show a + In an equation for ‛showField’: showField a = show a diff --git a/testsuite/tests/driver/T6037.stderr b/testsuite/tests/driver/T6037.stderr index 3059288d10..7b7d07ecbf 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/driver/T6037.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/driver/T6037.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ T6037.hs:5:7: - Couldn't match expected type `Int' with actual type `()' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Int’ with actual type ‛()’ In the expression: () - In an equation for `f?o': f?o = () + In an equation for ‛f?o’: f?o = () diff --git a/testsuite/tests/driver/bug1677/bug1677.stderr b/testsuite/tests/driver/bug1677/bug1677.stderr index bc55b86c2f..9ee41b5cac 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/driver/bug1677/bug1677.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/driver/bug1677/bug1677.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ Foo.hs:1:1: File name does not match module name: - Saw: `Main' - Expected: `Foo' + Saw: ‛Main’ + Expected: ‛Foo’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/driver/driver063.stderr b/testsuite/tests/driver/driver063.stderr index 0a6801537e..a50340dc42 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/driver/driver063.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/driver/driver063.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ D063.hs:2:8: - Could not find module `A063' + Could not find module ‛A063’ It is not a module in the current program, or in any known package. diff --git a/testsuite/tests/driver/recomp001/recomp001.stderr b/testsuite/tests/driver/recomp001/recomp001.stderr index 4b95415c89..bd75be7bde 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/driver/recomp001/recomp001.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/driver/recomp001/recomp001.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -C.hs:3:11: Module `B' does not export `foo' +C.hs:3:11: Module ‛B’ does not export ‛foo’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/driver/recomp005/recomp005.stderr b/testsuite/tests/driver/recomp005/recomp005.stderr index 8e4ad93832..130e56249c 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/driver/recomp005/recomp005.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/driver/recomp005/recomp005.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ C.hs:7:11: Warning: - Rule "f/g" may never fire because `f' might inline first - Probable fix: add an INLINE[n] or NOINLINE[n] pragma on `f' + Rule "f/g" may never fire because ‛f’ might inline first + Probable fix: add an INLINE[n] or NOINLINE[n] pragma on ‛f’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/driver/werror.stderr b/testsuite/tests/driver/werror.stderr index 4bad5e6b44..45c00e93ef 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/driver/werror.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/driver/werror.stderr @@ -3,14 +3,14 @@ werror.hs:6:1: Warning: Top-level binding with no type signature: main :: IO () werror.hs:7:13: Warning: - This binding for `main' shadows the existing binding + This binding for ‛main’ shadows the existing binding defined at werror.hs:6:1 -werror.hs:7:13: Warning: Defined but not used: `main' +werror.hs:7:13: Warning: Defined but not used: ‛main’ werror.hs:8:1: Warning: Tab character -werror.hs:10:1: Warning: Defined but not used: `f' +werror.hs:10:1: Warning: Defined but not used: ‛f’ werror.hs:10:1: Warning: Top-level binding with no type signature: @@ -18,11 +18,11 @@ werror.hs:10:1: Warning: werror.hs:10:1: Warning: Pattern match(es) are overlapped - In an equation for `f': f [] = ... + In an equation for ‛f’: f [] = ... werror.hs:10:1: Warning: Pattern match(es) are non-exhaustive - In an equation for `f': Patterns not matched: _ : _ + In an equation for ‛f’: Patterns not matched: _ : _ <no location info>: Failing due to -Werror. diff --git a/testsuite/tests/gadt/T3163.stderr b/testsuite/tests/gadt/T3163.stderr index b93b523441..ce64010857 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/gadt/T3163.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/gadt/T3163.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -
-T3163.hs:8:5:
- Illegal polymorphic or qualified type: forall s. s
- In the definition of data constructor `Unreached'
- In the data declaration for `Taker'
+ +T3163.hs:8:5: + Illegal polymorphic or qualified type: forall s. s + In the definition of data constructor ‛Unreached’ + In the data declaration for ‛Taker’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/gadt/T3169.stderr b/testsuite/tests/gadt/T3169.stderr index 62f49d467b..292342031a 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/gadt/T3169.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/gadt/T3169.stderr @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ T3169.hs:13:22: Could not deduce (elt ~ Map b elt) from the context (Key a, Key b) bound by the instance declaration at T3169.hs:10:10-36 - `elt' is a rigid type variable bound by + ‛elt’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for lookup :: (a, b) -> Map (a, b) elt -> Maybe elt at T3169.hs:12:3 @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ T3169.hs:13:22: (bound at T3169.hs:12:3) b :: b (bound at T3169.hs:12:13) m :: Map (a, b) elt (bound at T3169.hs:12:17) - In the second argument of `lookup', namely `m' + In the second argument of ‛lookup’, namely ‛m’ In the expression: lookup a m :: Maybe (Map b elt) In the expression: case lookup a m :: Maybe (Map b elt) of { diff --git a/testsuite/tests/gadt/T3651.stderr b/testsuite/tests/gadt/T3651.stderr index 778fe0febf..8f53dc05ef 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/gadt/T3651.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/gadt/T3651.stderr @@ -1,35 +1,35 @@ T3651.hs:11:11: - Couldn't match type `Bool' with `()' + Couldn't match type ‛Bool’ with ‛()’ Inaccessible code in - a pattern with constructor U :: Z (), in an equation for `unsafe1' + a pattern with constructor U :: Z (), in an equation for ‛unsafe1’ In the pattern: U - In an equation for `unsafe1': unsafe1 B U = () + In an equation for ‛unsafe1’: unsafe1 B U = () T3651.hs:11:15: - Couldn't match type `Bool' with `()' + Couldn't match type ‛Bool’ with ‛()’ Expected type: a Actual type: () In the expression: () - In an equation for `unsafe1': unsafe1 B U = () + In an equation for ‛unsafe1’: unsafe1 B U = () T3651.hs:14:11: - Couldn't match type `Bool' with `()' + Couldn't match type ‛Bool’ with ‛()’ Inaccessible code in - a pattern with constructor U :: Z (), in an equation for `unsafe2' + a pattern with constructor U :: Z (), in an equation for ‛unsafe2’ In the pattern: U - In an equation for `unsafe2': unsafe2 B U = () + In an equation for ‛unsafe2’: unsafe2 B U = () T3651.hs:14:15: - Couldn't match type `Bool' with `()' + Couldn't match type ‛Bool’ with ‛()’ Expected type: a Actual type: () In the expression: () - In an equation for `unsafe2': unsafe2 B U = () + In an equation for ‛unsafe2’: unsafe2 B U = () T3651.hs:17:11: - Couldn't match type `Bool' with `()' + Couldn't match type ‛Bool’ with ‛()’ Inaccessible code in - a pattern with constructor U :: Z (), in an equation for `unsafe3' + a pattern with constructor U :: Z (), in an equation for ‛unsafe3’ In the pattern: U - In an equation for `unsafe3': unsafe3 B U = True + In an equation for ‛unsafe3’: unsafe3 B U = True diff --git a/testsuite/tests/gadt/T7293.stderr b/testsuite/tests/gadt/T7293.stderr index 61cdc25f37..98a4fe402a 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/gadt/T7293.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/gadt/T7293.stderr @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ T7293.hs:24:5: - Couldn't match type 'False with 'True + Couldn't match type ‛'False’ with ‛'True’ Inaccessible code in a pattern with constructor Nil :: forall a. Vec a 'Zero, - in an equation for `nth' + in an equation for ‛nth’ In the pattern: Nil - In an equation for `nth': nth Nil _ = undefined + In an equation for ‛nth’: nth Nil _ = undefined diff --git a/testsuite/tests/gadt/T7294.stderr b/testsuite/tests/gadt/T7294.stderr index dc1eef1ca9..bfb64966fc 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/gadt/T7294.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/gadt/T7294.stderr @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ T7294.hs:25:5: Warning: - Couldn't match type 'False with 'True + Couldn't match type ‛'False’ with ‛'True’ Inaccessible code in a pattern with constructor Nil :: forall a. Vec a 'Zero, - in an equation for `nth' + in an equation for ‛nth’ In the pattern: Nil - In an equation for `nth': nth Nil _ = undefined + In an equation for ‛nth’: nth Nil _ = undefined diff --git a/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadt-escape1.stderr b/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadt-escape1.stderr index 53885ffaf2..fbc1b6703a 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadt-escape1.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadt-escape1.stderr @@ -1,19 +1,19 @@ -
-gadt-escape1.hs:19:58:
- Couldn't match type `t' with `ExpGADT Int'
- `t' is untouchable
- inside the constraints (t1 ~ Int)
- bound by a pattern with constructor
- ExpInt :: Int -> ExpGADT Int,
- in a case alternative
- at gadt-escape1.hs:19:43-50
- `t' is a rigid type variable bound by
- the inferred type of weird1 :: t at gadt-escape1.hs:19:1
- Expected type: t
- Actual type: ExpGADT t1
- Relevant bindings include
- weird1 :: t (bound at gadt-escape1.hs:19:1)
- In the expression: a
- In a case alternative: Hidden (ExpInt _) a -> a
- In the expression:
- case (hval :: Hidden) of { Hidden (ExpInt _) a -> a }
+ +gadt-escape1.hs:19:58: + Couldn't match type ‛t’ with ‛ExpGADT Int’ + ‛t’ is untouchable + inside the constraints (t1 ~ Int) + bound by a pattern with constructor + ExpInt :: Int -> ExpGADT Int, + in a case alternative + at gadt-escape1.hs:19:43-50 + ‛t’ is a rigid type variable bound by + the inferred type of weird1 :: t at gadt-escape1.hs:19:1 + Expected type: t + Actual type: ExpGADT t1 + Relevant bindings include + weird1 :: t (bound at gadt-escape1.hs:19:1) + In the expression: a + In a case alternative: Hidden (ExpInt _) a -> a + In the expression: + case (hval :: Hidden) of { Hidden (ExpInt _) a -> a } diff --git a/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadt10.stderr b/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadt10.stderr index e244eca056..fa485aade5 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadt10.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadt10.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -
-gadt10.hs:6:24:
- Expecting one more argument to `RInt'
- Expected kind `*', but `RInt' has kind `k0 -> *'
- In the type `RInt'
- In the definition of data constructor `R'
- In the data declaration for `RInt'
+ +gadt10.hs:6:24: + Expecting one more argument to ‛RInt’ + Expected kind ‛*’, but ‛RInt’ has kind ‛k0 -> *’ + In the type ‛RInt’ + In the definition of data constructor ‛R’ + In the data declaration for ‛RInt’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadt11.stderr b/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadt11.stderr index bfe38d43b3..96f636c0a6 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadt11.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadt11.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ -
-gadt11.hs:9:3:
- Data constructor `B1' returns type `X []'
- instead of an instance of its parent type `B a'
- In the definition of data constructor `B1'
- In the data declaration for `B'
+ +gadt11.hs:9:3: + Data constructor ‛B1’ returns type ‛X []’ + instead of an instance of its parent type ‛B a’ + In the definition of data constructor ‛B1’ + In the data declaration for ‛B’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadt13.stderr b/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadt13.stderr index b03ff492fa..3b39f07b8f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadt13.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadt13.stderr @@ -1,16 +1,16 @@ -
-gadt13.hs:15:13:
- Couldn't match expected type `t'
- with actual type `String -> [Char]'
- `t' is untouchable
- inside the constraints (t1 ~ Int)
- bound by a pattern with constructor
- I :: Int -> Term Int,
- in an equation for `shw'
- at gadt13.hs:15:6-8
- `t' is a rigid type variable bound by
- the inferred type of shw :: Term t1 -> t at gadt13.hs:15:1
- Relevant bindings include
- shw :: Term t1 -> t (bound at gadt13.hs:15:1)
- In the expression: ("I " ++) . shows t
- In an equation for `shw': shw (I t) = ("I " ++) . shows t
+ +gadt13.hs:15:13: + Couldn't match expected type ‛t’ + with actual type ‛String -> [Char]’ + ‛t’ is untouchable + inside the constraints (t1 ~ Int) + bound by a pattern with constructor + I :: Int -> Term Int, + in an equation for ‛shw’ + at gadt13.hs:15:6-8 + ‛t’ is a rigid type variable bound by + the inferred type of shw :: Term t1 -> t at gadt13.hs:15:1 + Relevant bindings include + shw :: Term t1 -> t (bound at gadt13.hs:15:1) + In the expression: ("I " ++) . shows t + In an equation for ‛shw’: shw (I t) = ("I " ++) . shows t diff --git a/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadt21.stderr b/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadt21.stderr index 061c563465..0293eaafb8 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadt21.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadt21.stderr @@ -1,20 +1,19 @@ gadt21.hs:21:60: - Could not deduce (Ord a1) arising from a use of `f' + Could not deduce (Ord a1) arising from a use of ‛f’ from the context (a ~ Set a1) bound by a pattern with constructor TypeSet :: forall a. Type a -> Type (Set a), - in an equation for `withOrdDynExpr' + in an equation for ‛withOrdDynExpr’ at gadt21.hs:21:35-43 Possible fix: add (Ord a1) to the context of - the data constructor `TypeSet' - or the data constructor `DynExpr' + the data constructor ‛TypeSet’ + or the data constructor ‛DynExpr’ or the type signature for withOrdDynExpr :: DynExpr - -> (forall a. Ord a => Expr a -> b) - -> Maybe b - In the first argument of `Just', namely `(f e)' + -> (forall a. Ord a => Expr a -> b) -> Maybe b + In the first argument of ‛Just’, namely ‛(f e)’ In the expression: Just (f e) - In an equation for `withOrdDynExpr': + In an equation for ‛withOrdDynExpr’: withOrdDynExpr (DynExpr e@(Const (TypeSet _) _)) f = Just (f e) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadt7.stderr b/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadt7.stderr index 561b0b52b7..186bfd33fb 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadt7.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadt7.stderr @@ -1,20 +1,20 @@ -
-gadt7.hs:16:38:
- Couldn't match expected type `t' with actual type `t1'
- `t1' is untouchable
- inside the constraints (t2 ~ Int)
- bound by a pattern with constructor
- K :: T Int,
- in a case alternative
- at gadt7.hs:16:33
- `t1' is a rigid type variable bound by
- the inferred type of i1b :: T t2 -> t1 -> t at gadt7.hs:16:1
- `t' is a rigid type variable bound by
- the inferred type of i1b :: T t2 -> t1 -> t at gadt7.hs:16:1
- Relevant bindings include
- i1b :: T t2 -> t1 -> t (bound at gadt7.hs:16:1)
- y :: t1 (bound at gadt7.hs:16:7)
- y1 :: t1 (bound at gadt7.hs:16:16)
- In the expression: y1
- In a case alternative: K -> y1
- In the expression: case t1 of { K -> y1 }
+ +gadt7.hs:16:38: + Couldn't match expected type ‛t’ with actual type ‛t1’ + ‛t1’ is untouchable + inside the constraints (t2 ~ Int) + bound by a pattern with constructor + K :: T Int, + in a case alternative + at gadt7.hs:16:33 + ‛t1’ is a rigid type variable bound by + the inferred type of i1b :: T t2 -> t1 -> t at gadt7.hs:16:1 + ‛t’ is a rigid type variable bound by + the inferred type of i1b :: T t2 -> t1 -> t at gadt7.hs:16:1 + Relevant bindings include + i1b :: T t2 -> t1 -> t (bound at gadt7.hs:16:1) + y :: t1 (bound at gadt7.hs:16:7) + y1 :: t1 (bound at gadt7.hs:16:16) + In the expression: y1 + In a case alternative: K -> y1 + In the expression: case t1 of { K -> y1 } diff --git a/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadtSyntaxFail001.stderr b/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadtSyntaxFail001.stderr index aa837b7a89..53b198a14d 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadtSyntaxFail001.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadtSyntaxFail001.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ -
-gadtSyntaxFail001.hs:8:5:
- Data constructor `C2' has existential type variables, a context, or a specialised result type
- (Use -XExistentialQuantification or -XGADTs to allow this)
- In the definition of data constructor `C2'
- In the data declaration for `Foo'
+ +gadtSyntaxFail001.hs:8:5: + Data constructor ‛C2’ has existential type variables, a context, or a specialised result type + (Use -XExistentialQuantification or -XGADTs to allow this) + In the definition of data constructor ‛C2’ + In the data declaration for ‛Foo’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadtSyntaxFail002.stderr b/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadtSyntaxFail002.stderr index a2b101a977..ca1060d8ee 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadtSyntaxFail002.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadtSyntaxFail002.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ -
-gadtSyntaxFail002.hs:8:5:
- Data constructor `C2' has existential type variables, a context, or a specialised result type
- (Use -XExistentialQuantification or -XGADTs to allow this)
- In the definition of data constructor `C2'
- In the data declaration for `Foo'
+ +gadtSyntaxFail002.hs:8:5: + Data constructor ‛C2’ has existential type variables, a context, or a specialised result type + (Use -XExistentialQuantification or -XGADTs to allow this) + In the definition of data constructor ‛C2’ + In the data declaration for ‛Foo’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadtSyntaxFail003.stderr b/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadtSyntaxFail003.stderr index 3cd4611cd3..eb2e370a66 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadtSyntaxFail003.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/gadt/gadtSyntaxFail003.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ -
-gadtSyntaxFail003.hs:7:5:
- Data constructor `C1' has existential type variables, a context, or a specialised result type
- (Use -XExistentialQuantification or -XGADTs to allow this)
- In the definition of data constructor `C1'
- In the data declaration for `Foo'
+ +gadtSyntaxFail003.hs:7:5: + Data constructor ‛C1’ has existential type variables, a context, or a specialised result type + (Use -XExistentialQuantification or -XGADTs to allow this) + In the definition of data constructor ‛C1’ + In the data declaration for ‛Foo’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/gadt/lazypat.stderr b/testsuite/tests/gadt/lazypat.stderr index d64f40e487..460c600b35 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/gadt/lazypat.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/gadt/lazypat.stderr @@ -4,4 +4,4 @@ lazypat.hs:7:5: inside a lazy (~) pattern In the pattern: T x f In the pattern: ~(T x f) - In an equation for `f': f ~(T x f) = f x + In an equation for ‛f’: f ~(T x f) = f x diff --git a/testsuite/tests/gadt/records-fail1.stderr b/testsuite/tests/gadt/records-fail1.stderr index 829114e51f..690649d46b 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/gadt/records-fail1.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/gadt/records-fail1.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -
-records-fail1.hs:7:1:
- Constructors T1 and T4 have a common field `x',
- but have different result types
- In the data declaration for `T'
+ +records-fail1.hs:7:1: + Constructors T1 and T4 have a common field ‛x’, + but have different result types + In the data declaration for ‛T’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/gadt/rw.stderr b/testsuite/tests/gadt/rw.stderr index ef5453ca6f..584c94475b 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/gadt/rw.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/gadt/rw.stderr @@ -1,20 +1,20 @@ rw.hs:14:47: - Couldn't match expected type `a' with actual type `Int' - `a' is a rigid type variable bound by + Couldn't match expected type ‛a’ with actual type ‛Int’ + ‛a’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for writeInt :: T a -> IORef a -> IO () at rw.hs:12:12 Relevant bindings include writeInt :: T a -> IORef a -> IO () (bound at rw.hs:13:1) v :: T a (bound at rw.hs:13:10) ref :: IORef a (bound at rw.hs:13:12) - In the second argument of `writeIORef', namely `(1 :: Int)' + In the second argument of ‛writeIORef’, namely ‛(1 :: Int)’ In the expression: writeIORef ref (1 :: Int) In a case alternative: ~(Li x) -> writeIORef ref (1 :: Int) rw.hs:19:51: - Couldn't match type `a' with `Bool' - `a' is a rigid type variable bound by + Couldn't match type ‛a’ with ‛Bool’ + ‛a’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for readBool :: T a -> IORef a -> IO () at rw.hs:16:12 Expected type: a -> Bool @@ -23,6 +23,6 @@ rw.hs:19:51: readBool :: T a -> IORef a -> IO () (bound at rw.hs:17:1) v :: T a (bound at rw.hs:17:10) ref :: IORef a (bound at rw.hs:17:12) - In the second argument of `(.)', namely `not' - In the second argument of `(>>=)', namely `(print . not)' + In the second argument of ‛(.)’, namely ‛not’ + In the second argument of ‛(>>=)’, namely ‛(print . not)’ In the expression: readIORef ref >>= (print . not) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep0.stderr b/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep0.stderr index 291ab14b5f..d216a703b3 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep0.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep0.stderr @@ -3,21 +3,21 @@ GenCannotDoRep0.hs:6:14: Warning: -XDatatypeContexts is deprecated: It was widely considered a misfeature, and has been removed from the Haskell language. GenCannotDoRep0.hs:13:45: - Can't make a derived instance of `Generic Dynamic': + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Generic Dynamic’: Dynamic must be a vanilla data constructor - In the data declaration for `Dynamic' + In the data declaration for ‛Dynamic’ GenCannotDoRep0.hs:17:1: - Can't make a derived instance of `Generic (P Int)': + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Generic (P Int)’: P must not be instantiated; try deriving `P a' instead - In the stand-alone deriving instance for `Generic (P Int)' + In the stand-alone deriving instance for ‛Generic (P Int)’ GenCannotDoRep0.hs:26:1: - Can't make a derived instance of `Generic (D Char Char)': + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Generic (D Char Char)’: D must not be instantiated; try deriving `D Char b' instead - In the stand-alone deriving instance for `Generic (D Char Char)' + In the stand-alone deriving instance for ‛Generic (D Char Char)’ GenCannotDoRep0.hs:28:1: - Can't make a derived instance of `Generic (D Int a)': + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Generic (D Int a)’: D must not have a datatype context - In the stand-alone deriving instance for `Generic (D Int a)' + In the stand-alone deriving instance for ‛Generic (D Int a)’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1.stderr b/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1.stderr index dde1d5b0d8..7e0f124b1e 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ -
-GenCannotDoRep1.hs:1:29: Warning:
- -XDatatypeContexts is deprecated: It was widely considered a misfeature, and has been removed from the Haskell language.
-
-GenCannotDoRep1.hs:8:49:
- Can't make a derived instance of `Generic (Context a)':
- Context must not have a datatype context
- In the data declaration for `Context'
+ +GenCannotDoRep1.hs:1:29: Warning: + -XDatatypeContexts is deprecated: It was widely considered a misfeature, and has been removed from the Haskell language. + +GenCannotDoRep1.hs:8:49: + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Generic (Context a)’: + Context must not have a datatype context + In the data declaration for ‛Context’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_0.stderr b/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_0.stderr index 2e602af0e6..c75205a380 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_0.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_0.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ GenCannotDoRep1_0.hs:9:49: - Can't make a derived instance of `Generic1 Dynamic': + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Generic1 Dynamic’: Dynamic must be a vanilla data constructor - In the data declaration for `Dynamic' + In the data declaration for ‛Dynamic’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_1.stderr b/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_1.stderr index df9f518c67..97eeca51a9 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_1.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_1.stderr @@ -3,6 +3,6 @@ GenCannotDoRep1_1.hs:1:29: Warning: -XDatatypeContexts is deprecated: It was widely considered a misfeature, and has been removed from the Haskell language. GenCannotDoRep1_1.hs:8:49: - Can't make a derived instance of `Generic1 Context': + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Generic1 Context’: Context must not have a datatype context - In the data declaration for `Context' + In the data declaration for ‛Context’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_2.stderr b/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_2.stderr index ffda5ffd2c..32aebb7fc9 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_2.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_2.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ GenCannotDoRep1_2.hs:13:1: - Can't make a derived instance of `Generic1 Term': + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Generic1 Term’: Int must be a vanilla data constructor - In the stand-alone deriving instance for `Generic1 Term' + In the stand-alone deriving instance for ‛Generic1 Term’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_3.stderr b/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_3.stderr index 7312a95158..7e54463ff5 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_3.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_3.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ GenCannotDoRep1_3.hs:11:33: - Can't make a derived instance of `Generic1 T': - Constructor `T' must use the last type parameter only as the last argument of a data type, newtype, or (->) - In the data declaration for `T' + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Generic1 T’: + Constructor ‛T’ must use the last type parameter only as the last argument of a data type, newtype, or (->) + In the data declaration for ‛T’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_4.stderr b/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_4.stderr index 2a8d2a699b..e4b39838d6 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_4.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_4.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ GenCannotDoRep1_4.hs:8:34: - Can't make a derived instance of `Generic1 T': - Constructor `T' must use the last type parameter only as the last argument of a data type, newtype, or (->) - In the data declaration for `T' + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Generic1 T’: + Constructor ‛T’ must use the last type parameter only as the last argument of a data type, newtype, or (->) + In the data declaration for ‛T’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_5.stderr b/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_5.stderr index 13d25089a5..21e849098c 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_5.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_5.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ GenCannotDoRep1_5.hs:9:32: - Can't make a derived instance of `Generic1 T': - Constructor `T' must use the last type parameter only as the last argument of a data type, newtype, or (->) - In the data declaration for `T' + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Generic1 T’: + Constructor ‛T’ must use the last type parameter only as the last argument of a data type, newtype, or (->) + In the data declaration for ‛T’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_6.stderr b/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_6.stderr index 16b822e1c1..06d95b223e 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_6.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_6.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ GenCannotDoRep1_6.hs:9:43: - Can't make a derived instance of `Generic1 T': - Constructor `T' must use the last type parameter only as the last argument of a data type, newtype, or (->) - In the data declaration for `T' + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Generic1 T’: + Constructor ‛T’ must use the last type parameter only as the last argument of a data type, newtype, or (->) + In the data declaration for ‛T’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_7.stderr b/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_7.stderr index 3b6af68fb0..2830a6d774 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_7.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_7.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ GenCannotDoRep1_7.hs:11:29: - Can't make a derived instance of `Generic1 T': + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Generic1 T’: must not apply type constructors that cannot be represented with `Rep1' (such as `B') to arguments that involve the last type parameter - In the data declaration for `T' + In the data declaration for ‛T’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_8.stderr b/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_8.stderr index c0d6929071..305944471f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_8.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep1_8.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ GenCannotDoRep1_8.hs:12:30: - Can't make a derived instance of `Generic1 T': - Constructor `T' must use the last type parameter only as the last argument of a data type, newtype, or (->) - In the data declaration for `T' + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Generic1 T’: + Constructor ‛T’ must use the last type parameter only as the last argument of a data type, newtype, or (->) + In the data declaration for ‛T’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep2.stderr b/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep2.stderr index 35caf2c3b4..635102310a 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep2.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/generics/GenCannotDoRep2.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ GenCannotDoRep2.hs:13:1: - Can't make a derived instance of `Generic (Term a)': + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Generic (Term a)’: Int must be a vanilla data constructor - In the stand-alone deriving instance for `Generic (Term a)' + In the stand-alone deriving instance for ‛Generic (Term a)’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/generics/GenShouldFail0.stderr b/testsuite/tests/generics/GenShouldFail0.stderr index 3685e67784..f85cd92894 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/generics/GenShouldFail0.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/generics/GenShouldFail0.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ GenShouldFail0.hs:9:1: - Can't make a derived instance of `Generic X': + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Generic X’: You need -XDeriveGeneric to derive an instance for this class - In the stand-alone deriving instance for `Generic X' + In the stand-alone deriving instance for ‛Generic X’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/generics/GenShouldFail1_0.stderr b/testsuite/tests/generics/GenShouldFail1_0.stderr index 9b7ba3ef07..00779d00ea 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/generics/GenShouldFail1_0.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/generics/GenShouldFail1_0.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ GenShouldFail1_0.hs:9:1: - Can't make a derived instance of `Generic1 X': + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Generic1 X’: You need -XDeriveGeneric to derive an instance for this class - In the stand-alone deriving instance for `Generic1 X' + In the stand-alone deriving instance for ‛Generic1 X’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/ghc-api/apirecomp001/apirecomp001.stderr b/testsuite/tests/ghc-api/apirecomp001/apirecomp001.stderr index 920a10a79e..b7666b7a4f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/ghc-api/apirecomp001/apirecomp001.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/ghc-api/apirecomp001/apirecomp001.stderr @@ -4,12 +4,12 @@ B.hs:4:1: Warning: answer_to_live_the_universe_and_everything :: Int B.hs:5:12: Warning: - Defaulting the following constraint(s) to type `Integer' + Defaulting the following constraint(s) to type ‛Integer’ (Enum a0) - arising from the arithmetic sequence `1 .. 23 * 2' at B.hs:5:12-20 - (Num a0) arising from the literal `1' at B.hs:5:13 - In the first argument of `length', namely `[1 .. 23 * 2]' - In the first argument of `(-)', namely `length [1 .. 23 * 2]' + arising from the arithmetic sequence ‛1 .. 23 * 2’ at B.hs:5:12-20 + (Num a0) arising from the literal ‛1’ at B.hs:5:13 + In the first argument of ‛length’, namely ‛[1 .. 23 * 2]’ + In the first argument of ‛(-)’, namely ‛length [1 .. 23 * 2]’ In the expression: length [1 .. 23 * 2] - 4 A.hs:7:1: Warning: @@ -20,12 +20,12 @@ B.hs:4:1: Warning: answer_to_live_the_universe_and_everything :: Int B.hs:5:12: Warning: - Defaulting the following constraint(s) to type `Integer' + Defaulting the following constraint(s) to type ‛Integer’ (Enum a0) - arising from the arithmetic sequence `1 .. 23 * 2' at B.hs:5:12-20 - (Num a0) arising from the literal `1' at B.hs:5:13 - In the first argument of `length', namely `[1 .. 23 * 2]' - In the first argument of `(-)', namely `length [1 .. 23 * 2]' + arising from the arithmetic sequence ‛1 .. 23 * 2’ at B.hs:5:12-20 + (Num a0) arising from the literal ‛1’ at B.hs:5:13 + In the first argument of ‛length’, namely ‛[1 .. 23 * 2]’ + In the first argument of ‛(-)’, namely ‛length [1 .. 23 * 2]’ In the expression: length [1 .. 23 * 2] - 4 A.hs:7:1: Warning: diff --git a/testsuite/tests/ghc-e/should_run/T2636.stderr b/testsuite/tests/ghc-e/should_run/T2636.stderr index 369890fa2e..dbe70becec 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/ghc-e/should_run/T2636.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/ghc-e/should_run/T2636.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ T2636.hs:1:8: - Could not find module `MissingModule' + Could not find module ‛MissingModule’ Use -v to see a list of the files searched for. diff --git a/testsuite/tests/ghci.debugger/scripts/break003.stderr b/testsuite/tests/ghci.debugger/scripts/break003.stderr index fc7bb337d1..c1dda071d5 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/ghci.debugger/scripts/break003.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/ghci.debugger/scripts/break003.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ <interactive>:5:1: - No instance for (Show (t -> t1)) arising from a use of `print' + No instance for (Show (t -> t1)) arising from a use of ‛print’ In a stmt of an interactive GHCi command: print it diff --git a/testsuite/tests/ghci.debugger/scripts/break006.stderr b/testsuite/tests/ghci.debugger/scripts/break006.stderr index 9543d675e2..7e22617185 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/ghci.debugger/scripts/break006.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/ghci.debugger/scripts/break006.stderr @@ -1,26 +1,26 @@ <interactive>:6:1: - No instance for (Show t1) arising from a use of `print' - Cannot resolve unknown runtime type `t1' + No instance for (Show t1) arising from a use of ‛print’ + Cannot resolve unknown runtime type ‛t1’ Use :print or :force to determine these types Relevant bindings include it :: t1 (bound at <interactive>:6:1) Note: there are several potential instances: - instance Show Double -- Defined in `GHC.Float' - instance Show Float -- Defined in `GHC.Float' + instance Show Double -- Defined in ‛GHC.Float’ + instance Show Float -- Defined in ‛GHC.Float’ instance (Integral a, Show a) => Show (GHC.Real.Ratio a) - -- Defined in `GHC.Real' + -- Defined in ‛GHC.Real’ ...plus 23 others In a stmt of an interactive GHCi command: print it <interactive>:8:1: - No instance for (Show t1) arising from a use of `print' - Cannot resolve unknown runtime type `t1' + No instance for (Show t1) arising from a use of ‛print’ + Cannot resolve unknown runtime type ‛t1’ Use :print or :force to determine these types Relevant bindings include it :: t1 (bound at <interactive>:8:1) Note: there are several potential instances: - instance Show Double -- Defined in `GHC.Float' - instance Show Float -- Defined in `GHC.Float' + instance Show Double -- Defined in ‛GHC.Float’ + instance Show Float -- Defined in ‛GHC.Float’ instance (Integral a, Show a) => Show (GHC.Real.Ratio a) - -- Defined in `GHC.Real' + -- Defined in ‛GHC.Real’ ...plus 23 others In a stmt of an interactive GHCi command: print it diff --git a/testsuite/tests/ghci.debugger/scripts/break019.stderr b/testsuite/tests/ghci.debugger/scripts/break019.stderr index fe27afda19..41ec1e89e3 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/ghci.debugger/scripts/break019.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/ghci.debugger/scripts/break019.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -
-Top level: Not in scope: data constructor `Test2'
+ +Top level: Not in scope: data constructor ‛Test2’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/ghci.debugger/scripts/dynbrk001.stderr b/testsuite/tests/ghci.debugger/scripts/dynbrk001.stderr index adb8dca658..ebc73e5d82 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/ghci.debugger/scripts/dynbrk001.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/ghci.debugger/scripts/dynbrk001.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ <no location info>: - Could not find module `NonModule' + Could not find module ‛NonModule’ It is not a module in the current program, or in any known package. diff --git a/testsuite/tests/ghci.debugger/scripts/dynbrk001.stdout b/testsuite/tests/ghci.debugger/scripts/dynbrk001.stdout index 3d8780cee7..358f44990c 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/ghci.debugger/scripts/dynbrk001.stdout +++ b/testsuite/tests/ghci.debugger/scripts/dynbrk001.stdout @@ -2,4 +2,4 @@ Breakpoint 1 does not exist No breakpoints found at that location. No active breakpoints. [4,8,15,16,23,42] -map :: forall a b. (a -> b) -> [a] -> [b] -- Defined in `GHC.Base' +map :: forall a b. (a -> b) -> [a] -> [b] -- Defined in ‛GHC.Base’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/ghci.debugger/scripts/print019.stderr b/testsuite/tests/ghci.debugger/scripts/print019.stderr index e5bcb7f1c4..3473c99dd9 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/ghci.debugger/scripts/print019.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/ghci.debugger/scripts/print019.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ <interactive>:11:1: - No instance for (Show a1) arising from a use of `print' - Cannot resolve unknown runtime type `a1' + No instance for (Show a1) arising from a use of ‛print’ + Cannot resolve unknown runtime type ‛a1’ Use :print or :force to determine these types Relevant bindings include it :: a1 (bound at <interactive>:11:1) Note: there are several potential instances: diff --git a/testsuite/tests/ghci.debugger/scripts/print020.stderr b/testsuite/tests/ghci.debugger/scripts/print020.stderr index 296718daec..6642bb7baa 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/ghci.debugger/scripts/print020.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/ghci.debugger/scripts/print020.stderr @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ GenericTemplate.hs:219:14: Warning: Pattern bindings containing unlifted types should use an outermost bang pattern: sts1@((HappyCons (st1@(action)) (_))) = happyDrop k (HappyCons (st) (sts)) - In an equation for `happyMonadReduce': + In an equation for ‛happyMonadReduce’: happyMonadReduce k nt fn j tk st sts stk = happyThen1 (fn stk tk) @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ GenericTemplate.hs:226:14: Warning: Pattern bindings containing unlifted types should use an outermost bang pattern: sts1@((HappyCons (st1@(action)) (_))) = happyDrop k (HappyCons (st) (sts)) - In an equation for `happyMonad2Reduce': + In an equation for ‛happyMonad2Reduce’: happyMonad2Reduce k nt fn j tk st sts stk = happyThen1 (fn stk tk) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/ghci/prog006/prog006.stderr b/testsuite/tests/ghci/prog006/prog006.stderr index 472272a01e..53c82d5466 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/ghci/prog006/prog006.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/ghci/prog006/prog006.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ Boot.hs:5:13: - Not a data constructor: `forall' + Not a data constructor: ‛forall’ Perhaps you intended to use -XExistentialQuantification diff --git a/testsuite/tests/ghci/prog009/ghci.prog009.stderr b/testsuite/tests/ghci/prog009/ghci.prog009.stderr index e63a322c2d..bf608499bb 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/ghci/prog009/ghci.prog009.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/ghci/prog009/ghci.prog009.stderr @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ A.hs:1:16: parse error on input `where' <interactive>:26:1: - Not in scope: `yan' - Perhaps you meant `tan' (imported from Prelude) + Not in scope: ‛yan’ + Perhaps you meant ‛tan’ (imported from Prelude) A.hs:1:16: parse error on input `where' diff --git a/testsuite/tests/ghci/prog012/prog012.stderr b/testsuite/tests/ghci/prog012/prog012.stderr index 71f2bbeb01..db122d9c64 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/ghci/prog012/prog012.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/ghci/prog012/prog012.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -Bar.hs:3:7: Not in scope: `nonexistent' +Bar.hs:3:7: Not in scope: ‛nonexistent’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/T2452.stderr b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/T2452.stderr index 2802ee2bdf..a2fa4fc8a5 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/T2452.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/T2452.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -<interactive>:1:1: Not in scope: `System.IO.hPutStrLn' +<interactive>:1:1: Not in scope: ‛System.IO.hPutStrLn’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/T2816.stderr b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/T2816.stderr index 3a9e972205..ba4c1bd955 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/T2816.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/T2816.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -<interactive>:2:1: Not in scope: `α' +<interactive>:2:1: Not in scope: ‛α’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/T4127a.stderr b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/T4127a.stderr index 970b6db0a2..cc118a9e20 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/T4127a.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/T4127a.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ <interactive>:3:68: - Multiple declarations of `f' + Multiple declarations of ‛f’ Declared at: <interactive>:3:32 <interactive>:3:68 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/T5545.stdout b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/T5545.stdout index 8c7c69ad58..8ba680a5cb 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/T5545.stdout +++ b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/T5545.stdout @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -($!) :: (a -> b) -> a -> b -- Defined in `Prelude' +($!) :: (a -> b) -> a -> b -- Defined in ‛Prelude’ infixr 0 $! diff --git a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/T5564.stderr b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/T5564.stderr index d76c4df788..6fb94e4f13 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/T5564.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/T5564.stderr @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ <interactive>:3:1: - Not in scope: `git' - Perhaps you meant `it' (line 2) + Not in scope: ‛git’ + Perhaps you meant ‛it’ (line 2) <interactive>:5:1: - Not in scope: `fit' + Not in scope: ‛fit’ Perhaps you meant one of these: - `it' (line 4), `fst' (imported from Prelude) + ‛it’ (line 4), ‛fst’ (imported from Prelude) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/T5836.stderr b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/T5836.stderr index 9b0cfc65eb..5bd37b5c00 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/T5836.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/T5836.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ <no location info>: - Could not find module `Does.Not.Exist' + Could not find module ‛Does.Not.Exist’ It is not a module in the current program, or in any known package. diff --git a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/T5979.stderr b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/T5979.stderr index 84f8c6ba0b..b4cd884928 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/T5979.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/T5979.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ <no location info>: - Could not find module `Control.Monad.Trans.State' + Could not find module ‛Control.Monad.Trans.State’ It is not a module in the current program, or in any known package. diff --git a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/T6007.stderr b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/T6007.stderr index b461ef19bf..695d25b3ad 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/T6007.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/T6007.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ <interactive>:1:19: - Module `System.IO' does not export `does_not_exist' + Module ‛System.IO’ does not export ‛does_not_exist’ <interactive>:1:20: - Module `Data.Maybe' does not export `does_not_exist' + Module ‛Data.Maybe’ does not export ‛does_not_exist’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci008.stdout b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci008.stdout index cac9db2c41..9eaf1dc961 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci008.stdout +++ b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci008.stdout @@ -1,18 +1,18 @@ class Num a where (+) :: a -> a -> a ... - -- Defined in `GHC.Num' + -- Defined in ‛GHC.Num’ infixl 6 + class Num a where (+) :: a -> a -> a ... - -- Defined in `GHC.Num' + -- Defined in ‛GHC.Num’ infixl 6 + data Data.Complex.Complex a = !a Data.Complex.:+ !a - -- Defined in `Data.Complex' + -- Defined in ‛Data.Complex’ infix 6 Data.Complex.:+ data Data.Complex.Complex a = !a Data.Complex.:+ !a - -- Defined in `Data.Complex' + -- Defined in ‛Data.Complex’ infix 6 Data.Complex.:+ class (RealFrac a, Floating a) => RealFloat a where floatRadix :: a -> Integer @@ -29,8 +29,8 @@ class (RealFrac a, Floating a) => RealFloat a where isNegativeZero :: a -> Bool isIEEE :: a -> Bool atan2 :: a -> a -> a - -- Defined in `GHC.Float' -instance RealFloat Float -- Defined in `GHC.Float' -instance RealFloat Double -- Defined in `GHC.Float' + -- Defined in ‛GHC.Float’ +instance RealFloat Float -- Defined in ‛GHC.Float’ +instance RealFloat Double -- Defined in ‛GHC.Float’ Data.List.isPrefixOf :: Eq a => [a] -> [a] -> Bool - -- Defined in `Data.List' + -- Defined in ‛Data.List’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci011.stdout b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci011.stdout index caed5d0f0c..540572ea81 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci011.stdout +++ b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci011.stdout @@ -1,22 +1,22 @@ -data [] a = [] | a : [a] -- Defined in `GHC.Types' -instance Eq a => Eq [a] -- Defined in `GHC.Classes' -instance Monad [] -- Defined in `GHC.Base' -instance Functor [] -- Defined in `GHC.Base' -instance Ord a => Ord [a] -- Defined in `GHC.Classes' -instance Read a => Read [a] -- Defined in `GHC.Read' -instance Show a => Show [a] -- Defined in `GHC.Show' -data () = () -- Defined in `GHC.Tuple' -instance Bounded () -- Defined in `GHC.Enum' -instance Enum () -- Defined in `GHC.Enum' -instance Eq () -- Defined in `GHC.Classes' -instance Ord () -- Defined in `GHC.Classes' -instance Read () -- Defined in `GHC.Read' -instance Show () -- Defined in `GHC.Show' -data (,) a b = (,) a b -- Defined in `GHC.Tuple' +data [] a = [] | a : [a] -- Defined in ‛GHC.Types’ +instance Eq a => Eq [a] -- Defined in ‛GHC.Classes’ +instance Monad [] -- Defined in ‛GHC.Base’ +instance Functor [] -- Defined in ‛GHC.Base’ +instance Ord a => Ord [a] -- Defined in ‛GHC.Classes’ +instance Read a => Read [a] -- Defined in ‛GHC.Read’ +instance Show a => Show [a] -- Defined in ‛GHC.Show’ +data () = () -- Defined in ‛GHC.Tuple’ +instance Bounded () -- Defined in ‛GHC.Enum’ +instance Enum () -- Defined in ‛GHC.Enum’ +instance Eq () -- Defined in ‛GHC.Classes’ +instance Ord () -- Defined in ‛GHC.Classes’ +instance Read () -- Defined in ‛GHC.Read’ +instance Show () -- Defined in ‛GHC.Show’ +data (,) a b = (,) a b -- Defined in ‛GHC.Tuple’ instance (Bounded a, Bounded b) => Bounded (a, b) - -- Defined in `GHC.Enum' -instance (Eq a, Eq b) => Eq (a, b) -- Defined in `GHC.Classes' -instance Functor ((,) a) -- Defined in `GHC.Base' -instance (Ord a, Ord b) => Ord (a, b) -- Defined in `GHC.Classes' -instance (Read a, Read b) => Read (a, b) -- Defined in `GHC.Read' -instance (Show a, Show b) => Show (a, b) -- Defined in `GHC.Show' + -- Defined in ‛GHC.Enum’ +instance (Eq a, Eq b) => Eq (a, b) -- Defined in ‛GHC.Classes’ +instance Functor ((,) a) -- Defined in ‛GHC.Base’ +instance (Ord a, Ord b) => Ord (a, b) -- Defined in ‛GHC.Classes’ +instance (Read a, Read b) => Read (a, b) -- Defined in ‛GHC.Read’ +instance (Show a, Show b) => Show (a, b) -- Defined in ‛GHC.Show’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci020.stdout b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci020.stdout index 333e78570a..6d621d3c1d 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci020.stdout +++ b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci020.stdout @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ -data (->) a b -- Defined in `GHC.Prim' -instance Monad ((->) r) -- Defined in `GHC.Base' -instance Functor ((->) r) -- Defined in `GHC.Base' +data (->) a b -- Defined in ‛GHC.Prim’ +instance Monad ((->) r) -- Defined in ‛GHC.Base’ +instance Functor ((->) r) -- Defined in ‛GHC.Base’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci021.stderr b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci021.stderr index ae7c75b6bb..18216b8f18 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci021.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci021.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -<no location info>: no such module: `ThisDoesNotExist' +<no location info>: no such module: ‛ThisDoesNotExist’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci034.stderr b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci034.stderr index 59501b2443..00bf3dfb67 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci034.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci034.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -Top level: Not in scope: `thisIsNotDefined' +Top level: Not in scope: ‛thisIsNotDefined’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci036.stderr b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci036.stderr index f070bdd9d2..5b53b08d29 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci036.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci036.stderr @@ -1,18 +1,18 @@ -<interactive>:1:1: Not in scope: `nubBy' +<interactive>:1:1: Not in scope: ‛nubBy’ -<interactive>:1:1: Not in scope: `nub' +<interactive>:1:1: Not in scope: ‛nub’ -<interactive>:1:1: Not in scope: `nubBy' +<interactive>:1:1: Not in scope: ‛nubBy’ -<interactive>:1:1: Not in scope: `nub' +<interactive>:1:1: Not in scope: ‛nub’ <interactive>:1:1: - Not in scope: `nub' - Perhaps you meant `L.nub' (imported from Data.List) + Not in scope: ‛nub’ + Perhaps you meant ‛L.nub’ (imported from Data.List) <interactive>:1:1: - Failed to load interface for `L' + Failed to load interface for ‛L’ Use -v to see a list of the files searched for. -<interactive>:1:1: Not in scope: `nub' +<interactive>:1:1: Not in scope: ‛nub’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci038.stderr b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci038.stderr index 5b3b85c25b..bb2fb850c8 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci038.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci038.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -<interactive>:1:1: Not in scope: `map' +<interactive>:1:1: Not in scope: ‛map’ -<interactive>:1:1: Not in scope: `x' +<interactive>:1:1: Not in scope: ‛x’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci044.stderr b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci044.stderr index a5e6a543ee..c0737d13b5 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci044.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci044.stderr @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ <interactive>:5:10: - Illegal instance declaration for `C [Int]' + Illegal instance declaration for ‛C [Int]’ (All instance types must be of the form (T a1 ... an) where a1 ... an are *distinct type variables*, and each type variable appears at most once in the instance head. Use -XFlexibleInstances if you want to disable this.) - In the instance declaration for `C [Int]' + In the instance declaration for ‛C [Int]’ <interactive>:7:10: Overlapping instance declarations: diff --git a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci047.stderr b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci047.stderr index 0051710378..c888b0492c 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci047.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci047.stderr @@ -1,16 +1,16 @@ <interactive>:38:1: - Couldn't match type `HFalse' with `HTrue' + Couldn't match type ‛HFalse’ with ‛HTrue’ Expected type: HTrue Actual type: Or HFalse HFalse In the expression: f In the expression: f $ Baz 'a' - In an equation for `it': it = f $ Baz 'a' + In an equation for ‛it’: it = f $ Baz 'a' <interactive>:39:1: - Couldn't match type `HFalse' with `HTrue' + Couldn't match type ‛HFalse’ with ‛HTrue’ Expected type: HTrue Actual type: Or HFalse HFalse In the expression: f In the expression: f $ Quz - In an equation for `it': it = f $ Quz + In an equation for ‛it’: it = f $ Quz diff --git a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci048.stderr b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci048.stderr index 408c1e9ee1..3809db88e2 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci048.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci048.stderr @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ <interactive>:4:16: - Multiple declarations of `A' + Multiple declarations of ‛A’ Declared at: <interactive>:4:12 <interactive>:4:16 <interactive>:6:16: - Multiple declarations of `A' + Multiple declarations of ‛A’ Declared at: <interactive>:6:12 <interactive>:6:16 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci050.stderr b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci050.stderr index b2e11a26ef..77c552575a 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci050.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci050.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ <interactive>:6:49: - Couldn't match expected type `ListableElem (a, a)' - with actual type `a' - `a' is a rigid type variable bound by + Couldn't match expected type ‛ListableElem (a, a)’ + with actual type ‛a’ + ‛a’ is a rigid type variable bound by the instance declaration at <interactive>:6:10 Relevant bindings include asList :: (a, a) -> [ListableElem (a, a)] @@ -11,4 +11,4 @@ b :: a (bound at <interactive>:6:43) In the expression: a In the expression: [a, b] - In an equation for `asList': asList (a, b) = [a, b] + In an equation for ‛asList’: asList (a, b) = [a, b] diff --git a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci051.stderr b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci051.stderr index 130d0012a2..aec3647664 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci051.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci051.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ <interactive>:7:9: - Couldn't match type `T' with `main::Interactive.T' + Couldn't match type ‛T’ with ‛main::Interactive.T’ Expected type: T' Actual type: T In the expression: C :: T' - In an equation for `c': c = C :: T' + In an equation for ‛c’: c = C :: T' diff --git a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci052.stderr b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci052.stderr index c685a2aaaf..2efada5344 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci052.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci052.stderr @@ -1,27 +1,27 @@ <interactive>:7:4: - Couldn't match expected type `main::Interactive.Planet' - with actual type `Planet' - In the first argument of `pn', namely `Mercury' + Couldn't match expected type ‛main::Interactive.Planet’ + with actual type ‛Planet’ + In the first argument of ‛pn’, namely ‛Mercury’ In the expression: pn Mercury - In an equation for `it': it = pn Mercury + In an equation for ‛it’: it = pn Mercury <interactive>:8:4: - Couldn't match expected type `main::Interactive.Planet' - with actual type `Planet' - In the first argument of `pn', namely `Venus' + Couldn't match expected type ‛main::Interactive.Planet’ + with actual type ‛Planet’ + In the first argument of ‛pn’, namely ‛Venus’ In the expression: pn Venus - In an equation for `it': it = pn Venus + In an equation for ‛it’: it = pn Venus <interactive>:9:4: - Couldn't match expected type `main::Interactive.Planet' - with actual type `Planet' - In the first argument of `pn', namely `Mars' + Couldn't match expected type ‛main::Interactive.Planet’ + with actual type ‛Planet’ + In the first argument of ‛pn’, namely ‛Mars’ In the expression: pn Mars - In an equation for `it': it = pn Mars + In an equation for ‛it’: it = pn Mars <interactive>:11:44: - Couldn't match expected type `Planet' - with actual type `main::Interactive.Planet' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Planet’ + with actual type ‛main::Interactive.Planet’ In the pattern: Earth - In an equation for `pn': pn Earth = "E" + In an equation for ‛pn’: pn Earth = "E" diff --git a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci053.stderr b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci053.stderr index e08ad91e21..f97df8f63c 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci053.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci053.stderr @@ -1,14 +1,14 @@ <interactive>:8:12: - Couldn't match expected type `main::Interactive.Planet' - with actual type `Planet' - In the second argument of `(==)', namely `Mercury' + Couldn't match expected type ‛main::Interactive.Planet’ + with actual type ‛Planet’ + In the second argument of ‛(==)’, namely ‛Mercury’ In the expression: mercury == Mercury - In an equation for `it': it = mercury == Mercury + In an equation for ‛it’: it = mercury == Mercury <interactive>:10:10: - Couldn't match expected type `Planet' - with actual type `main::Interactive.Planet' - In the second argument of `(==)', namely `Earth' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Planet’ + with actual type ‛main::Interactive.Planet’ + In the second argument of ‛(==)’, namely ‛Earth’ In the expression: Venus == Earth - In an equation for `it': it = Venus == Earth + In an equation for ‛it’: it = Venus == Earth diff --git a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci057.stderr b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci057.stderr index 623bfb3c37..22d0514578 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci057.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/ghci/scripts/ghci057.stderr @@ -1,17 +1,17 @@ -
-<interactive>:5:1:
- Illegal generalised algebraic data declaration for `T'
- (Use -XGADTs to allow GADTs)
- In the data declaration for `T'
-
-ghci057.hs:3:3:
- Data constructor `C' has existential type variables, a context, or a specialised result type
- (Use -XExistentialQuantification or -XGADTs to allow this)
- In the definition of data constructor `C'
- In the data declaration for `T'
-
-ghci057.hs:3:3:
- Data constructor `C' has existential type variables, a context, or a specialised result type
- (Use -XExistentialQuantification or -XGADTs to allow this)
- In the definition of data constructor `C'
- In the data declaration for `T'
+ +<interactive>:5:1: + Illegal generalised algebraic data declaration for ‛T’ + (Use -XGADTs to allow GADTs) + In the data declaration for ‛T’ + +ghci057.hs:3:3: + Data constructor ‛C’ has existential type variables, a context, or a specialised result type + (Use -XExistentialQuantification or -XGADTs to allow this) + In the definition of data constructor ‛C’ + In the data declaration for ‛T’ + +ghci057.hs:3:3: + Data constructor ‛C’ has existential type variables, a context, or a specialised result type + (Use -XExistentialQuantification or -XGADTs to allow this) + In the definition of data constructor ‛C’ + In the data declaration for ‛T’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/haddock/haddock_examples/haddock.Test.stderr b/testsuite/tests/haddock/haddock_examples/haddock.Test.stderr index 74956de414..37a2565a4e 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/haddock/haddock_examples/haddock.Test.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/haddock/haddock_examples/haddock.Test.stderr @@ -157,10 +157,10 @@ m = undefined -Test.hs:32:9: Warning: `p' is exported by `p' and `R(..)' +Test.hs:32:9: Warning: ‛p’ is exported by ‛p’ and ‛R(..)’ -Test.hs:32:12: Warning: `q' is exported by `q' and `R(..)' +Test.hs:32:12: Warning: ‛q’ is exported by ‛q’ and ‛R(..)’ -Test.hs:32:15: Warning: `u' is exported by `u' and `R(..)' +Test.hs:32:15: Warning: ‛u’ is exported by ‛u’ and ‛R(..)’ -Test.hs:38:9: Warning: `a' is exported by `a' and `C(a, b)' +Test.hs:38:9: Warning: ‛a’ is exported by ‛a’ and ‛C(a, b)’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_compile/Class3.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_compile/Class3.stderr index 4c72a425f0..6c07460745 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_compile/Class3.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_compile/Class3.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -Class3.hs:7:10: - Warning: No explicit method or default declaration for `foo' - In the instance declaration for `C ()' +Class3.hs:7:10: Warning: + No explicit method or default declaration for ‛foo’ + In the instance declaration for ‛C ()’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_compile/Simple14.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_compile/Simple14.stderr index 1665ccae83..3c761c302d 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_compile/Simple14.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_compile/Simple14.stderr @@ -1,18 +1,18 @@ Simple14.hs:17:19: - Couldn't match type `z0' with `n' - `z0' is untouchable + Couldn't match type ‛z0’ with ‛n’ + ‛z0’ is untouchable inside the constraints (Maybe m ~ Maybe n) bound by a type expected by the context: Maybe m ~ Maybe n => EQ_ z0 z0 at Simple14.hs:17:12-33 - `n' is a rigid type variable bound by + ‛n’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for foo :: EQ_ (Maybe m) (Maybe n) at Simple14.hs:16:17 Expected type: EQ_ z0 z0 Actual type: EQ_ m n Relevant bindings include foo :: EQ_ (Maybe m) (Maybe n) (bound at Simple14.hs:17:1) - In the second argument of `eqE', namely `(eqI :: EQ_ m n)' - In the first argument of `ntI', namely `(`eqE` (eqI :: EQ_ m n))' + In the second argument of ‛eqE’, namely ‛(eqI :: EQ_ m n)’ + In the first argument of ‛ntI’, namely ‛(`eqE` (eqI :: EQ_ m n))’ In the expression: ntI (`eqE` (eqI :: EQ_ m n)) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_compile/Simple2.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_compile/Simple2.stderr index ef05fb3e23..e68afd80da 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_compile/Simple2.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_compile/Simple2.stderr @@ -1,40 +1,40 @@ -Simple2.hs:21:1: - Warning: No explicit associated type or default declaration for `S3n' - In the instance declaration for `C3 Char' +Simple2.hs:21:1: Warning: + No explicit associated type or default declaration for ‛S3n’ + In the instance declaration for ‛C3 Char’ -Simple2.hs:21:10: - Warning: No explicit method or default declaration for `foo3n' - In the instance declaration for `C3 Char' +Simple2.hs:21:10: Warning: + No explicit method or default declaration for ‛foo3n’ + In the instance declaration for ‛C3 Char’ -Simple2.hs:21:10: - Warning: No explicit method or default declaration for `bar3n' - In the instance declaration for `C3 Char' +Simple2.hs:21:10: Warning: + No explicit method or default declaration for ‛bar3n’ + In the instance declaration for ‛C3 Char’ -Simple2.hs:29:1: - Warning: No explicit associated type or default declaration for `S3n' - In the instance declaration for `C3 Bool' +Simple2.hs:29:1: Warning: + No explicit associated type or default declaration for ‛S3n’ + In the instance declaration for ‛C3 Bool’ -Simple2.hs:29:10: - Warning: No explicit method or default declaration for `foo3n' - In the instance declaration for `C3 Bool' +Simple2.hs:29:10: Warning: + No explicit method or default declaration for ‛foo3n’ + In the instance declaration for ‛C3 Bool’ -Simple2.hs:29:10: - Warning: No explicit method or default declaration for `bar3n' - In the instance declaration for `C3 Bool' +Simple2.hs:29:10: Warning: + No explicit method or default declaration for ‛bar3n’ + In the instance declaration for ‛C3 Bool’ -Simple2.hs:39:1: - Warning: No explicit associated type or default declaration for `S3' - In the instance declaration for `C3 Float' +Simple2.hs:39:1: Warning: + No explicit associated type or default declaration for ‛S3’ + In the instance declaration for ‛C3 Float’ -Simple2.hs:39:1: - Warning: No explicit associated type or default declaration for `S3n' - In the instance declaration for `C3 Float' +Simple2.hs:39:1: Warning: + No explicit associated type or default declaration for ‛S3n’ + In the instance declaration for ‛C3 Float’ -Simple2.hs:39:10: - Warning: No explicit method or default declaration for `foo3n' - In the instance declaration for `C3 Float' +Simple2.hs:39:10: Warning: + No explicit method or default declaration for ‛foo3n’ + In the instance declaration for ‛C3 Float’ -Simple2.hs:39:10: - Warning: No explicit method or default declaration for `bar3n' - In the instance declaration for `C3 Float' +Simple2.hs:39:10: Warning: + No explicit method or default declaration for ‛bar3n’ + In the instance declaration for ‛C3 Float’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/DerivUnsatFam.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/DerivUnsatFam.stderr index 63c1262147..dbcb4f03c8 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/DerivUnsatFam.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/DerivUnsatFam.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -
-DerivUnsatFam.hs:8:1:
- Can't make a derived instance of `Functor T':
- Unsaturated data family application
- In the stand-alone deriving instance for `Functor T'
+ +DerivUnsatFam.hs:8:1: + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Functor T’: + Unsaturated data family application + In the stand-alone deriving instance for ‛Functor T’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/ExtraTcsUntch.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/ExtraTcsUntch.stderr index 428d4b968d..4b7532c962 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/ExtraTcsUntch.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/ExtraTcsUntch.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ ExtraTcsUntch.hs:24:53: - Could not deduce (C [t] [a]) arising from a use of `op' + Could not deduce (C [t] [a]) arising from a use of ‛op’ from the context (F Int ~ [[t]]) bound by the inferred type of f :: F Int ~ [[t]] => [t] -> ((), ((), ())) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/GADTwrong1.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/GADTwrong1.stderr index b61af24a62..aa6eedc88c 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/GADTwrong1.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/GADTwrong1.stderr @@ -1,21 +1,21 @@ -
-GADTwrong1.hs:12:19:
- Could not deduce (a1 ~ b)
- from the context (() ~ Const a1)
- bound by a pattern with constructor
- T :: forall a. a -> T (Const a),
- in a case alternative
- at GADTwrong1.hs:12:12-14
- `a1' is a rigid type variable bound by
- a pattern with constructor
- T :: forall a. a -> T (Const a),
- in a case alternative
- at GADTwrong1.hs:12:12
- `b' is a rigid type variable bound by
- the type signature for coerce :: a -> b at GADTwrong1.hs:10:20
- Relevant bindings include
- coerce :: a -> b (bound at GADTwrong1.hs:11:1)
- y :: a1 (bound at GADTwrong1.hs:12:14)
- In the expression: y
- In a case alternative: T y -> y
- In the expression: case T x :: T (Const b) of { T y -> y }
+ +GADTwrong1.hs:12:19: + Could not deduce (a1 ~ b) + from the context (() ~ Const a1) + bound by a pattern with constructor + T :: forall a. a -> T (Const a), + in a case alternative + at GADTwrong1.hs:12:12-14 + ‛a1’ is a rigid type variable bound by + a pattern with constructor + T :: forall a. a -> T (Const a), + in a case alternative + at GADTwrong1.hs:12:12 + ‛b’ is a rigid type variable bound by + the type signature for coerce :: a -> b at GADTwrong1.hs:10:20 + Relevant bindings include + coerce :: a -> b (bound at GADTwrong1.hs:11:1) + y :: a1 (bound at GADTwrong1.hs:12:14) + In the expression: y + In a case alternative: T y -> y + In the expression: case T x :: T (Const b) of { T y -> y } diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/NoMatchErr.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/NoMatchErr.stderr index 0176ffe2ec..7f43b5db4e 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/NoMatchErr.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/NoMatchErr.stderr @@ -1,13 +1,13 @@ -
-NoMatchErr.hs:19:7:
- Could not deduce (Memo d0 ~ Memo d)
- from the context (Fun d)
