summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/testsuite/tests/array/should_run/arr007.stderr
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Allow CallStacks to be frozenEric Seidel2015-12-231-2/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This introduces "freezing," an operation which prevents further locations from being appended to a CallStack. Library authors may want to prevent CallStacks from exposing implementation details, as a matter of hygiene. For example, in ``` head [] = error "head: empty list" ghci> head [] *** Exception: head: empty list CallStack (from implicit params): error, called at ... ``` including the call-site of `error` in `head` is not strictly necessary as the error message already specifies clearly where the error came from. So we add a function `freezeCallStack` that wraps an existing CallStack, preventing further call-sites from being pushed onto it. In other words, ``` pushCallStack callSite (freezeCallStack callStack) = freezeCallStack callStack ``` Now we can define `head` to not produce a CallStack at all ``` head [] = let ?callStack = freezeCallStack emptyCallStack in error "head: empty list" ghci> head [] *** Exception: head: empty list CallStack (from implicit params): error, called at ... ``` --- 1. We add the `freezeCallStack` and `emptyCallStack` and update the definition of `CallStack` to support this functionality. 2. We add `errorWithoutStackTrace`, a variant of `error` that does not produce a stack trace, using this feature. I think this is a sensible wrapper function to provide in case users want it. 3. We replace uses of `error` in base with `errorWithoutStackTrace`. The rationale is that base does not export any functions that use CallStacks (except for `error` and `undefined`) so there's no way for the stack traces (from Implicit CallStacks) to include user-defined functions. They'll only contain the call to `error` itself. As base already has a good habit of providing useful error messages that name the triggering function, the stack trace really just adds noise to the error. (I don't have a strong opinion on whether we should include this third commit, but the change was very mechanical so I thought I'd include it anyway in case there's interest) 4. Updates tests in `array` and `stm` submodules Test Plan: ./validate, new test is T11049 Reviewers: simonpj, nomeata, goldfire, austin, hvr, bgamari Reviewed By: simonpj Subscribers: thomie Projects: #ghc Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D1628 GHC Trac Issues: #11049
* Make 'error' include the CCS call stack when profiledSimon Marlow2015-11-131-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary: The idea here is that this gives a more detailed stack trace in two cases: 1. With `-prof` and `-fprof-auto` 2. In GHCi (see #11047) Example, with an error inserted in nofib/shootout/binary-trees: ``` $ ./Main 3 Main: z CallStack (from ImplicitParams): error, called at Main.hs:67:29 in main:Main CallStack (from -prof): Main.check' (Main.hs:(67,1)-(68,82)) Main.check (Main.hs:63:1-21) Main.stretch (Main.hs:32:35-57) Main.main.c (Main.hs:32:9-57) Main.main (Main.hs:(27,1)-(43,42)) Main.CAF (<entire-module>) ``` This doesn't quite obsolete +RTS -xc, which also attempts to display more information in the case when the error is in a CAF, but I'm exploring other solutions to that. Includes submodule updates. Test Plan: validate Reviewers: simonpj, ezyang, gridaphobe, bgamari, hvr, austin Reviewed By: bgamari Subscribers: thomie Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D1426
* base: use Show for ErrorCall in uncaughtExceptionHandlerEric Seidel2015-09-211-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | The default top-level exception handler now uses the `Show` instance for `ErrorCall` when printing exceptions, so it will actually print the out-of-band data (e.g. `CallStack`s) in compiled binaries, instead of just printing the error message. This also updates the hpc submodule to fix the test output. Reviewed By: austin, thomie Differential Revision: https://phabricator.haskell.org/D1217
* Move tests from tests/ghc-regress/* to just tests/*David Terei2011-07-201-0/+1