summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/compiler/main/Constants.hs
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Allow packing constructor fieldsMichal Terepeta2017-10-291-0/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This is another step for fixing #13825 and is based on D38 by Simon Marlow. The change allows storing multiple constructor fields within the same word. This currently applies only to `Float`s, e.g., ``` data Foo = Foo {-# UNPACK #-} !Float {-# UNPACK #-} !Float ``` on 64-bit arch, will now store both fields within the same constructor word. For `WordX/IntX` we'll need to introduce new primop types. Main changes: - We now use sizes in bytes when we compute the offsets for constructor fields in `StgCmmLayout` and introduce padding if necessary (word-sized fields are still word-aligned) - `ByteCodeGen` had to be updated to correctly construct the data types. This required some new bytecode instructions to allow pushing things that are not full words onto the stack (and updating `Interpreter.c`). Note that we only use the packed stuff when constructing data types (i.e., for `PACK`), in all other cases the behavior should not change. - `RtClosureInspect` was changed to handle the new layout when extracting subterms. This seems to be used by things like `:print`. I've also added a test for this. - I deviated slightly from Simon's approach and use `PrimRep` instead of `ArgRep` for computing the size of fields. This seemed more natural and in the future we'll probably want to introduce new primitive types (e.g., `Int8#`) and `PrimRep` seems like a better place to do that (where we already have `Int64Rep` for example). `ArgRep` on the other hand seems to be more focused on calling functions. Signed-off-by: Michal Terepeta <michal.terepeta@gmail.com> Test Plan: ./validate Reviewers: bgamari, simonmar, austin, hvr, goldfire, erikd Reviewed By: bgamari Subscribers: maoe, rwbarton, thomie GHC Trac Issues: #13825 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D3809
* compiler: introduce custom "GhcPrelude" PreludeHerbert Valerio Riedel2017-09-191-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This switches the compiler/ component to get compiled with -XNoImplicitPrelude and a `import GhcPrelude` is inserted in all modules. This is motivated by the upcoming "Prelude" re-export of `Semigroup((<>))` which would cause lots of name clashes in every modulewhich imports also `Outputable` Reviewers: austin, goldfire, bgamari, alanz, simonmar Reviewed By: bgamari Subscribers: goldfire, rwbarton, thomie, mpickering, bgamari Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D3989
* Implement unboxed sum primitive typeÖmer Sinan Ağacan2016-07-211-0/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: This patch implements primitive unboxed sum types, as described in https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/UnpackedSumTypes. Main changes are: - Add new syntax for unboxed sums types, terms and patterns. Hidden behind `-XUnboxedSums`. - Add unlifted unboxed sum type constructors and data constructors, extend type and pattern checkers and desugarer. - Add new RuntimeRep for unboxed sums. - Extend unarise pass to translate unboxed sums to unboxed tuples right before code generation. - Add `StgRubbishArg` to `StgArg`, and a new type `CmmArg` for better code generation when sum values are involved. - Add user manual section for unboxed sums. Some other changes: - Generalize `UbxTupleRep` to `MultiRep` and `UbxTupAlt` to `MultiValAlt` to be able to use those with both sums and tuples. - Don't use `tyConPrimRep` in `isVoidTy`: `tyConPrimRep` is really wrong, given an `Any` `TyCon`, there's no way to tell what its kind is, but `kindPrimRep` and in turn `tyConPrimRep` returns `PtrRep`. - Fix some bugs on the way: #12375. Not included in this patch: - Update Haddock for new the new unboxed sum syntax. - `TemplateHaskell` support is left as future work. For reviewers: - Front-end code is mostly trivial and adapted from unboxed tuple code for type checking, pattern checking, renaming, desugaring etc. - Main translation routines are in `RepType` and `UnariseStg`. Documentation in `UnariseStg` should be enough for understanding what's going on. Credits: - Johan Tibell wrote the initial front-end and interface file extensions. - Simon Peyton Jones reviewed this patch many times, wrote some code, and helped with debugging. Reviewers: bgamari, alanz, goldfire, RyanGlScott, simonpj, austin, simonmar, hvr, erikd Reviewed By: simonpj Subscribers: Iceland_jack, ggreif, ezyang, RyanGlScott, goldfire, thomie, mpickering Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D2259
