diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'compiler/deSugar/DsUtils.hs')
-rw-r--r-- | compiler/deSugar/DsUtils.hs | 142 |
1 files changed, 74 insertions, 68 deletions
diff --git a/compiler/deSugar/DsUtils.hs b/compiler/deSugar/DsUtils.hs index 8559e9ae85..b76c4f0592 100644 --- a/compiler/deSugar/DsUtils.hs +++ b/compiler/deSugar/DsUtils.hs @@ -408,82 +408,88 @@ mkErrorAppDs err_id ty msg = do return (mkApps (Var err_id) [Type (getRuntimeRep ty), Type ty, core_msg]) {- -'mkCoreAppDs' and 'mkCoreAppsDs' hand the special-case desugaring of 'seq'. - -Note [Desugaring seq (1)] cf #1031 -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - f x y = x `seq` (y `seq` (# x,y #)) - -The [CoreSyn let/app invariant] means that, other things being equal, because -the argument to the outer 'seq' has an unlifted type, we'll use call-by-value thus: - - f x y = case (y `seq` (# x,y #)) of v -> x `seq` v - -But that is bad for two reasons: - (a) we now evaluate y before x, and - (b) we can't bind v to an unboxed pair - -Seq is very, very special! So we recognise it right here, and desugar to - case x of _ -> case y of _ -> (# x,y #) - -Note [Desugaring seq (2)] cf #2273 -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -Consider - let chp = case b of { True -> fst x; False -> 0 } - in chp `seq` ...chp... -Here the seq is designed to plug the space leak of retaining (snd x) -for too long. - -If we rely on the ordinary inlining of seq, we'll get - let chp = case b of { True -> fst x; False -> 0 } - case chp of _ { I# -> ...chp... } - -But since chp is cheap, and the case is an alluring contet, we'll -inline chp into the case scrutinee. Now there is only one use of chp, -so we'll inline a second copy. Alas, we've now ruined the purpose of -the seq, by re-introducing the space leak: - case (case b of {True -> fst x; False -> 0}) of - I# _ -> ...case b of {True -> fst x; False -> 0}... - -We can try to avoid doing this by ensuring that the binder-swap in the -case happens, so we get his at an early stage: - case chp of chp2 { I# -> ...chp2... } -But this is fragile. The real culprit is the source program. Perhaps we -should have said explicitly - let !chp2 = chp in ...chp2... - -But that's painful. So the code here does a little hack to make seq -more robust: a saturated application of 'seq' is turned *directly* into -the case expression, thus: - x `seq` e2 ==> case x of x -> e2 -- Note shadowing! - e1 `seq` e2 ==> case x of _ -> e2 - -So we desugar our example to: - let chp = case b of { True -> fst x; False -> 0 } - case chp of chp { I# -> ...chp... } -And now all is well. - -The reason it's a hack is because if you define mySeq=seq, the hack -won't work on mySeq. - -Note [Desugaring seq (3)] cf #2409 -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -The isLocalId ensures that we don't turn - True `seq` e -into - case True of True { ... } -which stupidly tries to bind the datacon 'True'. +'mkCoreAppDs' and 'mkCoreAppsDs' handle the special-case desugaring of 'seq'. + +Note [Desugaring seq] +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +There are a few subtleties in the desugaring of `seq`: + + 1. (as described in #1031) + + Consider, + f x y = x `seq` (y `seq` (# x,y #)) + + The [CoreSyn let/app invariant] means that, other things being equal, because + the argument to the outer 'seq' has an unlifted type, we'll use call-by-value thus: + + f x y = case (y `seq` (# x,y #)) of v -> x `seq` v + + But that is bad for two reasons: + (a) we now evaluate y before x, and + (b) we can't bind v to an unboxed pair + + Seq is very, very special! So we recognise it right here, and desugar to + case x of _ -> case y of _ -> (# x,y #) + + 2. (as described in #2273) + + Consider + let chp = case b of { True -> fst x; False -> 0 } + in chp `seq` ...chp... + Here the seq is designed to plug the space leak of retaining (snd x) + for too long. + + If we rely on the ordinary inlining of seq, we'll get + let chp = case b of { True -> fst x; False -> 0 } + case chp of _ { I# -> ...chp... } + + But since chp is cheap, and the case is an alluring contet, we'll + inline chp into the case scrutinee. Now there is only one use of chp, + so we'll inline a second copy. Alas, we've now ruined the purpose of + the seq, by re-introducing the space leak: + case (case b of {True -> fst x; False -> 0}) of + I# _ -> ...case b of {True -> fst x; False -> 0}... + + We can try to avoid doing this by ensuring that the binder-swap in the + case happens, so we get his at an early stage: + case chp of chp2 { I# -> ...chp2... } + But this is fragile. The real culprit is the source program. Perhaps we + should have said explicitly + let !chp2 = chp in ...chp2... + + But that's painful. So the code here does a little hack to make seq + more robust: a saturated application of 'seq' is turned *directly* into + the case expression, thus: + x `seq` e2 ==> case x of x -> e2 -- Note shadowing! + e1 `seq` e2 ==> case x of _ -> e2 + + So we desugar our example to: + let chp = case b of { True -> fst x; False -> 0 } + case chp of chp { I# -> ...chp... } + And now all is well. + + The reason it's a hack is because if you define mySeq=seq, the hack + won't work on mySeq. + + 3. (as described in #2409) + + The isLocalId ensures that we don't turn + True `seq` e + into + case True of True { ... } + which stupidly tries to bind the datacon 'True'. -} -- NB: Make sure the argument is not levity polymorphic mkCoreAppDs :: SDoc -> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr -> CoreExpr -mkCoreAppDs _ (Var f `App` Type ty1 `App` Type ty2 `App` arg1) arg2 - | f `hasKey` seqIdKey -- Note [Desugaring seq (1), (2)] +mkCoreAppDs _ (Var f `App` Type _r `App` Type ty1 `App` Type ty2 `App` arg1) arg2 + | f `hasKey` seqIdKey -- Note [Desugaring seq], points (1) and (2) = Case arg1 case_bndr ty2 [(DEFAULT,[],arg2)] where case_bndr = case arg1 of Var v1 | isInternalName (idName v1) - -> v1 -- Note [Desugaring seq (2) and (3)] + -> v1 -- Note [Desugaring seq], points (2) and (3) _ -> mkWildValBinder ty1 mkCoreAppDs s fun arg = mkCoreApp s fun arg -- The rest is done in MkCore |