- bound by the type signature for f :: Fun d => Memo d a -> Memo d a
- at NoMatchErr.hs:19:7-37
- NB: `Memo' is a type function, and may not be injective
- The type variable `d0' is ambiguous
- Expected type: Memo d a -> Memo d a
- Actual type: Memo d0 a -> Memo d0 a
- In the ambiguity check for:
- forall d a. Fun d => Memo d a -> Memo d a
- In the type signature for `f': f :: Fun d => Memo d a -> Memo d a
+ +NoMatchErr.hs:19:7: + Could not deduce (Memo d0 ~ Memo d) + from the context (Fun d) + bound by the type signature for f :: Fun d => Memo d a -> Memo d a + at NoMatchErr.hs:19:7-37 + NB: ‛Memo’ is a type function, and may not be injective + The type variable ‛d0’ is ambiguous + Expected type: Memo d a -> Memo d a + Actual type: Memo d0 a -> Memo d0 a + In the ambiguity check for: + forall d a. Fun d => Memo d a -> Memo d a + In the type signature for ‛f’: f :: Fun d => Memo d a -> Memo d a diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/NotRelaxedExamples.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/NotRelaxedExamples.stderr index d08570a06b..e56025a908 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/NotRelaxedExamples.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/NotRelaxedExamples.stderr @@ -1,18 +1,18 @@ -
-NotRelaxedExamples.hs:9:15:
- Nested type family application
- in the type family application: F1 (F1 Char)
- (Use -XUndecidableInstances to permit this)
- In the type instance declaration for `F1'
-
-NotRelaxedExamples.hs:10:15:
- Application is no smaller than the instance head
- in the type family application: F2 [x]
- (Use -XUndecidableInstances to permit this)
- In the type instance declaration for `F2'
-
-NotRelaxedExamples.hs:11:15:
- Application is no smaller than the instance head
- in the type family application: F3 [Char]
- (Use -XUndecidableInstances to permit this)
- In the type instance declaration for `F3'
+ +NotRelaxedExamples.hs:9:15: + Nested type family application + in the type family application: F1 (F1 Char) + (Use -XUndecidableInstances to permit this) + In the type instance declaration for ‛F1’ + +NotRelaxedExamples.hs:10:15: + Application is no smaller than the instance head + in the type family application: F2 [x] + (Use -XUndecidableInstances to permit this) + In the type instance declaration for ‛F2’ + +NotRelaxedExamples.hs:11:15: + Application is no smaller than the instance head + in the type family application: F3 [Char] + (Use -XUndecidableInstances to permit this) + In the type instance declaration for ‛F3’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/Overlap10.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/Overlap10.stderr index 63fa4d9c38..342cbe4bca 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/Overlap10.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/Overlap10.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ -
-Overlap10.hs:11:7:
- Couldn't match expected type `F a Bool' with actual type `Bool'
- Relevant bindings include
- g :: a -> F a Bool (bound at Overlap10.hs:11:1)
- x :: a (bound at Overlap10.hs:11:3)
- In the expression: False
- In an equation for `g': g x = False
+ +Overlap10.hs:11:7: + Couldn't match expected type ‛F a Bool’ with actual type ‛Bool’ + Relevant bindings include + g :: a -> F a Bool (bound at Overlap10.hs:11:1) + x :: a (bound at Overlap10.hs:11:3) + In the expression: False + In an equation for ‛g’: g x = False diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/Overlap11.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/Overlap11.stderr index 929ce34603..476ae6c2fb 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/Overlap11.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/Overlap11.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ -
-Overlap11.hs:11:8:
- Couldn't match expected type `F a Int' with actual type `Int'
- Relevant bindings include
- g :: a -> F a Int (bound at Overlap11.hs:11:1)
- x :: a (bound at Overlap11.hs:11:3)
- In the expression: (5 :: Int)
- In an equation for `g': g x = (5 :: Int)
+ +Overlap11.hs:11:8: + Couldn't match expected type ‛F a Int’ with actual type ‛Int’ + Relevant bindings include + g :: a -> F a Int (bound at Overlap11.hs:11:1) + x :: a (bound at Overlap11.hs:11:3) + In the expression: (5 :: Int) + In an equation for ‛g’: g x = (5 :: Int) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/Overlap5.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/Overlap5.stderr index 329d410fdb..0413002ab5 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/Overlap5.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/Overlap5.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ Overlap5.hs:16:7: - Couldn't match type `x' with `And x 'True' - `x' is a rigid type variable bound by + Couldn't match type ‛x’ with ‛And x 'True’ + ‛x’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for g :: Proxy Bool x -> Proxy Bool (And x 'True) at Overlap5.hs:15:6 @@ -12,11 +12,11 @@ Overlap5.hs:16:7: (bound at Overlap5.hs:16:1) x :: Proxy Bool x (bound at Overlap5.hs:16:3) In the expression: x - In an equation for `g': g x = x + In an equation for ‛g’: g x = x Overlap5.hs:19:7: - Couldn't match type `x' with `And x x' - `x' is a rigid type variable bound by + Couldn't match type ‛x’ with ‛And x x’ + ‛x’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for h :: Proxy Bool x -> Proxy Bool (And x x) at Overlap5.hs:18:6 Expected type: Proxy Bool (And x x) @@ -26,4 +26,4 @@ Overlap5.hs:19:7: (bound at Overlap5.hs:19:1) x :: Proxy Bool x (bound at Overlap5.hs:19:3) In the expression: x - In an equation for `h': h x = x + In an equation for ‛h’: h x = x diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/Overlap6.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/Overlap6.stderr index 8149e2d923..c59a1ab72d 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/Overlap6.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/Overlap6.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ Overlap6.hs:16:7: - Couldn't match type `x' with `And x 'True' - `x' is a rigid type variable bound by + Couldn't match type ‛x’ with ‛And x 'True’ + ‛x’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for g :: Proxy Bool x -> Proxy Bool (And x 'True) at Overlap6.hs:15:6 @@ -12,4 +12,4 @@ Overlap6.hs:16:7: (bound at Overlap6.hs:16:1) x :: Proxy Bool x (bound at Overlap6.hs:16:3) In the expression: x - In an equation for `g': g x = x + In an equation for ‛g’: g x = x diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/Overlap9.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/Overlap9.stderr index d70a76c8ef..97c59c2a87 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/Overlap9.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/Overlap9.stderr @@ -7,6 +7,6 @@ Overlap9.hs:11:7: Relevant bindings include g :: a -> F a (bound at Overlap9.hs:11:1) x :: a (bound at Overlap9.hs:11:3) - In the return type of a call of `length' + In the return type of a call of ‛length’ In the expression: length (show x) - In an equation for `g': g x = length (show x) + In an equation for ‛g’: g x = length (show x) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail12.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail12.stderr index 93eabd618a..e93b4f4d1e 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail12.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail12.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -
-SimpleFail12.hs:8:15:
- Illegal polymorphic or qualified type: forall a. [a]
- In the type instance declaration for `C'
+ +SimpleFail12.hs:8:15: + Illegal polymorphic or qualified type: forall a. [a] + In the type instance declaration for ‛C’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail13.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail13.stderr index a927fec6f5..a31dda6b8b 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail13.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail13.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ -
-SimpleFail13.hs:9:1:
- Illegal type synonym family application in instance: [C a]
- In the data instance declaration for `D'
-
-SimpleFail13.hs:13:15:
- Illegal type synonym family application in instance: [C a]
- In the type instance declaration for `E'
+ +SimpleFail13.hs:9:1: + Illegal type synonym family application in instance: [C a] + In the data instance declaration for ‛D’ + +SimpleFail13.hs:13:15: + Illegal type synonym family application in instance: [C a] + In the type instance declaration for ‛E’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail14.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail14.stderr index 14f078d59a..b6015046f7 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail14.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail14.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ -
-SimpleFail14.hs:5:15:
- Expected a type, but `a ~ a' has kind `Constraint'
- In the type `a ~ a'
- In the definition of data constructor `T'
- In the data declaration for `T'
+ +SimpleFail14.hs:5:15: + Expected a type, but ‛a ~ a’ has kind ‛Constraint’ + In the type ‛a ~ a’ + In the definition of data constructor ‛T’ + In the data declaration for ‛T’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail15.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail15.stderr index e2b7bba314..d5c1c7fb54 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail15.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail15.stderr @@ -2,5 +2,5 @@ SimpleFail15.hs:5:8: Illegal polymorphic or qualified type: a ~ b => t Perhaps you intended to use -XRankNTypes or -XRank2Types - In the type signature for `foo': + In the type signature for ‛foo’: foo :: (a, b) -> (a ~ b => t) -> (a, b) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail16.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail16.stderr index 3ad3cc7707..1e50ae1c3c 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail16.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail16.stderr @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ -
-SimpleFail16.hs:10:12:
- Couldn't match expected type `p0 a0' with actual type `F ()'
- The type variables `p0', `a0' are ambiguous
- Relevant bindings include
- bar :: p0 a0 (bound at SimpleFail16.hs:10:1)
- In the first argument of `foo', namely `(undefined :: F ())'
- In the expression: foo (undefined :: F ())
- In an equation for `bar': bar = foo (undefined :: F ())
+ +SimpleFail16.hs:10:12: + Couldn't match expected type ‛p0 a0’ with actual type ‛F ()’ + The type variables ‛p0’, ‛a0’ are ambiguous + Relevant bindings include + bar :: p0 a0 (bound at SimpleFail16.hs:10:1) + In the first argument of ‛foo’, namely ‛(undefined :: F ())’ + In the expression: foo (undefined :: F ()) + In an equation for ‛bar’: bar = foo (undefined :: F ()) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail1a.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail1a.stderr index ba950b41f1..7108a5ba73 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail1a.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail1a.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -
-SimpleFail1a.hs:4:1:
- Number of parameters must match family declaration; expected 2
- In the data instance declaration for `T1'
+ +SimpleFail1a.hs:4:1: + Number of parameters must match family declaration; expected 2 + In the data instance declaration for ‛T1’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail1b.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail1b.stderr index 8becc3e8fc..a65a50d2c2 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail1b.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail1b.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -
-SimpleFail1b.hs:4:1:
- Number of parameters must match family declaration; expected 2
- In the data instance declaration for `T1'
+ +SimpleFail1b.hs:4:1: + Number of parameters must match family declaration; expected 2 + In the data instance declaration for ‛T1’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail2a.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail2a.stderr index c8ac4513dd..5d058756a3 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail2a.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail2a.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ SimpleFail2a.hs:11:3: Type indexes must match class instance head - Found `a' but expected `Int' - In the data instance declaration for `Sd' - In the instance declaration for `C Int' + Found ‛a’ but expected ‛Int’ + In the data instance declaration for ‛Sd’ + In the instance declaration for ‛C Int’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail3a.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail3a.stderr index 164351a01f..cdf4251318 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail3a.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail3a.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -
-SimpleFail3a.hs:10:3:
- Wrong category of family instance; declaration was for a data type
- In the type instance declaration for `S1'
- In the instance declaration for `C1 Int'
+ +SimpleFail3a.hs:10:3: + Wrong category of family instance; declaration was for a data type + In the type instance declaration for ‛S1’ + In the instance declaration for ‛C1 Int’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail4.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail4.stderr index 1eca808bd9..b9d99df243 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail4.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail4.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ SimpleFail4.hs:8:8: Type indexes must match class instance head - Found `Int' but expected `a' - In the type synonym instance default declaration for `S2' - In the class declaration for `C2' + Found ‛Int’ but expected ‛a’ + In the type synonym instance default declaration for ‛S2’ + In the class declaration for ‛C2’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail5a.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail5a.stderr index 124eb7948e..8cadf52b49 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail5a.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail5a.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ SimpleFail5a.hs:31:11: - Couldn't match type `a' with `Int' - `a' is a rigid type variable bound by + Couldn't match type ‛a’ with ‛Int’ + ‛a’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for bar3wrong :: S3 a -> a at SimpleFail5a.hs:30:14 Expected type: S3 a @@ -9,4 +9,4 @@ SimpleFail5a.hs:31:11: Relevant bindings include bar3wrong :: S3 a -> a (bound at SimpleFail5a.hs:31:1) In the pattern: D3Int - In an equation for `bar3wrong': bar3wrong D3Int = 1 + In an equation for ‛bar3wrong’: bar3wrong D3Int = 1 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail5b.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail5b.stderr index bd28918f15..2861582d97 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail5b.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail5b.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ SimpleFail5b.hs:31:12: - Couldn't match type `Char' with `Int' + Couldn't match type ‛Char’ with ‛Int’ Expected type: S3 Int Actual type: S3 Char In the pattern: D3Char - In an equation for bar3wrong': bar3wrong' D3Char = 'a' + In an equation for ‛bar3wrong'’: bar3wrong' D3Char = 'a' diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail6.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail6.stderr index 679aaf8722..71e9e56668 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail6.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail6.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ SimpleFail6.hs:7:11: - Conflicting definitions for `a' + Conflicting definitions for ‛a’ Bound at: SimpleFail6.hs:7:11 SimpleFail6.hs:7:13 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail7.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail7.stderr index 59d2413441..4778f0dcc3 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail7.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail7.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -
-SimpleFail7.hs:8:1:
- Associated type `S5' must be inside a class instance
- In the data instance declaration for `S5'
+ +SimpleFail7.hs:8:1: + Associated type ‛S5’ must be inside a class instance + In the data instance declaration for ‛S5’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail8.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail8.stderr index 421bd53b25..ae25f9da56 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail8.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/SimpleFail8.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ -
-SimpleFail8.hs:9:8:
- `Map' is not a (visible) associated type of class `C6'
-
-SimpleFail8.hs:10:8:
- `S3' is not a (visible) associated type of class `C6'
+ +SimpleFail8.hs:9:8: + ‛Map’ is not a (visible) associated type of class ‛C6’ + +SimpleFail8.hs:10:8: + ‛S3’ is not a (visible) associated type of class ‛C6’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T1897b.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T1897b.stderr index 32bb3cff9f..5bb6ef1650 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T1897b.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T1897b.stderr @@ -1,14 +1,14 @@ -
-T1897b.hs:16:1:
- Could not deduce (Depend a0 ~ Depend a)
- from the context (Bug a)
- bound by the inferred type for `isValid':
- Bug a => [Depend a] -> Bool
- at T1897b.hs:16:1-41
- NB: `Depend' is a type function, and may not be injective
- The type variable `a0' is ambiguous
- Expected type: [Depend a] -> Bool
- Actual type: [Depend a0] -> Bool
- When checking that `isValid'
- has the inferred type `forall a. Bug a => [Depend a] -> Bool'
- Probable cause: the inferred type is ambiguous
+ +T1897b.hs:16:1: + Could not deduce (Depend a0 ~ Depend a) + from the context (Bug a) + bound by the inferred type for ‛isValid’: + Bug a => [Depend a] -> Bool + at T1897b.hs:16:1-41 + NB: ‛Depend’ is a type function, and may not be injective + The type variable ‛a0’ is ambiguous + Expected type: [Depend a] -> Bool + Actual type: [Depend a0] -> Bool + When checking that ‛isValid’ + has the inferred type ‛forall a. Bug a => [Depend a] -> Bool’ + Probable cause: the inferred type is ambiguous diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T1900.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T1900.stderr index 6d7eb62e30..08218a2caf 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T1900.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T1900.stderr @@ -1,13 +1,13 @@ -
-T1900.hs:13:10:
- Could not deduce (Depend s0 ~ Depend s)
- from the context (Bug s)
- bound by the type signature for check :: Bug s => Depend s -> Bool
- at T1900.hs:13:10-36
- NB: `Depend' is a type function, and may not be injective
- The type variable `s0' is ambiguous
- Expected type: Depend s -> Bool
- Actual type: Depend s0 -> Bool
- In the ambiguity check for: forall s. Bug s => Depend s -> Bool
- In the type signature for `check':
- check :: Bug s => Depend s -> Bool
+ +T1900.hs:13:10: + Could not deduce (Depend s0 ~ Depend s) + from the context (Bug s) + bound by the type signature for check :: Bug s => Depend s -> Bool + at T1900.hs:13:10-36 + NB: ‛Depend’ is a type function, and may not be injective + The type variable ‛s0’ is ambiguous + Expected type: Depend s -> Bool + Actual type: Depend s0 -> Bool + In the ambiguity check for: forall s. Bug s => Depend s -> Bool + In the type signature for ‛check’: + check :: Bug s => Depend s -> Bool diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T2157.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T2157.stderr index 44f0a2436f..0f6f272de9 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T2157.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T2157.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -
-T2157.hs:7:15:
- Type synonym `S' should have 2 arguments, but has been given 1
- In the type instance declaration for `F'
+ +T2157.hs:7:15: + Type synonym ‛S’ should have 2 arguments, but has been given 1 + In the type instance declaration for ‛F’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T2203a.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T2203a.stderr index cd12f6a7be..67390f298f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T2203a.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T2203a.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ T2203a.hs:13:19: Illegal type synonym family application in instance: - Either a (TheFoo a) - In the instance declaration for `Bar (Either a (TheFoo a))' + Either a (TheFoo a) + In the instance declaration for ‛Bar (Either a (TheFoo a))’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T2239.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T2239.stderr index 5c0403c6f0..b322d9f06d 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T2239.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T2239.stderr @@ -1,28 +1,28 @@ -
-T2239.hs:47:13:
- Couldn't match type `b -> b'
- with `forall b1. MyEq b1 Bool => b1 -> b1'
- Expected type: (forall b1. MyEq b1 Bool => b1 -> b1) -> b -> b
- Actual type: (b -> b) -> b -> b
- In the expression:
- id ::
- (forall b. MyEq b Bool => b -> b)
- -> (forall b. MyEq b Bool => b -> b)
- In an equation for `complexFD':
- complexFD
- = id ::
- (forall b. MyEq b Bool => b -> b)
- -> (forall b. MyEq b Bool => b -> b)
-
-T2239.hs:50:13:
- Couldn't match type `Bool -> Bool'
- with `forall b1. b1 ~ Bool => b1 -> b1'
- Expected type: (forall b1. b1 ~ Bool => b1 -> b1) -> b -> b
- Actual type: (b -> b) -> b -> b
- In the expression:
- id ::
- (forall b. b ~ Bool => b -> b) -> (forall b. b ~ Bool => b -> b)
- In an equation for `complexTF':
- complexTF
- = id ::
- (forall b. b ~ Bool => b -> b) -> (forall b. b ~ Bool => b -> b)
+ +T2239.hs:47:13: + Couldn't match type ‛b -> b’ + with ‛forall b1. MyEq b1 Bool => b1 -> b1’ + Expected type: (forall b1. MyEq b1 Bool => b1 -> b1) -> b -> b + Actual type: (b -> b) -> b -> b + In the expression: + id :: + (forall b. MyEq b Bool => b -> b) + -> (forall b. MyEq b Bool => b -> b) + In an equation for ‛complexFD’: + complexFD + = id :: + (forall b. MyEq b Bool => b -> b) + -> (forall b. MyEq b Bool => b -> b) + +T2239.hs:50:13: + Couldn't match type ‛Bool -> Bool’ + with ‛forall b1. b1 ~ Bool => b1 -> b1’ + Expected type: (forall b1. b1 ~ Bool => b1 -> b1) -> b -> b + Actual type: (b -> b) -> b -> b + In the expression: + id :: + (forall b. b ~ Bool => b -> b) -> (forall b. b ~ Bool => b -> b) + In an equation for ‛complexTF’: + complexTF + = id :: + (forall b. b ~ Bool => b -> b) -> (forall b. b ~ Bool => b -> b) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T2334A.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T2334A.stderr index 16ad7b047e..ff4e35206f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T2334A.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T2334A.stderr @@ -1,15 +1,15 @@ T2334A.hs:9:26: The constructor of a newtype must have exactly one field - but `F' has two - In the definition of data constructor `F' - In the newtype instance declaration for `F' + but ‛F’ has two + In the definition of data constructor ‛F’ + In the newtype instance declaration for ‛F’ T2334A.hs:10:27: The constructor of a newtype must have exactly one field - but `H' has none - In the definition of data constructor `H' - In the newtype instance declaration for `F' + but ‛H’ has none + In the definition of data constructor ‛H’ + In the newtype instance declaration for ‛F’ T2334A.hs:12:15: Conflicting family instance declarations: diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T2544.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T2544.stderr index fae7cbf284..33e36a0aa5 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T2544.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T2544.stderr @@ -1,28 +1,28 @@ -
-T2544.hs:15:18:
- Could not deduce (IxMap i0 ~ IxMap l)
- from the context (Ix l, Ix r)
- bound by the instance declaration at T2544.hs:13:10-37
- NB: `IxMap' is a type function, and may not be injective
- The type variable `i0' is ambiguous
- Expected type: IxMap l [Int]
- Actual type: IxMap i0 [Int]
- Relevant bindings include
- empty :: IxMap (l :|: r) [Int] (bound at T2544.hs:15:4)
- In the first argument of `BiApp', namely `empty'
- In the expression: BiApp empty empty
- In an equation for `empty': empty = BiApp empty empty
-
-T2544.hs:15:24:
- Could not deduce (IxMap i1 ~ IxMap r)
- from the context (Ix l, Ix r)
- bound by the instance declaration at T2544.hs:13:10-37
- NB: `IxMap' is a type function, and may not be injective
- The type variable `i1' is ambiguous
- Expected type: IxMap r [Int]
- Actual type: IxMap i1 [Int]
- Relevant bindings include
- empty :: IxMap (l :|: r) [Int] (bound at T2544.hs:15:4)
- In the second argument of `BiApp', namely `empty'
- In the expression: BiApp empty empty
- In an equation for `empty': empty = BiApp empty empty
+ +T2544.hs:15:18: + Could not deduce (IxMap i0 ~ IxMap l) + from the context (Ix l, Ix r) + bound by the instance declaration at T2544.hs:13:10-37 + NB: ‛IxMap’ is a type function, and may not be injective + The type variable ‛i0’ is ambiguous + Expected type: IxMap l [Int] + Actual type: IxMap i0 [Int] + Relevant bindings include + empty :: IxMap (l :|: r) [Int] (bound at T2544.hs:15:4) + In the first argument of ‛BiApp’, namely ‛empty’ + In the expression: BiApp empty empty + In an equation for ‛empty’: empty = BiApp empty empty + +T2544.hs:15:24: + Could not deduce (IxMap i1 ~ IxMap r) + from the context (Ix l, Ix r) + bound by the instance declaration at T2544.hs:13:10-37 + NB: ‛IxMap’ is a type function, and may not be injective + The type variable ‛i1’ is ambiguous + Expected type: IxMap r [Int] + Actual type: IxMap i1 [Int] + Relevant bindings include + empty :: IxMap (l :|: r) [Int] (bound at T2544.hs:15:4) + In the second argument of ‛BiApp’, namely ‛empty’ + In the expression: BiApp empty empty + In an equation for ‛empty’: empty = BiApp empty empty diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T2627b.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T2627b.stderr index 871d455ea8..61399d02dd 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T2627b.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T2627b.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ -
-T2627b.hs:20:24:
- Occurs check: cannot construct the infinite type:
- a0 ~ Dual (Dual a0)
- The type variable `a0' is ambiguous
- In the expression: conn undefined undefined
- In an equation for `conn':
- conn (Rd k) (Wr a r) = conn undefined undefined
+ +T2627b.hs:20:24: + Occurs check: cannot construct the infinite type: + a0 ~ Dual (Dual a0) + The type variable ‛a0’ is ambiguous + In the expression: conn undefined undefined + In an equation for ‛conn’: + conn (Rd k) (Wr a r) = conn undefined undefined diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T2664.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T2664.stderr index f3996d9146..4982410ca9 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T2664.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T2664.stderr @@ -1,23 +1,23 @@ -
-T2664.hs:31:52:
- Could not deduce (b ~ a)
- from the context (Connect a, Connect b)
- bound by the instance declaration at T2664.hs:22:10-52
- or from ((a :*: b) ~ Dual c, c ~ Dual (a :*: b))
- bound by the type signature for
- newPChan :: ((a :*: b) ~ Dual c, c ~ Dual (a :*: b)) =>
- IO (PChan (a :*: b), PChan c)
- at T2664.hs:23:5-12
- `b' is a rigid type variable bound by
- the instance declaration at T2664.hs:22:10
- `a' is a rigid type variable bound by
- the instance declaration at T2664.hs:22:10
- Expected type: Dual (Dual a)
- Actual type: b
- Relevant bindings include
- newPChan :: IO (PChan (a :*: b), PChan c) (bound at T2664.hs:23:5)
- v :: MVar (Either (PChan a) (PChan b)) (bound at T2664.hs:24:9)
- In the third argument of `pchoose', namely `newPChan'
- In the first argument of `E', namely `(pchoose Right v newPChan)'
- In the expression:
- E (pchoose Right v newPChan) (pchoose Left v newPChan)
+ +T2664.hs:31:52: + Could not deduce (b ~ a) + from the context (Connect a, Connect b) + bound by the instance declaration at T2664.hs:22:10-52 + or from ((a :*: b) ~ Dual c, c ~ Dual (a :*: b)) + bound by the type signature for + newPChan :: ((a :*: b) ~ Dual c, c ~ Dual (a :*: b)) => + IO (PChan (a :*: b), PChan c) + at T2664.hs:23:5-12 + ‛b’ is a rigid type variable bound by + the instance declaration at T2664.hs:22:10 + ‛a’ is a rigid type variable bound by + the instance declaration at T2664.hs:22:10 + Expected type: Dual (Dual a) + Actual type: b + Relevant bindings include + newPChan :: IO (PChan (a :*: b), PChan c) (bound at T2664.hs:23:5) + v :: MVar (Either (PChan a) (PChan b)) (bound at T2664.hs:24:9) + In the third argument of ‛pchoose’, namely ‛newPChan’ + In the first argument of ‛E’, namely ‛(pchoose Right v newPChan)’ + In the expression: + E (pchoose Right v newPChan) (pchoose Left v newPChan) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T2693.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T2693.stderr index 4427018fd0..8c02ea263d 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T2693.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T2693.stderr @@ -1,43 +1,43 @@ -
-T2693.hs:11:7:
- Couldn't match expected type `TFn a' with actual type `TFn a0'
- NB: `TFn' is a type function, and may not be injective
- The type variable `a0' is ambiguous
- When checking that `x' has the inferred type `forall a. TFn a'
- Probable cause: the inferred type is ambiguous
- In the expression:
- do { let Just x = ...;
- let n = fst x + fst x;
- return () }
- In an equation for `f':
- f = do { let Just x = ...;
- let n = ...;
- return () }
-
-T2693.hs:19:15:
- Couldn't match expected type `(a2, b0)' with actual type `TFn a3'
- The type variables `a2', `b0', `a3' are ambiguous
- Relevant bindings include n :: a2 (bound at T2693.hs:19:7)
- In the first argument of `fst', namely `x'
- In the first argument of `(+)', namely `fst x'
- In the expression: fst x + snd x
-
-T2693.hs:19:23:
- Couldn't match expected type `(a4, a2)' with actual type `TFn a5'
- The type variables `a2', `a4', `a5' are ambiguous
- Relevant bindings include n :: a2 (bound at T2693.hs:19:7)
- In the first argument of `snd', namely `x'
- In the second argument of `(+)', namely `snd x'
- In the expression: fst x + snd x
-
-T2693.hs:29:20:
- Couldn't match type `TFn a0' with `PVR a1'
- The type variables `a0', `a1' are ambiguous
- Expected type: () -> Maybe (PVR a1)
- Actual type: () -> Maybe (TFn a0)
- In the first argument of `mapM', namely `g'
- In a stmt of a 'do' block: pvs <- mapM g undefined
- In the expression:
- do { pvs <- mapM g undefined;
- let n = (map pvrX pvs) `min` (map pvrX pvs);
- undefined }
+ +T2693.hs:11:7: + Couldn't match expected type ‛TFn a’ with actual type ‛TFn a0’ + NB: ‛TFn’ is a type function, and may not be injective + The type variable ‛a0’ is ambiguous + When checking that ‛x’ has the inferred type ‛forall a. TFn a’ + Probable cause: the inferred type is ambiguous + In the expression: + do { let Just x = ...; + let n = fst x + fst x; + return () } + In an equation for ‛f’: + f = do { let Just x = ...; + let n = ...; + return () } + +T2693.hs:19:15: + Couldn't match expected type ‛(a2, b0)’ with actual type ‛TFn a3’ + The type variables ‛a2’, ‛b0’, ‛a3’ are ambiguous + Relevant bindings include n :: a2 (bound at T2693.hs:19:7) + In the first argument of ‛fst’, namely ‛x’ + In the first argument of ‛(+)’, namely ‛fst x’ + In the expression: fst x + snd x + +T2693.hs:19:23: + Couldn't match expected type ‛(a4, a2)’ with actual type ‛TFn a5’ + The type variables ‛a2’, ‛a4’, ‛a5’ are ambiguous + Relevant bindings include n :: a2 (bound at T2693.hs:19:7) + In the first argument of ‛snd’, namely ‛x’ + In the second argument of ‛(+)’, namely ‛snd x’ + In the expression: fst x + snd x + +T2693.hs:29:20: + Couldn't match type ‛TFn a0’ with ‛PVR a1’ + The type variables ‛a0’, ‛a1’ are ambiguous + Expected type: () -> Maybe (PVR a1) + Actual type: () -> Maybe (TFn a0) + In the first argument of ‛mapM’, namely ‛g’ + In a stmt of a 'do' block: pvs <- mapM g undefined + In the expression: + do { pvs <- mapM g undefined; + let n = (map pvrX pvs) `min` (map pvrX pvs); + undefined } diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T3092.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T3092.stderr index f45e35580a..436db19f81 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T3092.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T3092.stderr @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ -
-T3092.hs:5:1:
- Illegal family instance for `T'
- (T is not an indexed type family)
- In the data instance declaration for `T'
-
-T3092.hs:8:1:
- Illegal family instance for `S'
- (S is not an indexed type family)
- In the type instance declaration for `S'
+ +T3092.hs:5:1: + Illegal family instance for ‛T’ + (T is not an indexed type family) + In the data instance declaration for ‛T’ + +T3092.hs:8:1: + Illegal family instance for ‛S’ + (S is not an indexed type family) + In the type instance declaration for ‛S’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T3330a.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T3330a.stderr index e44ab4d6f7..9c4fedfa45 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T3330a.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T3330a.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ T3330a.hs:19:34: - Couldn't match type `ix' - with `r ix1 -> Writer [AnyF ((->) (s0 ix0 -> ix1))] (r'0 ix1)' - `ix' is a rigid type variable bound by + Couldn't match type ‛ix’ + with ‛r ix1 -> Writer [AnyF ((->) (s0 ix0 -> ix1))] (r'0 ix1)’ + ‛ix’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for children :: s ix -> PF s r ix -> [AnyF s] at T3330a.hs:18:13 Expected type: (s0 ix0 -> ix1) @@ -12,13 +12,13 @@ T3330a.hs:19:34: children :: s ix -> PF s r ix -> [AnyF s] (bound at T3330a.hs:19:1) p :: s ix (bound at T3330a.hs:19:10) x :: PF s r ix (bound at T3330a.hs:19:12) - In the first argument of `hmapM', namely `p' - In the first argument of `execWriter', namely `(hmapM p collect x)' + In the first argument of ‛hmapM’, namely ‛p’ + In the first argument of ‛execWriter’, namely ‛(hmapM p collect x)’ In the expression: execWriter (hmapM p collect x) T3330a.hs:19:34: - Couldn't match type `s' with `(->) (s0 ix0 -> ix1)' - `s' is a rigid type variable bound by + Couldn't match type ‛s’ with ‛(->) (s0 ix0 -> ix1)’ + ‛s’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for children :: s ix -> PF s r ix -> [AnyF s] at T3330a.hs:18:13 Expected type: (s0 ix0 -> ix1) @@ -28,13 +28,13 @@ T3330a.hs:19:34: children :: s ix -> PF s r ix -> [AnyF s] (bound at T3330a.hs:19:1) p :: s ix (bound at T3330a.hs:19:10) x :: PF s r ix (bound at T3330a.hs:19:12) - In the first argument of `hmapM', namely `p' - In the first argument of `execWriter', namely `(hmapM p collect x)' + In the first argument of ‛hmapM’, namely ‛p’ + In the first argument of ‛execWriter’, namely ‛(hmapM p collect x)’ In the expression: execWriter (hmapM p collect x) T3330a.hs:19:44: - Couldn't match type `ix' with `r0 ix0 -> Writer [AnyF s0] (r0 ix0)' - `ix' is a rigid type variable bound by + Couldn't match type ‛ix’ with ‛r0 ix0 -> Writer [AnyF s0] (r0 ix0)’ + ‛ix’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for children :: s ix -> PF s r ix -> [AnyF s] at T3330a.hs:18:13 Expected type: PF s r (r0 ix0 -> Writer [AnyF s0] (r0 ix0)) @@ -43,6 +43,6 @@ T3330a.hs:19:44: children :: s ix -> PF s r ix -> [AnyF s] (bound at T3330a.hs:19:1) p :: s ix (bound at T3330a.hs:19:10) x :: PF s r ix (bound at T3330a.hs:19:12) - In the third argument of `hmapM', namely `x' - In the first argument of `execWriter', namely `(hmapM p collect x)' + In the third argument of ‛hmapM’, namely ‛x’ + In the first argument of ‛execWriter’, namely ‛(hmapM p collect x)’ In the expression: execWriter (hmapM p collect x) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T3330c.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T3330c.stderr index 8c657c8116..52d6afe3e7 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T3330c.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T3330c.stderr @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ T3330c.hs:23:43: - Couldn't match kind `*' with `* -> *' + Couldn't match kind ‛*’ with ‛* -> *’ When matching types Der ((->) x) :: * -> * R :: (* -> *) -> * Expected type: Der ((->) x) (f1 x) Actual type: R f1 - In the first argument of `plug', namely `rf' - In the first argument of `Inl', namely `(plug rf df x)' + In the first argument of ‛plug’, namely ‛rf’ + In the first argument of ‛Inl’, namely ‛(plug rf df x)’ In the expression: Inl (plug rf df x) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T3440.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T3440.stderr index b9f49fa0b9..af8b90fd74 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T3440.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T3440.stderr @@ -4,14 +4,14 @@ T3440.hs:11:22: from the context (Fam a ~ Fam a1) bound by a pattern with constructor GADT :: forall a. a -> Fam a -> GADT (Fam a), - in an equation for `unwrap' + in an equation for ‛unwrap’ at T3440.hs:11:9-16 - `a1' is a rigid type variable bound by + ‛a1’ is a rigid type variable bound by a pattern with constructor GADT :: forall a. a -> Fam a -> GADT (Fam a), - in an equation for `unwrap' + in an equation for ‛unwrap’ at T3440.hs:11:9 - `a' is a rigid type variable bound by + ‛a’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for unwrap :: GADT (Fam a) -> (a, Fam a) at T3440.hs:10:11 Relevant bindings include @@ -20,4 +20,4 @@ T3440.hs:11:22: y :: Fam a1 (bound at T3440.hs:11:16) In the expression: x In the expression: (x, y) - In an equation for `unwrap': unwrap (GADT x y) = (x, y) + In an equation for ‛unwrap’: unwrap (GADT x y) = (x, y) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T4093a.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T4093a.stderr index 5a5ce0826d..83578248ae 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T4093a.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T4093a.stderr @@ -4,12 +4,12 @@ T4093a.hs:8:8: from the context (Foo e ~ Maybe e) bound by the type signature for hang :: Foo e ~ Maybe e => Foo e at T4093a.hs:7:9-34 - `e' is a rigid type variable bound by + ‛e’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for hang :: Foo e ~ Maybe e => Foo e at T4093a.hs:7:9 Expected type: Foo e Actual type: Maybe () Relevant bindings include hang :: Foo e (bound at T4093a.hs:8:1) - In the return type of a call of `Just' + In the return type of a call of ‛Just’ In the expression: Just () - In an equation for `hang': hang = Just () + In an equation for ‛hang’: hang = Just () diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T4093b.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T4093b.stderr index 67f9b7d924..b80cf634a8 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T4093b.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T4093b.stderr @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ T4093b.hs:31:13: EitherCO x (A C C n) (A C O n) ~ A C x n) => Block n e x -> A e x n at T4093b.hs:(20,3)-(22,26) - `e' is a rigid type variable bound by + ‛e’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for blockToNodeList :: (EitherCO e (A C O n) (A O O n) ~ A e O n, EitherCO x (A C C n) (A C O n) ~ A C x n) => @@ -26,8 +26,8 @@ T4093b.hs:31:13: -> EitherCO e (A C O n) (A O O n) -> EitherCO e (A C O n) (A O O n) (bound at T4093b.hs:31:5) In the expression: (JustC n, NothingC) - In an equation for `f': f n _ = (JustC n, NothingC) - In an equation for `blockToNodeList': + In an equation for ‛f’: f n _ = (JustC n, NothingC) + In an equation for ‛blockToNodeList’: blockToNodeList b = foldBlockNodesF (f, l) b z where diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T4099.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T4099.stderr index 60e379525a..312b0b6443 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T4099.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T4099.stderr @@ -1,23 +1,23 @@ -
-T4099.hs:11:30:
- Couldn't match expected type `T a0' with actual type `T b'
- NB: `T' is a type function, and may not be injective
- The type variable `a0' is ambiguous
- Relevant bindings include
- bar1 :: b -> T b -> Int (bound at T4099.hs:11:1)
- a :: b (bound at T4099.hs:11:6)
- x :: T b (bound at T4099.hs:11:8)
- In the second argument of `foo', namely `x'
- In the expression: foo (error "urk") x
- In an equation for `bar1': bar1 a x = foo (error "urk") x
-
-T4099.hs:14:30:
- Couldn't match expected type `T a1' with actual type `Maybe b'
- The type variable `a1' is ambiguous
- Relevant bindings include
- bar2 :: b -> Maybe b -> Int (bound at T4099.hs:14:1)
- a :: b (bound at T4099.hs:14:6)
- x :: Maybe b (bound at T4099.hs:14:8)
- In the second argument of `foo', namely `x'
- In the expression: foo (error "urk") x
- In an equation for `bar2': bar2 a x = foo (error "urk") x
+ +T4099.hs:11:30: + Couldn't match expected type ‛T a0’ with actual type ‛T b’ + NB: ‛T’ is a type function, and may not be injective + The type variable ‛a0’ is ambiguous + Relevant bindings include + bar1 :: b -> T b -> Int (bound at T4099.hs:11:1) + a :: b (bound at T4099.hs:11:6) + x :: T b (bound at T4099.hs:11:8) + In the second argument of ‛foo’, namely ‛x’ + In the expression: foo (error "urk") x + In an equation for ‛bar1’: bar1 a x = foo (error "urk") x + +T4099.hs:14:30: + Couldn't match expected type ‛T a1’ with actual type ‛Maybe b’ + The type variable ‛a1’ is ambiguous + Relevant bindings include + bar2 :: b -> Maybe b -> Int (bound at T4099.hs:14:1) + a :: b (bound at T4099.hs:14:6) + x :: Maybe b (bound at T4099.hs:14:8) + In the second argument of ‛foo’, namely ‛x’ + In the expression: foo (error "urk") x + In an equation for ‛bar2’: bar2 a x = foo (error "urk") x diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T4174.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T4174.stderr index 81fb603dd8..5547b25979 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T4174.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T4174.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ T4174.hs:42:12: - Couldn't match type `False' with `True' + Couldn't match type ‛False’ with ‛True’ Expected type: True Actual type: GHCVersion (WayOf m) :>=: GHC6'10 Minor1 In the expression: sync_large_objects - In an equation for `testcase': testcase = sync_large_objects + In an equation for ‛testcase’: testcase = sync_large_objects diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T4179.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T4179.stderr index 7236a50c88..8f5ded1ffe 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T4179.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T4179.stderr @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ T4179.hs:26:16: fCon :: (Functor x, DoC (FCon x)) => Con x -> A2 (FCon x) -> A3 (FCon x) at T4179.hs:25:9-72 - NB: `A3' is a type function, and may not be injective + NB: ‛A3’ is a type function, and may not be injective Expected type: x (A2 (FCon x) -> A3 (FCon x)) -> A2 (FCon x) -> A3 (FCon x) Actual type: x (A2 (FCon x) -> A3 (FCon x)) @@ -16,6 +16,6 @@ T4179.hs:26:16: Relevant bindings include fCon :: Con x -> A2 (FCon x) -> A3 (FCon x) (bound at T4179.hs:26:1) - In the first argument of `foldDoC', namely `op' + In the first argument of ‛foldDoC’, namely ‛op’ In the expression: foldDoC op - In an equation for `fCon': fCon = foldDoC op + In an equation for ‛fCon’: fCon = foldDoC op diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T4272.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T4272.stderr index a4e952556b..f3dcdbc13d 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T4272.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T4272.stderr @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ T4272.hs:15:26: bound by the type signature for laws :: TermLike a => TermFamily a a -> b at T4272.hs:14:9-53 - `a' is a rigid type variable bound by + ‛a’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for laws :: TermLike a => TermFamily a a -> b at T4272.hs:14:16 Expected type: TermFamily a (TermFamily a a) @@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ T4272.hs:15:26: Relevant bindings include laws :: TermFamily a a -> b (bound at T4272.hs:15:1) t :: TermFamily a a (bound at T4272.hs:15:6) - In the first argument of `terms', namely - `(undefined :: TermFamily a a)' - In the second argument of `prune', namely - `(terms (undefined :: TermFamily a a))' + In the first argument of ‛terms’, namely + ‛(undefined :: TermFamily a a)’ + In the second argument of ‛prune’, namely + ‛(terms (undefined :: TermFamily a a))’ In the expression: prune t (terms (undefined :: TermFamily a a)) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T4485.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T4485.stderr index 3588869520..bd408824bf 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T4485.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T4485.stderr @@ -1,30 +1,30 @@ -
-T4485.hs:47:15:
- Overlapping instances for EmbedAsChild
- (IdentityT IO) (XMLGenT m0 (XML m0))
- arising from a use of `asChild'
- Matching instances:
- instance [overlap ok] (EmbedAsChild m c, m1 ~ m) =>
- EmbedAsChild m (XMLGenT m1 c)
- -- Defined at T4485.hs:29:10
- instance [overlap ok] EmbedAsChild
- (IdentityT IO) (XMLGenT Identity ())
- -- Defined at T4485.hs:42:10
- (The choice depends on the instantiation of `m0'
- To pick the first instance above, use -XIncoherentInstances
- when compiling the other instance declarations)
- In the expression: asChild
- In the expression: asChild $ (genElement "foo")
- In an equation for `asChild':
- asChild b = asChild $ (genElement "foo")
-
-T4485.hs:47:26:
- No instance for (XMLGen m0) arising from a use of `genElement'
- The type variable `m0' is ambiguous
- Note: there is a potential instance available:
- instance [overlap ok] XMLGen (IdentityT m)
- -- Defined at T4485.hs:36:10
- In the second argument of `($)', namely `(genElement "foo")'
- In the expression: asChild $ (genElement "foo")
- In an equation for `asChild':
- asChild b = asChild $ (genElement "foo")
+ +T4485.hs:47:15: + Overlapping instances for EmbedAsChild + (IdentityT IO) (XMLGenT m0 (XML m0)) + arising from a use of ‛asChild’ + Matching instances: + instance [overlap ok] (EmbedAsChild m c, m1 ~ m) => + EmbedAsChild m (XMLGenT m1 c) + -- Defined at T4485.hs:29:10 + instance [overlap ok] EmbedAsChild + (IdentityT IO) (XMLGenT Identity ()) + -- Defined at T4485.hs:42:10 + (The choice depends on the instantiation of ‛m0’ + To pick the first instance above, use -XIncoherentInstances + when compiling the other instance declarations) + In the expression: asChild + In the expression: asChild $ (genElement "foo") + In an equation for ‛asChild’: + asChild b = asChild $ (genElement "foo") + +T4485.hs:47:26: + No instance for (XMLGen m0) arising from a use of ‛genElement’ + The type variable ‛m0’ is ambiguous + Note: there is a potential instance available: + instance [overlap ok] XMLGen (IdentityT m) + -- Defined at T4485.hs:36:10 + In the second argument of ‛($)’, namely ‛(genElement "foo")’ + In the expression: asChild $ (genElement "foo") + In an equation for ‛asChild’: + asChild b = asChild $ (genElement "foo") diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T5439.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T5439.stderr index 7115f3026d..4f8340481f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T5439.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T5439.stderr @@ -1,28 +1,28 @@ -
-T5439.hs:83:28:
- Couldn't match type `Attempt t0 -> Attempt (HElemOf l0)'
- with `Attempt (HElemOf rs)'
- Expected type: f (Attempt (HNth n0 l0) -> Attempt (HElemOf l0))
- Actual type: f (Attempt (WaitOpResult (WaitOps rs)))
- Relevant bindings include
- registerWaitOp :: WaitOps rs
- -> f (Attempt (WaitOpResult (WaitOps rs))) -> IO Bool
- (bound at T5439.hs:62:3)
- ops :: WaitOps rs (bound at T5439.hs:62:18)
- ev :: f (Attempt (WaitOpResult (WaitOps rs)))
- (bound at T5439.hs:62:22)
- register :: Bool -> Peano n -> WaitOps (HDrop n rs) -> IO Bool
- (bound at T5439.hs:65:9)
- In the first argument of `complete', namely `ev'
- In the expression: complete ev
- In a stmt of a 'do' block:
- c <- complete ev $ inj $ Failure (e :: SomeException)
-
-T5439.hs:83:39:
- Couldn't match expected type `Peano n0'
- with actual type `Attempt α0'
- In the return type of a call of `Failure'
- In the second argument of `($)', namely
- `Failure (e :: SomeException)'
- In the second argument of `($)', namely
- `inj $ Failure (e :: SomeException)'
+ +T5439.hs:83:28: + Couldn't match type ‛Attempt t0 -> Attempt (HElemOf l0)’ + with ‛Attempt (HElemOf rs)’ + Expected type: f (Attempt (HNth n0 l0) -> Attempt (HElemOf l0)) + Actual type: f (Attempt (WaitOpResult (WaitOps rs))) + Relevant bindings include + registerWaitOp :: WaitOps rs + -> f (Attempt (WaitOpResult (WaitOps rs))) -> IO Bool + (bound at T5439.hs:62:3) + ops :: WaitOps rs (bound at T5439.hs:62:18) + ev :: f (Attempt (WaitOpResult (WaitOps rs))) + (bound at T5439.hs:62:22) + register :: Bool -> Peano n -> WaitOps (HDrop n rs) -> IO Bool + (bound at T5439.hs:65:9) + In the first argument of ‛complete’, namely ‛ev’ + In the expression: complete ev + In a stmt of a 'do' block: + c <- complete ev $ inj $ Failure (e :: SomeException) + +T5439.hs:83:39: + Couldn't match expected type ‛Peano n0’ + with actual type ‛Attempt α0’ + In the return type of a call of ‛Failure’ + In the second argument of ‛($)’, namely + ‛Failure (e :: SomeException)’ + In the second argument of ‛($)’, namely + ‛inj $ Failure (e :: SomeException)’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T5515.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T5515.stderr index 535048d88b..c3d6b9f664 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T5515.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T5515.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ T5515.hs:9:8: - The RHS of an associated type declaration mentions type variable `a' + The RHS of an associated type declaration mentions type variable ‛a’ All such variables must be bound on the LHS T5515.hs:15:8: - The RHS of an associated type declaration mentions type variable `a' + The RHS of an associated type declaration mentions type variable ‛a’ All such variables must be bound on the LHS diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T5934.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T5934.stderr index 8925899346..d036467603 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T5934.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T5934.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -
-T5934.hs:12:7:
- Cannot instantiate unification variable `a0'
- with a type involving foralls: (forall s. GenST s) -> Int
- Perhaps you want -XImpredicativeTypes
- In the expression: 0
- In an equation for `run': run = 0
+ +T5934.hs:12:7: + Cannot instantiate unification variable ‛a0’ + with a type involving foralls: (forall s. GenST s) -> Int + Perhaps you want -XImpredicativeTypes + In the expression: 0 + In an equation for ‛run’: run = 0 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T6123.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T6123.stderr index cf8eedda06..4fbdf9bf4b 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T6123.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T6123.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -
-T6123.hs:10:14:
- Occurs check: cannot construct the infinite type: a0 ~ Id a0
- The type variable `a0' is ambiguous
- Relevant bindings include cundefined :: a0 (bound at T6123.hs:10:1)
- In the expression: cid undefined
- In an equation for `cundefined': cundefined = cid undefined
+ +T6123.hs:10:14: + Occurs check: cannot construct the infinite type: a0 ~ Id a0 + The type variable ‛a0’ is ambiguous + Relevant bindings include cundefined :: a0 (bound at T6123.hs:10:1) + In the expression: cid undefined + In an equation for ‛cundefined’: cundefined = cid undefined diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T7010.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T7010.stderr index 3d059736f1..50c4bd0fd0 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T7010.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T7010.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ T7010.hs:53:27: - Couldn't match type `Serial (IO Float)' with `IO Float' + Couldn't match type ‛Serial (IO Float)’ with ‛IO Float’ Expected type: (Float, ValueTuple Vector) Actual type: (Float, ValueTuple Float) - In the first argument of `withArgs', namely `plug' + In the first argument of ‛withArgs’, namely ‛plug’ In the expression: withArgs plug - In an equation for `filterFormants': filterFormants = withArgs plug + In an equation for ‛filterFormants’: filterFormants = withArgs plug diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T7194.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T7194.stderr index 385765df6f..a575dde330 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T7194.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T7194.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ T7194.hs:18:35: - Couldn't match expected type `b0' with actual type `F a' - because type variable `a' would escape its scope + Couldn't match expected type ‛b0’ with actual type ‛F a’ + because type variable ‛a’ would escape its scope This (rigid, skolem) type variable is bound by the type signature for g :: C (F a) => a -> Int at T7194.hs:17:23-41 @@ -9,6 +9,6 @@ T7194.hs:18:35: x :: b0 (bound at T7194.hs:17:9) g :: a -> Int (bound at T7194.hs:18:18) y :: a (bound at T7194.hs:18:20) - In the return type of a call of `foo' + In the return type of a call of ‛foo’ In the expression: foo y - In the first argument of `length', namely `[x, foo y]' + In the first argument of ‛length’, namely ‛[x, foo y]’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T7354.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T7354.stderr index d5c0f1ce56..1fb91e4dad 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T7354.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T7354.stderr @@ -6,6 +6,6 @@ T7354.hs:28:11: Actual type: Prim [a] a -> a Relevant bindings include foo :: Prim [a] a -> t (bound at T7354.hs:28:1) - In the first argument of `ana', namely `alg' + In the first argument of ‛ana’, namely ‛alg’ In the expression: ana alg - In an equation for `foo': foo = ana alg + In an equation for ‛foo’: foo = ana alg diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T7354a.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T7354a.stderr index 1b66b87970..d05b0f9b68 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T7354a.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T7354a.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ T7354a.hs:5:13: - Couldn't match expected type `Base t t' with actual type `()' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Base t t’ with actual type ‛()’ Relevant bindings include foo :: t (bound at T7354a.hs:5:1) - In the first argument of `embed', namely `()' + In the first argument of ‛embed’, namely ‛()’ In the expression: embed () - In an equation for `foo': foo = embed () + In an equation for ‛foo’: foo = embed () diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T7536.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T7536.stderr index faea85e91e..0c242a9029 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T7536.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/T7536.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ T7536.hs:8:15: - Family instance purports to bind type variable `a' + Family instance purports to bind type variable ‛a’ but the real LHS (expanding synonyms) is: TF Int = ... - In the type instance declaration for `TF' + In the type instance declaration for ‛TF’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/TyFamArity1.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/TyFamArity1.stderr index b0076287f6..adfcc37a00 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/TyFamArity1.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/TyFamArity1.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -
-TyFamArity1.hs:4:15:
- Number of parameters must match family declaration; expected 2
- In the type instance declaration for `T'
+ +TyFamArity1.hs:4:15: + Number of parameters must match family declaration; expected 2 + In the type instance declaration for ‛T’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/TyFamArity2.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/TyFamArity2.stderr index ad71adc7d3..d602a2d5e0 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/TyFamArity2.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/TyFamArity2.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -
-TyFamArity2.hs:4:15:
- Number of parameters must match family declaration; expected 1
- In the type instance declaration for `T'
+ +TyFamArity2.hs:4:15: + Number of parameters must match family declaration; expected 1 + In the type instance declaration for ‛T’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/TyFamUndec.stderr b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/TyFamUndec.stderr index 6bb2af771c..fef47b534a 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/TyFamUndec.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/indexed-types/should_fail/TyFamUndec.stderr @@ -1,18 +1,18 @@ -
-TyFamUndec.hs:6:15:
- Variable `b' occurs more often than in the instance head
- in the type family application: T (b, b)
- (Use -XUndecidableInstances to permit this)
- In the type instance declaration for `T'
-
-TyFamUndec.hs:7:15:
- Application is no smaller than the instance head
- in the type family application: T (a, Maybe b)
- (Use -XUndecidableInstances to permit this)
- In the type instance declaration for `T'
-
-TyFamUndec.hs:8:15:
- Nested type family application
- in the type family application: T (a, T b)
- (Use -XUndecidableInstances to permit this)
- In the type instance declaration for `T'
+ +TyFamUndec.hs:6:15: + Variable ‛b’ occurs more often than in the instance head + in the type family application: T (b, b) + (Use -XUndecidableInstances to permit this) + In the type instance declaration for ‛T’ + +TyFamUndec.hs:7:15: + Application is no smaller than the instance head + in the type family application: T (a, Maybe b) + (Use -XUndecidableInstances to permit this) + In the type instance declaration for ‛T’ + +TyFamUndec.hs:8:15: + Nested type family application + in the type family application: T (a, T b) + (Use -XUndecidableInstances to permit this) + In the type instance declaration for ‛T’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/mdo/should_fail/mdofail001.stderr b/testsuite/tests/mdo/should_fail/mdofail001.stderr index 67929e58ed..8d6d86bc97 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/mdo/should_fail/mdofail001.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/mdo/should_fail/mdofail001.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ mdofail001.hs:10:32: - No instance for (Num Char) arising from the literal `1' + No instance for (Num Char) arising from the literal ‛1’ In the expression: 1 - In the first argument of `l', namely `[1, 2, 3]' + In the first argument of ‛l’, namely ‛[1, 2, 3]’ In the expression: l [1, 2, 3] diff --git a/testsuite/tests/mdo/should_fail/mdofail002.stderr b/testsuite/tests/mdo/should_fail/mdofail002.stderr index a1327c6dfd..badd7383e7 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/mdo/should_fail/mdofail002.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/mdo/should_fail/mdofail002.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ mdofail002.hs:10:9: - Conflicting definitions for `x' + Conflicting definitions for ‛x’ Bound at: mdofail002.hs:10:9 mdofail002.hs:11:9 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/mdo/should_fail/mdofail003.stderr b/testsuite/tests/mdo/should_fail/mdofail003.stderr index e093fe0a75..ccb10dfb80 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/mdo/should_fail/mdofail003.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/mdo/should_fail/mdofail003.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ mdofail003.hs:10:9: - Conflicting definitions for `x' + Conflicting definitions for ‛x’ Bound at: mdofail003.hs:10:9 mdofail003.hs:11:13 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/T414.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/T414.stderr index a5052fb76d..b9af6935f5 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/T414.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/T414.stderr @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ T414.hs:1:1: - The main function `main' is not exported by module `Main' + The main function ‛main’ is not exported by module ‛Main’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod1.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod1.stderr index e665f8468e..51d9e07b1d 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod1.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod1.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ mod1.hs:3:1: - Failed to load interface for `N' + Failed to load interface for ‛N’ Use -v to see a list of the files searched for. diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod10.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod10.stderr index 5369fa0f8b..6cc2caf59e 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod10.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod10.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -mod10.hs:2:10: Not in scope: type constructor or class `T' +mod10.hs:2:10: Not in scope: type constructor or class ‛T’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod101.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod101.stderr index 662c38e89a..306884fa8f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod101.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod101.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ mod101.hs:8:5: - Not in scope: data constructor `ConB' - Perhaps you meant `ConA' (imported from Mod101_AuxB) + Not in scope: data constructor ‛ConB’ + Perhaps you meant ‛ConA’ (imported from Mod101_AuxB) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod102.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod102.stderr index 60f7b28ab2..a33246f12c 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod102.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod102.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ mod102.hs:8:5: - Not in scope: `methB' - Perhaps you meant `methA' (imported from Mod102_AuxB) + Not in scope: ‛methB’ + Perhaps you meant ‛methA’ (imported from Mod102_AuxB) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod110.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod110.stderr index e1c2eb1b0b..f394f56214 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod110.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod110.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ mod110.hs:11:10: - Ambiguous occurrence `Eq' - It could refer to either `M.Eq', defined at mod110.hs:7:7 - or `Prelude.Eq', - imported from `Prelude' at mod110.hs:4:1-14 - (and originally defined in `GHC.Classes') + Ambiguous occurrence ‛Eq’ + It could refer to either ‛M.Eq’, defined at mod110.hs:7:7 + or ‛Prelude.Eq’, + imported from ‛Prelude’ at mod110.hs:4:1-14 + (and originally defined in ‛GHC.Classes’) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod114.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod114.stderr index be7202ce01..84131b47f5 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod114.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod114.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -mod114.hs:3:16: Not in scope: type constructor or class `Stuff' +mod114.hs:3:16: Not in scope: type constructor or class ‛Stuff’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod116.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod116.stderr index c9fb1ded5f..c46059c5d6 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod116.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod116.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -mod116.hs:2:18: Not in scope: type constructor or class `M2' +mod116.hs:2:18: Not in scope: type constructor or class ‛M2’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod120.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod120.stderr index 0d6181e61a..2643f9258f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod120.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod120.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -mod120.hs:5:5: Not in scope: data constructor `Foo' +mod120.hs:5:5: Not in scope: data constructor ‛Foo’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod121.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod121.stderr index 7c2cf2cc9d..16ea4bf627 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod121.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod121.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ mod121.hs:5:5: - Not in scope: `m2' - Perhaps you meant `m1' (imported from Mod121_A) + Not in scope: ‛m2’ + Perhaps you meant ‛m1’ (imported from Mod121_A) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod122.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod122.stderr index b65f8e9964..45e4f1699c 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod122.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod122.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -mod122.hs:5:6: Not in scope: type constructor or class `C' +mod122.hs:5:6: Not in scope: type constructor or class ‛C’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod123.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod123.stderr index 91f75483d3..b631454857 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod123.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod123.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -mod123.hs:5:6: Not in scope: type constructor or class `T' +mod123.hs:5:6: Not in scope: type constructor or class ‛T’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod124.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod124.stderr index 22644aa07b..66cad7ee36 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod124.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod124.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -mod124.hs:6:6: Not in scope: type constructor or class `T' +mod124.hs:6:6: Not in scope: type constructor or class ‛T’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod125.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod125.stderr index b2f7fa4503..9fa21e7875 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod125.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod125.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -mod125.hs:7:5: Not in scope: data constructor `T' +mod125.hs:7:5: Not in scope: data constructor ‛T’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod126.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod126.stderr index 22243759ca..474e6eb490 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod126.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod126.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -mod126.hs:7:5: Not in scope: data constructor `T' +mod126.hs:7:5: Not in scope: data constructor ‛T’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod127.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod127.stderr index 5ffb1b71b6..b208503368 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod127.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod127.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -mod127.hs:6:6: Not in scope: type constructor or class `T' +mod127.hs:6:6: Not in scope: type constructor or class ‛T’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod128.stderr-ghc b/testsuite/tests/module/mod128.stderr-ghc index 18c7864048..4363290fb3 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod128.stderr-ghc +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod128.stderr-ghc @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -Mod128_A.hs:2:19: Warning: `T' is exported by `T(Con)' and `T' +Mod128_A.hs:2:19: Warning: ‛T’ is exported by ‛T(Con)’ and ‛T’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod130.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod130.stderr index 27d3f8470e..bb1aff176b 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod130.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod130.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -mod130.hs:7:5: Not in scope: `<' +mod130.hs:7:5: Not in scope: ‛<’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod131.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod131.stderr index 15d9190464..2b877aaae3 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod131.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod131.stderr @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ mod131.hs:2:27: - Conflicting exports for `f': - `module Mod131_B' exports `f' - imported from `Mod131_B' at mod131.hs:3:17 + Conflicting exports for ‛f’: + ‛module Mod131_B’ exports ‛f’ + imported from ‛Mod131_B’ at mod131.hs:3:17 (and originally defined at Mod131_B.hs:3:1) - `Mod131_A.f' exports `Mod131_A.f' - imported qualified from `Mod131_A' at mod131.hs:4:27 + ‛Mod131_A.f’ exports ‛Mod131_A.f’ + imported qualified from ‛Mod131_A’ at mod131.hs:4:27 (and originally defined at Mod131_A.hs:3:1) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod132.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod132.stderr index 8dbf51014c..4afecd8f87 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod132.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod132.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -mod132.hs:6:7: Not in scope: data constructor `Foo' +mod132.hs:6:7: Not in scope: data constructor ‛Foo’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod134.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod134.stderr index ed8382db63..3270f93b68 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod134.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod134.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ mod134.hs:6:19: - Not in scope: `Prelude.head' + Not in scope: ‛Prelude.head’ Perhaps you meant one of these: - `Prelude.read' (imported from Prelude), - `Prelude.reads' (imported from Prelude), - `Prelude.snd' (imported from Prelude) + ‛Prelude.read’ (imported from Prelude), + ‛Prelude.reads’ (imported from Prelude), + ‛Prelude.snd’ (imported from Prelude) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod136.