* Increase constraint tuple limit to 62 (Trac #10451)Nick Terrell2015-06-141-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | * Increase max constraint tuple size to 62 * Modify test case to reflect change Reviewed By: austin Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D986 GHC Trac Issues: #10451
* Another major improvement of "improvement"Simon Peyton Jones2015-06-111-0/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | I wasn't very happy with my fix to Trac #10009. This is much better. The main idea is that the inert set now contains a "model", which embodies *all* the (nominal) equalities that we know about, with a view to exposing unifications. This requires a lot fewer iterations of the solver than before. There are extensive comments in TcSMonad: Note [inert_model: the inert model] Note [Adding an inert canonical constraint the InertCans] The big changes are * New inert_model field in InertCans * Functions addInertEq, addInertCan deal with adding a constraint, maintaining the model * A nice improvement is that unification variables can unify with fmvs, so that from, say alpha ~ fmv we get alpha := fmv See Note [Orientation of equalities with fmvs] in TcFlatten It's still not perfect, as the Note explains New flag -fconstraint-solver-iterations=n, allows us to control the number of constraint solver iterations, and in particular will flag up when it's more than a small number. Performance is generally slightly better: T5837 is a lot better for some reason.
* Improve constraint tuples (Trac #10451)Simon Peyton Jones2015-06-021-1/+1
| | | | | | * Increase max constraint tuple size to 16 * Produce a civilised error message if the max size is exceeded
* Refactor tuple constraintsSimon Peyton Jones2015-05-181-0/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Make tuple constraints be handled by a perfectly ordinary type class, with the component constraints being the superclasses: class (c1, c2) => (c2, c2) This change was provoked by #10359 inability to re-use a given tuple constraint as a whole #9858 confusion between term tuples and constraint tuples but it's generally a very nice simplification. We get rid of - In Type, the TuplePred constructor of PredTree, and all the code that dealt with TuplePreds - In TcEvidence, the constructors EvTupleMk, EvTupleSel See Note [How tuples work] in TysWiredIn. Of course, nothing is ever entirely simple. This one proved quite fiddly. - I did quite a bit of renaming, which makes this patch touch a lot of modules. In partiuclar tupleCon -> tupleDataCon. - I made constraint tuples known-key rather than wired-in. This is different to boxed/unboxed tuples, but it proved awkward to have all the superclass selectors wired-in. Easier just to use the standard mechanims. - While I was fiddling with known-key names, I split the TH Name definitions out of DsMeta into a new module THNames. That meant that the known-key names can all be gathered in PrelInfo, without causing module loops. - I found that the parser was parsing an import item like T( .. ) as a *data constructor* T, and then using setRdrNameSpace to fix it. Stupid! So I changed the parser to parse a *type constructor* T, which means less use of setRdrNameSpace. I also improved setRdrNameSpace to behave better on Exact Names. Largely on priciple; I don't think it matters a lot. - When compiling a data type declaration for a wired-in thing like tuples (,), or lists, we don't really need to look at the declaration. We have the wired-in thing! And not doing so avoids having to line up the uniques for data constructor workers etc. See Note [Declarations for wired-in things] - I found that FunDeps.oclose wasn't taking superclasses into account; easily fixed. - Some error message refactoring for invalid constraints in TcValidity - Haddock needs to absorb the change too; so there is a submodule update
* Revert multiple commitsAustin Seipp2015-05-141-3/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This reverts multiple commits from Simon: - 04a484eafc9eb9f8774b4bdd41a5dc6c9f640daf Test Trac #10359 - a9ccd37add8315e061c02e5bf26c08f05fad9ac9 Test Trac #10403 - c0aae6f699cbd222d826d0b8d78d6cb3f682079e Test Trac #10248 - eb6ca851f553262efe0824b8dcbe64952de4963d Make the "matchable-given" check happen first - ca173aa30467a0b1023682d573fcd94244d85c50 Add a case to checkValidTyCon - 51cbad15f86fca1d1b0e777199eb1079a1b64d74 Update haddock submodule - 6e1174da5b8e0b296f5bfc8b39904300d04eb5b7 Separate transCloVarSet from fixVarSet - a8493e03b89f3b3bfcdb6005795de050501f5c29 Fix imports in HscMain (stage2) - a154944bf07b2e13175519bafebd5a03926bf105 Two wibbles to fix the build - 5910a1bc8142b4e56a19abea104263d7bb5c5d3f Change in capitalisation of error msg - 130e93aab220bdf14d08028771f83df210da340b Refactor tuple constraints - 8da785d59f5989b9a9df06386d5bd13f65435bc0 Delete commented-out line These break the build by causing Haddock to fail mysteriously when trying to examine GHC.Prim it seems.
