| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* No more need for InlineHdkM, mkHdkM
* unHdkM is now just a record selector
* Update comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The ghc-exactPrint library has had to re-introduce the relatavise
phase.
This is needed if you change the length of an identifier and want the
layout to be preserved afterwards.
It is not possible to relatavise a bare SrcSpan, so introduce `SrcAnn
NoEpAnns` for them instead.
Updates haddock submodule.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This allows us to use an Anchor with a DeltaPos in it when exact
printing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Another step towards a simpler design for exact printing.
Updates the haddock submodule.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit converts the lexers and all the parser machinery to use the
new parser types and diagnostics infrastructure. Furthermore, it cleans
up the way the parser code was emitting hints.
As a result of this systematic approach, the test output of the
`InfixAppPatErr` and `T984` tests have been changed. Previously they
would emit a `SuggestMissingDo` hint, but this was not at all helpful in
resolving the error, and it was even confusing by just looking at the
original program that triggered the errors.
Update haddock submodule
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch fixes a space leak related to the use of
Maybe in RealSrcSpan by introducing a strict variant
of Maybe.
In addition to that, it also introduces a strict pair
and uses the newly introduced strict data types in a few
other places (e.g. the lexer/parser state) to reduce
allocations.
Includes a regression test.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Updates haddock submodule
Closes #19845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Metric Increase:
T10370
parsing001
Updates haddock submodule
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If the context is missing it is captured as Nothing, rather than
putting a noLoc in the ParsedSource.
Updates haddock submodule
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit renames parser's Error and Warning types (and their
constructors) to have a 'Ps' prefix, so that this would play nicely
when more errors and warnings for other phases of the pipeline will
be added. This will make more explicit which is the particular type
of error and warning we are dealing with, and will be more informative
for users to see in the generated Haddock.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The haddock submodule is also updated so that it understands the changes
to patterns.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This refactors the GHC AST to remove `HsImplicitBndrs` and replace it with
`HsOuterTyVarBndrs`, a type which records whether the outermost quantification
in a type is explicit (i.e., with an outermost, invisible `forall`) or
implicit. As a result of this refactoring, it is now evident in the AST where
the `forall`-or-nothing rule applies: it's all the places that use
`HsOuterTyVarBndrs`. See the revamped `Note [forall-or-nothing rule]` in
`GHC.Hs.Type` (previously in `GHC.Rename.HsType`).
Moreover, the places where `ScopedTypeVariables` brings lexically scoped type
variables into scope are a subset of the places that adhere to the
`forall`-or-nothing rule, so this also makes places that interact with
`ScopedTypeVariables` easier to find. See the revamped
`Note [Lexically scoped type variables]` in `GHC.Hs.Type` (previously in
`GHC.Tc.Gen.Sig`).
`HsOuterTyVarBndrs` are used in type signatures (see `HsOuterSigTyVarBndrs`)
and type family equations (see `HsOuterFamEqnTyVarBndrs`). The main difference
between the former and the latter is that the former cares about specificity
but the latter does not.
There are a number of knock-on consequences:
* There is now a dedicated `HsSigType` type, which is the combination of
`HsOuterSigTyVarBndrs` and `HsType`. `LHsSigType` is now an alias for an
`XRec` of `HsSigType`.
* Working out the details led us to a substantial refactoring of
the handling of explicit (user-written) and implicit type-variable
bindings in `GHC.Tc.Gen.HsType`.
Instead of a confusing family of higher order functions, we now
have a local data type, `SkolemInfo`, that controls how these
binders are kind-checked.
It remains very fiddly, not fully satisfying. But it's better
than it was.
Fixes #16762. Bumps the Haddock submodule.