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod136.stderr index 242d20b3de..2a0feed97e 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod136.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod136.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ mod136.hs:6:5: - Not in scope: `zipWith5' + Not in scope: ‛zipWith5’ Perhaps you meant one of these: - `zipWith' (imported from Mod136_A), - `zipWith3' (imported from Mod136_A) + ‛zipWith’ (imported from Mod136_A), + ‛zipWith3’ (imported from Mod136_A) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod138.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod138.stderr index 2e8a5190d6..5b006ee326 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod138.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod138.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -mod138.hs:7:5: Not in scope: `isLatin1' +mod138.hs:7:5: Not in scope: ‛isLatin1’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod14.stderr-ghc b/testsuite/tests/module/mod14.stderr-ghc index be838c3886..9eec91d715 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod14.stderr-ghc +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod14.stderr-ghc @@ -1,4 +1,3 @@ -mod14.hs:2:10: - Warning: `m2' is exported by `C(m1, m2, m2, m3)' and `C(m1, m2, m2, - m3)' +mod14.hs:2:10: Warning: + ‛m2’ is exported by ‛C(m1, m2, m2, m3)’ and ‛C(m1, m2, m2, m3)’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod142.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod142.stderr index fcd7665aaa..f31723d020 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod142.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod142.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ mod142.hs:2:21: - Conflicting exports for `x': - `module Mod142_A' exports `Mod142_A.x' - imported from `Mod142_A' at mod142.hs:4:1-15 + Conflicting exports for ‛x’: + ‛module Mod142_A’ exports ‛Mod142_A.x’ + imported from ‛Mod142_A’ at mod142.hs:4:1-15 (and originally defined at Mod142_A.hs:3:1) - `module M' exports `M.x' defined at mod142.hs:6:1 + ‛module M’ exports ‛M.x’ defined at mod142.hs:6:1 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod143.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod143.stderr index 15042a21d8..cdec14c83e 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod143.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod143.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ mod143.hs:2:21: - Conflicting exports for `Foo': - `module Mod143_A' exports `Mod143_A.Foo' - imported from `Mod143_A' at mod143.hs:4:1-15 + Conflicting exports for ‛Foo’: + ‛module Mod143_A’ exports ‛Mod143_A.Foo’ + imported from ‛Mod143_A’ at mod143.hs:4:1-15 (and originally defined at Mod143_A.hs:3:6-8) - `module M' exports `M.Foo' defined at mod143.hs:6:6 + ‛module M’ exports ‛M.Foo’ defined at mod143.hs:6:6 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod144.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod144.stderr index 87c49abde1..9742a76111 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod144.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod144.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ mod144.hs:2:27: - Conflicting exports for `Bar': - `module Mod144_A' exports `Mod144_A.Bar' - imported from `Mod144_A' at mod144.hs:4:1-15 - `module M' exports `M.Bar' defined at mod144.hs:6:13 + Conflicting exports for ‛Bar’: + ‛module Mod144_A’ exports ‛Mod144_A.Bar’ + imported from ‛Mod144_A’ at mod144.hs:4:1-15 + ‛module M’ exports ‛M.Bar’ defined at mod144.hs:6:13 exit(1) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod145.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod145.stderr index fcbf0b6731..37109b3953 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod145.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod145.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ mod145.hs:2:30: - Conflicting exports for `m1': - `module Mod145_A' exports `Mod145_A.m1' - imported from `Mod145_A' at mod145.hs:4:1-15 + Conflicting exports for ‛m1’: + ‛module Mod145_A’ exports ‛Mod145_A.m1’ + imported from ‛Mod145_A’ at mod145.hs:4:1-15 (and originally defined at Mod145_A.hs:4:3-4) - `module Mod145' exports `Mod145.m1' defined at mod145.hs:7:3 + ‛module Mod145’ exports ‛Mod145.m1’ defined at mod145.hs:7:3 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod146.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod146.stderr index ef99dc3ca5..160c76c116 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod146.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod146.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ mod146.hs:2:30: - Conflicting exports for `m1': - `module Mod145_A' exports `Mod145_A.m1' - imported from `Mod145_A' at mod146.hs:4:1-15 - `module Mod146' exports `Mod146.m1' defined at mod146.hs:7:3 + Conflicting exports for ‛m1’: + ‛module Mod145_A’ exports ‛Mod145_A.m1’ + imported from ‛Mod145_A’ at mod146.hs:4:1-15 + ‛module Mod146’ exports ‛Mod146.m1’ defined at mod146.hs:7:3 exit(1) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod147.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod147.stderr index b3bbf76612..f57f2d8ad4 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod147.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod147.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -mod147.hs:6:5: Not in scope: data constructor `D' +mod147.hs:6:5: Not in scope: data constructor ‛D’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod150.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod150.stderr index 8ddd686940..e1748d7725 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod150.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod150.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ mod150.hs:2:20: - Conflicting exports for `id': - `module Prelude' exports `Prelude.id' - imported from `Prelude' at mod150.hs:2:8 - (and originally defined in `GHC.Base') - `module M' exports `M.id' defined at mod150.hs:2:42 + Conflicting exports for ‛id’: + ‛module Prelude’ exports ‛Prelude.id’ + imported from ‛Prelude’ at mod150.hs:2:8 + (and originally defined in ‛GHC.Base’) + ‛module M’ exports ‛M.id’ defined at mod150.hs:2:42 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod151.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod151.stderr index 3206da9de0..505fdb8c4c 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod151.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod151.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ mod151.hs:2:20: - Ambiguous occurrence `id' - It could refer to either `M.id', defined at mod151.hs:2:30 - or `Prelude.id', - imported from `Prelude' at mod151.hs:2:8 - (and originally defined in `GHC.Base') + Ambiguous occurrence ‛id’ + It could refer to either ‛M.id’, defined at mod151.hs:2:30 + or ‛Prelude.id’, + imported from ‛Prelude’ at mod151.hs:2:8 + (and originally defined in ‛GHC.Base’) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod152.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod152.stderr index 1ad302287f..e385e1e6e4 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod152.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod152.stderr @@ -1,14 +1,14 @@ mod152.hs:2:26: - Ambiguous occurrence `id' - It could refer to either `M.id', defined at mod152.hs:2:36 - or `Prelude.id', - imported from `Prelude' at mod152.hs:2:8 - (and originally defined in `GHC.Base') + Ambiguous occurrence ‛id’ + It could refer to either ‛M.id’, defined at mod152.hs:2:36 + or ‛Prelude.id’, + imported from ‛Prelude’ at mod152.hs:2:8 + (and originally defined in ‛GHC.Base’) mod152.hs:2:26: - Conflicting exports for `id': - `module Prelude' exports `Prelude.id' - imported from `Prelude' at mod152.hs:2:8 - (and originally defined in `GHC.Base') - `id' exports `M.id' defined at mod152.hs:2:36 + Conflicting exports for ‛id’: + ‛module Prelude’ exports ‛Prelude.id’ + imported from ‛Prelude’ at mod152.hs:2:8 + (and originally defined in ‛GHC.Base’) + ‛id’ exports ‛M.id’ defined at mod152.hs:2:36 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod153.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod153.stderr index da4751b7b4..79532da846 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod153.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod153.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ mod153.hs:2:11: - Ambiguous occurrence `id' - It could refer to either `M.id', defined at mod153.hs:2:21 - or `Prelude.id', - imported from `Prelude' at mod153.hs:2:8 - (and originally defined in `GHC.Base') + Ambiguous occurrence ‛id’ + It could refer to either ‛M.id’, defined at mod153.hs:2:21 + or ‛Prelude.id’, + imported from ‛Prelude’ at mod153.hs:2:8 + (and originally defined in ‛GHC.Base’) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod155.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod155.stderr index 889e9772c9..8c02662978 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod155.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod155.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ mod155.hs:2:10: - Conflicting exports for `id': - `module M' exports `M.id' - imported from `Prelude' at mod155.hs:4:1-19 - (and originally defined in `GHC.Base') - `module M' exports `M.id' defined at mod155.hs:5:1 + Conflicting exports for ‛id’: + ‛module M’ exports ‛M.id’ + imported from ‛Prelude’ at mod155.hs:4:1-19 + (and originally defined in ‛GHC.Base’) + ‛module M’ exports ‛M.id’ defined at mod155.hs:5:1 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod158.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod158.stderr index 7f6c7d7e85..412c05c1b7 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod158.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod158.stderr @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ -mod158.hs:12:5: Not in scope: data constructor `C' +mod158.hs:12:5: Not in scope: data constructor ‛C’ exit(1) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod160.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod160.stderr index c2dbd5647a..1a27420f61 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod160.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod160.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ mod160.hs:12:5: - Not in scope: `m3' + Not in scope: ‛m3’ Perhaps you meant one of these: - `m1' (imported from Mod159_D), `m2' (imported from Mod159_D) + ‛m1’ (imported from Mod159_D), ‛m2’ (imported from Mod159_D) exit(1) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod161.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod161.stderr index 1272093eaa..f5dc9fd378 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod161.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod161.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -mod161.hs:2:12: Not in scope: `bar' +mod161.hs:2:12: Not in scope: ‛bar’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod164.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod164.stderr index 5f18adc025..e6ebc70bca 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod164.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod164.stderr @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ mod164.hs:9:5: - Ambiguous occurrence `D1' - It could refer to either `Mod164_A.D1', - imported from `Mod164_A' at mod164.hs:4:1-15 + Ambiguous occurrence ‛D1’ + It could refer to either ‛Mod164_A.D1’, + imported from ‛Mod164_A’ at mod164.hs:4:1-15 (and originally defined at Mod164_A.hs:3:10-11) - or `Mod164_B.D1', - imported from `Mod164_B' at mod164.hs:5:1-15 + or ‛Mod164_B.D1’, + imported from ‛Mod164_B’ at mod164.hs:5:1-15 (and originally defined at Mod164_B.hs:3:10-11) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod165.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod165.stderr index 293eb993cc..334ad0c7f8 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod165.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod165.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ mod165.hs:9:5: - Ambiguous occurrence `A.D1' - It could refer to either `A.D1', - imported from `Mod164_A' at mod165.hs:4:1-20 - or `A.D1', imported from `Mod164_B' at mod165.hs:5:1-20 + Ambiguous occurrence ‛A.D1’ + It could refer to either ‛A.D1’, + imported from ‛Mod164_A’ at mod165.hs:4:1-20 + or ‛A.D1’, imported from ‛Mod164_B’ at mod165.hs:5:1-20 exit(1) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod17.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod17.stderr index 1192637967..3a911609dd 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod17.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod17.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ mod17.hs:2:10: - The export item `C(m1, m2, m3, Left)' + The export item ‛C(m1, m2, m3, Left)’ attempts to export constructors or class methods that are not visible here diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod174.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod174.stderr index 6ef2e753d0..020f942087 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod174.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod174.stderr @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ mod174.hs:1:1: - The main function `main' is not exported by module `Main' + The main function ‛main’ is not exported by module ‛Main’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod176.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod176.stderr index 7301324a91..4dcd689a8a 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod176.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod176.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -mod176.hs:4:1: - Warning: The import of `return, Monad' - from module `Control.Monad' is redundant +mod176.hs:4:1: Warning: + The import of ‛return, Monad’ + from module ‛Control.Monad’ is redundant diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod177.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod177.stderr index 1dc7c5c6ae..fe82c64569 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod177.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod177.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -mod177.hs:4:1: - Warning: The import of `Data.Maybe' is redundant - except perhaps to import instances from `Data.Maybe' - To import instances alone, use: import Data.Maybe() +mod177.hs:4:1: Warning: + The import of ‛Data.Maybe’ is redundant + except perhaps to import instances from ‛Data.Maybe’ + To import instances alone, use: import Data.Maybe() diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod178.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod178.stderr index 3edd9a4066..755324b58c 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod178.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod178.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ Mod178_2.hs:1:1: File name does not match module name: - Saw: `Main' - Expected: `Mod178_2' + Saw: ‛Main’ + Expected: ‛Mod178_2’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod18.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod18.stderr index 5f8ba3457b..1ef381f90e 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod18.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod18.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ mod18.hs:3:6: - Multiple declarations of `T' + Multiple declarations of ‛T’ Declared at: mod18.hs:2:6 mod18.hs:3:6 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod180.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod180.stderr index 2790d92a33..2647f2ada7 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod180.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod180.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ mod180.hs:8:5: - Couldn't match expected type `T' with actual type `main:Mod180_A.T' + Couldn't match expected type ‛T’ with actual type ‛main:Mod180_A.T’ In the expression: x - In an equation for `z': z = x + In an equation for ‛z’: z = x diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod19.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod19.stderr index 9178ceba40..fd2f5f3192 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod19.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod19.stderr @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ mod19.hs:3:7: - Multiple declarations of `C' + Multiple declarations of ‛C’ Declared at: mod19.hs:2:7 mod19.hs:3:7 mod19.hs:3:17: - Multiple declarations of `m' + Multiple declarations of ‛m’ Declared at: mod19.hs:2:17 mod19.hs:3:17 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod2.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod2.stderr index e928ab3b19..c98e3f5ce6 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod2.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod2.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ mod2.hs:3:1: - Failed to load interface for `N' + Failed to load interface for ‛N’ Use -v to see a list of the files searched for. diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod20.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod20.stderr index 123564201a..eb92e4a021 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod20.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod20.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ mod20.hs:3:18: - Multiple declarations of `m' + Multiple declarations of ‛m’ Declared at: mod20.hs:2:18 mod20.hs:3:18 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod21.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod21.stderr index b5a86c0749..34620a6bd4 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod21.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod21.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ mod21.hs:3:6: - Multiple declarations of `T' + Multiple declarations of ‛T’ Declared at: mod21.hs:2:6 mod21.hs:3:6 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod22.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod22.stderr index 786043d4f2..0e05809361 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod22.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod22.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ mod22.hs:3:11: - Multiple declarations of `K' + Multiple declarations of ‛K’ Declared at: mod22.hs:2:11 mod22.hs:3:11 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod23.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod23.stderr index 3085cfff37..77f37d3c22 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod23.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod23.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ mod23.hs:3:8: - Conflicting definitions for `a' + Conflicting definitions for ‛a’ Bound at: mod23.hs:3:8 mod23.hs:3:10 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod24.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod24.stderr index 12ed89e59a..9f2bb54798 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod24.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod24.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ mod24.hs:3:8: - Conflicting definitions for `a' + Conflicting definitions for ‛a’ Bound at: mod24.hs:3:8 mod24.hs:3:10 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod25.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod25.stderr index 49a15454aa..6d8fd0349d 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod25.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod25.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -mod25.hs:3:16: Not in scope: type variable `b' +mod25.hs:3:16: Not in scope: type variable ‛b’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod26.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod26.stderr index 914f879d61..0ee82dc57f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod26.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod26.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -mod26.hs:3:21: Not in scope: type variable `b' +mod26.hs:3:21: Not in scope: type variable ‛b’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod29.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod29.stderr index ba62a734f0..2abdd7d1de 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod29.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod29.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -mod29.hs:6:12: Not in scope: type constructor or class `Char' +mod29.hs:6:12: Not in scope: type constructor or class ‛Char’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod3.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod3.stderr index 2b0cae95fa..f07a431b45 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod3.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod3.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ mod3.hs:2:10: - The export item `T(K1)' + The export item ‛T(K1)’ attempts to export constructors or class methods that are not visible here diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod36.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod36.stderr index 9d6b97bfa9..6ec42d92b0 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod36.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod36.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -mod36.hs:5:5: Not in scope: `const' +mod36.hs:5:5: Not in scope: ‛const’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod38.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod38.stderr index b04dd77f4b..7c5f277048 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod38.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod38.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ mod38.hs:4:7: - Multiple declarations of `C' + Multiple declarations of ‛C’ Declared at: mod38.hs:3:6 mod38.hs:4:7 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod4.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod4.stderr index 84d7cfa19e..38ea462fde 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod4.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod4.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ mod4.hs:2:10: - The export item `T(K1, K2)' + The export item ‛T(K1, K2)’ attempts to export constructors or class methods that are not visible here diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod40.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod40.stderr index ed77e80f82..aa641e4d8a 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod40.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod40.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ mod40.hs:3:1: Cycle in class declaration (via superclasses): C1 -> C2 -> C1 - In the class declaration for `C1' + In the class declaration for ‛C1’ mod40.hs:4:1: Cycle in class declaration (via superclasses): C2 -> C1 -> C2 - In the class declaration for `C2' + In the class declaration for ‛C2’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod41.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod41.stderr index 5ec4355fbe..921fc95942 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod41.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod41.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ mod41.hs:3:18: - Illegal instance declaration for `Eq (Either a a)' + Illegal instance declaration for ‛Eq (Either a a)’ (All instance types must be of the form (T a1 ... an) where a1 ... an are *distinct type variables*, and each type variable appears at most once in the instance head. Use -XFlexibleInstances if you want to disable this.) - In the instance declaration for `Eq (Either a a)' + In the instance declaration for ‛Eq (Either a a)’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod42.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod42.stderr index 319f42ba05..8fd553febd 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod42.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod42.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ mod42.hs:3:10: - Illegal instance declaration for `Eq a' + Illegal instance declaration for ‛Eq a’ (All instance types must be of the form (T a1 ... an) where a1 ... an are *distinct type variables*, and each type variable appears at most once in the instance head. Use -XFlexibleInstances if you want to disable this.) - In the instance declaration for `Eq a' + In the instance declaration for ‛Eq a’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod43.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod43.stderr index 7fc4da0b8b..5630a4ae58 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod43.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod43.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ mod43.hs:3:10: - Illegal instance declaration for `Eq String' - (All instance types must be of the form (T t1 ... tn) - where T is not a synonym. - Use -XTypeSynonymInstances if you want to disable this.) - In the instance declaration for `Eq String' + Illegal instance declaration for ‛Eq String’ + (All instance types must be of the form (T t1 ... tn) + where T is not a synonym. + Use -XTypeSynonymInstances if you want to disable this.) + In the instance declaration for ‛Eq String’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod45.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod45.stderr index 8aadf22b10..2673763cb0 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod45.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod45.stderr @@ -3,4 +3,4 @@ mod45.hs:5:11: Illegal type signature in instance declaration: (==) :: T -> T -> Bool (Use -XInstanceSigs to allow this) - In the instance declaration for `Eq T' + In the instance declaration for ‛Eq T’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod46.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod46.stderr index c4c8203266..516215c679 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod46.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod46.stderr @@ -2,4 +2,4 @@ mod46.hs:4:10: No instance for (Eq T) arising from the superclasses of an instance declaration - In the instance declaration for `Ord T' + In the instance declaration for ‛Ord T’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod47.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod47.stderr index 1b8fd0b411..44aba92178 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod47.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod47.stderr @@ -6,4 +6,4 @@ mod47.hs:6:10: bound by the instance declaration at mod47.hs:6:10-34 Possible fix: add (Num a) to the context of the instance declaration - In the instance declaration for `Bar [a]' + In the instance declaration for ‛Bar [a]’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod49.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod49.stderr index f08b36e0c4..f0fca3e7ad 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod49.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod49.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -mod49.hs:5:3: `y' is not a (visible) method of class `C' +mod49.hs:5:3: ‛y’ is not a (visible) method of class ‛C’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod5.stderr-ghc b/testsuite/tests/module/mod5.stderr-ghc index 7992560ca3..b48307ab37 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod5.stderr-ghc +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod5.stderr-ghc @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ -mod5.hs:2:10: - Warning: `K1' is exported by `T(K1, K1)' and `T(K1, K1)' +mod5.hs:2:10: Warning: + ‛K1’ is exported by ‛T(K1, K1)’ and ‛T(K1, K1)’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod50.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod50.stderr index 9357f7a2d8..453f2f2da3 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod50.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod50.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -mod50.hs:3:22: Not in scope: type constructor or class `Foo' +mod50.hs:3:22: Not in scope: type constructor or class ‛Foo’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod53.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod53.stderr index 2e142a5bfb..4129d39959 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod53.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod53.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -
-mod53.hs:4:22:
- Can't make a derived instance of `C T':
- `C' is not a derivable class
- In the data declaration for `T'
+ +mod53.hs:4:22: + Can't make a derived instance of ‛C T’: + ‛C’ is not a derivable class + In the data declaration for ‛T’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod55.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod55.stderr index 9db5ea55cc..a1f388f339 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod55.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod55.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ -
-mod55.hs:3:26:
- Can't make a derived instance of `Enum T':
- `T' must be an enumeration type
- (an enumeration consists of one or more nullary, non-GADT constructors)
- In the data declaration for `T'
+ +mod55.hs:3:26: + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Enum T’: + ‛T’ must be an enumeration type + (an enumeration consists of one or more nullary, non-GADT constructors) + In the data declaration for ‛T’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod56.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod56.stderr index db194406ed..44560cb764 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod56.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod56.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ -
-mod56.hs:4:39:
- Can't make a derived instance of `Ix T':
- `T' must be an enumeration type
- (an enumeration consists of one or more nullary, non-GADT constructors)
- or
- `T' must have precisely one constructor
- In the data declaration for `T'
+ +mod56.hs:4:39: + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Ix T’: + ‛T’ must be an enumeration type + (an enumeration consists of one or more nullary, non-GADT constructors) + or + ‛T’ must have precisely one constructor + In the data declaration for ‛T’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod59.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod59.stderr index c08db2a55f..26e74034ca 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod59.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod59.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -mod59.hs:3:3: Not in scope: data constructor `K' +mod59.hs:3:3: Not in scope: data constructor ‛K’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod60.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod60.stderr index f363cb933b..b25ee48b16 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod60.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod60.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ mod60.hs:3:4: - Constructor `Left' should have 1 argument, but has been given none + Constructor ‛Left’ should have 1 argument, but has been given none In the pattern: Left - In an equation for `f': f (Left) = error "foo" + In an equation for ‛f’: f (Left) = error "foo" diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod61.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod61.stderr index 3ac4937437..e96817f659 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod61.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod61.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ mod61.hs:3:11: Precedence parsing error - cannot mix `==' [infix 4] and `==' [infix 4] in the same infix expression + cannot mix ‛==’ [infix 4] and ‛==’ [infix 4] in the same infix expression diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod62.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod62.stderr index d435dbd6b9..cac9a6f32c 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod62.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod62.stderr @@ -2,5 +2,5 @@ mod62.hs:3:9: Qualified name in binding position: M.y mod62.hs:3:22: - Not in scope: `M.y' - Perhaps you meant `M.x' (line 3) + Not in scope: ‛M.y’ + Perhaps you meant ‛M.x’ (line 3) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod63.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod63.stderr index a4745b2e49..3a60973366 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod63.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod63.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ mod63.hs:3:1: - Equations for `f' have different numbers of arguments + Equations for ‛f’ have different numbers of arguments mod63.hs:3:1-8 mod63.hs:4:1-11 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod66.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod66.stderr index a1bf5a2af7..b5fc83fa57 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod66.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod66.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ mod66.hs:5:1: - Multiple declarations of `f' + Multiple declarations of ‛f’ Declared at: mod66.hs:3:1 mod66.hs:5:1 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod67.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod67.stderr index 2c2323b83f..a46c8ab03a 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod67.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod67.stderr @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ mod67.hs:3:1: - The type signature for `f' lacks an accompanying binding + The type signature for ‛f’ lacks an accompanying binding diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod68.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod68.stderr index f8490a06b6..0d46be073b 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod68.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod68.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -
-mod68.hs:4:1:
- Duplicate type signatures for `f'
- at mod68.hs:3:1
- mod68.hs:4:1
+ +mod68.hs:4:1: + Duplicate type signatures for ‛f’ + at mod68.hs:3:1 + mod68.hs:4:1 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod7.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod7.stderr index f9119cd786..5a446d3877 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod7.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod7.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -mod7.hs:2:10: Not in scope: type constructor or class `T' +mod7.hs:2:10: Not in scope: type constructor or class ‛T’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod72.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod72.stderr index 7f047d8023..b3ff8a9b3e 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod72.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod72.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -mod72.hs:3:7: Not in scope: `g' +mod72.hs:3:7: Not in scope: ‛g’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod73.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod73.stderr index f1234514b4..de23976383 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod73.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod73.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ mod73.hs:3:7: - Not in scope: `Prelude.g' + Not in scope: ‛Prelude.g’ Perhaps you meant one of these: - `Prelude.id' (imported from Prelude), - `Prelude.log' (imported from Prelude), - `Prelude.pi' (imported from Prelude) + ‛Prelude.id’ (imported from Prelude), + ‛Prelude.log’ (imported from Prelude), + ‛Prelude.pi’ (imported from Prelude) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod74.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod74.stderr index b4d417bac2..89d12d495c 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod74.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod74.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -mod74.hs:3:7: Not in scope: `N.g' +mod74.hs:3:7: Not in scope: ‛N.g’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod77.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod77.stderr index 0cb4920e31..1d05d71a07 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod77.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod77.stderr @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ mod77.hs:3:7: - The fixity signature for `$$$' lacks an accompanying binding + The fixity signature for ‛$$$’ lacks an accompanying binding diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod79.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod79.stderr index f8a185725e..329e47625f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod79.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod79.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -mod79.hs:3:16: Module `Prelude' does not export `C' +mod79.hs:3:16: Module ‛Prelude’ does not export ‛C’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod80.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod80.stderr index c56caf0ae6..7908ede6ee 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod80.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod80.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -mod80.hs:3:16: Module `Prelude' does not export `f' +mod80.hs:3:16: Module ‛Prelude’ does not export ‛f’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod81.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod81.stderr index d3f0d5c427..b3c31ddd38 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod81.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod81.stderr @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ mod81.hs:3:16: - Module `Prelude' does not export `Either(Left, Right, Foo)' + Module ‛Prelude’ does not export ‛Either(Left, Right, Foo)’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod87.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod87.stderr index 1536679aa6..99ad6bf351 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod87.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod87.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -mod87.hs:4:5: Not in scope: data constructor `Left' +mod87.hs:4:5: Not in scope: data constructor ‛Left’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod88.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod88.stderr index f166c864c7..707ad693e2 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod88.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod88.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -mod88.hs:5:5: Not in scope: data constructor `Prelude.Left' +mod88.hs:5:5: Not in scope: data constructor ‛Prelude.Left’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod89.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod89.stderr index c4eb78e428..653c93a810 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod89.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod89.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -mod89.hs:3:16: Module `Prelude' does not export `map(..)' +mod89.hs:3:16: Module ‛Prelude’ does not export ‛map(..)’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod9.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod9.stderr index 19bec80bb2..deee729ba9 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod9.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod9.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -mod9.hs:2:10: Not in scope: type constructor or class `T' +mod9.hs:2:10: Not in scope: type constructor or class ‛T’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod90.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod90.stderr index 7cc0b108ed..050b53c02e 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod90.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod90.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ mod90.hs:3:16: - In module `Prelude': - `Left' is a data constructor of `Either' + In module ‛Prelude’: + ‛Left’ is a data constructor of ‛Either’ To import it use - `import' Prelude( Either( Left ) ) + ‛import’ Prelude( Either( Left ) ) or - `import' Prelude( Either(..) ) + ‛import’ Prelude( Either(..) ) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod91.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod91.stderr index 5d7d6e1df6..0324f48a01 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod91.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod91.stderr @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ mod91.hs:3:16: - Module `Prelude' does not export `Eq((==), (/=), eq)' + Module ‛Prelude’ does not export ‛Eq((==), (/=), eq)’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/module/mod97.stderr b/testsuite/tests/module/mod97.stderr index fea2306c19..03891bc178 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/module/mod97.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/module/mod97.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -mod97.hs:4:9: Not in scope: `==' +mod97.hs:4:9: Not in scope: ‛==’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/overloadedlists/should_fail/overloadedlistsfail01.stderr b/testsuite/tests/overloadedlists/should_fail/overloadedlistsfail01.stderr index a08985f88e..cc1082c7de 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/overloadedlists/should_fail/overloadedlistsfail01.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/overloadedlists/should_fail/overloadedlistsfail01.stderr @@ -1,36 +1,36 @@ overloadedlistsfail01.hs:5:8: - No instance for (Show a0) arising from a use of `print' - The type variable `a0' is ambiguous + No instance for (Show a0) arising from a use of ‛print’ + The type variable ‛a0’ is ambiguous Note: there are several potential instances: - instance Show Double -- Defined in `GHC.Float' - instance Show Float -- Defined in `GHC.Float' + instance Show Double -- Defined in ‛GHC.Float’ + instance Show Float -- Defined in ‛GHC.Float’ instance (Integral a, Show a) => Show (GHC.Real.Ratio a) - -- Defined in `GHC.Real' + -- Defined in ‛GHC.Real’ ...plus 23 others In the expression: print [1] - In an equation for `main': main = print [1] + In an equation for ‛main’: main = print [1] overloadedlistsfail01.hs:5:14: No instance for (GHC.Exts.IsList a0) arising from an overloaded list - The type variable `a0' is ambiguous + The type variable ‛a0’ is ambiguous Note: there is a potential instance available: - instance GHC.Exts.IsList [a] -- Defined in `GHC.Exts' - In the first argument of `print', namely `[1]' + instance GHC.Exts.IsList [a] -- Defined in ‛GHC.Exts’ + In the first argument of ‛print’, namely ‛[1]’ In the expression: print [1] - In an equation for `main': main = print [1] + In an equation for ‛main’: main = print [1] overloadedlistsfail01.hs:5:15: No instance for (Num (GHC.Exts.Item a0)) - arising from the literal `1' - The type variable `a0' is ambiguous + arising from the literal ‛1’ + The type variable ‛a0’ is ambiguous Note: there are several potential instances: - instance Num Double -- Defined in `GHC.Float' - instance Num Float -- Defined in `GHC.Float' + instance Num Double -- Defined in ‛GHC.Float’ + instance Num Float -- Defined in ‛GHC.Float’ instance Integral a => Num (GHC.Real.Ratio a) - -- Defined in `GHC.Real' + -- Defined in ‛GHC.Real’ ...plus three others In the expression: 1 - In the first argument of `print', namely `[1]' + In the first argument of ‛print’, namely ‛[1]’ In the expression: print [1] diff --git a/testsuite/tests/overloadedlists/should_fail/overloadedlistsfail02.stderr b/testsuite/tests/overloadedlists/should_fail/overloadedlistsfail02.stderr index 49e6b9ee93..62f8a0e0bd 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/overloadedlists/should_fail/overloadedlistsfail02.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/overloadedlists/should_fail/overloadedlistsfail02.stderr @@ -3,11 +3,11 @@ overloadedlistsfail02.hs:6:8: No instance for (GHC.Exts.IsList Foo) arising from an overloaded list In the expression: [7] - In an equation for `test': test = [7] + In an equation for ‛test’: test = [7] overloadedlistsfail02.hs:6:9: No instance for (Num (GHC.Exts.Item Foo)) - arising from the literal `7' + arising from the literal ‛7’ In the expression: 7 In the expression: [7] - In an equation for `test': test = [7] + In an equation for ‛test’: test = [7] diff --git a/testsuite/tests/overloadedlists/should_fail/overloadedlistsfail03.stderr b/testsuite/tests/overloadedlists/should_fail/overloadedlistsfail03.stderr index 099d79f233..cd8cbff032 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/overloadedlists/should_fail/overloadedlistsfail03.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/overloadedlists/should_fail/overloadedlistsfail03.stderr @@ -1,9 +1,6 @@ overloadedlistsfail03.hs:3:27: - Couldn't match expected type `Char' with actual type `[Char]' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Char’ with actual type ‛[Char]’ In the expression: "b" - In the first argument of `length', namely `['a', "b"]' - In the first argument of `print', namely `(length ['a', "b"])' - - - + In the first argument of ‛length’, namely ‛['a', "b"]’ + In the first argument of ‛print’, namely ‛(length ['a', "b"])’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/overloadedlists/should_fail/overloadedlistsfail04.stderr b/testsuite/tests/overloadedlists/should_fail/overloadedlistsfail04.stderr index cfa051997a..145c6cd1fe 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/overloadedlists/should_fail/overloadedlistsfail04.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/overloadedlists/should_fail/overloadedlistsfail04.stderr @@ -1,12 +1,8 @@ overloadedlistsfail04.hs:3:15: No instance for (Enum [Char]) - arising from the arithmetic sequence `"a" .. "b"' - In the first argument of `print', namely - `(["a" .. "b"] :: [String])' + arising from the arithmetic sequence ‛"a" .. "b"’ + In the first argument of ‛print’, namely + ‛(["a" .. "b"] :: [String])’ In the expression: print (["a" .. "b"] :: [String]) - In an equation for `main': main = print (["a" .. "b"] :: [String]) - - - - + In an equation for ‛main’: main = print (["a" .. "b"] :: [String]) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/overloadedlists/should_fail/overloadedlistsfail05.stderr b/testsuite/tests/overloadedlists/should_fail/overloadedlistsfail05.stderr index 6e4d3dbd04..131294b138 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/overloadedlists/should_fail/overloadedlistsfail05.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/overloadedlists/should_fail/overloadedlistsfail05.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ overloadedlistsfail05.hs:3:29: - Couldn't match expected type `Char' with actual type `Int' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Char’ with actual type ‛Int’ In the expression: (10 :: Int) - In the first argument of `length', namely `['a' .. (10 :: Int)]' - In the first argument of `print', namely - `(length ['a' .. (10 :: Int)])' + In the first argument of ‛length’, namely ‛['a' .. (10 :: Int)]’ + In the first argument of ‛print’, namely + ‛(length ['a' .. (10 :: Int)])’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/overloadedlists/should_fail/overloadedlistsfail06.stderr b/testsuite/tests/overloadedlists/should_fail/overloadedlistsfail06.stderr index 2cd0c3fa1a..239465670f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/overloadedlists/should_fail/overloadedlistsfail06.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/overloadedlists/should_fail/overloadedlistsfail06.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,4 @@ -overloadedlistsfail06.hs:3:3: - Not in scope: `toList' - -overloadedlistsfail06.hs:3:8: - Not in scope: `fromListN' +overloadedlistsfail06.hs:3:3: Not in scope: ‛toList’ +overloadedlistsfail06.hs:3:8: Not in scope: ‛fromListN’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_compile/T2245.stderr b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_compile/T2245.stderr index 527957a935..edfa53333b 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_compile/T2245.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_compile/T2245.stderr @@ -1,34 +1,34 @@ -T2245.hs:4:10: - Warning: No explicit method or default declaration for `+' - In the instance declaration for `Num T' +T2245.hs:4:10: Warning: + No explicit method or default declaration for ‛+’ + In the instance declaration for ‛Num T’ -T2245.hs:4:10: - Warning: No explicit method or default declaration for `*' - In the instance declaration for `Num T' +T2245.hs:4:10: Warning: + No explicit method or default declaration for ‛*’ + In the instance declaration for ‛Num T’ -T2245.hs:4:10: - Warning: No explicit method or default declaration for `abs' - In the instance declaration for `Num T' +T2245.hs:4:10: Warning: + No explicit method or default declaration for ‛abs’ + In the instance declaration for ‛Num T’ -T2245.hs:4:10: - Warning: No explicit method or default declaration for `signum' - In the instance declaration for `Num T' +T2245.hs:4:10: Warning: + No explicit method or default declaration for ‛signum’ + In the instance declaration for ‛Num T’ -T2245.hs:4:10: - Warning: No explicit method or default declaration for `fromInteger' - In the instance declaration for `Num T' +T2245.hs:4:10: Warning: + No explicit method or default declaration for ‛fromInteger’ + In the instance declaration for ‛Num T’ -T2245.hs:5:10: - Warning: No explicit method or default declaration for `fromRational' - In the instance declaration for `Fractional T' +T2245.hs:5:10: Warning: + No explicit method or default declaration for ‛fromRational’ + In the instance declaration for ‛Fractional T’ -T2245.hs:7:29: - Warning: Defaulting the following constraint(s) to type `T' - (Fractional b0) - arising from the literal `1e400' at T2245.hs:7:29-33 - (Ord b0) arising from a use of `<' at T2245.hs:7:27 - (Read b0) arising from a use of `read' at T2245.hs:7:38-41 - In the second argument of `(<)', namely `1e400' - In the first argument of `(.)', namely `(< 1e400)' - In the second argument of `(.)', namely `(< 1e400) . read' +T2245.hs:7:29: Warning: + Defaulting the following constraint(s) to type ‛T’ + (Fractional b0) + arising from the literal ‛1e400’ at T2245.hs:7:29-33 + (Ord b0) arising from a use of ‛<’ at T2245.hs:7:27 + (Read b0) arising from a use of ‛read’ at T2245.hs:7:38-41 + In the second argument of ‛(<)’, namely ‛1e400’ + In the first argument of ‛(.)’, namely ‛(< 1e400)’ + In the second argument of ‛(.)’, namely ‛(< 1e400) . read’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_compile/T3303.stderr b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_compile/T3303.stderr index c2ae0c60f9..685448f2cc 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_compile/T3303.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_compile/T3303.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ T3303.hs:7:7: Warning: - In the use of `foo' (imported from T3303A): + In the use of ‛foo’ (imported from T3303A): Deprecated: "This is a multi-line deprecation message for foo" diff --git a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_compile/read014.stderr-ghc b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_compile/read014.stderr-ghc index b1d9b81256..9b49aaf560 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_compile/read014.stderr-ghc +++ b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_compile/read014.stderr-ghc @@ -1,28 +1,28 @@ -read014.hs:4:1: - Warning: Top-level binding with no type signature: - ng1 :: forall t a. Num a => t -> a -> a +read014.hs:4:1: Warning: + Top-level binding with no type signature: + ng1 :: forall t a. Num a => t -> a -> a -read014.hs:4:5: Warning: Defined but not used: `x' +read014.hs:4:5: Warning: Defined but not used: ‛x’ -read014.hs:6:10: - Warning: No explicit method or default declaration for `+' - In the instance declaration for `Num (a, b)' +read014.hs:6:10: Warning: + No explicit method or default declaration for ‛+’ + In the instance declaration for ‛Num (a, b)’ -read014.hs:6:10: - Warning: No explicit method or default declaration for `*' - In the instance declaration for `Num (a, b)' +read014.hs:6:10: Warning: + No explicit method or default declaration for ‛*’ + In the instance declaration for ‛Num (a, b)’ -read014.hs:6:10: - Warning: No explicit method or default declaration for `abs' - In the instance declaration for `Num (a, b)' +read014.hs:6:10: Warning: + No explicit method or default declaration for ‛abs’ + In the instance declaration for ‛Num (a, b)’ -read014.hs:6:10: - Warning: No explicit method or default declaration for `signum' - In the instance declaration for `Num (a, b)' +read014.hs:6:10: Warning: + No explicit method or default declaration for ‛signum’ + In the instance declaration for ‛Num (a, b)’ -read014.hs:6:10: - Warning: No explicit method or default declaration for `fromInteger' - In the instance declaration for `Num (a, b)' +read014.hs:6:10: Warning: + No explicit method or default declaration for ‛fromInteger’ + In the instance declaration for ‛Num (a, b)’ -read014.hs:8:53: Warning: Defined but not used: `x' +read014.hs:8:53: Warning: Defined but not used: ‛x’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/T3811d.stderr b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/T3811d.stderr index 28d08548c1..ddffea00f8 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/T3811d.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/T3811d.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -
-T3811d.hs:6:11:
- Unexpected type `D Char' where type variable expected
- In the declaration of `C b (D Char) b'
+ +T3811d.hs:6:11: + Unexpected type ‛D Char’ where type variable expected + In the declaration of ‛C b (D Char) b’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail001.stderr b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail001.stderr index f146ae5625..aba4ec239d 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail001.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail001.stderr @@ -1,26 +1,26 @@ readFail001.hs:25:11: - The fixity signature for `+#' lacks an accompanying binding + The fixity signature for ‛+#’ lacks an accompanying binding readFail001.hs:38:32: - Not in scope: type constructor or class `Leaf' + Not in scope: type constructor or class ‛Leaf’ A data constructor of that name is in scope; did you mean -XDataKinds? readFail001.hs:38:41: - Not in scope: type constructor or class `Leaf' + Not in scope: type constructor or class ‛Leaf’ A data constructor of that name is in scope; did you mean -XDataKinds? -readFail001.hs:87:11: Not in scope: `x' +readFail001.hs:87:11: Not in scope: ‛x’ -readFail001.hs:88:19: Not in scope: `x' +readFail001.hs:88:19: Not in scope: ‛x’ -readFail001.hs:94:19: Not in scope: `isSpace' +readFail001.hs:94:19: Not in scope: ‛isSpace’ -readFail001.hs:95:13: Not in scope: `foo' +readFail001.hs:95:13: Not in scope: ‛foo’ -readFail001.hs:107:30: Not in scope: data constructor `Foo' +readFail001.hs:107:30: Not in scope: data constructor ‛Foo’ -readFail001.hs:107:42: Not in scope: data constructor `Bar' +readFail001.hs:107:42: Not in scope: data constructor ‛Bar’ readFail001.hs:112:23: - Not in scope: type constructor or class `Foo' + Not in scope: type constructor or class ‛Foo’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail008.stderr b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail008.stderr index a40ce01da0..a2701740b0 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail008.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail008.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ readFail008.hs:5:15: A newtype constructor cannot have a strictness annotation, - but `T' does - In the definition of data constructor `T' - In the newtype declaration for `N' + but ‛T’ does + In the definition of data constructor ‛T’ + In the newtype declaration for ‛N’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail016.stderr b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail016.stderr index 620d8505a2..87f3d2c657 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail016.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail016.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ readFail016.hs:7:1: Precedence parsing error - cannot mix `|-' [infix 6] and `:' [infixr 5] in the same infix expression + cannot mix ‛|-’ [infix 6] and ‛:’ [infixr 5] in the same infix expression diff --git a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail021.stderr b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail021.stderr index a3f5e7b3f0..ed55c0df7f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail021.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail021.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ -readFail021.hs:1:1: The function `main' is not defined in module `Main' +readFail021.hs:1:1: + The function ‛main’ is not defined in module ‛Main’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail023.stderr b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail023.stderr index e1b6ceb83c..c31dc4e993 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail023.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail023.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ readFail023.hs:9:5: - The operator `**' [infixl 7] of a section + The operator ‛**’ [infixl 7] of a section must have lower precedence than that of the operand, namely prefix `-' [infixl 6] - in the section: `- 3 **' + in the section: ‛- 3 **’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail025.stderr b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail025.stderr index 24e83e712a..0d74f86338 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail025.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail025.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -
-readFail025.hs:5:8:
- Unexpected type `String' where type variable expected
- In the declaration of `T String'
+ +readFail025.hs:5:8: + Unexpected type ‛String’ where type variable expected + In the declaration of ‛T String’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail035.stderr b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail035.stderr index f0489b45eb..9e3a64a06c 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail035.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail035.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -
-readFail035.hs:6:1:
- `Foo' has no constructors (-XEmptyDataDecls permits this)
- In the data declaration for `Foo'
+ +readFail035.hs:6:1: + ‛Foo’ has no constructors (-XEmptyDataDecls permits this) + In the data declaration for ‛Foo’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail036.stderr b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail036.stderr index 088f0a9975..9360e6242f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail036.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail036.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ readFail036.hs:4:16: - Illegal kind signature: `*' + Illegal kind signature: ‛*’ Perhaps you intended to use -XKindSignatures - In the data type declaration for `Foo' + In the data type declaration for ‛Foo’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail037.stderr b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail037.stderr index 4c900d66b1..a9c9ff7ad0 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail037.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail037.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ readFail037.hs:4:1: - Too many parameters for class `Foo' + Too many parameters for class ‛Foo’ (Use -XMultiParamTypeClasses to allow multi-parameter classes) - In the class declaration for `Foo' + In the class declaration for ‛Foo’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail039.stderr b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail039.stderr index 1c7cb6b975..d0e27526fc 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail039.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail039.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ -
-readFail039.hs:8:14:
- Can't make a derived instance of `C Foo':
- `C' is not a derivable class
- Try -XGeneralizedNewtypeDeriving for GHC's newtype-deriving extension
- In the newtype declaration for `Foo'
+ +readFail039.hs:8:14: + Can't make a derived instance of ‛C Foo’: + ‛C’ is not a derivable class + Try -XGeneralizedNewtypeDeriving for GHC's newtype-deriving extension + In the newtype declaration for ‛Foo’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail041.stderr b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail041.stderr index fbe49b1153..14903b5b28 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail041.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail041.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ readFail041.hs:6:1: - Fundeps in class `Foo' + Fundeps in class ‛Foo’ (Use -XFunctionalDependencies to allow fundeps) - In the class declaration for `Foo' + In the class declaration for ‛Foo’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail042.stderr b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail042.stderr index 8fbb9bf1f7..9941cb633c 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail042.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail042.stderr @@ -7,6 +7,6 @@ readFail042.hs:11:9: Unexpected transform statement in a list comprehension Use -XTransformListComp -readFail042.hs:11:23: Not in scope: `by' +readFail042.hs:11:23: Not in scope: ‛by’ -readFail042.hs:11:26: Not in scope: `x' +readFail042.hs:11:26: Not in scope: ‛x’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail043.stderr b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail043.stderr index b132bef957..72981ed3f8 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail043.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail043.stderr @@ -3,24 +3,24 @@ readFail043.hs:10:9: Unexpected transform statement in a list comprehension Use -XTransformListComp -readFail043.hs:10:20: Not in scope: `by' +readFail043.hs:10:20: Not in scope: ‛by’ -readFail043.hs:10:23: Not in scope: `x' +readFail043.hs:10:23: Not in scope: ‛x’ -readFail043.hs:10:25: Not in scope: `using' +readFail043.hs:10:25: Not in scope: ‛using’ readFail043.hs:11:9: Unexpected transform statement in a list comprehension Use -XTransformListComp -readFail043.hs:11:20: Not in scope: `by' +readFail043.hs:11:20: Not in scope: ‛by’ -readFail043.hs:11:23: Not in scope: `x' +readFail043.hs:11:23: Not in scope: ‛x’ -readFail043.hs:11:25: Not in scope: `using' +readFail043.hs:11:25: Not in scope: ‛using’ readFail043.hs:12:9: Unexpected transform statement in a list comprehension Use -XTransformListComp -readFail043.hs:12:20: Not in scope: `using' +readFail043.hs:12:20: Not in scope: ‛using’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail046.stderr b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail046.stderr index a303d7798e..072fe530f9 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail046.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/parser/should_fail/readFail046.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ readFail046.hs:1:14: Unsupported extension: ExistientialQuantification - Perhaps you meant `ExistentialQuantification' or `NoExistentialQuantification' + Perhaps you meant ‛ExistentialQuantification’ or ‛NoExistentialQuantification’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/parser/unicode/T2302.stderr b/testsuite/tests/parser/unicode/T2302.stderr index 9718423be2..0557a731db 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/parser/unicode/T2302.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/parser/unicode/T2302.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -T2302.hs:1:5: Not in scope: data constructor `À' +T2302.hs:1:5: Not in scope: data constructor ‛À’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/perf/compiler/parsing001.stderr b/testsuite/tests/perf/compiler/parsing001.stderr index b42ab6cb22..fe5939628c 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/perf/compiler/parsing001.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/perf/compiler/parsing001.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ parsing001.hs:3:1: - Failed to load interface for `Wibble' + Failed to load interface for ‛Wibble’ Use -v to see a list of the files searched for. diff --git a/testsuite/tests/plugins/plugins03.stderr b/testsuite/tests/plugins/plugins03.stderr index f3fbc8e9f2..24feee818b 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/plugins/plugins03.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/plugins/plugins03.stderr @@ -1 +1,2 @@ -<command line>: Could not find module `Simple.NonExistantPlugin' Use -v to see a list of the files searched for. +<command line>: Could not find module ‛Simple.NonExistantPlugin’ +Use -v to see a list of the files searched for. diff --git a/testsuite/tests/plugins/plugins04.stderr b/testsuite/tests/plugins/plugins04.stderr index add1e60d03..13f94e4392 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/plugins/plugins04.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/plugins/plugins04.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ Module imports form a cycle: - module `HomePackagePlugin' (./HomePackagePlugin.hs) imports itself + module ‛HomePackagePlugin’ (./HomePackagePlugin.hs) imports itself diff --git a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/PolyKinds02.stderr b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/PolyKinds02.stderr index 60e00d5c96..8fd49c8158 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/PolyKinds02.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/PolyKinds02.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ PolyKinds02.hs:13:16: - The second argument of `Vec' should have kind `Nat', - but `Nat' has kind `*' - In the type signature for `vec': vec :: Vec Nat Nat + The second argument of ‛Vec’ should have kind ‛Nat’, + but ‛Nat’ has kind ‛*’ + In the type signature for ‛vec’: vec :: Vec Nat Nat diff --git a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/PolyKinds04.stderr b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/PolyKinds04.stderr index 2796b1a898..1ffdf3910b 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/PolyKinds04.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/PolyKinds04.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ PolyKinds04.hs:5:16: - Expecting one more argument to `Maybe' - The first argument of `A' should have kind `*', - but `Maybe' has kind `* -> *' - In the type `A Maybe' - In the definition of data constructor `B1' - In the data declaration for `B' + Expecting one more argument to ‛Maybe’ + The first argument of ‛A’ should have kind ‛*’, + but ‛Maybe’ has kind ‛* -> *’ + In the type ‛A Maybe’ + In the definition of data constructor ‛B1’ + In the data declaration for ‛B’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/PolyKinds06.stderr b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/PolyKinds06.stderr index 0d0baca84a..fc1700f31f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/PolyKinds06.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/PolyKinds06.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -
-PolyKinds06.hs:9:11:
- Type constructor `A' cannot be used here
- (it is defined and used in the same recursive group)
- In the kind `A -> *'
+ +PolyKinds06.hs:9:11: + Type constructor ‛A’ cannot be used here + (it is defined and used in the same recursive group) + In the kind ‛A -> *’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/PolyKinds07.stderr b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/PolyKinds07.stderr index 29930179ca..761f13aeb5 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/PolyKinds07.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/PolyKinds07.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -
-PolyKinds07.hs:10:11:
- Data constructor `A1' cannot be used here
- (it is defined and used in the same recursive group)
- In the type `B A1'
- In the definition of data constructor `B1'
- In the data declaration for `B'
+ +PolyKinds07.hs:10:11: + Data constructor ‛A1’ cannot be used here + (it is defined and used in the same recursive group) + In the type ‛B A1’ + In the definition of data constructor ‛B1’ + In the data declaration for ‛B’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T5716.stderr b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T5716.stderr index 165f32bd7e..f32e604c2c 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T5716.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T5716.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -
-T5716.hs:13:11:
- `U' of kind `*' is not promotable
- In the kind `U -> *'
+ +T5716.hs:13:11: + ‛U’ of kind ‛*’ is not promotable + In the kind ‛U -> *’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T5716a.stderr b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T5716a.stderr index 4b10729cdd..e21d446678 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T5716a.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T5716a.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -
-T5716a.hs:10:27:
- Data constructor `Bar' cannot be used here
- (it comes from a data family instance)
- In the type `Bar a'
- In the definition of data constructor `Bar'
- In the data instance declaration for `DF'
+ +T5716a.hs:10:27: + Data constructor ‛Bar’ cannot be used here + (it comes from a data family instance) + In the type ‛Bar a’ + In the definition of data constructor ‛Bar’ + In the data instance declaration for ‛DF’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T6021.stderr b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T6021.stderr index f164f78ed2..706729113a 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T6021.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T6021.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -
-T6021.hs:5:10:
- Kind variable also used as type variable: `b'
- In an instance declaration
+ +T6021.hs:5:10: + Kind variable also used as type variable: ‛b’ + In an instance declaration diff --git a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T6039.stderr b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T6039.stderr index 7620c3adfb..20b947b861 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T6039.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T6039.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ T6039.hs:5:14: - Kind variable `j' cannot appear in a function position - In the kind `j k' + Kind variable ‛j’ cannot appear in a function position + In the kind ‛j k’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T6054.stderr b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T6054.stderr index bc034d313a..5fb7f6daa0 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T6054.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T6054.stderr @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ T6054.hs:7:14: No instance for (Bar () '() a0) arising from an expression type signature - In the first argument of `print', namely - `(Proxy :: Bar () a => Proxy a)' + In the first argument of ‛print’, namely + ‛(Proxy :: Bar () a => Proxy a)’ In the expression: print (Proxy :: Bar () a => Proxy a) - In an equation for `foo': + In an equation for ‛foo’: foo = print (Proxy :: Bar () a => Proxy a) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T6129.stderr b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T6129.stderr index 10db12ef45..9b8d66f202 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T6129.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T6129.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -
