1 files changed, 0 insertions, 48 deletions
diff --git a/rts/gmp/mpn/sparc64/README b/rts/gmp/mpn/sparc64/README
deleted file mode 100644
index 6923a133f3..0000000000
--- a/rts/gmp/mpn/sparc64/README
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,48 +0,0 @@
-This directory contains mpn functions for 64-bit V9 SPARC
-
-RELEVANT OPTIMIZATION ISSUES
-
-The Ultra I/II pipeline executes up to two simple integer arithmetic operations
-per cycle.  The 64-bit integer multiply instruction mulx takes from 5 cycles to
-35 cycles, depending on the position of the most significant bit of the 1st
-source operand.  It cannot overlap with other instructions.  For our use of
-mulx, it will take from 5 to 20 cycles.
-
-Integer conditional move instructions cannot dual-issue with other integer
-instructions.  No conditional move can issue 1-5 cycles after a load.  (Or
-something such bizzare.)
-
-Integer branches can issue with two integer arithmetic instructions.  Likewise
-for integer loads.  Four instructions may issue (arith, arith, ld/st, branch)
-but only if the branch is last.
-
-(The V9 architecture manual recommends that the 2nd operand of a multiply
-instruction be the smaller one.  For UltraSPARC, they got things backwards and
-optimize for the wrong operand!  Really helpful in the light of that multiply
-is incredibly slow on these CPUs!)
-
-STATUS
-
-There is new code in ~/prec/gmp-remote/sparc64.  Not tested or completed, but
-the pipelines are worked out.  Here are the timings:
-
-* lshift, rshift: The code is well-optimized and runs at 2.0 cycles/limb.
-
-* add_n, sub_n: add3.s currently runs at 6 cycles/limb.  We use a bizarre
-  scheme of compares and branches (with some nops and fnops to align things)
-  and carefully stay away from the instructions intended for this application
-  (i.e., movcs and movcc).
-
-  Using movcc/movcs, even with deep unrolling, seems to get down to 7
-  cycles/limb.
-
-  The most promising approach is to split operands in 32-bit pieces using
-  srlx, then use two addccc, and finally compile the results with sllx+or.
-  The result could run at 5 cycles/limb, I think.  It might be possible to
-  do without unrolling, or with minimal unrolling.
-
-* addmul_1/submul_1: Should optimize for when scalar operand < 2^32.
-* addmul_1/submul_1: Since mulx is horrendously slow on UltraSPARC I/II,
-  Karatsuba's method should save up to 16 cycles (i.e. > 20%).
-* mul_1 (and possibly the other multiply functions): Handle carry in the
-  same tricky way as add_n,sub_n.