Co-authored-by: Simon Peyton Jones <simonpj@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Richard Eisenberg <rae@richarde.dev>
Co-authored-by: Zubin Duggal <zubin@cmi.ac.in>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Haskell98 and GADT constructors both use `HsConDeclDetails`, which includes
`InfixCon`. But `InfixCon` is never used for GADT constructors, which results
in an awkward unrepresentable state. This removes the unrepresentable state by:
* Renaming the existing `HsConDeclDetails` synonym to `HsConDeclH98Details`,
which emphasizes the fact that it is now only used for Haskell98-style data
constructors, and
* Creating a new `HsConDeclGADTDetails` data type with `PrefixConGADT` and
`RecConGADT` constructors that closely resemble `PrefixCon` and `InfixCon`
in `HsConDeclH98Details`. The key difference is that `HsConDeclGADTDetails`
lacks any way to represent infix constructors.
The rest of the patch is refactoring to accommodate the new structure of
`HsConDecl{H98,GADT}Details`. Some highlights:
* The `getConArgs` and `hsConDeclArgTys` functions have been removed, as
there is no way to implement these functions uniformly for all
`ConDecl`s. For the most part, their previous call sites now
pattern match on the `ConDecl`s directly and do different things for
`ConDeclH98`s and `ConDeclGADT`s.
I did introduce one new function to make the transition easier:
`getRecConArgs_maybe`, which extracts the arguments from a `RecCon(GADT)`.
This is still possible since `RecCon(GADT)`s still use the same representation
in both `HsConDeclH98Details` and `HsConDeclGADTDetails`, and since the
pattern that `getRecConArgs_maybe` implements is used in several places,
I thought it worthwhile to factor it out into its own function.
* Previously, the `con_args` fields in `ConDeclH98` and `ConDeclGADT` were
both of type `HsConDeclDetails`. Now, the former is of type
`HsConDeclH98Details`, and the latter is of type `HsConDeclGADTDetails`,
which are distinct types. As a result, I had to rename the `con_args` field
in `ConDeclGADT` to `con_g_args` to make it typecheck.
A consequence of all this is that the `con_args` field is now partial, so
using `con_args` as a top-level field selector is dangerous. (Indeed, Haddock
was using `con_args` at the top-level, which caused it to crash at runtime
before I noticed what was wrong!) I decided to add a disclaimer in the 9.2.1
release notes to advertise this pitfall.
Fixes #18844. Bumps the `haddock` submodule.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The linear arrow can be parsed as `%1 ->` or a direct single token unicode
equivalent.
Make sure that this distinction is captured in the parsed AST by using
IsUnicodeSyntax where it appears, and introduce a new API Annotation,
AnnMult to represent its location when unicode is not used.
Updated haddock submodule
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Haskell and Cmm parsers/lexers now report errors and warnings using ADTs
defined in GHC.Parser.Errors. They can be printed using functions in
GHC.Parser.Errors.Ppr.
Some of the errors provide hints with a separate ADT (e.g. to suggest to
turn on some extension). For now, however, hints are not consistent
across all messages. For example some errors contain the hints in the
main message. I didn't want to change any message with this patch. I
expect these changes to be discussed and implemented later.
Surprisingly, this patch enhances performance. On CI
(x86_64/deb9/hadrian, ghc/alloc):
parsing001 -11.5%
T13719 -2.7%
MultiLayerModules -3.5%
Naperian -3.1%
Bump haddock submodule
Metric Decrease:
MultiLayerModules
Naperian
T13719
parsing001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This switches `deriv_clause_tys` so that instead of using a list of
`LHsSigType`s to represent the types in a `deriving` clause, it now
uses a sum type. `DctSingle` represents a `deriving` clause with no
enclosing parentheses, while `DctMulti` represents a clause with
enclosing parentheses. This makes pretty-printing easier and avoids
confusion between `HsParTy` and the enclosing parentheses in
`deriving` clauses, which are different semantically.
Fixes #18662.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- put panic related functions into GHC.Utils.Panic
- put trace related functions using DynFlags in GHC.Driver.Ppr
One step closer making Outputable fully independent of DynFlags.
Bump haddock submodule
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This removes the `ConDeclGADTPrefixPs` per the discussion in #18517.