-T6129.hs:12:11:
- Data constructor `DInt' cannot be used here
- (it comes from a data family instance)
- In the type `X DInt'
- In the definition of data constructor `X1'
- In the data declaration for `X'
+ +T6129.hs:12:11: + Data constructor ‛DInt’ cannot be used here + (it comes from a data family instance) + In the type ‛X DInt’ + In the definition of data constructor ‛X1’ + In the data declaration for ‛X’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7053.stderr b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7053.stderr index ab85797890..f5c3efc4f9 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7053.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7053.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ -
-T7053.hs:6:52:
- Kind occurs check
- The first argument of `a' should have kind `k0',
- but `b' has kind `k0 -> k1'
- In the type `TypeRep (a b)'
- In the definition of data constructor `TyApp'
- In the data declaration for `TypeRep'
+ +T7053.hs:6:52: + Kind occurs check + The first argument of ‛a’ should have kind ‛k0’, + but ‛b’ has kind ‛k0 -> k1’ + In the type ‛TypeRep (a b)’ + In the definition of data constructor ‛TyApp’ + In the data declaration for ‛TypeRep’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7151.stderr b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7151.stderr index ed98ddc0dd..bdefa666d3 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7151.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7151.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ T7151.hs:3:12: - Illegal type: '[Int, String] + Illegal type: ‛'[Int, String]’ Perhaps you intended to use -XDataKinds diff --git a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7224.stderr b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7224.stderr index c1508e9b7d..1ae01218aa 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7224.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7224.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ T7224.hs:6:19: - Kind variable `i' used as a type - In the type `a -> m i i a' - In the class declaration for PMonad' + Kind variable ‛i’ used as a type + In the type ‛a -> m i i a’ + In the class declaration for ‛PMonad'’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7230.stderr b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7230.stderr index 3bcccee8f2..34695d0e02 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7230.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7230.stderr @@ -10,13 +10,13 @@ T7230.hs:48:32: bound by a pattern with constructor SCons :: forall (k :: BOX) (x :: k) (xs :: [k]). Sing k x -> Sing [k] xs -> Sing [k] ((':) k x xs), - in an equation for `crash' + in an equation for ‛crash’ at T7230.hs:48:8-27 or from (xs1 ~ (':) Nat x1 xs2) bound by a pattern with constructor SCons :: forall (k :: BOX) (x :: k) (xs :: [k]). Sing k x -> Sing [k] xs -> Sing [k] ((':) k x xs), - in an equation for `crash' + in an equation for ‛crash’ at T7230.hs:48:17-26 Expected type: SBool (Increasing xs) Actual type: SBool (x :<<= x1) @@ -24,5 +24,5 @@ T7230.hs:48:32: x :: Sing Nat x (bound at T7230.hs:48:14) y :: Sing Nat x1 (bound at T7230.hs:48:23) In the expression: x %:<<= y - In an equation for `crash': + In an equation for ‛crash’: crash (SCons x (SCons y xs)) = x %:<<= y diff --git a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7278.stderr b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7278.stderr index 96f8dd7181..a242e5aaf8 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7278.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7278.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ T7278.hs:8:43: - `t' is applied to too many type arguments - In the type signature for `f': + ‛t’ is applied to too many type arguments + In the type signature for ‛f’: f :: C (t :: k) (TF t) => TF t p1 p0 -> t p1 p0 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7328.stderr b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7328.stderr index 6151c5ae42..54508c0773 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7328.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7328.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ T7328.hs:8:34: Kind occurs check - The first argument of `Foo' should have kind `k0', - but `f' has kind `k1 -> k0' - In the type `a ~ f i => Proxy (Foo f)' - In the class declaration for `Foo' + The first argument of ‛Foo’ should have kind ‛k0’, + but ‛f’ has kind ‛k1 -> k0’ + In the type ‛a ~ f i => Proxy (Foo f)’ + In the class declaration for ‛Foo’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7341.stderr b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7341.stderr index da9ae7f707..36ab4eaaf2 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7341.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7341.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ -
-T7341.hs:11:12:
- Expecting one more argument to `[]'
- The first argument of `C' should have kind `*',
- but `[]' has kind `* -> *'
- In the instance declaration for `C []'
+ +T7341.hs:11:12: + Expecting one more argument to ‛[]’ + The first argument of ‛C’ should have kind ‛*’, + but ‛[]’ has kind ‛* -> *’ + In the instance declaration for ‛C []’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7404.stderr b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7404.stderr index 561cc24b02..a228e0c1ba 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7404.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7404.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ T7404.hs:4:1: - Kind variable also used as type variable: `x' - In the declaration for type family `Foo' + Kind variable also used as type variable: ‛x’ + In the declaration for type family ‛Foo’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7433.stderr b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7433.stderr index 8f80b9e679..6cb69630e8 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7433.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7433.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ T7433.hs:2:10: - Data constructor `Z' cannot be used here + Data constructor ‛Z’ cannot be used here (Perhaps you intended to use -XDataKinds) - In the type `Z' - In the type declaration for `T' + In the type ‛Z’ + In the type declaration for ‛T’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7438.stderr b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7438.stderr index 8a1af96fe3..aaa4daf019 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7438.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7438.stderr @@ -1,20 +1,20 @@ T7438.hs:6:14: - Couldn't match expected type `t1' with actual type `t' - `t' is untouchable + Couldn't match expected type ‛t1’ with actual type ‛t’ + ‛t’ is untouchable inside the constraints (t2 ~ t3) bound by a pattern with constructor Nil :: forall (k :: BOX) (a :: k). Thrist k a a, - in an equation for `go' + in an equation for ‛go’ at T7438.hs:6:4-6 - `t' is a rigid type variable bound by + ‛t’ is a rigid type variable bound by the inferred type of go :: Thrist k t2 t3 -> t -> t1 at T7438.hs:6:1 - `t1' is a rigid type variable bound by + ‛t1’ is a rigid type variable bound by the inferred type of go :: Thrist k t2 t3 -> t -> t1 at T7438.hs:6:1 Relevant bindings include go :: Thrist k t2 t3 -> t -> t1 (bound at T7438.hs:6:1) acc :: t (bound at T7438.hs:6:8) In the expression: acc - In an equation for `go': go Nil acc = acc + In an equation for ‛go’: go Nil acc = acc diff --git a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7594.stderr b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7594.stderr index 85a927decd..c813a65e8c 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7594.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/polykinds/T7594.stderr @@ -1,16 +1,16 @@ T7594.hs:25:11: - Couldn't match type `b' with `IO ()' - `b' is untouchable + Couldn't match type ‛b’ with ‛IO ()’ + ‛b’ is untouchable inside the constraints ((:&:) Show Real a) bound by a type expected by the context: (:&:) Show Real a => a -> b at T7594.hs:25:7-17 - `b' is a rigid type variable bound by + ‛b’ is a rigid type variable bound by the inferred type of bar :: b at T7594.hs:25:1 Expected type: a -> b Actual type: a -> IO () Relevant bindings include bar :: b (bound at T7594.hs:25:1) - In the first argument of `app', namely `print' + In the first argument of ‛app’, namely ‛print’ In the expression: app print q - In an equation for `bar': bar = app print q + In an equation for ‛bar’: bar = app print q diff --git a/testsuite/tests/programs/hs-boot/hs-boot.stderr b/testsuite/tests/programs/hs-boot/hs-boot.stderr index 99de1b67f5..b171e1b547 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/programs/hs-boot/hs-boot.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/programs/hs-boot/hs-boot.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -B.hs:5:23: Warning: {-# SOURCE #-} unnecessary in import of `A' +B.hs:5:23: Warning: {-# SOURCE #-} unnecessary in import of ‛A’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/quasiquotation/T3953.stderr b/testsuite/tests/quasiquotation/T3953.stderr index da6f2dcebf..bd2b0fed56 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/quasiquotation/T3953.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/quasiquotation/T3953.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -T3953.hs:5:7: Not in scope: `notDefinedHere' +T3953.hs:5:7: Not in scope: ‛notDefinedHere’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rebindable/rebindable6.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rebindable/rebindable6.stderr index a12cef09f2..e36e38d056 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rebindable/rebindable6.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rebindable/rebindable6.stderr @@ -1,67 +1,67 @@ -
-rebindable6.hs:106:17:
- No instance for (HasSeq (IO a -> t0 -> IO b))
- arising from a do statement
- The type variable `t0' is ambiguous
- Relevant bindings include
- test_do :: IO a -> IO (Maybe b) -> IO b
- (bound at rebindable6.hs:104:9)
- f :: IO a (bound at rebindable6.hs:104:17)
- g :: IO (Maybe b) (bound at rebindable6.hs:104:19)
- Note: there is a potential instance available:
- instance HasSeq (IO a -> IO b -> IO b)
- -- Defined at rebindable6.hs:52:18
- In a stmt of a 'do' block: f
- In the expression:
- do { f;
- Just (b :: b) <- g;
- return b }
- In an equation for `test_do':
- test_do f g
- = do { f;
- Just (b :: b) <- g;
- return b }
-
-rebindable6.hs:107:17:
- No instance for (HasBind (IO (Maybe b) -> (Maybe b -> t1) -> t0))
- arising from a do statement
- The type variables `t0', `t1' are ambiguous
- Relevant bindings include
- test_do :: IO a -> IO (Maybe b) -> IO b
- (bound at rebindable6.hs:104:9)
- g :: IO (Maybe b) (bound at rebindable6.hs:104:19)
- Note: there is a potential instance available:
- instance HasBind (IO a -> (a -> IO b) -> IO b)
- -- Defined at rebindable6.hs:47:18
- In a stmt of a 'do' block: Just (b :: b) <- g
- In the expression:
- do { f;
- Just (b :: b) <- g;
- return b }
- In an equation for `test_do':
- test_do f g
- = do { f;
- Just (b :: b) <- g;
- return b }
-
-rebindable6.hs:108:17:
- No instance for (HasReturn (b -> t1))
- arising from a use of `return'
- The type variable `t1' is ambiguous
- Relevant bindings include
- test_do :: IO a -> IO (Maybe b) -> IO b
- (bound at rebindable6.hs:104:9)
- g :: IO (Maybe b) (bound at rebindable6.hs:104:19)
- b :: b (bound at rebindable6.hs:107:23)
- Note: there is a potential instance available:
- instance HasReturn (a -> IO a) -- Defined at rebindable6.hs:42:18
- In a stmt of a 'do' block: return b
- In the expression:
- do { f;
- Just (b :: b) <- g;
- return b }
- In an equation for `test_do':
- test_do f g
- = do { f;
- Just (b :: b) <- g;
- return b }
+ +rebindable6.hs:106:17: + No instance for (HasSeq (IO a -> t0 -> IO b)) + arising from a do statement + The type variable ‛t0’ is ambiguous + Relevant bindings include + test_do :: IO a -> IO (Maybe b) -> IO b + (bound at rebindable6.hs:104:9) + f :: IO a (bound at rebindable6.hs:104:17) + g :: IO (Maybe b) (bound at rebindable6.hs:104:19) + Note: there is a potential instance available: + instance HasSeq (IO a -> IO b -> IO b) + -- Defined at rebindable6.hs:52:18 + In a stmt of a 'do' block: f + In the expression: + do { f; + Just (b :: b) <- g; + return b } + In an equation for ‛test_do’: + test_do f g + = do { f; + Just (b :: b) <- g; + return b } + +rebindable6.hs:107:17: + No instance for (HasBind (IO (Maybe b) -> (Maybe b -> t1) -> t0)) + arising from a do statement + The type variables ‛t0’, ‛t1’ are ambiguous + Relevant bindings include + test_do :: IO a -> IO (Maybe b) -> IO b + (bound at rebindable6.hs:104:9) + g :: IO (Maybe b) (bound at rebindable6.hs:104:19) + Note: there is a potential instance available: + instance HasBind (IO a -> (a -> IO b) -> IO b) + -- Defined at rebindable6.hs:47:18 + In a stmt of a 'do' block: Just (b :: b) <- g + In the expression: + do { f; + Just (b :: b) <- g; + return b } + In an equation for ‛test_do’: + test_do f g + = do { f; + Just (b :: b) <- g; + return b } + +rebindable6.hs:108:17: + No instance for (HasReturn (b -> t1)) + arising from a use of ‛return’ + The type variable ‛t1’ is ambiguous + Relevant bindings include + test_do :: IO a -> IO (Maybe b) -> IO b + (bound at rebindable6.hs:104:9) + g :: IO (Maybe b) (bound at rebindable6.hs:104:19) + b :: b (bound at rebindable6.hs:107:23) + Note: there is a potential instance available: + instance HasReturn (a -> IO a) -- Defined at rebindable6.hs:42:18 + In a stmt of a 'do' block: return b + In the expression: + do { f; + Just (b :: b) <- g; + return b } + In an equation for ‛test_do’: + test_do f g + = do { f; + Just (b :: b) <- g; + return b } diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/prog002/rename.prog002.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/prog002/rename.prog002.stderr index 31b672b539..3d488acb5a 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/prog002/rename.prog002.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/prog002/rename.prog002.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -rnfail037.hs:8:7: Not in scope: data constructor `Rn037Help.C' +rnfail037.hs:8:7: Not in scope: data constructor ‛Rn037Help.C’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/prog003/rename.prog003.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/prog003/rename.prog003.stderr index 49c264cae8..42cc924bea 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/prog003/rename.prog003.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/prog003/rename.prog003.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -B.hs:4:6: Not in scope: type constructor or class `Class' +B.hs:4:6: Not in scope: type constructor or class ‛Class’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T1789.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T1789.stderr index dc9a794935..3fd1f1a037 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T1789.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T1789.stderr @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ -T1789.hs:6:1: - Warning: The module `Prelude' does not have an explicit import list +T1789.hs:6:1: Warning: + The module ‛Prelude’ does not have an explicit import list -T1789.hs:7:1: - Warning: The module `Data.Map' does not have an explicit import list +T1789.hs:7:1: Warning: + The module ‛Data.Map’ does not have an explicit import list -T1789.hs:9:1: - Warning: The import item `Maybe(..)' does not have an explicit import list +T1789.hs:9:1: Warning: + The import item ‛Maybe(..)’ does not have an explicit import list -T1789.hs:10:1: - Warning: The module `Data.Maybe' does not have an explicit import list +T1789.hs:10:1: Warning: + The module ‛Data.Maybe’ does not have an explicit import list diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T1972.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T1972.stderr index 610e509402..1cb78fbc29 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T1972.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T1972.stderr @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ -T1972.hs:12:3: - Warning: This binding for `name' shadows the existing binding - defined at T1972.hs:9:19 +T1972.hs:12:3: Warning: + This binding for ‛name’ shadows the existing binding + defined at T1972.hs:9:19 -T1972.hs:14:3: - Warning: This binding for `mapAccumL' shadows the existing bindings - defined at T1972.hs:16:1 - imported from `Data.List' at T1972.hs:7:1-16 +T1972.hs:14:3: Warning: + This binding for ‛mapAccumL’ shadows the existing bindings + defined at T1972.hs:16:1 + imported from ‛Data.List’ at T1972.hs:7:1-16 -T1972.hs:20:10: Warning: Defined but not used: `c' +T1972.hs:20:10: Warning: Defined but not used: ‛c’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T3262.stderr-ghc b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T3262.stderr-ghc index 4e730efa8d..b3250fd5a3 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T3262.stderr-ghc +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T3262.stderr-ghc @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ -T3262.hs:12:11: - Warning: This binding for `not_ignored' shadows the existing binding - bound at T3262.hs:11:11 +T3262.hs:12:11: Warning: + This binding for ‛not_ignored’ shadows the existing binding + bound at T3262.hs:11:11 -T3262.hs:20:15: - Warning: This binding for `not_ignored' shadows the existing binding - bound at T3262.hs:19:15 +T3262.hs:20:15: Warning: + This binding for ‛not_ignored’ shadows the existing binding + bound at T3262.hs:19:15 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T3371.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T3371.stderr index b354d9d3d6..944739e45a 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T3371.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T3371.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -T3371.hs:10:14: Warning: Defined but not used: `a' +T3371.hs:10:14: Warning: Defined but not used: ‛a’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T3449.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T3449.stderr index da36d24465..32ddc6f35d 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T3449.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T3449.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -T3449.hs-boot:8:1: Warning: Defined but not used: `unused' +T3449.hs-boot:8:1: Warning: Defined but not used: ‛unused’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T3823.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T3823.stderr index 0eb8234554..90e3c864ed 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T3823.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T3823.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ T3823B.hs:8:7: - Couldn't match expected type `A' with actual type `Bool' - In the first argument of `y', namely `a' + Couldn't match expected type ‛A’ with actual type ‛Bool’ + In the first argument of ‛y’, namely ‛a’ In the expression: y a - In an equation for `b': b = y a + In an equation for ‛b’: b = y a diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T4489.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T4489.stderr index 8cd400a720..5fd076ee42 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T4489.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T4489.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ -
-T4489.hs:4:1:
- Warning: The module `Data.Maybe' does not have an explicit import list
-
-T4489.hs:5:1:
- Warning: The import item `Maybe(..)' does not have an explicit import list
+ +T4489.hs:4:1: Warning: + The module ‛Data.Maybe’ does not have an explicit import list + +T4489.hs:5:1: Warning: + The import item ‛Maybe(..)’ does not have an explicit import list diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T5331.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T5331.stderr index e18c657e3f..e78dd64daf 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T5331.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T5331.stderr @@ -1,13 +1,13 @@ -
-T5331.hs:8:17:
- Warning: Unused quantified type variable `a'
- In the definition of data constructor `S1'
-
-T5331.hs:11:16:
- Warning: Unused quantified type variable `a'
- In the definition of data constructor `W1'
-
-T5331.hs:13:13:
- Warning: Unused quantified type variable `a'
- In the type `forall a. Int'
- In the type signature for `f'
+ +T5331.hs:8:17: Warning: + Unused quantified type variable ‛a’ + In the definition of data constructor ‛S1’ + +T5331.hs:11:16: Warning: + Unused quantified type variable ‛a’ + In the definition of data constructor ‛W1’ + +T5331.hs:13:13: Warning: + Unused quantified type variable ‛a’ + In the type ‛forall a. Int’ + In the type signature for ‛f’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T5334.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T5334.stderr index de906b9dd6..2985386338 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T5334.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T5334.stderr @@ -1,13 +1,13 @@ -T5334.hs:7:5: - Warning: Fields of `T' not initialised: b +T5334.hs:7:5: Warning: + Fields of ‛T’ not initialised: b In the expression: T {..} - In an equation for `t': + In an equation for ‛t’: t = T {..} where a = 1 -T5334.hs:14:5: - Warning: Fields of `S' not initialised: y +T5334.hs:14:5: Warning: + Fields of ‛S’ not initialised: y In the expression: S {x = 1} - In an equation for `s': s = S {x = 1} + In an equation for ‛s’: s = S {x = 1} diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T5867.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T5867.stderr index 35941c8417..0ada9be52c 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T5867.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T5867.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ T5867.hs:4:7: Warning: - In the use of `f' (imported from T5867a): + In the use of ‛f’ (imported from T5867a): Deprecated: "Don't use f!" T5867.hs:5:7: Warning: - In the use of `f' (imported from T5867a): + In the use of ‛f’ (imported from T5867a): Deprecated: "Don't use f!" diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T7145b.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T7145b.stderr index 35e233d9cc..f24d02954b 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T7145b.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T7145b.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -T7145b.hs:6:1: Warning: Defined but not used: `pure' +T7145b.hs:6:1: Warning: Defined but not used: ‛pure’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T7167.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T7167.stderr index 0607529f10..cddbbfe74d 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T7167.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T7167.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -T7167.hs:5:1: Warning: Module `Data.List' does not export `foo' +T7167.hs:5:1: Warning: Module ‛Data.List’ does not export ‛foo’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T7336.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T7336.stderr index bd51e730b2..0610b13e21 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T7336.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/T7336.stderr @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ -
-T7336.hs:3:10: Warning:
- Defined but not used: data constructor `MkU'
+ +T7336.hs:3:10: Warning: + Defined but not used: data constructor ‛MkU’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/mc10.stderr-ghc b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/mc10.stderr-ghc index 585bfa4528..56a21b8700 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/mc10.stderr-ghc +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/mc10.stderr-ghc @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -mc10.hs:14:11: Warning: Defined but not used: `y' +mc10.hs:14:11: Warning: Defined but not used: ‛y’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn037.stderr-ghc b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn037.stderr-ghc index 64b604f9bd..ad171a4263 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn037.stderr-ghc +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn037.stderr-ghc @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -rn037.hs:3:1: - Warning: The import of `Data.List' is redundant - except perhaps to import instances from `Data.List' - To import instances alone, use: import Data.List() +rn037.hs:3:1: Warning: + The import of ‛Data.List’ is redundant + except perhaps to import instances from ‛Data.List’ + To import instances alone, use: import Data.List() diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn039.stderr-ghc b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn039.stderr-ghc index 51adb6fa8b..2b87c367e3 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn039.stderr-ghc +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn039.stderr-ghc @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -rn039.hs:6:16: - Warning: This binding for `-' shadows the existing binding - imported from `Prelude' at rn039.hs:2:8-20 - (and originally defined in `GHC.Num') +rn039.hs:6:16: Warning: + This binding for ‛-’ shadows the existing binding + imported from ‛Prelude’ at rn039.hs:2:8-20 + (and originally defined in ‛GHC.Num’) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn040.stderr-ghc b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn040.stderr-ghc index 5de9d0c1c6..f5802287b8 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn040.stderr-ghc +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn040.stderr-ghc @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -rn040.hs:6:12: Warning: Defined but not used: `y' +rn040.hs:6:12: Warning: Defined but not used: ‛y’ -rn040.hs:8:8: Warning: Defined but not used: `w' +rn040.hs:8:8: Warning: Defined but not used: ‛w’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn041.stderr-ghc b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn041.stderr-ghc index da94a09854..fbf27899ad 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn041.stderr-ghc +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn041.stderr-ghc @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ -rn041.hs:7:1: Warning: Defined but not used: `f' +rn041.hs:7:1: Warning: Defined but not used: ‛f’ -rn041.hs:9:1: Warning: Defined but not used: `g' +rn041.hs:9:1: Warning: Defined but not used: ‛g’ -rn041.hs:10:1: Warning: Defined but not used: `h' +rn041.hs:10:1: Warning: Defined but not used: ‛h’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn046.stderr-ghc b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn046.stderr-ghc index ebde8af373..4335376137 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn046.stderr-ghc +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn046.stderr-ghc @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ -rn046.hs:2:1: - Warning: The import of `Data.List' is redundant - except perhaps to import instances from `Data.List' - To import instances alone, use: import Data.List() +rn046.hs:2:1: Warning: + The import of ‛Data.List’ is redundant + except perhaps to import instances from ‛Data.List’ + To import instances alone, use: import Data.List() -rn046.hs:3:1: - Warning: The import of `ord' from module `Data.Char' is redundant +rn046.hs:3:1: Warning: + The import of ‛ord’ from module ‛Data.Char’ is redundant diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn047.stderr-ghc b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn047.stderr-ghc index 8b9614cb17..588237d267 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn047.stderr-ghc +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn047.stderr-ghc @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -rn047.hs:12:11: Warning: Defined but not used: `y' +rn047.hs:12:11: Warning: Defined but not used: ‛y’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn050.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn050.stderr index 4eb19d696e..2554787a45 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn050.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn050.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ rn050.hs:13:7: Warning: - In the use of `op' (imported from Rn050_A): + In the use of ‛op’ (imported from Rn050_A): Deprecated: "Use bop instead" rn050.hs:13:10: Warning: - In the use of data constructor `C' (imported from Rn050_A): + In the use of data constructor ‛C’ (imported from Rn050_A): Deprecated: "Use D instead" diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn063.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn063.stderr index c437dd3c6a..635ef98bd9 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn063.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn063.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -rn063.hs:10:9: Warning: Defined but not used: `x' +rn063.hs:10:9: Warning: Defined but not used: ‛x’ -rn063.hs:13:9: Warning: Defined but not used: `y' +rn063.hs:13:9: Warning: Defined but not used: ‛y’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn064.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn064.stderr index f23a96bb54..6ca77eaf25 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn064.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn064.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -rn064.hs:13:12: - Warning: This binding for `r' shadows the existing binding - bound at rn064.hs:15:9 +rn064.hs:13:12: Warning: + This binding for ‛r’ shadows the existing binding + bound at rn064.hs:15:9 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn066.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn066.stderr index 3d38aa9f2f..52e82e9e7a 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn066.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_compile/rn066.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ rn066.hs:13:7: Warning: - In the use of `op' (imported from Rn066_A): + In the use of ‛op’ (imported from Rn066_A): "Is that really a good idea?" rn066.hs:13:10: Warning: - In the use of data constructor `C' (imported from Rn066_A): + In the use of data constructor ‛C’ (imported from Rn066_A): "Are you sure you want to do that?" diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T1595a.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T1595a.stderr index 3c9adca7f7..f7dd8113f0 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T1595a.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T1595a.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -T1595a.hs:3:20: Not in scope: type constructor or class `Tpyo' +T1595a.hs:3:20: Not in scope: type constructor or class ‛Tpyo’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T2310.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T2310.stderr index 6500eef1fc..a5dd532a0c 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T2310.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T2310.stderr @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ T2310.hs:5:22: - Illegal result type signature `a' + Illegal result type signature ‛a’ Result signatures are no longer supported in pattern matches In a lambda abstraction: \ x :: a -> (x :: a) T2310.hs:5:39: - Not in scope: `co' + Not in scope: ‛co’ Perhaps you meant one of these: - `c' (line 5), `cos' (imported from Prelude) + ‛c’ (line 5), ‛cos’ (imported from Prelude) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T2723.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T2723.stderr index 7ede041658..b348161453 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T2723.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T2723.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -T2723.hs:15:5: - Warning: This binding for `field3' shadows the existing binding - defined at T2723.hs:7:1 +T2723.hs:15:5: Warning: + This binding for ‛field3’ shadows the existing binding + defined at T2723.hs:7:1 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T2901.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T2901.stderr index 8cf5b2f2b1..fedaee6329 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T2901.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T2901.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -T2901.hs:6:5: Not in scope: data constructor `F.Foo' +T2901.hs:6:5: Not in scope: data constructor ‛F.Foo’ -T2901.hs:6:13: `F.field' is not a (visible) constructor field name +T2901.hs:6:13: ‛F.field’ is not a (visible) constructor field name diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T2993.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T2993.stderr index 0ba55ddd36..ec6fa1ea2a 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T2993.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T2993.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -T2993.hs:7:13: Not in scope: `<$>' +T2993.hs:7:13: Not in scope: ‛<$>’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T3265.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T3265.stderr index 37642ff16b..0a56f4c5d0 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T3265.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T3265.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ T3265.hs:7:8: - Illegal declaration of a type or class operator `:+:' + Illegal declaration of a type or class operator ‛:+:’ Use -XTypeOperators to declare operators in type and declarations T3265.hs:9:9: - Illegal declaration of a type or class operator `:*:' + Illegal declaration of a type or class operator ‛:*:’ Use -XTypeOperators to declare operators in type and declarations diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5211.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5211.stderr index b99cc04d97..8dcc5b68bd 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5211.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5211.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ T5211.hs:5:1: Warning: - The qualified import of `Foreign.Storable' is redundant - except perhaps to import instances from `Foreign.Storable' + The qualified import of ‛Foreign.Storable’ is redundant + except perhaps to import instances from ‛Foreign.Storable’ To import instances alone, use: import Foreign.Storable() diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5281.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5281.stderr index 3fa7670bb6..99ad47b584 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5281.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5281.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ T5281.hs:6:5: Warning: - In the use of `deprec' (imported from T5281A): + In the use of ‛deprec’ (imported from T5281A): Deprecated: "This is deprecated" diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5372.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5372.stderr index 47e50dc672..6677875083 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5372.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5372.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ T5372.hs:4:11: - Not in scope: data constructor `MkS' - Perhaps you meant `T5372a.MkS' (imported from T5372a) + Not in scope: data constructor ‛MkS’ + Perhaps you meant ‛T5372a.MkS’ (imported from T5372a) -T5372.hs:4:17: `x' is not a (visible) constructor field name +T5372.hs:4:17: ‛x’ is not a (visible) constructor field name diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5385.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5385.stderr index c3ba1d5e67..2c87a0a47a 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5385.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5385.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ T5385.hs:3:16: - In module `T5385a': - `(:::)' is a data constructor of `T' + In module ‛T5385a’: + ‛(:::)’ is a data constructor of ‛T’ To import it use - `import' T5385a( T( (:::) ) ) + ‛import’ T5385a( T( (:::) ) ) or - `import' T5385a( T(..) ) + ‛import’ T5385a( T(..) ) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5533.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5533.stderr index b46285132f..ce13e14e2e 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5533.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5533.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ T5533.hs:4:1: - The type signature for `f2' lacks an accompanying binding + The type signature for ‛f2’ lacks an accompanying binding (You cannot give a type signature for a record selector or class method) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5589.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5589.stderr index 5eaae6436b..cf0c0a9a12 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5589.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5589.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -
-T5589.hs:4:1:
- Duplicate type signatures for `aaa'
- at T5589.hs:3:6-8
- T5589.hs:4:1-3
+ +T5589.hs:4:1: + Duplicate type signatures for ‛aaa’ + at T5589.hs:3:6-8 + T5589.hs:4:1-3 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5657.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5657.stderr index af6f57e11a..17a223d41c 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5657.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5657.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -T5657.hs:3:8: Not in scope: `LT..' +T5657.hs:3:8: Not in scope: ‛LT..’ T5657.hs:3:8: A section must be enclosed in parentheses thus: (LT.. GT) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5745.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5745.stderr index 44994c9187..b71e1e2057 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5745.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5745.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -T5745.hs:5:6: Not in scope: type constructor or class `T' +T5745.hs:5:6: Not in scope: type constructor or class ‛T’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5892a.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5892a.stderr index 1047599b83..a378dc3919 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5892a.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5892a.stderr @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ T5892a.hs:12:8: Warning: - Fields of `Version' not initialised: Data.Version.versionTags + Fields of ‛Version’ not initialised: Data.Version.versionTags In the expression: Version {..} In the expression: let versionBranch = [] in Version {..} - In an equation for `foo': + In an equation for ‛foo’: foo (Version {..}) = let versionBranch = ... in Version {..} <no location info>: diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5892b.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5892b.stderr index 10d6c3692b..10d1fd139e 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5892b.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T5892b.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -
-T5892b.hs:11:7:
- Not in scope: `T5892b.versionTags'
- Perhaps you meant `T5892b.versionBranch' (line 7)
+ +T5892b.hs:11:7: + Not in scope: ‛T5892b.versionTags’ + Perhaps you meant ‛T5892b.versionBranch’ (line 7) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T7164.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T7164.stderr index a7c23e136e..5e27fb876d 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T7164.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T7164.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ T7164.hs:8:1: - Multiple declarations of `derp' + Multiple declarations of ‛derp’ Declared at: T7164.hs:5:5 T7164.hs:8:1 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T7338.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T7338.stderr index e2a92d3df9..b1e6e5c803 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T7338.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T7338.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ T7338.hs:4:1: - Duplicate type signatures for `a' + Duplicate type signatures for ‛a’ at T7338.hs:3:1 T7338.hs:3:4 T7338.hs:4:1 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T7338a.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T7338a.stderr index 58807dc3b0..b4b00a3590 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T7338a.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T7338a.stderr @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ T7338a.hs:7:4: - Duplicate type signatures for `a' + Duplicate type signatures for ‛a’ at T7338a.hs:3:1 T7338a.hs:7:4 T7338a.hs:10:1: - Duplicate type signatures for `c' + Duplicate type signatures for ‛c’ at T7338a.hs:7:1 T7338a.hs:10:1 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T7454.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T7454.stderr index 4f68ca4b90..a8d11886e4 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T7454.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/T7454.stderr @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ T7454.hs:5:1: Warning: - The import of `Arrow' from module `Control.Arrow' is redundant + The import of ‛Arrow’ from module ‛Control.Arrow’ is redundant diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/mc13.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/mc13.stderr index 82f8dd5f18..3cf06955a4 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/mc13.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/mc13.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -mc13.hs:12:37: Not in scope: `f' +mc13.hs:12:37: Not in scope: ‛f’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/mc14.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/mc14.stderr index 1eadb9d4b7..28d2ca2241 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/mc14.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/mc14.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -mc14.hs:14:49: Not in scope: `f' +mc14.hs:14:49: Not in scope: ‛f’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rn_dup.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rn_dup.stderr index e7859ea82c..223985f763 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rn_dup.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rn_dup.stderr @@ -1,22 +1,22 @@ rn_dup.hs:9:10: - Multiple declarations of `MkT' + Multiple declarations of ‛MkT’ Declared at: rn_dup.hs:7:10 rn_dup.hs:7:16 rn_dup.hs:9:10 rn_dup.hs:12:16: - Multiple declarations of `rf' + Multiple declarations of ‛rf’ Declared at: rn_dup.hs:11:16 rn_dup.hs:11:27 rn_dup.hs:12:16 rn_dup.hs:17:8: - Multiple declarations of `CT' + Multiple declarations of ‛CT’ Declared at: rn_dup.hs:15:8 rn_dup.hs:17:8 rn_dup.hs:18:3: - Multiple declarations of `f' + Multiple declarations of ‛f’ Declared at: rn_dup.hs:16:3 rn_dup.hs:18:3 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail001.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail001.stderr index 5414f93f27..d8baefcb42 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail001.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail001.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ rnfail001.hs:3:3: - Conflicting definitions for `x' + Conflicting definitions for ‛x’ Bound at: rnfail001.hs:3:3 rnfail001.hs:3:5 - In an equation for `f' + In an equation for ‛f’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail002.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail002.stderr index 6f73137748..6c15ef103d 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail002.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail002.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ rnfail002.hs:6:1: - Multiple declarations of `y' + Multiple declarations of ‛y’ Declared at: rnfail002.hs:5:1 rnfail002.hs:6:1 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail003.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail003.stderr index aab5911412..0482332626 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail003.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail003.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ rnfail003.hs:4:1: - Multiple declarations of `f' + Multiple declarations of ‛f’ Declared at: rnfail003.hs:2:1 rnfail003.hs:4:1 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail004.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail004.stderr index edff58cf6f..23e22fe28f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail004.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail004.stderr @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ rnfail004.hs:6:5: - Conflicting definitions for `a' + Conflicting definitions for ‛a’ Bound at: rnfail004.hs:6:5 rnfail004.hs:7:10 rnfail004.hs:7:6: - Conflicting definitions for `b' + Conflicting definitions for ‛b’ Bound at: rnfail004.hs:7:6 rnfail004.hs:8:8 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail007.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail007.stderr index a00dc892d5..316e141bd1 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail007.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail007.stderr @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ rnfail007.hs:1:1: - The function `main' is not defined in module `Main' + The function ‛main’ is not defined in module ‛Main’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail008.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail008.stderr index 91818fc656..f565d87990 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail008.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail008.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -rnfail008.hs:18:9: `op3' is not a (visible) method of class `K' +rnfail008.hs:18:9: ‛op3’ is not a (visible) method of class ‛K’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail009.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail009.stderr index 358c17afe0..9f5e98ecb1 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail009.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail009.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ rnfail009.hs:5:10: - Multiple declarations of `A' + Multiple declarations of ‛A’ Declared at: rnfail009.hs:3:10 rnfail009.hs:5:10 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail010.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail010.stderr index d0e7c835ac..d2f7a9385b 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail010.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail010.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ rnfail010.hs:6:1: - Multiple declarations of `f' + Multiple declarations of ‛f’ Declared at: rnfail010.hs:2:1 rnfail010.hs:6:1 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail011.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail011.stderr index 7e7d02abf0..544455a08a 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail011.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail011.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ rnfail011.hs:6:6: - Multiple declarations of `A' + Multiple declarations of ‛A’ Declared at: rnfail011.hs:2:6 rnfail011.hs:6:6 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail012.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail012.stderr index 82dbd3a76f..83b1e1d2fb 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail012.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail012.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ rnfail012.hs:8:7: - Multiple declarations of `A' + Multiple declarations of ‛A’ Declared at: rnfail012.hs:2:7 rnfail012.hs:8:7 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail013.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail013.stderr index 3ec4f43cb0..eebfaa2e02 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail013.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail013.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ rnfail013.hs:7:11: - Multiple declarations of `MkT' + Multiple declarations of ‛MkT’ Declared at: rnfail013.hs:5:11 rnfail013.hs:7:11 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail015.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail015.stderr index dcb54f5b9e..999a7acabf 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail015.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail015.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ rnfail015.hs:14:9: - Multiple declarations of `TokLiteral' + Multiple declarations of ‛TokLiteral’ Declared at: rnfail015.hs:8:9 rnfail015.hs:14:9 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail017.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail017.stderr index f04b1d0990..a89b6be1c0 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail017.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail017.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ rnfail017.hs:5:10: Precedence parsing error - cannot mix `+' [infixl 6] and prefix `-' [infixl 6] in the same infix expression + cannot mix ‛+’ [infixl 6] and prefix `-' [infixl 6] in the same infix expression rnfail017.hs:6:10: Precedence parsing error - cannot mix `*' [infixl 7] and prefix `-' [infixl 6] in the same infix expression + cannot mix ‛*’ [infixl 7] and prefix `-' [infixl 6] in the same infix expression diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail018.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail018.stderr index 3bae3eb527..7658b18baa 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail018.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail018.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ -rnfail018.hs:12:37: Not in scope: type variable `a' +rnfail018.hs:12:37: Not in scope: type variable ‛a’ -rnfail018.hs:12:42: Not in scope: type variable `m' +rnfail018.hs:12:42: Not in scope: type variable ‛m’ -rnfail018.hs:12:47: Not in scope: type variable `m' +rnfail018.hs:12:47: Not in scope: type variable ‛m’ -rnfail018.hs:12:49: Not in scope: type variable `a' +rnfail018.hs:12:49: Not in scope: type variable ‛a’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail019.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail019.stderr index f990e2d2cd..449da500e1 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail019.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail019.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ rnfail019.hs:5:9: - The operator `:' [infixr 5] of a section + The operator ‛:’ [infixr 5] of a section must have lower precedence than that of the operand, - namely `:' [infixr 5] - in the section: `x : y :' + namely ‛:’ [infixr 5] + in the section: ‛x : y :’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail022.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail022.stderr index 011d6790d7..d443cec996 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail022.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail022.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ rnfail022.hs:8:5: - Not in scope: `intersperse' - Perhaps you meant `L.intersperse' (imported from Data.List) + Not in scope: ‛intersperse’ + Perhaps you meant ‛L.intersperse’ (imported from Data.List) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail023.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail023.stderr index ec9d81ab76..7fa68c3f19 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail023.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail023.stderr @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ rnfail023.hs:7:1: - The type signature for `f' lacks an accompanying binding + The type signature for ‛f’ lacks an accompanying binding rnfail023.hs:8:12: - The INLINE pragma for `f' lacks an accompanying binding + The INLINE pragma for ‛f’ lacks an accompanying binding rnfail023.hs:14:7: - The type signature for `g' lacks an accompanying binding + The type signature for ‛g’ lacks an accompanying binding diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail024.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail024.stderr index 19b9f33921..f3e6cbe615 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail024.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail024.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ rnfail024.hs:3:1: - The type signature for `sig_without_a_defn' + The type signature for ‛sig_without_a_defn’ lacks an accompanying binding -rnfail024.hs:6:5: Not in scope: `sig_without_a_defn' +rnfail024.hs:6:5: Not in scope: ‛sig_without_a_defn’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail025.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail025.stderr index 4c2e25a07c..bdb07ad5cf 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail025.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail025.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ rnfail025.hs:3:1: - The type signature for `sig_without_a_defn' + The type signature for ‛sig_without_a_defn’ lacks an accompanying binding diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail026.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail026.stderr index 3a4ae49224..f082327d56 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail026.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail026.stderr @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ rnfail026.hs:16:35: - The first argument of `Monad' should have kind `* -> *', - but `Set a' has kind `*' - In the instance declaration for `Monad (forall a. Eq a => Set a)' + The first argument of ‛Monad’ should have kind ‛* -> *’, + but ‛Set a’ has kind ‛*’ + In the instance declaration for ‛Monad (forall a. Eq a => Set a)’ rnfail026.hs:19:10: Illegal polymorphic or qualified type: forall a. [a] - In the instance declaration for `Eq (forall a. [a])' + In the instance declaration for ‛Eq (forall a. [a])’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail027.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail027.stderr index 31214a1a42..062600ac8d 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail027.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail027.stderr @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ rnfail027.hs:5:10: - The fixity signature for `wibble' lacks an accompanying binding + The fixity signature for ‛wibble’ lacks an accompanying binding diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail029.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail029.stderr index 360a9aac9e..671b035c46 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail029.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail029.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ rnfail029.hs:2:36: - Conflicting exports for `map': - `Data.List.map' exports `Data.List.map' - imported qualified from `Data.List' at rnfail029.hs:3:1-26 - (and originally defined in `GHC.Base') - `module ShouldFail' exports `ShouldFail.map' + Conflicting exports for ‛map’: + ‛Data.List.map’ exports ‛Data.List.map’ + imported qualified from ‛Data.List’ at rnfail029.hs:3:1-26 + (and originally defined in ‛GHC.Base’) + ‛module ShouldFail’ exports ‛ShouldFail.map’ defined at rnfail029.hs:4:1 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail030.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail030.stderr index 749206a814..cbac79dc42 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail030.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail030.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -rnfail030.hs:2:21: Not in scope: `Data.List.map' +rnfail030.hs:2:21: Not in scope: ‛Data.List.map’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail031.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail031.stderr index ad04461dc3..eee31a2ec8 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail031.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail031.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -rnfail031.hs:2:21: Not in scope: `Data.List.map' +rnfail031.hs:2:21: Not in scope: ‛Data.List.map’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail032.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail032.stderr index ea80202dd0..f4cf865977 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail032.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail032.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ rnfail032.hs:2:21: - Not in scope: `Data.List.map' + Not in scope: ‛Data.List.map’ Perhaps you meant one of these: - `Data.List.zip' (imported from Data.List), - `Data.List.sum' (imported from Data.List), - `Data.List.all' (imported from Data.List) + ‛Data.List.zip’ (imported from Data.List), + ‛Data.List.sum’ (imported from Data.List), + ‛Data.List.all’ (imported from Data.List) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail033.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail033.stderr index c9abd0f87a..4a2e76222c 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail033.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail033.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ rnfail033.hs:2:21: - Not in scope: `Data.List.map' + Not in scope: ‛Data.List.map’ Perhaps you meant one of these: - `Data.List.zip' (imported from Data.List), - `Data.List.sum' (imported from Data.List), - `Data.List.all' (imported from Data.List) + ‛Data.List.zip’ (imported from Data.List), + ‛Data.List.sum’ (imported from Data.List), + ‛Data.List.all’ (imported from Data.List) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail034.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail034.stderr index 2ec0a3b8e5..6c9b49ec4f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail034.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail034.stderr @@ -2,5 +2,5 @@ rnfail034.hs:4:11: Qualified name in binding position: M.y rnfail034.hs:4:26: - Not in scope: `M.y' - Perhaps you meant `M.g' (line 4) + Not in scope: ‛M.y’ + Perhaps you meant ‛M.g’ (line 4) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail035.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail035.stderr index 83eb2d85e3..35dd128e24 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail035.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail035.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -rnfail035.hs:2:21: Not in scope: type constructor or class `C' +rnfail035.hs:2:21: Not in scope: type constructor or class ‛C’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail040.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail040.stderr index cacdaa8d8d..1ff86a8262 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail040.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail040.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ rnfail040.hs:7:12: - Conflicting exports for `nub': - `module M' exports `M.nub' - imported from `Data.List' at rnfail040.hs:10:2-22 - `module M' exports `T.nub' - imported from `Rnfail040_A' at rnfail040.hs:11:2-24 + Conflicting exports for ‛nub’: + ‛module M’ exports ‛M.nub’ + imported from ‛Data.List’ at rnfail040.hs:10:2-22 + ‛module M’ exports ‛T.nub’ + imported from ‛Rnfail040_A’ at rnfail040.hs:11:2-24 (and originally defined at Rnfail040_A.hs:2:3-5) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail041.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail041.stderr index 0c5c60d4d2..bebccf2176 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail041.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail041.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ rnfail041.hs:4:1: - The type signature for `h' lacks an accompanying binding + The type signature for ‛h’ lacks an accompanying binding rnfail041.hs:5:1: - The type signature for `j' lacks an accompanying binding + The type signature for ‛j’ lacks an accompanying binding diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail043.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail043.stderr index 428c1944dc..61cef734f9 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail043.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail043.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ rnfail043.hs:10:1: - Multiple declarations of `f' + Multiple declarations of ‛f’ Declared at: rnfail043.hs:6:1 rnfail043.hs:10:1 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail044.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail044.stderr index 48be6944d0..fdae4e17c0 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail044.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail044.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ rnfail044.hs:5:12: - Ambiguous occurrence `splitAt' - It could refer to either `A.splitAt', defined at rnfail044.hs:8:3 - or `Data.List.splitAt', - imported from `Prelude' at rnfail044.hs:5:8 - (and originally defined in `GHC.List') + Ambiguous occurrence ‛splitAt’ + It could refer to either ‛A.splitAt’, defined at rnfail044.hs:8:3 + or ‛Data.List.splitAt’, + imported from ‛Prelude’ at rnfail044.hs:5:8 + (and originally defined in ‛GHC.List’) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail045.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail045.stderr index d8c80008c0..9cba624ac3 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail045.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail045.stderr @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ rnfail045.hs:5:1: - Equations for `op1' have different numbers of arguments + Equations for ‛op1’ have different numbers of arguments rnfail045.hs:5:1-16 rnfail045.hs:6:1-13 rnfail045.hs:8:1: - Equations for `op2' have different numbers of arguments + Equations for ‛op2’ have different numbers of arguments rnfail045.hs:8:1-13 rnfail045.hs:9:1-16 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail048.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail048.stderr index 64cd89d280..7dd35d12a3 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail048.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail048.stderr @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ -
-rnfail048.hs:11:12:
- Duplicate INLINE pragmas for `foo'
- at rnfail048.hs:6:17-19
- rnfail048.hs:7:18-20
- rnfail048.hs:8:14-16
- rnfail048.hs:9:15-17
- rnfail048.hs:10:16-18
- rnfail048.hs:11:12-14