* Refactor tuple constraintsSimon Peyton Jones2015-05-131-0/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Make tuple constraints be handled by a perfectly ordinary type class, with the component constraints being the superclasses: class (c1, c2) => (c2, c2) This change was provoked by #10359 inability to re-use a given tuple constraint as a whole #9858 confusion between term tuples and constraint tuples but it's generally a very nice simplification. We get rid of - In Type, the TuplePred constructor of PredTree, and all the code that dealt with TuplePreds - In TcEvidence, the constructors EvTupleMk, EvTupleSel See Note [How tuples work] in TysWiredIn. Of course, nothing is ever entirely simple. This one proved quite fiddly. - I did quite a bit of renaming, which makes this patch touch a lot of modules. In partiuclar tupleCon -> tupleDataCon. - I made constraint tuples known-key rather than wired-in. This is different to boxed/unboxed tuples, but it proved awkward to have all the superclass selectors wired-in. Easier just to use the standard mechanims. - While I was fiddling with known-key names, I split the TH Name definitions out of DsMeta into a new module THNames. That meant that the known-key names can all be gathered in PrelInfo, without causing module loops. - I found that the parser was parsing an import item like T( .. ) as a *data constructor* T, and then using setRdrNameSpace to fix it. Stupid! So I changed the parser to parse a *type constructor* T, which means less use of setRdrNameSpace. I also improved setRdrNameSpace to behave better on Exact Names. Largely on priciple; I don't think it matters a lot. - When compiling a data type declaration for a wired-in thing like tuples (,), or lists, we don't really need to look at the declaration. We have the wired-in thing! And not doing so avoids having to line up the uniques for data constructor workers etc. See Note [Declarations for wired-in things] - I found that FunDeps.oclose wasn't taking superclasses into account; easily fixed. - Some error message refactoring for invalid constraints in TcValidity
* Do proper depth checking in the flattener to avoid looping.Richard Eisenberg2015-03-231-7/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This implements (roughly) the plan put forward in comment:14:ticket:7788, fixing #7788, #8550, #9554, #10139, and addressing concerns raised in #10079. There are some regressions w.r.t. GHC 7.8, but only with pathological type families (like F a = F a). This also (hopefully -- don't have a test case) fixes #10158. Unsolved problems include #10184 and #10185, which are both known deficiencies of the approach used here. As part of this change, the plumbing around detecting infinite loops has changed. Instead of -fcontext-stack and -ftype-function-depth, we now have one combined -freduction-depth parameter. Setting it to 0 disbales the check, which is now the recommended way to get (terminating) code to typecheck in releases. (The number of reduction steps may well change between minor GHC releases!) This commit also introduces a new IntWithInf type in BasicTypes that represents an integer+infinity. This type is used in a few places throughout the code. Tests in indexed-types/should_fail/T7788 indexed-types/should_fail/T8550 indexed-types/should_fail/T9554 indexed-types/should_compile/T10079 indexed-types/should_compile/T10139 typecheck/should_compile/T10184 (expected broken) typecheck/should_compile/T10185 (expected broken) This commit also changes performance testsuite numbers, for the better.
* compiler: de-lhs main/Austin Seipp2014-12-031-0/+32
Signed-off-by: Austin Seipp <austin@well-typed.com>