Most of this patch simply removes code, although the code in the
`rnConDecl` case for `ConDeclGADTPrefixPs` had to be moved around a
bit:
* The nested `forall`s check now lives in the `rnConDecl` case for
`ConDeclGADT`.
* The `LinearTypes`-specific code that used to live in the
`rnConDecl` case for `ConDeclGADTPrefixPs` now lives in
`GHC.Parser.PostProcess.mkGadtDecl`, which is now monadic so that
it can check if `-XLinearTypes` is enabled.
Fixes #18157.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change `Located X` usage to `XRec pass X`
This increases the scope of the LPat experiment to almost all of GHC.
Introduce UnXRec and MapXRec classes
Fixes #17587 and #18408
Updates haddock submodule
Co-authored-by: Philipp Krüger <philipp.krueger1@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Haddock comments are, first and foremost, comments. It's very annoying
to incorporate them into the grammar. We can take advantage of an
important property: adding a Haddock comment does not change the parse
tree in any way other than wrapping some nodes in HsDocTy and the like
(and if it does, that's a bug).
This patch implements the following:
* Accumulate Haddock comments with their locations in the P monad.
This is handled in the lexer.
* After parsing, do a pass over the AST to associate Haddock comments
with AST nodes using location info.
* Report the leftover comments to the user as a warning (-Winvalid-haddock).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Issue #18191 revealed that the types of GADT constructors don't quite
adhere to the `forall`-or-nothing rule. This patch serves to clean up
this sad state of affairs somewhat. The main change is not in the
code itself, but in the documentation, as this patch introduces two
sections to the GHC User's Guide:
* A "Formal syntax for GADTs" section that presents a BNF-style
grammar for what is and isn't allowed in GADT constructor types.
This mostly exists to codify GHC's existing behavior, but it also
imposes a new restriction that addresses #18191: the outermost
`forall` and/or context in a GADT constructor is not allowed to be
surrounded by parentheses. Doing so would make these
`forall`s/contexts nested, and GADTs do not support nested
`forall`s/contexts at present.
* A "`forall`-or-nothing rule" section that describes exactly what
the `forall`-or-nothing rule is all about. Surprisingly, there was
no mention of this anywhere in the User's Guide up until now!
To adhere the new specification in the "Formal syntax for GADTs"
section of the User's Guide, the following code changes were made:
* A new function, `GHC.Hs.Type.splitLHsGADTPrefixTy`, was introduced.
This is very much like `splitLHsSigmaTy`, except that it avoids
splitting apart any parentheses, which can be syntactically
significant for GADT types. See
`Note [No nested foralls or contexts in GADT constructors]` in
`GHC.Hs.Type`.
* `ConDeclGADTPrefixPs`, an extension constructor for `XConDecl`, was
introduced so that `GHC.Parser.PostProcess.mkGadtDecl` can return
it when given a prefix GADT constructor. Unlike `ConDeclGADT`,
`ConDeclGADTPrefixPs` does not split the GADT type into its argument
and result types, as this cannot be done until after the type is
renamed (see `Note [GADT abstract syntax]` in `GHC.Hs.Decls` for why
this is the case).
* `GHC.Renamer.Module.rnConDecl` now has an additional case for
`ConDeclGADTPrefixPs` that (1) splits apart the full `LHsType` into
its `forall`s, context, argument types, and result type, and
(2) checks for nested `forall`s/contexts. Step (2) used to be
performed the typechecker (in `GHC.Tc.TyCl.badDataConTyCon`) rather
than the renamer, but now the relevant code from the typechecker
can simply be deleted.
One nice side effect of this change is that we are able to give a
more accurate error message for GADT constructors that use visible
dependent quantification (e.g., `MkFoo :: forall a -> a -> Foo a`),
which improves the stderr in the `T16326_Fail6` test case.
Fixes #18191. Bumps the Haddock submodule.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Update Haddock submodule
Metric Increase:
haddock.compiler
|
|
* SysTools
* Parser
* GHC.Builtin
* GHC.Iface.Recomp
* Settings
Update Haddock submodule
Metric Decrease:
Naperian
parsing001
|