+ +rnfail048.hs:11:12: + Duplicate INLINE pragmas for ‛foo’ + at rnfail048.hs:6:17-19 + rnfail048.hs:7:18-20 + rnfail048.hs:8:14-16 + rnfail048.hs:9:15-17 + rnfail048.hs:10:16-18 + rnfail048.hs:11:12-14 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail049.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail049.stderr index 6b753fbf2d..8f08407ac2 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail049.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail049.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -rnfail049.hs:12:49: Not in scope: `f' +rnfail049.hs:12:49: Not in scope: ‛f’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail050.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail050.stderr index d097fc5b44..bbd1225438 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail050.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail050.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -rnfail050.hs:10:37: Not in scope: `f' +rnfail050.hs:10:37: Not in scope: ‛f’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail053.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail053.stderr index 47f44c4464..8dc85ab49e 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail053.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail053.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ rnfail053.hs:5:10: - Not a data constructor: `forall' + Not a data constructor: ‛forall’ Perhaps you intended to use -XExistentialQuantification diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail054.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail054.stderr index ab952aadeb..ef5b6d55b0 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail054.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail054.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ rnfail054.hs:6:13: - `foo' is not a record selector + ‛foo’ is not a record selector In the expression: x {foo = 1} - In an equation for `foo': foo x = x {foo = 1} + In an equation for ‛foo’: foo x = x {foo = 1} diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail055.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail055.stderr index cd559cca95..5f76021958 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail055.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail055.stderr @@ -6,22 +6,22 @@ RnFail055.hs-boot:1:73: Warning: -XDatatypeContexts is deprecated: It was widely considered a misfeature, and has been removed from the Haskell language. RnFail055.hs-boot:4:1: - Identifier `f1' has conflicting definitions in the module and its hs-boot file + Identifier ‛f1’ has conflicting definitions in the module and its hs-boot file Main module: f1 :: Int -> Float Boot file: f1 :: Float -> Int RnFail055.hs-boot:6:6: - Type constructor `S1' has conflicting definitions in the module and its hs-boot file + Type constructor ‛S1’ has conflicting definitions in the module and its hs-boot file Main module: type S1 a b = (a, b) Boot file: type S1 a b c = (a, b) RnFail055.hs-boot:8:6: - Type constructor `S2' has conflicting definitions in the module and its hs-boot file + Type constructor ‛S2’ has conflicting definitions in the module and its hs-boot file Main module: type S2 a b = forall a1. (a1, b) Boot file: type S2 a b = forall b1. (a, b1) RnFail055.hs-boot:12:6: - Type constructor `T1' has conflicting definitions in the module and its hs-boot file + Type constructor ‛T1’ has conflicting definitions in the module and its hs-boot file Main module: data T1 a b No C type associated RecFlag Recursive, Promotable @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ RnFail055.hs-boot:12:6: FamilyInstance: none RnFail055.hs-boot:14:16: - Type constructor `T2' has conflicting definitions in the module and its hs-boot file + Type constructor ‛T2’ has conflicting definitions in the module and its hs-boot file Main module: data Eq b => T2 a b No C type associated RecFlag Recursive, Promotable @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ RnFail055.hs-boot:17:12: T3' is exported by the hs-boot file, but not exported by the module RnFail055.hs-boot:21:6: - Type constructor `T5' has conflicting definitions in the module and its hs-boot file + Type constructor ‛T5’ has conflicting definitions in the module and its hs-boot file Main module: data T5 a No C type associated RecFlag Recursive, Promotable @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ RnFail055.hs-boot:21:6: FamilyInstance: none RnFail055.hs-boot:23:6: - Type constructor `T6' has conflicting definitions in the module and its hs-boot file + Type constructor ‛T6’ has conflicting definitions in the module and its hs-boot file Main module: data T6 No C type associated RecFlag Recursive, Not promotable @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ RnFail055.hs-boot:23:6: FamilyInstance: none RnFail055.hs-boot:25:6: - Type constructor `T7' has conflicting definitions in the module and its hs-boot file + Type constructor ‛T7’ has conflicting definitions in the module and its hs-boot file Main module: data T7 a No C type associated RecFlag Recursive, Promotable @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ RnFail055.hs-boot:27:22: RnFail055.m1 is exported by the hs-boot file, but not exported by the module RnFail055.hs-boot:28:7: - Class `C2' has conflicting definitions in the module and its hs-boot file + Class ‛C2’ has conflicting definitions in the module and its hs-boot file Main module: class C2 a b RecFlag Recursive m2 :: a -> b m2' :: a -> b @@ -104,6 +104,6 @@ RnFail055.hs-boot:28:7: m2 :: a -> b RnFail055.hs-boot:29:24: - Class `C3' has conflicting definitions in the module and its hs-boot file + Class ‛C3’ has conflicting definitions in the module and its hs-boot file Main module: class (Eq a, Ord a) => C3 a RecFlag Recursive Boot file: class (Ord a, Eq a) => C3 a RecFlag NonRecursive diff --git a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail057.stderr b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail057.stderr index 79a5ac7edc..682365654d 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail057.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/rename/should_fail/rnfail057.stderr @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ rnfail057.hs:5:16: - Not in scope: type constructor or class `DontExistKind' + Not in scope: type constructor or class ‛DontExistKind’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/flags/SafeFlags22.stderr b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/flags/SafeFlags22.stderr index abef5a8b8a..784f0472be 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/flags/SafeFlags22.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/flags/SafeFlags22.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ SafeFlags22.hs:1:16: Warning: - `SafeFlags22' has been inferred as unsafe! + ‛SafeFlags22’ has been inferred as unsafe! Reason: SafeFlags22.hs:7:1: System.IO.Unsafe: Can't be safely imported! diff --git a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/flags/SafeFlags23.stderr b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/flags/SafeFlags23.stderr index 410b8a1ba3..8af4d95f57 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/flags/SafeFlags23.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/flags/SafeFlags23.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ SafeFlags23.hs:1:16: Warning: - `SafeFlags22' has been inferred as unsafe! + ‛SafeFlags22’ has been inferred as unsafe! Reason: SafeFlags23.hs:7:1: System.IO.Unsafe: Can't be safely imported! diff --git a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/flags/SafeFlags25.stderr b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/flags/SafeFlags25.stderr index 3a1e971478..3e1d7b3607 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/flags/SafeFlags25.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/flags/SafeFlags25.stderr @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ SafeFlags25.hs:1:16: Warning: - `SafeFlags25' has been inferred as safe! + ‛SafeFlags25’ has been inferred as safe! diff --git a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/flags/SafeFlags26.stderr b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/flags/SafeFlags26.stderr index fd5b341d14..640f5be414 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/flags/SafeFlags26.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/flags/SafeFlags26.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ SafeFlags26.hs:1:16: Warning: - `SafeFlags26' has been inferred as safe! + ‛SafeFlags26’ has been inferred as safe! <no location info>: Failing due to -Werror. diff --git a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/ghci/p10.stderr b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/ghci/p10.stderr index 768948984e..71ace73569 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/ghci/p10.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/ghci/p10.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -<interactive>:10:1: Not in scope: `b' +<interactive>:10:1: Not in scope: ‛b’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/ghci/p13.stderr b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/ghci/p13.stderr index 5e31e43439..226aac2f05 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/ghci/p13.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/ghci/p13.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ <interactive>:12:1: Unsafe overlapping instances for Pos [Int] - arising from a use of `res' + arising from a use of ‛res’ The matching instance is: instance [overlap ok] [safe] Pos [Int] -- Defined at <interactive>:10:10 @@ -10,4 +10,4 @@ overlaps the following instances from different modules: instance [overlap ok] [safe] Pos [a] -- Defined at P13_A.hs:6:10 In the expression: res [1 :: Int, 2 :: Int] - In an equation for `it': it = res [1 :: Int, 2 :: Int] + In an equation for ‛it’: it = res [1 :: Int, 2 :: Int] diff --git a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/ghci/p15.stderr b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/ghci/p15.stderr index f50d460ed8..0bc16dfbf1 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/ghci/p15.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/ghci/p15.stderr @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ Top level: Warning: - Module `Data.OldTypeable' is deprecated: Use Data.Typeable instead + Module ‛Data.OldTypeable’ is deprecated: Use Data.Typeable instead <interactive>:10:36: Warning: - In the use of type constructor or class `Typeable' + In the use of type constructor or class ‛Typeable’ (imported from Data.OldTypeable, but defined in Data.OldTypeable.Internal): Deprecated: "Use Data.Typeable.Internal instead" @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ Top level: Warning: Can't create hand written instances of Typeable in Safe Haskell! Can only derive them <interactive>:22:22: - No instance for (Typeable G) arising from a use of `cast' + No instance for (Typeable G) arising from a use of ‛cast’ In the expression: (cast y) :: Maybe H In a pattern binding: (Just y_as_H) = (cast y) :: Maybe H -<interactive>:23:1: Not in scope: `y_as_H' +<interactive>:23:1: Not in scope: ‛y_as_H’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/ghci/p16.stderr b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/ghci/p16.stderr index 33602c70a5..373920e57d 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/ghci/p16.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/ghci/p16.stderr @@ -3,13 +3,13 @@ -XGeneralizedNewtypeDeriving is not allowed in Safe Haskell; ignoring -XGeneralizedNewtypeDeriving <interactive>:16:29: - Can't make a derived instance of `Op T2': - `Op' is not a derivable class + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Op T2’: + ‛Op’ is not a derivable class Try -XGeneralizedNewtypeDeriving for GHC's newtype-deriving extension - In the newtype declaration for `T2' + In the newtype declaration for ‛T2’ <interactive>:19:9: - Not in scope: data constructor `T2' - Perhaps you meant `T1' (line 13) + Not in scope: data constructor ‛T2’ + Perhaps you meant ‛T1’ (line 13) -<interactive>:22:4: Not in scope: `y' +<interactive>:22:4: Not in scope: ‛y’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/ghci/p4.stderr b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/ghci/p4.stderr index 8ff4107af8..8ff140a7bd 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/ghci/p4.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/ghci/p4.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ -<interactive>:6:9: Not in scope: `System.IO.Unsafe.unsafePerformIO' +<interactive>:6:9: Not in scope: ‛System.IO.Unsafe.unsafePerformIO’ -<interactive>:7:9: Not in scope: `x' +<interactive>:7:9: Not in scope: ‛x’ -<interactive>:8:1: Not in scope: `y' +<interactive>:8:1: Not in scope: ‛y’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/ghci/p6.stderr b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/ghci/p6.stderr index b32c521b4d..f46c1f815e 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/ghci/p6.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/ghci/p6.stderr @@ -6,5 +6,5 @@ foreign import ccall safe "static sin" c_sin :: Double -> Double <interactive>:13:1: - Not in scope: `c_sin' - Perhaps you meant c_sin' (line 8) + Not in scope: ‛c_sin’ + Perhaps you meant ‛c_sin'’ (line 8) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/ghci/p9.stderr b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/ghci/p9.stderr index 768948984e..71ace73569 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/ghci/p9.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/ghci/p9.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -<interactive>:10:1: Not in scope: `b' +<interactive>:10:1: Not in scope: ‛b’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/safeInfered/UnsafeInfered07.stderr b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/safeInfered/UnsafeInfered07.stderr index 4a83680d53..e318319eaa 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/safeInfered/UnsafeInfered07.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/safeInfered/UnsafeInfered07.stderr @@ -1,20 +1,20 @@ [1 of 2] Compiling UnsafeInfered07_A ( UnsafeInfered07_A.hs, UnsafeInfered07_A.o ) UnsafeInfered07_A.hs:4:1: Warning: - Module `Data.OldTypeable' is deprecated: Use Data.Typeable instead + Module ‛Data.OldTypeable’ is deprecated: Use Data.Typeable instead UnsafeInfered07_A.hs:8:10: Warning: - In the use of type constructor or class `Typeable' + In the use of type constructor or class ‛Typeable’ (imported from Data.OldTypeable, but defined in Data.OldTypeable.Internal): Deprecated: "Use Data.Typeable.Internal instead" UnsafeInfered07_A.hs:8:10: Warning: - In the use of type constructor or class `Typeable' + In the use of type constructor or class ‛Typeable’ (imported from Data.OldTypeable, but defined in Data.OldTypeable.Internal): Deprecated: "Use Data.Typeable.Internal instead" UnsafeInfered07_A.hs:9:16: Warning: - In the use of `typeOf' + In the use of ‛typeOf’ (imported from Data.OldTypeable, but defined in Data.OldTypeable.Internal): Deprecated: "Use Data.Typeable.Internal instead" [2 of 2] Compiling UnsafeInfered07 ( UnsafeInfered07.hs, UnsafeInfered07.o ) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/safeInfered/UnsafeInfered11.stderr b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/safeInfered/UnsafeInfered11.stderr index a6051e1b3d..ec700d62fd 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/safeInfered/UnsafeInfered11.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/safeInfered/UnsafeInfered11.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ [1 of 2] Compiling UnsafeInfered11_A ( UnsafeInfered11_A.hs, UnsafeInfered11_A.o ) UnsafeInfered11_A.hs:1:16: Warning: - `UnsafeInfered11_A' has been inferred as unsafe! + ‛UnsafeInfered11_A’ has been inferred as unsafe! Reason: UnsafeInfered11_A.hs:17:11: Warning: Rule "lookupx/T" ignored diff --git a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/safeInfered/UnsafeInfered12.stderr b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/safeInfered/UnsafeInfered12.stderr index 8b6ec36bb9..53d7a4c328 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/safeInfered/UnsafeInfered12.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/safeInfered/UnsafeInfered12.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ UnsafeInfered12.hs:2:16: Warning: - `UnsafeInfered12' has been inferred as unsafe! + ‛UnsafeInfered12’ has been inferred as unsafe! Reason: UnsafeInfered12.hs:1:14: -XTemplateHaskell is not allowed in Safe Haskell diff --git a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/safeLanguage/SafeLang07.stderr b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/safeLanguage/SafeLang07.stderr index cb081b0ebe..50c0ef7e56 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/safeLanguage/SafeLang07.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/safeLanguage/SafeLang07.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -SafeLang07.hs:2:14: - Warning: -XGeneralizedNewtypeDeriving is not allowed in Safe Haskell; ignoring -XGeneralizedNewtypeDeriving +SafeLang07.hs:2:14: Warning: + -XGeneralizedNewtypeDeriving is not allowed in Safe Haskell; ignoring -XGeneralizedNewtypeDeriving SafeLang07.hs:15:1: - Failed to load interface for `SafeLang07_A' + Failed to load interface for ‛SafeLang07_A’ Use -v to see a list of the files searched for. diff --git a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/safeLanguage/SafeLang10.stderr b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/safeLanguage/SafeLang10.stderr index de88221c28..a226c79744 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/safeLanguage/SafeLang10.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/safeLanguage/SafeLang10.stderr @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ SafeLang10.hs:8:13: Unsafe overlapping instances for Pos [Int] - arising from a use of `res' + arising from a use of ‛res’ The matching instance is: instance [overlap ok] [safe] Pos [Int] -- Defined at SafeLang10_B.hs:14:10 @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ SafeLang10.hs:8:13: overlaps the following instances from different modules: instance Pos [a] -- Defined at SafeLang10_A.hs:13:10 In the expression: res [(1 :: Int)] - In an equation for `r': r = res [(1 :: Int)] + In an equation for ‛r’: r = res [(1 :: Int)] In the expression: do { let r = res ...; putStrLn $ "Result: " ++ show r; diff --git a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/unsafeLibs/Dep01.stderr b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/unsafeLibs/Dep01.stderr index de3016e534..656408bc48 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/unsafeLibs/Dep01.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/unsafeLibs/Dep01.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ Dep01.hs:8:12: Warning: - In the use of `unsafeSTToIO' (imported from Control.Monad.ST): + In the use of ‛unsafeSTToIO’ (imported from Control.Monad.ST): Deprecated: "Please import from Control.Monad.ST.Unsafe instead; This will be removed in the next release" diff --git a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/unsafeLibs/Dep02.stderr b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/unsafeLibs/Dep02.stderr index 531fda011d..4ea40a834f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/unsafeLibs/Dep02.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/safeHaskell/unsafeLibs/Dep02.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ Dep02.hs:15:17: Warning: - In the use of `unsafeIOToST' (imported from Control.Monad.ST.Lazy): + In the use of ‛unsafeIOToST’ (imported from Control.Monad.ST.Lazy): Deprecated: "Please import from Control.Monad.ST.Lazy.Unsafe instead; This will be removed in the next release" diff --git a/testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/T4398.stderr b/testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/T4398.stderr index ab17c8a4e9..692583e680 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/T4398.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/T4398.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,3 @@ -
-T4398.hs:5:11:
- Warning: Forall'd constraint `Ord a' is not bound in RULE lhs
- f @ a x y
+ +T4398.hs:5:11: Warning: + Forall'd constraint ‛Ord a’ is not bound in RULE lhs f @ a x y diff --git a/testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/T5359b.stderr b/testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/T5359b.stderr index a3484cfd44..6106f3e17b 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/T5359b.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/T5359b.stderr @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ T5359b.hs:62:1: Warning: - SPECIALISE pragma on INLINE function probably won't fire: `genum' + SPECIALISE pragma on INLINE function probably won't fire: ‛genum’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/T6082-RULE.stderr b/testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/T6082-RULE.stderr index a503b77d15..e133ec7e58 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/T6082-RULE.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/T6082-RULE.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ T6082-RULE.hs:5:11: Warning: - Rule "foo1" may never fire because `foo1' might inline first - Probable fix: add an INLINE[n] or NOINLINE[n] pragma on `foo1' + Rule "foo1" may never fire because ‛foo1’ might inline first + Probable fix: add an INLINE[n] or NOINLINE[n] pragma on ‛foo1’ T6082-RULE.hs:10:11: Warning: - Rule "foo2" may never fire because `foo2' might inline first - Probable fix: add an INLINE[n] or NOINLINE[n] pragma on `foo2' + Rule "foo2" may never fire because ‛foo2’ might inline first + Probable fix: add an INLINE[n] or NOINLINE[n] pragma on ‛foo2’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/simpl016.stderr b/testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/simpl016.stderr index 681dd10cab..0bd07fd0eb 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/simpl016.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/simpl016.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -simpl016.hs:5:1: - Warning: Forall'd constraint `Num b' is not bound in RULE lhs
- delta' @ Int @ b GHC.Classes.$fEqInt
+simpl016.hs:5:1: Warning: + Forall'd constraint ‛Num b’ is not bound in RULE lhs + delta' @ Int @ b GHC.Classes.$fEqInt diff --git a/testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/simpl017.stderr b/testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/simpl017.stderr index 334691d2c2..26068534b3 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/simpl017.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/simpl017.stderr @@ -1,26 +1,26 @@ simpl017.hs:44:12: - Couldn't match expected type `forall v. [E m i] -> E' v m a' - with actual type `[E m i] -> E' v0 m a' + Couldn't match expected type ‛forall v. [E m i] -> E' v m a’ + with actual type ‛[E m i] -> E' v0 m a’ Relevant bindings include liftArray :: arr i a -> E m (forall v. [E m i] -> E' v m a) (bound at simpl017.hs:39:1) a :: arr i a (bound at simpl017.hs:39:11) ix :: [E m i] -> m i (bound at simpl017.hs:41:9) f :: [E m i] -> E' v0 m a (bound at simpl017.hs:43:9) - In the first argument of `return', namely `f' + In the first argument of ‛return’, namely ‛f’ In a stmt of a 'do' block: return f - In the first argument of `E', namely - `(do { let ix :: [E m i] -> m i + In the first argument of ‛E’, namely + ‛(do { let ix :: [E m i] -> m i ix [i] = runE i {-# INLINE f #-} ....; - return f })' + return f })’ simpl017.hs:63:5: - Couldn't match type `forall v. - [E' RValue (ST s) Int] -> E' v (ST s) Int' - with `[E (ST t0) Int] -> E' RValue (ST s) Int' + Couldn't match type ‛forall v. + [E' RValue (ST s) Int] -> E' v (ST s) Int’ + with ‛[E (ST t0) Int] -> E' RValue (ST s) Int’ Expected type: [E (ST t0) Int] -> E (ST s) Int Actual type: forall v. [E (ST s) Int] -> E' v (ST s) Int Relevant bindings include @@ -28,15 +28,15 @@ simpl017.hs:63:5: ma :: STArray s Int Int (bound at simpl017.hs:59:5) a :: forall v. [E (ST s) Int] -> E' v (ST s) Int (bound at simpl017.hs:60:5) - The function `a' is applied to one argument, - but its type `forall v. [E (ST s) Int] -> E' v (ST s) Int' has none - In the first argument of `plus', namely `a [one]' + The function ‛a’ is applied to one argument, + but its type ‛forall v. [E (ST s) Int] -> E' v (ST s) Int’ has none + In the first argument of ‛plus’, namely ‛a [one]’ In a stmt of a 'do' block: a [one] `plus` a [one] simpl017.hs:63:19: - Couldn't match type `forall v. - [E' RValue (ST s) Int] -> E' v (ST s) Int' - with `[E (ST t1) Int] -> E' RValue (ST s) Int' + Couldn't match type ‛forall v. + [E' RValue (ST s) Int] -> E' v (ST s) Int’ + with ‛[E (ST t1) Int] -> E' RValue (ST s) Int’ Expected type: [E (ST t1) Int] -> E (ST s) Int Actual type: forall v. [E (ST s) Int] -> E' v (ST s) Int Relevant bindings include @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ simpl017.hs:63:19: ma :: STArray s Int Int (bound at simpl017.hs:59:5) a :: forall v. [E (ST s) Int] -> E' v (ST s) Int (bound at simpl017.hs:60:5) - The function `a' is applied to one argument, - but its type `forall v. [E (ST s) Int] -> E' v (ST s) Int' has none - In the second argument of `plus', namely `a [one]' + The function ‛a’ is applied to one argument, + but its type ‛forall v. [E (ST s) Int] -> E' v (ST s) Int’ has none + In the second argument of ‛plus’, namely ‛a [one]’ In a stmt of a 'do' block: a [one] `plus` a [one] diff --git a/testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/simpl020.stderr b/testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/simpl020.stderr index cd84c1d2d3..d23a8ddf23 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/simpl020.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/simplCore/should_compile/simpl020.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ -Simpl020_A.hs:25:10: - Warning: No explicit method or default declaration for `toGUIObject' - In the instance declaration for `GUIObject ()' +Simpl020_A.hs:25:10: Warning: + No explicit method or default declaration for ‛toGUIObject’ + In the instance declaration for ‛GUIObject ()’ -Simpl020_A.hs:25:10: - Warning: No explicit method or default declaration for `cset' - In the instance declaration for `GUIObject ()' +Simpl020_A.hs:25:10: Warning: + No explicit method or default declaration for ‛cset’ + In the instance declaration for ‛GUIObject ()’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/th/T2597b.stderr b/testsuite/tests/th/T2597b.stderr index 8881b81044..a9295ebd5f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/th/T2597b.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/th/T2597b.stderr @@ -3,4 +3,4 @@ T2597b.hs:8:8: Empty stmt list in do-block When splicing a TH expression: do In the expression: $mkBug2 - In an equation for `bug2': bug2 = $mkBug2 + In an equation for ‛bug2’: bug2 = $mkBug2 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/th/T2674.stderr b/testsuite/tests/th/T2674.stderr index a69781dfe4..6875684dda 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/th/T2674.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/th/T2674.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ T2674.hs:9:3: - Function binding for `foo' has no equations + Function binding for ‛foo’ has no equations When splicing a TH declaration: diff --git a/testsuite/tests/th/T2713.stderr b/testsuite/tests/th/T2713.stderr index 16f130c65a..c036b43848 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/th/T2713.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/th/T2713.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ T2713.hs:11:10: - The fixity signature for `.*.' lacks an accompanying binding - (The fixity signature must be given where `.*.' is declared) + The fixity signature for ‛.*.’ lacks an accompanying binding + (The fixity signature must be given where ‛.*.’ is declared) T2713.hs:12:1: - The type signature for `f' lacks an accompanying binding - (The type signature must be given where `f' is declared) + The type signature for ‛f’ lacks an accompanying binding + (The type signature must be given where ‛f’ is declared) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/th/T3177a.stderr b/testsuite/tests/th/T3177a.stderr index a39419b948..4e9d4dd8fa 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/th/T3177a.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/th/T3177a.stderr @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ T3177a.hs:8:15: - `Int' is applied to too many type arguments - In the type `Int Int' + ‛Int’ is applied to too many type arguments + In the type ‛Int Int’ In the Template Haskell quotation [t| Int Int |] - In the first argument of `id', namely `[t| Int Int |]' + In the first argument of ‛id’, namely ‛[t| Int Int |]’ T3177a.hs:11:6: - `Int' is applied to too many type arguments - In the type signature for `g': g :: Int Int + ‛Int’ is applied to too many type arguments + In the type signature for ‛g’: g :: Int Int diff --git a/testsuite/tests/th/T3395.stderr b/testsuite/tests/th/T3395.stderr index f85f7cc1da..cd25afe039 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/th/T3395.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/th/T3395.stderr @@ -5,12 +5,13 @@ T3395.hs:6:9: (It should be an expression.) When splicing a TH expression: [r1 <- undefined | undefined] In the expression: - $(return + $(return $ CompE [NoBindS (VarE $ mkName "undefined"), BindS (VarP $ mkName "r1") (VarE $ mkName "undefined")]) - In an equation for `foo': - foo = $(return + In an equation for ‛foo’: + foo + = $(return $ CompE [NoBindS (VarE $ mkName "undefined"), BindS (VarP $ mkName "r1") (VarE $ mkName "undefined")]) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/th/T5358.stderr b/testsuite/tests/th/T5358.stderr index 26c83758d5..bc4138f8a9 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/th/T5358.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/th/T5358.stderr @@ -1,43 +1,43 @@ T5358.hs:7:1: - Couldn't match expected type `t1 -> t1' with actual type `Int' - The equation(s) for `t1' have one argument, - but its type `Int' has none + Couldn't match expected type ‛t1 -> t1’ with actual type ‛Int’ + The equation(s) for ‛t1’ have one argument, + but its type ‛Int’ has none T5358.hs:8:1: - Couldn't match expected type `t0 -> t0' with actual type `Int' - The equation(s) for `t2' have one argument, - but its type `Int' has none + Couldn't match expected type ‛t0 -> t0’ with actual type ‛Int’ + The equation(s) for ‛t2’ have one argument, + but its type ‛Int’ has none T5358.hs:10:13: - Couldn't match expected type `t -> a0' with actual type `Int' + Couldn't match expected type ‛t -> a0’ with actual type ‛Int’ Relevant bindings include prop_x1 :: t -> Bool (bound at T5358.hs:10:1) x :: t (bound at T5358.hs:10:9) - The function `t1' is applied to one argument, - but its type `Int' has none - In the first argument of `(==)', namely `t1 x' + The function ‛t1’ is applied to one argument, + but its type ‛Int’ has none + In the first argument of ‛(==)’, namely ‛t1 x’ In the expression: t1 x == t2 x T5358.hs:10:21: - Couldn't match expected type `t -> a0' with actual type `Int' + Couldn't match expected type ‛t -> a0’ with actual type ‛Int’ Relevant bindings include prop_x1 :: t -> Bool (bound at T5358.hs:10:1) x :: t (bound at T5358.hs:10:9) - The function `t2' is applied to one argument, - but its type `Int' has none - In the second argument of `(==)', namely `t2 x' + The function ‛t2’ is applied to one argument, + but its type ‛Int’ has none + In the second argument of ‛(==)’, namely ‛t2 x’ In the expression: t1 x == t2 x T5358.hs:12:15: Exception when trying to run compile-time code: runTest called error: forall t_0 . t_0 -> GHC.Types.Bool - Code: do { VarI _ t _ _ <- reify (mkName "prop_x1"); - ($) error ((++) "runTest called error: " pprint t) } + Code: do { VarI _ t _ _ <- reify (mkName "prop_x1"); + ($) error ((++) "runTest called error: " pprint t) } In the expression: $(do { VarI _ t _ _ <- reify (mkName "prop_x1"); error $ ("runTest called error: " ++ pprint t) }) - In an equation for `runTests': + In an equation for ‛runTests’: runTests = $(do { VarI _ t _ _ <- reify (mkName "prop_x1"); error $ ("runTest called error: " ++ pprint t) }) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/th/T5795.stderr b/testsuite/tests/th/T5795.stderr index 5fce537ea6..74d6c34941 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/th/T5795.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/th/T5795.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ T5795.hs:9:6: GHC stage restriction: - `ty' is used in a top-level splice or annotation, + ‛ty’ is used in a top-level splice or annotation, and must be imported, not defined locally In the expression: ty - In the type signature for `f': f :: $ty + In the type signature for ‛f’: f :: $ty diff --git a/testsuite/tests/th/T5971.stderr b/testsuite/tests/th/T5971.stderr index 3a06330a47..9f3f993813 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/th/T5971.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/th/T5971.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ T5971.hs:6:7: - The exact Name `x' is not in scope + The exact Name ‛x’ is not in scope Probable cause: you used a unique Template Haskell name (NameU), perhaps via newName, but did not bind it If that's it, then -ddump-splices might be useful diff --git a/testsuite/tests/th/T6114.stderr b/testsuite/tests/th/T6114.stderr index 253c7c4d67..e588ada7f3 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/th/T6114.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/th/T6114.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ T6114.hs:6:17: - The exact Name `x' is not in scope + The exact Name ‛x’ is not in scope Probable cause: you used a unique Template Haskell name (NameU), perhaps via newName, but did not bind it If that's it, then -ddump-splices might be useful @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ T6114.hs:6:17: instanceType <- [t| $(varT xName) |]; _ <- reifyInstances ''Eq [instanceType]; .... }) - In an equation for `instanceVar': + In an equation for ‛instanceVar’: instanceVar = $(do { xName <- newName "x"; instanceType <- [t| $(varT xName) |]; diff --git a/testsuite/tests/th/T7276.stderr b/testsuite/tests/th/T7276.stderr index aeb36647dc..d1bb7c71fe 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/th/T7276.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/th/T7276.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ T7276.hs:6:8: - Couldn't match type `[Language.Haskell.TH.Syntax.Dec]' - with `Language.Haskell.TH.Syntax.Exp' + Couldn't match type ‛[Language.Haskell.TH.Syntax.Dec]’ + with ‛Language.Haskell.TH.Syntax.Exp’ Expected type: Language.Haskell.TH.Lib.ExpQ Actual type: Language.Haskell.TH.Lib.DecsQ In the Template Haskell quotation [d| y = 3 |] diff --git a/testsuite/tests/th/T7276a.stdout b/testsuite/tests/th/T7276a.stdout index 8c4f7afc64..15ece93372 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/th/T7276a.stdout +++ b/testsuite/tests/th/T7276a.stdout @@ -1,21 +1,21 @@ <interactive>:4:9: Warning: - Couldn't match type `[Dec]' with `Exp' + Couldn't match type ‛[Dec]’ with ‛Exp’ Expected type: Q Exp Actual type: DecsQ In the Template Haskell quotation [d| a = () |] In the expression: [d| a = () |] :: Q Exp - In an equation for `x': x = [d| a = () |] :: Q Exp + In an equation for ‛x’: x = [d| a = () |] :: Q Exp <interactive>:1:1: Exception when trying to run compile-time code: <interactive>:4:9: - Couldn't match type `[Dec]' with `Exp' + Couldn't match type ‛[Dec]’ with ‛Exp’ Expected type: Q Exp Actual type: DecsQ In the Template Haskell quotation [d| a = () |] In the expression: [d| a = () |] :: Q Exp - In an equation for `x': x = [d| a = () |] :: Q Exp + In an equation for ‛x’: x = [d| a = () |] :: Q Exp (deferred type error) Code: x In the expression: $x diff --git a/testsuite/tests/th/TH_1tuple.stderr b/testsuite/tests/th/TH_1tuple.stderr index cb8889e4ca..309bde5ebf 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/th/TH_1tuple.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/th/TH_1tuple.stderr @@ -3,4 +3,4 @@ TH_1tuple.hs:11:7: Illegal 1-tuple type constructor When splicing a TH expression: 1 :: () In the expression: $(sigE [| 1 |] (tupleT 1)) - In an equation for `y': y = $(sigE [| 1 |] (tupleT 1)) + In an equation for ‛y’: y = $(sigE [| 1 |] (tupleT 1)) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/th/TH_dupdecl.stderr b/testsuite/tests/th/TH_dupdecl.stderr index a8628a3de7..4bd90febad 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/th/TH_dupdecl.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/th/TH_dupdecl.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ TH_dupdecl.hs:10:4: - Multiple declarations of `x' + Multiple declarations of ‛x’ Declared at: TH_dupdecl.hs:8:4 TH_dupdecl.hs:10:4 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/th/TH_runIO.stderr b/testsuite/tests/th/TH_runIO.stderr index f7a536a95a..6d7499a3da 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/th/TH_runIO.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/th/TH_runIO.stderr @@ -2,6 +2,6 @@ TH_runIO.hs:12:9: Exception when trying to run compile-time code: user error (hi) - Code: runIO (fail "hi") + Code: runIO (fail "hi") In the expression: $(runIO (fail "hi")) - In an equation for `foo': foo = $(runIO (fail "hi")) + In an equation for ‛foo’: foo = $(runIO (fail "hi")) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/th/TH_spliceD1.stderr b/testsuite/tests/th/TH_spliceD1.stderr index d54ef19b88..2a93bb4f5a 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/th/TH_spliceD1.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/th/TH_spliceD1.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ TH_spliceD1.hs:10:3: - Conflicting definitions for `c' + Conflicting definitions for ‛c’ Bound at: TH_spliceD1.hs:10:3-5 TH_spliceD1.hs:10:3-5 - In an equation for `f' + In an equation for ‛f’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/th/TH_unresolvedInfix2.stderr b/testsuite/tests/th/TH_unresolvedInfix2.stderr index a23cd4ae91..fab508a331 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/th/TH_unresolvedInfix2.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/th/TH_unresolvedInfix2.stderr @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ TH_unresolvedInfix2.hs:12:11: - The operator `:+' [infixl 6] of a section + The operator ‛:+’ [infixl 6] of a section must have lower precedence than that of the operand, - namely `:+' [infixl 6] - in the section: `:+ N :+ N' + namely ‛:+’ [infixl 6] + in the section: ‛:+ N :+ N’ In the result of the splice: $(let plus = conE ':+ @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ TH_unresolvedInfix2.hs:12:11: plus = conE ... n = conE ... in infixE Nothing plus (Just $ uInfixE n plus n)) - In an equation for `expr': + In an equation for ‛expr’: expr = $(let plus = ... diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/bug1465/bug1465.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/bug1465/bug1465.stderr index 47a4d0c616..3108183be2 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/bug1465/bug1465.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/bug1465/bug1465.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ C.hs:6:11: - Couldn't match expected type `bug1465-1.0:A.T' - with actual type `A.T' + Couldn't match expected type ‛bug1465-1.0:A.T’ + with actual type ‛A.T’ In the expression: B2.f In the expression: [B1.f, B2.f] - In an equation for `x': x = [B1.f, B2.f] + In an equation for ‛x’: x = [B1.f, B2.f] diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/prog001/typecheck.prog001.stderr-ghc b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/prog001/typecheck.prog001.stderr-ghc index 17d8e2cf84..4652417ce6 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/prog001/typecheck.prog001.stderr-ghc +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/prog001/typecheck.prog001.stderr-ghc @@ -1,5 +1,4 @@ -B.hs:7:10: - Warning: No explicit method or default declaration for `row' - In the instance declaration for `Matrix Bool Val' - +B.hs:7:10: Warning: + No explicit method or default declaration for ‛row’ + In the instance declaration for ‛Matrix Bool Val’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/FD1.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/FD1.stderr index fdeb30e42d..5fa16fdf15 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/FD1.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/FD1.stderr @@ -5,9 +5,9 @@ FD1.hs:16:1: bound by the type signature for plus :: E a (Int -> Int) => Int -> a at FD1.hs:15:9-38 - `a' is a rigid type variable bound by + ‛a’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for plus :: E a (Int -> Int) => Int -> a at FD1.hs:15:9 Relevant bindings include plus :: Int -> a (bound at FD1.hs:16:1) - The equation(s) for `plus' have two arguments, - but its type `Int -> a' has only one + The equation(s) for ‛plus’ have two arguments, + but its type ‛Int -> a’ has only one diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/FD2.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/FD2.stderr index 8822c1ccb2..c98c9cf480 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/FD2.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/FD2.stderr @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ FD2.hs:26:34: Could not deduce (e ~ e1) from the context (Foldable a) - bound by the class declaration for `Foldable' + bound by the class declaration for ‛Foldable’ at FD2.hs:(17,1)-(26,39) or from (Elem a e) bound by the type signature for @@ -12,11 +12,11 @@ FD2.hs:26:34: bound by the type signature for mf :: Elem a e1 => e1 -> Maybe e1 -> Maybe e1 at FD2.hs:24:18-54 - `e' is a rigid type variable bound by + ‛e’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for foldr1 :: Elem a e => (e -> e -> e) -> a -> e at FD2.hs:21:13 - `e1' is a rigid type variable bound by + ‛e1’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for mf :: Elem a e1 => e1 -> Maybe e1 -> Maybe e1 at FD2.hs:24:18 @@ -26,6 +26,6 @@ FD2.hs:26:34: mf :: e1 -> Maybe e1 -> Maybe e1 (bound at FD2.hs:25:12) x :: e1 (bound at FD2.hs:26:15) y :: e1 (bound at FD2.hs:26:23) - In the return type of a call of `f' - In the first argument of `Just', namely `(f x y)' + In the return type of a call of ‛f’ + In the first argument of ‛Just’, namely ‛(f x y)’ In the expression: Just (f x y) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/FD3.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/FD3.stderr index ad849e6b0f..9c0a11c36c 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/FD3.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/FD3.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ FD3.hs:15:15: - Couldn't match type `a' with `(String, a)' - `a' is a rigid type variable bound by + Couldn't match type ‛a’ with ‛(String, a)’ + ‛a’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for translate :: (String, a) -> A a at FD3.hs:14:14 Relevant bindings include @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ FD3.hs:15:15: a :: (String, a) (bound at FD3.hs:15:11) When using functional dependencies to combine MkA a a, - arising from the dependency `a -> b' + arising from the dependency ‛a -> b’ in the instance declaration at FD3.hs:12:10 - MkA (String, a) a, arising from a use of `mkA' at FD3.hs:15:15-17 + MkA (String, a) a, arising from a use of ‛mkA’ at FD3.hs:15:15-17 In the expression: mkA a - In an equation for `translate': translate a = mkA a + In an equation for ‛translate’: translate a = mkA a diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/T2494.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/T2494.stderr index bbb8d0c946..68b8dd4be1 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/T2494.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/T2494.stderr @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ T2494.hs:15:14: - Couldn't match type `a' with `b' - `a' is a rigid type variable bound by + Couldn't match type ‛a’ with ‛b’ + ‛a’ is a rigid type variable bound by the RULE "foo/foo" at T2494.hs:13:16 - `b' is a rigid type variable bound by + ‛b’ is a rigid type variable bound by the RULE "foo/foo" at T2494.hs:14:16 Expected type: Maybe (m a) -> Maybe (m a) Actual type: Maybe (m b) -> Maybe (m b) @@ -13,15 +13,15 @@ T2494.hs:15:14: (bound at T2494.hs:14:11) f :: forall (m :: * -> *). Monad m => Maybe (m a) -> Maybe (m a) (bound at T2494.hs:13:11) - In the first argument of `foo', namely `g' - In the second argument of `foo', namely `(foo g x)' + In the first argument of ‛foo’, namely ‛g’ + In the second argument of ‛foo’, namely ‛(foo g x)’ In the expression: foo f (foo g x) T2494.hs:15:30: - Couldn't match type `a' with `b' - `a' is a rigid type variable bound by + Couldn't match type ‛a’ with ‛b’ + ‛a’ is a rigid type variable bound by the RULE "foo/foo" at T2494.hs:13:16 - `b' is a rigid type variable bound by + ‛b’ is a rigid type variable bound by the RULE "foo/foo" at T2494.hs:14:16 Expected type: Maybe (m a) -> Maybe (m a) Actual type: Maybe (m b) -> Maybe (m b) @@ -31,6 +31,6 @@ T2494.hs:15:30: (bound at T2494.hs:14:11) f :: forall (m :: * -> *). Monad m => Maybe (m a) -> Maybe (m a) (bound at T2494.hs:13:11) - In the second argument of `(.)', namely `g' - In the first argument of `foo', namely `(f . g)' + In the second argument of ‛(.)’, namely ‛g’ + In the first argument of ‛foo’, namely ‛(f . g)’ In the expression: foo (f . g) x diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/T2497.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/T2497.stderr index de6ca484b5..7ee9bee08e 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/T2497.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/T2497.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -T2497.hs:18:1: Warning: Defined but not used: `beq' +T2497.hs:18:1: Warning: Defined but not used: ‛beq’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/T5481.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/T5481.stderr index c88aecbca6..931c3e0420 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/T5481.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/T5481.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ T5481.hs:6:10: - The RHS of an associated type declaration mentions type variable `b' + The RHS of an associated type declaration mentions type variable ‛b’ All such variables must be bound on the LHS T5481.hs:8:10: - The RHS of an associated type declaration mentions type variable `a' + The RHS of an associated type declaration mentions type variable ‛a’ All such variables must be bound on the LHS diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/T7050.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/T7050.stderr index e7330ce4f5..860c90757f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/T7050.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/T7050.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ T7050.hs:3:14: Warning: - Ignoring unusable UNPACK pragma on the first argument of `Foo' - In the definition of data constructor `Foo' - In the data declaration for `Foo' + Ignoring unusable UNPACK pragma on the first argument of ‛Foo’ + In the definition of data constructor ‛Foo’ + In the data declaration for ‛Foo’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/T7562.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/T7562.stderr index 1460def5cb..36f1de5780 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/T7562.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/T7562.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ T7562.hs:3:14: Warning: - UNPACK pragma lacks '!' on the first argument of `Pair2' - In the definition of data constructor `Pair2' - In the data declaration for `Pair2' + UNPACK pragma lacks '!' on the first argument of ‛Pair2’ + In the definition of data constructor ‛Pair2’ + In the data declaration for ‛Pair2’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/holes.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/holes.stderr index b04bb8f8ea..6f00061cbd 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/holes.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/holes.stderr @@ -1,26 +1,26 @@ holes.hs:5:5: Warning: - Found hole `_' with type: t - Where: `t' is a rigid type variable bound by + Found hole ‛_’ with type: t + Where: ‛t’ is a rigid type variable bound by the inferred type of f :: t at holes.hs:5:1 Relevant bindings include f :: t (bound at holes.hs:5:1) In the expression: _ - In an equation for `f': f = _ + In an equation for ‛f’: f = _ holes.hs:8:7: Warning: - Found hole `_' with type: Char + Found hole ‛_’ with type: Char In the expression: _ - In an equation for `g': g x = _ + In an equation for ‛g’: g x = _ holes.hs:10:5: Warning: - Found hole `_' with type: [Char] - In the first argument of `(++)', namely `_' + Found hole ‛_’ with type: [Char] + In the first argument of ‛(++)’, namely ‛_’ In the expression: _ ++ "a" - In an equation for `h': h = _ ++ "a" + In an equation for ‛h’: h = _ ++ "a" holes.hs:13:15: Warning: - Found hole `_' with type: b0 - Where: `b0' is an ambiguous type variable - In the second argument of `const', namely `_' + Found hole ‛_’ with type: b0 + Where: ‛b0’ is an ambiguous type variable + In the second argument of ‛const’, namely ‛_’ In the expression: const y _ - In an equation for `z': z y = const y _ + In an equation for ‛z’: z y = const y _ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/holes2.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/holes2.stderr index 9945d288f4..5ceb46e05f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/holes2.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/holes2.stderr @@ -1,19 +1,19 @@ holes2.hs:5:5: Warning: - No instance for (Show a0) arising from a use of `show' - The type variable `a0' is ambiguous + No instance for (Show a0) arising from a use of ‛show’ + The type variable ‛a0’ is ambiguous Note: there are several potential instances: - instance Show Double -- Defined in `GHC.Float' - instance Show Float -- Defined in `GHC.Float' + instance Show Double -- Defined in ‛GHC.Float’ + instance Show Float -- Defined in ‛GHC.Float’ instance (Integral a, Show a) => Show (GHC.Real.Ratio a) - -- Defined in `GHC.Real' + -- Defined in ‛GHC.Real’ ...plus 23 others In the expression: show _ - In an equation for `f': f = show _ + In an equation for ‛f’: f = show _ holes2.hs:5:10: Warning: - Found hole `_' with type: a0 - Where: `a0' is an ambiguous type variable - In the first argument of `show', namely `_' + Found hole ‛_’ with type: a0 + Where: ‛a0’ is an ambiguous type variable + In the first argument of ‛show’, namely ‛_’ In the expression: show _ - In an equation for `f': f = show _ + In an equation for ‛f’: f = show _ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/holes3.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/holes3.stderr index 87c80fe300..a945e5e251 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/holes3.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/holes3.stderr @@ -1,26 +1,26 @@ holes3.hs:5:5: - Found hole `_' with type: t - Where: `t' is a rigid type variable bound by + Found hole ‛_’ with type: t + Where: ‛t’ is a rigid type variable bound by the inferred type of f :: t at holes3.hs:5:1 Relevant bindings include f :: t (bound at holes3.hs:5:1) In the expression: _ - In an equation for `f': f = _ + In an equation for ‛f’: f = _ holes3.hs:8:7: - Found hole `_gr' with type: Char + Found hole ‛_gr’ with type: Char In the expression: _gr - In an equation for `g': g x = _gr + In an equation for ‛g’: g x = _gr holes3.hs:10:5: - Found hole `_aa' with type: [Char] - In the first argument of `(++)', namely `_aa' + Found hole ‛_aa’ with type: [Char] + In the first argument of ‛(++)’, namely ‛_aa’ In the expression: _aa ++ "a" - In an equation for `h': h = _aa ++ "a" + In an equation for ‛h’: h = _aa ++ "a" holes3.hs:13:15: - Found hole `_x' with type: b0 - Where: `b0' is an ambiguous type variable - In the second argument of `const', namely `_x' + Found hole ‛_x’ with type: b0 + Where: ‛b0’ is an ambiguous type variable + In the second argument of ‛const’, namely ‛_x’ In the expression: const y _x - In an equation for `z': z y = const y _x + In an equation for ‛z’: z y = const y _x diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc056.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc056.stderr index 786c88e804..c05f9b3bc2 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc056.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc056.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ -tc056.hs:16:10: - Warning: Duplicate constraint(s): Eq' a +tc056.hs:16:10: Warning: + Duplicate constraint(s): Eq' a In the context: (Eq' a, Eq' a) While checking an instance declaration - In the instance declaration for `Eq' [a]' + In the instance declaration for ‛Eq' [a]’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc115.stderr-ghc b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc115.stderr-ghc index 8b3997deb5..26c3747935 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc115.stderr-ghc +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc115.stderr-ghc @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -tc115.hs:12:10: - Warning: No explicit method or default declaration for `foo' - In the instance declaration for `Foo [m a] (m a)' +tc115.hs:12:10: Warning: + No explicit method or default declaration for ‛foo’ + In the instance declaration for ‛Foo [m a] (m a)’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc116.stderr-ghc b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc116.stderr-ghc index 5593928d28..cb1856bfcc 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc116.stderr-ghc +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc116.stderr-ghc @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -tc116.hs:12:10: - Warning: No explicit method or default declaration for `foo' - In the instance declaration for `Foo [m a] (m a)' +tc116.hs:12:10: Warning: + No explicit method or default declaration for ‛foo’ + In the instance declaration for ‛Foo [m a] (m a)’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc125.stderr-ghc b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc125.stderr-ghc index 2a2de4283d..0bbaf442d5 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc125.stderr-ghc +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc125.stderr-ghc @@ -1,20 +1,20 @@ -tc125.hs:16:10: - Warning: No explicit method or default declaration for `add' - In the instance declaration for `Add Z a a' +tc125.hs:16:10: Warning: + No explicit method or default declaration for ‛add’ + In the instance declaration for ‛Add Z a a’ -tc125.hs:17:10: - Warning: No explicit method or default declaration for `add' - In the instance declaration for `Add (S a) b (S c)' +tc125.hs:17:10: Warning: + No explicit method or default declaration for ‛add’ + In the instance declaration for ‛Add (S a) b (S c)’ -tc125.hs:21:10: - Warning: No explicit method or default declaration for `mul' - In the instance declaration for `Mul Z a Z' +tc125.hs:21:10: Warning: + No explicit method or default declaration for ‛mul’ + In the instance declaration for ‛Mul Z a Z’ -tc125.hs:22:10: - Warning: No explicit method or default declaration for `mul' - In the instance declaration for `Mul (S a) b d' +tc125.hs:22:10: Warning: + No explicit method or default declaration for ‛mul’ + In the instance declaration for ‛Mul (S a) b d’ -tc125.hs:29:10: - Warning: No explicit method or default declaration for `add' - In the instance declaration for `Add (Q a b) (Q c d) (Q ad_bc bd)' +tc125.hs:29:10: Warning: + No explicit method or default declaration for ‛add’ + In the instance declaration for ‛Add (Q a b) (Q c d) (Q ad_bc bd)’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc126.stderr-ghc b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc126.stderr-ghc index ee49f159f4..c4c41ea473 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc126.stderr-ghc +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc126.stderr-ghc @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ -tc126.hs:15:25: - Warning: No explicit method or default declaration for `bug' - In the instance declaration for `Bug (Int -> r) Int r' +tc126.hs:15:25: Warning: + No explicit method or default declaration for ‛bug’ + In the instance declaration for ‛Bug (Int -> r) Int r’ -tc126.hs:16:10: - Warning: No explicit method or default declaration for `bug' - In the instance declaration for `Bug f (c a) (c r)' +tc126.hs:16:10: Warning: + No explicit method or default declaration for ‛bug’ + In the instance declaration for ‛Bug f (c a) (c r)’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc141.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc141.stderr index e7d7f7cb1c..55aac9e943 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc141.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc141.stderr @@ -1,14 +1,14 @@ tc141.hs:11:12: - You cannot bind scoped type variable `a' + You cannot bind scoped type variable ‛a’ in a pattern binding signature In the pattern: p :: a In the pattern: (p :: a, q :: a) In a pattern binding: (p :: a, q :: a) = x tc141.hs:11:31: - Couldn't match expected type `a1' with actual type `a' - because type variable `a1' would escape its scope + Couldn't match expected type ‛a1’ with actual type ‛a’ + because type variable ‛a1’ would escape its scope This (rigid, skolem) type variable is bound by an expression type signature: a1 at tc141.hs:11:31-34 @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ tc141.hs:11:31: In the expression: let (p :: a, q :: a) = x in (q :: a, p) tc141.hs:13:13: - You cannot bind scoped type variable `a' + You cannot bind scoped type variable ‛a’ in a pattern binding signature In the pattern: y :: a In a pattern binding: y :: a = a @@ -34,8 +34,8 @@ tc141.hs:13:13: in v tc141.hs:15:18: - Couldn't match expected type `a2' with actual type `t' - because type variable `a2' would escape its scope + Couldn't match expected type ‛a2’ with actual type ‛t’ + because type variable ‛a2’ would escape its scope This (rigid, skolem) type variable is bound by the type signature for v :: a2 at tc141.hs:14:19 @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ tc141.hs:15:18: b :: t (bound at tc141.hs:13:5) v :: a2 (bound at tc141.hs:15:14) In the expression: b - In an equation for `v': v = b + In an equation for ‛v’: v = b In the expression: let v :: a diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc161.stderr-ghc b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc161.stderr-ghc index 57b0f60830..60b5b95d76 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc161.stderr-ghc +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc161.stderr-ghc @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -tc161.hs:17:10: - Warning: No explicit method or default declaration for `op' - In the instance declaration for `Foo Int' +tc161.hs:17:10: Warning: + No explicit method or default declaration for ‛op’ + In the instance declaration for ‛Foo Int’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc167.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc167.stderr index 7790d22677..51c982a276 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc167.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc167.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ tc167.hs:8:12: - Expecting a lifted type, but `Int#' is unlifted - In the type signature for `f': f :: ((->) Int#) Int# + Expecting a lifted type, but ‛Int#’ is unlifted + In the type signature for ‛f’: f :: ((->) Int#) Int# diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc168.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc168.stderr index 96fa5a0629..6fbc96f934 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc168.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc168.stderr @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ -
-tc168.hs:17:1:
- Could not deduce (C a1 (a, b0))
- arising from the ambiguity check for `g'
- from the context (C a1 (a, b))
- bound by the inferred type for `g': C a1 (a, b) => a1 -> a
- at tc168.hs:17:1-16
- The type variable `b0' is ambiguous
- When checking that `g'
- has the inferred type `forall a b a1. C a1 (a, b) => a1 -> a'
- Probable cause: the inferred type is ambiguous
+ +tc168.hs:17:1: + Could not deduce (C a1 (a, b0)) + arising from the ambiguity check for ‛g’ + from the context (C a1 (a, b)) + bound by the inferred type for ‛g’: C a1 (a, b) => a1 -> a + at tc168.hs:17:1-16 + The type variable ‛b0’ is ambiguous + When checking that ‛g’ + has the inferred type ‛forall a b a1. C a1 (a, b) => a1 -> a’ + Probable cause: the inferred type is ambiguous diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc211.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc211.stderr index 998cd76f5e..7538dedda8 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc211.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc211.stderr @@ -1,20 +1,20 @@ tc211.hs:15:22: - Couldn't match type `forall a6. a6 -> a6' with `a -> a' + Couldn't match type ‛forall a6. a6 -> a6’ with ‛a -> a’ Expected type: [a -> a] Actual type: [forall a. a -> a] - In the first argument of `head', namely `foo' - In the first argument of `(:) :: + In the first argument of ‛head’, namely ‛foo’ + In the first argument of ‛(:) :: (forall a. a -> a) - -> [forall a. a -> a] -> [forall a. a -> a]', namely - `(head foo)' + -> [forall a. a -> a] -> [forall a. a -> a]’, namely + ‛(head foo)’ In the expression: ((:) :: (forall a. a -> a) -> [forall a. a -> a] -> [forall a. a -> a]) (head foo) foo tc211.hs:70:9: - Couldn't match type `forall a7. a7 -> a7' with `a6 -> a6' + Couldn't match type ‛forall a7. a7 -> a7’ with ‛a6 -> a6’ Expected type: List (forall a. a -> a) -> (forall a. a -> a) -> a6 -> a6 Actual type: List (forall a. a -> a) @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ tc211.hs:70:9: List (forall a. a -> a) -> (forall a. a -> a) -> (forall a. a -> a)) xs1 (\ x -> x) - In an equation for `bar4': + In an equation for ‛bar4’: bar4 = (foo2 :: List (forall a. a -> a) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc254.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc254.stderr index b24224d709..a721c7e3b4 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc254.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_compile/tc254.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -tc254.hs:8:1: - Warning: No explicit associated type or default declaration for `Typ' - In the instance declaration for `Cls Int' +tc254.hs:8:1: Warning: + No explicit associated type or default declaration for ‛Typ’ + In the instance declaration for ‛Cls Int’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef01.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef01.stderr index 5d3a596d97..e342e900a6 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef01.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef01.stderr @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ AssocTyDef01.hs:9:10: - `OtherType' is not a (visible) associated type of class `Cls' + ‛OtherType’ is not a (visible) associated type of class ‛Cls’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef02.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef02.stderr index 2d1b439528..749e42c991 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef02.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef02.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ -
-AssocTyDef02.hs:6:10:
- Type indexes must match class instance head
- Found `[b]' but expected `a'
- In the type synonym instance default declaration for `Typ'
- In the class declaration for `Cls'
+ +AssocTyDef02.hs:6:10: + Type indexes must match class instance head + Found ‛[b]’ but expected ‛a’ + In the type synonym instance default declaration for ‛Typ’ + In the class declaration for ‛Cls’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef03.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef03.stderr index bd7fadfd8c..82e9b0f3a3 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef03.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef03.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -
-AssocTyDef03.hs:6:5:
- Wrong category of family instance; declaration was for a data type
- In the type instance declaration for `Typ'
- In the class declaration for `Cls'
+ +AssocTyDef03.hs:6:5: + Wrong category of family instance; declaration was for a data type + In the type instance declaration for ‛Typ’ + In the class declaration for ‛Cls’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef04.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef04.stderr index e02758b288..b03eb045e5 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef04.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef04.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -
-AssocTyDef04.hs:6:18:
- Expecting one more argument to `Maybe'
- Expected kind `*', but `Maybe' has kind `* -> *'
- In the type `Maybe'
- In the type instance declaration for `Typ'
- In the class declaration for `Cls'
+ +AssocTyDef04.hs:6:18: + Expecting one more argument to ‛Maybe’ + Expected kind ‛*’, but ‛Maybe’ has kind ‛* -> *’ + In the type ‛Maybe’ + In the type instance declaration for ‛Typ’ + In the class declaration for ‛Cls’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef05.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef05.stderr index 797c838913..401251e36a 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef05.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef05.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ AssocTyDef05.hs:6:10: Number of parameters must match family declaration; expected 1 - In the type instance declaration for `Typ' - In the class declaration for `Cls' + In the type instance declaration for ‛Typ’ + In the class declaration for ‛Cls’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef06.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef06.stderr index 6100ef2a90..91e92bdcae 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef06.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef06.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ AssocTyDef06.hs:6:10: Number of parameters must match family declaration; expected 1 - In the type instance declaration for `Typ' - In the class declaration for `Cls' + In the type instance declaration for ‛Typ’ + In the class declaration for ‛Cls’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef07.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef07.stderr index 4a4562d0e0..151f5a9b8f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef07.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef07.stderr @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ AssocTyDef07.hs:5:10: - `Typ' is not a (visible) associated type of class `Cls' + ‛Typ’ is not a (visible) associated type of class ‛Cls’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef08.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef08.stderr index c45132f994..97147c7dfd 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef08.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef08.stderr @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ AssocTyDef08.hs:4:10: - `Typ' is not a (visible) associated type of class `Cls' + ‛Typ’ is not a (visible) associated type of class ‛Cls’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef09.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef09.stderr index 053450c48e..3f8c113289 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef09.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/AssocTyDef09.stderr @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ AssocTyDef09.hs:8:10: - `OtherType' is not a (visible) associated type of class `Cls' + ‛OtherType’ is not a (visible) associated type of class ‛Cls’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/FDsFromGivens.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/FDsFromGivens.stderr index 60a334232e..893ec8ae12 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/FDsFromGivens.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/FDsFromGivens.stderr @@ -1,14 +1,14 @@ FDsFromGivens.hs:21:15: - Couldn't match type `Char' with `[a]' + Couldn't match type ‛Char’ with ‛[a]’ Relevant bindings include bar :: KCC -> a -> a (bound at FDsFromGivens.hs:21:1) When using functional dependencies to combine C Char Char, arising from a pattern with constructor KCC :: C Char Char => () -> KCC, - in an equation for `bar' + in an equation for ‛bar’ at FDsFromGivens.hs:21:6-10 - C Char [a], arising from a use of `f' at FDsFromGivens.hs:21:15 + C Char [a], arising from a use of ‛f’ at FDsFromGivens.hs:21:15 In the expression: f - In an equation for `bar': bar (KCC _) = f + In an equation for ‛bar’: bar (KCC _) = f diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/FailDueToGivenOverlapping.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/FailDueToGivenOverlapping.stderr index 1cf4e9f1cc..74e0bc7341 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/FailDueToGivenOverlapping.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/FailDueToGivenOverlapping.stderr @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ FailDueToGivenOverlapping.hs:27:9: - Overlapping instances for E [t0] arising from a use of `eop' + Overlapping instances for E [t0] arising from a use of ‛eop’ Matching givens (or their superclasses): (E [Int]) bound by the type signature for bar :: E [Int] => () -> () at FailDueToGivenOverlapping.hs:26:8-26 Matching instances: instance E [a] -- Defined at FailDueToGivenOverlapping.hs:21:10 - (The choice depends on the instantiation of `t0') + (The choice depends on the instantiation of ‛t0’) In the expression: eop [undefined] - In an equation for `bar': bar _ = eop [undefined] + In an equation for ‛bar’: bar _ = eop [undefined] diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/FrozenErrorTests.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/FrozenErrorTests.stderr index 5a36d7d54b..9857c9c9a7 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/FrozenErrorTests.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/FrozenErrorTests.stderr @@ -1,53 +1,53 @@ -
-FrozenErrorTests.hs:12:12:
- Couldn't match type `Int' with `Bool'
- Inaccessible code in
- a pattern with constructor
- MkT3 :: forall a. a ~ Bool => T a,
- in a case alternative
- In the pattern: MkT3
- In a case alternative: MkT3 -> ()
- In the expression: case x of { MkT3 -> () }
-
-FrozenErrorTests.hs:26:9:
- Occurs check: cannot construct the infinite type: a ~ [a]
- Expected type: [a]
- Actual type: F a Bool
- Relevant bindings include
- test1 :: a (bound at FrozenErrorTests.hs:26:1)
- In the expression: goo1 False undefined
- In an equation for `test1': test1 = goo1 False undefined
-
-FrozenErrorTests.hs:29:15:
- Couldn't match type `Int' with `[Int]'
- Expected type: [[Int]]
- Actual type: F [Int] Bool
- In the first argument of `goo2', namely `(goo1 False undefined)'
- In the expression: goo2 (goo1 False undefined)
- In an equation for `test2': test2 = goo2 (goo1 False undefined)
-
-FrozenErrorTests.hs:30:9:
- Couldn't match type `Int' with `[Int]'
- Expected type: [[Int]]
- Actual type: F [Int] Bool
- In the expression: goo1 False (goo2 undefined)
- In an equation for `test3': test3 = goo1 False (goo2 undefined)
-
-FrozenErrorTests.hs:45:15:
- Couldn't match type `T2 c c' with `M (T2 (T2 c c) c)'
- Expected type: T2 (M (T2 (T2 c c) c)) (T2 (T2 c c) c)
- Actual type: F (T2 (T2 c c) c) Bool
- Relevant bindings include
- test4 :: T2 (T2 c c) c (bound at FrozenErrorTests.hs:45:1)
- In the first argument of `goo4', namely `(goo3 False undefined)'
- In the expression: goo4 (goo3 False undefined)
- In an equation for `test4': test4 = goo4 (goo3 False undefined)
-
-FrozenErrorTests.hs:46:9:
- Couldn't match type `T2 c c' with `M (T2 (T2 c c) c)'
- Expected type: T2 (M (T2 (T2 c c) c)) (T2 (T2 c c) c)
- Actual type: F (T2 (T2 c c) c) Bool
- Relevant bindings include
- test5 :: T2 (T2 c c) c (bound at FrozenErrorTests.hs:46:1)
- In the expression: goo3 False (goo4 undefined)
- In an equation for `test5': test5 = goo3 False (goo4 undefined)
+ +FrozenErrorTests.hs:12:12: + Couldn't match type ‛Int’ with ‛Bool’ + Inaccessible code in + a pattern with constructor + MkT3 :: forall a. a ~ Bool => T a, + in a case alternative + In the pattern: MkT3 + In a case alternative: MkT3 -> () + In the expression: case x of { MkT3 -> () } + +FrozenErrorTests.hs:26:9: + Occurs check: cannot construct the infinite type: a ~ [a] + Expected type: [a] + Actual type: F a Bool + Relevant bindings include + test1 :: a (bound at FrozenErrorTests.hs:26:1) + In the expression: goo1 False undefined + In an equation for ‛test1’: test1 = goo1 False undefined + +FrozenErrorTests.hs:29:15: + Couldn't match type ‛Int’ with ‛[Int]’ + Expected type: [[Int]] + Actual type: F [Int] Bool + In the first argument of ‛goo2’, namely ‛(goo1 False undefined)’ + In the expression: goo2 (goo1 False undefined) + In an equation for ‛test2’: test2 = goo2 (goo1 False undefined) + +FrozenErrorTests.hs:30:9: + Couldn't match type ‛Int’ with ‛[Int]’ + Expected type: [[Int]] + Actual type: F [Int] Bool + In the expression: goo1 False (goo2 undefined) + In an equation for ‛test3’: test3 = goo1 False (goo2 undefined) + +FrozenErrorTests.hs:45:15: + Couldn't match type ‛T2 c c’ with ‛M (T2 (T2 c c) c)’ + Expected type: T2 (M (T2 (T2 c c) c)) (T2 (T2 c c) c) + Actual type: F (T2 (T2 c c) c) Bool + Relevant bindings include + test4 :: T2 (T2 c c) c (bound at FrozenErrorTests.hs:45:1) + In the first argument of ‛goo4’, namely ‛(goo3 False undefined)’ + In the expression: goo4 (goo3 False undefined) + In an equation for ‛test4’: test4 = goo4 (goo3 False undefined) + +FrozenErrorTests.hs:46:9: + Couldn't match type ‛T2 c c’ with ‛M (T2 (T2 c c) c)’ + Expected type: T2 (M (T2 (T2 c c) c)) (T2 (T2 c c) c) + Actual type: F (T2 (T2 c c) c) Bool + Relevant bindings include + test5 :: T2 (T2 c c) c (bound at FrozenErrorTests.hs:46:1) + In the expression: goo3 False (goo4 undefined) + In an equation for ‛test5’: test5 = goo3 False (goo4 undefined) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/IPFail.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/IPFail.stderr index d8efdfec56..127693a5ca 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/IPFail.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/IPFail.stderr @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ IPFail.hs:6:18: - Could not deduce (Num Bool) arising from the literal `5' + Could not deduce (Num Bool) arising from the literal ‛5’ from the context (?x::Int) bound by the type signature for f0 :: (?x::Int) => () -> Bool at IPFail.hs:5:7-31 In the expression: 5 In the expression: let ?x = 5 in ?x - In an equation for `f0': f0 () = let ?x = 5 in ?x + In an equation for ‛f0’: f0 () = let ?x = 5 in ?x diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/LongWayOverlapping.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/LongWayOverlapping.stderr index fbd0b44868..d50cc847dd 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/LongWayOverlapping.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/LongWayOverlapping.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ LongWayOverlapping.hs:23:11: No instance for (EmbAsChild [Char] Char) - arising from a use of `emb' + arising from a use of ‛emb’ In the expression: emb 'c' - In an equation for `emb': emb _ = emb 'c' - In the instance declaration for `EmbAsChild [Char] Bool' + In an equation for ‛emb’: emb _ = emb 'c' + In the instance declaration for ‛EmbAsChild [Char] Bool’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/SCLoop.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/SCLoop.stderr index 37970cc737..309dd91af0 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/SCLoop.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/SCLoop.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ SCLoop.hs:22:7: - No instance for (SC ()) arising from a use of `op' + No instance for (SC ()) arising from a use of ‛op’ In the expression: op () ([Just True]) - In an equation for `foo': foo = op () ([Just True]) + In an equation for ‛foo’: foo = op () ([Just True]) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/SilentParametersOverlapping.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/SilentParametersOverlapping.stderr index 6a49325e43..255e6513eb 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/SilentParametersOverlapping.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/SilentParametersOverlapping.stderr @@ -1,13 +1,13 @@ SilentParametersOverlapping.hs:15:9: - Overlapping instances for C [(t0, t1)] arising from a use of `c' + Overlapping instances for C [(t0, t1)] arising from a use of ‛c’ Matching givens (or their superclasses): (C [(a, b)]) bound by the instance declaration at SilentParametersOverlapping.hs:14:37-45 Matching instances: instance C [a] -- Defined at SilentParametersOverlapping.hs:11:10 - (The choice depends on the instantiation of `t0, t1') + (The choice depends on the instantiation of ‛t0, t1’) In the expression: c [(undefined, undefined)] - In an equation for `b': b x = c [(undefined, undefined)] - In the instance declaration for `B [(a, b)]' + In an equation for ‛b’: b x = c [(undefined, undefined)] + In the instance declaration for ‛B [(a, b)]’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T1595.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T1595.stderr index d3f665c15a..a84903ded7 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T1595.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T1595.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ T1595.hs:8:15: - Not in scope: type constructor or class `DoesNotExist' + Not in scope: type constructor or class ‛DoesNotExist’ T1595.hs:13:22: - Not in scope: type constructor or class `DoesNotExist' + Not in scope: type constructor or class ‛DoesNotExist’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T1633.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T1633.stderr index bdfa10ad59..8a01bd9fd6 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T1633.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T1633.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ T1633.hs:6:18: - The first argument of `Functor' should have kind `* -> *', - but `Bool' has kind `*' - In the instance declaration for `Functor Bool' + The first argument of ‛Functor’ should have kind ‛* -> *’, + but ‛Bool’ has kind ‛*’ + In the instance declaration for ‛Functor Bool’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T1897a.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T1897a.stderr index eb1204850f..b495f17b1c 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T1897a.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T1897a.stderr @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ -
-T1897a.hs:9:1:
- Could not deduce (Wob a0 b)
- arising from the ambiguity check for `foo'
- from the context (Wob a b)
- bound by the inferred type for `foo': Wob a b => b -> [b]
- at T1897a.hs:9:1-24
- The type variable `a0' is ambiguous
- When checking that `foo'
- has the inferred type `forall a b. Wob a b => b -> [b]'
- Probable cause: the inferred type is ambiguous
+ +T1897a.hs:9:1: + Could not deduce (Wob a0 b) + arising from the ambiguity check for ‛foo’ + from the context (Wob a b) + bound by the inferred type for ‛foo’: Wob a b => b -> [b] + at T1897a.hs:9:1-24 + The type variable ‛a0’ is ambiguous + When checking that ‛foo’ + has the inferred type ‛forall a b. Wob a b => b -> [b]’ + Probable cause: the inferred type is ambiguous diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T1899.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T1899.stderr index 0838984c2f..d637ac7a0a 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T1899.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T1899.stderr @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ T1899.hs:12:29: - Couldn't match expected type `a' with actual type `Proposition a0' - `a' is a rigid type variable bound by + Couldn't match expected type ‛a’ with actual type ‛Proposition a0’ + ‛a’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for transRHS :: [a] -> Int -> Constraint a at T1899.hs:9:14 Relevant bindings include transRHS :: [a] -> Int -> Constraint a (bound at T1899.hs:10:2) varSet :: [a] (bound at T1899.hs:10:11) - In the return type of a call of `Auxiliary' - In the first argument of `Prop', namely `(Auxiliary undefined)' + In the return type of a call of ‛Auxiliary’ + In the first argument of ‛Prop’, namely ‛(Auxiliary undefined)’ In the expression: Prop (Auxiliary undefined) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2126.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2126.stderr index 2facb189a9..1e0a72df2e 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2126.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2126.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ T2126.hs:5:1: - A newtype must have exactly one constructor, but `X' has none - In the newtype declaration for `X' + A newtype must have exactly one constructor, but ‛X’ has none + In the newtype declaration for ‛X’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2247.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2247.stderr index 70ef7f703e..15ec584482 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2247.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2247.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ T2247.hs:6:10: - Illegal instance declaration for `FD a b' + Illegal instance declaration for ‛FD a b’ Multiple uses of this instance may be inconsistent with the functional dependencies of the class. - In the instance declaration for `FD a b' + In the instance declaration for ‛FD a b’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2354.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2354.stderr index da21f79299..55285ffd12 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2354.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2354.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ T2354.hs:4:3: - The INLINE pragma for default method `toInt' lacks an accompanying binding + The INLINE pragma for default method ‛toInt’ lacks an accompanying binding T2354.hs:6:3: - The INLINE pragma for default method `fromInt' lacks an accompanying binding + The INLINE pragma for default method ‛fromInt’ lacks an accompanying binding diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2414.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2414.stderr index 53ea2b11e3..af968d90da 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2414.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2414.stderr @@ -3,6 +3,6 @@ T2414.hs:9:13: Occurs check: cannot construct the infinite type: b0 ~ (Bool, b0) Expected type: b0 -> Maybe (Bool, b0) Actual type: b0 -> Maybe b0 - In the first argument of `unfoldr', namely `Just' + In the first argument of ‛unfoldr’, namely ‛Just’ In the expression: unfoldr Just - In an equation for `f': f = unfoldr Just + In an equation for ‛f’: f = unfoldr Just diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2534.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2534.stderr index 02ad7821ff..389b515957 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2534.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2534.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ T2534.hs:3:19: - Couldn't match expected type `a -> a -> b' with actual type `[t0]' + Couldn't match expected type ‛a -> a -> b’ with actual type ‛[t0]’ Relevant bindings include foo :: a -> a -> b (bound at T2534.hs:3:1) - In the second argument of `foldr', namely `[]' + In the second argument of ‛foldr’, namely ‛[]’ In the expression: foldr (>>=) [] [] - In an equation for `foo': foo = foldr (>>=) [] [] + In an equation for ‛foo’: foo = foldr (>>=) [] [] diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2538.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2538.stderr index b2d1d3aeb6..2e67c878af 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2538.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2538.stderr @@ -2,13 +2,13 @@ T2538.hs:6:6: Illegal polymorphic or qualified type: Eq a => a -> a Perhaps you intended to use -XRankNTypes or -XRank2Types - In the type signature for `f': f :: (Eq a => a -> a) -> Int + In the type signature for ‛f’: f :: (Eq a => a -> a) -> Int T2538.hs:9:6: Illegal polymorphic or qualified type: Eq a => a -> a Perhaps you intended to use -XImpredicativeTypes - In the type signature for `g': g :: [Eq a => a -> a] -> Int + In the type signature for ‛g’: g :: [Eq a => a -> a] -> Int T2538.hs:12:6: Illegal polymorphic or qualified type: Eq a => a -> a - In the type signature for `h': h :: Ix (Eq a => a -> a) => Int + In the type signature for ‛h’: h :: Ix (Eq a => a -> a) => Int diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2688.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2688.stderr index 3bb0f49349..bbc415ad81 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2688.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2688.stderr @@ -2,16 +2,16 @@ T2688.hs:8:22: Could not deduce (s ~ v) from the context (VectorSpace v s) - bound by the class declaration for `VectorSpace' + bound by the class declaration for ‛VectorSpace’ at T2688.hs:(5,1)-(8,23) - `s' is a rigid type variable bound by - the class declaration for `VectorSpace' at T2688.hs:5:21 - `v' is a rigid type variable bound by - the class declaration for `VectorSpace' at T2688.hs:5:19 + ‛s’ is a rigid type variable bound by + the class declaration for ‛VectorSpace’ at T2688.hs:5:21 + ‛v’ is a rigid type variable bound by + the class declaration for ‛VectorSpace’ at T2688.hs:5:19 Relevant bindings include ^/ :: v -> s -> v (bound at T2688.hs:8:5) v :: v (bound at T2688.hs:8:5) s :: s (bound at T2688.hs:8:10) - In the second argument of `(/)', namely `s' - In the second argument of `(*^)', namely `(1 / s)' + In the second argument of ‛(/)’, namely ‛s’ + In the second argument of ‛(*^)’, namely ‛(1 / s)’ In the expression: v *^ (1 / s) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2714.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2714.stderr index 68056509c7..07adee2eee 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2714.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2714.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ T2714.hs:8:5: - Couldn't match type `c' with `f0 (a -> b)' - `c' is a rigid type variable bound by + Couldn't match type ‛c’ with ‛f0 (a -> b)’ + ‛c’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for f :: ((a -> b) -> b) -> c -> a at T2714.hs:8:1 Expected type: ((a -> b) -> b) -> c -> a @@ -9,11 +9,11 @@ T2714.hs:8:5: Relevant bindings include f :: ((a -> b) -> b) -> forall c. c -> a (bound at T2714.hs:8:1) In the expression: ffmap - In an equation for `f': f = ffmap + In an equation for ‛f’: f = ffmap T2714.hs:8:5: - Couldn't match type `a' with `f0 b' - `a' is a rigid type variable bound by + Couldn't match type ‛a’ with ‛f0 b’ + ‛a’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for f :: ((a -> b) -> b) -> forall c. c -> a at T2714.hs:7:6 Expected type: ((a -> b) -> b) -> c -> a @@ -21,4 +21,4 @@ T2714.hs:8:5: Relevant bindings include f :: ((a -> b) -> b) -> forall c. c -> a (bound at T2714.hs:8:1) In the expression: ffmap - In an equation for `f': f = ffmap + In an equation for ‛f’: f = ffmap diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2806.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2806.stderr index ebbffb29eb..da35b207dd 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2806.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2806.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ -T2806.hs:13:11: - Warning: Pattern bindings containing unlifted types should use an outermost bang pattern: - (I# _x) = 4 - In an equation for `foo': +T2806.hs:13:11: Warning: + Pattern bindings containing unlifted types should use an outermost bang pattern: + (I# _x) = 4 + In an equation for ‛foo’: foo = 3 where diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2846b.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2846b.stderr index b70c4d1a0d..23b6a6a0e2 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2846b.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2846b.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ T2846b.hs:5:5: - No instance for (Show (Num a0 => a0)) arising from a use of `show' + No instance for (Show (Num a0 => a0)) arising from a use of ‛show’ In the expression: show ([1, 2, 3] :: [Num a => a]) - In an equation for `f': f = show ([1, 2, 3] :: [Num a => a]) + In an equation for ‛f’: f = show ([1, 2, 3] :: [Num a => a]) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2994.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2994.stderr index 7c797afb75..2794cb2afc 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2994.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T2994.stderr @@ -1,16 +1,16 @@ T2994.hs:11:10: - Expecting one more argument to `MonadReader Int' + Expecting one more argument to ‛MonadReader Int’ Expected a constraint, - but `MonadReader Int' has kind `* -> Constraint' - In the instance declaration for `MonadReader Int' + but ‛MonadReader Int’ has kind ‛* -> Constraint’ + In the instance declaration for ‛MonadReader Int’ T2994.hs:13:23: - Expecting one more argument to `Reader' r' - The first argument of `MonadReader' should have kind `*', - but `Reader' r' has kind `* -> *' - In the instance declaration for `MonadReader (Reader' r)' + Expecting one more argument to ‛Reader' r’ + The first argument of ‛MonadReader’ should have kind ‛*’, + but ‛Reader' r’ has kind ‛* -> *’ + In the instance declaration for ‛MonadReader (Reader' r)’ T2994.hs:15:10: - `MonadReader' is applied to too many type arguments - In the instance declaration for `MonadReader r r (Reader' r)' + ‛MonadReader’ is applied to too many type arguments + In the instance declaration for ‛MonadReader r r (Reader' r)’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3102.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3102.stderr index 0cf9d52187..b3f69d3761 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3102.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3102.stderr @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ T3102.hs:11:12: - Couldn't match type `a' with `(?p::Int) => a0' - `a' is a rigid type variable bound by + Couldn't match type ‛a’ with ‛(?p::Int) => a0’ + ‛a’ is a rigid type variable bound by a type expected by the context: a -> String at T3102.hs:11:10 Expected type: a -> String Actual type: ((?p::Int) => a0) -> String - In the first argument of `f', namely `t' + In the first argument of ‛f’, namely ‛t’ In the expression: f t - In an equation for `result': result = f t + In an equation for ‛result’: result = f t diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3176.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3176.stderr index 393880367d..160eb4769e 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3176.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3176.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ T3176.hs:9:27: - Cannot use record selector `unES' as a function due to escaped type variables + Cannot use record selector ‛unES’ as a function due to escaped type variables Probable fix: use pattern-matching syntax instead In the expression: unES - In the second argument of `($)', namely `unES $ f t' + In the second argument of ‛($)’, namely ‛unES $ f t’ In the expression: show $ unES $ f t diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3323.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3323.stderr index d7c4c26681..029ef73578 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3323.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3323.stderr @@ -2,4 +2,4 @@ T3323.hs:18:7: Record update for insufficiently polymorphic field: haDevice :: dev In the expression: h {haDevice = undefined} - In an equation for `f': f h = h {haDevice = undefined} + In an equation for ‛f’: f h = h {haDevice = undefined} diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3406.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3406.stderr index ceba706f87..40779d4f2e 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3406.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3406.stderr @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ T3406.hs:11:6: - The type variables `a, b' - should be bound by the pattern signature `ItemColID a b' + The type variables ‛a, b’ + should be bound by the pattern signature ‛ItemColID a b’ but are actually discarded by a type synonym To fix this, expand the type synonym [Note: I hope to lift this restriction in due course] In the pattern: x :: ItemColID a b - In an equation for `get': + In an equation for ‛get’: get (x :: ItemColID a b) = x :: ItemColID a b diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3468.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3468.stderr index 1dcc3488ed..fa702d6d0f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3468.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3468.stderr @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ -
-T3468.hs-boot:3:6:
- Type constructor `Tool' has conflicting definitions in the module and its hs-boot file
- Main module: data Tool d
- No C type associated
- RecFlag Recursive, Promotable
- = F :: forall d a r. a -> Tool d Stricts: _
- FamilyInstance: none
- Boot file: abstract(False) Tool
- No C type associated
- RecFlag NonRecursive, Not promotable
- FamilyInstance: none
+ +T3468.hs-boot:3:6: + Type constructor ‛Tool’ has conflicting definitions in the module and its hs-boot file + Main module: data Tool d + No C type associated + RecFlag Recursive, Promotable + = F :: forall d a r. a -> Tool d Stricts: _ + FamilyInstance: none + Boot file: abstract(False) Tool + No C type associated + RecFlag NonRecursive, Not promotable + FamilyInstance: none diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3540.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3540.stderr index 83bcbf1f85..db84dcd62c 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3540.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3540.stderr @@ -1,20 +1,20 @@ T3540.hs:4:12: - Expected a type, but `a ~ Int' has kind `Constraint' - In the type signature for `thing': thing :: a ~ Int + Expected a type, but ‛a ~ Int’ has kind ‛Constraint’ + In the type signature for ‛thing’: thing :: a ~ Int T3540.hs:7:20: - Expected a type, but `a ~ Int' has kind `Constraint' - In the type signature for `thing1': thing1 :: Int -> (a ~ Int) + Expected a type, but ‛a ~ Int’ has kind ‛Constraint’ + In the type signature for ‛thing1’: thing1 :: Int -> (a ~ Int) T3540.hs:10:13: - Expected a type, but `a ~ Int' has kind `Constraint' - In the type signature for `thing2': thing2 :: (a ~ Int) -> Int + Expected a type, but ‛a ~ Int’ has kind ‛Constraint’ + In the type signature for ‛thing2’: thing2 :: (a ~ Int) -> Int T3540.hs:13:12: - Expected a type, but `?dude :: Int' has kind `Constraint' - In the type signature for `thing3': thing3 :: (?dude :: Int) -> Int + Expected a type, but ‛?dude :: Int’ has kind ‛Constraint’ + In the type signature for ‛thing3’: thing3 :: (?dude :: Int) -> Int T3540.hs:16:11: - Expected a type, but `Eq a' has kind `Constraint' - In the type signature for `thing4': thing4 :: (Eq a) -> Int + Expected a type, but ‛Eq a’ has kind ‛Constraint’ + In the type signature for ‛thing4’: thing4 :: (Eq a) -> Int diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3592.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3592.stderr index 08a02ce8a2..be59667e34 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3592.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3592.stderr @@ -1,13 +1,13 @@ T3592.hs:8:5: - No instance for (Show (T a)) arising from a use of `show' + No instance for (Show (T a)) arising from a use of ‛show’ In the expression: show - In an equation for `f': f = show + In an equation for ‛f’: f = show T3592.hs:11:7: - No instance for (Show a) arising from a use of `show' + No instance for (Show a) arising from a use of ‛show’ Possible fix: add (Show a) to the context of the type signature for g :: T a -> String In the expression: show x - In an equation for `g': g x = show x + In an equation for ‛g’: g x = show x diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3613.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3613.stderr index 1373b7143d..956e20cb76 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3613.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3613.stderr @@ -1,20 +1,20 @@ T3613.hs:14:20: - Couldn't match type `IO' with `Maybe' + Couldn't match type ‛IO’ with ‛Maybe’ Expected type: Maybe () Actual type: IO () - In the first argument of `(>>)', namely `bar' - In the first argument of `fooThen', namely `(bar >> undefined)' + In the first argument of ‛(>>)’, namely ‛bar’ + In the first argument of ‛fooThen’, namely ‛(bar >> undefined)’ In the expression: fooThen (bar >> undefined) T3613.hs:17:24: - Couldn't match type `IO' with `Maybe' + Couldn't match type ‛IO’ with ‛Maybe’ Expected type: Maybe () Actual type: IO () In a stmt of a 'do' block: bar - In the first argument of `fooThen', namely - `(do { bar; - undefined })' + In the first argument of ‛fooThen’, namely + ‛(do { bar; + undefined })’ In the expression: fooThen (do { bar; diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3966.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3966.stderr index ccbe467449..6e292b0887 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3966.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T3966.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ T3966.hs:5:16: Warning: - Ignoring unusable UNPACK pragma on the first argument of `Foo' - In the definition of data constructor `Foo' - In the data declaration for `Foo' + Ignoring unusable UNPACK pragma on the first argument of ‛Foo’ + In the definition of data constructor ‛Foo’ + In the data declaration for ‛Foo’ <no location info>: Failing due to -Werror. diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T4875.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T4875.stderr index 24c570e73b..ae88bdf976 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T4875.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T4875.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -
-T4875.hs:27:24:
- `r' is applied to too many type arguments
- In the type `r c -> [c]'
- In the class declaration for `Morphic'
+ +T4875.hs:27:24: + ‛r’ is applied to too many type arguments + In the type ‛r c -> [c]’ + In the class declaration for ‛Morphic’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5051.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5051.stderr index cebde5c29f..b15c2d9faf 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5051.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5051.stderr @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ T5051.hs:11:11: - Overlapping instances for Eq [a] arising from a use of `>=' + Overlapping instances for Eq [a] arising from a use of ‛>=’ Matching instances: - instance Eq a => Eq [a] -- Defined in `GHC.Classes' + instance Eq a => Eq [a] -- Defined in ‛GHC.Classes’ instance [overlap ok] Eq [T] -- Defined at T5051.hs:8:10 - (The choice depends on the instantiation of `a' + (The choice depends on the instantiation of ‛a’ To pick the first instance above, use -XIncoherentInstances when compiling the other instance declarations) In the expression: x >= x - In an equation for `foo': foo x = x >= x + In an equation for ‛foo’: foo x = x >= x diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5084.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5084.stderr index eba9426342..de9b4b1469 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5084.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5084.stderr @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ T5084.hs:6:5: - The INLINE pragma for default method `bar' lacks an accompanying binding + The INLINE pragma for default method ‛bar’ lacks an accompanying binding diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5095.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5095.stderr index 6ef994fdc6..166bc5e2cf 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5095.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5095.stderr @@ -1,64 +1,64 @@ T5095.hs:9:11: - Overlapping instances for Eq a arising from a use of `==' + Overlapping instances for Eq a arising from a use of ‛==’ Matching instances: instance [overlap ok] Show a => Eq a -- Defined at T5095.hs:5:10 - instance Eq a => Eq (GHC.Real.Ratio a) -- Defined in `GHC.Real' - instance Eq () -- Defined in `GHC.Classes' - instance (Eq a, Eq b) => Eq (a, b) -- Defined in `GHC.Classes' + instance Eq a => Eq (GHC.Real.Ratio a) -- Defined in ‛GHC.Real’ + instance Eq () -- Defined in ‛GHC.Classes’ + instance (Eq a, Eq b) => Eq (a, b) -- Defined in ‛GHC.Classes’ instance (Eq a, Eq b, Eq c) => Eq (a, b, c) - -- Defined in `GHC.Classes' + -- Defined in ‛GHC.Classes’ instance (Eq a, Eq b, Eq c, Eq d) => Eq (a, b, c, d) - -- Defined in `GHC.Classes' + -- Defined in ‛GHC.Classes’ instance (Eq a, Eq b, Eq c, Eq d, Eq e) => Eq (a, b, c, d, e) - -- Defined in `GHC.Classes' + -- Defined in ‛GHC.Classes’ instance (Eq a, Eq b, Eq c, Eq d, Eq e, Eq f) => Eq (a, b, c, d, e, f) - -- Defined in `GHC.Classes' + -- Defined in ‛GHC.Classes’ instance (Eq a, Eq b, Eq c, Eq d, Eq e, Eq f, Eq g) => Eq (a, b, c, d, e, f, g) - -- Defined in `GHC.Classes' + -- Defined in ‛GHC.Classes’ instance (Eq a, Eq b, Eq c, Eq d, Eq e, Eq f, Eq g, Eq h) => Eq (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h) - -- Defined in `GHC.Classes' + -- Defined in ‛GHC.Classes’ instance (Eq a, Eq b, Eq c, Eq d, Eq e, Eq f, Eq g, Eq h, Eq i) => Eq (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i) - -- Defined in `GHC.Classes' + -- Defined in ‛GHC.Classes’ instance (Eq a, Eq b, Eq c, Eq d, Eq e, Eq f, Eq g, Eq h, Eq i, Eq j) => Eq (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j) - -- Defined in `GHC.Classes' + -- Defined in ‛GHC.Classes’ instance (Eq a, Eq b, Eq c, Eq d, Eq e, Eq f, Eq g, Eq h, Eq i, Eq j, Eq k) => Eq (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k) - -- Defined in `GHC.Classes' + -- Defined in ‛GHC.Classes’ instance (Eq a, Eq b, Eq c, Eq d, Eq e, Eq f, Eq g, Eq h, Eq i, Eq j, Eq k, Eq l) => Eq (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l) - -- Defined in `GHC.Classes' + -- Defined in ‛GHC.Classes’ instance (Eq a, Eq b, Eq c, Eq d, Eq e, Eq f, Eq g, Eq h, Eq i, Eq j, Eq k, Eq l, Eq m) => Eq (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m) - -- Defined in `GHC.Classes' + -- Defined in ‛GHC.Classes’ instance (Eq a, Eq b, Eq c, Eq d, Eq e, Eq f, Eq g, Eq h, Eq i, Eq j, Eq k, Eq l, Eq m, Eq n) => Eq (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n) - -- Defined in `GHC.Classes' + -- Defined in ‛GHC.Classes’ instance (Eq a, Eq b, Eq c, Eq d, Eq e, Eq f, Eq g, Eq h, Eq i, Eq j, Eq k, Eq l, Eq m, Eq n, Eq o) => Eq (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o) - -- Defined in `GHC.Classes' - instance Eq Bool -- Defined in `GHC.Classes' - instance Eq Char -- Defined in `GHC.Classes' - instance Eq Double -- Defined in `GHC.Classes' - instance Eq Float -- Defined in `GHC.Classes' - instance Eq Int -- Defined in `GHC.Classes' - instance Eq Ordering -- Defined in `GHC.Classes' - instance Eq GHC.Types.Word -- Defined in `GHC.Classes' - instance Eq a => Eq [a] -- Defined in `GHC.Classes' - instance Eq Integer -- Defined in `integer-gmp:GHC.Integer.Type' - (The choice depends on the instantiation of `a' + -- Defined in ‛GHC.Classes’ + instance Eq Bool -- Defined in ‛GHC.Classes’ + instance Eq Char -- Defined in ‛GHC.Classes’ + instance Eq Double -- Defined in ‛GHC.Classes’ + instance Eq Float -- Defined in ‛GHC.Classes’ + instance Eq Int -- Defined in ‛GHC.Classes’ + instance Eq Ordering -- Defined in ‛GHC.Classes’ + instance Eq GHC.Types.Word -- Defined in ‛GHC.Classes’ + instance Eq a => Eq [a] -- Defined in ‛GHC.Classes’ + instance Eq Integer -- Defined in ‛integer-gmp:GHC.Integer.Type’ + (The choice depends on the instantiation of ‛a’ To pick the first instance above, use -XIncoherentInstances when compiling the other instance declarations) In the expression: x == y - In an equation for `f': f x y = x == y + In an equation for ‛f’: f x y = x == y diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5236.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5236.stderr index 74e4606993..b2de3de8d6 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5236.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5236.stderr @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ -
-T5236.hs:13:9:
- Couldn't match type `A' with `B'
- When using functional dependencies to combine
- Id A A,
- arising from the dependency `a -> b'
- in the instance declaration at T5236.hs:10:10
- Id A B,
- arising from the type signature for loop :: Id A B => Bool
- at T5236.hs:13:9-22
- In the ambiguity check for: Id A B => Bool
- In the type signature for `loop': loop :: Id A B => Bool
+ +T5236.hs:13:9: + Couldn't match type ‛A’ with ‛B’ + When using functional dependencies to combine + Id A A, + arising from the dependency ‛a -> b’ + in the instance declaration at T5236.hs:10:10 + Id A B, + arising from the type signature for loop :: Id A B => Bool + at T5236.hs:13:9-22 + In the ambiguity check for: Id A B => Bool + In the type signature for ‛loop’: loop :: Id A B => Bool diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5246.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5246.stderr index b37fbf3ebe..f494a4c5b7 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5246.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5246.stderr @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ T5246.hs:11:10: - Couldn't match type `[Char]' with `Int' + Couldn't match type ‛[Char]’ with ‛Int’ When using functional dependencies to combine ?x::[Char], arising from the implicit-parameter bindings for ?x at T5246.hs:(10,7)-(11,12) - ?x::Int, arising from a use of `foo' at T5246.hs:11:10-12 + ?x::Int, arising from a use of ‛foo’ at T5246.hs:11:10-12 In the expression: foo In the expression: let ?x = "hello" in foo diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5300.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5300.stderr index 749bd22b2f..f2652fcbbd 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5300.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5300.stderr @@ -1,32 +1,32 @@ -
-T5300.hs:11:7:
- Could not deduce (C1 a b c0)
- arising from the ambiguity check for `f1'
- from the context (Monad m, C1 a b c)
- bound by the type signature for
- f1 :: (Monad m, C1 a b c) => a -> StateT (T b) m a
- at T5300.hs:11:7-50
- The type variable `c0' is ambiguous
- In the ambiguity check for:
- forall a b (m :: * -> *) c.
- (Monad m, C1 a b c) =>
- a -> StateT (T b) m a
- In the type signature for `f1':
- f1 :: (Monad m, C1 a b c) => a -> StateT (T b) m a
-
-T5300.hs:14:7:
- Could not deduce (C1 a1 b1 c10)
- arising from the ambiguity check for `f2'
- from the context (Monad m, C1 a1 b1 c1, C2 a2 b2 c2)
- bound by the type signature for
- f2 :: (Monad m, C1 a1 b1 c1, C2 a2 b2 c2) =>
- a1 -> StateT (T b2) m a2
- at T5300.hs:14:7-69
- The type variable `c10' is ambiguous
- In the ambiguity check for:
- forall a1 b2 (m :: * -> *) a2 b1 c1 c2.
- (Monad m, C1 a1 b1 c1, C2 a2 b2 c2) =>
- a1 -> StateT (T b2) m a2
- In the type signature for `f2':
- f2 :: (Monad m, C1 a1 b1 c1, C2 a2 b2 c2) =>
- a1 -> StateT (T b2) m a2
+ +T5300.hs:11:7: + Could not deduce (C1 a b c0) + arising from the ambiguity check for ‛f1’ + from the context (Monad m, C1 a b c) + bound by the type signature for + f1 :: (Monad m, C1 a b c) => a -> StateT (T b) m a + at T5300.hs:11:7-50 + The type variable ‛c0’ is ambiguous + In the ambiguity check for: + forall a b (m :: * -> *) c. + (Monad m, C1 a b c) => + a -> StateT (T b) m a + In the type signature for ‛f1’: + f1 :: (Monad m, C1 a b c) => a -> StateT (T b) m a + +T5300.hs:14:7: + Could not deduce (C1 a1 b1 c10) + arising from the ambiguity check for ‛f2’ + from the context (Monad m, C1 a1 b1 c1, C2 a2 b2 c2) + bound by the type signature for + f2 :: (Monad m, C1 a1 b1 c1, C2 a2 b2 c2) => + a1 -> StateT (T b2) m a2 + at T5300.hs:14:7-69 + The type variable ‛c10’ is ambiguous + In the ambiguity check for: + forall a1 b2 (m :: * -> *) a2 b1 c1 c2. + (Monad m, C1 a1 b1 c1, C2 a2 b2 c2) => + a1 -> StateT (T b2) m a2 + In the type signature for ‛f2’: + f2 :: (Monad m, C1 a1 b1 c1, C2 a2 b2 c2) => + a1 -> StateT (T b2) m a2 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5570.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5570.stderr index d45eec581d..90f9155afa 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5570.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5570.stderr @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ -
-T5570.hs:7:16:
- Couldn't match kind `*' with `#'
- When matching types
- s0 :: *
- Double# :: #
- In the second argument of `($)', namely `D# $ 3.0##'
- In the expression: print $ D# $ 3.0##
- In an equation for `main': main = print $ D# $ 3.0##
+ +T5570.hs:7:16: + Couldn't match kind ‛*’ with ‛#’ + When matching types + s0 :: * + Double# :: # + In the second argument of ‛($)’, namely ‛D# $ 3.0##’ + In the expression: print $ D# $ 3.0## + In an equation for ‛main’: main = print $ D# $ 3.0## diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5684.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5684.stderr index a94aa88342..f3534f506d 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5684.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5684.stderr @@ -1,64 +1,64 @@ T5684.hs:25:12: - No instance for (A b6) arising from a use of `op' + No instance for (A b6) arising from a use of ‛op’ In the expression: op True undefined In the expression: [op False False, op 'c' undefined, op True undefined] - In an equation for `flop1': + In an equation for ‛flop1’: flop1 = [op False False, op 'c' undefined, op True undefined] T5684.hs:30:12: - No instance for (A b5) arising from a use of `op' + No instance for (A b5) arising from a use of ‛op’ In the expression: op True undefined In the expression: [op False False, op True undefined, op 'c' undefined] - In an equation for `flop2': + In an equation for ‛flop2’: flop2 = [op False False, op True undefined, op 'c' undefined] T5684.hs:36:12: - No instance for (A b4) arising from a use of `op' + No instance for (A b4) arising from a use of ‛op’ In the expression: op True undefined In the expression: [op 'c' undefined, op True undefined, op False False] - In an equation for `flop3': + In an equation for ‛flop3’: flop3 = [op 'c' undefined, op True undefined, op False False] T5684.hs:42:12: - No instance for (A b3) arising from a use of `op' + No instance for (A b3) arising from a use of ‛op’ In the expression: op True undefined In the expression: [op 'c' undefined, op False False, op True undefined] - In an equation for `flop4': + In an equation for ‛flop4’: flop4 = [op 'c' undefined, op False False, op True undefined] T5684.hs:46:12: - No instance for (A b2) arising from a use of `op' + No instance for (A b2) arising from a use of ‛op’ In the expression: op True undefined In the expression: [op True undefined, op 'c' undefined, op False False] - In an equation for `flop5': + In an equation for ‛flop5’: flop5 = [op True undefined, op 'c' undefined, op False False] T5684.hs:52:12: - No instance for (A b0) arising from a use of `op' + No instance for (A b0) arising from a use of ‛op’ In the expression: op True undefined In the expression: [op True undefined, op False False, op 'c' undefined] - In an equation for `flop6': + In an equation for ‛flop6’: flop6 = [op True undefined, op False False, op 'c' undefined] T5684.hs:53:12: - No instance for (A Bool) arising from a use of `op' + No instance for (A Bool) arising from a use of ‛op’ In the expression: op False False In the expression: [op True undefined, op False False, op 'c' undefined] - In an equation for `flop6': + In an equation for ‛flop6’: flop6 = [op True undefined, op False False, op 'c' undefined] T5684.hs:54:12: - No instance for (B Char b1) arising from a use of `op' + No instance for (B Char b1) arising from a use of ‛op’ In the expression: op 'c' undefined In the expression: [op True undefined, op False False, op 'c' undefined] - In an equation for `flop6': + In an equation for ‛flop6’: flop6 = [op True undefined, op False False, op 'c' undefined] diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5689.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5689.stderr index 4bd1210784..6fb1f222d6 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5689.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5689.stderr @@ -1,39 +1,39 @@ -
-T5689.hs:10:36:
- Couldn't match expected type `Bool' with actual type `t'
- Relevant bindings include
- r :: IORef (t -> t) (bound at T5689.hs:7:14)
- v :: t (bound at T5689.hs:10:28)
- In the expression: v
- In the expression: if v then False else True
- In the second argument of `writeIORef', namely
- `(\ v -> if v then False else True)'
-
-T5689.hs:10:43:
- Couldn't match expected type `t' with actual type `Bool'
- Relevant bindings include
- r :: IORef (t -> t) (bound at T5689.hs:7:14)
- v :: t (bound at T5689.hs:10:28)
- In the expression: False
- In the expression: if v then False else True
- In the second argument of `writeIORef', namely
- `(\ v -> if v then False else True)'
-
-T5689.hs:10:54:
- Couldn't match expected type `t' with actual type `Bool'
- Relevant bindings include
- r :: IORef (t -> t) (bound at T5689.hs:7:14)
- v :: t (bound at T5689.hs:10:28)
- In the expression: True
- In the expression: if v then False else True
- In the second argument of `writeIORef', namely
- `(\ v -> if v then False else True)'
-
-T5689.hs:14:23:
- Couldn't match expected type `t' with actual type `Bool'
- Relevant bindings include
- r :: IORef (t -> t) (bound at T5689.hs:7:14)
- c :: t -> t (bound at T5689.hs:12:13)
- In the first argument of `c', namely `True'
- In the second argument of `($)', namely `c True'
- In a stmt of a 'do' block: print $ c True
+ +T5689.hs:10:36: + Couldn't match expected type ‛Bool’ with actual type ‛t’ + Relevant bindings include + r :: IORef (t -> t) (bound at T5689.hs:7:14) + v :: t (bound at T5689.hs:10:28) + In the expression: v + In the expression: if v then False else True + In the second argument of ‛writeIORef’, namely + ‛(\ v -> if v then False else True)’ + +T5689.hs:10:43: + Couldn't match expected type ‛t’ with actual type ‛Bool’ + Relevant bindings include + r :: IORef (t -> t) (bound at T5689.hs:7:14) + v :: t (bound at T5689.hs:10:28) + In the expression: False + In the expression: if v then False else True + In the second argument of ‛writeIORef’, namely + ‛(\ v -> if v then False else True)’ + +T5689.hs:10:54: + Couldn't match expected type ‛t’ with actual type ‛Bool’ + Relevant bindings include + r :: IORef (t -> t) (bound at T5689.hs:7:14) + v :: t (bound at T5689.hs:10:28) + In the expression: True + In the expression: if v then False else True + In the second argument of ‛writeIORef’, namely + ‛(\ v -> if v then False else True)’ + +T5689.hs:14:23: + Couldn't match expected type ‛t’ with actual type ‛Bool’ + Relevant bindings include + r :: IORef (t -> t) (bound at T5689.hs:7:14) + c :: t -> t (bound at T5689.hs:12:13) + In the first argument of ‛c’, namely ‛True’ + In the second argument of ‛($)’, namely ‛c True’ + In a stmt of a 'do' block: print $ c True diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5691.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5691.stderr index fc517c2d48..4b5676374c 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5691.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5691.stderr @@ -1,17 +1,17 @@ -
-T5691.hs:14:9:
- Couldn't match type `p' with `PrintRuleInterp'
- Expected type: PrintRuleInterp a
- Actual type: p a
- In the pattern: f :: p a
- In an equation for `test': test (f :: p a) = MkPRI $ printRule_ f
- In the instance declaration for `Test PrintRuleInterp'
-
-T5691.hs:15:24:
- Couldn't match type `p' with `PrintRuleInterp'
- Expected type: PrintRuleInterp a
- Actual type: p a
- Relevant bindings include f :: p a (bound at T5691.hs:14:9)
- In the first argument of `printRule_', namely `f'
- In the second argument of `($)', namely `printRule_ f'
- In the expression: MkPRI $ printRule_ f
+ +T5691.hs:14:9: + Couldn't match type ‛p’ with ‛PrintRuleInterp’ + Expected type: PrintRuleInterp a + Actual type: p a + In the pattern: f :: p a + In an equation for ‛test’: test (f :: p a) = MkPRI $ printRule_ f + In the instance declaration for ‛Test PrintRuleInterp’ + +T5691.hs:15:24: + Couldn't match type ‛p’ with ‛PrintRuleInterp’ + Expected type: PrintRuleInterp a + Actual type: p a + Relevant bindings include f :: p a (bound at T5691.hs:14:9) + In the first argument of ‛printRule_’, namely ‛f’ + In the second argument of ‛($)’, namely ‛printRule_ f’ + In the expression: MkPRI $ printRule_ f diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5853.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5853.stderr index c36d64e84d..4fdef8cdd7 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5853.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5853.stderr @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ T5853.hs:15:52: Elem (Subst fa a) ~ a, Subst (Subst fa a) (Elem fa) ~ fa) bound by the RULE "map/map" at T5853.hs:15:2-57 - NB: `Subst' is a type function, and may not be injective + NB: ‛Subst’ is a type function, and may not be injective Relevant bindings include xs :: Subst fa a (bound at T5853.hs:15:23) g :: a -> Elem fa (bound at T5853.hs:15:21) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5858.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5858.stderr index 437b5baca6..893fd1a62b 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5858.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5858.stderr @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ T5858.hs:11:7: No instance for (InferOverloaded ([t0], [t1])) - arising from a use of `infer' - The type variables `t0', `t1' are ambiguous + arising from a use of ‛infer’ + The type variables ‛t0’, ‛t1’ are ambiguous Note: there is a potential instance available: instance t1 ~ String => InferOverloaded (t1, t1) -- Defined at T5858.hs:8:10 In the expression: infer ([], []) - In an equation for `foo': foo = infer ([], []) + In an equation for ‛foo’: foo = infer ([], []) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5957.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5957.stderr index c0bc12a7a2..f4300b0633 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5957.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5957.stderr @@ -2,5 +2,5 @@ T5957.hs:3:9: Illegal polymorphic or qualified type: Show a => a -> String Perhaps you intended to use -XRankNTypes or -XRank2Types - In the type signature for `flex': + In the type signature for ‛flex’: flex :: Int -> Show a => a -> String diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5978.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5978.stderr index 9edfde0721..e07acd49b1 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5978.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T5978.stderr @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ -
-T5978.hs:22:11:
- Couldn't match type `Bool' with `Char'
- When using functional dependencies to combine
- C Double Bool,
- arising from the dependency `from -> to'
- in the instance declaration at T5978.hs:8:10
- C Double Char, arising from a use of `polyBar' at T5978.hs:22:11-17
- In the expression: polyBar id monoFoo
- In an equation for `monoBar': monoBar = polyBar id monoFoo
+ +T5978.hs:22:11: + Couldn't match type ‛Bool’ with ‛Char’ + When using functional dependencies to combine + C Double Bool, + arising from the dependency ‛from -> to’ + in the instance declaration at T5978.hs:8:10 + C Double Char, arising from a use of ‛polyBar’ at T5978.hs:22:11-17 + In the expression: polyBar id monoFoo + In an equation for ‛monoBar’: monoBar = polyBar id monoFoo diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T6001.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T6001.stderr index 7fe591d54f..b1ef88d9fb 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T6001.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T6001.stderr @@ -2,4 +2,4 @@ T6001.hs:8:18: Method signature does not match class; it should be fromInteger :: Integer -> DayKind - In the instance declaration for `Num DayKind' + In the instance declaration for ‛Num DayKind’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T6069.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T6069.stderr index b6ce7799bd..750dcbc540 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T6069.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T6069.stderr @@ -1,24 +1,24 @@ T6069.hs:13:15: - Couldn't match type `ST s0 Int' with `forall s. ST s b0' + Couldn't match type ‛ST s0 Int’ with ‛forall s. ST s b0’ Expected type: ST s0 Int -> b0 Actual type: (forall s. ST s b0) -> b0 - In the second argument of `(.)', namely `runST' + In the second argument of ‛(.)’, namely ‛runST’ In the expression: print . runST In the expression: (print . runST) fourty_two T6069.hs:14:15: - Couldn't match type `ST s1 Int' with `forall s. ST s b1' + Couldn't match type ‛ST s1 Int’ with ‛forall s. ST s b1’ Expected type: ST s1 Int -> b1 Actual type: (forall s. ST s b1) -> b1 - In the second argument of `(.)', namely `runST' + In the second argument of ‛(.)’, namely ‛runST’ In the expression: (print . runST) In the expression: (print . runST) $ fourty_two T6069.hs:15:16: - Couldn't match type `ST s2 Int' with `forall s. ST s b2' + Couldn't match type ‛ST s2 Int’ with ‛forall s. ST s b2’ Expected type: ST s2 Int -> b2 Actual type: (forall s. ST s b2) -> b2 - In the second argument of `(.)', namely `runST' - In the first argument of `($)', namely `(print . runST)' + In the second argument of ‛(.)’, namely ‛runST’ + In the first argument of ‛($)’, namely ‛(print . runST)’ In the expression: (print . runST) $ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T6078.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T6078.stderr index 7690ecd9c6..32e3e056d3 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T6078.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T6078.stderr @@ -7,5 +7,5 @@ T6078.hs:8:10: let ip1p@(Ptr ip1) = Ptr ip0 `plusPtr` len in ip1p In the expression: \ fpbuf ip0 ipe s0 -> let ip1p@(Ptr ip1) = ... in ip1p - In an equation for `byteStringSlice': + In an equation for ‛byteStringSlice’: byteStringSlice len = \ fpbuf ip0 ipe s0 -> let ... in ip1p diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T6161.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T6161.stderr index 089da39f20..afc3a946f8 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T6161.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T6161.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ T6161.hs:29:12: - No instance for (Super (Fam Float)) arising from a use of `testDup' + No instance for (Super (Fam Float)) arising from a use of ‛testDup’ In the expression: testDup (FamFloat 3.0) - In an equation for `testProg': testProg = testDup (FamFloat 3.0) + In an equation for ‛testProg’: testProg = testDup (FamFloat 3.0) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7019.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7019.stderr index 43f1fe5209..935c3be522 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7019.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7019.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ T7019.hs:14:10: - Malformed predicate `C c' + Malformed predicate ‛C c’ In the context: (C c) While checking an instance declaration - In the instance declaration for `Monad (Free c)' + In the instance declaration for ‛Monad (Free c)’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7019a.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7019a.stderr index 2859f716b6..cd474af8a6 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7019a.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7019a.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ T7019a.hs:11:1: - Malformed predicate `forall b. Context (Associated a b)' + Malformed predicate ‛forall b. Context (Associated a b)’ In the context: (forall b. Context (Associated a b)) - While checking the super-classes of class `Class' - In the class declaration for `Class' + While checking the super-classes of class ‛Class’ + In the class declaration for ‛Class’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7175.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7175.stderr index 92272b6b36..e65918c22b 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7175.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7175.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ T7175.hs:8:4: - Data constructor `G1C' returns type `F Int' - instead of an instance of its parent type `G1 a' - In the definition of data constructor `G1C' - In the data declaration for `G1' + Data constructor ‛G1C’ returns type ‛F Int’ + instead of an instance of its parent type ‛G1 a’ + In the definition of data constructor ‛G1C’ + In the data declaration for ‛G1’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7210.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7210.stderr index d0fbf382cb..148f9bcd5e 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7210.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7210.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ T7210.hs:5:19: Unexpected strictness annotation: !IntMap - In the type `!IntMap Int' - In the definition of data constructor `C' - In the data declaration for `T' + In the type ‛!IntMap Int’ + In the definition of data constructor ‛C’ + In the data declaration for ‛T’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7220.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7220.stderr index 50860145d1..d57e06843e 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7220.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7220.stderr @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ T7220.hs:24:6: - Cannot instantiate unification variable `b0' + Cannot instantiate unification variable ‛b0’ with a type involving foralls: forall b. (C A b, TF b ~ Y) => b Perhaps you want -XImpredicativeTypes In the expression: f :: (forall b. (C A b, TF b ~ Y) => b) -> X In the expression: (f :: (forall b. (C A b, TF b ~ Y) => b) -> X) u - In an equation for `v': + In an equation for ‛v’: v = (f :: (forall b. (C A b, TF b ~ Y) => b) -> X) u diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7264.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7264.stderr index 31cc1dfbe5..3c0c068afd 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7264.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7264.stderr @@ -1,13 +1,13 @@ T7264.hs:13:19: - Couldn't match type `a' with `forall r. r -> String' - `a' is a rigid type variable bound by + Couldn't match type ‛a’ with ‛forall r. r -> String’ + ‛a’ is a rigid type variable bound by the inferred type of mkFoo2 :: a -> Maybe Foo at T7264.hs:13:1 Expected type: a -> Foo Actual type: (forall r. r -> String) -> Foo Relevant bindings include mkFoo2 :: a -> Maybe Foo (bound at T7264.hs:13:1) val :: a (bound at T7264.hs:13:8) - In the first argument of `mmap', namely `Foo' + In the first argument of ‛mmap’, namely ‛Foo’ In the expression: mmap Foo (Just val) - In an equation for `mkFoo2': mkFoo2 val = mmap Foo (Just val) + In an equation for ‛mkFoo2’: mkFoo2 val = mmap Foo (Just val) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7279.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7279.stderr index 6af478e52f..52793544c2 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7279.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7279.stderr @@ -5,6 +5,6 @@ T7279.hs:6:10: from the context (Eq a, Show b) bound by an instance declaration: (Eq a, Show b) => Eq (T a) at T7279.hs:6:10-35 - The type variable `b0' is ambiguous + The type variable ‛b0’ is ambiguous In the ambiguity check for: forall a b. (Eq a, Show b) => Eq (T a) - In the instance declaration for `Eq (T a)' + In the instance declaration for ‛Eq (T a)’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7368.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7368.stderr index e189c8907d..8f1f478b94 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7368.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7368.stderr @@ -1,20 +1,20 @@ T7368.hs:3:10: - Couldn't match kind `* -> *' with `*' + Couldn't match kind ‛* -> *’ with ‛*’ When matching types c0 :: (* -> *) -> * (->) a0 :: * -> * Expected type: a0 -> b0 Actual type: c0 b1 - In the return type of a call of `l' - Probable cause: `l' is applied to too many arguments - In the first argument of `b', namely `(l ())' + In the return type of a call of ‛l’ + Probable cause: ‛l’ is applied to too many arguments + In the first argument of ‛b’, namely ‛(l ())’ In the expression: b (l ()) T7368.hs:3:13: - Couldn't match type `()' with `b0 a1' + Couldn't match type ‛()’ with ‛b0 a1’ Expected type: b1 a1 Actual type: () - In the first argument of `l', namely `()' - In the first argument of `b', namely `(l ())' + In the first argument of ‛l’, namely ‛()’ + In the first argument of ‛b’, namely ‛(l ())’ In the expression: b (l ()) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7368a.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7368a.stderr index db0f69fbac..bc193cab05 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7368a.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7368a.stderr @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ -
-T7368a.hs:8:6:
- Couldn't match kind `*' with `* -> *'
- When matching types
- f :: * -> *
- Bad :: (* -> *) -> *
- Expected type: f (Bad f)
- Actual type: Bad t0
- In the pattern: Bad x
- In an equation for `fun': fun (Bad x) = True
+ +T7368a.hs:8:6: + Couldn't match kind ‛*’ with ‛* -> *’ + When matching types + f :: * -> * + Bad :: (* -> *) -> * + Expected type: f (Bad f) + Actual type: Bad t0 + In the pattern: Bad x + In an equation for ‛fun’: fun (Bad x) = True diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7410.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7410.stderr index 8052651466..877377e1b0 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7410.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7410.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ T7410.hs:3:9: - Expecting one more argument to `Either Int' - The first argument of a tuple should have kind `*', - but `Either Int' has kind `* -> *' - In the type signature for `foo': foo :: (Either Int, Int) + Expecting one more argument to ‛Either Int’ + The first argument of a tuple should have kind ‛*’, + but ‛Either Int’ has kind ‛* -> *’ + In the type signature for ‛foo’: foo :: (Either Int, Int) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7453.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7453.stderr index af88fef120..4a95105f44 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7453.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7453.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ T7453.hs:10:30: - Couldn't match expected type `t1' with actual type `t' - because type variable `t1' would escape its scope + Couldn't match expected type ‛t1’ with actual type ‛t’ + because type variable ‛t1’ would escape its scope This (rigid, skolem) type variable is bound by the type signature for z :: Id t1 at T7453.hs:8:16-19 @@ -10,13 +10,13 @@ T7453.hs:10:30: v :: t (bound at T7453.hs:7:7) z :: Id t1 (bound at T7453.hs:9:11) aux :: Id t1 (bound at T7453.hs:10:21) - In the first argument of `Id', namely `v' + In the first argument of ‛Id’, namely ‛v’ In the expression: Id v - In an equation for `aux': aux = Id v + In an equation for ‛aux’: aux = Id v T7453.hs:16:33: - Couldn't match expected type `t2' with actual type `t' - because type variable `t2' would escape its scope + Couldn't match expected type ‛t2’ with actual type ‛t’ + because type variable ‛t2’ would escape its scope This (rigid, skolem) type variable is bound by the type signature for z :: () -> t2 at T7453.hs:14:16-22 @@ -25,13 +25,13 @@ T7453.hs:16:33: v :: t (bound at T7453.hs:13:7) z :: () -> t2 (bound at T7453.hs:15:11) aux :: b -> t2 (bound at T7453.hs:16:21) - In the first argument of `const', namely `v' + In the first argument of ‛const’, namely ‛v’ In the expression: const v - In an equation for `aux': aux = const v + In an equation for ‛aux’: aux = const v T7453.hs:21:15: - Couldn't match expected type `t2' with actual type `t' - because type variable `t2' would escape its scope + Couldn't match expected type ‛t2’ with actual type ‛t’ + because type variable ‛t2’ would escape its scope This (rigid, skolem) type variable is bound by the type signature for z :: t2 at T7453.hs:20:16 @@ -41,11 +41,11 @@ T7453.hs:21:15: z :: t2 (bound at T7453.hs:21:11) aux :: forall b. b -> t2 (bound at T7453.hs:22:21) In the expression: v - In an equation for `z': + In an equation for ‛z’: z = v where aux = const v - In an equation for `cast3': + In an equation for ‛cast3’: cast3 v = z where diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7525.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7525.stderr index 032de67df7..1e2c0eb235 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7525.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7525.stderr @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ T7525.hs:5:30: Could not deduce (?b::Bool) - arising from a use of implicit parameter `?b' + arising from a use of implicit parameter ‛?b’ from the context (?a::Bool) bound by the implicit-parameter bindings for ?a at T7525.hs:5:7-31 - In the second argument of `(&&)', namely `?b' + In the second argument of ‛(&&)’, namely ‛?b’ In the expression: ?a && ?b In the expression: let ?a = True in ?a && ?b diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7545.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7545.stderr index 1b6a3370d2..dc661dae73 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7545.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7545.stderr @@ -2,4 +2,4 @@ T7545.hs:8:9: Method signature does not match class; it should be f :: forall b1. (a -> b) -> b1 - In the instance declaration for `C (a -> b)' + In the instance declaration for ‛C (a -> b)’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7609.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7609.stderr index 1431bcb7c2..650329a298 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7609.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7609.stderr @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ T7609.hs:7:16: - Expecting one more argument to `Maybe' - The second argument of a tuple should have kind `*', - but `Maybe' has kind `* -> *' - In the type signature for `f': f :: (a `X` a, Maybe) + Expecting one more argument to ‛Maybe’ + The second argument of a tuple should have kind ‛*’, + but ‛Maybe’ has kind ‛* -> *’ + In the type signature for ‛f’: f :: (a `X` a, Maybe) T7609.hs:10:19: - Expecting one more argument to `Maybe' - Expected a type, but `Maybe' has kind `* -> *' - In the type signature for `g': g :: a `X` a => Maybe + Expecting one more argument to ‛Maybe’ + Expected a type, but ‛Maybe’ has kind ‛* -> *’ + In the type signature for ‛g’: g :: a `X` a => Maybe diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7645.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7645.stderr index 96bd2e47c3..ae00e21ca6 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7645.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/T7645.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ T7645.hs:6:23: - Expecting one more argument to `Maybe' - The second argument of a tuple should have kind `*', - but `Maybe' has kind `* -> *' - In the type signature for `f': f :: ((+) a (a :: *), Maybe) + Expecting one more argument to ‛Maybe’ + The second argument of a tuple should have kind ‛*’, + but ‛Maybe’ has kind ‛* -> *’ + In the type signature for ‛f’: f :: ((+) a (a :: *), Maybe) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/TcMultiWayIfFail.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/TcMultiWayIfFail.stderr index fe53beac47..5655af9da6 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/TcMultiWayIfFail.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/TcMultiWayIfFail.stderr @@ -1,16 +1,16 @@ TcMultiWayIfFail.hs:6:24: - Couldn't match expected type `Int' with actual type `[Char]' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Int’ with actual type ‛[Char]’ In the expression: "2" In the expression: if | True -> 1 :: Int | False -> "2" | otherwise -> [3 :: Int] - In an equation for `x1': + In an equation for ‛x1’: x1 = if | True -> 1 :: Int | False -> "2" | otherwise -> [3 :: Int] TcMultiWayIfFail.hs:7:24: - Couldn't match expected type `Int' with actual type `[Int]' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Int’ with actual type ‛[Int]’ In the expression: [3 :: Int] In the expression: if | True -> 1 :: Int | False -> "2" | otherwise -> [3 :: Int] - In an equation for `x1': + In an equation for ‛x1’: x1 = if | True -> 1 :: Int | False -> "2" | otherwise -> [3 :: Int] diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/fd-loop.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/fd-loop.stderr index 3158a10077..37eae5d955 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/fd-loop.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/fd-loop.stderr @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ -
-fd-loop.hs:12:10:
- Variable `b' occurs more often than in the instance head
- in the constraint: C a b
- (Use -XUndecidableInstances to permit this)
- In the instance declaration for `Eq (T a)'
-
-fd-loop.hs:12:10:
- Variable `b' occurs more often than in the instance head
- in the constraint: Eq b
- (Use -XUndecidableInstances to permit this)
- In the instance declaration for `Eq (T a)'
+ +fd-loop.hs:12:10: + Variable ‛b’ occurs more often than in the instance head + in the constraint: C a b + (Use -XUndecidableInstances to permit this) + In the instance declaration for ‛Eq (T a)’ + +fd-loop.hs:12:10: + Variable ‛b’ occurs more often than in the instance head + in the constraint: Eq b + (Use -XUndecidableInstances to permit this) + In the instance declaration for ‛Eq (T a)’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/mc19.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/mc19.stderr index 7015d47d74..de2367cfe4 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/mc19.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/mc19.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ mc19.hs:10:31: - Couldn't match type `a' with `[a]' - `a' is a rigid type variable bound by + Couldn't match type ‛a’ with ‛[a]’ + ‛a’ is a rigid type variable bound by a type expected by the context: [a] -> [a] at mc19.hs:10:26 Expected type: [a] -> [a] Actual type: [a] -> [[a]] diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/mc20.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/mc20.stderr index 01048c4481..86be7f4a1a 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/mc20.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/mc20.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ mc20.hs:14:31: - No instance for (Ord Unorderable) arising from a use of `groupWith' + No instance for (Ord Unorderable) arising from a use of ‛groupWith’ In the expression: groupWith In a stmt of a monad comprehension: then group by x using groupWith In the expression: diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/mc21.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/mc21.stderr index bd7bac1dd9..eeda10a396 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/mc21.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/mc21.stderr @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ mc21.hs:12:26: - Couldn't match type `a' with `[a]' - `a' is a rigid type variable bound by + Couldn't match type ‛a’ with ‛[a]’ + ‛a’ is a rigid type variable bound by a type expected by the context: [a] -> [[a]] at mc21.hs:12:9 Expected type: [a] -> [[a]] Actual type: [a] -> [a] - In the return type of a call of `take' + In the return type of a call of ‛take’ In the expression: take 5 In a stmt of a monad comprehension: then group using take 5 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/mc22.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/mc22.stderr index d020bae094..7a4cc4e44b 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/mc22.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/mc22.stderr @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ mc22.hs:10:26: - Couldn't match type `a' with `t a' - `a' is a rigid type variable bound by + Couldn't match type ‛a’ with ‛t a’ + ‛a’ is a rigid type variable bound by a type expected by the context: [a] -> [t a] at mc22.hs:10:9 Expected type: [a] -> [t a] Actual type: [a] -> [a] Relevant bindings include foo :: [t [Char]] (bound at mc22.hs:8:1) - In the return type of a call of `take' + In the return type of a call of ‛take’ In the expression: take 5 In a stmt of a monad comprehension: then group using take 5 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/mc23.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/mc23.stderr index b8c3987280..674c5571d1 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/mc23.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/mc23.stderr @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ mc23.hs:9:29: - Couldn't match type `[a0]' with `a -> b' + Couldn't match type ‛[a0]’ with ‛a -> b’ Expected type: (a -> b) -> [a] -> t a Actual type: [a0] -> [a0] Relevant bindings include z :: t b (bound at mc23.hs:9:1) - In the return type of a call of `take' - Probable cause: `take' is applied to too many arguments + In the return type of a call of ‛take’ + Probable cause: ‛take’ is applied to too many arguments In the expression: take 5 In a stmt of a monad comprehension: then take 5 by x diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/mc24.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/mc24.stderr index 92b66b0464..8a67d364d0 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/mc24.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/mc24.stderr @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ mc24.hs:10:31: - Couldn't match type `[a0]' with `a -> a1' + Couldn't match type ‛[a0]’ with ‛a -> a1’ Expected type: (a -> a1) -> [a] -> t [a] Actual type: [a0] -> [a0] - In the return type of a call of `take' - Probable cause: `take' is applied to too many arguments + In the return type of a call of ‛take’ + Probable cause: ‛take’ is applied to too many arguments In the expression: take 2 In a stmt of a monad comprehension: then group by x using take 2 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/mc25.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/mc25.stderr index 3925f833f0..855ec1eb18 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/mc25.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/mc25.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ mc25.hs:9:46: - Couldn't match type `Int' with `a -> t' + Couldn't match type ‛Int’ with ‛a -> t’ Expected type: (a -> t) -> [a] -> [t1 a] Actual type: Int -> [a] -> [a] Relevant bindings include z :: [t1 t] (bound at mc25.hs:9:1) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail001.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail001.stderr index 8734ee32b4..32418ac5c2 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail001.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail001.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ tcfail001.hs:9:2: - Couldn't match expected type `[t0] -> [t1]' with actual type `[a]' + Couldn't match expected type ‛[t0] -> [t1]’ with actual type ‛[a]’ Relevant bindings include op :: [a] (bound at tcfail001.hs:9:2) - The equation(s) for `op' have one argument, - but its type `[a]' has none - In the instance declaration for `A [a]' + The equation(s) for ‛op’ have one argument, + but its type ‛[a]’ has none + In the instance declaration for ‛A [a]’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail002.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail002.stderr index 3a9c89c13d..f055d66eb6 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail002.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail002.stderr @@ -5,4 +5,4 @@ tcfail002.hs:4:7: c :: [t] -> t (bound at tcfail002.hs:3:1) z :: [t] (bound at tcfail002.hs:4:3) In the expression: z - In an equation for `c': c z = z + In an equation for ‛c’: c z = z diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail003.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail003.stderr index 42d7c59764..e605497890 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail003.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail003.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ tcfail003.hs:3:10: - No instance for (Num Char) arising from the literal `1' + No instance for (Num Char) arising from the literal ‛1’ In the expression: 1 In the expression: [1, 'a'] In a pattern binding: (d : e) = [1, 'a'] diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail004.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail004.stderr index 112a3aab38..bf439ab343 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail004.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail004.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ tcfail004.hs:3:9: - Couldn't match expected type `(t, t3)' - with actual type `(t0, t1, t2)' + Couldn't match expected type ‛(t, t3)’ + with actual type ‛(t0, t1, t2)’ Relevant bindings include g :: t3 (bound at tcfail004.hs:3:4) f :: t (bound at tcfail004.hs:3:2) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail005.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail005.stderr index fa97c98b06..ebb2999f79 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail005.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail005.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ tcfail005.hs:3:9: - Couldn't match expected type `[t]' with actual type `(t0, Char)' + Couldn't match expected type ‛[t]’ with actual type ‛(t0, Char)’ Relevant bindings include i :: [t] (bound at tcfail005.hs:3:4) h :: t (bound at tcfail005.hs:3:2) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail006.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail006.stderr index a31f4fdc21..387fe56b49 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail006.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail006.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ tcfail006.hs:4:24: - No instance for (Num Bool) arising from the literal `1' + No instance for (Num Bool) arising from the literal ‛1’ In the expression: 1 In the expression: (True, 1) In a case alternative: True -> (True, 1) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail007.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail007.stderr index d375e40eb2..99c9504a7e 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail007.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail007.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ tcfail007.hs:3:15: - No instance for (Num Bool) arising from a use of `+' + No instance for (Num Bool) arising from a use of ‛+’ In the expression: x + 1 - In an equation for `n': + In an equation for ‛n’: n x | True = x + 1 | False = True diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail008.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail008.stderr index 7abed93f58..09c4c54558 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail008.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail008.stderr @@ -1,20 +1,20 @@ -
-tcfail008.hs:3:5:
- No instance for (Num a0) arising from the literal `1'
- The type variable `a0' is ambiguous
- Relevant bindings include o :: [a0] (bound at tcfail008.hs:3:1)
- Note: there are several potential instances:
- instance Num Double -- Defined in `GHC.Float'
- instance Num Float -- Defined in `GHC.Float'
- instance Integral a => Num (GHC.Real.Ratio a)
- -- Defined in `GHC.Real'
- ...plus three others
- In the first argument of `(:)', namely `1'
- In the expression: 1 : 2
- In an equation for `o': o = 1 : 2
-
-tcfail008.hs:3:7:
- No instance for (Num [a0]) arising from the literal `2'
- In the second argument of `(:)', namely `2'
- In the expression: 1 : 2
- In an equation for `o': o = 1 : 2
+ +tcfail008.hs:3:5: + No instance for (Num a0) arising from the literal ‛1’ + The type variable ‛a0’ is ambiguous + Relevant bindings include o :: [a0] (bound at tcfail008.hs:3:1) + Note: there are several potential instances: + instance Num Double -- Defined in ‛GHC.Float’ + instance Num Float -- Defined in ‛GHC.Float’ + instance Integral a => Num (GHC.Real.Ratio a) + -- Defined in ‛GHC.Real’ + ...plus three others + In the first argument of ‛(:)’, namely ‛1’ + In the expression: 1 : 2 + In an equation for ‛o’: o = 1 : 2 + +tcfail008.hs:3:7: + No instance for (Num [a0]) arising from the literal ‛2’ + In the second argument of ‛(:)’, namely ‛2’ + In the expression: 1 : 2 + In an equation for ‛o’: o = 1 : 2 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail009.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail009.stderr index 8226c1fbdc..517e39c36f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail009.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail009.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ tcfail009.hs:3:17: - Couldn't match expected type `Int' with actual type `Integer' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Int’ with actual type ‛Integer’ In the expression: (2 :: Integer) In the expression: [(1 :: Int) .. (2 :: Integer)] - In an equation for `p': p = [(1 :: Int) .. (2 :: Integer)] + In an equation for ‛p’: p = [(1 :: Int) .. (2 :: Integer)] diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail010.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail010.stderr index 695655c31e..3f718371aa 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail010.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail010.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ tcfail010.hs:3:17: - No instance for (Num [t0]) arising from a use of `+' + No instance for (Num [t0]) arising from a use of ‛+’ In the expression: z + 2 In the expression: \ (y : z) -> z + 2 - In an equation for `q': q = \ (y : z) -> z + 2 + In an equation for ‛q’: q = \ (y : z) -> z + 2 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail011.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail011.stderr index f41e3a67ce..8ef94fec12 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail011.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail011.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -tcfail011.hs:3:25: Not in scope: `y' +tcfail011.hs:3:25: Not in scope: ‛y’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail012.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail012.stderr index 7d99a18a3c..257eca351f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail012.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail012.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ tcfail012.hs:3:8: - Couldn't match expected type `Bool' with actual type `[t0]' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Bool’ with actual type ‛[t0]’ In the expression: [] In a pattern binding: True = [] diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail013.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail013.stderr index a1fd433f67..075c4dab87 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail013.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail013.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ tcfail013.hs:4:3: - Couldn't match expected type `[t]' with actual type `Bool' + Couldn't match expected type ‛[t]’ with actual type ‛Bool’ Relevant bindings include f :: [t] -> a (bound at tcfail013.hs:3:1) In the pattern: True - In an equation for `f': f True = 2 + In an equation for ‛f’: f True = 2 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail014.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail014.stderr index 713ffce5e5..1e4b637a9f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail014.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail014.stderr @@ -4,6 +4,6 @@ tcfail014.hs:5:33: Relevant bindings include h :: (t8 -> t7) -> t7 (bound at tcfail014.hs:5:25) z :: t8 -> t7 (bound at tcfail014.hs:5:27) - In the first argument of `z', namely `z' + In the first argument of ‛z’, namely ‛z’ In the expression: z z - In an equation for `h': h z = z z + In an equation for ‛h’: h z = z z diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail015.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail015.stderr index 41899dffb4..7e02253760 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail015.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail015.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ tcfail015.hs:7:13: - No instance for (Num Bool) arising from the literal `2' + No instance for (Num Bool) arising from the literal ‛2’ In the expression: 2 - In an equation for `g': g (ANull) = 2 + In an equation for ‛g’: g (ANull) = 2 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail016.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail016.stderr index 17f2f16e4c..15122e8e1b 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail016.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail016.stderr @@ -1,24 +1,24 @@ tcfail016.hs:9:20: - Couldn't match type `(t, Expr t)' with `Expr t' + Couldn't match type ‛(t, Expr t)’ with ‛Expr t’ Expected type: Expr t Actual type: AnnExpr t Relevant bindings include g :: Expr t -> [[Char]] (bound at tcfail016.hs:8:1) e1 :: AnnExpr t (bound at tcfail016.hs:9:8) e2 :: AnnExpr t (bound at tcfail016.hs:9:11) - In the first argument of `g', namely `e1' - In the first argument of `(++)', namely `(g e1)' + In the first argument of ‛g’, namely ‛e1’ + In the first argument of ‛(++)’, namely ‛(g e1)’ In the expression: (g e1) ++ (g e2) tcfail016.hs:9:28: - Couldn't match type `(t, Expr t)' with `Expr t' + Couldn't match type ‛(t, Expr t)’ with ‛Expr t’ Expected type: Expr t Actual type: AnnExpr t Relevant bindings include g :: Expr t -> [[Char]] (bound at tcfail016.hs:8:1) e1 :: AnnExpr t (bound at tcfail016.hs:9:8) e2 :: AnnExpr t (bound at tcfail016.hs:9:11) - In the first argument of `g', namely `e2' - In the second argument of `(++)', namely `(g e2)' + In the first argument of ‛g’, namely ‛e2’ + In the second argument of ‛(++)’, namely ‛(g e2)’ In the expression: (g e1) ++ (g e2) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail017.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail017.stderr index 006ff73d14..a0d73da862 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail017.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail017.stderr @@ -4,4 +4,4 @@ tcfail017.hs:10:10: arising from the superclasses of an instance declaration from the context (B a) bound by the instance declaration at tcfail017.hs:10:10-23 - In the instance declaration for `B [a]' + In the instance declaration for ‛B [a]’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail018.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail018.stderr index 67b3cbb47e..687938983b 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail018.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail018.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ tcfail018.hs:5:10: - No instance for (Num [t0]) arising from the literal `1' + No instance for (Num [t0]) arising from the literal ‛1’ In the expression: 1 In a pattern binding: (a : []) = 1 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail019.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail019.stderr index 79ab411795..848805abda 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail019.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail019.stderr @@ -2,4 +2,4 @@ tcfail019.hs:18:10: No instance for (B [a]) arising from the superclasses of an instance declaration - In the instance declaration for `D [a]' + In the instance declaration for ‛D [a]’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail020.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail020.stderr index 13ef851ed6..9dfaa63a4e 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail020.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail020.stderr @@ -4,4 +4,4 @@ tcfail020.hs:10:10: arising from the superclasses of an instance declaration from the context (A a) bound by the instance declaration at tcfail020.hs:10:10-23 - In the instance declaration for `B [a]' + In the instance declaration for ‛B [a]’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail027.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail027.stderr index c5df0bcbf3..cc4ffcaab3 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail027.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail027.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ tcfail027.hs:4:1: Cycle in class declaration (via superclasses): A -> B -> A - In the class declaration for `A' + In the class declaration for ‛A’ tcfail027.hs:7:1: Cycle in class declaration (via superclasses): B -> A -> B - In the class declaration for `B' + In the class declaration for ‛B’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail028.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail028.stderr index 53e3f7614e..a5c0a59612 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail028.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail028.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ tcfail028.hs:4:17: - Expecting one more argument to `A a' - Expected a type, but `A a' has kind `k0 -> *' - In the type `A a' - In the definition of data constructor `B' - In the data declaration for `A' + Expecting one more argument to ‛A a’ + Expected a type, but ‛A a’ has kind ‛k0 -> *’ + In the type ‛A a’ + In the definition of data constructor ‛B’ + In the data declaration for ‛A’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail029.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail029.stderr index d9cb862388..13a1e4936e 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail029.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail029.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ tcfail029.hs:6:9: - No instance for (Ord Foo) arising from a use of `>' + No instance for (Ord Foo) arising from a use of ‛>’ In the expression: x > Bar - In an equation for `f': f x = x > Bar + In an equation for ‛f’: f x = x > Bar diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail030.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail030.stderr index cb9d80959d..e0a8b494f3 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail030.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail030.stderr @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ tcfail030.hs:1:1: - The function `main' is not defined in module `Main' + The function ‛main’ is not defined in module ‛Main’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail031.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail031.stderr index f7fc14bb1f..5d55430eaa 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail031.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail031.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ tcfail031.hs:3:10: - Couldn't match expected type `Bool' with actual type `Char' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Bool’ with actual type ‛Char’ In the expression: 'a' In the expression: if 'a' then 1 else 2 - In an equation for `f': f x = if 'a' then 1 else 2 + In an equation for ‛f’: f x = if 'a' then 1 else 2 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail032.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail032.stderr index 5a93f8c66c..56e4a791ad 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail032.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail032.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ tcfail032.hs:14:8: - Couldn't match expected type `a1 -> Int' with actual type `t' - because type variable `a1' would escape its scope + Couldn't match expected type ‛a1 -> Int’ with actual type ‛t’ + because type variable ‛a1’ would escape its scope This (rigid, skolem) type variable is bound by an expression type signature: Eq a1 => a1 -> Int at tcfail032.hs:14:8-30 @@ -9,4 +9,4 @@ tcfail032.hs:14:8: f :: t -> a -> Int (bound at tcfail032.hs:14:1) x :: t (bound at tcfail032.hs:14:3) In the expression: (x :: Eq a => a -> Int) - In an equation for `f': f x = (x :: Eq a => a -> Int) + In an equation for ‛f’: f x = (x :: Eq a => a -> Int) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail033.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail033.stderr index 5382284334..0ebb5c826e 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail033.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail033.stderr @@ -7,4 +7,4 @@ tcfail033.hs:4:12: y :: t1 (bound at tcfail033.hs:4:19) In the expression: x In the expression: [x | (x, y) <- buglet] - In an equation for `buglet': buglet = [x | (x, y) <- buglet] + In an equation for ‛buglet’: buglet = [x | (x, y) <- buglet] diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail034.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail034.stderr index 38b04c10c6..3fca8122b9 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail034.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail034.stderr @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ tcfail034.hs:17:13: - Could not deduce (Integral a) arising from a use of `mod' + Could not deduce (Integral a) arising from a use of ‛mod’ from the context (Num a, Eq a) bound by the type signature for test :: (Num a, Eq a) => a -> Bool at tcfail034.hs:16:7-32 Possible fix: add (Integral a) to the context of the type signature for test :: (Num a, Eq a) => a -> Bool - In the first argument of `(==)', namely `(x `mod` 3)' + In the first argument of ‛(==)’, namely ‛(x `mod` 3)’ In the expression: (x `mod` 3) == 0 - In an equation for `test': test x = (x `mod` 3) == 0 + In an equation for ‛test’: test x = (x `mod` 3) == 0 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail036.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail036.stderr index 98d1722787..465e454712 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail036.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail036.stderr @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ tcfail036.hs:6:10: instance Num NUM -- Defined at tcfail036.hs:8:10 tcfail036.hs:9:13: - Expecting one more argument to `Num' - The first argument of `Eq' should have kind `*', - but `Num' has kind `* -> Constraint' - In the instance declaration for `Eq Num' + Expecting one more argument to ‛Num’ + The first argument of ‛Eq’ should have kind ‛*’, + but ‛Num’ has kind ‛* -> Constraint’ + In the instance declaration for ‛Eq Num’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail037.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail037.stderr index 998a68ccdc..00f757841c 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail037.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail037.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ tcfail037.hs:7:11: - Ambiguous occurrence `+' - It could refer to either `ShouldFail.+', + Ambiguous occurrence ‛+’ + It could refer to either ‛ShouldFail.+’, defined at tcfail037.hs:10:5 - or `Prelude.+', - imported from `Prelude' at tcfail037.hs:3:8-17 - (and originally defined in `GHC.Num') + or ‛Prelude.+’, + imported from ‛Prelude’ at tcfail037.hs:3:8-17 + (and originally defined in ‛GHC.Num’) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail038.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail038.stderr index 70e13f3c72..f8b7915e00 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail038.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail038.stderr @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ tcfail038.hs:7:11: - Conflicting definitions for `==' + Conflicting definitions for ‛==’ Bound at: tcfail038.hs:7:11-12 tcfail038.hs:9:11-12 tcfail038.hs:8:11: - Conflicting definitions for `/=' + Conflicting definitions for ‛/=’ Bound at: tcfail038.hs:8:11-12 tcfail038.hs:10:11-12 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail040.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail040.stderr index 003cb9f6d0..90fb76d99d 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail040.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail040.stderr @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ -
-tcfail040.hs:19:5:
- No instance for (ORD a0) arising from a use of `<<'
- The type variable `a0' is ambiguous
- Note: there is a potential instance available:
- instance ORD (a -> b) -- Defined at tcfail040.hs:17:10
- In the first argument of `(===)', namely `(<<)'
- In the expression: (<<) === (<<)
- In an equation for `f': f = (<<) === (<<)
+ +tcfail040.hs:19:5: + No instance for (ORD a0) arising from a use of ‛<<’ + The type variable ‛a0’ is ambiguous + Note: there is a potential instance available: + instance ORD (a -> b) -- Defined at tcfail040.hs:17:10 + In the first argument of ‛(===)’, namely ‛(<<)’ + In the expression: (<<) === (<<) + In an equation for ‛f’: f = (<<) === (<<) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail041.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail041.stderr index ae8cd47aee..f86384133d 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail041.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail041.stderr @@ -2,4 +2,4 @@ tcfail041.hs:9:10: Unbound implicit parameter (?imp::Int) arising from the superclasses of an instance declaration - In the instance declaration for `D Int' + In the instance declaration for ‛D Int’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail042.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail042.stderr index 76031bb221..1e1c5ad01e 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail042.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail042.stderr @@ -6,4 +6,4 @@ tcfail042.hs:15:10: bound by the instance declaration at tcfail042.hs:15:10-34 Possible fix: add (Num a) to the context of the instance declaration - In the instance declaration for `Bar [a]' + In the instance declaration for ‛Bar [a]’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail043.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail043.stderr index ef4e999996..9be218f040 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail043.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail043.stderr @@ -1,40 +1,40 @@ -
-tcfail043.hs:38:17:
- No instance for (Ord_ a0) arising from a use of `gt'
- The type variable `a0' is ambiguous
- Relevant bindings include
- search :: a0 -> [a0] -> Bool (bound at tcfail043.hs:37:1)
- a :: a0 (bound at tcfail043.hs:38:6)
- bs :: [a0] (bound at tcfail043.hs:38:8)
- Note: there is a potential instance available:
- instance Ord_ Int -- Defined at tcfail043.hs:34:10
- In the expression: gt (hd bs) a
- In the expression:
- if gt (hd bs) a then
- False
- else
- if eq a (hd bs) then True else search a (tl bs)
- In the expression:
- \ a bs
- -> if gt (hd bs) a then
- False
- else
- if eq a (hd bs) then True else search a (tl bs)
-
-tcfail043.hs:40:25:
- No instance for (Eq_ a0) arising from a use of `eq'
- The type variable `a0' is ambiguous
- Relevant bindings include
- search :: a0 -> [a0] -> Bool (bound at tcfail043.hs:37:1)
- a :: a0 (bound at tcfail043.hs:38:6)
- bs :: [a0] (bound at tcfail043.hs:38:8)
- Note: there are several potential instances:
- instance Eq_ a => Eq_ [a] -- Defined at tcfail043.hs:23:10
- instance Eq_ Int -- Defined at tcfail043.hs:20:10
- In the expression: eq a (hd bs)
- In the expression: if eq a (hd bs) then True else search a (tl bs)
- In the expression:
- if gt (hd bs) a then
- False
- else
- if eq a (hd bs) then True else search a (tl bs)
+ +tcfail043.hs:38:17: + No instance for (Ord_ a0) arising from a use of ‛gt’ + The type variable ‛a0’ is ambiguous + Relevant bindings include + search :: a0 -> [a0] -> Bool (bound at tcfail043.hs:37:1) + a :: a0 (bound at tcfail043.hs:38:6) + bs :: [a0] (bound at tcfail043.hs:38:8) + Note: there is a potential instance available: + instance Ord_ Int -- Defined at tcfail043.hs:34:10 + In the expression: gt (hd bs) a + In the expression: + if gt (hd bs) a then + False + else + if eq a (hd bs) then True else search a (tl bs) + In the expression: + \ a bs + -> if gt (hd bs) a then + False + else + if eq a (hd bs) then True else search a (tl bs) + +tcfail043.hs:40:25: + No instance for (Eq_ a0) arising from a use of ‛eq’ + The type variable ‛a0’ is ambiguous + Relevant bindings include + search :: a0 -> [a0] -> Bool (bound at tcfail043.hs:37:1) + a :: a0 (bound at tcfail043.hs:38:6) + bs :: [a0] (bound at tcfail043.hs:38:8) + Note: there are several potential instances: + instance Eq_ a => Eq_ [a] -- Defined at tcfail043.hs:23:10 + instance Eq_ Int -- Defined at tcfail043.hs:20:10 + In the expression: eq a (hd bs) + In the expression: if eq a (hd bs) then True else search a (tl bs) + In the expression: + if gt (hd bs) a then + False + else + if eq a (hd bs) then True else search a (tl bs) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail044.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail044.stderr index 03ad2fb705..ab3b94f007 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail044.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail044.stderr @@ -1,16 +1,16 @@ tcfail044.hs:5:20: - Illegal instance declaration for `Eq (a -> a)' + Illegal instance declaration for ‛Eq (a -> a)’ (All instance types must be of the form (T a1 ... an) where a1 ... an are *distinct type variables*, and each type variable appears at most once in the instance head. Use -XFlexibleInstances if you want to disable this.) - In the instance declaration for `Eq (a -> a)' + In the instance declaration for ‛Eq (a -> a)’ tcfail044.hs:8:21: - Illegal instance declaration for `Num (a -> a)' + Illegal instance declaration for ‛Num (a -> a)’ (All instance types must be of the form (T a1 ... an) where a1 ... an are *distinct type variables*, and each type variable appears at most once in the instance head. Use -XFlexibleInstances if you want to disable this.) - In the instance declaration for `Num (a -> a)' + In the instance declaration for ‛Num (a -> a)’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail047.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail047.stderr index e99d9df755..5c96920f0e 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail047.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail047.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ tcfail047.hs:6:10: - Illegal instance declaration for `A (a, (b, c))' + Illegal instance declaration for ‛A (a, (b, c))’ (All instance types must be of the form (T a1 ... an) where a1 ... an are *distinct type variables*, and each type variable appears at most once in the instance head. Use -XFlexibleInstances if you want to disable this.) - In the instance declaration for `A (a, (b, c))' + In the instance declaration for ‛A (a, (b, c))’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail048.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail048.stderr index aa1330d46a..29d205e279 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail048.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail048.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -tcfail048.hs:3:8: Not in scope: type constructor or class `B' +tcfail048.hs:3:8: Not in scope: type constructor or class ‛B’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail049.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail049.stderr index 750a65bc3c..3a632e2425 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail049.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail049.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -tcfail049.hs:3:7: Not in scope: `g' +tcfail049.hs:3:7: Not in scope: ‛g’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail050.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail050.stderr index 9115af93fb..5d7a917f53 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail050.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail050.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -tcfail050.hs:3:7: Not in scope: data constructor `B' +tcfail050.hs:3:7: Not in scope: data constructor ‛B’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail051.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail051.stderr index 35a33d2aa2..f4b0c0c563 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail051.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail051.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -
-tcfail051.hs:3:10: Not in scope: type constructor or class `B'
+ +tcfail051.hs:3:10: Not in scope: type constructor or class ‛B’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail052.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail052.stderr index 9ffa31c227..2359b4433e 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail052.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail052.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -tcfail052.hs:3:16: Not in scope: type variable `c' +tcfail052.hs:3:16: Not in scope: type variable ‛c’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail053.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail053.stderr index 9889c3f0f6..c014f2f4f3 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail053.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail053.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -tcfail053.hs:3:12: Not in scope: type constructor or class `A' +tcfail053.hs:3:12: Not in scope: type constructor or class ‛A’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail054.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail054.stderr index 1a5cfca053..93b200983f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail054.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail054.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -tcfail054.hs:3:4: Not in scope: data constructor `B' +tcfail054.hs:3:4: Not in scope: data constructor ‛B’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail055.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail055.stderr index ac012da98e..c82e9af2aa 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail055.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail055.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ tcfail055.hs:3:8: - Couldn't match expected type `Float' with actual type `Int' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Float’ with actual type ‛Int’ In the expression: (x + 1 :: Int) :: Float - In an equation for `f': f x = (x + 1 :: Int) :: Float + In an equation for ‛f’: f x = (x + 1 :: Int) :: Float diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail056.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail056.stderr index 09505ed945..60bba97453 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail056.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail056.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -tcfail056.hs:10:15: `<=' is not a (visible) method of class `Eq' +tcfail056.hs:10:15: ‛<=’ is not a (visible) method of class ‛Eq’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail057.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail057.stderr index 9399e91486..5b19563bfc 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail057.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail057.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ tcfail057.hs:5:7: - Expected a type, but `RealFrac a' has kind `Constraint' - In the type signature for `f': f :: (RealFrac a) -> a -> a + Expected a type, but ‛RealFrac a’ has kind ‛Constraint’ + In the type signature for ‛f’: f :: (RealFrac a) -> a -> a diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail058.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail058.stderr index 880bef69e3..f5770a42dd 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail058.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail058.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ tcfail058.hs:6:7: - Expecting one more argument to `Array a' - Expected a constraint, but `Array a' has kind `* -> *' - In the type signature for `f': f :: Array a => a -> b + Expecting one more argument to ‛Array a’ + Expected a constraint, but ‛Array a’ has kind ‛* -> *’ + In the type signature for ‛f’: f :: Array a => a -> b diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail061.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail061.stderr index a047863e9b..14ce5aec71 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail061.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail061.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ -tcfail061.hs:5:17: Not in scope: type variable `b' +tcfail061.hs:5:17: Not in scope: type variable ‛b’ -tcfail061.hs:5:19: Not in scope: type variable `b' +tcfail061.hs:5:19: Not in scope: type variable ‛b’ -tcfail061.hs:11:22: Not in scope: type variable `b' +tcfail061.hs:11:22: Not in scope: type variable ‛b’ -tcfail061.hs:11:24: Not in scope: type variable `b' +tcfail061.hs:11:24: Not in scope: type variable ‛b’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail062.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail062.stderr index 9ee1bb75a9..2111c7e0fa 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail062.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail062.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ tcfail062.hs:34:6: - Not in scope: type variable `behaviouralExpression' + Not in scope: type variable ‛behaviouralExpression’ tcfail062.hs:34:29: - Not in scope: type variable `behaviouralExpression' + Not in scope: type variable ‛behaviouralExpression’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail063.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail063.stderr index 35d4f406a7..0464396725 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail063.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail063.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ tcfail063.hs:6:9: - Expecting one more argument to `Num' - Expected a constraint, but `Num' has kind `* -> Constraint' - In the type signature for `moby': moby :: Num => Int -> a -> Int + Expecting one more argument to ‛Num’ + Expected a constraint, but ‛Num’ has kind ‛* -> Constraint’ + In the type signature for ‛moby’: moby :: Num => Int -> a -> Int diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail065.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail065.stderr index c680e8264d..8599dfeb2a 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail065.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail065.stderr @@ -1,14 +1,14 @@ tcfail065.hs:29:20: - Couldn't match expected type `x' with actual type `x1' - `x1' is a rigid type variable bound by + Couldn't match expected type ‛x’ with actual type ‛x1’ + ‛x1’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for setX :: x1 -> X x -> X x at tcfail065.hs:29:3 - `x' is a rigid type variable bound by + ‛x’ is a rigid type variable bound by the instance declaration at tcfail065.hs:28:10 Relevant bindings include setX :: x1 -> X x -> X x (bound at tcfail065.hs:29:3) x :: x1 (bound at tcfail065.hs:29:8) - In the first argument of `X', namely `x' + In the first argument of ‛X’, namely ‛x’ In the expression: X x - In an equation for `setX': setX x (X _) = X x + In an equation for ‛setX’: setX x (X _) = X x diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail067.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail067.stderr index 9e47a0bebc..ebe87035d1 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail067.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail067.stderr @@ -3,24 +3,24 @@ tcfail067.hs:1:14: Warning: -XDatatypeContexts is deprecated: It was widely considered a misfeature, and has been removed from the Haskell language. tcfail067.hs:12:16: - No instance for (Ord a) arising from a use of `SubRange' + No instance for (Ord a) arising from a use of ‛SubRange’ Possible fix: add (Ord a) to the context of the type signature for subRangeValue :: SubRange a -> a In the pattern: SubRange (lower, upper) value - In an equation for `subRangeValue': + In an equation for ‛subRangeValue’: subRangeValue (SubRange (lower, upper) value) = value tcfail067.hs:15:11: - No instance for (Ord a) arising from a use of `SubRange' + No instance for (Ord a) arising from a use of ‛SubRange’ Possible fix: add (Ord a) to the context of the type signature for subRange :: SubRange a -> (a, a) In the pattern: SubRange r value - In an equation for `subRange': subRange (SubRange r value) = r + In an equation for ‛subRange’: subRange (SubRange r value) = r tcfail067.hs:46:12: - Could not deduce (Ord a) arising from a use of `SubRange' + Could not deduce (Ord a) arising from a use of ‛SubRange’ from the context (Show a) bound by the type signature for showRange :: Show a => SubRange a -> String @@ -29,35 +29,35 @@ tcfail067.hs:46:12: add (Ord a) to the context of the type signature for showRange :: Show a => SubRange a -> String In the pattern: SubRange (lower, upper) value - In an equation for `showRange': + In an equation for ‛showRange’: showRange (SubRange (lower, upper) value) = show value ++ " :" ++ show lower ++ ".." ++ show upper tcfail067.hs:61:12: - Could not deduce (Show a) arising from a use of `numSubRangeNegate' + Could not deduce (Show a) arising from a use of ‛numSubRangeNegate’ from the context (Num a) bound by the instance declaration at tcfail067.hs:60:10-34 Possible fix: add (Show a) to the context of the instance declaration In the expression: numSubRangeNegate - In an equation for `negate': negate = numSubRangeNegate - In the instance declaration for `Num (SubRange a)' + In an equation for ‛negate’: negate = numSubRangeNegate + In the instance declaration for ‛Num (SubRange a)’ tcfail067.hs:65:19: - Could not deduce (Ord a) arising from a use of `SubRange' + Could not deduce (Ord a) arising from a use of ‛SubRange’ from the context (Num a) bound by the instance declaration at tcfail067.hs:60:10-34 Possible fix: add (Ord a) to the context of the instance declaration In the expression: SubRange (fromInteger a, fromInteger a) (fromInteger a) - In an equation for `fromInteger': + In an equation for ‛fromInteger’: fromInteger a = SubRange (fromInteger a, fromInteger a) (fromInteger a) - In the instance declaration for `Num (SubRange a)' + In the instance declaration for ‛Num (SubRange a)’ tcfail067.hs:74:5: - Could not deduce (Ord a) arising from a use of `SubRange' + Could not deduce (Ord a) arising from a use of ‛SubRange’ from the context (Num a) bound by the type signature for numSubRangeBinOp :: Num a => @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ tcfail067.hs:74:5: numSubRangeBinOp :: Num a => (a -> a -> a) -> SubRange a -> SubRange a -> SubRange a In the expression: SubRange (result, result) result - In an equation for `numSubRangeBinOp': + In an equation for ‛numSubRangeBinOp’: numSubRangeBinOp op a b = SubRange (result, result) result where diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail068.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail068.stderr index 687c8eaca7..4e889720e1 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail068.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail068.stderr @@ -5,10 +5,10 @@ tcfail068.hs:14:9: bound by the type signature for itgen :: Constructed a => (Int, Int) -> a -> IndTree s a at tcfail068.hs:11:10-55 - `s1' is a rigid type variable bound by + ‛s1’ is a rigid type variable bound by a type expected by the context: GHC.ST.ST s1 (IndTree s a) at tcfail068.hs:13:9 - `s' is a rigid type variable bound by + ‛s’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for itgen :: Constructed a => (Int, Int) -> a -> IndTree s a at tcfail068.hs:11:10 @@ -17,9 +17,9 @@ tcfail068.hs:14:9: Relevant bindings include itgen :: (Int, Int) -> a -> IndTree s a (bound at tcfail068.hs:12:1) - In the return type of a call of `newSTArray' - In the first argument of `runST', namely - `(newSTArray ((1, 1), n) x)' + In the return type of a call of ‛newSTArray’ + In the first argument of ‛runST’, namely + ‛(newSTArray ((1, 1), n) x)’ In the expression: runST (newSTArray ((1, 1), n) x) tcfail068.hs:19:21: @@ -29,12 +29,12 @@ tcfail068.hs:19:21: itiap :: Constructed a => (Int, Int) -> (a -> a) -> IndTree s a -> IndTree s a at tcfail068.hs:16:10-75 - `s' is a rigid type variable bound by + ‛s’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for itiap :: Constructed a => (Int, Int) -> (a -> a) -> IndTree s a -> IndTree s a at tcfail068.hs:16:10 - `s1' is a rigid type variable bound by + ‛s1’ is a rigid type variable bound by a type expected by the context: GHC.ST.ST s1 (IndTree s a) at tcfail068.hs:18:9 Expected type: STArray s1 (Int, Int) a @@ -43,11 +43,11 @@ tcfail068.hs:19:21: itiap :: (Int, Int) -> (a -> a) -> IndTree s a -> IndTree s a (bound at tcfail068.hs:17:1) arr :: IndTree s a (bound at tcfail068.hs:17:11) - In the first argument of `readSTArray', namely `arr' - In the first argument of `(>>=)', namely `readSTArray arr i' - In the first argument of `runST', namely - `(readSTArray arr i - >>= \ val -> writeSTArray arr i (f val) >> return arr)' + In the first argument of ‛readSTArray’, namely ‛arr’ + In the first argument of ‛(>>=)’, namely ‛readSTArray arr i’ + In the first argument of ‛runST’, namely + ‛(readSTArray arr i + >>= \ val -> writeSTArray arr i (f val) >> return arr)’ tcfail068.hs:24:35: Could not deduce (s ~ s1) @@ -56,12 +56,12 @@ tcfail068.hs:24:35: itrap :: Constructed a => ((Int, Int), (Int, Int)) -> (a -> a) -> IndTree s a -> IndTree s a at tcfail068.hs:23:10-87 - `s' is a rigid type variable bound by + ‛s’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for itrap :: Constructed a => ((Int, Int), (Int, Int)) -> (a -> a) -> IndTree s a -> IndTree s a at tcfail068.hs:23:10 - `s1' is a rigid type variable bound by + ‛s1’ is a rigid type variable bound by a type expected by the context: GHC.ST.ST s1 (IndTree s a) at tcfail068.hs:24:29 Expected type: GHC.ST.ST s1 (IndTree s a) @@ -75,8 +75,8 @@ tcfail068.hs:24:35: (bound at tcfail068.hs:29:9) itrap' :: Int -> Int -> GHC.ST.ST s (IndTree s a) (bound at tcfail068.hs:26:9) - In the return type of a call of itrap' - In the first argument of `runST', namely `(itrap' i k)' + In the return type of a call of ‛itrap'’ + In the first argument of ‛runST’, namely ‛(itrap' i k)’ In the expression: runST (itrap' i k) tcfail068.hs:36:46: @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ tcfail068.hs:36:46: -> IndTree s b -> (c, IndTree s b) at tcfail068.hs:(34,15)-(35,62) - `s' is a rigid type variable bound by + ‛s’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for itrapstate :: Constructed b => ((Int, Int), (Int, Int)) @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ tcfail068.hs:36:46: -> IndTree s b -> (c, IndTree s b) at tcfail068.hs:34:15 - `s1' is a rigid type variable bound by + ‛s1’ is a rigid type variable bound by a type expected by the context: GHC.ST.ST s1 (c, IndTree s b) at tcfail068.hs:36:40 Expected type: GHC.ST.ST s1 (c, IndTree s b) @@ -122,6 +122,6 @@ tcfail068.hs:36:46: (bound at tcfail068.hs:41:9) itrapstate' :: Int -> Int -> c -> GHC.ST.ST s (c, IndTree s b) (bound at tcfail068.hs:38:9) - In the return type of a call of itrapstate' - In the first argument of `runST', namely `(itrapstate' i k s)' + In the return type of a call of ‛itrapstate'’ + In the first argument of ‛runST’, namely ‛(itrapstate' i k s)’ In the expression: runST (itrapstate' i k s) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail069.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail069.stderr index 4c40526b5b..7c793c49ba 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail069.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail069.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ tcfail069.hs:21:7: - Couldn't match expected type `([Int], [Int])' - with actual type `[t0]' + Couldn't match expected type ‛([Int], [Int])’ + with actual type ‛[t0]’ In the pattern: [] In a case alternative: [] -> error "foo" In the expression: case (list1, list2) of { [] -> error "foo" } diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail070.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail070.stderr index 76e9feb515..bc0590aae8 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail070.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail070.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -
-tcfail070.hs:15:15:
- `[Int]' is applied to too many type arguments
- In the type `[Int] Bool'
- In the type declaration for `State'
+ +tcfail070.hs:15:15: + ‛[Int]’ is applied to too many type arguments + In the type ‛[Int] Bool’ + In the type declaration for ‛State’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail072.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail072.stderr index a71b0effda..b533d36509 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail072.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail072.stderr @@ -1,16 +1,16 @@ -
-tcfail072.hs:23:13:
- Could not deduce (Ord q0) arising from a use of `g'
- from the context (Ord p, Ord q)
- bound by the type signature for
- g :: (Ord p, Ord q) => AB p q -> Bool
- at tcfail072.hs:22:6-38
- The type variable `q0' is ambiguous
- Note: there are several potential instances:
- instance Integral a => Ord (GHC.Real.Ratio a)
- -- Defined in `GHC.Real'
- instance Ord () -- Defined in `GHC.Classes'
- instance (Ord a, Ord b) => Ord (a, b) -- Defined in `GHC.Classes'
- ...plus 22 others
- In the expression: g A
- In an equation for `g': g (B _ _) = g A
+ +tcfail072.hs:23:13: + Could not deduce (Ord q0) arising from a use of ‛g’ + from the context (Ord p, Ord q) + bound by the type signature for + g :: (Ord p, Ord q) => AB p q -> Bool + at tcfail072.hs:22:6-38 + The type variable ‛q0’ is ambiguous + Note: there are several potential instances: + instance Integral a => Ord (GHC.Real.Ratio a) + -- Defined in ‛GHC.Real’ + instance Ord () -- Defined in ‛GHC.Classes’ + instance (Ord a, Ord b) => Ord (a, b) -- Defined in ‛GHC.Classes’ + ...plus 22 others + In the expression: g A + In an equation for ‛g’: g (B _ _) = g A diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail073.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail073.stderr index 3ac8e21e0f..16bcdf4c0f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail073.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail073.stderr @@ -2,4 +2,4 @@ tcfail073.hs:8:10: Duplicate instance declarations: instance Eq a => Eq (a, b) -- Defined at tcfail073.hs:8:10 - instance (Eq a, Eq b) => Eq (a, b) -- Defined in `GHC.Classes' + instance (Eq a, Eq b) => Eq (a, b) -- Defined in ‛GHC.Classes’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail076.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail076.stderr index 5e8361aa66..c5bd8a5bc8 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail076.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail076.stderr @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ tcfail076.hs:18:82: - Couldn't match type `res' with `res1' - `res' is a rigid type variable bound by + Couldn't match type ‛res’ with ‛res1’ + ‛res’ is a rigid type variable bound by a type expected by the context: (a -> m res) -> m res at tcfail076.hs:18:28 - `res1' is a rigid type variable bound by + ‛res1’ is a rigid type variable bound by a type expected by the context: (b -> m res1) -> m res1 at tcfail076.hs:18:64 Expected type: m res1 @@ -12,6 +12,6 @@ tcfail076.hs:18:82: Relevant bindings include cont :: a -> m res (bound at tcfail076.hs:18:37) cont' :: b -> m res1 (bound at tcfail076.hs:18:73) - In the return type of a call of `cont' + In the return type of a call of ‛cont’ In the expression: cont a - In the first argument of `KContT', namely `(\ cont' -> cont a)' + In the first argument of ‛KContT’, namely ‛(\ cont' -> cont a)’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail077.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail077.stderr index 105604f66c..3f25950faf 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail077.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail077.stderr @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -tcfail077.hs:8:3: `op2' is not a (visible) method of class `Foo' +tcfail077.hs:8:3: ‛op2’ is not a (visible) method of class ‛Foo’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail078.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail078.stderr index 714e2807be..b3fabd30b9 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail078.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail078.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ tcfail078.hs:5:6: - `Integer' is applied to too many type arguments - In the type signature for `f': f :: Integer i => i + ‛Integer’ is applied to too many type arguments + In the type signature for ‛f’: f :: Integer i => i diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail079.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail079.stderr index a7b9b7cb3f..4cce1a69ba 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail079.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail079.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ tcfail079.hs:9:27: - Expecting a lifted type, but `Int#' is unlifted - In the type `Int#' - In the definition of data constructor `Unboxed' - In the newtype declaration for `Unboxed' + Expecting a lifted type, but ‛Int#’ is unlifted + In the type ‛Int#’ + In the definition of data constructor ‛Unboxed’ + In the newtype declaration for ‛Unboxed’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail080.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail080.stderr index 31ad546213..23afa16ba3 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail080.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail080.stderr @@ -1,13 +1,13 @@ -
-tcfail080.hs:27:1:
- Could not deduce (Collection c0 a)
- arising from the ambiguity check for `q'
- from the context (Collection c a)
- bound by the inferred type for `q': Collection c a => a -> Bool
- at tcfail080.hs:27:1-27
- The type variable `c0' is ambiguous
- When checking that `q'
- has the inferred type `forall (c :: * -> *) a.
- Collection c a =>
- a -> Bool'
- Probable cause: the inferred type is ambiguous
+ +tcfail080.hs:27:1: + Could not deduce (Collection c0 a) + arising from the ambiguity check for ‛q’ + from the context (Collection c a) + bound by the inferred type for ‛q’: Collection c a => a -> Bool + at tcfail080.hs:27:1-27 + The type variable ‛c0’ is ambiguous + When checking that ‛q’ + has the inferred type ‛forall (c :: * -> *) a. + Collection c a => + a -> Bool’ + Probable cause: the inferred type is ambiguous diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail082.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail082.stderr index 4fd34e6022..b34c6d1eca 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail082.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail082.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ tcfail082.hs:2:1: - Failed to load interface for `Data82' + Failed to load interface for ‛Data82’ Use -v to see a list of the files searched for. diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail083.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail083.stderr index 07717e090b..dc4ce59e9c 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail083.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail083.stderr @@ -1,20 +1,20 @@ -
-tcfail083.hs:8:39:
- Constructor `Bar' does not have field `baz'
- In the pattern: Bar {flag = f, baz = b}
- In the pattern: State {bar = Bar {flag = f, baz = b}}
- In an equation for `display':
- display (State {bar = Bar {flag = f, baz = b}}) = print (f, b)
-
-tcfail083.hs:8:53:
- No instance for (Show t0) arising from a use of `print'
- The type variable `t0' is ambiguous
- Relevant bindings include b :: t0 (bound at tcfail083.hs:8:45)
- Note: there are several potential instances:
- instance Show Bar -- Defined at tcfail083.hs:3:43
- instance Show Double -- Defined in `GHC.Float'
- instance Show Float -- Defined in `GHC.Float'
- ...plus 24 others
- In the expression: print (f, b)
- In an equation for `display':
- display (State {bar = Bar {flag = f, baz = b}}) = print (f, b)
+ +tcfail083.hs:8:39: + Constructor ‛Bar’ does not have field ‛baz’ + In the pattern: Bar {flag = f, baz = b} + In the pattern: State {bar = Bar {flag = f, baz = b}} + In an equation for ‛display’: + display (State {bar = Bar {flag = f, baz = b}}) = print (f, b) + +tcfail083.hs:8:53: + No instance for (Show t0) arising from a use of ‛print’ + The type variable ‛t0’ is ambiguous + Relevant bindings include b :: t0 (bound at tcfail083.hs:8:45) + Note: there are several potential instances: + instance Show Bar -- Defined at tcfail083.hs:3:43 + instance Show Double -- Defined in ‛GHC.Float’ + instance Show Float -- Defined in ‛GHC.Float’ + ...plus 24 others + In the expression: print (f, b) + In an equation for ‛display’: + display (State {bar = Bar {flag = f, baz = b}}) = print (f, b) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail084.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail084.stderr index 1a7e8c3e28..cfa0ff4835 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail084.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail084.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ tcfail084.hs:10:5: - Constructor `F' does not have field `y' + Constructor ‛F’ does not have field ‛y’ In the expression: F {y = 2} - In an equation for `z': z = F {y = 2} + In an equation for ‛z’: z = F {y = 2} diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail085.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail085.stderr index c500e7a180..feb7c6daf3 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail085.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail085.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ tcfail085.hs:9:5: - Constructor `F' does not have the required strict field(s): y + Constructor ‛F’ does not have the required strict field(s): y In the expression: F {x = 2} - In an equation for `z': z = F {x = 2} + In an equation for ‛z’: z = F {x = 2} diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail086.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail086.stderr index 1aa420928d..ebf4d4e8e6 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail086.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail086.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ -
-tcfail086.hs:6:38:
- Can't make a derived instance of `Eq Ex':
- Constructor `Ex' must have a Haskell-98 type
- Possible fix: use a standalone deriving declaration instead
- In the data declaration for `Ex'
+ +tcfail086.hs:6:38: + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Eq Ex’: + Constructor ‛Ex’ must have a Haskell-98 type + Possible fix: use a standalone deriving declaration instead + In the data declaration for ‛Ex’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail088.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail088.stderr index 1bf22ffaa8..1c303d9a65 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail088.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail088.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ tcfail088.hs:9:19: Illegal polymorphic or qualified type: forall s. T s a - In the instance declaration for `Ord (forall s. T s a)' + In the instance declaration for ‛Ord (forall s. T s a)’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail090.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail090.stderr index 3096b226c8..622e181401 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail090.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail090.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ tcfail090.hs:8:9: - Couldn't match kind `*' with `#' + Couldn't match kind ‛*’ with ‛#’ When matching types a0 :: * ByteArray# :: # In the expression: undefined - In an equation for `die': die _ = undefined + In an equation for ‛die’: die _ = undefined diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail092.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail092.stderr index 2ba048bb26..d1079d879e 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail092.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail092.stderr @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ tcfail092.hs:7:27: - Duplicate binding in parallel list comprehension for: `a' + Duplicate binding in parallel list comprehension for: ‛a’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail097.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail097.stderr index e7dadd4a6c..7b2b3aed89 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail097.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail097.stderr @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ -
-tcfail097.hs:5:6:
- Could not deduce (Eq a0) arising from the ambiguity check for `f'
- from the context (Eq a)
- bound by the type signature for f :: Eq a => Int -> Int
- at tcfail097.hs:5:6-23
- The type variable `a0' is ambiguous
- In the ambiguity check for: forall a. Eq a => Int -> Int
- In the type signature for `f': f :: Eq a => Int -> Int
+ +tcfail097.hs:5:6: + Could not deduce (Eq a0) arising from the ambiguity check for ‛f’ + from the context (Eq a) + bound by the type signature for f :: Eq a => Int -> Int + at tcfail097.hs:5:6-23 + The type variable ‛a0’ is ambiguous + In the ambiguity check for: forall a. Eq a => Int -> Int + In the type signature for ‛f’: f :: Eq a => Int -> Int diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail098.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail098.stderr index 8853e69326..cfb7aaf9b4 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail098.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail098.stderr @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ -
-tcfail098.hs:12:10:
- Could not deduce (Bar a0)
- arising from the ambiguity check for an instance declaration
- from the context (Bar a)
- bound by an instance declaration: Bar a => Bar Bool
- at tcfail098.hs:12:10-26
- The type variable `a0' is ambiguous
- In the ambiguity check for: forall a. Bar a => Bar Bool
- In the instance declaration for `Bar Bool'
+ +tcfail098.hs:12:10: + Could not deduce (Bar a0) + arising from the ambiguity check for an instance declaration + from the context (Bar a) + bound by an instance declaration: Bar a => Bar Bool + at tcfail098.hs:12:10-26 + The type variable ‛a0’ is ambiguous + In the ambiguity check for: forall a. Bar a => Bar Bool + In the instance declaration for ‛Bar Bool’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail099.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail099.stderr index 45531250b3..f4b77b770a 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail099.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail099.stderr @@ -1,16 +1,16 @@ tcfail099.hs:9:20: - Couldn't match expected type `a' with actual type `t' - because type variable `a' would escape its scope + Couldn't match expected type ‛a’ with actual type ‛t’ + because type variable ‛a’ would escape its scope This (rigid, skolem) type variable is bound by a pattern with constructor C :: forall a. (a -> Int) -> DS, - in an equation for `call' + in an equation for ‛call’ at tcfail099.hs:9:7-9 Relevant bindings include call :: DS -> t -> Int (bound at tcfail099.hs:9:1) f :: a -> Int (bound at tcfail099.hs:9:9) arg :: t (bound at tcfail099.hs:9:12) - In the first argument of `f', namely `arg' + In the first argument of ‛f’, namely ‛arg’ In the expression: f arg - In an equation for `call': call (C f) arg = f arg + In an equation for ‛call’: call (C f) arg = f arg diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail100.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail100.stderr index 885c8220b9..1e78076701 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail100.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail100.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -
-tcfail100.hs:7:1:
- Type synonym `A' should have 1 argument, but has been given none
- In the type declaration for `B'
+ +tcfail100.hs:7:1: + Type synonym ‛A’ should have 1 argument, but has been given none + In the type declaration for ‛B’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail101.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail101.stderr index 5cca6de0a3..f9b3f2f71f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail101.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail101.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ tcfail101.hs:9:6: - Type synonym `A' should have 1 argument, but has been given none - In the type signature for `f': f :: T A + Type synonym ‛A’ should have 1 argument, but has been given none + In the type signature for ‛f’: f :: T A diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail102.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail102.stderr index 516734b05d..1009fb4cca 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail102.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail102.stderr @@ -3,11 +3,11 @@ tcfail102.hs:1:14: Warning: -XDatatypeContexts is deprecated: It was widely considered a misfeature, and has been removed from the Haskell language. tcfail102.hs:9:15: - Could not deduce (Integral (Ratio a)) arising from a use of `p' + Could not deduce (Integral (Ratio a)) arising from a use of ‛p’ from the context (Integral a) bound by the type signature for f :: Integral a => P (Ratio a) -> P (Ratio a) at tcfail102.hs:8:6-45 - In the `p' field of a record + In the ‛p’ field of a record In the expression: x {p = p x} - In an equation for `f': f x = x {p = p x} + In an equation for ‛f’: f x = x {p = p x} diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail103.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail103.stderr index ea873e637f..ba581be12f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail103.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail103.stderr @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ tcfail103.hs:15:23: - Couldn't match type `t' with `s' - `t' is a rigid type variable bound by + Couldn't match type ‛t’ with ‛s’ + ‛t’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for f :: ST t Int at tcfail103.hs:10:5 - `s' is a rigid type variable bound by + ‛s’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for g :: ST s Int at tcfail103.hs:13:14 Expected type: STRef s Int Actual type: STRef t Int @@ -11,6 +11,6 @@ tcfail103.hs:15:23: f :: ST t Int (bound at tcfail103.hs:11:1) v :: STRef t Int (bound at tcfail103.hs:12:5) g :: ST s Int (bound at tcfail103.hs:15:9) - In the first argument of `readSTRef', namely `v' + In the first argument of ‛readSTRef’, namely ‛v’ In the expression: readSTRef v - In an equation for `g': g = readSTRef v + In an equation for ‛g’: g = readSTRef v diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail104.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail104.stderr index 5e6fc3bb1f..a32e413f6b 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail104.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail104.stderr @@ -1,15 +1,15 @@ tcfail104.hs:16:19: - Couldn't match expected type `Char -> Char' - with actual type `forall a. a -> a' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Char -> Char’ + with actual type ‛forall a. a -> a’ In the expression: x In the expression: (\ x -> x) In the expression: if v then (\ (x :: forall a. a -> a) -> x) else (\ x -> x) tcfail104.hs:22:39: - Couldn't match expected type `forall a. a -> a' - with actual type `a0 -> a0' + Couldn't match expected type ‛forall a. a -> a’ + with actual type ‛a0 -> a0’ In the expression: x In the expression: (\ (x :: forall a. a -> a) -> x) In the expression: diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail106.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail106.stderr index b08c7dfe89..2eeaf71979 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail106.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail106.stderr @@ -2,4 +2,4 @@ tcfail106.hs:14:10: No instance for (S Int) arising from the superclasses of an instance declaration - In the instance declaration for `D Int' + In the instance declaration for ‛D Int’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail107.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail107.stderr index 92a89b7544..b658814776 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail107.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail107.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ tcfail107.hs:13:9: - Type synonym `Const' should have 2 arguments, but has been given 1 - In the type signature for `test': + Type synonym ‛Const’ should have 2 arguments, but has been given 1 + In the type signature for ‛test’: test :: Thing (Const Int) -> Thing (Const Int) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail108.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail108.stderr index 56c97c20dd..f3c2415631 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail108.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail108.stderr @@ -4,4 +4,4 @@ tcfail108.hs:7:10: (Use -XFlexibleContexts to permit this) In the context: (Eq (f (Rec f))) While checking an instance declaration - In the instance declaration for `Eq (Rec f)' + In the instance declaration for ‛Eq (Rec f)’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail109.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail109.stderr index 5455815409..4b59607186 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail109.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail109.stderr @@ -2,4 +2,4 @@ tcfail109.hs:16:10: No instance for (Eq Stupid) arising from the superclasses of an instance declaration - In the instance declaration for `Collects Bool Stupid' + In the instance declaration for ‛Collects Bool Stupid’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail110.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail110.stderr index 91ba52195d..840dc29dee 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail110.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail110.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ tcfail110.hs:8:30: - Expecting one more argument to `Foo a' - Expected a type, but `Foo a' has kind `* -> *' - In the type signature for `bar': + Expecting one more argument to ‛Foo a’ + Expected a type, but ‛Foo a’ has kind ‛* -> *’ + In the type signature for ‛bar’: bar :: String -> (forall a. Foo a) -> IO () diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail112.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail112.stderr index 602c1e4b69..70cd77bca3 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail112.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail112.stderr @@ -1,15 +1,15 @@ tcfail112.hs:11:6: - Constructor `S' does not have the required strict field(s): y + Constructor ‛S’ does not have the required strict field(s): y In the expression: S {} - In an equation for `s1': s1 = S {} + In an equation for ‛s1’: s1 = S {} tcfail112.hs:12:6: - Constructor `S' does not have the required strict field(s): y + Constructor ‛S’ does not have the required strict field(s): y In the expression: S {x = 3} - In an equation for `s2': s2 = S {x = 3} + In an equation for ‛s2’: s2 = S {x = 3} tcfail112.hs:14:6: - Constructor `T' does not have the required strict field(s) + Constructor ‛T’ does not have the required strict field(s) In the expression: T {} - In an equation for `t': t = T {} + In an equation for ‛t’: t = T {} diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail113.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail113.stderr index 2584b46bda..f9314f5dcc 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail113.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail113.stderr @@ -1,14 +1,14 @@ tcfail113.hs:12:7: - Expecting one more argument to `Maybe' - Expected kind `*', but `Maybe' has kind `* -> *' - In the type signature for `f': f :: [Maybe] + Expecting one more argument to ‛Maybe’ + Expected kind ‛*’, but ‛Maybe’ has kind ‛* -> *’ + In the type signature for ‛f’: f :: [Maybe] tcfail113.hs:15:8: - The first argument of `T' should have kind `* -> *', - but `Int' has kind `*' - In the type signature for `g': g :: T Int + The first argument of ‛T’ should have kind ‛* -> *’, + but ‛Int’ has kind ‛*’ + In the type signature for ‛g’: g :: T Int tcfail113.hs:18:6: - `Int' is applied to too many type arguments - In the type signature for `h': h :: Int Int + ‛Int’ is applied to too many type arguments + In the type signature for ‛h’: h :: Int Int diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail114.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail114.stderr index 601feff85b..41c8a65cec 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail114.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail114.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ tcfail114.hs:11:20: - `foo' is not a record selector + ‛foo’ is not a record selector In the expression: undefined {foo = ()} - In an equation for `test': test = undefined {foo = ()} + In an equation for ‛test’: test = undefined {foo = ()} diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail116.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail116.stderr index 8e7372413a..d49438dd97 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail116.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail116.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ tcfail116.hs:5:1: - The class method `bug' + The class method ‛bug’ mentions none of the type variables of the class Foo a When checking the class method: bug :: () - In the class declaration for `Foo' + In the class declaration for ‛Foo’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail117.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail117.stderr index c7be9199c5..40a14e7f20 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail117.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail117.stderr @@ -1,13 +1,13 @@ -
-tcfail117.hs:5:32:
- Can't make a derived instance of `Enum N1':
- `N1' must be an enumeration type
- (an enumeration consists of one or more nullary, non-GADT constructors)
- Try -XGeneralizedNewtypeDeriving for GHC's newtype-deriving extension
- In the newtype declaration for `N1'
-
-tcfail117.hs:6:32:
- Can't make a derived instance of `Enum N2':
- `N2' must be an enumeration type
- (an enumeration consists of one or more nullary, non-GADT constructors)
- In the data declaration for `N2'
+ +tcfail117.hs:5:32: + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Enum N1’: + ‛N1’ must be an enumeration type + (an enumeration consists of one or more nullary, non-GADT constructors) + Try -XGeneralizedNewtypeDeriving for GHC's newtype-deriving extension + In the newtype declaration for ‛N1’ + +tcfail117.hs:6:32: + Can't make a derived instance of ‛Enum N2’: + ‛N2’ must be an enumeration type + (an enumeration consists of one or more nullary, non-GADT constructors) + In the data declaration for ‛N2’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail119.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail119.stderr index 1984617b2b..45a1bc7707 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail119.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail119.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ tcfail119.hs:11:8: - Couldn't match expected type `Bool' with actual type `[Char]' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Bool’ with actual type ‛[Char]’ In the pattern: "Foo" - In an equation for `b': b x "Foo" = () + In an equation for ‛b’: b x "Foo" = () diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail121.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail121.stderr index 700dbb861a..7ac388aa16 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail121.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail121.stderr @@ -1,13 +1,12 @@ tcfail121.hs:13:9: - Overlapping instances for Foo [a] - arising from a use of `op' + Overlapping instances for Foo [a] arising from a use of ‛op’ Matching instances: instance [overlap ok] Foo a => Foo [a] -- Defined at tcfail121.hs:9:10 instance [overlap ok] Foo [Int] -- Defined at tcfail121.hs:10:10 - (The choice depends on the instantiation of `a' + (The choice depends on the instantiation of ‛a’ To pick the first instance above, use -XIncoherentInstances when compiling the other instance declarations) In the expression: op x - In an equation for `foo': foo x = op x + In an equation for ‛foo’: foo x = op x diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail122.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail122.stderr index d083321162..ec0f6a33bd 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail122.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail122.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ tcfail122.hs:8:9: - Couldn't match kind `* -> *' with `*' + Couldn't match kind ‛* -> *’ with ‛*’ When matching types d0 :: * -> * b :: * @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ tcfail122.hs:8:9: In the expression: [undefined :: forall a b. a b, undefined :: forall (c :: (* -> *) -> *) (d :: * -> *). c d] - In an equation for `foo': + In an equation for ‛foo’: foo = [undefined :: forall a b. a b, undefined :: forall (c :: (* -> *) -> *) (d :: * -> *). c d] diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail123.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail123.stderr index 1ca291fd96..2a70414aaf 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail123.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail123.stderr @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ tcfail123.hs:11:9: - Couldn't match kind `*' with `#' + Couldn't match kind ‛*’ with ‛#’ When matching types t0 :: * GHC.Prim.Int# :: # - In the first argument of `f', namely `3#' + In the first argument of ‛f’, namely ‛3#’ In the expression: f 3# - In an equation for `h': h v = f 3# + In an equation for ‛h’: h v = f 3# diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail125.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail125.stderr index addd093bff..592698f7d4 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail125.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail125.stderr @@ -3,9 +3,9 @@ tcfail125.hs:1:14: Warning: -XDatatypeContexts is deprecated: It was widely considered a misfeature, and has been removed from the Haskell language. tcfail125.hs:11:4: - No instance for (Show a) arising from a use of `LiftObs' + No instance for (Show a) arising from a use of ‛LiftObs’ Possible fix: add (Show a) to the context of the type signature for f :: Obs a -> String In the pattern: LiftObs _ _ - In an equation for `f': f (LiftObs _ _) = "yes" + In an equation for ‛f’: f (LiftObs _ _) = "yes" diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail127.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail127.stderr index 021120314f..c7d41534aa 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail127.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail127.stderr @@ -2,4 +2,4 @@ tcfail127.hs:3:8: Illegal polymorphic or qualified type: Num a => a -> a Perhaps you intended to use -XImpredicativeTypes - In the type signature for `foo': foo :: IO (Num a => a -> a) + In the type signature for ‛foo’: foo :: IO (Num a => a -> a) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail128.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail128.stderr index 9a1564fb85..38ae102d99 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail128.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail128.stderr @@ -1,21 +1,21 @@ -
-tcfail128.hs:18:16:
- No instance for (Data.Array.Base.MArray b0 FlatVector IO)
- arising from a use of `thaw'
- The type variable `b0' is ambiguous
- Note: there is a potential instance available:
- instance Data.Array.Base.MArray GHC.IOArray.IOArray e IO
- -- Defined in `Data.Array.Base'
- In a stmt of a 'do' block: v <- thaw tmp
- In the expression:
- do { let sL = ...
- dim = length sL
- ....;
- v <- thaw tmp;
- return () }
- In an equation for `main':
- main
- = do { let sL = ...
- ....;
- v <- thaw tmp;
- return () }
+ +tcfail128.hs:18:16: + No instance for (Data.Array.Base.MArray b0 FlatVector IO) + arising from a use of ‛thaw’ + The type variable ‛b0’ is ambiguous + Note: there is a potential instance available: + instance Data.Array.Base.MArray GHC.IOArray.IOArray e IO + -- Defined in ‛Data.Array.Base’ + In a stmt of a 'do' block: v <- thaw tmp + In the expression: + do { let sL = ... + dim = length sL + ....; + v <- thaw tmp; + return () } + In an equation for ‛main’: + main + = do { let sL = ... + ....; + v <- thaw tmp; + return () } diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail129.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail129.stderr index f6ee765ce4..0bffcbf76f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail129.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail129.stderr @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ tcfail129.hs:12:21: - Type synonym `Foo' should have 1 argument, but has been given none + Type synonym ‛Foo’ should have 1 argument, but has been given none In an expression type signature: Bar Foo In the expression: undefined :: Bar Foo - In an equation for `blah': blah = undefined :: Bar Foo + In an equation for ‛blah’: blah = undefined :: Bar Foo tcfail129.hs:17:22: - Type synonym `Foo1' should have 1 argument, but has been given none + Type synonym ‛Foo1’ should have 1 argument, but has been given none In an expression type signature: Bar1 Foo1 In the expression: undefined :: Bar1 Foo1 - In an equation for `blah1': blah1 = undefined :: Bar1 Foo1 + In an equation for ‛blah1’: blah1 = undefined :: Bar1 Foo1 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail130.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail130.stderr index 3534dba679..37f3614b5f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail130.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail130.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ tcfail130.hs:10:7: - Unbound implicit parameter (?x::Int) - arising from a use of `woggle' + Unbound implicit parameter (?x::Int) arising from a use of ‛woggle’ In the expression: woggle 3 - In an equation for `foo': foo = woggle 3 + In an equation for ‛foo’: foo = woggle 3 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail131.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail131.stderr index db2a954d57..7cdcb6f2f9 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail131.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail131.stderr @@ -4,11 +4,11 @@ tcfail131.hs:7:9: from the context (Num b) bound by the type signature for g :: Num b => b -> b at tcfail131.hs:6:8-22 - `b' is a rigid type variable bound by + ‛b’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for g :: Num b => b -> b at tcfail131.hs:6:8 Relevant bindings include g :: b -> b (bound at tcfail131.hs:7:3) x :: b (bound at tcfail131.hs:7:5) - In the return type of a call of `f' + In the return type of a call of ‛f’ In the expression: f x x - In an equation for `g': g x = f x x + In an equation for ‛g’: g x = f x x diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail132.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail132.stderr index 91228b86b5..8440cc89ab 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail132.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail132.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ tcfail132.hs:17:37: - The first argument of `T' should have kind `* -> * -> * -> *', - but `Object f' f t' has kind `* -> * -> *' - In the type `T (Object f' f t) (DUnit t)' - In the type declaration for `LiftObject' + The first argument of ‛T’ should have kind ‛* -> * -> * -> *’, + but ‛Object f' f t’ has kind ‛* -> * -> *’ + In the type ‛T (Object f' f t) (DUnit t)’ + In the type declaration for ‛LiftObject’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail133.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail133.stderr index 4a7c564b3b..72eafd88d7 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail133.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail133.stderr @@ -1,26 +1,26 @@ -
-tcfail133.hs:2:61: Warning:
- -XDatatypeContexts is deprecated: It was widely considered a misfeature, and has been removed from the Haskell language.
-
-tcfail133.hs:68:7:
- No instance for (Show s0) arising from a use of `show'
- The type variable `s0' is ambiguous
- Note: there are several potential instances:
- instance Show Zero -- Defined at tcfail133.hs:8:29
- instance Show One -- Defined at tcfail133.hs:9:28
- instance (Show a, Show b, Number a, Digit b) => Show (a :@ b)
- -- Defined at tcfail133.hs:11:54
- ...plus 26 others
- In the expression: show
- In the expression: show $ add (One :@ Zero) (One :@ One)
- In an equation for `foo':
- foo = show $ add (One :@ Zero) (One :@ One)
-
-tcfail133.hs:68:14:
- No instance for (AddDigit (Zero :@ (One :@ One)) One s0)
- arising from a use of `add'
- In the second argument of `($)', namely
- `add (One :@ Zero) (One :@ One)'
- In the expression: show $ add (One :@ Zero) (One :@ One)
- In an equation for `foo':
- foo = show $ add (One :@ Zero) (One :@ One)
+ +tcfail133.hs:2:61: Warning: + -XDatatypeContexts is deprecated: It was widely considered a misfeature, and has been removed from the Haskell language. + +tcfail133.hs:68:7: + No instance for (Show s0) arising from a use of ‛show’ + The type variable ‛s0’ is ambiguous + Note: there are several potential instances: + instance Show Zero -- Defined at tcfail133.hs:8:29 + instance Show One -- Defined at tcfail133.hs:9:28 + instance (Show a, Show b, Number a, Digit b) => Show (a :@ b) + -- Defined at tcfail133.hs:11:54 + ...plus 26 others + In the expression: show + In the expression: show $ add (One :@ Zero) (One :@ One) + In an equation for ‛foo’: + foo = show $ add (One :@ Zero) (One :@ One) + +tcfail133.hs:68:14: + No instance for (AddDigit (Zero :@ (One :@ One)) One s0) + arising from a use of ‛add’ + In the second argument of ‛($)’, namely + ‛add (One :@ Zero) (One :@ One)’ + In the expression: show $ add (One :@ Zero) (One :@ One) + In an equation for ‛foo’: + foo = show $ add (One :@ Zero) (One :@ One) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail134.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail134.stderr index 721a2f3312..7ba9620092 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail134.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail134.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ tcfail134.hs:5:33: - Expecting one more argument to `XML' - Expected a type, but `XML' has kind `* -> Constraint' - In the type `a -> XML' - In the class declaration for `XML' + Expecting one more argument to ‛XML’ + Expected a type, but ‛XML’ has kind ‛* -> Constraint’ + In the type ‛a -> XML’ + In the class declaration for ‛XML’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail135.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail135.stderr index 6e6379f63e..33712e3a98 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail135.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail135.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ tcfail135.hs:6:23: - Expecting one more argument to `f' - Expected a type, but `f' has kind `k0 -> *' - In the type `f a -> f' - In the class declaration for `Foo' + Expecting one more argument to ‛f’ + Expected a type, but ‛f’ has kind ‛k0 -> *’ + In the type ‛f a -> f’ + In the class declaration for ‛Foo’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail136.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail136.stderr index 745aac23cf..c2cb9d9cf8 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail136.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail136.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ tcfail136.hs:9:35: - Expecting one more argument to `SymDict' - Expected a type, but `SymDict' has kind `* -> *' - In the type `SymDict' - In the definition of data constructor `SymTable' - In the data declaration for `SymTable' + Expecting one more argument to ‛SymDict’ + Expected a type, but ‛SymDict’ has kind ‛* -> *’ + In the type ‛SymDict’ + In the definition of data constructor ‛SymTable’ + In the data declaration for ‛SymTable’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail137.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail137.stderr index b84fff1dfa..05890e0b7d 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail137.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail137.stderr @@ -3,6 +3,6 @@ tcfail137.hs:1:14: Warning: -XDatatypeContexts is deprecated: It was widely considered a misfeature, and has been removed from the Haskell language. tcfail137.hs:8:5: - No instance for (Floating Bool) arising from a use of `Test' + No instance for (Floating Bool) arising from a use of ‛Test’ In the expression: Test [False, True] - In an equation for `x': x = Test [False, True] + In an equation for ‛x’: x = Test [False, True] diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail139.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail139.stderr index 91559a9f68..bfdc89b4fd 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail139.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail139.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ tcfail139.hs:6:10: - Illegal instance declaration for `Bounded Foo' - (All instance types must be of the form (T t1 ... tn) - where T is not a synonym. - Use -XTypeSynonymInstances if you want to disable this.) - In the instance declaration for `Bounded Foo' + Illegal instance declaration for ‛Bounded Foo’ + (All instance types must be of the form (T t1 ... tn) + where T is not a synonym. + Use -XTypeSynonymInstances if you want to disable this.) + In the instance declaration for ‛Bounded Foo’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail140.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail140.stderr index 4315837a2e..aff19cb16a 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail140.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail140.stderr @@ -1,38 +1,38 @@ tcfail140.hs:10:7: - Couldn't match expected type `a0 -> t' with actual type `Int' + Couldn't match expected type ‛a0 -> t’ with actual type ‛Int’ Relevant bindings include bar :: t (bound at tcfail140.hs:10:1) - The function `f' is applied to two arguments, - but its type `Int -> Int' has only one + The function ‛f’ is applied to two arguments, + but its type ‛Int -> Int’ has only one In the expression: f 3 9 - In an equation for `bar': bar = f 3 9 + In an equation for ‛bar’: bar = f 3 9 tcfail140.hs:12:10: - Couldn't match expected type `a1 -> t1' with actual type `Int' + Couldn't match expected type ‛a1 -> t1’ with actual type ‛Int’ Relevant bindings include rot :: t -> t1 (bound at tcfail140.hs:12:1) - The operator `f' takes two arguments, - but its type `Int -> Int' has only one + The operator ‛f’ takes two arguments, + but its type ‛Int -> Int’ has only one In the expression: 3 `f` 4 - In an equation for `rot': rot xs = 3 `f` 4 + In an equation for ‛rot’: rot xs = 3 `f` 4 tcfail140.hs:14:15: - Couldn't match expected type `a -> b' with actual type `Int' + Couldn't match expected type ‛a -> b’ with actual type ‛Int’ Relevant bindings include bot :: [a] -> [b] (bound at tcfail140.hs:14:1) xs :: [a] (bound at tcfail140.hs:14:5) - The operator `f' takes two arguments, - but its type `Int -> Int' has only one - In the first argument of `map', namely `(3 `f`)' + The operator ‛f’ takes two arguments, + but its type ‛Int -> Int’ has only one + In the first argument of ‛map’, namely ‛(3 `f`)’ In the expression: map (3 `f`) xs tcfail140.hs:16:8: - Constructor `Just' should have 1 argument, but has been given none + Constructor ‛Just’ should have 1 argument, but has been given none In the pattern: Just In the expression: (\ Just x -> x) :: Maybe a -> a In the expression: ((\ Just x -> x) :: Maybe a -> a) (Just 1) tcfail140.hs:19:1: - Couldn't match expected type `t0 -> Bool' with actual type `Int' - The equation(s) for `g' have two arguments, - but its type `Int -> Int' has only one + Couldn't match expected type ‛t0 -> Bool’ with actual type ‛Int’ + The equation(s) for ‛g’ have two arguments, + but its type ‛Int -> Int’ has only one diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail142.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail142.stderr index e0ec8f4ca1..767598e2b7 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail142.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail142.stderr @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ -
-tcfail142.hs:18:8:
- Could not deduce (Bar a0 r)
- arising from the ambiguity check for `bar'
- from the context (Bar a r)
- bound by the type signature for bar :: Bar a r => r -> ()
- at tcfail142.hs:18:8-25
- The type variable `a0' is ambiguous
- In the ambiguity check for: forall r a. Bar a r => r -> ()
- In the type signature for `bar': bar :: Bar a r => r -> ()
+ +tcfail142.hs:18:8: + Could not deduce (Bar a0 r) + arising from the ambiguity check for ‛bar’ + from the context (Bar a r) + bound by the type signature for bar :: Bar a r => r -> () + at tcfail142.hs:18:8-25 + The type variable ‛a0’ is ambiguous + In the ambiguity check for: forall r a. Bar a r => r -> () + In the type signature for ‛bar’: bar :: Bar a r => r -> () diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail143.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail143.stderr index 846f8c0252..dadccbe781 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail143.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail143.stderr @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ tcfail143.hs:29:9: - Couldn't match type `S Z' with `Z' + Couldn't match type ‛S Z’ with ‛Z’ When using functional dependencies to combine MinMax a Z Z a, - arising from the dependency `a b -> c d' + arising from the dependency ‛a b -> c d’ in the instance declaration at tcfail143.hs:11:10 MinMax (S Z) Z Z Z, - arising from a use of `extend' at tcfail143.hs:29:9-16 + arising from a use of ‛extend’ at tcfail143.hs:29:9-16 In the expression: n1 `extend` n0 - In an equation for `t2': t2 = n1 `extend` n0 + In an equation for ‛t2’: t2 = n1 `extend` n0 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail146.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail146.stderr index 5b835c1a37..b62824e8cb 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail146.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail146.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ tcfail146.hs:7:22: - Expected a type, but `SClass a' has kind `Constraint' - In the type `SClass a' - In the definition of data constructor `SCon' - In the data declaration for `SData' + Expected a type, but ‛SClass a’ has kind ‛Constraint’ + In the type ‛SClass a’ + In the definition of data constructor ‛SCon’ + In the data declaration for ‛SData’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail147.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail147.stderr index cda7223923..b7e75b06b2 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail147.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail147.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ tcfail147.hs:7:19: - Expecting one more argument to `XClass' - Expected a type, but `XClass' has kind `k0 -> Constraint' - In the type `XClass' - In the definition of data constructor `XCon' - In the data declaration for `XData' + Expecting one more argument to ‛XClass’ + Expected a type, but ‛XClass’ has kind ‛k0 -> Constraint’ + In the type ‛XClass’ + In the definition of data constructor ‛XCon’ + In the data declaration for ‛XData’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail148.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail148.stderr index 22073f51c2..cfa81e5b0a 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail148.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail148.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -
-tcfail148.hs:5:28:
- Expecting one more argument to `List'
- Expected a type, but `List' has kind `* -> *'
- In the type `List'
- In the definition of data constructor `Cons'
- In the data declaration for `List'
+ +tcfail148.hs:5:28: + Expecting one more argument to ‛List’ + Expected a type, but ‛List’ has kind ‛* -> *’ + In the type ‛List’ + In the definition of data constructor ‛Cons’ + In the data declaration for ‛List’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail151.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail151.stderr index f1884f3d32..d0dd7960b5 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail151.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail151.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ -
-tcfail151.hs:1:14: Warning:
- -XDatatypeContexts is deprecated: It was widely considered a misfeature, and has been removed from the Haskell language.
-
-tcfail151.hs:8:6:
- Expecting one more argument to `Name a'
- Expected a constraint, but `Name a' has kind `* -> Constraint'
- In the data declaration for `Exp'
+ +tcfail151.hs:1:14: Warning: + -XDatatypeContexts is deprecated: It was widely considered a misfeature, and has been removed from the Haskell language. + +tcfail151.hs:8:6: + Expecting one more argument to ‛Name a’ + Expected a constraint, but ‛Name a’ has kind ‛* -> Constraint’ + In the data declaration for ‛Exp’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail152.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail152.stderr index 24a872c9ee..507587d072 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail152.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail152.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ tcfail152.hs:10:14: - No instance for (Integral a) arising from a use of `toInteger' + No instance for (Integral a) arising from a use of ‛toInteger’ Possible fix: - add (Integral a) to the context of the data constructor `C' + add (Integral a) to the context of the data constructor ‛C’ In the expression: toInteger x - In an equation for `test': test (C x) = toInteger x + In an equation for ‛test’: test (C x) = toInteger x diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail153.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail153.stderr index 2647156f87..ba1da78d4e 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail153.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail153.stderr @@ -1,16 +1,16 @@ tcfail153.hs:6:7: - Couldn't match type `a' with `Bool' - `a' is a rigid type variable bound by + Couldn't match type ‛a’ with ‛Bool’ + ‛a’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for f :: a -> [a] at tcfail153.hs:5:6 Expected type: [a] Actual type: [Bool] Relevant bindings include f :: a -> [a] (bound at tcfail153.hs:6:1) x :: a (bound at tcfail153.hs:6:3) - In the return type of a call of `g' + In the return type of a call of ‛g’ In the expression: g x - In an equation for `f': + In an equation for ‛f’: f x = g x where diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail154.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail154.stderr index ca8a2978f1..8977eacc74 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail154.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail154.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ -
-tcfail154.hs:12:10:
- Variable `a' occurs more often than in the instance head
- in the constraint: C a a
- (Use -XUndecidableInstances to permit this)
- In the instance declaration for `Eq (T a)'
+ +tcfail154.hs:12:10: + Variable ‛a’ occurs more often than in the instance head + in the constraint: C a a + (Use -XUndecidableInstances to permit this) + In the instance declaration for ‛Eq (T a)’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail155.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail155.stderr index 1b5f1f3b0e..58426f4150 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail155.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail155.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ -
-tcfail155.hs:8:6:
- Data constructor `P' returns type `L2'
- instead of an instance of its parent type `T a'
- In the definition of data constructor `P'
- In the data declaration for `T'
+ +tcfail155.hs:8:6: + Data constructor ‛P’ returns type ‛L2’ + instead of an instance of its parent type ‛T a’ + In the definition of data constructor ‛P’ + In the data declaration for ‛T’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail156.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail156.stderr index d93549e136..7e84020fb2 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail156.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail156.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ tcfail156.hs:7:26: A newtype constructor cannot have an existential context, - but `Foo' does - In the definition of data constructor `Foo' - In the newtype declaration for `Foo' + but ‛Foo’ does + In the definition of data constructor ‛Foo’ + In the newtype declaration for ‛Foo’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail157.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail157.stderr index 304b76511a..cfca878ed0 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail157.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail157.stderr @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ -
-tcfail157.hs:27:10:
- Variable `b' occurs more often than in the instance head
- in the constraint: E m a b
- (Use -XUndecidableInstances to permit this)
- In the instance declaration for `Foo m (a -> ())'
-
-tcfail157.hs:27:10:
- Variable `b' occurs more often than in the instance head
- in the constraint: Foo m b
- (Use -XUndecidableInstances to permit this)
- In the instance declaration for `Foo m (a -> ())'
+ +tcfail157.hs:27:10: + Variable ‛b’ occurs more often than in the instance head + in the constraint: E m a b + (Use -XUndecidableInstances to permit this) + In the instance declaration for ‛Foo m (a -> ())’ + +tcfail157.hs:27:10: + Variable ‛b’ occurs more often than in the instance head + in the constraint: Foo m b + (Use -XUndecidableInstances to permit this) + In the instance declaration for ‛Foo m (a -> ())’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail158.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail158.stderr index 46385716fb..47e05a5c77 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail158.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail158.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ tcfail158.hs:14:19: - Expecting one more argument to `Val v' - Expected a type, but `Val v' has kind `* -> *' - In the type signature for `bar': bar :: forall v. Val v + Expecting one more argument to ‛Val v’ + Expected a type, but ‛Val v’ has kind ‛* -> *’ + In the type signature for ‛bar’: bar :: forall v. Val v diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail159.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail159.stderr index 3576c7e24a..3ff73d8c72 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail159.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail159.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ tcfail159.hs:9:11: - Couldn't match kind `*' with `#' + Couldn't match kind ‛*’ with ‛#’ When matching types t0 :: * (# Int, Int #) :: # diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail160.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail160.stderr index 1be65a6038..4d3a01fe17 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail160.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail160.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ tcfail160.hs:7:8: - The first argument of `T' should have kind `* -> *', - but `Int' has kind `*' - In the type signature for `g': g :: T Int + The first argument of ‛T’ should have kind ‛* -> *’, + but ‛Int’ has kind ‛*’ + In the type signature for ‛g’: g :: T Int diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail161.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail161.stderr index 21d8c1b060..79ca81dfaa 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail161.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail161.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ tcfail161.hs:5:7: - Expecting one more argument to `Maybe' - Expected kind `*', but `Maybe' has kind `* -> *' - In the type signature for `f': f :: [Maybe] + Expecting one more argument to ‛Maybe’ + Expected kind ‛*’, but ‛Maybe’ has kind ‛* -> *’ + In the type signature for ‛f’: f :: [Maybe] diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail162.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail162.stderr index 2563233b78..c14956e6b3 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail162.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail162.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -
-tcfail162.hs:10:33:
- Expecting one more argument to `ForeignPtr'
- Expected a type, but `ForeignPtr' has kind `* -> *'
- In the type `ForeignPtr'
- In the definition of data constructor `Foo'
- In the data declaration for `Foo'
+ +tcfail162.hs:10:33: + Expecting one more argument to ‛ForeignPtr’ + Expected a type, but ‛ForeignPtr’ has kind ‛* -> *’ + In the type ‛ForeignPtr’ + In the definition of data constructor ‛Foo’ + In the data declaration for ‛Foo’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail164.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail164.stderr index 65f9c9f9ac..4a3be9027b 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail164.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail164.stderr @@ -4,12 +4,12 @@ tcfail164.hs:11:5: Specify the type by giving a type signature e.g. (tagToEnum# x) :: Bool In the expression: tagToEnum# 0# - In an equation for `f': f = tagToEnum# 0# + In an equation for ‛f’: f = tagToEnum# 0# tcfail164.hs:17:34: Bad call to tagToEnum# at type Int Result type must be an enumeration type In the expression: tagToEnum# value# - In an equation for `readUnboxable': + In an equation for ‛readUnboxable’: readUnboxable (I# value#) = tagToEnum# value# - In the instance declaration for `Unboxable Int' + In the instance declaration for ‛Unboxable Int’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail165.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail165.stderr index 878a707120..09f359f834 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail165.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail165.stderr @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ tcfail165.hs:15:23: - Couldn't match expected type `forall a. Show a => a -> String' - with actual type `b0 -> String' - In the second argument of `putMVar', namely - `(show :: forall b. Show b => b -> String)' + Couldn't match expected type ‛forall a. Show a => a -> String’ + with actual type ‛b0 -> String’ + In the second argument of ‛putMVar’, namely + ‛(show :: forall b. Show b => b -> String)’ In a stmt of a 'do' block: - putMVar var (show :: forall b. Show b => b -> String) + putMVar var (show :: forall b. Show b => b -> String) In the expression: do { var <- newEmptyMVar :: IO (MVar (forall a. Show a => a -> String)); diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail167.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail167.stderr index f62f524ebd..1613d4efad 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail167.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail167.stderr @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ tcfail167.hs:14:14: - Couldn't match type `Char' with `Float' + Couldn't match type ‛Char’ with ‛Float’ Inaccessible code in a pattern with constructor C2 :: T Float, - in an equation for `inaccessible' + in an equation for ‛inaccessible’ In the pattern: C2 - In an equation for `inaccessible': inaccessible C2 = ' ' + In an equation for ‛inaccessible’: inaccessible C2 = ' ' diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail168.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail168.stderr index a6a5064562..99cd5a129f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail168.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail168.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ tcfail168.hs:7:11: - Couldn't match expected type `IO a0' - with actual type `Char -> IO ()' + Couldn't match expected type ‛IO a0’ + with actual type ‛Char -> IO ()’ In a stmt of a 'do' block: putChar In the expression: do { putChar; @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ tcfail168.hs:7:11: putChar 'a'; putChar 'a'; .... } - In an equation for `foo': + In an equation for ‛foo’: foo = do { putChar; putChar 'a'; diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail170.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail170.stderr index 914ab0cde0..7e8f0116ec 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail170.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail170.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ tcfail170.hs:7:10: - Illegal instance declaration for `C [p] [q]' - (the Coverage Condition fails for one of the functional dependencies; - Use -XUndecidableInstances to permit this) - In the instance declaration for `C [p] [q]' + Illegal instance declaration for ‛C [p] [q]’ + (the Coverage Condition fails for one of the functional dependencies; + Use -XUndecidableInstances to permit this) + In the instance declaration for ‛C [p] [q]’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail171.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail171.stderr index 79ed5f80b7..e42b06ad08 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail171.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail171.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ tcfail171.hs:9:10: - No instance for (PrintfArg a) arising from a use of `printf' + No instance for (PrintfArg a) arising from a use of ‛printf’ Possible fix: add (PrintfArg a) to the context of the type signature for phex :: a -> b In the expression: printf "0x%x" x - In an equation for `phex': phex x = printf "0x%x" x + In an equation for ‛phex’: phex x = printf "0x%x" x diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail173.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail173.stderr index 4bda7d5c4c..362f3ca288 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail173.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail173.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ tcfail173.hs:5:12: - Illegal declaration of a type or class operator `<.>' + Illegal declaration of a type or class operator ‛<.>’ Use -XTypeOperators to declare operators in type and declarations diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail174.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail174.stderr index d093e32385..56442b867f 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail174.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail174.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ tcfail174.hs:9:10: - Couldn't match expected type `forall a. a -> a' - with actual type `a0 -> a0' - In the first argument of `Base', namely `id' + Couldn't match expected type ‛forall a. a -> a’ + with actual type ‛a0 -> a0’ + In the first argument of ‛Base’, namely ‛id’ In the expression: Base id - In an equation for `g': g = Base id + In an equation for ‛g’: g = Base id diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail175.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail175.stderr index 65f4cb9e4d..6d0c103153 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail175.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail175.stderr @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ tcfail175.hs:11:1: - Couldn't match expected type `String -> String -> String' - with actual type `a' - `a' is a rigid type variable bound by + Couldn't match expected type ‛String -> String -> String’ + with actual type ‛a’ + ‛a’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for evalRHS :: Int -> a at tcfail175.hs:10:12 Relevant bindings include evalRHS :: Int -> a (bound at tcfail175.hs:11:1) - The equation(s) for `evalRHS' have three arguments, - but its type `Int -> a' has only one + The equation(s) for ‛evalRHS’ have three arguments, + but its type ‛Int -> a’ has only one diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail176.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail176.stderr index f804b000cf..cb829b43af 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail176.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail176.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ tcfail176.hs:7:21: - Data constructor `Bug' returns type `Maybe a' - instead of an instance of its parent type `Bug a' - In the definition of data constructor `Bug' - In the newtype declaration for `Bug' + Data constructor ‛Bug’ returns type ‛Maybe a’ + instead of an instance of its parent type ‛Bug a’ + In the definition of data constructor ‛Bug’ + In the newtype declaration for ‛Bug’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail177.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail177.stderr index dc622daafa..5ef31f8d34 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail177.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail177.stderr @@ -1,171 +1,171 @@ tcfail177.hs:10:12: - Couldn't match expected type `Bool' with actual type `Int' - In the return type of a call of `foo' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Bool’ with actual type ‛Int’ + In the return type of a call of ‛foo’ In the expression: foo [a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....] - In an equation for `allTests': + In an equation for ‛allTests’: allTests = foo [a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", ....] tcfail177.hs:20:13: - Couldn't match expected type `Bool' with actual type `[Char]' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Bool’ with actual type ‛[Char]’ In the expression: "Two" - In the first argument of `foo', namely - `[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]' + In the first argument of ‛foo’, namely + ‛[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]’ In the expression: foo [a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....] tcfail177.hs:20:20: - Couldn't match expected type `Bool' with actual type `[Char]' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Bool’ with actual type ‛[Char]’ In the expression: "Two" - In the first argument of `foo', namely - `[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]' + In the first argument of ‛foo’, namely + ‛[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]’ In the expression: foo [a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....] tcfail177.hs:20:27: - Couldn't match expected type `Bool' with actual type `[Char]' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Bool’ with actual type ‛[Char]’ In the expression: "Two" - In the first argument of `foo', namely - `[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]' + In the first argument of ‛foo’, namely + ‛[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]’ In the expression: foo [a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....] tcfail177.hs:21:13: - Couldn't match expected type `Bool' with actual type `[Char]' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Bool’ with actual type ‛[Char]’ In the expression: "Two" - In the first argument of `foo', namely - `[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]' + In the first argument of ‛foo’, namely + ‛[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]’ In the expression: foo [a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....] tcfail177.hs:21:20: - Couldn't match expected type `Bool' with actual type `[Char]' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Bool’ with actual type ‛[Char]’ In the expression: "Two" - In the first argument of `foo', namely - `[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]' + In the first argument of ‛foo’, namely + ‛[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]’ In the expression: foo [a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....] tcfail177.hs:21:27: - Couldn't match expected type `Bool' with actual type `[Char]' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Bool’ with actual type ‛[Char]’ In the expression: "Two" - In the first argument of `foo', namely - `[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]' + In the first argument of ‛foo’, namely + ‛[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]’ In the expression: foo [a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....] tcfail177.hs:22:13: - Couldn't match expected type `Bool' with actual type `[Char]' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Bool’ with actual type ‛[Char]’ In the expression: "Two" - In the first argument of `foo', namely - `[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]' + In the first argument of ‛foo’, namely + ‛[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]’ In the expression: foo [a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....] tcfail177.hs:22:20: - Couldn't match expected type `Bool' with actual type `[Char]' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Bool’ with actual type ‛[Char]’ In the expression: "Two" - In the first argument of `foo', namely - `[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]' + In the first argument of ‛foo’, namely + ‛[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]’ In the expression: foo [a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....] tcfail177.hs:22:27: - Couldn't match expected type `Bool' with actual type `[Char]' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Bool’ with actual type ‛[Char]’ In the expression: "Two" - In the first argument of `foo', namely - `[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]' + In the first argument of ‛foo’, namely + ‛[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]’ In the expression: foo [a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....] tcfail177.hs:23:13: - Couldn't match expected type `Bool' with actual type `[Char]' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Bool’ with actual type ‛[Char]’ In the expression: "Two" - In the first argument of `foo', namely - `[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]' + In the first argument of ‛foo’, namely + ‛[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]’ In the expression: foo [a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....] tcfail177.hs:23:20: - Couldn't match expected type `Bool' with actual type `[Char]' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Bool’ with actual type ‛[Char]’ In the expression: "Two" - In the first argument of `foo', namely - `[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]' + In the first argument of ‛foo’, namely + ‛[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]’ In the expression: foo [a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....] tcfail177.hs:23:27: - Couldn't match expected type `Bool' with actual type `[Char]' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Bool’ with actual type ‛[Char]’ In the expression: "Two" - In the first argument of `foo', namely - `[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]' + In the first argument of ‛foo’, namely + ‛[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]’ In the expression: foo [a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....] tcfail177.hs:24:13: - Couldn't match expected type `Bool' with actual type `[Char]' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Bool’ with actual type ‛[Char]’ In the expression: "Two" - In the first argument of `foo', namely - `[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]' + In the first argument of ‛foo’, namely + ‛[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]’ In the expression: foo [a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....] tcfail177.hs:24:20: - Couldn't match expected type `Bool' with actual type `[Char]' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Bool’ with actual type ‛[Char]’ In the expression: "Two" - In the first argument of `foo', namely - `[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]' + In the first argument of ‛foo’, namely + ‛[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]’ In the expression: foo [a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....] tcfail177.hs:24:27: - Couldn't match expected type `Bool' with actual type `[Char]' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Bool’ with actual type ‛[Char]’ In the expression: "Two" - In the first argument of `foo', namely - `[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]' + In the first argument of ‛foo’, namely + ‛[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]’ In the expression: foo [a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....] tcfail177.hs:25:13: - Couldn't match expected type `Bool' with actual type `[Char]' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Bool’ with actual type ‛[Char]’ In the expression: "Two" - In the first argument of `foo', namely - `[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]' + In the first argument of ‛foo’, namely + ‛[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]’ In the expression: foo [a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....] tcfail177.hs:25:20: - Couldn't match expected type `Bool' with actual type `[Char]' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Bool’ with actual type ‛[Char]’ In the expression: "Two" - In the first argument of `foo', namely - `[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]' + In the first argument of ‛foo’, namely + ‛[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]’ In the expression: foo [a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....] tcfail177.hs:25:27: - Couldn't match expected type `Bool' with actual type `[Char]' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Bool’ with actual type ‛[Char]’ In the expression: "Two" - In the first argument of `foo', namely - `[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]' + In the first argument of ‛foo’, namely + ‛[a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....]’ In the expression: foo [a ~?= b, "Three" ~?= "3", "Four" ~?= "4", "Five" ~?= "5", ....] diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail178.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail178.stderr index b0b6360df7..fe0ffa71c6 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail178.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail178.stderr @@ -1,16 +1,16 @@ tcfail178.hs:15:7: - Couldn't match type `()' with `[a]' + Couldn't match type ‛()’ with ‛[a]’ Expected type: Bool -> [a] Actual type: Bool -> () Relevant bindings include c :: [a] (bound at tcfail178.hs:15:1) - In the first argument of `a', namely `y' + In the first argument of ‛a’, namely ‛y’ In the expression: a y - In an equation for `c': c = a y + In an equation for ‛c’: c = a y tcfail178.hs:18:7: - Couldn't match expected type `Bool -> [a]' with actual type `()' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Bool -> [a]’ with actual type ‛()’ Relevant bindings include d :: [a] (bound at tcfail178.hs:18:1) - In the first argument of `a', namely `()' + In the first argument of ‛a’, namely ‛()’ In the expression: a () - In an equation for `d': d = a () + In an equation for ‛d’: d = a () diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail179.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail179.stderr index ed0325acdc..89cd804371 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail179.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail179.stderr @@ -1,18 +1,18 @@ tcfail179.hs:14:39: - Couldn't match expected type `s' with actual type `x' - `x' is a rigid type variable bound by + Couldn't match expected type ‛s’ with actual type ‛x’ + ‛x’ is a rigid type variable bound by a pattern with constructor T :: forall s x. (s -> (x -> s) -> (x, s, Int)) -> T s, in a case alternative at tcfail179.hs:14:14 - `s' is a rigid type variable bound by + ‛s’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for run :: T s -> Int at tcfail179.hs:12:8 Relevant bindings include run :: T s -> Int (bound at tcfail179.hs:13:1) ts :: T s (bound at tcfail179.hs:13:5) g :: s -> (x -> s) -> (x, s, Int) (bound at tcfail179.hs:14:16) x :: x (bound at tcfail179.hs:14:26) - In the first argument of `g', namely `x' + In the first argument of ‛g’, namely ‛x’ In the expression: g x id In a pattern binding: (x, _, b) = g x id diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail180.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail180.stderr index 96d76100ea..8baeb4ed51 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail180.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail180.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ tcfail180.hs:10:9: - Couldn't match expected type `f0 b0' with actual type `Bool' + Couldn't match expected type ‛f0 b0’ with actual type ‛Bool’ In the pattern: True In a case alternative: True -> () In the expression: case p of { True -> () } diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail181.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail181.stderr index d6e622cb30..33b75ff75e 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail181.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail181.stderr @@ -1,15 +1,15 @@ -
-tcfail181.hs:17:9:
- Could not deduce (Monad m0) arising from a use of `foo'
- from the context (Monad m)
- bound by the inferred type of
- wog :: Monad m => t -> Something (m Bool) e
- at tcfail181.hs:17:1-30
- The type variable `m0' is ambiguous
- Note: there are several potential instances:
- instance Monad ((->) r) -- Defined in `GHC.Base'
- instance Monad IO -- Defined in `GHC.Base'
- instance Monad [] -- Defined in `GHC.Base'
- In the expression: foo
- In the expression: foo {bar = return True}
- In an equation for `wog': wog x = foo {bar = return True}
+ +tcfail181.hs:17:9: + Could not deduce (Monad m0) arising from a use of ‛foo’ + from the context (Monad m) + bound by the inferred type of + wog :: Monad m => t -> Something (m Bool) e + at tcfail181.hs:17:1-30 + The type variable ‛m0’ is ambiguous + Note: there are several potential instances: + instance Monad ((->) r) -- Defined in ‛GHC.Base’ + instance Monad IO -- Defined in ‛GHC.Base’ + instance Monad [] -- Defined in ‛GHC.Base’ + In the expression: foo + In the expression: foo {bar = return True} + In an equation for ‛wog’: wog x = foo {bar = return True} diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail182.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail182.stderr index e021987234..36768f6744 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail182.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail182.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ tcfail182.hs:9:3: - Couldn't match expected type `Prelude.Maybe a' - with actual type `Maybe t0' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Prelude.Maybe a’ + with actual type ‛Maybe t0’ Relevant bindings include f :: Prelude.Maybe a -> Int (bound at tcfail182.hs:9:1) In the pattern: Foo - In an equation for `f': f Foo = 3 + In an equation for ‛f’: f Foo = 3 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail184.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail184.stderr index 20920d822b..cfb89422dc 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail184.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail184.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -
-tcfail184.hs:8:19:
- Illegal polymorphic or qualified type:
- forall a. Ord a => [a] -> [a]
- Perhaps you intended to use -XRankNTypes or -XRank2Types
- In the definition of data constructor `MkSwizzle'
- In the newtype declaration for `Swizzle'
+ +tcfail184.hs:8:19: + Illegal polymorphic or qualified type: + forall a. Ord a => [a] -> [a] + Perhaps you intended to use -XRankNTypes or -XRank2Types + In the definition of data constructor ‛MkSwizzle’ + In the newtype declaration for ‛Swizzle’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail185.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail185.stderr index 1e4c8d718f..f46211e4fa 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail185.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail185.stderr @@ -1,17 +1,17 @@ tcfail185.hs:7:46: - Couldn't match expected type `Int -> Int' with actual type `Bool' + Couldn't match expected type ‛Int -> Int’ with actual type ‛Bool’ In the expression: x In the expression: - let - y1 = y - y2 = y1 - y3 = y2 - .... - in x + let + y1 = y + y2 = y1 + y3 = y2 + .... + in x In the expression: - \ x y - -> let - y1 = ... - .... - in x + \ x y + -> let + y1 = ... + .... + in x diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail186.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail186.stderr index b22e672ae6..f9ced11d36 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail186.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail186.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ tcfail186.hs:7:9: - Couldn't match type `[Char]' with `Int' + Couldn't match type ‛[Char]’ with ‛Int’ Expected type: PhantomSyn a0 Actual type: [Char] - In the first argument of `f', namely `"hoo"' + In the first argument of ‛f’, namely ‛"hoo"’ In the expression: f "hoo" - In an equation for `foo': foo = f "hoo" + In an equation for ‛foo’: foo = f "hoo" diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail187.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail187.stderr index 07a741d025..10a9115ff5 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail187.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail187.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ tcfail187.hs:7:6: - Constructor `:::' should have no arguments, but has been given 2 + Constructor ‛:::’ should have no arguments, but has been given 2 In the pattern: x ::: y - In an equation for `foo': foo (x ::: y) = () + In an equation for ‛foo’: foo (x ::: y) = () diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail189.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail189.stderr index 6364cc2d5b..a7105907a7 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail189.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail189.stderr @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ tcfail189.hs:10:31: - Couldn't match type `[a0]' with `a -> a1' + Couldn't match type ‛[a0]’ with ‛a -> a1’ Expected type: (a -> a1) -> [a] -> [[a]] Actual type: [a0] -> [a0] - In the return type of a call of `take' - Probable cause: `take' is applied to too many arguments + In the return type of a call of ‛take’ + Probable cause: ‛take’ is applied to too many arguments In the expression: take 2 In a stmt of a list comprehension: then group by x using take 2 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail190.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail190.stderr index db2d842f58..df56a79a73 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail190.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail190.stderr @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ tcfail190.hs:14:31: - No instance for (Ord Unorderable) arising from a use of `groupWith' + No instance for (Ord Unorderable) arising from a use of ‛groupWith’ In the expression: groupWith In a stmt of a list comprehension: then group by x using groupWith In the expression: diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail191.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail191.stderr index a276a04eae..b84f6f7701 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail191.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail191.stderr @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ tcfail191.hs:11:26: - Couldn't match type `a' with `[a]' - `a' is a rigid type variable bound by + Couldn't match type ‛a’ with ‛[a]’ + ‛a’ is a rigid type variable bound by a type expected by the context: [a] -> [[a]] at tcfail191.hs:11:9 Expected type: [a] -> [[a]] Actual type: [a] -> [a] - In the return type of a call of `take' + In the return type of a call of ‛take’ In the expression: take 5 In a stmt of a list comprehension: then group using take 5 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail192.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail192.stderr index caf7ef1401..0fcced9cc3 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail192.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail192.stderr @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ tcfail192.hs:10:26: - Couldn't match type `a' with `[a]' - `a' is a rigid type variable bound by + Couldn't match type ‛a’ with ‛[a]’ + ‛a’ is a rigid type variable bound by a type expected by the context: [a] -> [[a]] at tcfail192.hs:10:9 Expected type: [a] -> [[a]] Actual type: [a] -> [a] - In the return type of a call of `take' + In the return type of a call of ‛take’ In the expression: take 5 In a stmt of a list comprehension: then group using take 5 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail193.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail193.stderr index 47375e8401..9c9e94b150 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail193.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail193.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ tcfail193.hs:10:31: - Couldn't match type `a' with `[a]' - `a' is a rigid type variable bound by + Couldn't match type ‛a’ with ‛[a]’ + ‛a’ is a rigid type variable bound by a type expected by the context: [a] -> [a] at tcfail193.hs:10:26 Expected type: [a] -> [a] Actual type: [a] -> [[a]] diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail194.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail194.stderr index 7190a884ca..9140c16427 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail194.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail194.stderr @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ tcfail194.hs:9:29: - Couldn't match type `[a0]' with `a -> t' + Couldn't match type ‛[a0]’ with ‛a -> t’ Expected type: (a -> t) -> [a] -> [a] Actual type: [a0] -> [a0] Relevant bindings include z :: [t] (bound at tcfail194.hs:9:1) - In the return type of a call of `take' - Probable cause: `take' is applied to too many arguments + In the return type of a call of ‛take’ + Probable cause: ‛take’ is applied to too many arguments In the expression: take 5 In a stmt of a list comprehension: then take 5 by x diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail195.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail195.stderr index d690ebac82..4800e75642 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail195.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail195.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -
-tcfail195.hs:6:3:
- Illegal polymorphic or qualified type: forall a. a
- In the definition of data constructor `Foo'
- In the data declaration for `Foo'
+ +tcfail195.hs:6:3: + Illegal polymorphic or qualified type: forall a. a + In the definition of data constructor ‛Foo’ + In the data declaration for ‛Foo’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail196.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail196.stderr index ea6f16fd98..ffedbdf1b9 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail196.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail196.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ tcfail196.hs:5:8: Illegal polymorphic or qualified type: forall a. a - In the type signature for `bar': + In the type signature for ‛bar’: bar :: Num (forall a. a) => Int -> Int diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail197.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail197.stderr index 464dacb078..30bf9583fa 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail197.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail197.stderr @@ -2,4 +2,4 @@ tcfail197.hs:5:8: Illegal polymorphic or qualified type: forall a. a Perhaps you intended to use -XImpredicativeTypes - In the type signature for `foo': foo :: [forall a. a] -> Int + In the type signature for ‛foo’: foo :: [forall a. a] -> Int diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail198.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail198.stderr index 22a09f59f7..a2c66aa4bf 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail198.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail198.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ tcfail198.hs:6:36: - Couldn't match expected type `a1' with actual type `a' - because type variable `a1' would escape its scope + Couldn't match expected type ‛a1’ with actual type ‛a’ + because type variable ‛a1’ would escape its scope This (rigid, skolem) type variable is bound by an expression type signature: a1 at tcfail198.hs:6:36-41 @@ -10,5 +10,5 @@ tcfail198.hs:6:36: x :: a (bound at tcfail198.hs:6:19) xs :: [a] (bound at tcfail198.hs:6:21) In the expression: x :: a - In the second argument of `(++)', namely `[x :: a]' + In the second argument of ‛(++)’, namely ‛[x :: a]’ In the expression: xs ++ [x :: a] diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail199.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail199.stderr index 6866a26452..3e1df5e806 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail199.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail199.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ tcfail199.hs:5:1: - Couldn't match expected type `IO t0' with actual type `[Char]' + Couldn't match expected type ‛IO t0’ with actual type ‛[Char]’ In the expression: main - When checking the type of the function `main' + When checking the type of the function ‛main’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail200.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail200.stderr index 731f906fdb..57c174d109 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail200.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail200.stderr @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ tcfail200.hs:5:15: - Couldn't match kind `*' with `#' + Couldn't match kind ‛*’ with ‛#’ When matching types t1 :: * GHC.Prim.Int# :: # In the expression: 1# In the expression: (1#, 'c') - In an equation for `x': x = (1#, 'c') + In an equation for ‛x’: x = (1#, 'c') diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail201.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail201.stderr index 4d93f9fadd..ada710e43b 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail201.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail201.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ tcfail201.hs:17:27: - Couldn't match expected type `a' with actual type `HsDoc t0' - `a' is a rigid type variable bound by + Couldn't match expected type ‛a’ with actual type ‛HsDoc t0’ + ‛a’ is a rigid type variable bound by the type signature for gfoldl' :: (forall a1 b. c (a1 -> b) -> a1 -> c b) -> (forall g. g -> c g) -> a -> c a diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail203.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail203.stderr index 29cf84095b..7635b68b4b 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail203.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail203.stderr @@ -1,35 +1,35 @@ -tcfail203.hs:28:11: - Warning: Pattern bindings containing unlifted types should use an outermost bang pattern: - (I# x) = 5 - In an equation for `fail2': +tcfail203.hs:28:11: Warning: + Pattern bindings containing unlifted types should use an outermost bang pattern: + (I# x) = 5 + In an equation for ‛fail2’: fail2 = 'a' where (I# x) = 5 -tcfail203.hs:31:11: - Warning: Pattern bindings containing unlifted types should use an outermost bang pattern: - (b, I# x) = (True, 5) - In an equation for `fail3': +tcfail203.hs:31:11: Warning: + Pattern bindings containing unlifted types should use an outermost bang pattern: + (b, I# x) = (True, 5) + In an equation for ‛fail3’: fail3 = 'a' where (b, I# x) = (True, 5) -tcfail203.hs:40:11: - Warning: Pattern bindings containing unlifted types should use an outermost bang pattern: - (I# !x) = 5 - In an equation for `fail6': +tcfail203.hs:40:11: Warning: + Pattern bindings containing unlifted types should use an outermost bang pattern: + (I# !x) = 5 + In an equation for ‛fail6’: fail6 = 'a' where (I# !x) = 5 -tcfail203.hs:43:11: - Warning: Pattern bindings containing unlifted types should use an outermost bang pattern: - (b, !(I# x)) = (True, 5) - In an equation for `fail7': +tcfail203.hs:43:11: Warning: + Pattern bindings containing unlifted types should use an outermost bang pattern: + (b, !(I# x)) = (True, 5) + In an equation for ‛fail7’: fail7 = 'a' where diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail204.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail204.stderr index e9d9bb739d..bfbac54432 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail204.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail204.stderr @@ -1,13 +1,13 @@ -tcfail204.hs:10:15: - Warning: Defaulting the following constraint(s) to type `Double' - (Fractional a0) arising from the literal `6.3' - at tcfail204.hs:10:15-17 - (RealFrac a0) arising from a use of `ceiling' - at tcfail204.hs:10:7-13 - In the first argument of `ceiling', namely `6.3' +tcfail204.hs:10:15: Warning: + Defaulting the following constraint(s) to type ‛Double’ + (Fractional a0) + arising from the literal ‛6.3’ at tcfail204.hs:10:15-17 + (RealFrac a0) + arising from a use of ‛ceiling’ at tcfail204.hs:10:7-13 + In the first argument of ‛ceiling’, namely ‛6.3’ In the expression: ceiling 6.3 - In an equation for `foo': foo = ceiling 6.3 + In an equation for ‛foo’: foo = ceiling 6.3 <no location info>: Failing due to -Werror. diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail206.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail206.stderr index b5b9aef830..d503b16207 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail206.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail206.stderr @@ -1,28 +1,28 @@ tcfail206.hs:5:5: - Couldn't match type `Bool' with `Int' + Couldn't match type ‛Bool’ with ‛Int’ Expected type: Bool -> (Int, Bool) Actual type: Bool -> (Bool, Bool) In the expression: (, True) - In an equation for `a': a = (, True) + In an equation for ‛a’: a = (, True) tcfail206.hs:8:5: - Couldn't match type `(t0, Int)' with `Bool -> (Int, Bool)' + Couldn't match type ‛(t0, Int)’ with ‛Bool -> (Int, Bool)’ Expected type: Int -> Bool -> (Int, Bool) Actual type: Int -> (t0, Int) In the expression: (1,) - In an equation for `b': b = (1,) + In an equation for ‛b’: b = (1,) tcfail206.hs:14:5: - Couldn't match type `Bool' with `Int' + Couldn't match type ‛Bool’ with ‛Int’ Expected type: Bool -> (# Int, Bool #) Actual type: Bool -> (# Bool, Bool #) In the expression: (# , True #) - In an equation for `d': d = (# , True #) + In an equation for ‛d’: d = (# , True #) tcfail206.hs:17:5: - Couldn't match type `(# a0, Int #)' with `Bool -> (# Int, Bool #)' + Couldn't match type ‛(# a0, Int #)’ with ‛Bool -> (# Int, Bool #)’ Expected type: Int -> Bool -> (# Int, Bool #) Actual type: Int -> (# a0, Int #) In the expression: (# 1, #) - In an equation for `e': e = (# 1, #) + In an equation for ‛e’: e = (# 1, #) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail207.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail207.stderr index 3e96a0994e..f647a324ba 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail207.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail207.stderr @@ -1,16 +1,16 @@ tcfail207.hs:5:7: - Couldn't match expected type `[Int] -> [Int]' - with actual type `[a1]' - In the return type of a call of `take' - Probable cause: `take' is applied to too many arguments + Couldn't match expected type ‛[Int] -> [Int]’ + with actual type ‛[a1]’ + In the return type of a call of ‛take’ + Probable cause: ‛take’ is applied to too many arguments In the expression: take x [] - In an equation for `f': f x = take x [] + In an equation for ‛f’: f x = take x [] tcfail207.hs:9:5: - Couldn't match expected type `[Int]' - with actual type `[a0] -> [a0]' - In the return type of a call of `take' - Probable cause: `take' is applied to too few arguments + Couldn't match expected type ‛[Int]’ + with actual type ‛[a0] -> [a0]’ + In the return type of a call of ‛take’ + Probable cause: ‛take’ is applied to too few arguments In the expression: take 3 - In an equation for `g': g = take 3 + In an equation for ‛g’: g = take 3 diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail208.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail208.stderr index d3172b6a91..7419e90c52 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail208.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail208.stderr @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ tcfail208.hs:4:19: - Could not deduce (Eq (m a)) arising from a use of `==' + Could not deduce (Eq (m a)) arising from a use of ‛==’ from the context (Monad m, Eq a) bound by the type signature for f :: (Monad m, Eq a) => a -> m a -> Bool at tcfail208.hs:3:6-40 In the expression: (return x == y) - In an equation for `f': f x y = (return x == y) + In an equation for ‛f’: f x y = (return x == y) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail209.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail209.stderr index d0a59e9701..65bc8de455 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail209.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail209.stderr @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -
-tcfail209.hs:3:1:
- Illegal constraint synonym of kind: `* -> Constraint'
- (Use -XConstraintKinds to permit this)
- In the type declaration for `Showish'
+ +tcfail209.hs:3:1: + Illegal constraint synonym of kind: ‛* -> Constraint’ + (Use -XConstraintKinds to permit this) + In the type declaration for ‛Showish’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail209a.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail209a.stderr index 1b56c86728..9acacaaacf 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail209a.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail209a.stderr @@ -2,5 +2,5 @@ tcfail209a.hs:3:6: Illegal tuple constraint: (Show a, Num a) (Use -XConstraintKinds to permit this) - In the type signature for `g': + In the type signature for ‛g’: g :: ((Show a, Num a), Eq a) => a -> a diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail210.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail210.stderr index 95aba8e61b..9b998d425e 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail210.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail210.stderr @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ tcfail210.hs:4:31: - Not in scope: type constructor or class `Constraint' + Not in scope: type constructor or class ‛Constraint’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail211.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail211.stderr index 81e04d670d..491349b123 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail211.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail211.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@ tcfail211.hs:16:13: - Unbound implicit parameter (?imp::Int) - arising from a use of `test' - In the first argument of `print', namely `test' + Unbound implicit parameter (?imp::Int) arising from a use of ‛test’ + In the first argument of ‛print’, namely ‛test’ In the expression: print test - In an equation for `use': use = print test + In an equation for ‛use’: use = print test diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail212.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail212.stderr index a94496181b..b116fd1d95 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail212.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail212.stderr @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ tcfail212.hs:10:7: - Expecting one more argument to `Maybe' - The first argument of a tuple should have kind `*', - but `Maybe' has kind `* -> *' - In the type signature for `f': f :: (Maybe, Either Int) + Expecting one more argument to ‛Maybe’ + The first argument of a tuple should have kind ‛*’, + but ‛Maybe’ has kind ‛* -> *’ + In the type signature for ‛f’: f :: (Maybe, Either Int) tcfail212.hs:13:7: - Expecting a lifted type, but `Int#' is unlifted - In the type signature for `g': g :: (Int#, Int#) + Expecting a lifted type, but ‛Int#’ is unlifted + In the type signature for ‛g’: g :: (Int#, Int#) diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail213.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail213.stderr index 9208711389..bef0507b8b 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail213.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail213.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -
-tcfail213.hs:8:1:
- Illegal constraint `F a' in a superclass/instance context
- (Use -XUndecidableInstances to permit this)
- In the context: (F a)
- While checking the super-classes of class `C'
- In the class declaration for `C'
+ +tcfail213.hs:8:1: + Illegal constraint ‛F a’ in a superclass/instance context + (Use -XUndecidableInstances to permit this) + In the context: (F a) + While checking the super-classes of class ‛C’ + In the class declaration for ‛C’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail214.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail214.stderr index d8df299f56..983d4b39a1 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail214.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail214.stderr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -
-tcfail214.hs:9:10:
- Illegal constraint `F a' in a superclass/instance context
- (Use -XUndecidableInstances to permit this)
- In the context: (F a)
- While checking an instance declaration
- In the instance declaration for `C [a]'
+ +tcfail214.hs:9:10: + Illegal constraint ‛F a’ in a superclass/instance context + (Use -XUndecidableInstances to permit this) + In the context: (F a) + While checking an instance declaration + In the instance declaration for ‛C [a]’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail215.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail215.stderr index 75c894eda6..a9fe4da24e 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail215.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail215.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ tcfail215.hs:8:15: - Expecting a lifted type, but `Int#' is unlifted - In the type signature for `foo': foo :: ?x :: Int# => Int + Expecting a lifted type, but ‛Int#’ is unlifted + In the type signature for ‛foo’: foo :: ?x :: Int# => Int diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail216.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail216.stderr index bcb07b8f15..11b077e7e1 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail216.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail216.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ tcfail216.hs:5:1: Cycle in class declaration (via superclasses): A -> A - In the class declaration for `A' + In the class declaration for ‛A’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail217.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail217.stderr index 79f3b0e0a9..64584169e9 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail217.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_fail/tcfail217.stderr @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ tcfail217.hs:7:1: Cycle in class declaration (via superclasses): A -> Aish -> A - In the class declaration for `A' + In the class declaration for ‛A’ diff --git a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_run/tcrun035.stderr b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_run/tcrun035.stderr index f0fc2d53b7..9c7a3c7488 100644 --- a/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_run/tcrun035.stderr +++ b/testsuite/tests/typecheck/should_run/tcrun035.stderr @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ -
-tcrun035.hs:13:7:
- Couldn't match type `IO a'
- with `forall (m :: * -> *). Monad m => m a'
- Expected type: (forall (m :: * -> *). Monad m => m a) -> IO a
- Actual type: IO a -> IO a
- Relevant bindings include
- foo :: (forall (m :: * -> *). Monad m => m a) -> IO a
- (bound at tcrun035.hs:13:1)
- In the expression: id . id
- In an equation for `foo': foo = id . id
+ +tcrun035.hs:13:7: + Couldn't match type ‛IO a’ + with ‛forall (m :: * -> *). Monad m => m a’ + Expected type: (forall (m :: * -> *). Monad m => m a) -> IO a + Actual type: IO a -> IO a + Relevant bindings include + foo :: (forall (m :: * -> *). Monad m => m a) -> IO a + (bound at tcrun035.hs:13:1) + In the expression: id . id + In an equation for ‛foo’: foo = id . id |